Next Article in Journal
Here to Stay: The Evolution of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in International Human Rights Law
Previous Article in Journal
Donald Trump and Institutional Change Strategies
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

The Rights Network: 100 Years of the Hohfeldian Rights Analytic

Lecturer in Law, University of Westminster, London W1W 7UW, UK
Received: 4 May 2018 / Revised: 10 July 2018 / Accepted: 11 July 2018 / Published: 16 July 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [284 KB, uploaded 17 July 2018]

Abstract

This paper sets out to reconsider the Hohfeldian framework of rights in celebration of the centenary anniversary of their original publication. It begins by conceptualizing each of the Hohfeldian incidents or rights before outlining the molecular or complex structure of rights to “things”. I adopt a broad use of the term of “right” and apply it to Legal, Moral, Equitable and Human conceptions and constructions. It sets out an argument in favor of a further definitional model—in addition to Hohfeld’s scheme of opposites and correlatives—which focuses on the function of these conceptual rights. Finally, it sets out to provide a model of rights as forming a network within a given community and the exponential growth of “rights-connections” within an expanding community. This is used to frame responses to common criticisms of “rights talk” and the balance of benefits and burdens on account of such a rights network. Ultimately, this paper seeks to demonstrate the benefit, and indeed necessity, of the Hohfeldian model in any discussion of rights. Without it “rights talk” is debased and impoverished. View Full-Text
Keywords: rights; duties; Hohfeld; obligations; network; human rights rights; duties; Hohfeld; obligations; network; human rights
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Clayton Thompson, J. The Rights Network: 100 Years of the Hohfeldian Rights Analytic. Laws 2018, 7, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top