Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Evolution of Mammalian Brain Structures; the Need for a (New) Cerebrotype Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Behavior in Oblivion: The Neurobiology of Subliminal Priming
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The “Id” Knows More than the “Ego” Admits: Neuropsychoanalytic and Primal Consciousness Perspectives on the Interface Between Affective and Cognitive Neuroscience
Open AccessArticle

Combining Computational Modeling and Neuroimaging to Examine Multiple Category Learning Systems in the Brain

Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2012, 2(2), 176-202;
Received: 1 March 2012 / Revised: 30 March 2012 / Accepted: 18 April 2012 / Published: 23 April 2012
Considerable evidence has argued in favor of multiple neural systems supporting human category learning, one based on conscious rule inference and one based on implicit information integration. However, there have been few attempts to study potential system interactions during category learning. The PINNACLE (Parallel Interactive Neural Networks Active in Category Learning) model incorporates multiple categorization systems that compete to provide categorization judgments about visual stimuli. Incorporating competing systems requires inclusion of cognitive mechanisms associated with resolving this competition and creates a potential credit assignment problem in handling feedback. The hypothesized mechanisms make predictions about internal mental states that are not always reflected in choice behavior, but may be reflected in neural activity. Two prior functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of category learning were re-analyzed using PINNACLE to identify neural correlates of internal cognitive states on each trial. These analyses identified additional brain regions supporting the two types of category learning, regions particularly active when the systems are hypothesized to be in maximal competition, and found evidence of covert learning activity in the “off system” (the category learning system not currently driving behavior). These results suggest that PINNACLE provides a plausible framework for how competing multiple category learning systems are organized in the brain and shows how computational modeling approaches and fMRI can be used synergistically to gain access to cognitive processes that support complex decision-making machinery. View Full-Text
Keywords: categorization; explicit; implicit; computational modeling; non-conscious processing categorization; explicit; implicit; computational modeling; non-conscious processing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Nomura, E.M.; Reber, P.J. Combining Computational Modeling and Neuroimaging to Examine Multiple Category Learning Systems in the Brain. Brain Sci. 2012, 2, 176-202.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop