Post-Release Success among Paroled Lifers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Social Factors
1.3. Institutional Factors
1.4. Personal Factors
1.5. This Study
- (1)
- What types of factors (social, institutional, and personal) are most prevalent in lifers’ attributions to success post-release?
- (2)
- How do lifers who were successful in staying out differ from lifers who are re-incarcerated in how they attribute success to these various factors?
- (3)
- How do these results indicate how lifers may differ from short-term offenders?
2. Methodology
2.1. Design
2.1.1. Non-Incarcerated Lifers
2.1.2. Re-Incarcerated Lifers
2.2. Interview Procedure
2.3. Participants
Non-incarcerated interviewees (N=28) | Re-incarcerated interviewees (N=36) | Total (N=64) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demographic characteristics | N | % | N | % | N | % |
Age at offense | 25.6 ± 8.8 | 19.9 ± 3.5 | 22.3 ± 6.9 | |||
Age at time of interview | 55.7 ± 9.8 | 53.3 ± 8.7 | 54.4 ± 9.2 | |||
Race | ||||||
White | 12 | 43 | 17 | 47 | 29 | 45 |
Black | 12 | 43 | 15 | 42 | 27 | 42 |
Latino | 3 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
Other | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Life sentence characteristics | ||||||
Total years incarcerated for homicide | ||||||
≤ 15 years | 10 | 36 | 5 | 14 | 15 | 23 |
16–25 years | 13 | 47 | 20 | 56 | 33 | 52 |
≥ 26 years | 5 | 18 | 11 | 31 | 16 | 25 |
Average sentence length | 19.1 ± 7.6 | 21.9 ± 6.3 | 20.7 ± 7.0 | |||
Age at time of first parole 2 | ||||||
≤ 35 | 4 | 15 | 8 | 22 | 12 | 19 |
36–45 | 12 | 44 | 17 | 47 | 29 | 46 |
≥ 51 | 11 | 41 | 11 | 31 | 22 | 35 |
Average age at parole | 44.7 ± 11.9 | 41.8 ± 6.9 | 43.0 ± 9.4 |
2.4. Data Analyses
3. Results
3.1. What Types of Factors (Social, Institutional, and Personal) are Most Prevalent in Lifers’ Attributions to Success Post-Release?
3.1.1. Social Factors
Role of Intimate Partner
Non-Incarcerated interviewees (N = 28) | Re-incarcerated interviewees (N = 36) | Total (N = 64) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employment | N | % | N | % | N | % |
Unemployed, not in school | 5 | 17 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
Manual employment | 8 | 27 | 27 | 75 | 35 | 55 |
Counseling | 13 | 46 | 3 | 8 | 16 | 25 |
Other (in school, creative or white-collar job) | 2 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
Intimate partner | ||||||
Married/In a committed relationship | 10 | 38 | 18 | 50 | 28 | 44 |
Ambiguous | 7 | 27 | 9 | 25 | 16 | 25 |
No intimate partner | 11 | 39 | 9 | 25 | 20 | 31 |
Parenthood | ||||||
Children | 16 | 57 | 18 | 50 | 34 | 53 |
No children | 11 | 39 | 17 | 47 | 28 | 44 |
The worst thing would be to get into a committed relationship that I knew I wasn’t ready for […] I think we need to grow into that. And part of that growth process is coming to terms with certain things about ourselves. I think in order to have a healthy relationship, with a partner, I think you really need to be […] accepting of who you really are, not who you want to be.(Non-incarcerated male, age 50)
But she wasn’t as grounded as I was. She was using and I felt confident in my sobriety. I was like: ‘See, she is using, but I’m clean, I’m good, I’m strong.’ And one day, I remember, she set a cigarette down in the ashtray and […] before I knew it, I would go to the store, buy a pack for her and buy a pack for myself, too. And I would buy her a bottle and get two beers myself. So I was on a slippery slope. Before I knew it, I was smoking weed with her and started using alcohol.(Re-incarcerated male, age 58)
I think I tried to play catch-up. My girlfriend, you see, she was a stripper. And she earned a lotta cash for just working a couple of nights. Now, when she became pregnant I tried to keep on living her lifestyle, the lifestyle we had with her salary, but we couldn’t […]. So, the other side kicked in, that criminal side of me, when it wasn’t supposed to.(Re-incarcerated male, age 42)
Role of Parenthood
Lots of things I wasn’t privy to […] things with my daughter [while in prison]. While we were living in the same house [after I got out], she felt uncomfortable, I felt uncomfortable […] She had a lot of anger and resentment towards me. She would call me a ‘telephone father.’ […] When I moved out to go and live with my girlfriend, she felt like I was abandoning her all over again.(Re-incarcerated male, age 40)
Now, the [step]-kids have seen my [ankle] bracelet. So now they think I’m a weirdo or something. I ain’t telling them nothing about my life. It’s none of their business, really. So, now the 14-year-old daughter is judging me, saying that I’m no good at this and that and that I should be in prison.(Non-incarcerated male, age 52)
This is good…neither of us are ready to have a relationship. I feel totally powerless with her. I can’t help her. I’m forced to be in here […] I’m seeing my life disappear […] my home life is completely destroyed.(Re-incarcerated male, age 40)
I distanced myself from them… My [three adult] sons, I cannot tell them what to do and how to do it. I just play it safe.(Non-incarcerated male, age 59)
Role of Family Ties
When I got out, I wanted my family to embrace me, to welcome me, to understand that I was gonna do the right thing and be a person that I now need to be, a healthy responsible person, and they weren’t sure. They wanted to see it. People who you’ve hurt in the past, they want you to demonstrate that you’re a changed person, long enough that they can rebuild and regain some trust. [It wasn’t until] the second or the third year of doing the right thing and being out in society, my whole family started looking at me differently.(Non-incarcerated male, age 45)
You know, expecting your family to believe that you’re no longer that person that was taken out of their living room in handcuffs—is that really fair to do to your family? You’ve gotta convince them through hard work, and compassion and understanding where they’re from. Obviously, if you’re known to be violent and do you want. Do families necessarily want to bring you in amongst the kids in the family to adopt your moral beliefs until they know for sure that you are better and working hard?(Non-incarcerated male, age 40)
Role of Employment
The parents became aware that I was an ex-inmate and they did not feel competent knowing that I was an ex-inmate working with their children. The agency fired me and, that triggered off all that negativity because I could not understand or rationalize it. […] I broke down and I went back into that mode where: “Okay you hurt me, I hurt you”. Meaning, in my mind, I am saying: “I am trying to go straight and this is what I’m getting? So, let me do what I know”, and I went back into the street mentality.(Non-incarcerated male, age 63)
I am not getting any younger, I am transitioning into—I am 63 years old—I am transitioning into a career at a point in my life where most people my age would be retiring. I am just starting with a career! I need some time to start paying off these [student] loans and debt that I’m in from that.(Non-incarcerated male, age 63)
I [was] working for my brother, he’s giving me $300 cash a day […] and they say: “You can’t work for your brother.” […] This is what the parole guy says to me […]. I got a job, the next day. […], I go over and tell him I have a job over […] at the scrap metal yard. He says: “Oh no, you’re not working at the scrap metal yard. There’s something wrong with it.”(Non-incarcerated male, age 52)
3.1.2. Institutional Factors
My GED is what really kicked in into gear ‘cause I scored pretty high on my GED […] The more educated I got, the more I realized I could do things that were amazing that I didn’t realize I could do. […] The GED made me say, “Okay, I did this, I can do college too.” […] I started moving forward, and I started doing programs, and when I was doing programs, people began asking me to speak at the programs […] I was only involved in the programs to get parole, I was not involved in the programs because I believed in them. Then I started looking at some of the stuff and going, “wait a minute, that’s me, whoa.”(Non-incarcerated male, age 40)
“If you ask some people to explain me back then […] I’ve never done anything wrong to my friends, or my family, but if I didn’t know you, I didn’t care about you. It was ‘I, I, I, I, I, I, I.’ I had this warped sense of being that was just wrong.”(Non-incarcerated male, age 45)
“They have nothing to offer here, only AA, NA, the CRA [Correctional Recovery Program] and Alternatives to Violence. But for all other programs, they give priority to people with the earliest release date. So I can sign up for GED classes, but won’t get them until a year from now […] It’s me sitting here day in day out, reading books and watching TV. I ref (referee) basketball and softball games, and that’s it.”(Re-incarcerated male, age 44)
Interviewee: [The furlough program] changed my life […] because when I went in, I didn’t really have any values. I was just doing time […]. And I never really held a job or worked like that. It was good. They [his clients] did not know I was in prison.ML: How did the program affect you, once you got out of prison?Interviewee: It socializes you, because it was a work environment. I mean you’re not just with other inmates […]. You gotta learn how to answer the phone in a business-like way. And all this kind of thing, you know, I mean just real practical skills […]. I mean, if I never went to the program, I would have never made it out. And I met a whole lot of people that have said that too. […] The guys who went through the program, I sat most of them, stayed out. I think every one should’ve went through that program. Every lifer that was […], phased out of the system, should’ve went through that program.(Non-incarcerated male, age 66)
“It didn’t help me. People were there [at the AA meeting], getting high, coming in with brown bags. I mean, drug dealers came there to deal drugs. That is not helping anyone.”(Re-incarcerated male, age 52)
“I went because I had to go, not because I wanted to go. I mean, they got high at those meetings. They were unsupervised. How can you respect those meetings when everyone’s high?”(Re-incarcerated male, age 51)
“Everyone was just sharing war stories, like ‘Hey man, I was smoking dope and crack and all that…’ I mean, there was nothing about change, or about fixing the problem.”(Re-incarcerated male, age 43)
3.2. How do Non-Incarcerated and Re-Incarcerated Lifers Differ in How They Attribute Success to These Various Factors?
3.2.1. Self-Efficacy
“I felt, you know, that there was nothing that was not possible, that, I felt that, you know it was almost like a redemption, it was, it was like if you actually sincerely try to do good and tried […] there will be many as believers, many naysayers, people thinking you are running a scam, a con, or whatever, right? And you suffer setbacks, you will get punished for this and that, but if you stick with it, ultimately, having faith in people, you will prevail. And, so that was, that [obtaining a paralegal degree] was proof of that.”(Non-incarcerated male, age 65)
“First thing I did after being released from prison was go around the corner and I got a double quarter pounder. I went to McDonald’s. So then I went to parole, I had to come back, I said: ‘Well let’s go get my permit.’ They’re like: ‘What?’ I said: ‘Let’s go get my permit’, cause I made sure I had all of my stuff so I could get my driver’s license; I did all this before I got out. […] In four hours I got my learners permit to drive. I hear that nobody’s ever done that before either. I believe that’s not true, I think people have they just don’t tell people how to do it—I share the information with people. So I got my learners permit and I drove back to parole. And I went into parole and I showed ‘em my learner’s permit, they laughed, they were like: ‘You got your learner’s permit already?’ I was like ‘yeah, I had to wait to see you so I went over and got my learner’s permit.’ Five days later I have my license and I had my own car. And I told everybody before I left prison, I said that within two to three years, I will own my own home, and I’ll make it. [And they said:] ‘Right’. Watch me […] And if you think about it, I started here [two years ago] so if you think about it, I started this job making about 35 grand a year, six months after I got out. Then, two years to the day of my release, I got approved to buy my home.”(Non-incarcerated male, age 40)
“I was making $35 an hour, I had two vehicles, but the economy started going bad. I lost the job, my wife started to have migraines because of that, I had surgery and I started paying with credit cards. I couldn’t find a job and I was starting to get depressed.”(Re-incarcerated male, age 52)
And that’s where I went wrong. I forgot I was on parole. Life was getting comfortable. And then one day, a guy at work saw that I was in pain [from a recent knee operation] and gave me some valium. And I tested positive and went back in.(Re-incarcerated male, age 58)
False Positives and False Negatives
“I can choose not to eat. I can choose not to wear this monkey suit [pointing to his jumpsuit]. They can say what they want, but I have a choice. I don’t have to listen to him [pointing to the Correctional Officer in the adjacent office]. You will be sent to the hole [solitary confinement] for that, but it’s a choice. I won’t let them take away my freedom, my choice, my individuality, even if I’m wearing this suit like a monkey, I’m still who I am.”(Re-incarcerated male, age 41)
“But I wasn’t [doing anything else] but selling some drugs, and even when I did, and I sold drugs since I’ve been home, but I’d [only] sell to five people [as opposed to many more].”
4. Discussion
4.1. How Do These Results Indicate How Lifers May Differ from Short-Term Offenders?
4.2. Implications for Policy and Practice
4.3. Strengths, Limitations, and Directions for Future Research
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- U.S. Department of Justice. Prisoners in 2010; Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2011.
- Joan Petersilia. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Patrick A. Langan, and David J. Levin. “Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 15 (2002): 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas P. LeBel, and Shadd Maruna. “Life on the Outside: Transitioning from Prison to the Community.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. Edited by Joan Petersilia and Kevin R. Reitz. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 657–83. [Google Scholar]
- Mark Mauer, Ryan S. King, and Malcolm C. Young. The Meaning of "Life": Long Prison Sentences in Context. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Peggy Giordano, Stephen A. Cernkovic, and Jennifer L. Rudolph. “Gender, Crime, and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (2002): 990–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shadd Maruna. Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- José Cid, and Joel Martí. “Turning points and returning points: Understanding the role of family ties in the process of desistance.” European Journal of Criminology 6 (2012): 603–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert J. Sampson, and John H. Laub. “Life-course desisters? Trajectories of Crime among Delinquent Boys Followed to Age 70.” Criminology 41 (2003): 301–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David P. Farrington, Bernard Gallagher, Lynda Morley, Raymond J. St Ledger, and Donald J. West. “Unemployment, School Leaving and Crime.” British Journal of Criminology 26 (1986): 335–56. [Google Scholar]
- Christopher Uggen. “Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism.” American Sociological Review 65 (2000): 529–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christopher Uggen, Jeff Manza, and Angela Behrens. “Less than the average citizen: Stigma, role transition, and the civic reintegration of convicted felons.” In After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Edited by Shadd Maruna and Russell Immarigeon. Portland: Willan Publishing, 2004, pp. 258–90. [Google Scholar]
- Alisa Stevens. “‘I am the person now I was always meant to be’: Identity reconstruction and narrative reframing in therapeutic community prisons.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 5 (2012): 527–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John H. Laub, and Robert J. Sampson. Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Robert J. Sampson, and John H. Laub. “A General Age-Graded Theory of Crime: Lessons Learned and the Future of Life-Course Criminology.” In Integrated Developmental and Life Course Theories of Offending. Edited by David Farrington. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2005, vol. 13. [Google Scholar]
- Robert J. Sampson, and John H. Laub. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Christy A. Visher. “Incarcerated fathers: Pathways from prison to home.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 24 (2013): 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Julie Horney, D. Wayne Osgood, and Ineke Haen Marshall. “Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances.” American Sociological Review 60 (1995): 655–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mark W. Lipsey. “What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? ” In What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Guidelines from Research and Practice. Edited by James McGuire. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Craig Dowden, and Donald A. Andrews. “Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis.” Canadian Journal of Criminology 42 (2000): 449–67. [Google Scholar]
- Kevin A. Wright, Travis C. Pratt, Christoper T. Lowenkamp, and Edward J. Latessa. “The Systemic Model of Crime and Institutional Efficacy: An Analysis of the Social Context of Offender Reintegration.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 57 (2013): 92–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albert Bandura. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological Review 84 (1977): 191–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albert Bandura. “Human agency in social cognitive theory.” American Psychologist 44 (1989): 1175–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leonard M. Lopoo, and Bruce Western. “Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67 (2005): 721–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devah Pager. “The Mark of a Criminal Record.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (2003): 937–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruce Western. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Bruce Western, and Katherine Beckett. “How Unregulated Is the US Labor Market? The Penal System as a Labor Market Institution 1.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (1999): 1030–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert J. Sampson, John H. Laub, and Christopher Wimer. “Does Marriage Reduce Crime? A Counterfactual Approach to Within-Individual Causal Effects.” Criminology 44 (2006): 465–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marieke Liem. “Homicide offender recidivism: A review of the literature.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 18 (2013): 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marieke Liem, and Maarten Kunst. “Is there a recognizable post-incarceration syndrome among released ‘lifers’? ” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36 (2013): 333–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marieke Liem, and Nicholas J. Richardson. “The Role of Transformation Narratives in Desistance among Released Lifers.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 41 (2014): 692–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marieke Liem, Margaret A. Zahn, and Lisa Tichavsky. “Criminal recidivism among homicide offenders.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29 (2014): 2630–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Charles M. Unkovic, and Jospeph L. Albini. “The Lifer Speaks for Himself: An Analysis of the Assumed Homogeneity of Life-Termers.” Crime & Delinquency 15 (1969): 156–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massachusetts Department of Correction. “Block Brief: Offenders with Life Sentences.” 2005. Available online: http://www.mass.gov/eopss/docs/doc/research-reports/briefs-stats-bulletins/offenders-with-lifer-sentences-2.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2014). [Google Scholar]
- Lisa E. Brooks, Amy L. Solomon, Sinead Keegan, Rhiana Kohl, and Lori Lahue. “Prisoner Reentry in Massachusetts.” 2005. Available online: http://www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/411167_Prisoner_Reentry_MA.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2014).
- Catherine A. Appleton. Life after Life Imprisonment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Peggy Giordano, Monica A. Longmore, Ryan D. Schroeder, and Patrick M. Seffrin. “A Life-Course Perspective on Spirituality and Desistance from Crime.” Criminology 46 (2008): 99–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software, Version 10; Burlington: QSR International, 2012.
- U.S. Census Bureau. Median Age at First Marriage; Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011.
- Bruce A. Eddy, Melissa J. Powell, Margaret H. Szubka, Maura L. McCool, and Susan Kuntz. “Challenges in research with incarcerated parents and importance in violence prevention.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20 (2001): 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephen C. Richards, and Richard S. Jones. “Beating the perpetual incarceration machine: Overcoming structural impediments to re-entry.” In After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Edited by Shadd Maruna and Russell Immarigeon. Portland: Willan Publishing, 2004, pp. 201–31. [Google Scholar]
- Brendan Marsh. “Narrating Desistance: Identity Change and the 12-Step Script.” Irish Probation Journal 8 (2011): 49–68. [Google Scholar]
- Anthony Bottoms. “Desistance, social bonds, and human agency: A theoretical exploration.” In The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms, and Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 243–90. [Google Scholar]
- Michael Massoglia, and Christopher Uggen. “Settling down and aging out: Toward an interactionist theory of desistance and the transition to adulthood.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (2010): 543–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Natasha M. Ganem, and Robert Agnew. “Parenthood and adult criminal offending: The importance of relationship quality.” Journal of Criminal Justice 35 (2007): 630–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christoffer Carlsson. “Masculinities, persistence, and desistance.” Criminology 51 (2013): 661–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianca E. Bersani, John H. Laub, and Paul Nieuwbeerta. “Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter? ” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25 (2009): 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shadd Maruna, Russell Immarigeon, and Thomas P. LeBel. “Ex-offender reintegration: Theory and practice.” In After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Edited by Shadd Maruna and Russell Immarigeon. Portland: Willan Publishing, 2004, pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
- Dara Lee. “The Digital Scarlet Letter: The Effect of Online Criminal Records on Crime and Recidivism.” In Paper presented at the NBER Economics of Crime Working Group, Cambridge, MA, USA, 9–27 July 2012.
- Manuela Dudeck, Kirstin Drenkhahn, Carsten Spitzer, Sven Barnow, Daniel Kopp, Phillipp Kuwert, Harald J. Freyberger, and Frieder Dünkel. “Traumatization and mental distress in long-term prisoners in Europe.” Punishment & Society 13 (2011): 403–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kathleen Daly. “Women’s Pathways to Felony Court: Feminist Theories of Lawbreaking and Problems of Representation.” Review of Law and Women’s Studies 2 (1992): 11–52. [Google Scholar]
- Kathleen Daly, and Meda Chesney-Lind. “Feminism and criminology.” Justice Quarterly 5 (1988): 497–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emily J. Salisbury, and Patricia Van Voorhis. “Gendered Pathways A Quantitative Investigation of Women Probationers’ Paths to Incarceration.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 36 (2009): 541–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shawna Andersen. “Parole Decision-Making and Re-entry.” In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA, USA, 19–22 November 2014.
- Gresham Sykes. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1958, pp. 63–78. [Google Scholar]
- 1 The majority of the interviewees were convicted for second-degree murder or (in)voluntary manslaughter. In Massachusetts, individuals serving a life sentence for first-degree murder are not eligible for parole and hence, have not been included in our study. Second-degree murder refers to homicide with malicious intent but without premeditation or extreme cruelty. Voluntary manslaughter includes willful homicide with provocation or from excessive force, while involuntary manslaughter refers to non-willful homicide resulting from negligence.
- 2 For one person, the age at first parole was unknown.
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liem, M.; Garcin, J. Post-Release Success among Paroled Lifers. Laws 2014, 3, 798-823. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3040798
Liem M, Garcin J. Post-Release Success among Paroled Lifers. Laws. 2014; 3(4):798-823. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3040798
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiem, Marieke, and Jennifer Garcin. 2014. "Post-Release Success among Paroled Lifers" Laws 3, no. 4: 798-823. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3040798
APA StyleLiem, M., & Garcin, J. (2014). Post-Release Success among Paroled Lifers. Laws, 3(4), 798-823. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3040798