Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy
AbstractIn Contingency, irony and solidarity Rorty attempts to solve what Robert Pippin calls the ‘Modernity Problem’ by outlining a new self-understanding for the intellectuals of the ideal liberal society. The so-called liberal ironists of this post-philosophical milieu are no longer characterized by the quest for what Rorty describes as ‘a single vision’. This paper evaluates Rorty’s attempt to conceptualize the self-image of post-philosophical intellectuals in the light of two similar endeavors; namely, Nietzsche’s and the ancient Sceptics’. The preliminary conclusion is that although Rorty’s attempt fails, it points to an alternative way of interpreting the desire for a single vision; namely, as a form of autobiography. Drawing on Nietzsche, Nagel and Mill, the paper proceeds to argue that Rorty’s own autobiographical fragment exemplifies the way in which the narration of a failed attempt to find a ‘single vision’ can itself be seen as the achievement of such a vision. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Gascoigne, N. Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy. Humanities 2013, 2, 384-403.
Gascoigne N. Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy. Humanities. 2013; 2(3):384-403.Chicago/Turabian Style
Gascoigne, Neil. 2013. "Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy." Humanities 2, no. 3: 384-403.