3.3.1. Programme Assumptions and Organisational Model
In the second half of the 1990s, the municipal authorities began working to consolidate ephemeral artistic practices in the city. The strategy was to embed the organising institutions in permanent locations, particularly in post-industrial buildings, thereby simultaneously preserving the historical substance of them. Here, the use of the former Lefèvre-Utile (LU) pastry factory on Quai Ferdinand-Favre, built in the 19th century and enhanced at the beginning of the 20th century with two Art Nouveau towers, can be cited as an example. After production ceased, the building deteriorated. Its cultural potential was revealed by an edition of the
Les Allumées festival and other events, so in 1997, the Nantes municipal authorities decided to renovate it and turn it into a cultural centre. The work was led by Patrick Bouchain, and the only surviving tower was restored by Jean-Marie Lépinay. In 2000, Lieu Unique, a modern cultural centre open to all areas of the arts, began operating here (
Legrand 2016;
Le Voyage à Nantes 2025).
The tidying up of the Île de Nantes became an important issue, and a competition for a master plan for the space was organised in 1998, accompanied by numerous discussions with local associations and open public meetings. The competition was won by a team led by landscape designer Alexandre Chemetoff. What distinguished their proposal from other refined and rigorous projects was its indicative and non-normative nature reflecting not so much concrete solutions as directions for change and a modus operandi of gradual refinement and updating of details as implementation progressed in a systematic way (
Figure 2). Chemetoff’s credo was to construct situations taking into account that a city is always a combination of circumstances. He identified the integration of the island with the city and the city with the river as a goal and based the project on a network of public spaces and, at the same time, the search for connectivity with the cultural heritage of the place (
Devisme et al. 2009;
Violeau 2015;
Chemetoff and Freydefont 2016;
Lescop 2019). Management of the work was entrusted to SAMOA (Société d’Aménagement de la Métropole Ouest Atlantique), the West Atlantic Metropolis Development Corporation, created in 2003, and led by Laurent Théry, a company partly based on outsourcing but still linked to the local authority, representing as many project stakeholders as possible. An important aspect of SAMOA’s work was public consultation and participatory activities among residents (
Nicolas 2014;
Legrand 2016;
Morteau 2020).
Initially, thinking about directions for the revitalisation of Nantes was greatly influenced by the success of Bilbao in Spain. Both the earlier economic boom and the later problems of this city had a similar origin to that of Nantes. Bilbao developed as a port city and an important centre for shipbuilding and metallurgy. The city began to decline after the economic crisis of the 1970s. The final chord was the closure of the Euskalduna shipyard in 1986. In turn, the revival came largely through the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation’s Museum of Modern Art, built to a design by Frank O. Gehry. The extravagant building immediately became an architectural icon and a landmark of the city. It brought fame, attracted crowds of tourists, and contributed to an economic boom and the realisation of further investments, often also by stars of world architecture. Basing economic development on culture became an axiom, with many city authorities keen to replicate Bilbao’s success. The Nantes authorities kept a close eye on the Spanish city’s regeneration policy. However, it soon became apparent that copying the solutions used there was not possible. On the one hand, no investor appeared ready to offer Nantes a similar museum building, while the city itself was not in a position to bear such costs. On the other hand, the Bilbao model was increasingly criticised, not least because of its unifying nature, failing to take into account local specificities (Bilbao’s brownfield sites were razed) and the commodification of culture (
Huberson 2007–2008;
Nicolas 2014;
Lescop 2019;
Kępczyńska-Walczak 2023).
The abandonment of the flagship of star-architecture did not change the perception in Nantes of culture as a fundamental tool for urban development and a dominant thread in urban planning. At the same time, the search began for a way to incorporate the city’s past into the project. The public consultation identified the need to respect the industrial and port heritage and the importance of maritime identity, which was taken into account in the programme assumptions (
Devisme et al. 2009). In practice, this was translated into keeping interventions to a minimum and aiming to preserve the material substance, from the production halls and warehouses to the former slipways to the original pavements, the reuse of remnants, and even old rails or stones and bricks. The intention was not to create a completely new identity for the city, but to treat the past as a starting point for shaping its image (
Lescop 2019). The Island was never to be the same again but at the same time never to become radically different (
Violeau 2015). The Parc des Chantiers (Shipyard Park) was therefore created in the north-west of the island on degraded wasteland, formed with great care and respect. Two cranes situated on the waterfront have become a sign of their former purpose: a yellow one, once owned by the Dubigeon shipyard (
Figure 3), and a grey one, owned by the former port (
Nantes Patrimonia 2025). They are strong spatial dominants of the park and are kind of art installations, recycled ready-made objects.
3.3.2. Les Machines de Île Project
The Chantiers park is where the island’s main art project, Les Machines de Île, was realised. Its creators, François Delarozière and Pierre Oréfice, came from the Royal de Luxe. The former was the creator of sets, machines, and puppets for the shows, while the latter was involved in the production of the performances. The impetus for the creation of the machines was the desire to give permanence to an ephemeral urban spectacle while at the same time creating a place aimed at both children and adults and diametrically opposed to traditional theme parks. The main difference was to be that the project was rooted in the urban space, in everyday life, as opposed to typical attractions located outside the city and outside life. The concept drew on the tradition of street performances, as their eccentric aesthetic gained the approval of Nantes residents, but the authors also drew on the city’s industrial past and the island’s workers’ ethos. The Île de Nantes was once again to become a place where machines were made, where the expertise of the old workers survived. An additional layer of meaning, not originally intended by the authors, was brought about by the city authorities’ interest in the figure of Jules Verne, who was born in Nantes, and the reference to unusual constructions from his novels (
Lescop 2019).
Delarozière and Oréfice’s proposal competed with other ideas, such as the very strongly supported slavery museum, the naval and trade museum, or the concept of ‘ships of industry’ combining industrial themes from the past with the development and dissemination of new technologies. Eventually, in 2004, the municipal authorities adopted the Les Machines project, which was much cheaper than the star-architecture building and could be phased. Therefore, the focus was not on a single site but on an entire island. The opening took place in 2007. The showpiece of the project and the first completed machine became the Great Elephant,
2 a twelve-metre high structure mostly made of wood and metal, which roamed, and still does, around the island, transporting visitors and releasing water from the trunk. The elephant became the host of the island, showing the city from an unusual perspective, drawing attention to the former brownfield sites (
Lescop 2019) (
Figure 4). The exhibition also included a more ‘musealised’ part: a workshop, located in one of the halls of the former shipyard with a footbridge, allowing the makers to be observed at work, and a gallery with models of more machines. The project was very well received by Nantes residents and visitors to the city. During the first month, the number of visitors exceeded 50,000 and, in the first year, 288,000. Undoubtedly, the ludic nature of the event, reminiscent of street performances and understandable to everyone, as well as the opportunity for interaction, contributed to this. The authors also ensured quality by avoiding plastic. The steam-punk aesthetic, associated with the age of steam, is expressed in high-quality materials and a tradition of excellent craftsmanship. The machines were built by people who had experience in woodcarving, leatherworking, or metalworking. Later, more machines were created, including mobile and interactive ones, and the Carrousel des mondes marins (Carousel of marine worlds) (
Figure 5), referencing the harbour past and distant voyages, opened at Parc des Chantiers in 2012 (
Huberson 2007–2008;
Nicolas 2014;
Chemetoff and Freydefont 2016;
Gangloff 2016a;
Lambert 2020;
Les Machines 2025).
The appearance of the Great Elephant had a very strong impact on the visual identity of the city. The elephant, poetically linked to its past and a vehicle for new urban myths, became a symbol, an emblem of Nantes, used to build local identity and promote the city externally (
Huberson 2007–2008;
Gangloff 2016b).
Despite the success of the venture, the city decided so far not to expand the project by the garden with the giant l’Arbre aux Hérons (Heron Tree), proposed by Delarozière and Oréfice. The installation would have stood on the other side of the Loire at the Miséry quarry, the former Brasseries de la Meuse wilderness, extending the concept to another part of the city. The cost of EUR 35 million is proving too high for the municipal budget and socially unacceptable.
3.3.3. Works of Art in Public Spaces
Creating an image of Nantes as a city of art resulted in an openness to artistic experimentation outside the gallery framework. Artworks produced this way are characterised by great diversity in terms of the thematic threads, the techniques used, and the scale and strength of the aesthetic intervention in the surrounding urban space. So far, they have not been scientifically developed. It is impossible to list them all within the framework of the following study, so a few, representing some of the directions, are presented below. The criterion for selection is the particular relationship of the works with the city and its users, which takes place on different levels: 1. towards the users, which is mainly manifested in encouraging them to interact; 2. towards the urban landscape; 3. towards particular buildings; and 4. towards the history of the city. Art pieces are presented in this order in the article, taking into consideration their most understandable meaning. However, some works establish more than one type of relationship; the links are summarised in
Table 1 at the end of the subsection.
Interaction with users:
Many works are the setting for the users’ daily activities, making them obvious and somewhat ‘transparent.’ These include, for example, sports facilities.
L’Arbre à Basket from 2012, designed by the a/LTA agency, was set up in the Parc des Chantiers near the children’s playground. It is a metal structure shaped like a simplified tree, to which basketball hoops are attached at different heights (
Figure 6). The visually appealing form allows people of different heights to participate, for several teams to play simultaneously, or for creative innovation of the rules. Several playing fields designated on the pitch were added to the tree (
Le Voyage à Nantes 2025).
The installation
Ping-Pong Park by Laurent Perbos from 2017, placed, or perhaps rather, unfortunately, hidden, in an intimate garden at the Quai François Mitterrand is a gaming table enhanced by a blue spiral hoop (
Figure 7) (
Le Voyage à Nantes 2025). The utilitarian sculpture diversifies the game with unexpected bounces of the ball in surprising directions, defying the established logic of the game.
Feydball from 2015, designed by Barré-Lambot Architectes, is a play on unusual form and optical illusion (
Figure 8). The ball pitch is in the shape of a crescent, and the terrain’s unevenness is also preserved. At the same time, a curved mirror is added here, whose reflection creates a kind of anamorphosis, showing the playing field as a rectangle but deforming the players’ figures.
Traverses by Aurélien Bory 2016 is a work that was created during the redevelopment of Boulevard Léon-Bureau. It is a 15-metre wide, busy street on the Île de Nantes, connecting the Parc des Chantiers and the quartier de la Création. The work aim to slow down car traffic and create a public space connecting all users, car drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians, in a safe, collision-free way, without introducing traffic lights. The introduction of the art installation was intended to give the place an individual character and meaning, alluding to the creative factor on the island while at the same time not disrupting its functionality but supporting it. A proposal by Aurélien Bory, set designer, choreographer, and director, was selected for realisation, proposing to highlight pedestrian crossings through intersecting wavy lines (
Figure 9). The peculiar dance of public transport is graphically reflected on the surface of the street. It invites users to interact and is reminiscent of childish games played ‘in passing’ while wandering around the city (
Traverses 2016).
A utilitarian object that, contrary to its name, cannot be overlooked, is the
L’Absence bar by Atelier Van Lieshout from 2009. It is built on the banks of the Loire next to the School of Architecture, which opened in the same year (
Figure 10). The contourless blue block appears to be created from ice or sea foam and contrasts with the straight lines of the neighbouring building. This is a deliberate effect, intended to make the school’s students think more deeply about architecture. In turn, extensive windows were inserted on the river side, opening the pavilion to nature (
Le Voyage à Nantes 2025).
Interaction with the urban landscape:
Among the works of art that are particularly in tune with the topography and architecture of the city, it is worth mentioning
Les Anneaux, which Daniel Buren and Patrick Bouchain designed for the 2007 Estuaire Festival. The installation consists of a sequence of 18 silver rings, attached to old bollards on the quay of the Île de Nantes—Quai des Antilles. It highlights both the natural line of the Loire and the historical setting of the former deep-sea port (
Le Voyage à Nantes 2025). The landscape value of the installations is undeniable; they have an impact not only as a whole but also individually, offering framed views of the city (
Figure 11). At night, the rings are illuminated in red, blue, and green, corresponding to the current function of the former banana-ripening plant, which houses a nightclub alongside the exhibition hall, restaurant, and bars. The artists did not impose an interpretation of their work on the viewers; it can be read on many levels: the nuptials using rings of sea, river, and land; the merging of two eras, the city’s maritime past and contemporary urban and architectural transformations; and finally, the reference to the hoops restraining enslaved people are the most frequently indicated themes.
The city’s topography is also linked to
Nymphéa by Ange Leccia in 2007. It is a video installation that, after nightfall, appears where one of the tributaries of the Loire, the river Erdre, is trapped in a tunnel and emerges (
Figure 12). The work is an image of the actress Laetitia Casta, who plays a role of a water nymph or mermaid here (Le Voyage à Nantes). The movement of the water gives the work a gentle dynamic and emphasises the contemplative character. The work’s title seems to suggest a reference to the work of Claude Monet, as nymphéa is also the term for the water flower, often present in this artist’s work.
Interaction with a particular building:
The pop art-like convention includes 2013’s
Mètre à Ruban, a huge yellow tape measure designed by Lilian Bourgeat and mounted in picturesque twists in the courtyard at the headquarters of the construction company Aethica (
Figure 13). The artist found beauty in a simple tool, an obvious accessory for any architect, urban planner, or creator of urban-scale art installations, and she herself described it as a ‘self-portrait.’ She also managed to make the audience feel like tiny characters from the old Nantes stories about giants (
Le Voyage à Nantes 2025).
The opposite of this eye-catching, overscaled installation is the lyrical
Le Passage by Eva Jospin, installed in 2019, placed in a 50-metre walkway between Tour-d’Auvergne and Pierre-Landais streets, connecting homes and offices (
Figure 14). The artist stretched delicate twigs of brass, copper wires, chains, and gilded paper on a truss of metal ropes. The work completely changes the aura of the austere, minimalist architecture of the walkway, creating an ephemeral canopy above the heads of passers-by and allowing the sun to create delicate drawings on the walls and floor.
Interaction with history of the city:
The tragic fate of the slaves, transported by Nantes ships, is commemorated. In 2012, the
Mémorial de l’abolition de l’esclavage (Memorial to the Abolition of Slavery) by Krzysztof Wodiczko and Julian Bonder was unveiled (
Figure 15). It is located on the banks of the Loire, on the Quai de la Fosse, which is a significant location. It was here that there was a port from which slave ships departed. The monument is also incorporated into a symbolic–architectural–urban premise. It is situated opposite the Palace of Justice (arch. Jean Nouvel, 2000) and a footbridge, connecting the city to the island, named after Victor Schœlcher, who led the outlawing of slavery in France in 1848. The monument is based on two gestures, unveiling and immersion, and consists of an underground and an above-ground section. The underground section is a 140-metre-long walkway made of concrete and glass that lets in narrow lines of light reflected from the water. It is a very discreet but evocative recreation of the ship’s hold. The experience is enriched with words and sound, and one can read and listen to texts related to slavery. At the end of the walkway there is a telescope with a view of the Palace of Justice. The 350-metre-long above-ground section mainly features the names of slave ships embedded in the granular pavement, engraved on glass panels (
Figure 16). They are extremely numerous: as many as 2000, which makes the visitors aware of the scale of the practice (
Ostolski and Wodiczko 2013).
3.3.4. Creative Quarter
Even the first cultural activities on Île de Nantes meant that the area attracted artists, especially at the beginning of the transformation, when land was relatively cheap there. The cluster of artists formed spontaneously. In order to strengthen the island’s artistic potential, the municipal authorities decided not to stop at just introducing Les Machines to the brownfield site but to dedicate the western end of the island of Nantes to a creative quarter. It was intended to bring together art colleges (such as L’école nationale supérieure d’architecture: School of Architecture or L’école des Beaux-Arts Nantes Saint-Nazaire: School of Fine Arts), cultural and tourist facilities, and small businesses related to the arts. Initially, in line with the methodology of the operations on the island, a structured, predictable approach did not emerge. Over time, with the development of the concept of ‘creative and cultural industries’, promoted by the European Union and the belief that culture carries economic value, the concept of the cluster emerged. It was reinforced by the increasingly popular views of Richard Florida, who proclaimed that the most important factor in the development of territories was the concentration of the creative class (
Florida 2010).
Between 2005 and 2012, Nantes took part in the European Union’s Economic Cluster of Cultural Enterprises and the European Cultural and Creative Industries Alliance programmes and became part of the Eurocities network, linking up with other cities developing creative clusters. The departure of Alexandre Chemetoff and Laurent Therry in 2010 and the assumption of Jean-Luc Charles as director of SAMOA accelerated the implementation of the economic strategy on the island. In 2012, a team was set up to organise the Quartier de la Création. The project centre is located in the former Alstom production halls. According to the logic of creative clusters, territorial proximity is supposed to facilitate cooperation between higher education in their scientific and teaching dimensions, creators, and entrepreneurs. The Quartier de la Création’s activities resulted in a concentration of universities related to creativity in the broadest sense; numerous companies in the fields of architecture, art, design, media, and events; and the CityLab urban laboratory to support creative activities (
Lefeuvre 2015;
Legrand 2016).
In Nantes, the urban factor was also incorporated, assuming work for the creation of the city and its use, developing three axes: sustainable and integrated city, space, lifestyle, and health; well-being; and a better life (
Morteau 2020).
The formation of the Quartier de la Création, however, raised a number of questions and concerns about the applicability of the cluster concept to artistic creation and the economic instrumentalization of culture. Hence, the attempts to reorganise governance and increase the participation of grassroots community initiatives and, at the same time, the semantic change with regard to the venture follow suit. The notion of a creative community was intended to emphasise the importance of bottom-up dynamics and voluntary collaboration. Another alternative to the cluster became the theatre-like scene, not so much in the sense of linking a specific art genre to a place with more or less clear boundaries but rather in the spirit of urban and cultural sociology, focusing on the norms and messages conveyed by artists and their audiences. Cultural actors are not seen here solely as economic actors and producers of cultural goods but also as social actors who mobilise in defence of values (
Lefeuvre 2015;
Legrand 2016;
Molho and Morteau 2016;
Morteau and Sagot-Duvauroux 2016).