Ar(c)tivism and Policing: Unveiling the Theatrics of Justice and Resistance in Nigeria’s S$\stackrel{\mathbf{̀}}{\mathbf{ọ}}$r$\stackrel{\mathbf{̀}}{\mathbf{ọ}}$-Sókè Movement

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Intro sets out the themes for readers who might not know the specifics of the region and political concerns. There is later elaboration and background context.

The notion of 'artivist' and role of art in social justice, resistance, and change is broadly covered. Significant theoretical approaches are discussed. The opportunities and challenges of digital activism are considered.

The heritage of artistic resistance in Nigeria (and elsewhere) is clearly demonstrated.

The case-study is presented well with evidence.

There is a method of appreciation and three examples are discussed further.

The conclusion reiterates that here is a powerful example of artivism.

Perhaps in the final piece the images could be larger?

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript.

The paper presents a strong theoretical foundation, effectively engaging with both historical and contemporary research on the topic. The introduction situates the study within the broader academic discourse; however, a more explicit discussion of how this work extends, challenges, or contributes to existing literature would enhance its scholarly impact.

The methodology is clearly articulated, yet a more detailed justification of the chosen approach would strengthen its rigor. Additionally, while the discussion on data collection and analysis is sufficient, greater transparency regarding potential biases or limitations would improve the study’s credibility and replicability. Clarify the research questions and hypotheses at the beginning of the methodology section.

The discussion of findings is well-balanced and engaging. However, establishing a stronger connection between the empirical data and the theoretical framework would enhance the depth and coherence of the argument.

The findings generally support the conclusions, yet certain interpretations appear somewhat speculative. A more cautious framing of these claims, with explicit reference to the presented claims, would enhance their validity.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The paper is written in clear and precise academic English; however, minor grammatical inconsistencies and occasional awkward phrasings could be refined to enhance readability and linguistic fluidity.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The essay is clear, well-argued, and original.  It is a contribution to art and activist scholarship. There is one typo on 352 in the Feldman method, Analysis is missing the s.  And I think the the discussion of the individual works of art would be clearer if the 4 elements were grouped together: art work: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgement.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf