What Are Restorative Justice Services Recording? Qualitative Analysis of Six Restorative Justice Reporting Templates for Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Registration of commissioned services;
- Standardise the sharing of information;
- Improving quality through effective monitoring and evaluation;
- Publication of a new Action Plan;
- Reviewing ring-fenced funding for restorative justice practice;
- Explore automatic rights for victims through the Victim’s Law;
- End to blanket bans;
- More and better communications;
- Government minister with specific responsibility for restorative justice.
1.1. Restorative Practice and Restorative Justice Defined
1.2. Recording, Monitoring and Accountability
- Number of referrals;
- Number of new cases;
- Case referral outcomes;
- RJ outputs;
- Victims supported;
- Outcomes related to impact on victims;
- Satisfaction.
- Participation;
- Engagement;
- Satisfaction;
- Restoration;
- Reducing recidivism.
- Relationship focused;
- Comprehensive/holistic;
- Contextual/flexible;
- Subsidiarity, inclusion, and participation;
- Dialogical or communicative;
- Democratic/deliberative;
- Forward-focused, solution-focused, and remedial.
2. Method
- Timeline of case progression;
- Outputs and outcomes;
- Demographics;
- Service accountability;
- The language of crime.
3. Analysis
3.1. Overview of Templates
3.1.1. Presentation and Format
3.1.2. Contents and Data Types
3.2. Timeline of Case Progression
3.2.1. Referrals
3.2.2. Contact, Engagement, Participation, Conversion and Attrition
3.2.3. Case Status
3.2.4. Intervention, Process, and Activity
3.2.5. Signposting and Onward Referrals
3.3. Outcomes and Outputs
3.4. Demographics
3.5. Service Accountability
3.6. The Language of Crime
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- All Party Parliamentary Group on Restorative Justice. 2021. Restorative Justice APPG Inquiry into Restorative Practices in 2021/2022: Report on the Inquiry into Restorative Practices in 2021/2022. London: All Party Parliamentary Group on Restorative Justice. Available online: https://rjappg.co.uk/inquiryreport/ (accessed on 1 October 2021).
- All Party Parliamentary Group on Restorative Justice. 2022. Restorative Justice Briefing Papers. London: All Party Parliamentary Group on Restorative Justice. Available online: https://rjappg.co.uk/briefing-papers/ (accessed on 18 January 2023).
- Anfara, Vincent A., Jr., Katherine R. Evans, and Jessica N. Lester. 2013. Restorative Justice in Education: What We Know so Far. Middle School Journal 44: 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, Paul A., and Amanda Coffey. 2004. Analysing documentary realities. In Qualitative Research. Edited by David Silverman. London: Sage, pp. 77–92. [Google Scholar]
- Banwell-Moore, Rebecca. 2022. Just an ‘optional extra’ in the ‘victim toolkit’?: The culture, mechanisms and approaches of criminal justice organisations delivering restorative justice in England and Wales. International Review of Victimology, Online First. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazemore, Gordon, and Diane L. Green. 2007. “Yardsticks” for Victim Sensitive Process: Principle-Based Standards for Gauging the Integrity of Restorative Justice Process. Victims & Offenders 2: 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolitho, Jane. 2017. Inside the restorative justice black box: The role of memory reconsolidation in transforming the emotional impact of violent crime on victims. International Review of Victimology 23: 233–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bowen, Glen A. 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9: 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boyes-Watson, Carolyn. 2018. Looking at the past of restorative justice. Normative reflections on its future. In Routledge International Handbook of Restorative Justice. Edited by Theo Gavrielides. London: Routledge, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calkin, Charlotte. 2021. An Exploratory Study of Understandings and Experiences of Implementing Restorative Practice in Three UK Prisons. British Journal of Community Justice 17: 92–111. Available online: https://search-ebscohost-com.glos.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=150267837&site=ehost-live&scope=site (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Campbell, Catriona, Roisin Devlin, David O’Mahony, Jonathan Doak, John Jackson, Tanya Corrigan, and Kieran McEvoy. 2006. Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth Conferencing Service. Belfast: Statistics and Research Branch of the Northern Ireland Office. Available online: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/13465/1/Evaluation%20of%20the%20Northern%20Ireland%20Youth%20Conference%20Service.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Carter, Stacy M. 2005. Tobacco document research reporting. Tobacco Control 14: 368–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chicago Public Schools. 2017. Restorative Practices Guide and Toolkit. Chicago: Office of Social and Emotional Learning. Available online: https://blog.cps.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/CPS_RP_Booklet.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Clamp, Kerry. 2022. RJ and the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime. A Scoping Review of Service Provision in England and Wales. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Available online: https://www.aarj.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/PCC-research-report-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Clamp, Kerry, Elena Genova, and Will Paterson. 2022. Narrating the Restorative Justice Offer. An Analysis of Informational Materials Used in England and Wales. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Available online: https://www.aarj.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Research-report-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Criminal Justice System. 2004. Best Practice Guidance for Restorative Practitioners and their Case Supervisors and Line Managers and Conclusions and Recommendations of the Training and Accreditation Policy Group; London: Criminal Justice System. Available online: https://www.iirp.edu/images/pdf/Best%20Practice%20Guidance%20for%20Restorative%20Practitioners%20(Home%20Office%20-%20Dec%202004).pdf (accessed on 11 October 2022).
- Crown Prosecution Service. 2019. Restorative Justice; London: UK Government. Available online: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/restorative-justice (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Doak, Jonathan, and David O’Mahony. 2018. Evaluating the success of restorative justice conferencing: A values-based approach. In Routledge International Handbook of Restorative Justice. Edited by Theo Gavrielides. London: Routledge, pp. 211–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Doolin, Katherine. 2007. But what does it mean? Seeking definitional clarity in restorative justice. Journal of Criminal Law 71: 427–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gorsky, Martin, and Alex Mold. 2020. Documentary Analysis. In Qualitative Research in Health Care, 4th ed. Edited by Catherine Pope and Nicholas Mays. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Gregory, Anne, and Katherine R. Evans. 2020. The Starts and Stumbles of Restorative Justice in Education: Where Do We Go from Here? Boulder: National Education Policy Center. Available online: http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/restorative-justice (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Hamad, Rania, Joanna Shapland, Steve Kirkwood, Catherine Bisset, and Ella Edginton. 2020. Designing and Implementing Restorative Justice in Scotland. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Available online: https://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/sites/default/files/assets/pdf/Restorative_Justice_Toolkit_121020-min.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Harris, Julie, Moreblessing Tinarwo, and Ram Ramanathan. 2020. Leeds Partners in Practice: Reimagining Child Welfare Services for the 21st Century: Final Evaluation Report; London: Department for Education. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/932340/Leeds_Partners_in_Practice.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Hoyle, Carolyn, Richard P. Young, and Roderick Hill. 2002. Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Valley Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning. York: York Publishing Services for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available online: https://www.jrf.org.uk/file/36675/download?token=oKs3wZCx&filetype=full-report (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Kearney, Niall, Steve Kirkwood, and Lucinda MacFarlane. 2007. Restorative Justice (Diversion) Services Monitoring and Evaluation Report 2006/2007. Edinburgh: SACRO. Available online: https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/9847932/KIRKWOOD_2007_report.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2022).
- Llewellyn, Jennifer J., Bruce P. Archibald, Don Clairmont, and Diane Crocker. 2013. Imagining Success for a Restorative Approach to Justice: Implications for Measurement and Evaluation. Dalhousie Law Journal 36: 282–316. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/288305365.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Lanterman, Jennifer L. 2020. Training partner selection and quality assurance in restorative justice for the criminal justice setting. Contemporary Justice Review 23: 544–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lanterman, Jennifer L. 2021. Models versus mechanisms: The need to crack the black box of restorative justice. British Journal of Community Justice 17: 60–77. Available online: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=150267835&site=ehost-live&scope=site (accessed on 9 January 2022).
- Lustica, Hennessey, Joseph Fantigrossi, and Jesse Strazzabosco. 2020. Restorative Practice Toolkit. Edited by B. Peck. New York: Wayne County Partnership for Strengthening Families and Finger Lake Community Schools. Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d12417fb10a1b00019d3b4d/t/5f3e8d3d294cbf131e9a5497/1597934918437/Restorative+Toolkit.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Marshall, Tony. 1999. Restorative Justice: An Overview. London: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate. Available online: http://www.antoniocasella.eu/restorative/Marshall_1999-b.pdf (accessed on 11 October 2022).
- Mason, Paul, Harry Ferguson, Kate Morris, Tony Munton, and Robin Sen. 2017. Leeds Family Valued Evaluation Report; London: Department for Education. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/625222/Leeds_Family_Valued_-_Evaluation_report.pdf (accessed on 11 October 2022).
- McCold, Paul, and Ted Wachtel. 2003. In Pursuit of Paradigm: A Theory of Restorative Justice. Paper presented at the XIII World Congress of Criminology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 10–15; Available online: https://www.iirp.edu/pdf/paradigm.pdf (accessed on 11 October 2022).
- Ministry of Justice. 2014. Restorative Justice Action Plan for the Criminal Justice System, November 2014. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/375581/restorative-justice-action-plan-2014.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- O’Dwyer, Kieran. 2014. Towards Excellence in Restorative Practice—A Quality Assurance Framework for Organisations and Practitioners. Dublin: Restorative Practices Strategic Forum. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10147/596323 (accessed on 11 October 2022).
- O’Mahony, David, and Jonathan Doak. 2017. Reimagining Restorative Justice: Agency and Accountability in the Criminal Process. London: Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar]
- Padgett, Deborah K. 2016. Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research, 3rd ed. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Pali, Brunilda, and Giuseppe Maglione. 2021. Discursive representations of restorative justice in international policies. European Journal of Criminology, Online First. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, Gregory D., and Ian M. Borton. 2017. Toward a Communication Perspective of Restorative Justice: Implications for Research, Facilitation, and Assessment. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 10: 199–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Presser, Lois, and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2002. Values and Evaluation: Assessing Processes and Outcomes of Restorative Justice Programs. Crime & Delinquency 48: 162–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Restorative Justice Council. 2016a. About the RJC. Available online: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/about-rjc (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Restorative Justice Council. 2016b. RJC Service Providers Handbook. Available online: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/SP%20handbook%20A5_0.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Restorative Justice Council. 2020a. Service Provider Code of Practice. Available online: https://rjc.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Service%20Provider%20Code%20of%20Practice%20-%202020.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Restorative Justice Council. 2020b. Service Provider Registration Framework. Available online: https://rjc.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Registered%20Service%20Provider%20Framework.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Restorative Justice Council. 2020c. Training Provider Code of Practice. Available online: https://rjc.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Training%20Provider%20Code%20of%20Practice%20-%202020_0.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Roche, Declan. 2003. Accountability in Restorative Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Scottish Government. 2017. Guidance for the Delivery of Restorative Justice in Scotland; Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Available online: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2017/10/8454 (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Shapland, Joanna. 2014. Monitoring and Evaluation of Restorative Justice. In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Edited by Gerben Bruinsma and David Weisburd. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapland, Joanna. 2022. Evaluating Restorative Justice—According to Its Aims. In The Impact of Restorative Justice. Edited by Emily Molinari and Silvia Randazzo. Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice. Available online: https://www.euforumrj.org/en/evaluating-restorative-justice-according-its-aims (accessed on 9 January 2023).
- Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Emily Colledge, James Dignan, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Rachel Pennant, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. 2004. Implementing Restorative Justice Schemes (Crime Reduction Programme): A Report on the First Year. Home Office Online Report 32/04. London: Home Office. Available online: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Implementing%20restorative%20justice%20schemes%20-%20an%20evaluation%20of%20the%20first%20year.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, Becca Chapman, Emily Colledge, James Dignan, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. 2006. Restorative Justice in Practice: Findings from the Second Stage of the Evaluation of Three Schemes. Home Office Research Findings 274. London: Home Office. Available online: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Full%20report.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, Becca Chapman, James Dignan, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. 2007. Restorative Justice: The Views of Victims and Offenders. Ministry of Justice Research Series 3/07. London: MoJ. Available online: https://www.oijj.org/sites/default/files/documentos/documental_6425_en.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, James Dignan, Lucy Edwards, Jeremy Hibbert, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. 2008. Does Restorative Justice Affect Reconviction? The Fourth Report from the Evaluation of Three Schemes. Ministry of Justice Research Series 10(08). Available online: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Does%20restorative%20justice%20affect%20reconviction.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Shapland, Joanna, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. 2011. Restorative Justice in Practice: Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders. Cullompton: Willan. [Google Scholar]
- Shapland, Joanna, Jamie Buchan, Steve Kirkwood, and Estelle Zinsstag. 2022. Mitigation and Risk in Restorative Justice. Report to the Scottish Government. Available online: https://communityjustice.scot/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Mitigation-and-Risk-in-Restorative-Justice.pdf (accessed on 9 January 2023).
- Sherman, Lawrence W., Heather Strang, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Daniel J. Woods, and Barak Ariel. 2015. Are restorative justice conferences effective in reducing repeat offending? Findings from a Campbell systematic review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31: 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skills Sector Council. 2013. National Occupational Standards Restorative Practice. Skills for Justice. Available online: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/NOS%20Restorative%20Practice.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Strang, Heather, Lawrence W. Sherman, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Daniel J. Woods, and Barak Ariel. 2013. Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) using face-to-face meetings of offenders and victims: Effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction. A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 9: 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sussex Police. 2020. Restorative Justice Policy (1198/2020). Available online: https://www.sussex.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/foi-media/sussex/policies/restorative-justice-policy-11982020.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- The 2018 Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec. 2018. Concerning Restorative Justice in Criminal Matters. Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/prison/home/-/asset_publisher/ky2olXXXogcx/content/recommendation-cm-rec-2018-8 (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Umbreit, Mark S. 1999. Avoiding the marginalization and “McDonaldization” of victim offender mediation: A case study in moving toward the mainstream. In Restorative Juvenile Justice. Edited by Gordon Bazemore and Lode Walgrave. New York: Criminal Justice Press. [Google Scholar]
- Umbreit, Mark S., Robert B. Coates, and Betty Vos. 2002. The Impact of Restorative Justice Conferencing: A Review of 63 Empirical Studies in 5 Countries. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota. Available online: http://www.antoniocasella.eu/restorative/Umbreit_impact_2002.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2022).
- Van Camp, Tinneke, and Jo-Anne Wemmers. 2013. Victim satisfaction with restorative justice: More than simply procedural justice. International Review of Victimology 19: 117–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Ness, Daniel W., and Karen H. Strong. 2015. Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice, 5th ed. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Velez, Gabriel, Antonio Butler, Madeline Hahn, and Kennedy Latham. 2021. Opportunities and Challenges in the Age of COVID-19: Comparing Virtual Approaches with Circles in Schools and Communities. In Comparative Restorative Justice. Edited by Theo Gavrielides. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachtel, Ted. 2016. Defining Restorative. Bethlehem: International Institute for Restorative Practices. Available online: https://www.iirp.edu/pdf/Defining-Restorative.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Why Me? 2016. Valuing Victims. A Review Of Police and Crime Commissioners’ Funding of Restorative Justice 2013–2016. Available online: https://www.why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Valuing-Victims-Report-July-2017-Update.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Why Me? 2017a. Valuing Victims (Part I) a Review of Police and Crime Commissioners’ Funding of Restorative Justice Since 2013–2017. Available online: https://why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Why-me-Valuing-Victims-2017-Report_Part-I.-Final-docx.doc.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Why Me? 2017b. Valuing Victims (Part II) a Review of Police and Crime Commissioners’ Funding of Restorative Justice: Evaluation and Monitoring. Available online: https://why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Why-me-Valuing-Victims-2017-Report_Part-Il_FINAL-docx.doc.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Why Me? 2020. Valuing Victims: A Review of Police and Crime Commissioners’ Delivery of Restorative Justice 2018/2019. Available online: https://why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Why-me-Restorative-Justice-Valuing-Victims-Report-2020.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Why Me? 2021. Valuing Victims: A Review of Police and Crime Commissioners’ Delivery of Restorative Justice 2019/2020. Available online: https://why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Why-Me-Valuing-Victims-2021-v6.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Why Me? 2022. Valuing Victims: A Review of Police and Crime Commissioners’ Delivery of Restorative Justice 2020/2021—Victims of Crime Deserve Better. Available online: https://why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Why-Me-Valuing-Victims-2022-1.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Wood, William R. 2020. The indecent demands of accountability: Trauma, marginalisation, and moral agency in youth restorative conferencing. The International Journal of Restorative Justice 3: 168–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, William R., and Masahiro Suzuki. 2016. Four challenges in the future of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders 11: 149–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zehr, Howard. 2002. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Intercourse: Good Books. [Google Scholar]
Referral | Progress | Case Status | Intervention |
---|---|---|---|
Number of referrals | Contact | Active/ On-going | Intervention |
Number of new referrals | Engagement/ Participation | Closed | Activity |
Number of new referrals accepted | Attrition/ Conversion | Completed | Process |
Area of Language Variation | Example(s) |
---|---|
Declined/Rejected |
|
Referral source |
|
Offence/Crime type |
|
Area of Language Variation | Example(s) |
---|---|
Participation |
|
Contact/Engagement |
|
Conversion |
|
Attrition |
|
Area of Language Variation | Example(s) |
---|---|
Active/On-going |
|
Closed/Completed |
|
Area of Language Variation | Example(s) |
---|---|
Intervention |
|
Process |
|
Activity |
|
Area of Language Variation | Example(s) |
---|---|
Feedback and Satisfaction (cases closed in period only)/Victim Outcomes (T1) |
|
Feedback and Satisfaction/Victim Outcomes Distance Travelled/RJ Outcomes this period for closed cases (T2) |
|
Feedback and Outcomes (T3) |
|
RJ Activity/Victim Outcome/Feedback and Satisfaction (T4) |
|
RJ Outcome Measures (T5) |
“Satisfaction with outcome of intervention”; “Satisfaction with RJ service”. |
RJ Process (T6) |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fisk, B.M. What Are Restorative Justice Services Recording? Qualitative Analysis of Six Restorative Justice Reporting Templates for Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England. Laws 2023, 12, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12020028
Fisk BM. What Are Restorative Justice Services Recording? Qualitative Analysis of Six Restorative Justice Reporting Templates for Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England. Laws. 2023; 12(2):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12020028
Chicago/Turabian StyleFisk, Benjamin M. 2023. "What Are Restorative Justice Services Recording? Qualitative Analysis of Six Restorative Justice Reporting Templates for Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner in England" Laws 12, no. 2: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12020028