Next Article in Journal
Environmental Heterogeneity and Altitudinal Gradients Drive Darkling Beetle Diversity in an Alluvial Fan
Next Article in Special Issue
Intake of Pyriproxyfen Through Contaminated Food by the Predator Ceraeochrysa claveri Navás, 1911 (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Evaluation of Long-Term Effects on Testes via Transcriptome Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Shape as a Key to Taxonomy: Morphometric Analysis of Tetropium Species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of the Combination of λ-Cyhalothrin and Chlorantraniliprole Against Four Key Storage Pests

by
Waqas Wakil
1,2,*,
Nickolas G. Kavallieratos
3,*,
Aqsa Naeem
1,
Hamza Jamil
1,
Demeter Lorentha S. Gidari
3 and
Maria C. Boukouvala
3
1
Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
2
Senckenberg German Entomological Institute, D-15374 Müncheberg, Germany
3
Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(4), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040387
Submission received: 13 February 2025 / Revised: 25 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 March 2025 / Published: 4 April 2025

Simple Summary

The present study evaluated the effectiveness of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole against Trogoderma granarium, Tribolium castaneum, Rhyzopertha dominica, and Sitophilus oryzae, on treated wheat, rice, and maize. Sitophilus oryzae and R. dominica were the most susceptible species in both laboratory and persistence trials. The progeny production of S. oryzae and R. dominica was almost suppressed in laboratory trials on 5 ppm-treated wheat and persistence bioassays, 30 days post-storage. Trogoderma granarium and T. castaneum were less affected by the tested insecticidal combination, suffering lower mortality rates and producing higher progeny, compared to S. oryzae and R. dominica. Concerning the different commodities, treated wheat led to higher mortalities and lower progeny vs. rice and maize. These findings demonstrate that the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole is effective under testing of different parameters, such as the type of the grain commodity or insect species.

Abstract

With over 1000 species of pests causing losses in both the quantity and quality of stored food, insect contamination poses significant challenges. The present study assesses the efficacy of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole against four key storage pests—Trogoderma granarium, Sitophilus oryzae, Rhyzopertha dominica, and Tribolium castaneum. Laboratory bioassays demonstrated species-dependent mortality, with S. oryzae and R. dominica suffering 100% mortality in several tested scenarios. A 90-day persistence trial revealed decreased efficacy over time, especially for T. granarium (32.0–71.4% at 0 days and 0.0–7.5% at 90 days) and T. castaneum (38.8–82.7% at 0 days and 0.0–12.7% at 90 days) vs. S. oryzae and R. dominica. Progeny production of S. oryzae and R. dominica was almost suppressed in persistence trials (0.4 individuals per vial and 1 individual per vial, respectively) after 30 days of storage at the dose of 5 mg/kg wheat. The results highlight the variability in insecticidal performance based on species, dose, exposure, and commodity type, emphasizing the need for tailored pest management strategies in the storage environment.

1. Introduction

Insect infestation in food industries is a serious issue of concern. Over a thousand species of pests attack stored products, causing both qualitative and quantitative losses (9% in developed countries while >20% in developing countries) in storage facilities [1,2]. Among them, coleopterans such as the dermestid Trogoderma granarium (Everts), the bostrychid Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), the tenebrionid Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), and the curculionid Sitophilus oryzae (L.) cause several types of damages in wheat, sorghum, maize, barley, rice and other stored grains [3,4,5]. All 4 species belong to the 7 most destructive species out of the 18 listed stored grain insect pests in Punjab, Pakistan [6].
Trogoderma granarium, one of the most damaging pests of stored grains, degrades grains and other commodities, rendering the infested products unfit for human consumption. It can be easily spread through the movement of products around the world, lying undetected as adults, eggs, and larvae (diapausing or not). To prevent its importation, several countries have strong quarantine laws in place, and exports from countries with established populations are subjected to limitations and controls [7]. Rhyzopertha dominica is a primary pest of cereal commodities in many regions of the world, including tropical and subtropical regions [8,9]. The direct feeding activity of the voracious larvae and adults on the germ and endosperm of the cereal leads to elevated grain losses [10]. The cosmopolitan stored-product pest T. castaneum has the capacity to infest 246 grain commodities [2,11], causing severe economic losses. For instance, it causes up to 50% of the economic losses of cocoa beans worldwide [12]. Sitophilus oryzae is one of the most important species of stored products [2,13] and is difficult to control. This is because the immature stages develop inside grain kernels, which hinders the accurate detection of infestations and the effectiveness of control measures [3].
The halogenated type II pyrethroid λ-cyhalothrin [14] is recognized as an effective insecticide against numerous insect species, including stored-product pests [15,16,17,18,19]. It acts through the neurotoxic action on the sensory nerves, altering the passage characteristics of voltage-sensitive sodium channels [20]. It also interferes in calcium and chloride channels, disrupting further nerve activity. It quickly impairs muscular control, prevents food consumption, and leads to death, since it can easily be absorbed by biological tissues and penetrates the cuticle of the insect [21,22,23].
Anthranilic diamide insecticides are novel systemic insecticides. They act by enhancing the uncontrollably released calcium in insects through the activation of their ryanodine receptor, leading to rapid muscle disfunction, paralysis, and death [24,25]. Among them, chlorantraniliprole exhibits a low toxicity to mammals and is effective in controlling numerous insect pests without endangering beneficial species [24,26,27,28]. Furthermore, chlorantraniliprole has low intrinsic toxicity towards beneficial arthropods and non-target species, like earthworms, honeybees, and other pollinators [29,30,31,32,33]. Concerning λ-cyhalothrin, it is toxic to honeybees, demonstrating side effects even in sublethal concentrations [34,35]. Nevertheless, λ-cyhalothrin exhibited a low suppression rate on soil microbial respiration, which fully recovered in less than one month [36].
Pyrethroids, carbamates, and organophosphates are among the various insecticide types that have been widely used in the protection of stored products [37]. Previous investigations have demonstrated their long-term residual activity against a broad range of stored-product species [38,39,40,41,42]. However, because of the prolonged and continuous use of numerous insecticidal active ingredients, many species have developed resistance, leading to inadequate utilization [43,44,45]. Alternative management strategies have been used to deal with this developed resistance, such as combining insecticides with various modes of action. For instance, Nayak and Daglish [46] revealed that the spinosad + chlorpyrifos-methyl combination provided complete control of four storage psocid pests belonging to genus Liposcelis. The residual efficacy of aerosols containing 1% pyrethrin + methoprene and 3% pyrethrin + methoprene was tested against T. castaneum and Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). The results show that both combinations achieved the residual control of both species, with T. castaneum being the most susceptible [47]. Moreover, the combination of chlorpyrifos-methyl (3 ppm) and deltamethrin (0.5 ppm) achieved control on R. dominica and T. castaneum adults both resistant and susceptible to phosphine [48]. Additionally, Wakil et al. [49] examined the application of the corresponding combined pairs of Metarhizium robertsii J.F. Bisch., Rehner & Humber (Clavicipitaceae), an entomopathogenic fungus (EPF), the Protect-It diatomaceous earth (DE), and λ-cyhalothrin against R. dominica, T. castaneum, and T. granarium. For all examined insect species, the combination of the DE + λ-cyhalothrin was the most effective treatment of mortality in laboratory trials on persistence and progeny production, followed by the combinations of the entomopathogenic fungi + λ-cyhalothrin and entomopathogenic fungi + DE.
Both λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole have been evaluated against various stored product species belonging to different orders, such as Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Psocoptera [19,50,51,52,53]. However, there are no data concerning their combined use against stored-product pests. The current study evaluates the efficacy of a λ-cyhalothrin + chlorantraniliprole combination against four serious insect pests in storage facilities under various parameters, i.e., commodities, doses, and exposure intervals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tested Commodities

All commodities used for the trials were free of infestation and insecticides. Oryza sativa L. (var. Kainat Basmati) rice, Zea mays L. (var. DK-6525) maize, and Triticum aestivum L. (var. Noor 2013) wheat were the commodities being tested. Rice (11.2%), maize (12.5%), and wheat (11.5%) were evaluated for their moisture content using the GAC 2700-AGRI (Dickey-John Co., Auburn, IL, USA) moisture meter. The commodities under trial were sieved to eliminate contaminants and dockage before any treatment.

2.2. Tested Insects

The Microbial Control Laboratory at the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, provided the insect populations used in this study. For more than a decade, these insect populations had been reared without any contact with insecticides, at 30 °C, in 65% relative humidity (RH) and total darkness. Apart from T. castaneum, which was reared on wheat flour with 5% brewer’s yeast, the other three insect species were reared on whole wheat. For T. granarium, adults under 24 h old and of mixed sex were used. Adults of T. castaneum, S. oryzae, and R. dominica (of mixed sex) younger than two weeks were also used [54].

2.3. Insecticide

Laboratory and persistence treatment bioassays were conducted using Ampligo 150 ZC (Syngenta, Karachi, Punjab, Pakistan), a suspension concentrate (SC) that contained 50 g/L λ-cyhalothrin and 100 g/L chlorantraniliprole.

2.4. Laboratory Bioassays

The combination of λ-cyhalothrin + chlorantraniliprole was used in solution form at a dose rate of 0.01 mg/kg grain (containing 0.0005 mg λ-cyhalothrin and 0.001 mg chlorantraniliprole), 0.1 mg/kg grain (containing 0.005 mg λ-cyhalothrin and 0.01 mg chlorantraniliprole), 1 mg/kg grain (containing 0.05 mg λ-cyhalothrin and 0.1 mg chlorantraniliprole), and 5 mg/kg grain (containing 0.25 mg λ-cyhalothrin and 0.5 mg chlorantraniliprole), based on doses previously used [49,50]. Using trays, 1000 g of each grain, spread out on a tray, was sprayed with a 1 mL aqueous solution that contained the appropriate quantity of the insecticide for each dose. The spraying process was carried out with the help of a G233 airbrush (Master Airbrush, North Las Vegas, NV, USA). Additionally, a control group for each tested commodity was submitted to 1 mL distilled water treatment by using another airbrush reserved for the control groups. For each process of spraying, different trays were cast off. Each treated grain stack was kept separate in glass jars of 5 L and shaken (by hand) for at least 10 min to attain a uniform distribution of tested insecticide on all grain mass [55]. From each untreated or treated lot, a triad of samples weighing 20 g was placed in glass vials that were 7.5 cm in diameter and 12.5 cm in height. Each glass jar included a separate scoop that was used to collect samples. An ELB 300 e-balance (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to weigh the samples on a fine paper layer. Every weighing session used a new paper layer. At the closure of each vial, there was a gauze-covered hole of 1.5 cm in diameter to provide adequate aeration. Every single vial contained 50 adults of each species. To prevent the individuals from absconding, a layer of polytetrafluoroethylene (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany) entirely covered the inside neck of the glass vials. The vials were maintained in incubators with 65% RH and 30 °C throughout the entire experiment. The adult mortality of each insect species was determined by prodding each insect gently with a different brush, per dose/formulation and control, under a Leica stereomicroscope (Wild M3B, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) after 7 and 14 days of exposure. For every exposure interval, different individuals, commodities, and vials were used. The progeny production of all tested insects was also assessed. After the 14-day mortality count, all individuals contained in vials were discarded, and all vials were reinserted into the incubators. The offspring production was assessed after 62 days for R. dominica and T. castaneum, 46 days for T. granarium, and 60 days for S. oryzae [56,57]. For T. granarium and T. castaneum, immature stages and adults were recorded for the evaluation of progeny, while for R. dominica and S. oryzae, only adults were taken under observation, since their immature stages grow inside kernels [2]. Three iterations of the trials were conducted by using new individuals, commodities, and vials.

2.5. Persistance Bioassays

Throughout a period of three months, four laboratory trials (0, 30, 60, and 90 days) were conducted to assess the effects of four dose treatments in three commodities as well as the control groups, at 30 °C and 65% RH, as mentioned above. The glass jars under trial were kept in the incubator at the same temperature and RH for the entire observational period [54,57]. After seven days of exposure to the insecticide, the mortality rates of every insect were assessed, and the production of offspring was evaluated as previously mentioned.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The control mortality was low (<5%) for all tested species. For laboratory mortalities, an Abbott’s correcting mortality formula was used [58]. Before analysis, all data were converted to log (x + 1) [59] for normal variance. All data were subjected to 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with exposure interval, dose rate and commodities as main effects, and mortality as the response variable. Interactions among all main effects were also considered in the analysis. Similarly, all data of progeny production for laboratory trials were subjected to 3-way ANOVA. For progeny production, the main effects were dose rates, commodities and insect species, while progeny number was the response variable. The interactions of all main effects in progeny were also included during analysis. To make a comparison among means in progeny and mortality, a Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05 was performed [60]. In the case of persistence bioassays, the Abbott’s formula was used for the correction of mortality [58]. The data were converted to log (x + 1) to regulate the variance prior to analysis [59]. Data were subjected to 2-way ANOVA for each tested insect species. For analysis, all main effects (period of storage and dose rate) and response variables (mortality) along with their associated interactions were considered. For the persistence of progeny production, all main effects (period of storage and dose rate) and the response variable (progeny number) along with their associated interactions were subjected to a 2-way ANOVA. Tukey HSD test set at p = 0.05 was used to compare the means in mortality and progeny production [60].

3. Results

3.1. Mortality in Laboratory Bioassays

For all tested species, all main effects were significant (Table 1). The commodity × exposure interval interaction was not significant for R. dominica, while commodity × dose rate and exposure interval × dose rate interactions were significant for R. dominica and T. granarium, respectively. Commodity × exposure interval × dose rate interaction was significant for S. oryzae and R. dominica (Table 1). Among all commodities, the highest mortality rates were obtained on treated wheat for all tested species, regardless of time interval and dose rate (Table 2). The dose of 5 mg/kg grain of the formulation achieved complete mortality in S. oryzae and R. dominica adults on treated wheat and rice, 14 days post-exposure, while maize led to 94.8 and 91.1% mortality, respectively. The second highest mortality rate (95.9%) has been noted for T. castaneum at 5 mg/kg grain-treated wheat after 14 days of exposure. However, rice and maize scored mortality rates <85%. Regarding T. granarium, the highest mortality rate observed on 5 mg/kg grain-treated wheat did not exceed 88% after 14 days of exposure (Table 2).

3.2. Progeny in Laboratory Bioassays

For the progeny production, all main effects along with their associated interactions were significant (Table 3). The progeny production of S. oryzae was <1 individual/vial on 1 mg/kg grain-treated wheat and 5 mg/kg grain-treated wheat and rice. Regardless of the dose rate, treated maize led to higher progeny production compared to the other commodities. A remarkable reduction in progeny production was noted for R. dominica on treated wheat and rice compared to the respective control groups. The progeny production number was less than 1 individual/vial for R. dominica on 5 mg/kg grain-treated wheat. The progeny production of T. castaneum was significantly reduced, even at 0.01 mg/kg grain of the formulation on all treated commodities, compared to the control groups (28.0 vs. 88.6 individuals/vial on wheat, 33.7 vs. 64.1 individuals/vial on maize, and 20.1 vs. 39.4 individuals/vial on rice). Concerning T. granarium and regardless of the dose rate or the treated grain, progeny production was noted to be the least affected among all tested species (Table 4).

3.3. Mortality in Persistence Bioassays

In laboratory persistence trials and seven days post-exposure, all main effects along with their associated interactions were significant for all tested species (Table 5). The highest mortality rates were noted for S. oryzae and R. dominica at a 5 mg/kg grain dose at 0 days of storage, achieving 94.2 and 87.4%, respectively. After 30 days of storage at 5 mg/kg grain dose, mortality rates were significantly reduced but remained higher than 60% (68.7 and 61.3%, respectively). Lower mortality rates were noted for T. castaneum and T. granarium during the whole period of storage, with values of 53.6 and 46.8%, respectively, at a 5 mg/kg grain dose after 30 days of storage (Table 6).

3.4. Progeny in Persistence Bioassays

All main effects along with their interactions significantly impacted progeny production in persistence bioassays (Table 7). The dose of 5 mg/kg grain almost suppressed progeny production of all four tested species at 0 days (0.4–0.9 individuals per vial), and for S. oryzae or R. dominica at 30 days (0.4 and 1.0 individuals per vial, respectively). Also, for S. oryzae, the dose of 1 mg/kg grain-treated wheat at 0 and 30 days of storage almost suppressed progeny production. Regarding T. granarium, at 5 mg/kg grain dose rate, the progeny mean number reached 9.7 individuals per vial at 30 days of storage but progressively increased to 23.9 individuals per vial at 90 days. The progeny production of T. castaneum ranged from 3.1 to 17.7 (5 mg/kg grain) (Table 8).

4. Discussion

The current study offers various biotic and abiotic parameter-dependent results. λ-Cyhalothrin + chlorantraniliprole demonstrated high efficacy in controlling S. oryzae and R. dominica. Tribolium castaneum and T. granarium showed lower susceptibility, especially on maize and rice compared to wheat. Progeny production was significantly reduced for S. oryzae and R. dominica on all grains tested at higher doses (1 and 5 mg/kg grain) compared to the control groups. Regarding the persistence trials, mortality rates declined over time for all species, being more vigorous for T. castaneum and T. granarium. The suppression of progeny production for S. oryzae and R. dominica remained at 5 mg/kg grain after 30 days, although progeny increased at longer storage periods.
By examining λ-cyhalothrin at 1.25 mg a.i./kg wheat, Wakil et al. [49] reported 49.1, 41.7, and 57.2% mortalities for T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica, respectively, after 14 days of exposure. In contrast, the present study achieved 95.9, 87.3, and 100% mortalities, respectively, with just 0.25 mg a.i./kg in a combined insecticidal treatment. Similarly, for the progeny production, Wakil et al. [49] recorded 49.6, 72.5, and 56.3 individuals/vial, which values are notably higher compared to the current study (7.7, 13.5, and 0.7 individuals/vial). Chlorantraniliprole at 1 mg a.i./kg (WG and SC formulations) caused 63.3 and 36.7% mortality in R. dominica, respectively, and 71.1 and 70.1% in S. oryzae, respectively, after 14 days of exposure [50]. In contrast, using half that dose, the tested combination of the present study achieved 100% mortality of both species. Regarding progeny production, Kavallieratos et al. [50] recorded no fewer than eight and one individuals/vial for R. dominica and S. oryzae, respectively, whereas in this study, the progeny productions of both species were almost suppressed (less than one individual/vial). Based on those previous studies, it becomes evident that both λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole are effective against various stored-product pests at specific dose rates. Interestingly, the current study highlighted that the tested combination is effective at remarkably lower concentrations, suggesting also that their combination exhibits additive effects against S. oryzae and R. dominica. In several cases, when pyrethroids are combined with organophosphate insecticides, they lead to additive or synergistic effects [61,62,63,64,65]. In the present case, the exact mode of action of the combination of the pyrethroid λ-cyhalothrin and the anthranilic diamide chlorantraniliprole has not been investigated. Generally, when one insecticide in the mixture obstructs the metabolic detoxification of the other insecticide, the toxicity of the latter is increased, explaining the additive effects of the insecticidal combinations [65,66].
The control of S. oryzae and R. dominica is often challenging as most of their developmental stages grow inside the kernels [67]. Females of R. dominica deposit eggs on the surface of the grain [8], and the first-instar larva either penetrates the outer surface directly or enters through a crack or opening consuming the kernel. Females of S. oryzae oviposit inside the kernel, where all the developmental stages grow [67]. A very compelling result of the current study concerns the complete mortality of S. oryzae and R. dominica at 5 mg formulation/kg wheat or rice 14 days post-exposure, along with their almost suppressed progeny production, as well as their susceptibility in persistence trials. Concerning T. castaneum and T. granarium, even though their mortality rates did not exceed 55%, the progeny production remained at <10 individuals/vial. The high mortalities of S. oryzae and R. dominica are linked with the suppression of offspring production vs. the lower mortalities of T. castaneum and T. granarium, and higher progeny. Probably, the tested insecticidal combination prohibited female individuals of S. oryzae and R. dominica from oviposition before their death through the neurotoxic activity of the pyrethroid and the paralytic action of the anthranilic diamide, leading to a reduction in offspring emergence. Whether the mechanisms of action of the tested insecticides operate independently or are combined when they are simultaneously present in the insects’ organism remains to be investigated. A previous study evaluating thiamethoxam and chlorantraniliprole combinations revealed that after 30 days of storage, S. oryzae progeny was suppressed on wheat, rice, and maize at various combinations of doses, while mortality remained below 85% [54]. The same study showed that 1 mg thiamethoxam/kg plus 0.5 mg chlorantraniliprole/kg and 5 mg thiamethoxam/kg plus 2.5 mg chlorantraniliprole/kg completely prevented the progeny emergence of R. dominica, though mortality did not exceed 74% after the same storage period. For T. castaneum and T. granarium, mortality remained below 64% at the higher doses, but progeny production was reduced to <5 individuals/vial, which is significantly lower compared to >105 in the control groups [54]. The results of Wakil et al. [54] and the current study prove that chlorantraniliprole, in combination with another type of insecticide, is efficient against specific stored-product species, such as S. oryzae and R. dominica. This study also points out that the combined use of chlorantraniliprole with λ-cyhalothrin was not equally effective against all tested species. This is because T. castaneum and T. granarium were tolerant to the combined treatments tested. Obviously, there are barriers that prevent an elevated activity of the examined combination against a broad spectrum of insects. It is well known that several CYP genes (cytochrome P450) in T. castaneum are rapidly upregulated under the pressure of insecticides. This issue is linked with the detoxification of insecticides offering T. castaneum tolerance to numerous compounds. For example, the genes CYP345A1 and CYP4G7 are significantly upregulated by pyrethroids, including λ-cyhalothrin (1.81- and 1.73-fold, respectively) [68]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no relevant data about upregulated genes in T. castaneum due to exposure to chlorantraniliprole. On the other hand, it is thought that combinations of insecticides could make a path to overcome the problem of resistance in stored-product insects [46,69]. However, this hypothesis has been only partially confirmed. For instance, Daglish [69] documented that a combination of the bacterial-based insecticide spinosad (1 mg/kg wheat) and the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos-methyl (10 mg/kg wheat) successfully managed insecticide-resistant strains of T. castaneum, R. dominica, S. oryzae, and Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Laemophloeidae), but not Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). Similarly, another combination of the same insecticides at 0.5 and 2.5 mg a.i./kg wheat, respectively, did not control Liposcelis entomophila (Enderlein) (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae) vs. another three Liposcelis spp., all resistant to various contact insecticides [46]. Therefore, to reinforce the findings of this study, the combination of chlorantraniliprole or λ-cyhalothrin with other types of insecticides needs to be investigated against different stored-product insect species, including strains resistant to insecticides.
The type of the treated commodity played a decisive role in the mortality results of the current study. The higher mortality rates were noted on treated wheat, followed by treated rice and maize. Kavallieratos et al. [50] evaluated chlorantraniliprole-treated maize, artificially peeled rice, barley, whole rice, hard wheat, and oats at different doses against adults of Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae), larvae of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), adults of R. dominica, adults and larvae of T. confusum, and adults of S. oryzae. The results show that the effectiveness of the insecticide varied depending on the commodity, with treated maize leading to the lowest mortality rates of all tested species. The commodity-dependent efficacy of an insecticide is evident in numerous studies [70,71,72,73,74], indicating that the chemical characteristics of each type of grain can influence their effectiveness, as the insecticides show variation in their degradation or dissipation on different types of grains [75]. For instance, Chintzoglou et al. [75] observed accelerated degradation and differences in the rate dissipation of spinosad on maize, compared to barley and wheat, issues that could be linked to the lower mortalities of R. dominica and S. oryzae observed on maize.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole, along with different parameters, such as the type of commodity, is effective against various pests of stored products, even in long-term control, at notably lower doses compared to those that have been used for single application. The combinations of insecticides belonging to different classes could be further evaluated, targeting a considerable reduction in their doses. Additionally, the investigation of different combinations of abiotic parameters, such as temperature or surface of application, could lead to optimal and targeted protection strategies in the storage environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.W. and N.G.K.; methodology, W.W., N.G.K., A.N. and H.J.; software, W.W., N.G.K., A.N. and H.J.; validation, W.W., N.G.K., D.L.S.G. and M.C.B.; formal analysis, W.W., N.G.K., A.N., H.J., D.L.S.G. and M.C.B.; investigation, W.W., N.G.K., A.N., H.J., D.L.S.G. and M.C.B.; resources, W.W. and N.G.K.; data curation, W.W., A.N. and H.J.; writing—original draft preparation, W.W., N.G.K., A.N., H.J., D.L.S.G. and M.C.B.; writing—review and editing, W.W., N.G.K., A.N., H.J., D.L.S.G. and M.C.B.; visualization, W.W., N.G.K., A.N., H.J., D.L.S.G. and M.C.B.; supervision, W.W. and N.G.K.; project administration, W.W.; funding acquisition, W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was partly supported by the Agricultural Linkages Program (CS-097), Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (ALP-PARC), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Phillips, T.W.; Throne, J.E. Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 375–397. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosentrater, K.A. Storage of Cereal Grains and Their Products, 5th ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rees, D. Insects of Stored Products; Manson Publishing: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hagstrum, D.W.; Klejdysz, T.; Subramanyam, B.; Nawrot, J. Atlas of Stored-Product Insects and Mites; AACC International: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Deshwal, R.; Vaibhav, V.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, A.; Singh, R. Stored grain insect pests and their management: An overview. J. Entomol. Zool. 2020, 8, 969–974. [Google Scholar]
  6. Waheed, H.W.; Hassan, M.W.; Sarwar, G.; Jamil, M. Laboratory evaluation of storage bags for infestations in wheat caused by Rhyzopertha dominica F. (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Trogoderma granarium everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) and their control using phosphine fumigation. Insects 2022, 13, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Day, C.; White, B. Khapra Beetle, Trogoderma granarium Interceptions and Eradications in Australia and Around the World; School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia: Crawley, Australia, 2016; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
  8. Edde, P.A. Review of the biology and control of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) the lesser grain borer. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2012, 48, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  9. Su, L.; Adam, B.D.; Arthur, F.H.; Lusk, J.L.; Meullenet, J.F. The economic effects of Rhyzopertha dominica on rice quality: Objective and subjective measures. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 84, 101505. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arthur, F.H.; Ondier, G.O.; Siebenmorgen, T.J. Impact of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) on quality parameters of milled rice. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2012, 48, 137–142. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hagstrum, D.W.; Subramanyam, B. Stored-Product Insect Resource; AACC International: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 2009; p. 509. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jung, J.M.; Byeon, D.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, W.H. Estimating economic damage to cocoa bean production with changes in the spatial distribution of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in response to climate change. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 89, 101681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Akhtar, M.; Raza, A.M.; Iram, N.; Chaudhry, M.I.; Azeem, W. Effect of infestation of Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on protein quality of rice under storage conditions. Int. J. Agric. Appl. Sci. 2015, 7, 43–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Michlig, N.; Amirav, A.; Neumark, B.; Lehotay, S.J. Comparison of different fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry techniques (Cold EI, MS/MS, and HRMS) for the analysis of pyrethroid insecticide residues in food. Anal. Methods 2024, 16, 5599–5618. [Google Scholar]
  15. Al-Sinjari, S.H.; Al-Attar, H.J. Toxic effects of essential oils of Elattaria cardamomum L. and lambda-cyhalothrin on Tribolium confusum (Duval). Sci. J. Univ. Zakho 2015, 3, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yeasmin, A.M.; Waliullah, T.M.; Alam, M.A.; Islam, N.; Rahman, A.S. Co-toxicity evaluation of lambda-cyhalothrin and its synergist pbo for susceptibility of Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). World J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 4, 239–253. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shakoori, F.R.; Feroz, A.; Gondal, A.; Akram, S.; Riaz, T. Impact of λ-cyhalothrin on carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes and macromolecules of a stored grain pest, Trogoderma granarium. Pak. J. Zool. 2018, 50, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, B.; Zhi, H.; Chen, H.; Cui, B.; Zhao, X.; Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; Cui, H.; Zeng, Z. Development of chlorantraniliprole and lambda-cyhalothrin double-loaded nano-microcapsules for synergistical pest control. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abo Arab, R.B.; El-Tawelah, N.M.; Abouelatta, A.M.; Hamza, A.M. Potential of selected plant essential oils in management of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Rhiyzopertha dominica (F.) on wheat grains. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2022, 46, 192. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, M.; Ma, Z.; Hou, J.; Zhang, L.; Li-Byarlay, H.; He, B. The effects of Cl− channel inhibitors and pyrethroid insecticides on calcium-activated chloride channels in neurons of Helicoverpa armigera. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. 2024, 285, 109999. [Google Scholar]
  21. He, L.M.; Troiano, J.; Wang, A.; Goh, K. Environmental chemistry, ecotoxicity, and fate of lambda-cyhalothrin. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 195, 71–91. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rezende-Teixeira, P.; Dusi, R.G.; Jimenez, P.C.; Espindola, L.S.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V. What can we learn from commercial insecticides? Efficacy, toxicity, environmental impacts, and future developments. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 300, 118983. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ren, Y.; Li, Y.; Ju, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y. Insect cuticle and insecticide development. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 114, e22057. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lahm, G.P.; Cordova, D.; Barry, J.D. New and selective ryanodine receptor activators for insect control. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 4127–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, F.; Bai, Q.; Zheng, X.; Lu, Z. Resistance monitoring of Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to chlorantraniliprole in eight field populations from east and central China. Crop Prot. 2017, 100, 196–202. [Google Scholar]
  26. Singh, V.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, S.K. A review on effects of new chemistry insecticides on natural enemies of crop pests. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol. 2016, 5, 4339–4361. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nawaz, M.; Cai, W.; Jing, Z.; Zhou, X.; Mabubu, J.I.; Hua, H. Toxicity and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on the development and fecundity of a non-specific predator, the multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas). Chemosphere 2017, 178, 496–503. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sun, Y.; Liu, S.T.; Ling, Y.; Wang, L.; Ni, H.; Guo, D.; Dong, B.B.; Huang, Q.; Long, L.P.; Zhang, S.; et al. Insecticide resistance monitoring of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its mechanism to chlorantraniliprole. Pest Manag. Sci. 2023, 79, 3290–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dinter, A.; Brugger, K.E.; Frost, N.-M.; Woodward, M.D. Chlorantraniliprole (Rynaxypyr): A novel DuPontTM insecticide with low toxicity and low risk for honey bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) providing excellent tools for uses in integrated pest management. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium of the ICP-Bee Protection Group, Bucharest, Romania, 8–10 October 2008; pp. 84–96. [Google Scholar]
  30. Passos, L.C.; Soares, M.A.; Collares, L.J.; Malagoli, I.; Desneux, N.; Carvalho, G.A. Lethal, sublethal and transgenerational effects of insecticides on Macrolophus basicornis, predator of Tuta absoluta. Entomol. Gen. 2018, 38, 127–143. [Google Scholar]
  31. Soares, M.A.; Passos, L.C.; Campos, M.R.; Collares, L.J.; Desneux, N.; Carvalho, G.A. Side effects of insecticides commonly used against Tuta absoluta on the predator Macrolophus basicornis. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fagundes Matioli, T.; Zanuzo Zanardi, O.; Takao Yamamoto, P. Impacts of seven insecticides on Cotesia flavipes (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Ecotoxicology 2019, 28, 1210–1219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Parsaeyan, E.; Saber, M.; Safavi, S.A.; Poorjavad, N.; Biondi, A. Side effects of chlorantraniliprole, phosalone and spinosad on the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma brassicae. Ecotoxicology 2020, 29, 1052–1061. [Google Scholar]
  34. Abdel razik, M.A.A. Toxicity and side effects of some insecticides applied incotton fields on Apis mellifera. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 4987–4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arthidoro de Castro, M.B.; Martinez, L.C.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Serra, R.S.; Serrão, J.E. Cytotoxic effects on the midgut, hypopharyngeal, glands and brain of Apis mellifera honey bee workers exposed to chronic concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126075. [Google Scholar]
  36. Karpun, N.N.; Yanushevskaya, E.B.; Mikhailova, Y.V.; Díaz-Torrijo, J.; Krutyakov, Y.A.; Gusev, A.A.; Neaman, A. Side effects of traditional pesticides on soil microbial respiration in orchards on the Russian Black Sea coast. Chemosphere 2021, 275, 130040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Attia, M.A.; Wahba, T.F.; Shaarawy, N.; Moustafa, F.I.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Dewer, Y. Stored grain pest prevalence and insecticide resistance in Egyptian populations of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 87, 101611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Riaz, T.; Jalil, F.; Najeeb, A.; Minhas, T.; Shakoori, F.R. Comparative effectiveness of deltamethrin, imidacloprid and emamectin benzoate alone and in binary blends to control Trogoderma granarium: Effect on macronutrients. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2024, 105, 102233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wakil, W.; Schmitt, T. Field trials on the efficacy of Beauveria bassiana, diatomaceous earth and imidacloprid for the protection of wheat grains from four major stored grain insect pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 64, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Scheff, D.S.; Campbell, J.F.; Arthur, F.H.; Zhu, K.Y. Effects of aerosol insecticide application location on the patterns of residual efficacy against Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 2007–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Feroz, A.; Shakoori, A.R.; Shakoori, F.R. Effect of sublethal doses of bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos administered alone and in combinations on esterases of stored grain pest Trogoderma granarium. Pak. J. Zool. 2020, 52, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morrison, W.R., III; Arthur, F.H.; Bruce, A. Characterizing and predicting sublethal shifts in mobility by multiple stored product insects over time to an old and novel contact insecticide in three key stored commodities. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 1990–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yao, J.; Chen, C.; Wu, H.; Chang, J.; Silver, K.; Campbell, J.F.; Arthur, F.H.; Zhu, K.Y. Differential susceptibilities of two closely-related stored product pests, the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) and the confused flour beetle (Tribolium confusum), to five selected insecticides. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 84, 101524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khaliq, A.; Ullah, M.I.; Afzal, M.; Ali, A.; Sajjad, A.; Ahmad, A.; Khalid, S. Management of Tribolium castaneum using synergism between conventional fumigant and plant essential oils. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2020, 40, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cui, K.; Zhang, L.; He, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Mu, W.; Lin, J.; Liu, F. Toxicological effects of the fungal volatile compound 1-octen-3-ol against the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nayak, M.K.; Daglish, G.J. Combined treatments of spinosad and chlorpyrifos-methyl for management of resistant psocid pests (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae) of stored grain. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sutton, A.E.; Arthur, F.H.; Zhu, K.Y.; Campbell, J.F.; Murray, L.W. Residual efficacy of synergized pyrethrin+ methoprene aerosol against larvae of Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bajracharya, N.S.; Opit, G.P.; Talley, J.; Jones, C.L. Efficacies of spinosad and a combination of chlorpyrifos-methyl and deltamethrin against phosphine-resistant Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 2208–2215. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Wakil, W.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Eleftheriadou, N.; Haider, S.A.; Qayyum, M.A.; Tahir, M.; Rasool, K.G.; Husain, M.; Aldawood, A.S. A winning formula: Sustainable control of three stored-product insects through paired combinations of entomopathogenic fungus, diatomaceous earth, and lambda-cyhalothrin. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 15364–15378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Boukouvala, M.C. Insecticidal effect of chlorantraniliprole against major stored-product insect pests in different grain commodities under laboratory tests. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 1141–1154. [Google Scholar]
  51. Plata Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Costa, N.C.R.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Fernandes, M.E.D.S.; Serrão, J.E.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Fernandes, F.L. Chlorantraniliprole–mediated effects on survival, walking abilities, and respiration in the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Magano, D.A.; Carvalho, I.R.; Doberstein, A.P.; Louro, M.V.; Bubans, V.; Drebes, L.; Guedes, J.V.C.; Lautenchleger, F.; Ferreira, L.L.; Boller, W. Efficiency and persistence of insecticides with different action mechanisms applied on wheat stored pest ‘Sitophilus zeamais’. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2021, 15, 618–621. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Boukouvala, M.C.; Eleftheriadou, N.; Xefteri, D.N.; Gidari, D.L.S.; Kyrpislidi, V.P.C. The sublethal impacts of five insecticidal formulations on Oryzaephilus surinamensis behavioral traits. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 5334–5341. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wakil, W.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Eleftheriadou, N.; Sami Ullah, M.; Naeem, A.; Rasool, K.G.; Husain, M.; Aldawood, A.S. Treatment of four stored-grain pests with thiamethoxam plus chlorantraniliprole: Enhanced impact on different types of grain commodities and surfaces. Insects 2023, 14, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Papanikolaou, N.E.; Kazani, A.N.; Boukouvala, M.C.; Malesios, C. Using multilevel models to explore the impact of abiotic and biotic conditions on the efficacy of pirimiphos-methyl against Tenebrio molitor L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 17200–17207. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vásquez-Castro, J.A.; De Baptista, G.C.; Gadanha, C.D.; Trevizan, L.R. Insecticidal effect and residual action of fenitrothion and esfenvalerate on Sitophilus oryzae and S. zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in stored maize and wheat. Int. Sch. Res. Netw. 2012, 2012, 158179. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wakil, W.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Ghazanfar, M.U.; Usman, M. Laboratory and field studies on the combined application of Beauveria bassiana and fipronil against four major stored-product coleopteran insect pests. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 34912–34929. [Google Scholar]
  58. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis; Pearson: Essex, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research; Freeman & Company: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  61. Corbel, V.; Raymond, M.; Chandre, F.; Darriet, F.; Hougard, J.M. Efficacy of insecticide mixtures against larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) resistant to pyrethroids and carbamates. Pest Manag. Sci. 2004, 60, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ahmad, M. Potentiation/antagonism of deltamethrin and cypermethrins with organophosphate insecticides in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2004, 80, 31–42. [Google Scholar]
  63. Attique, M.N.R.; Khaliq A Sayyed, A.H. Could resistance to insecticides in Plutella xylostella (Lep., Plutellidae) be overcome by insecticide mixtures? J. Appl. Entomol. 2006, 130, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahmad, M.; Saleem, M.A.; Sayyed, A.H. Efficacy of insecticide mixtures against pyrethroid and organophosphate resistant populations of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Khan, H.A.A.; Akram, W.; Shad, S.A.; Lee, J.J. Insecticide mixtures could enhance the toxicity of insecticides in a resistant dairy population of Musca domestica L. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 60929. [Google Scholar]
  66. Corbett, J.R. The Biochemical Mode of Action of Pesticides; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  67. Arthur, F.H.; Bautista, R.C.; Siebenmorgen, T.J. Influence of growing location and cultivar on Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infestation of rough rice. Insect Sci. 2007, 14, 231–239. [Google Scholar]
  68. Liang, X.; Xiao, D.; He, Y.; Yao, J.; Zhu, G.; Zhu, K.Y. Insecticide-mediated up-regulation of cytochrome P450 genes in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 2078–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Daglish, G.J. Impact of resistance on the efficacy of binary combinations of spinosad, chlorpyrifos-methyl and s-methoprene against five stored-grain beetles. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008, 44, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khashaveh, A.; Ziaee, M.; Safaralizadeh, M.H.; Lorestani, F.A. Control of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) with spinosad dust formulation in different oilseeds. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2009, 33, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Subramanyam, B.; Hartzer, M.; Boina, D.R. Performance of pre-commercial release formulations of spinosad against five stored-product insect species on four stored commodities. J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 331–339. [Google Scholar]
  72. Andrić, G.; Kljajić, P.; Golić, M.P.; Trdan, S.; Bohinc, T.; Solarov, M.B. Effectiveness of spinosad and spinetoram against three Sitophilus species: Influence of wheat endosperm vitreousness. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 83, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wakil, W.; Schmitt, T.; Kavallieratos, N.G. Performance of diatomaceous earth and imidacloprid as wheat, rice and maize protectants against four stored-grain insect pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2021, 91, 101759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Perišić, V.; Perišić, V.; Rajičić, V.; Luković, K.; Vukajlović, F. Spinosad application in process of integrated pest management against Rhyzopertha dominica F. in stored small grains. In Book of Proceedings: 26. International Eco-Conference, Novi Sad, Serbia, 21–23 Septembar 2022; Novi Sad Ekološki pokret: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2022; pp. 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chintzoglou, G.J.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Markoglou, A.N.; Kavallieratos, N.G. Influence of commodity on the effect of spinosad dust against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2008, 54, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interactions for mortality levels of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults under laboratory trials (total df = 215 for all species).
Table 1. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interactions for mortality levels of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults under laboratory trials (total df = 215 for all species).
Species S. oryzaeT. castaneumT. granariumR. dominica
SourcedfFpFpFpFp
Commodity2156.94<0.01142.63<0.01152.93<0.01150.67<0.01
Exposure interval1732.38<0.01562.90<0.01663.12<0.01833.34<0.01
Dose rate3614.09<0.01522.29<0.01400.75<0.01727.93<0.01
Commodity × exposure interval23.210.045.44<0.013.150.040.030.97
Commodity × dose rate61.400.221.740.110.800.562.320.03
Exposure interval × dose rate31.480.222.070.103.320.020.870.45
Commodity × exposure interval × dose rate69.85<0.010.170.980.700.643.67<0.01
Table 2. Mean mortality (% ± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults exposed for 7 and 14 days on three grain commodities treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole in laboratory trials. For each species within each commodity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each dose rate, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 2, 26, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
Table 2. Mean mortality (% ± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults exposed for 7 and 14 days on three grain commodities treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole in laboratory trials. For each species within each commodity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each dose rate, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 2, 26, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
Exposure Interval (7 Days)
Dose Rate (ppm)
SpeciesCommodity0.010.115Fp
S. oryzaeWheat47.46 ± 0.85 Ad64.75 ± 1.73 Ac78.94 ± 1.13 Ab92.84 ± 1.18 Aa235.2<0.01
Maize39.85 ± 1.30 Bc51.53 ± 2.03 Bb62.19 ± 1.39 Ca67.34 ± 1.26 Ca63.5<0.01
Rice43.88 ± 1.76 ABd56.11 ± 1.96 Bc69.78 ± 2.06 Bb83.53 ± 2.01 Ba76.5<0.01
F7.8312.328.270.5
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. castaneumWheat36.02 ± 1.35 Ad49.34 ± 1.17 Ac65.34 ± 1.65 Ab74.09 ± 1.95 Aa117.6<0.01
Maize25.27 ± 2.38 Bd41.60 ± 1.61 Bc50.51 ± 1.15 Bb59.02 ± 2.03 Ba60.5<0.01
Rice31.26 ± 2.13 ABd46.74 ± 1.10 ABc57.74 ± 1.49 Cb68.38 ± 1.64 Aa94.1<0.01
F7.258.9926.216.3
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. granariumWheat32.82 ± 2.12 Ac42.10 ± 1.71 Ab56.76 ± 2.29 Aa63.04 ± 1.70 Aa48.3<0.01
Maize21.49 ± 1.33 Bc31.38 ± 1.59 Bb42.65 ± 1.25 Ba47.78 ± 1.52 Ba67.2<0.01
Rice27.86 ± 1.83 ABd37.34 ± 1.80 ABc48.91 ± 2.21 Bb59.80 ± 1.88 Aa51.0<0.01
F10.09.8912.822.1
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
R. dominicaWheat41.46 ± 1.26 Ad57.79 ± 1.92 Ac68.69 ± 1.39 Ab86.03 ± 1.93 Aa127.4<0.01
Maize33.21 ± 1.57 Bd45.86 ± 1.93 Bc54.78 ± 1.22 Bb65.77 ± 1.22 Ca82.5<0.01
Rice35.38 ± 2.54 Bd51.18 ± 1.16 Bc62.87 ± 2.03 Ab78.33 ± 1.59 Ba141.9<0.01
F10.212.119.340.2
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
Dose Rate (ppm)
Exposure Interval (14 Days)
SpeciesCommodity0.010.115Fp
S. oryzaeWheat73.29 ± 1.47 Ad81.15 ± 2.08 Ac90.42 ± 1.70 Ab100.00 ± 0.00 Aa56.7<0.01
Maize54.81 ± 1.84 Cd65.51 ± 1.79 Cc82.41 ± 1.17 Bb94.81 ± 1.59 Ba119.1<0.01
Rice61.38 ± 1.77 Bd73.45 ± 1.22 Bc87.58 ± 1.59 ABb100.00 ± 0.00 Aa157.8<0.01
F30.220.37.2510.6
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. castaneumWheat57.71 ± 2.08 Ad66.67 ± 2.18 Ac82.79 ± 1.70 Ab95.89 ± 1.17 Aa85.9<0.01
Maize41.78 ± 1.75 Bd53.42 ± 1.35 Bc65.76 ± 0.93 Bb76.35 ± 1.60 Ca107.5<0.01
Rice46.67 ± 1.58 Bd59.55 ± 1.33 Bc71.63 ± 2.13 Bb83.73 ± 1.96 Ba79.8<0.01
F20.215.727.037.2
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. granariumWheat51.54 ± 1.53 Ad62.56 ± 1.06 Ac73.17 ± 1.55 Ab87.29 ± 1.21 Aa126.9<0.01
Maize37.65 ± 1.86 Bd46.93 ± 1.95 Cc55.11 ± 1.39 Cb69.55 ± 1.27 Ca67.4<0.01
Rice43.49 ± 1.50 Bd54.10 ± 1.34 Bc64.76 ± 1.78 Bb76.36 ± 1.55 Ba82.5<0.01
F18.027.232.543.6
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
R. dominicaWheat63.71 ± 2.09 Ad78.42 ± 1.58 Ac86.96 ± 1.82 Ab100.00 ± 0.00 Aa90.5<0.01
Maize48.12 ± 1.04 Bd61.53 ± 1.70 Bc73.19 ± 1.49 Bb91.09 ± 1.33 Ba166<0.01
Rice52.59 ± 2.37 Bd67.48 ± 2.00 Bc81.32 ± 1.48 Ab100.00 ± 0.00 Aa138<0.01
F17.423.418.544.2
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
Table 3. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interactions for progeny production of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals in laboratory trials (total df = 539 for all species).
Table 3. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interactions for progeny production of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals in laboratory trials (total df = 539 for all species).
SourcedfFp
Species3437.27<0.01
Commodity2119.89<0.01
Dose rate45606.17<0.01
Species × commodity6229.11<0.01
Species × dose rate1270.80<0.01
Commodity × dose rate887.69<0.01
Species × commodity × dose rate2471.98<0.01
Table 4. Mean live numbers (± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals following the exposure of parents to three grain commodities, treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole and untreated control (0 ppm) in laboratory trials. For each species within each commodity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 4, 44, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each dose rate, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 2, 26, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
Table 4. Mean live numbers (± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals following the exposure of parents to three grain commodities, treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole and untreated control (0 ppm) in laboratory trials. For each species within each commodity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 4, 44, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each dose rate, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 2, 26, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
Dose Rate (ppm)
SpeciesCommodity00.010.115Fp
S. oryzaeWheat69.48 ± 1.42 Ca15.23 ± 1.40 Cb12.51 ± 1.33 Cb0.86 ± 0.70 Cc0.78 ± 0.66 Bc608.3<0.01
Maize87.83 ± 1.01 Ba31.21 ± 1.11 Ab26.48 ± 1.42 Ab19.68 ± 1.17 Ac8.51 ± 1.08 Ad694.8<0.01
Rice103.93 ± 1.85 Aa24.81 ± 1.78 Bb19.91 ± 1.50 Bb11.56 ± 1.15 Bc0.80 ± 0.66 Bd792.9<0.01
F13730.524.183.028.9
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. castaneumWheat88.63 ± 0.89 Aa28.03 ± 1.01 Bb23.98 ± 1.43 Bb16.61 ± 1.37 Bc7.65 ± 0.96 Cd763.1<0.01
Maize64.06 ± 1.44 Ba33.66 ± 0.84 Ab29.13 ± 0.88 Abc25.85 ± 1.31 Ac18.16 ± 0.90 Ad254.0<0.01
Rice39.38 ± 1.41 Ca20.05 ± 1.47 Cb17.11 ± 1.46 Cbc15.91 ± 1.20 Bbc12.30 ± 1.36 Bc58.9<0.01
F371.135.621.818.223.1
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. granariumWheat91.76 ± 0.54 Ba34.43 ± 0.80 Cb29.15 ± 0.88 Bc21.10 ± 1.34 Bd13.45 ± 1.31 Be920.7<0.01
Maize104.65 ± 1.83 Aa57.15 ± 1.14 Ab50.96 ± 1.30 Ac41.56 ± 1.50 Ad24.35 ± 1.32 Ae433.4<0.01
Rice73.61 ± 1.29 Ca40.16 ± 1.76 Bb31.20 ± 1.09 Bc25.83 ± 1.31 Bc18.06 ± 1.52 Bd232.2<0.01
F137.482.7118.659.115.5
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
R. dominicaWheat113.98 ± 2.93 Aa22.28 ± 1.36 Bb16.51 ± 1.27 Bbc9.86 ± 0.92 Bc0.68 ± 0.52 Cd806.2<0.01
Maize44.66 ± 1.47 Ca21.81 ± 1.03 Bb19.18 ± 1.11 Bb17.11 ± 0.92 Abc12.65 ± 1.15 Ac117.8<0.01
Rice105.22 ± 2.32 Ba33.65 ± 0.84 Ab24.98 ± 1.54 Ac15.18 ± 1.08 Ad8.50 ± 1.08 Be701.1<0.01
F264.336.910.714.739.6
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
Table 5. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interaction for mortalities of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults after 7 days of exposure in laboratory persistence trials (total df = 143 for all species).
Table 5. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interaction for mortalities of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults after 7 days of exposure in laboratory persistence trials (total df = 143 for all species).
Species S. oryzaeT. castaneumT. granariumR. dominica
SourcedfFpFpFpFp
Dose rate3234.52<0.01212.47<0.01155.41<0.01164.90<0.01
Period of storage31049.14<0.01913.53<0.01763.52<0.01698.05<0.01
Dose rate × period of storage910.20<0.0113.94<0.0115.81<0.018.27<0.01
Table 6. Mean mortality (% ± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults exposed on wheat treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole in four laboratory trials carried out from 0 to 90 days after treatment. For each species within each dose rate, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each period of storage, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
Table 6. Mean mortality (% ± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica adults exposed on wheat treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole in four laboratory trials carried out from 0 to 90 days after treatment. For each species within each dose rate, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each period of storage, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
SpeciesDose (ppm)0 Days30 Days60 Days90 DaysFp
S. oryzae0.0152.74 ± 1.15 Da34.37 ± 0.72 Cb25.21 ± 1.81 Dc7.93 ± 1.68 Cd175.1<0.01
0.174.31 ± 2.35 Ca51.54 ± 1.54 Bb33.55 ± 1.17 Cc12.47 ± 1.37 BCd247.4<0.01
185.65 ± 2.14 Ba57.00 ± 2.08 Bb41.16 ± 1.79 Bc18.05 ± 1.28 Bd234.6<0.01
594.18 ± 0.98 Aa68.71 ± 1.40 Ab47.42 ± 1.19 Ac24.63 ± 1.75 Ad473.2<0.01
F104.288.439.721.9
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. castaneum0.0138.77 ± 1.17 Da26.61 ± 1.46 Db14.71 ± 0.95 Dc0.00 ± 0.00 Cd247.2<0.01
0.156.12 ± 1.55 Ca38.20 ± 1.37 Cb23.27 ± 1.68 Cc5.80 ± 1.60 BCd189.9<0.01
171.42 ± 1.74 Ba45.38 ± 1.82 Bb29.07 ± 1.83 Bc8.54 ± 1.76 ABd219.3<0.01
582.65 ± 1.80 Aa53.59 ± 1.90 Ab37.31 ± 1.01 Ac12.65 ± 1.88 Ad301.2<0.01
F143.847.644.512.2
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. granarium0.0131.97 ± 1.36 Da18.77 ± 1.45 Cb9.21 ± 1.36 Cc0.00 ± 0.00 Bd128.6<0.01
0.157.48 ± 1.22 Ca24.21 ± 1.89 Cb17.38 ± 1.93 Bc0.00 ± 0.00 Bd263.3<0.01
163.94 ± 1.63 Ba35.48 ± 1.60 Bb21.81 ± 2.04 Bc3.41 ± 1.25 ABd236.2<0.01
571.42 ± 1.97 Aa46.75 ± 1.90 Ab30.04 ± 2.24 Ac7.52 ± 2.01 Ad175.0<0.01
F118.151.920.49.07
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
R. dominica0.0145.75 ± 1.91 Da32.51 ± 1.77 Db21.28 ± 1.76 Cc3.77 ± 1.45 Cd105.8<0.01
0.162.13 ± 1.48 Ca43.17 ± 1.62 Cb29.17 ± 2.05 Bc11.74 ± 1.51 Bd161.3<0.01
176.78 ± 1.81 Ba52.37 ± 2.03 Bb35.04 ± 1.62 Bc15.14 ± 1.50 ABd221.0<0.01
587.35 ± 1.96 Aa61.31 ± 2.18 Ab42.94 ± 1.88 Ac18.63 ± 1.71 Ad222.6<0.01
F100.041.324.816.8
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
Table 7. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interactions for progeny production of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals in laboratory persistence trials (total df = 179 for all species).
Table 7. ANOVA parameters of main effects and associated interactions for progeny production of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals in laboratory persistence trials (total df = 179 for all species).
Species S. oryzaeT. castaneumT. granariumR. dominica
SourcedfFpFpFpFp
Dose rate42741.44<0.012143.20<0.012021.50<0.012638.90<0.01
Period of storage3150.40<0.01212.67<0.01209.29<0.01149.27<0.01
Dose rate × period of storage125.43<0.014.57<0.012.62<0.014.75<0.01
Table 8. Mean numbers (± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals per vial following exposure of parents to wheat treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole and untreated control (0 ppm) in four laboratory trials carried out from 0 to 90 days after treatment. For each species within each treatment, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each period of storage, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 4, 44, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
Table 8. Mean numbers (± SE) of S. oryzae, T. castaneum, T. granarium, and R. dominica individuals per vial following exposure of parents to wheat treated with four dose rates of the combination of λ-cyhalothrin and chlorantraniliprole and untreated control (0 ppm) in four laboratory trials carried out from 0 to 90 days after treatment. For each species within each treatment, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; df = 3, 35, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05. For each species within each period of storage, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; df = 4, 44, Tukey (HSD) test at p = 0.05.
SpeciesDose (ppm)0 Days30 Days60 Days90 DaysFp
S. oryzae081.28 ± 1.91 Ab86.51 ± 2.20 Ab93.23 ± 1.32 Aa99.06 ± 0.71 Aa22.4<0.01
0.018.45 ± 1.88 Bc21.88 ± 1.27 Bb27.01 ± 1.65 Bb35.16 ± 1.57 Ba48.3<0.01
0.10.45 ± 0.14 Cd7.06 ± 1.52 Cc15.33 ± 1.36 Cb21.50 ± 1.72 Ca47.4<0.01
10.53 ± 0.18 Cc0.33 ± 0.16 Dc8.26 ± 1.51 Db13.46 ± 1.81 Da28.7<0.01
50.48 ± 0.20 Cb0.38 ± 0.16 Db4.05 ± 1.35 Db9.25 ± 1.51 Da16.5<0.01
F856.7751.3639.9583.4
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. castaneum094.58 ± 2.41 Ac101.07 ± 1.93 Abc106.52 ± 1.85 Aab113.98 ± 1.67 Aa17.1<0.01
0.0113.65 ± 1.45 Bd32.21 ± 1.49 Bc38.73 ± 2.04 Bb45.83 ± 1.35 Ba73.4<0.01
0.15.11 ± 2.16 Cd16.41 ± 1.55 Cc27.90 ± 1.33 Cb36.16 ± 2.40 Ca50.1<0.01
10.25 ± 0.06 Cd9.68 ± 1.50 CDc21.76 ± 1.51 Cb28.41 ± 1.85 Da78.6<0.01
50.40 ± 0.10 Cc3.13 ± 1.87 Dc8.85 ± 1.44 Db17.73 ± 1.56 Ea29.1<0.01
F649.3558.7532.9444.1
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
T. granarium099.35 ± 2.96 Ac107.95 ± 2.34 Ab114.87 ± 1.27 Aab117.43 ± 1.05 Aa15.4<0.01
0.0121.41 ± 1.69 Bc38.16 ± 1.64 Bb46.81 ± 1.66 Ba53.15 ± 1.50 Ba71.5<0.01
0.112.93 ± 1.55 Cc23.88 ± 1.49 Cb35.50 ± 2.54 Ca41.11 ± 1.65 Ca45.3<0.01
16.45 ± 1.53 CDd14.38 ± 1.30 Dc24.21 ± 1.32 Db35.61 ± 2.51 Ca52.3<0.01
50.66 ± 0.52 Dd9.70 ± 1.49 Dc16.15 ± 1.52 Eb23.86 ± 1.49 Da54.5<0.01
F492.2561.7518.9462.5
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
R. dominica097.80 ± 1.95 Ab102.57 ± 2.15 Ab104.87 ± 1.75 Ab115.18 ± 1.75 Aa14.7<0.01
0.0111.93 ± 1.79 Bc29.51 ± 1.31 Bb33.20 ± 2.15 Bb41.61 ± 1.77 Ba48.9<0.01
0.13.13 ± 1.32 Cd12.95 ± 1.56 Cc20.95 ± 1.67 Cb28.48 ± 1.85 Ca45.1<0.01
10.85 ± 0.65 Cc5.18 ± 1.08 Dc12.98 ± 1.57 Db19.81 ± 1.91 Da36.5<0.01
50.88 ± 0.70 Cc0.98 ± 0.64 Dc7.11 ± 1.51 Db13.11 ± 1.61 Da23.5<0.01
F909.7840.2518.4537.9
p<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wakil, W.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Naeem, A.; Jamil, H.; Gidari, D.L.S.; Boukouvala, M.C. Efficacy of the Combination of λ-Cyhalothrin and Chlorantraniliprole Against Four Key Storage Pests. Insects 2025, 16, 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040387

AMA Style

Wakil W, Kavallieratos NG, Naeem A, Jamil H, Gidari DLS, Boukouvala MC. Efficacy of the Combination of λ-Cyhalothrin and Chlorantraniliprole Against Four Key Storage Pests. Insects. 2025; 16(4):387. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wakil, Waqas, Nickolas G. Kavallieratos, Aqsa Naeem, Hamza Jamil, Demeter Lorentha S. Gidari, and Maria C. Boukouvala. 2025. "Efficacy of the Combination of λ-Cyhalothrin and Chlorantraniliprole Against Four Key Storage Pests" Insects 16, no. 4: 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040387

APA Style

Wakil, W., Kavallieratos, N. G., Naeem, A., Jamil, H., Gidari, D. L. S., & Boukouvala, M. C. (2025). Efficacy of the Combination of λ-Cyhalothrin and Chlorantraniliprole Against Four Key Storage Pests. Insects, 16(4), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040387

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop