Next Article in Journal
Adults with Cerebral Palsy: Navigating the Complexities of Aging
Next Article in Special Issue
EEG Changes during Propofol Anesthesia Induction in Vegetative State Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Serial Polydrug Use on the Rewarding and Aversive Effects of the Novel Synthetic Cathinone Eutylone
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness

1
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Chang Chun Street, Beijing 100053, China
2
Zhuhai UM Science & Technology Research Institute, No. 1889 Huandao East Road, Zhuhai 519031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(9), 1295; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091295
Submission received: 14 August 2023 / Revised: 30 August 2023 / Accepted: 1 September 2023 / Published: 8 September 2023

Abstract

Frontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and parietal tDCS are effective for treating disorders of consciousness (DoC); however, the relative efficacies of these techniques have yet to be determined. This paper compares the neuromodulation effects of frontal and parietal tDCS on DoC. Twenty patients with DoC were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. One group received single-session frontal tDCS and single-session sham tDCS. The other group received single-session parietal tDCS and single-session sham tDCS. Before and after every tDCS session, we recorded coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R) values and an electroencephalogram. CRS-R was also used to evaluate the state of consciousness at 9–12-month follow-up. Both single-session frontal and parietal tDCS caused significant changes in the genuine permutation cross-mutual information (G_PCMI) of local frontal and across brain regions (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the changes in G_PCMI values were significantly correlated to the CRS-R scores at 9–12-month follow-up after frontal and parietal tDCS (p < 0.05). The changes in G_PCMI and CRS-R scores were also correlated (p < 0.05). Both frontal tDCS and parietal tDCS exert neuromodulatory effects in DoC and induce significant changes in electrophysiology. G_PCMI can be used to evaluate the neuromodulation effects of tDCS.
Keywords: disorders of consciousness (DoC); tDCS; G_PCMI; EEG disorders of consciousness (DoC); tDCS; G_PCMI; EEG

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wan, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Song, W. A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091295

AMA Style

Wan X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Song W. A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(9):1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wan, Xiaoping, Yong Wang, Ye Zhang, and Weiqun Song. 2023. "A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness" Brain Sciences 13, no. 9: 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091295

APA Style

Wan, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Song, W. (2023). A Comparison of the Neuromodulation Effects of Frontal and Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sciences, 13(9), 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop