Previous Article in Journal
“Girl, I Got My Mind. And What Goes on in It. Which Is to Say, I Got Me”: Artistic Self-Fashioning/Self-Mothering in Toni Morrison’s Sula (1973)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Curating Archaeological Provenience Data Across Excavation Recording Formats

University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-2400, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Humanities 2025, 14(11), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/h14110210
Submission received: 27 February 2025 / Revised: 28 September 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 23 October 2025

Abstract

Archaeological excavations today generate extensive datasets across survey, excavation, and analysis activities, especially when they are conducted in collaborative structures such as field schools. Working across such activities, data archivists contribute to the goals and research outcomes of the dig by establishing data practices that are participatory and educational (two pillars of data literacy) as they permanently record information about the archaeological results. At the Venus Pompeiana Project (VPP), a collaborative archaeological investigation of the Sanctuary of Venus in Pompeii, both provenance and provenience data are recorded into a database at the trenches’ edge, which optimises the accuracy of the data by allowing direct input and review by the data creators and archaeological site experts. When legacy data about work conducted decades or even centuries earlier are brought into the data picture, scholars stand to gain a deeper understanding of the geographic locations of key interest over time. Yet, the integration of analogue legacy and digital archival datasets is collaborative and longitudinal work. In this paper, we bring together experiential reflections on data archiving conducted at both the excavation site and in the physical archives of the Pompeii Archaeological Park. We then provide an integrative analysis of the outcomes of such data curation, highlighting what each data archiving contributor “discovered” about the site as a whole or a specific artefact, feature, or data category. Our findings contribute deeper insights into what data archiving and format-specific curation activities are most effective for learning experiences, archaeological scholarship, and professional practices.
Keywords: data archiving; archaeological archives; experiential learning; archival research data archiving; archaeological archives; experiential learning; archival research

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buchanan, S.A.; Stephenson, T.R.; Nesti, D.; Mogetta, M. Curating Archaeological Provenience Data Across Excavation Recording Formats. Humanities 2025, 14, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/h14110210

AMA Style

Buchanan SA, Stephenson TR, Nesti D, Mogetta M. Curating Archaeological Provenience Data Across Excavation Recording Formats. Humanities. 2025; 14(11):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/h14110210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buchanan, Sarah A., Tiana R. Stephenson, Diletta Nesti, and Marcello Mogetta. 2025. "Curating Archaeological Provenience Data Across Excavation Recording Formats" Humanities 14, no. 11: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/h14110210

APA Style

Buchanan, S. A., Stephenson, T. R., Nesti, D., & Mogetta, M. (2025). Curating Archaeological Provenience Data Across Excavation Recording Formats. Humanities, 14(11), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/h14110210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop