Next Article in Journal
Evidence of Seasonal Variation in Body Color in Adults of the Parasitoid Cirrospilus pictus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Sicily, Italy
Previous Article in Journal
The Tribe Hyrtanellini Allen, 1980 (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae) of Western and Central Asia with Description of a New Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insect Freeze-Tolerance Downunder: The Microbial Connection

by
Mary Morgan-Richards
1,
Craig J. Marshall
2,
Patrick J. Biggs
3 and
Steven A. Trewick
1,*
1
Wildlife & Ecology Group, School of Natural Sciences, Massey University Manawatu, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand
2
Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
3
Molecular Biosciences, School of Natural Sciences, Massey University Manawatu, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010089
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The alpine insect fauna of Aotearoa/New Zealand is unusual in that many species survive freezing solid at any time of the year. The physiological mechanisms that operate are not well-understood, but we do know the challenges imposed on cells when liquid water expands to form a solid (ice). Insects that are freeze tolerant start freezing at relatively warm temperatures with the help of ice nucleating agents that foster the slow formation of ice crystals outside cells. Here we consider the potential role of microbes living in the guts of alpine Aotearoa/New Zealand insects to facilitate this widespread ability to tolerate freezing. Many bacteria and fungi produce ice-nucleating agents that mediate formation of ice crystals at temperatures just below 0 °C. Some encourage ice formation on foliage with subsequent tissue damage, allowing microbial access to plant nutrients and causing crop damage. Other roles for ice-nucleating agents may include more positive outcomes for insects by facilitating controlled freezing at relatively warm temperatures.

Abstract

Insects that are freeze-tolerant start freezing at high sub-zero temperatures and produce small ice crystals. They do this using ice-nucleating agents that facilitate intercellular ice growth and prevent formation of large crystals where they can damage tissues. In Aotearoa/New Zealand the majority of cold adapted invertebrates studied survive freezing at any time of year, with ice formation beginning in the rich microbiome of the gut. Some freeze-tolerant insects are known to host symbiotic bacteria and/or fungi that produce ice-nucleating agents and we speculate that gut microbes of many New Zealand insects may provide ice-nucleating active compounds that moderate freezing. We consider too the possibility that evolutionary disparate freeze-tolerant insect species share gut microbes that are a source of ice-nucleating agents and so we describe potential transmission pathways of shared gut fauna. Despite more than 30 years of research into the freeze-tolerant mechanisms of Southern Hemisphere insects, the role of exogenous ice-nucleating agents has been neglected. Key traits of three New Zealand freeze-tolerant lineages are considered in light of the supercooling point (temperature of ice crystal formation) of microbial ice-nucleating particles, the initiation site of freezing, and the implications for invertebrate parasites. We outline approaches that could be used to investigate potential sources of ice-nucleating agents in freeze-tolerant insects and the tools employed to study insect microbiomes.

1. Introduction

Within their natural ranges, organisms experience temperatures that fluctuate daily and seasonally with varying degrees of predictability [1]. Life cycles are often strongly tied to the changing seasons as resources and conditions shift. Species living at higher latitudes are exposed to greater temperature variation through their lives than those living close to the equator. Those that are ectotherms, including insects, are generally unable to maintain an optimal internal temperature independent of ambient conditions, so when environmental temperatures fall toward the freezing point of water, insect activity reduces and eventually stops. In temperate regions, insect life cycles are tuned to the seasons with overwintering dormancy typically at a specific developmental stage, such as egg or pupa [2]. Winter dormancy involving diapause is the predominant survival strategy among insect species in temperate and boreal regions of the northern hemisphere. Diapause is a genetically programmed developmental hiatus that cannot be immediately terminated by the return of favourable conditions, so its evolution is linked to environmental cyclicity [3]. For example, Melanoplus sanguinipes grasshoppers in North America overwinter as eggs that enter diapause depending on population-specific environmental conditions [4]. The range of responses to cold is broad in insects [5] but species can be loosely categorized into those that cannot tolerate any ice in their bodies (freeze-intolerant), and those that survive ice (freeze-tolerant). Cold- or freeze-intolerant insects either die when exposed to low temperatures or have mechanisms to prevent ice crystallisation and its damage (freeze avoidance).
Many insects couple diapause with freeze-avoidance mechanisms in their lifecycle by producing ‘anti-freeze’ proteins to defer mortality as winter approaches. These proteins, such as the β-helical protein of spruce budworm larvae [6], suppress the temperature at which water in and around their cells forms ice crystals. Others have evolved a different strategy that allows freeze-tolerance; the ability to survive freezing. Among pterygote insects that have been studied, most species (>70%) that are able to survive cold temperatures do so by freeze avoidance [7]. Many of the well-studied species are in high-latitude landscapes of the northern hemisphere, where they are exposed to extreme but predominantly seasonal temperature change [8,9]. In Aotearoa/New Zealand, however, where a relatively mild maritime temperate climate appears to result in relaxed diapause [9], the prevalent (85%) strategy among endemic mountain invertebrates is to freeze solid when temperatures dip below 0 °C [10]. In the Southern Alps of New Zealand, sub-zero temperatures can occur at any time of year, so these insects freeze at any time of the year and growth stage then reanimate as their environment warms [10].
Water is an amazing molecule that forms the matrix of life on Earth [11] having unusual and biologically significant molecular properties [12]. As a liquid, it contains a multitude of hydrogen bonds between O and H atoms of adjacent molecules that are in rapid flux. The density of liquid H2O varies with temperature; it is maximal as a liquid at about 4 °C and declines when either heated or cooled. Critically, water undergoes negative thermal expansion when it freezes because the open and ordered hexagonal crystalline structure of ice is less dense (occupying ~9% more volume) than liquid water, and so floats (Figure 1) [13].
In ambient conditions, the highest temperature at which water can freeze is 0 °C, but at this temperature pure water is unlikely to undergo the phase change to a crystalline form that we usually consider to be ‘freezing’. The minimum temperature at which ice can form is suppressed by the presence of certain solutes (resulting in freezing point depression). This is why salt is used to deice roads in winter. However, even when cooled below the influence of solutes, water is only metastable and can remain liquid down to about –40 °C, at which point homogeneous nucleation occurs [15].
Heterogeneous nucleation caused by ice-nucleating agents is common in biological systems and can occur at temperatures just a few degrees below the freezing point depression (Figure 2A). When cooled, the aqueous solution in an insect body is in a metastable supercooled state where rapid ice growth occurs following nucleation. The degree of supercooling influences the properties of the ice crystals that form with low temperature nucleation, tending to result in small ice crystals that can penetrate tissues via gap junctions [16]. Thus, rapid freezing at low temperatures results in intracellular freezing that is more likely to cause damage [17,18]. By reducing the amount of supercooling, and thus the speed of subsequent crystal growth, heterogenous ice-nucleation in an insect can limit damage to insect tissues and render them freeze-tolerant.
The temperature at which the cooled bodily fluids freeze is the temperature of crystallization (TC) or nucleation temperature, and approximates to the supercooling point, although TC is usually slightly lower. TC can be measured because the phase change releases heat due to the exothermic nature of the process, and this can be detected as latent heat (Figure 2B). The temperature of crystallization of water inside terrestrial arthropods can be anywhere from −2 °C to −100 °C [19,20].
Figure 2. (A) The temperature of water crystallization is suppressed (freezing point depression) by increasing concentration of solutes such as sugars and salts (blue symbols). However, addition of haemolymph from Eleodes blanchardi beetles (orange symbols) [21,22] elevates this by about 10 °C. (B) The release of energy (exotherm) that occurs when water changes from the liquid to solid state (freezing) marks the temperature of crystallization (TC) or ‘supercooling point’. Detection of this exotherm in an experimental setting shows that ice has formed in the subject. In this example the caterpillar of the alpine tiger moth (Metacrias huttoni) has a higher (warmer) temperature of crystallization than its internal tachinid parasite, Pales sp. [23].
Figure 2. (A) The temperature of water crystallization is suppressed (freezing point depression) by increasing concentration of solutes such as sugars and salts (blue symbols). However, addition of haemolymph from Eleodes blanchardi beetles (orange symbols) [21,22] elevates this by about 10 °C. (B) The release of energy (exotherm) that occurs when water changes from the liquid to solid state (freezing) marks the temperature of crystallization (TC) or ‘supercooling point’. Detection of this exotherm in an experimental setting shows that ice has formed in the subject. In this example the caterpillar of the alpine tiger moth (Metacrias huttoni) has a higher (warmer) temperature of crystallization than its internal tachinid parasite, Pales sp. [23].
Insects 14 00089 g002
Elevation of the temperature of crystallisation can be detected in haemolymph extracted from insects (Figure 2), but the origin of the ice-nucleating (ice+) agents is unclear. Ice formation in freeze-tolerant insects is typically initiated by ice+ in the lumen of the gut and therefore outside of gut cells, and this facilitates slow ice growth after minimal supercooling [24]. Water is drawn out of cells, increasing the concentration of cryoprotective solutes by the freeze-concentration effect (Figure 2A), and lowering the freezing temperature within cells, thereby avoiding lethal intracellular freezing [19,25,26].

2. Ice-Nucleating Agents (Ice+)

The best agent of ice nucleation is another ice crystal, and some freeze-tolerant insects such as the North American woolly bear caterpillar (Pyrrharctia isabella), and linden bug (Pyrrhocoris apterus) undergo passive ice inoculation from outside their bodies [27,28]. In suitable circumstances this can result in survivable freezing above −3 °C. In many other cases biological particles and macromolecules act as very efficient ice nuclei (ice+), triggering ice formation at temperatures just below 0 °C. For example, snow makers on ski fields use ice+ particles harvested from bacteria (e.g., the rod-shaped, gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas syringae in Snowmax®) to initiate crystallization of water [29].
Multicellular animals that can survive freezing, control ice formation in their bodies (usually extracellular water) using ice-nucleating (ice+) agents that arrange water molecules into stable embryo crystals at high sub-zero temperatures (−5 to −2 °C [30]) and limit supercooling [31]. At these relatively warm temperatures ice grows slowly, and the resulting large crystals limit stress to living tissue from solute freeze-concentration, and ice remains outside cells.
Ice recrystallization-inhibiting proteins are also found in some freeze-tolerant animals including some nematodes [32]. These proteins are thought to be involved in controlling the shape, formation, and stability of ice crystals after freezing (below 0 °C), by inhibiting recrystallization. At moderate sub-zero temperatures, a layer of liquid water sits between ice crystals, and larger crystals tend to grow at the expense of the smaller ones. Recrystallisation-inhibiting proteins limit this growth and thus limit damage to tissues.

3. Sources of Ice+ Particles

Ice-nucleating agents used by insects have many sources (Figure 3). Some freeze-tolerant arthropods produce specific endogenous protein ice-nucleators, and in other species selection has produced dual function protein ice-nucleators [19,33]. Ice+ particles produced directly by insects are usually large, heat-sensitive proteins [19,34]. Insects freezing with a temperature of crystallization (Tc) below −6 °C, as recorded by detection of an exotherm (See Figure 2), are likely to be producing their own (endogenous) ice+ [19,35]. Instead of manufacturing their own, some animals use exogenous ice+ particles for controlled freezing. Insects with a Tc between −6 and −3 °C might be using exogenous ice+ particles derived from the environment [36] (Figure 2B). However, more common sources of ice+ agents seem to be derived from bacteria and fungi (Figure 3) and some species of insect rely on commensal ice+ microbes for particles that facilitate high-temperature freezing [37,38].
It is increasingly apparent that ice+ microbes are environmentally common and widely influential, seeding ice crystal formation inside animals, on the surface of leaves [39] and in clouds [40]. Many cosmopolitan microbes have strains that produce ice+ proteins, and many of these ice+ lineages are plant pathogens that are abundant on leaf surfaces [39]. When temperatures drop at night, frost forms on the leaf stimulated by the ice+ proteins, and frost damaged leaves then become a resource for ice+ bacteria such as Erwinia herbicola and ice+ fungi such as Fusarium sp.
The bacterium Pseudomonas syringae produces large heat-sensitive ice+ particles on their cell membranes where the distance between particles dictates ice+ efficiency [41]. In contrast, other bacteria produce small ice+ particles and these still function as ice nucleators after heating (e.g., Lysinibacillus [40]). In some cases, sub-micron heat-sensitive ice+ particles (e.g., Mortierella alpina [42]) remain active long after the source dies (e.g., Fusarium avenaceum [43]) creating an environmental source of ice+ particles (Figure 3).
Many of the bacteria and fungi acting as ice+ agents are apparently found all over the world in many different habitats, but are they really the same? For example, the cosmopolitan fungus Fusarium is found in soils, and in water, on plants, and in clouds. When more than 100 strains of this fungus were studied to characterise their ability to catalyse ice formation, only ~16% of strains caused water crystallisation above −12 °C [44]. Strains that do not have the ability to act as ice-nuclei and raise the temperature of crystallisation are referred to as ice strains. The macromolecules (<100 kDa) produced by Fusarium are ice+ active and stable after the fungus has died, but they are heat sensitive and lose ice+ activity after reaching 40 °C. The bacterium Pseudomonas syringae is also ubiquitous [39] but includes both ice+ and ice strains [45].
Figure 3. Insects that are freeze tolerant usually have relatively high temperatures of intercellular water crystallization facilitated by ice-nucleating agents (ICE+). There are many possible sources of ice+ agents in the environment and within the insect, of different sizes, stability, and efficiency. For example: (A) manufactured by the insect, e.g., lipoproteins in Tipula trivittata [46], (B) derived from microbes, e.g., large proteins from Pseudomonas borealis [47], (C) created by plants, e.g., class II chitinase [48], (D) environmental particles, e.g., kaolin-iron oxide composites [49], and (E) manufactured by fungi, e.g., fungal hydrophobins [50].
Figure 3. Insects that are freeze tolerant usually have relatively high temperatures of intercellular water crystallization facilitated by ice-nucleating agents (ICE+). There are many possible sources of ice+ agents in the environment and within the insect, of different sizes, stability, and efficiency. For example: (A) manufactured by the insect, e.g., lipoproteins in Tipula trivittata [46], (B) derived from microbes, e.g., large proteins from Pseudomonas borealis [47], (C) created by plants, e.g., class II chitinase [48], (D) environmental particles, e.g., kaolin-iron oxide composites [49], and (E) manufactured by fungi, e.g., fungal hydrophobins [50].
Insects 14 00089 g003

4. Extended Genotype

The concept of the extended phenotype [51] considers the broadest influence of genes beyond their source organisms and it is recognised that the genetics of microbiomes considerably extends the evolutionary potential of their hosts [52]. The microbiome of an insect can complement its phenotypic scope in many ways. For example, insect microbiomes increase the range of food sources and growth rates of their hosts by improving the digestion of food, such as breaking down cellulose and increasing the absorption of nutrients. Recent studies are revealing this role in unexpected ways. In the digestive tract of the darkling beetle (Zophobas morio) larvae, live Bacillus bacteria that can decompose polystyrene, and free nutrients to the insect [53]. However, the influence of gut microbes on their host reaches beyond fundamental nutritional processes. Gut microbes are also involved in fat storage, production of essential amino acids, protection against pathogens with antimicrobial activity, and enhance the host’s immune response [54]. Some insects rely on cues from microbes for the initiation of metamorphosis from larvae to adult [55] and a gut bacterium is implicated in the manufacture of a pheromone that mediates cohesion of the gregarious phase of the locust Schistocerca gregaria [56]. The contribution of gut microbes to cold adaptation is now being recognized in a range of animal hosts [57]. For example, brown bears benefit from their gut microbes during hibernation, and mice inoculated with bear microbes gain a similar metabolic phenotype [58]. In insects, freezing is typically initiated in the gut [24,30,59], and ice+ activity is greater in the gut contents of many insects than in their haemolymph [60,61] (Figure 3). Thus, the gut and its microbiome may be the key to understanding freeze-tolerance in a range of invertebrates (Figure 3).
Insects can shape their gut microbiota by ingesting food containing beneficial microbes or ice+ agents in food species [62]. For example, two freeze-tolerant beetles (Hydromedion sparsutum and Perimylops antarcticus) collected from the same sub-Antarctic island were both host to gut Pseudomonas sp. with ice+ activity [63]. Experimental work has demonstrated that insects fed ice-active bacteria froze at higher temperatures than pre-feeding. Normally Hippodamia ladybird beetles freeze at −16 °C but after experimental feeding with ice+ bacteria they froze at just −3.5 °C [35] (Figure 4). This results in their death as the beetles are not freeze-tolerant. This experimental system might be used for biological control to reduce the abundance of pest insects, but frost damage to crops at relatively high temperatures is a possible unwanted side effect of applying ice+ bacteria to plant leaves. In contrast, freeze-tolerant beetle and moth species play host to specific ice+ microbes that facilitate controlled high-temperature freezing allowing these insects to survive cold conditions [37,63,64].

5. Transmission of Insect Microbes

Microbes inhabiting insect guts are either inherited from parents or acquired from the environment. Many insect species have symbiotic relationships with bacteria in their gut, body cavity, or within cells of various tissues (Gupta and Nair 2020) [66], and to ensure that offspring are inoculated with these specialist microbial partners a range of mechanisms for vertical transmission (mother to offspring) of symbionts have evolved. Endocellular symbiotic bacteria that are essential for survival and reproduction of their host insect have stable maternal inheritance that has resulted in host–symbiont cospeciation (e.g., Buchnera of aphids and Wigglesworthia tsetse flies [67,68]). In several well-studied hemipteran systems (e.g., leafhoppers and aphids) specialist bacteria are distributed widely within the insect host. By colonizing organs such as the gut and male and female gonads they achieve vertical transmission and transmission between sexes during mating [66]. Fusarium fungus associated with sugarcane infects foraging caterpillars [69] and is subsequently transmitted in the eggs from mother to offspring. This pathogenic fungus manipulates both plant and insect to promote its infection and dissemination.
Bacteria that colonise only the insect gut can nevertheless be transmitted vertically in a number of ways [66] including egg smearing and coprophagy [70]. Plataspid stinkbugs use a symbiont capsule encasing their beneficial bacteria, this is deposited when the female lays her eggs. The newly hatched nymphs eat the capsule and their guts are colonized by their mother’s symbiotic bacteria [67,71]. In a similar manner, some grasshoppers obtain gut bacteria from their mothers who inoculate the foam covering their eggs with bacteria that their nymphs will ingest when hatching [72]. Cockroaches transmit obligate endosymbiont Blattabacterium bacteria via frass [73]. It is also possible for early instar insect nymphs to acquire symbionts directly from the surrounding environment, as seen in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris, which does not transmit its Burkholderia symbiont vertically from mother to offspring [68]. Thus, transmission of specific microbes in insects is feasible, and it is also possible that through the selection of foods containing desirable bacteria, mobile insects can shape their own gut microbiota and ice+ agents [62]. There is even potential for horizontal exchange of microbes between unrelated hosts and this could confer adaptive phenotypes resembling convergent evolution.

6. Freeze-Tolerant Insects in Aotearoa/New Zealand

In the New Zealand alpine zone, a profusion of separate endemic insect lineages [74,75] can survive freezing, including cockroaches [76] (Figure 5a), wētā [77] (Figure 5b), grasshoppers [78] (Figure 5c), moths [23,79], and stick insects [80]. In these mountains temperatures can drop to freezing levels even in the summer, which is likely why these insects are freeze-tolerant throughout the year [10]. However, despite the frequent episodes of cold in all seasons, temperatures on New Zealand mountains rarely fall far below −10 °C. This may be important for the evolution of freeze-tolerance as the structure and growth of ice crystals continues to change as temperatures drop, putting greater stress on cellular organisms. Here we summarise some key features of three alpine insect species that are freeze-tolerant and are better understood in terms of their biology and freezing ability than other New Zealand alpine insects. For all three species that can be found at the same high-elevation sites in the Southern Alps details have been recorded of their internal temperature of ice crystal formation, the initiation site of freezing, their parasites, and their microbiome.
Figure 5. Three freeze-tolerant endemic Aotearoa-New Zealand insect species and their phylogenetic relatives. (A) The Otago alpine cockroach (Celatoblatta quinquemaculata) is a nocturnal omnivore. Alpine lineages are not monophyletic within New Zealand Celatoblatta (denoted with blue star on tree). (B) The mountain tree wētā (Hemideina maori) is a nocturnal omnivore. Alpine lineages are not monophyletic within the wētā clade. (C) The southern alpine grasshopper (Sigaus australis) is a diurnal herbivore within a cold-adapted endemic lineage. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed from (A) unpublished mtDNA genome sequences, (B) 755 transcriptomes [81], and (C) whole mtDNA genome sequences [82].
Figure 5. Three freeze-tolerant endemic Aotearoa-New Zealand insect species and their phylogenetic relatives. (A) The Otago alpine cockroach (Celatoblatta quinquemaculata) is a nocturnal omnivore. Alpine lineages are not monophyletic within New Zealand Celatoblatta (denoted with blue star on tree). (B) The mountain tree wētā (Hemideina maori) is a nocturnal omnivore. Alpine lineages are not monophyletic within the wētā clade. (C) The southern alpine grasshopper (Sigaus australis) is a diurnal herbivore within a cold-adapted endemic lineage. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed from (A) unpublished mtDNA genome sequences, (B) 755 transcriptomes [81], and (C) whole mtDNA genome sequences [82].
Insects 14 00089 g005

6.1. Celatoblatta quinquemaculata—The Otago Alpine Cockroach

This small alpine cockroach of Otago, New Zealand (maximum mass about 130 mg) (Figure 5A) lives among rocks and vegetation above ~800 m above sea level, where they are exposed to highly variable temperatures that even in summer can drop below freezing [83]. It is active all year and can survive freezing at any time of the year [76,83,84,85]. The genus Celatoblatta comprises a radiation of more than a dozen species endemic to New Zealand [86], and several of these live at a range of elevations. Some are restricted to cold environments; however, alpine adaptation does not appear to unite a monophyletic group of species (Figure 5).
Celatoblatta quinquemaculata freeze at the relatively high temperature of −5.4 °C and have a lower lethal temperature of −8.9 °C [84] (Table 1). Although concentration of the cryoprotective agent trehalose fluctuates seasonally within these insects [59], the seasonal difference between the highest and lowest mean temperature of crystallization was only 1.8 °C [84]. The temperature at which C. quinquemaculata freeze (temperature of crystallization) is the same as the temperature at which some bacterial ice+ agents ensure ice formation occurs. Although ice+ agents have been found in insect haemolymph, C. quinquemaculata ice+ activity is strongest in the frass, gut contents, and gut [24,60]. Two-thirds of C. quinquemaculata specimens examined had the nematode Blatticola barryi in their gut [87], which is also freeze-tolerant. Microbial communities are known to be diverse in omnivorous cockroaches (Schauer et al., 2012) [88], and our preliminary DNA sequencing of gut contents from two C. quinquemaculata is no exception. In the DNA samples we detected high proportions of the expected obligate mutualistic endosymbionts from the family Blattabacteriaceae [89] (Figure 6).
Ice formation in this cockroach is thought to be intercellular, but gut cells of this species are unusual in their ability to survive intracellular freezing [18,59,90,91]. Because the gut is a closed system, the avenues available for ice to reach the haemolymph are limited, but a possible pathway is through the cells forming the wall of the gut. When freezing, 74% of an alpine cockroach’s body water is converted into ice [76]. Both thermal-hysteresis (the lagging of freezing) and ice recrystallisation-inhibition activities are absent from the haemolymph of C. quinquemaculata, although both types of chemical activity occur in its gut tissue [59]. Preliminary analysis of whole cockroach ice shell extracts showed evidence for three groups of ice-binding proteins; two small (8.4 kDa and 9.3 kDa) and one larger (>50 kDa; unpublished data).

6.2. Hemideina maori—The Mountain Tree Wētā

The southern hemisphere crickets known as wētā include the world’s largest freeze-tolerant insects—Hemideina maori and the alpine scree wētā Deinacrida connectens [61,77,92,93,94]. The phylogenetic relationships within the New Zealand tree and giant wētā reveal that cold adaptation is not restricted to a single clade (Figure 5B) and could plausibly be considered a shared ancestral state with some species having lost freeze-tolerance [61,93,95]. The mountain tree wētā has a wide distribution on the Southern Alps above the treeline (>1100 m asl) and some forest-free inland locations. This nocturnal alpine omnivore uses cavities beneath stones and crevices in rock outcrops to shelter during the day. It is freeze-tolerant throughout the year and ice-nucleation activity is found in the gut throughout the year (Figure 5B). It has a temperature of crystallization of −3.8 °C [24,77] and ice formation begins in the hindgut and may then propagate through the gut cells, eventually nucleating the haemolymph (Table 1). Some osmotic dehydration must occur ahead of the approaching ice front, but not enough to prevent freezing [24]. It was found that the maximum proportion of body water of an individual that can freeze (82%) was converted to ice when H. maori was held at −5 °C, with the freezing event taking approximately ten hours to complete [92]. Ice-nucleation activity is highest in the gut and frass of H. maori but is also evident in the haemolymph. The nucleation activity of the haemolymph is lost by heating or passage through a fine filter, suggesting that the nucleator is a large protein [85].
Some freeze-avoiding insects such as beetles and aphids have freeze-avoiding parasites that influence the temperature of crystallization of their hosts [96,97]. Individual H. maori wētā are typically parasitized by about 50 Wetanema sp. nematodes living in their hind gut [98]. Wetanema can survive freezing within its host but as it tolerates much lower temperatures than H. maori [98] it is unlikely that Wetanema provide the wētā host with ice+ particles. No significant difference was found between the temperature of crystallization of H. maori individuals with and without nematodes and there was no correlation between the number of nematodes and the temperature of crystallization of the host. The temperature of crystallization of the host and parasite differ in some insects such as caterpillars of the New Zealand eastern tiger moth, Metacrias huttoni, which reaches exotherm at −3.3 °C, well ahead of its internal tachinid fly parasite (Pales tecta) that freezes at −4.2 °C (Figure 2B) [23].

6.3. Sigaus australis—The Southern Alpine Grasshopper

The alpine grasshoppers of New Zealand can also survive freezing at any time of the year (Pers. Obs.) [78]. Although the twelve species of cold-adapted grasshoppers are monophyletic (Figure 5C), their common ancestor existed before the development of the New Zealand alpine environment (Figure 5) and so alpine adaptations in species of this clade appear to be the result of convergent evolution [82]. Convergent evolution could result from novel solutions to the same stress (e.g., as seen in New Zealand stick insects [80]). About a third of these grasshoppers have gregarine protozoans in their guts [99] which must also tolerate freeze thawing. In the lab, adult Sigaus australis have a temperature of crystallization recorded between −0.1 and −4.8 °C [100], suggesting the involvement of exogenous ice+ agents, with the medium temperature at which all available body water froze between −1 and −3 °C [78]. The lower lethal temperature for this grasshopper is −11 °C [5]. New Zealand Chionochloa tussock grasses produce ice+ proteins that initiate freezing between −5.2 and −6 °C [36] and potential plant ice+ protein genes have been identified for C. macra (e.g., IRI2 and EAF2) [101] providing a valuable resource for the study of potential plant-derived ice+ agents. However, New Zealand alpine grasshoppers appear to eat little grass [102], and as the ice+ proteins of Chionochloa tussock grasses initiate freezing at a lower temperature than the grasshopper freezes, this is probably not a source of ice+ for S. australis.

7. Exploring the Microbiome

Each endemic New Zealand insect lineage may have independently evolved production of unique endogenous ice+ agents to control and tolerate freezing (Table 1), but freezing starts at temperatures above −6 °C in the gut, where high concentrations of ice+ particles occur. Is it plausible then, that a common environmental source of ice+ enables so many New Zealand insects to be freeze-tolerant?
Metagenomic DNA sequence data from the hindgut of the sympatric New Zealand alpine cockroach, wētā, and grasshopper have provided intriguing results. All three species are home to microbes with ice+ potential, including Pseudomonas syringae, P. fluorescens, Mortierella spp., and Fusarium spp. [103]. Any combination of these taxa could contribute to freeze-tolerance of the insect hosts. High-throughput sequencing of DNA extracted from the guts of two individuals of each insect species revealed complex microbial communities with significant differences in microbiome composition among host taxa but less variation among conspecific individuals (Figure 6a). Within the cockroach gut we detected abundant sequences from obligate mutualistic Blattabacterium that are known endosymbionts of this insect order. Within the wētā there was a high diversity of bacteria, including an abundance of Firmicutes as recorded in the congeneric Hemideina thoracica [104]. Despite the grasshopper and wētā being more closely related (both Orthoptera), the microbiome of the wētā and sympatric cockroach appear the more similar of the three host species. The grasshopper hindguts were relatively rich in viruses and eukaryotes (fungi, metamonads, and amoebozoans) compared to the wētā gut samples that were dominated by uncultured bacteria (Figure 6b).
Figure 6. Gut microbiome of six New Zealand freeze-tolerant insects inferred from shotgun DNA sequencing. Heatmaps generated using MEGAN v6.24.1 [105] and visualised as a Z-score for the two samples from cockroaches (Celatoblatta quinquemaculata), wētā (Hemideina maori), and grasshoppers (Sigaus australis) from Central Otago. Data are clustered by sample composition similarity (above) and proportions of the data (right) showing all assigned nodes. The six samples were analysed using the Kaiju webserver (using the nr-euk 2021_03 database), downloaded and processed with a custom Perl script. Results are (A) visualised at the taxonomic level of kingdom with only data above a normalised cut-off of 1 read per million sequences shown, and (B) visualised at the taxonomic level of family with only data above a normalised cut-off of 100 reads per million sequences shown.
Figure 6. Gut microbiome of six New Zealand freeze-tolerant insects inferred from shotgun DNA sequencing. Heatmaps generated using MEGAN v6.24.1 [105] and visualised as a Z-score for the two samples from cockroaches (Celatoblatta quinquemaculata), wētā (Hemideina maori), and grasshoppers (Sigaus australis) from Central Otago. Data are clustered by sample composition similarity (above) and proportions of the data (right) showing all assigned nodes. The six samples were analysed using the Kaiju webserver (using the nr-euk 2021_03 database), downloaded and processed with a custom Perl script. Results are (A) visualised at the taxonomic level of kingdom with only data above a normalised cut-off of 1 read per million sequences shown, and (B) visualised at the taxonomic level of family with only data above a normalised cut-off of 100 reads per million sequences shown.
Insects 14 00089 g006
If ice+ agents are of microbial origin as suggested by their high concentration in the gut and signal from preliminary DNA metagenomics (Figure 6), then there is the potential for different insect lineages to contain identical ice+ agents. One approach to exploring this would be to isolate ice-binding proteins using the ‘ice shell’ technique [106] and characterise them by mass spectrometry. Determination of amino acid sequences from digested protein fragments allows the linkage of proteins with their respective genes via databases such as Pfam/InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ accessed on 3 November 2022). Motif matching can identify candidate ice-binding regions in novel sequences; however, with non-model organisms such as these insects there may be few homologues in existing databases and so matching against transcriptomes derived from each group of animals is likely to be important for protein characterisation.
RNA extracted and sequenced from gut contents can be used to assemble the meta-transcriptomes of host microbiomes. This allows the study of gene expression across a whole complex of microbial communities within their natural environment. Genes with specific roles can be identified [107], and the symbiotic role of the gut microbiota in insects explored [108]. As specific ice+ agents may constitute a relatively small proportion of expressed genes in each sample, enrichment for messenger RNA is an important step. For microbial studies subtractive, hybridization is generally used for depletion of ribosomal RNA, but use of biotinylated oligonucleotides specific to 5S, 16S, and 28S rRNA is an emerging option [109]. Insect transcriptomes can be subtracted from the microbial RNA and the open-reading frames from mRNA sequences interrogated for the distinctive motifs of candidate ice+ proteins. Both functional and compositional convergence of the microbiomes of different hosts is possible. Functional information can be extracted by profiling presence/absence and abundance of microbial pathways in a community, and gene ontology analysis will reduce complexity and highlight biological processes. The functional Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes orthology (KEGG) database provides opportunities for studying functional convergence [110].
Meta-transcriptomics is used primarily for functional analysis of genes expressed in the gut microbiome but can also be used for comparing the taxonomic composition of the microbial community. Despite depletion, rRNA sequences are very abundant in all organisms and likely to be represented among data, and these suit taxonomic analyses of community composition [111,112].
Differential gene expression experiments comparing mRNA extracted from a range of tissue samples before and during freezing is a powerful tool for identifying ice+ agents. By mapping reads from each tissue sample before and after freezing to assembled transcriptomes [113], (after unique gene identification and normalizing read count) one can identify differential gene expression [80] and find out what microbes are actively transcribing at low temperatures. In this way it will be possible to identify the genes and organisms involved in freeze-tolerant phenotypes exhibited by a large array of New Zealand insects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.-R. and S.A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.-R. and S.A.T.; writing—review and editing, M.M.-R., S.A.T., C.J.M. and P.J.B.; visualization, S.A.T.; funding acquisition, M.M.-R. and C.J.M.; formal analysis, P.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Massey University, RM22191; RM22902; RM23764.

Data Availability Statement

The new data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available as analyses have yet to be completed.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Michelle Gdanitz, Naomi Laven, and members of the Te Taha Tawhiti/Phoenix group (http://evolves.massey.ac.nz/ accessed on 3 November 2022). Original photograph of Metacrias huttoni caterpillar by Carey Knox https://inaturalist.nz/observations/142315195 (accessed on 3 November 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lisovski, S.; Ramenofsky, M.; Wingfield, J.C. Defining the degree of seasonality and its significance for future research. Integ. Comp. Biol. 2017, 57, 934–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Denlinger, D.L. Regulation of diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 93–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tougeron, K. Diapause research in insects: Historical review and recent work perspectives. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2019, 167, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fielding, D.J. Diapause traits of Melanoplus sanguinipes and Melanoplus borealis (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2008, 101, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sinclair, B.J. Insect cold tolerance: How many kinds of frozen? Eur. J. Entomol. 1999, 96, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  6. Graether, S.; Kuiper, M.; Gagné, S.M.; Walker, V.K.; Jia, Z.; Sykes, B.D.; Davies, P.L. β-Helix structure and ice-binding properties of a hyperactive antifreeze protein from an insect. Nature 2000, 406, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Toxopeus, J.; Sinclair, B.J. Mechanisms underlying insect freeze tolerance. Biol. Rev. 2018, 93, 1891–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Poikela, N.; Tyukmaeva, V.; Hoikkala, A.; Kankare, M. Multiple paths to cold tolerance: The role of environmental cues, morphological traits and the circadian clock gene vrille. BMC Ecol. Evol. 2021, 21, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roberts, R.M. Seasonal strategies in insects. N. Z. Entomol. 1978, 6, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sinclair, B.J.; Addo-Bediako, A.; Chown, S.L. Climatic variability and the evolution of insect freeze tolerance. Biol. Rev. 2003, 78, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franks, F. Water: A Matrix of Life, 2nd ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lock, G.S.H. The Growth and Decay of Ice; Cambridge University Press Inc.: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lide, D.R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; ISBN 9780849304842. [Google Scholar]
  14. Heverly, J.R. Supercooling and crystallization. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1949, 30, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lundheim, R. Physiological and ecological significance of biological ice nucleators. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 357, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Mazur, P. A biologist’s view of the relevance of thermodynamics and physical chemistry to cryobiology. Cryobiology 2010, 60, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Salt, R.W. A comparison of injury and survival of larvae of Cephus cinctus Nort. after intracellular and extracellular freezing. Can. J. Zool. 1961, 39, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Worland, M.R.; Wharton, D.A.; Byars, S.G. Intracellular freezing and survival in the freeze tolerant alpine cockroach C. quinquemaculata. J. Insect Physiol. 2004, 50, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duman, J.G.; Walters, K.R.; Sformo, T.; Carrasco, M.A.; Nickell, P.K.; Lin, X.; Barns, B.M. Antifreeze and ice-nucleator proteins. In Low Temperature Biology of Insects; Denlinger, D.L., Lee, R.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 59–90. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sformo, T.; Walters, K.; Jeannet, K.; Wowk, B.; Fahy, G.M.; Barnes, B.M.; Duman, J.G. Deep supercooling, vitrification and limited survival to −100 °C in the Alaskan beetle Cucujus clavipes puniceus (Coleoptera: Cucujidae) larvae. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zachariassen, K.; Hammel, H. Nucleating agents in the haemolymph of insects tolerant to freezing. Nature 1976, 262, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, R.E.; Zachariassen, K.E.; Baust, J.G. Effect of cryoprotectants on the activity of hemolymph nucleating agents in physical solutions. Cryobiology 1981, 18, 511–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hawes, T.C.; Wharton, D.A. Freeze fitness in alpine Tiger moth caterpillars and their parasitoids. Oecologia 2011, 167, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Paschke, D. Cold Tolerance Mechanisms of the New Zealand Alpine Wētā, Hemideina maori. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, R.E. A primer on insect cold-tolerance. In Low Temperature Biology of Insects; Denlinger, D.L., Lee, R.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chown, S.L.; Nicolson, S.W. Insect Physiological Ecology: Mechanisms and Patterns; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  27. Layne, J.R.; Edgar, C.L.; Mewith, R.E. Cold hardiness of the woolly bear caterpillar (Pyrrharctia isabella Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 1999, 141, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rozsypal, J.; Košťál, V. Supercooling and freezing as eco-physiological alternatives rather than mutually exclusive strategies: A case study in Pyrrhocoris apterus. J. Insect Physiol. 2018, 111, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. de Araujo, G.G.; Rodrigues, F.; Gonçalves, F.L.T.; Galante, D. Survival and ice nucleation activity of Pseudomonas syringae strains exposed to simulated high-altitude atmospheric conditions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Lee, R.E.; Lee, M.R.; Strong-Gunderson, J.M. Insect cold-hardiness and ice nucleating active microorganisms including their potential use for biological control. J. Insect Physiol. 1993, 39, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wharton, D.A. Supercooling and freezing tolerant animals. In Supercooling; Wilson, P., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ali, F.; Wharton, D.A. Ice-active substances from the infective juveniles of the freeze tolerant entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema feltiae. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Denton, M.; Marshall, C. Laws of form revisited. Nature 2001, 410, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Storey, K.B.; Storey, J.M. Molecular biology of freezing tolerance. Compr. Physiol. 2013, 3, 1283–1308. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, R.E.; Strong-Gunderson, J.M.; Lee, M.R.; Grove, K.S.; Riga, T.J. Isolation of ice nucleating active bacteria from insects. J. Exp. Zool. 1991, 257, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wharton, D.A.; Selvanesan, L.; Marshall, C.J. Ice-active proteins from New Zealand snow tussocks, Chionochloa macra and C. rigida. Cryo-Letters 2010, 31, 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, R.E.; Costanso, J.P.; Mugnano, J.A. Regulation of supercooling and ice nucleation in insects. Eur. J. Entomol. 1996, 93, 405–418. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilson, P.W.; Heneghan, A.F.; Haymet, A.D.J. Ice nucleation in nature: Supercooling point (SCP) measurements and the role of heterogeneous nucleation. Cryobiology 2003, 46, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hill, T.C.J.; Moffett, B.F.; Demott, P.J.; Georgakopoulos, D.G.; Stump, W.L.; Franc, D. Measurement of ice nucleation-active bacteria on plants and in precipitation by quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 1256–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Failor, K.C.; Schmale, D.G.; Vinatzer, B.A.; Monteil, C.L. Ice nucleation active bacteria in precipitation are genetically diverse and nucleate ice by employing different mechanisms. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2740–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Qui, Y.; Hudait, A.; Molinero, V. How size and aggregation of ice-binding proteins control their ice nucleation efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7439–7452. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vasebi, Y.; Llontop, M.E.M.; Hanlon, R.; Schmale, D.G.; Schnell, R.; Vinatzer, B.A. Comprehensive characterization of an aspen (Populus tremuloides) leaf litter sample that maintained ice nucleation activity for 48 years. Biogeosciences 2019, 16, 1675–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. O’Sullivan, D.; Murray, B.J.; Ross, J.F.; Webb, M.E. The adsorption of fungal ice-nucleating proteins on mineral dusts: A terrestrial reservoir of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 7879–7887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kunert, A.T.; Pöhlker, M.L.; Tang, K.; Krevert, C.S.; Wieder, C.; Speth, K.R.; Hanson, L.E.; Morris, C.E.; Schmale, D.G., III; Pöschl, U.; et al. Macromolecular fungal ice nuclei in Fusarium: Effects of physical and chemical processing. Biogeosciences 2019, 16, 4647–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wilson, M.; Lindow, S.E. Ecological similarity and coexistence of epiphytic ice-nucleating (Ice+) Pseudomonas syringae strains and a non-ice-nucleating (ice) biological control agent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 3128–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Duman, J.G.; Neven, L.G.; Beals, J.M.; Olson, K.R.; Castellino, F.J. Freeze-tolerance adaptations, including haemolymph protein and lipoprotein nucleators, in the larvae of the cranefly Tipula trivittata. J. Insect Physiol. 1985, 31, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Forbes, J.; Bissoyi, A.; Eickhoff, L.; Reicher, N.; Hansen, T.; Bon, C.G.; Walker, V.K.; Koop, T.; Rudich, Y.; Braslavsky, I.; et al. Water-organizing motif continuity is critical for potent ice nucleation protein activity. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gupta, R.; Deswal, R. Antifreeze proteins enable plants to survive in freezing conditions. J. Biosci. 2014, 39, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ganguly, M.; Dib, S.; Ariya, P. A Purely inorganic highly efficient ice nucleating particle. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 3384–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Cascajo-Castresana, M.; David, R.O.; Iriarte-Alonso, M.A.; Bittner, A.M.; Marcolli, C. Protein aggregates nucleate ice: The example of apoferritin. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 3291–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Dawkins, R. The Extended Phenotype; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1982; 307p. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hendry, L.P.; Bruijning, M.; Forsberg, S.K.G.; Ayroles, J.F. The microbiome extends host evolutionary potential. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sun, J.; Prabhu, A.; Aroney, S.T.N.; Rinke, C. Insights into plastic biodegradation: Community composition and functional capabilities of the superworm (Zophobas morio) microbiome in styrofoam feeding trials. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000916. [Google Scholar]
  54. Savio, C.; Mugo-Kamiri, L.; Upfold, J.K. Bugs in bugs: The role of probiotics and prebiotics in maintenance of health in mass-reared insects. Insects 2022, 13, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hammer, T.J.; Moran, N.A. Links between metamorphosis and symbiosis in holometabolous insects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2019, 374, 20190068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Nakano, M.; Morgan-Richards, M.; Trewick, S.A.; Clavijo-McCormick, A. Chemical ecology and olfaction in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Chem. Ecol. 2022, 48, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ferguson, L.V.; Dhakal, P.; Lebenzon, J.E.; Heinrichs, D.E.; Bucking, C.; Sinclair, B.J. Seasonal shifts in the insect gut microbiome are concurrent with changes in cold tolerance and immunity. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 2357–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sommer, F.; Ståhlman, M.; Ilkayeva, O.; Arnemo, J.; Kindberg, J.; Josefsson, J.; Newgard, C.; Fröbert, O.; Bäckhed, F. The gut microbiota modulates energy metabolism in the hibernating Brown Bear Ursus arctos. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 1655–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wharton, D.A.; Pow, B.; Kristensen, M.; Ramløv, H.; Marshall, C.J. Ice-active proteins and cryoprotectants from the New Zealand alpine cockroach, Celatoblatta quinquemaculata. J. Insect Physiol. 2009, 55, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Worland, M.R.; Sinclair, B.J.; Wharton, D.A. Ice nucleator activity in a New Zealand alpine cockroach C. quinquemaculata (Dictyoptera: Blattidae). Cryo-Letters 1997, 18, 327–334. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sinclair, B.J.; Worland, M.R.; Wharton, D.A. Ice nucleation and freezing tolerance in New Zealand alpine and lowland weta, Hemideina spp. (Orthoptera; Stenopelmatidae). Physiol. Entomol. 1999, 24, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Broderick, N.; Lemaitre, B. Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut Microbes 2021, 3, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Worland, M.R.; Block, W. Ice-nucleating bacteria from the guts of two sub-Antarctic beetles Hydromedion sparsutum and Perimylops antarcticus (Perimylopidae). Cryobiology 1999, 38, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tsumuki, H.; Konno, H.; Maeda, T.; Okamoto, Y. An ice-nucleating active fungus isolated from the gut of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Insect Physiol. 1992, 38, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Strong-Gunderson, J.M.; Lee, R.E.; Lee, M.R.; Riga, T.J. Ingestion of ice nucleating active bacteria increases the supercooling point of the lady beetle Hippodamia convergens. J. Insect Physiol. 1990, 36, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gupta, A.; Nair, S. Dynamics of insect-microbiome interaction influence host and microbial symbiont. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hosokawa, T.; Kikuchi, Y.; Nikoh, N.; Shimada, M.; Fukatsu, T. Strict Host-Symbiont Cospeciation and reductive genome evolution in insect gut bacteria. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kikuchi, Y.; Hosokawa, T.; Nikoh, N.; Meng, X.-Y.; Kamagata, Y.; Fukatsu, T. Host-symbiont co-speciation and reductive genome evolution in gut symbiotic bacteria of acanthosomatid stinkbugs. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Franco, F.P.; Túler, A.C.; Gallan, D.Z.; Gonçalves, F.G.; Favaris, A.P.; Peñaflor, M.F.G.V.; Leal, W.S.; Moura, D.S.; Bento, J.M.S.; Silva-Filho, M.C. Fungal phytopathogen modulates plant and insect response to promote it dissemination. ISME J. 2021, 15, 3522–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Engel, P.; Moran, N. A The gut microbiota of insects—Diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 699–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Nikoh, N.; Hosokawa, T.; Oshima, K.; Hattori, M.; Fukatsu, T. Reductive evolution of bacterial genome in insect gut environment. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3, 702–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Lavy, O.; Gophna, U.; Gefen, E.; Ayali, A. Locust bacterial symbionts: An update. Insects 2020, 11, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rosas, T.; García-Ferris, C.; Domínguez-Santos, R.; Llop, P.; Latorre, A.; Moya, A. Rifampicin treatment of Blattella germanica evidences a fecal transmission route of their gut microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fiy002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Trewick, S.A.; Wallis, G.P.; Morgan-Richards, M. The invertebrate life of New Zealand: A phylogeographic approach. Insects 2011, 2, 297–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Buckley, T.R.; Hoare, R.J.B.; Leschen, R.A.B. Key question on the evolution and biogeography of New Zealand alpine insects. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Block, W.; Wharton, D.; Sinclair, B. Cold tolerance of a New Zealand alpine cockroach, Celatoblatta quinquemaculata (Dictyoptera, Blattidae). Physiol. Entomol. 1998, 23, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ramløv, H.; Bedford, J.; Leader, J.; Ramurv, H. Freezing tolerance of the New Zealand alpine weta, Hemideina maori Hutton. J. Therm. Biol. 1992, 17, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hawes, T.C. Cryobiology canalization of freeze tolerance in an alpine grasshopper. Cryobiology 2015, 71, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hawes, T.C.; Wharton, D.A. Tolerance of freezing in caterpillars of the New Zealand Magpie moth (Nyctemera annulate). Physiol. Entomol. 2011, 35, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dennis, A.B.; Dunning, L.T.; Sinclair, B.J.; Buckley, T.R. Parallel molecular routes to cold adaptation in eight genera of New Zealand stick insects. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Twort, V.G.; Newcomb, R.D.; Buckley, T.R. New Zealand tree and giant wētā (Orthoptera) transcriptomics reveal divergent selection patterns in metabolic loci. Genome Biol. Evol. 2019, 11, 1293–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Koot, E.; Morgan-Richards, M.; Trewick, S.A. An alpine grasshopper radiation older than the hills, on the Southern Alps (Kā Tiritiri o te Moana) of New Zealand (Aotearoa). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2020, 147, 106783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sinclair, B.J. Field ecology of freeze tolerance: Interannual variation in cooling rates, freeze-thaw and thermal stress in the microhabitat of the alpine cockroach Celatoblatta quinquemaculata. Oikos 2001, 93, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sinclair, B.J. Seasonal variation in freezing tolerance of the New Zealand alpine cockroach Celatoblatta quinquemaculata. Ecol. Entomol. 1997, 22, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wharton, D.A. Cold tolerance of New Zealand alpine insects. J. Insect Physiol. 2011, 57, 1090–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Johns, P.M. The cockroaches of New Zealand. Rec. Canterb. Mus. 1966, 8, 93–136. [Google Scholar]
  87. Zervos, S. Protrellus dalei n. sp., Blatticola barryi n. sp., and Suifunema mackenziei n. sp., thelastomatid nematodes from New Zealand cockroaches. N. Z. J. Zool. 1987, 14, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Schauer, C.; Thompson, C.L.; Brune, A. The bacterial community in the gut of the cockroach Shelfordella lateralis reflects the close evolutionary relatedness of cockroaches and termites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2758–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sabree, Z.L.; Kambhamptis, S.; Moran, N.A. Nitrogen recycling and nutritional provisioning by Blattabacterium, the cockroach endosymbiont. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 106, 19521–19526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Sinclair, B.J.; Renault, D. Intracellular ice formation in insects: Unresolved after 50 years? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2010, 155, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Thorne, M.A.S.; Seybold, A.; Marshall, C.; Wharton, D. Molecular snapshot of an intracellular freezing event in an Antarctic nematode. Cryobiology 2017, 75, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ramløv, H.; Westh, P. Ice formation in the freeze tolerant alpine weta Hemideina maori Hutton (Orthoptera, Stenopelmatidae). Cryo-Letters 1993, 14, 169–176. [Google Scholar]
  93. Trewick, S.A.; Morgan-Richards, M. After the deluge: Mitochondrial DNA indicates Miocene radiation and Pliocene adaptation of tree and giant weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). J. Biogeog. 2005, 32, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Trewick, S.A.; Wallis, G.P.; Morgan-Richards, M. Phylogeographic pattern correlates with Pliocene mountain-building in the alpine scree weta (Orthoptera, Anostostomatidae). Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. King, K.J.; Sinclair, B.J. Water loss in tree weta (Hemideina): Adaptation to the montane environment and a test of the melanisation-desiccation resistance hypothesis. J. Exp. Biol. 2015, 218, 1995–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Hance, T.; Boivin, G. Effect of parasitism by Anaphes sp. (Hyme- noptera: Mymaridae) on the cold hardiness of Listronotus oregonensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) eggs. Can. J. Zool. 1993, 71, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nowierski, R.M.; Fitzgerald, B.C. Supercooling capacity of Eurasian and North American populations of parasitoids of the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia. Biocontrol 2002, 47, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tyrell, C.; Wharton, D.A.; Ramløv, H.; Moller, H. Cold tolerance of an endoparasitic nematode within a freezing-tolerant orthopteran host. Parasitology 1994, 109, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ward, D.F.; Thomas, F.; Poulin, R. Fluctuating asymmetry and parasitism in six New Zealand insects. Acta Oecol. 1998, 19, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hawes, T.C. Integumental buffering in an alpine grasshopper. Physiol. Entomol. 2014, 39, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Xiong, H. Ice Activities in New Zealand Chionochloa Species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  102. White, E.G.; Watson, R.N. A food consumption study of three New Zealand alpine grasshopper species. N. Z. Agric. Res. 1972, 15, 867–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lukas, M.; Schwidetzky, R.; Eufemio, R.; Bonn, M.; Meister, K. Towards understanding bacterial ice nucleation. J. Physl. Chem. B 2022, 126, 1861–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Waite, D.W.; Dsouza, M.; Biswas, K.; Ward, D.F.; Deines, P.; Taylor, M.W. Microbial community structure in the gut of the New Zealand insect Auckland tree weta (Hemideina thoracica). Arch. Microbiol. 2015, 197, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huson, D.H.; Auch, A.F.; Qi, J.; Schuster, S.C. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Marshall, C.J.; Basu, K.; Davies, P.L. Ice-shell purification of ice-binding proteins. Cryobiology 2016, 72, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Marcelino, V.R.; Wille, M.; Hurt, A.C.; González-Acuña, D.; Klaassen, M.; Schlub, T.E.; Eden, J.S.; Shi, M.; Iredell, J.R.; Sorrell, T.C.; et al. Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes. BMC Biol. 2019, 17, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Muñoz-Benavent, M.; Pérez-Cobas, A.E.; García-Ferris, C.; Moya, A.; Latorre, A. Insects’ potential: Understanding the functional role of their gut microbiome. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 194, 113787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Culviner, P.H.; Guegler, C.K.; Laub, M.T. A simple, cost-effective, and robust method for rRNA depletion in RNA-Sequencing studies. MBio 2020, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Song, S.J.; Sanders, J.G.; Baldassarre, D.T.; Chaves, J.A.; Johnson, N.S.; Piaggio, A.J.; Stuckey, M.J.; Nováková, E.; Metcalf, J.L.; Chomel, B.B.; et al. Is there convergence of gut microbes in blood-feeding vertebrates? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 374, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Cookson, A.L.; Biggs, P.J.; Marshall, J.C.; Reynolds, A.; Collis, R.M.; French, N.P.; Brightwell, G. Culture independent analysis using gnd as a target gene to assess Escherichia coli diversity and community structure. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Purcell, R.V.; Visnovska, M.; Biggs, P.J.; Schmeier, S.; Frizelle, F.A. Distinct gut microbiome patterns associate with consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The metric temperature scale introduced by Anders Celsius is based on prominent phase changes of water; freezing at 0 °C and boiling at 100 °C at 1 atmosphere pressure. (A) Water phase changes, solid from vapour, vapour from liquid, and liquid from solid, reflect temperature and pressure. These meet at a single point called the triple point, where all three phases can coexist. (B) However, supercooling of water occurs when temperature reduction below 0 °C is not accompanied by crystallization. In biological systems the formation of ice decreases the density by nearly ~9%, leading to an increase in volume of the crystalline structure (ice) that can disrupt tissues. Density changes are illustrated over the ~40 °C range likely to be experienced by New Zealand alpine insects. (C) Droplet size influences the temperature at which water phase change occurs (liquid to ice) as demonstrated by Heverly (1949) [14] who cooled water droplets of different sizes to measure their temperature of crystallization, and noted that at this scale the purity of the water used had little effect (colours indicates origin of water).
Figure 1. The metric temperature scale introduced by Anders Celsius is based on prominent phase changes of water; freezing at 0 °C and boiling at 100 °C at 1 atmosphere pressure. (A) Water phase changes, solid from vapour, vapour from liquid, and liquid from solid, reflect temperature and pressure. These meet at a single point called the triple point, where all three phases can coexist. (B) However, supercooling of water occurs when temperature reduction below 0 °C is not accompanied by crystallization. In biological systems the formation of ice decreases the density by nearly ~9%, leading to an increase in volume of the crystalline structure (ice) that can disrupt tissues. Density changes are illustrated over the ~40 °C range likely to be experienced by New Zealand alpine insects. (C) Droplet size influences the temperature at which water phase change occurs (liquid to ice) as demonstrated by Heverly (1949) [14] who cooled water droplets of different sizes to measure their temperature of crystallization, and noted that at this scale the purity of the water used had little effect (colours indicates origin of water).
Insects 14 00089 g001
Figure 4. Ice-nucleating bacteria bring the temperature of crystallization of water droplets to close to 0 °C (spots) compared to pure water or water containing non-ice-nucleating bacteria (E. coli). When Hippodamia convergens beetles consume these same bacteria (P. syringae, P. agglomerans (formerly Enterobacter agglomerans), and E. taylorae), they freeze at a higher temperature (shown as vertical lines; see [30,35,65]).
Figure 4. Ice-nucleating bacteria bring the temperature of crystallization of water droplets to close to 0 °C (spots) compared to pure water or water containing non-ice-nucleating bacteria (E. coli). When Hippodamia convergens beetles consume these same bacteria (P. syringae, P. agglomerans (formerly Enterobacter agglomerans), and E. taylorae), they freeze at a higher temperature (shown as vertical lines; see [30,35,65]).
Insects 14 00089 g004
Table 1. Comparison of critical temperatures for three alpine insects from Aotearoa-New Zealand.
Table 1. Comparison of critical temperatures for three alpine insects from Aotearoa-New Zealand.
TaxonSpeciesTemperature of Crystallization °CLower Lethal
Temperature °C
% of Body Water FrozenInitiation of Freezing
CockroachCelatoblatta quinquemaculata−5.4−8.974gut
WētāHemideina maori−3.8−1082hindgut
GrasshopperSigaus australis−4−11Not knownNot known
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morgan-Richards, M.; Marshall, C.J.; Biggs, P.J.; Trewick, S.A. Insect Freeze-Tolerance Downunder: The Microbial Connection. Insects 2023, 14, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010089

AMA Style

Morgan-Richards M, Marshall CJ, Biggs PJ, Trewick SA. Insect Freeze-Tolerance Downunder: The Microbial Connection. Insects. 2023; 14(1):89. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morgan-Richards, Mary, Craig J. Marshall, Patrick J. Biggs, and Steven A. Trewick. 2023. "Insect Freeze-Tolerance Downunder: The Microbial Connection" Insects 14, no. 1: 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop