Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making: Lessons from Some Recent Legal Reforms
AbstractArticle 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities calls for a thorough review of State laws to recognise the right of persons with disabilities to enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others, thereby abolishing substitute decision-making regimes, and to receive the support they need for its exercise. With the aim of providing useful guidelines for legislative changes yet to be made, the present study examines and assesses, in the light of the Convention, some of the most recent and innovative legislative reforms in the area of legal capacity. The analysis shows that, although they appropriately reflect a change of perspective, shifting from the paradigm of the “best interests” of the person to the respect of their will and preferences, some of these reforms are not fully satisfactory, particularly because they still allow partial or total deprivation of legal capacity for persons with disabilities, and maintain institutions which perpetuate substitute decision-making. However, the recent modification of the Peruvian Civil Code and Civil Procedure Code deserves a highly positive evaluation as the first regulation of legal capacity and supported decision-making substantially compliant with the Convention. View Full-Text
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.
Share & Cite This Article
Martinez-Pujalte, A. Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making: Lessons from Some Recent Legal Reforms. Laws 2019, 8, 4.
Martinez-Pujalte A. Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making: Lessons from Some Recent Legal Reforms. Laws. 2019; 8(1):4.Chicago/Turabian Style
Martinez-Pujalte, Antonio. 2019. "Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making: Lessons from Some Recent Legal Reforms." Laws 8, no. 1: 4.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.