Next Article in Journal
(Epi)Genetic Mechanisms Underlying the Evolutionary Success of Eusocial Insects
Previous Article in Journal
Pinyon Engraver Beetle Acoustics: Stridulation Apparatus, Sound Production and Behavioral Response to Vibroacoustic Treatments in Logs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/insects12060497
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Can Plant Lectins Help to Elucidate Insect Lectin-Mediated Immune Response?

by
Pengyu Chen
1,2,
Kristof De Schutter
1,
Els J. M. Van Damme
2 and
Guy Smagghe
1,*
1
Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(6), 497; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060497
Submission received: 3 May 2021 / Revised: 23 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lectins are proteins that can recognize and selectively bind specific sugar structures. These proteins are present in all kingdoms of life, including plants, animals, fungi and microorganisms and play a role in a broad range of processes. The interactions between lectins and their target carbohydrates play a primordial role in plant and animal immune systems. Despite being the largest and most diverse taxa on earth, the study of lectins and their functions in insects is lagging behind. To study the role of insect lectins in the immune response, plant lectins could provide an interesting tool. Plant lectins have been well characterized and many of them possess immunomodulatory properties in vertebrate cells. The increasing knowledge on the immunomodulatory effects of plant lectins could complement the missing knowledge on the endogenous insect lectins and contribute to understanding the processes and mechanisms by which lectins participate in insect immunity. This review summarizes existing studies of immune responses stimulated by endogenous or exogenous lectins.

Abstract

Lectins are carbohydrate-binding proteins that recognize and selectively bind to specific sugar structures. This group of proteins is widespread in plants, animals, and microorganisms, and exerts a broad range of functions. Many plant lectins were identified as exogenous stimuli of vertebrate immunity. Despite being the largest and most diverse taxon on earth, the study of lectins and their functions in insects is lagging behind. In insects, research on lectins and their biological importance has mainly focused on the C-type lectin (CTL) family, limiting our global understanding of the function of insect lectins and their role in insect immunity. In contrast, plant lectins have been well characterized and the immunomodulatory effects of several plant lectins have been documented extensively in vertebrates. This information could complement the missing knowledge on endogenous insect lectins and contribute to understanding of the processes and mechanisms by which lectins participate in insect immunity. This review summarizes existing studies of immune responses stimulated by endogenous or exogenous lectins. Understanding how lectins modulate insect immune responses can provide insight which, in turn, can help to elaborate novel ideas applicable for the protection of beneficial insects and the development of novel pest control strategies.

1. Introduction

Lectins are unique proteins that are characterized by their ability to selectively bind to specific carbohydrate residues. These sugar structures can be monosaccharides, disaccharides, or polysaccharides, and can be present as free sugars or as glycoconjugates linked to proteins and lipids. In the past, lectins were found to agglutinate red blood cells; therefore, they were often referred to as “hemagglutinins” or “agglutinins” [1]. Subsequent research indicated that agglutination is not universal for all lectins. Only some plant lectins will agglutinate certain types of cells, and this aggregation of cells can be blocked by preincubation with specific sugars. Consequently the word “lectin”, meaning “to select”, was introduced to replace the term hemagglutinin [2].
Because of their selectivity in carbohydrate binding, lectins play crucial roles in a multitude of biological processes in plants, animals, and microorganisms. For example, many plant lectins serve as defense proteins and are harmful to insects or pathogens [3]. Similarly, some animals can secrete lectins that can kill bacteria by forming pore structures on their membranes [4]. Bacteria use their surface lectins to adhere to host cells for invasion [5]. Inside cells, lectins participate in protein quality control [6]. In the extracellular matrix, some lectins alter ion transport [7]. Secreted lectins have also been reported to be involved in host immunity due to their ability in pathogen recognition [8,9].
This review focuses on the role of lectins in insect immunity. In addition, the question is raised whether the study of immunomodulatory effects of plants lectins can complement our knowledge of the functions of insect lectins in the immune response. A better understanding of the lectin-related, insect-immunity-related processes can provide a perspective for the protection of beneficial/economical insects, and can also help in the development of new pest control strategies.

2. Insect Innate Immunity

Animals are frequently challenged by invading pathogens such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, parasites, etc. Furthermore, they also harbor a microbiome in tissues such as the intestine and the hemolymph [10]. To maintain homeostasis and system integrity, animal hosts must regulate their own microbiota and eliminate pathogen infection through an elaborate immune system [11]. While mammalians have both an adaptive (depending on memory immune cells) and an innate immunity system, insects mainly depend on innate immunity when threatened by pathogens. Nonetheless, insects have evolved to be very successful organisms, occupying almost every habitat and ecological niche. This is due to a strong innate immune system consisting of a cellular and a humoral component (reviewed by [12,13,14]). The cellular defense is initiated instantly when pathogens are detected and results in the phagocytosis of smaller pathogens or encapsulation of bigger invaders [13,14]. The humoral defense is a relatively slow response and involves the production of a series of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), complement proteins, lysozymes, protease inhibitors, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and enzyme cascades leading to the formation of melanin and clotting [12,14].
The cellular or humoral immunity system depends on the presence of immune cells of different types. These immune cell types can differ between insect species. For example, the mosquito Aedes aegypti has more kinds of immune cells identified than Drosophila [15]. The immune cells, called hemocytes due to their presence in the hemolymph, have differentiated from prohemocytes and are mainly composed of three highly differentiated cell types: the plasmatocytes, crystal cells, and lamellocytes [14,16]. Plasmatocytes represent more than 90% of the hemocyte pool. These cells have been shown in vitro to possess strong adhesive features, enabling them to surround and engulf pathogens, and to produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) for the humoral defense [14,15]. Unlike plasmatocytes, crystal cells are not adhesive, but they can express phenoloxidase, the key enzyme in the formation of melanin involved in wound healing and melanization [17]. Lamellocytes are large adhesive cells that are only present in larva or in infected adults, and are involved in melanization and encapsulation [15].

3. Insect Lectins

Insects are the largest and most diverse group of animals, and more and more insect lectins are being discovered. Lectin classification is important to cope with the diversity of these proteins. Insect lectins can be grouped according to the animal classification system, which encompasses 16 families of lectins, each with a characteristic carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD) [18].
In insects, most of the identified endogenous lectins belong to the C-type lectin (CTL) family. Canonical CTLs bind sugars through their CRD, and this interaction is dependent on Ca2+, hence the name “C-type lectins”. The CRD motif of CTLs is versatile, resulting in broad range of carbohydrate-binding interactions. For example, the Glu-Pro-Asn (EPN) motif in the CRD binds mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, L-fucose, and glucose, while galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine are recognized by the Gln-Pro-Asp (QPD) motif [19,20]. Many other motifs have been identified in insects, such as QPS, QPN, APD, and MPP, among others [21], but their carbohydrate-binding activities need to be confirmed. According to their complexity, CTLs can further be classified into subfamilies such as collectins (collagen-containing C-type lectins), endocytic receptors, selectins, etc. [22]. Based on sequence homology, proteins with a CTL domain have been identified in at least 12 insects belonging to different orders, including model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster, Bombyx mori, Manduca sexta, Tribolium castaneum and Nilaparvata lugens [9,21]. Expression of some of these putative lectins was verified by quantitative real-time PCR [21]. In each of these insect genomes, about 7–40 putative CTLs have been identified and most contain a signal peptide, indicating these proteins are probably secreted extracellularly [9]. The majority of these CTLs have a single CRD, but M. sexta, Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura possess lectins with a dual-CRD structure (also named the immulectin family). The CTL domain can be linked to other functional domains (CTL-X) such as an epidermal-growth-factor-like domain (EGF) or a chitin-binding domain (CBM), which greatly increases the functional diversity among CTLs [9]. Being the largest lectin family in insects, CTLs are involved in a broad range of processes, especially the immune responses (Table 1).
Malectin and calnexin/calreticulin are protein chaperones located in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum). During translation, an N-glycan precursor (Glc3Man9GlcNAc2) is attached to the newly synthesized polypeptide. The processing of the precursor glycan by glucosidases yields bi-, mono-, and non-glucosylated N-glycans, which creates signals for glycoprotein folding and quality control mediated by the chaperone lectins. Malectin binds to Glc2-N-glycans, whereas calnexin/calreticulin binds to Glc1-N-glycans [6,23,24]. Malectins in the invertebrate scallop Chlamys farreri and big-belly seahorse Hippocampus abdominalis are regulated by pathogen infection [25,26], suggesting their participation in immunity. Orthologs of malectins have been identified in D. melanogaster and A. aegypti, but have not been studied yet [27,28]. Calnexin/calreticulin chaperones have been identified in B. mori [29,30] and D. melanogaster [31,32]. In Drosophila, calnexin was reported to be related to neuron functions and sodium channel regulation [31,32].
F-type lectins (FTL) preferentially bind to fucose through a carbohydrate-binding domain composed of the HX(26)RXDX(4)R/K sequence motif [33,34]. The first FTL identified in insects was the lectin encoded by the Drosophila furrowed gene, and the furrowed protein is associated with a CTL domain and Sushi repeats [33,35,36]. Drosophila furrowed participates in planar cell polarity signaling and is crucial for cell adhesion [37]. The F-type lectin domain is also predicted in Anopheles gambiae, but its function has not been verified yet [35,36].
Chitinase-like proteins (CLPs) gained their name due to their chitin-binding ability. In contrast to chitinases, these proteins lack the enzymatic activity to digest chitin due to the absence of essential catalytic residues in the consensus motif [38]. In Drosophila, the most notable CLPs are the imaginal disc growth factors (IDGFs), composed of six glycoproteins which participate in cellular functions like proliferation, mobility, and immune recognition [38,39]. Sequences encoding CLPs have been predicted in at least in 10 insects including model insects like the red flour beetle, T. castaneum, N. lugens, and mosquito, A. gambiae; sequences encoding CLPs were predicted, but since the homology search is based on a motif of catalytic residues, some of these CLPs identified are actually true chitinases [40,41,42,43], which are normally not considered to be lectins [44,45].
L-type lectins are soluble ER luminal compounds which contain a CRD similar to those of leguminous plant lectins such as concanavalin A (Con A), and some L-type lectins are responsible for glycoprotein sorting and trafficking [20,46]. Drosophila has a homolog of ER–Golgi intermediate compartment 53 (ERGIC-53), a human L-type lectin responsible for cargo transport of glycoproteins [47,48], which may be related to the adhesion protein talin [49]. B. mori also has an ERGIC-53 homolog which responds to insecticide treatment [50]. The L-type lectin LvLTLC1 was reported to be upregulated after pathogen stimuli in shrimp [46], but this was not reported in insects.
Galectins or S-type lectins contain a CRD that specifically binds to β-galactosides [51], although other carbohydrate ligands have also been reported. For example, the galectin Agalectin from A. gambiae caused agglutination that was inhibited by gangliosides, sulfated polysaccharides, and sialic acid-containing glycans [52,53]. Galectins in human can be further classified into three major groups: prototypical galectins, chimeric lectins, and tandem-repeat galectins, according to their CRD organization [54]. Many animal lectins are glycosylated, but the galectin family seems to be an exception [55,56]. Galectins have been reported in a few insects, including D. melanogaster, A. gambiae, A. aegypti, and the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi [57,58,59,60,61]. Galectins expressed in the insect gut have been shown to participate in the neutralization of bacterial toxins [57,58].
I-type lectins belong to the immunoglobulin gene superfamily (IgSF). Hemolins, the well-studied I-type lectins of D. melanogaster, S. exigua, and M. sexta, recognize lipopolysaccharides, and their expression was shown to be induced after bacterial infection [62]. Further studies suggest that hemolin facilitates phagocytosis of bacteria and encapsulation of synthetic beads [62,63,64].
R-type lectins have a CRD similar to ricin, the toxic plant lectin from castor bean. Most R-type CRDs are ligated to other functional domains, including the CTL domain (mannose receptor family), pore-forming domain, and GalNAc-transferase domain. In the genome of D. melanogaster, 14 GalNAc-transferases have been identified containing R-type CRDs at their carboxy terminals. A QxW repeat in the CRD was supposed to be an important motif for carbohydrate binding [65,66].
Other lectin families common in animals, such as P-type and X-type lectins, are seldom identified in invertebrates [18] although previous searches in insect genome sequences predicted their existence [20].
Table
Table 1. Overview of insect lectins.
Table 1. Overview of insect lectins.
Lectin FamiliesInsect SpeciesGene/Protein aLectin FunctionsExperiment
Verification		Predicted by GO/HomologyReferences
RNA bProtein c
CTLAedes aegyptiAaeCTLs; CTL-20; mosGCTL-7Pathogen recognition; interacts with phosphatase; reduces exogenous toxin toxicity++ [9,67,68,69]
Tribolium castaneumTcCTL6, TcCTL3Responds to pathogen infection; regulates AMP expression + [70,71]
Spodoptera lituraSliCTLsResponds to pathogen infection+ [21]
Mythimna separataEPLPromotes encapsulation+ [72]
Ostrinia furnacalisOfCTLs, OfIMLs + [73]
Spodoptera exiguaSe-LLs, Se-BLLsResponds to virus infection+ [74]
Thitarodes xiaojinensisCTL-S, CTL-X, IMLsResponds to pathogen infection+ [75]
Helicoverpa armigeraHa-lectin, HaCTLRegulates ecdysone and juvenile hormone signaling; regulates AMP expression; promotes phagocytosis + [76]
Drosophila melanogasterSlf, DL2-3Organizes the cuticle layers; enhances encapsulation + [77,78]
Antheraea pernyiAp-CTBinds PAMPs; activates PO +
Bombyx moriBmIML, BmMBP, CTL-S3, BmEL-1, 2, 3Recognizes PAMPs; activates PO; promotes melanization; +
Hyphantria cuneaHdd15 +
Periplaneta americanaLPS-BPResponds to E. coli +
Heliothis virescensMBL + Reviewed by [9]
Manduca sextaMsIML-1, 2, 3, 4Responds to pathogens; binds PAMPs; activates PO; enhances encapsulation +
Anopheles gambiaeAgamCTLsResponds to pathogens
Nilaparvata lugens n.d.
Plutella xylostella n.d.
Apis mellifera n.d.
Acyrthosiphon pisum n.d.
Chitinase likeAcyrthosiphon pisumAcypiCht1 (IDGF homologue)Expresses in bacteriocyte and midgut+ [41]
Anopheles gambiaeAgIDGF2, AgIDGF4 Expresses in different developmental stages and tissues+ [79]
Bombyx moriBmIDGFExpresses in eggs, hemocytes, fat body, and silk gland + [80,81]
Drosophila melanogasterIDGF1-6Participates in would healing and wing development++ [38,39,82]
Nilaparvata lugensNlIDGFExpresses in female reproductive organs and fat body+ [42]
Tribolium castaneumTcIDGF2, 4Acts in adult eclosion+ [83]
Plutella xylostellaPxIDGFn.d. +[84]
Manduca sextaMsIDGF1n.d. +[85]
Bemisia tabaciBtIDGF1-3Highly abundant in adults+ [86]
GalectinDrosophila melanogasterDmgalExpresses in hemocytes and in different developmental stages + [59,87]
Phlebotomus papatasiPpGalecStrong expression in adult female; binds pathogen [61]
Anopheles gambiaeAgalectin, GALE6-8Expresses in salivary gland; Responds to viral infection++ [52,88]
Bombyx moriBmGalectin-4Responds to bacteria in fertilized eggs; binds bacteria + [89]
Aedes aegyptigalectin-6, galectin-14Reduces exogenous toxin toxicity + [57,58]
Anopheles darlingi n.d.
Anopheles stephensi n.d.
Culex quinquefasciatus n.d.
Drosophila ananassae n.d.
Drosophila mojavensis n.d.
Drosophila pseudoobscura n.d.
Drosophila virilis n.d. +Predicted by [87]
Drosophila willistoni n.d.
Drosophila yakuba n.d.
Glossina morsitans n.d.
Malus domestica n.d.
malectinAedes aegypti n.d. +[27,28]
Drosophila melanogaster n.d. +
Calnexin/calreticulinBombyx moriCalr/Canx; BmCNXResponds to ER stress++ [30,90]
Drosophila melanogasterCnxRegulates the function of sodium channel paralytic + [32]
F-type lectinDrosophila melanogasterFurrowedFunctions in planar cell polarity + [37]
Anopheles gambiae n.d. Reviewed by [36]
I-type (immuno-globulin fold)Drosophila melanogasterhemolinn.d. + Reviewed by [91]
Manduca sextaHEMRecognizes PAMPs; promotes nodulation, hemocyte aggregation, and phagocytosis [63]
Spodoptera exiguaSeHemActs as opsonin; regulates phagocytic activities and encapsulation + [62]
Plodia interpunctellaPiHemFunction related to gut bacteria+ [92]
Bombyx moriHemolinn.d. +[93]
Actias seleneAs-HEM Mediates immune response + [94]
Antheraea pernyiHemolinRegulates innate immunity + [95]
L-typeDrosophila melanogasterERGIC-53 homologn.d. [48], reviewed by [96]
Bombyx moriERGIC-53Responds to ER stress+ [50]
R-type (ricin B type)Drosophila melanogasterlectin domain of GalNAc TransferaseBinds glycopeptides + [97], reviewed by [65]
a some publications have predicted lectins but did not assign names for these lectins; therefore, there are some blanks in the table. b RNA verification studies included RT-qPCR, dsRNA silencing, and transcriptome analysis. c Protein verification included immunoblotting, recombinant protein production, etc.

4. Endogenous Insect Lectins as Immune Modulators

4.1. Pathogen Recognition

Before hemocytes can activate the immune response, the pathogen or immune target must be recognized. During pathogen invasion, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as bacterial peptidoglycan or fungal β-1,3-glucan are recognized by specialized proteins called pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) [98]. The Gram-negative binding proteins (GNBPs), and peptidoglycan-recognition proteins (PGRPs) are the two major PRR families. GNBPs mainly recognize fungal and Gram-negative bacterial PAMPs, while PGRPs mainly respond to Gram-positive bacteria [98]. Since many PAMPs are carbohydrate structures, lectins constitute important parts of the membrane-bound or extracellular PRRs of hosts.
Lectins have been reported to bind and aggregate pathogens such as bacteria because of their recognition of carbohydrate structures. CTLs of H. armigera and M. sexta were shown to bind various PAMPs, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), fungal glucan, and peptidoglycan, to activate the humoral and cellular immune defenses [9,76,99,100]. In Drosophila, CTLs such as DL2 and DL3 can either be secreted or bound to the plasma membranes of hemocytes, and they were shown to bind some Gram-negative bacteria and agglutinate them [15]. While many insect PRRs belong to the C-type lectin family, lectins from other families can also function as PRRs. For example, galectins have been reported to recognize and bind pathogen surface glycans [53]. The silkworm B. mori possesses a dual-CRD galectin which can bind a series of PAMPs, such as LPS, LTA (lipoteichoic acid), peptidoglycan, and laminarin, and was shown to agglutinate E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis [89,101].

4.2. Lectin-Induced Cellular Immunity

4.2.1. Phagocytosis

Many hemocytes can engulf invading pathogens as well as dead cells or other entities in a process called phagocytosis [13,102]. Upstream events of phagocytosis include the recognition of the targets by the PRRs, which activates downstream events including receptor cross-linking, membrane remodeling, phagosome formation, and maturation, and finally phagosome fusion with the endosomes and lysosomes to kill the pathogens via the acidic environment, AMPs, digestive enzymes, etc. [103]. To increase the efficiency of phagocytosis, hemocytes sometimes rely on opsonins, molecules that can coat and aggregate pathogens such as bacteria and viruses to limit their mobility and promote recognition [103]. Lectins have been proven to stimulate phagocytosis by acting as PRRs to detect pathogens or as opsonins to coat the invaders. For example, rHa, a CTL lectin obtained from H. armigera, has two CRDs which are both required for lectin agglutination of rabbit erythrocytes, but any single domain is sufficient for aggregation of Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and fungi. Injection of rHa lectin together with Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria in insects efficiently decreased the B. thuringiensis number in vivo, and hemocytes of H. armigera engulfed more B. thuringiensis in the presence of rHa lectin [104]. CTL-mediated phagocytosis has also been observed in mammalians and shrimps [105,106]. Besides the CTLs, the I-type lectin hemolin SeHem from S. exigua also helped the host cells to eliminate bacteria by enhancing phagocytosis [62]. Galectins from crustaceans have been reported to enhance host phagocytosis [107] but there are no such reports for insect galectins.

4.2.2. Encapsulation

When the invading targets are too large, such as parasitoids or nematodes, a group of hemocytes is recruited to surround the target, forming a capsule-like structure in a process termed encapsulation. In Drosophila, lamellocyte precursor cells are activated upon infection with parasitic wasp eggs and will differentiate into mature forms [16,108]. These cells are recruited to the site of infection, attach to the surface of the parasites, and undergo morphological changes to spread around the parasitoids [16]. The process in which the lamellocytes are flattened is called cell spreading and relies on phosphatase/kinase-mediated cytoskeleton rearrangement and activation of adhesion proteins [109,110,111]. Cell spreading is a very fast reaction; a mere 20 min after stimulation, most Drosophila S2 cells had already entered this spreading state [112]. The spread cells cover the parasite to form the capsule. Stabilization of the capsule depends first on intercellular septate junctions. These ladder-like structures are composed of multiple adhesion proteins such as contactin, neurexin, fibronectin, etc. [113]. Second, melanization follows to strengthen the capsule and to kill the parasites. Melanization is a process in which phenols are oxidized to quinones that can be polymerized to form melanin [114]. The deposition of melanin will darken the capsule [115]. Encapsulated targets are restricted in their movement and are finally killed directly by melanization-derived toxic components such as quinones, reactive oxygen intermediates, and AMPs [115], or indirectly by nutrient deprivation [116].
Insect lectins have been shown to be involved in both encapsulation and melanization. One common method used to study encapsulation in vitro is the use of synthetic beads incubated with isolated hemocytes. Synthetic beads such as agarose or Sephadex can attract hemocytes which form capsules around the beads that can be easily observed under a microscope [109]. Coating of these beads with stimulating proteins can accelerate and increase encapsulation [78]. For example, recombinantly produced Drosophila CTLs DL2 and DL3 were coated onto Ni-NTA agarose beads which can attract hemocyte attachment. These hemocytes aggregated to the bead surface to form capsules and became darker colored after longer incubations, and this process was blocked by antibodies targeted against the recombinant proteins [78]. Besides the in vitro test, injecting the coated beads into an insect hemocoel also validated the hypothesis. In H. armigera, a CTL, HaCTL3, was coated onto Sephadex A-25 beads and injected into the H. armigera larval hemocoel. After 12 h, the beads were found to be extensively encapsulated and melanized [99]. Besides CTLs, the I-type lectin SeHem was also reported to coat nonself targets for encapsulation [62]. While many lectins have been reported to participate in encapsulation and melanization [9], it is not very clear which receptors on the plasma membrane are responsible for the effect. One possible explanation is through interaction with integrins. Evidence suggests that silencing of β-integrin, a hemocyte membrane protein participating in cell–cell adhesion and signal transduction, can effectively decrease the encapsulation of beads [99]. In addition, CTL-mediated melanization is suggested to be specific. In one in vitro test, the immune lectin MsIML from M. sexta was shown to be able to activate a protease cascade required for phenoloxidase activation, which only happens when this lectin binds to LPS. Phenoloxidase has been proven to be a key enzyme for melanization [114,117].

4.3. Lectin-Induced AMP Expression

Besides the cellular response, the insect host can secrete a series of extracellular effector molecules that can kill foreign invaders. Among these effectors, AMPs are the major participants [118]. AMPs are positively charged small peptides consisting of 15–45 amino acids, which can bind to the normally negatively charged surface of microbes and lead to membrane rupture and cell lysis [119]. The healthy host cells are protected from AMP damage mainly by the cholesterol-rich plasma membrane which makes healthy cells positively charged to repulse cationic AMP attachment [119]. However, when host cells are not healthy, they can be attacked by the AMPs. In a study of Drosophila tumor genesis, tumor cells tended to have a negatively charged cell surface due to the phosphatidylserine turning inside out, allowing the AMP defensin to locate and attack these cells to limit the tumor growth [120].
Classification of AMPs can vary based on different criteria, such as the type of the target microbe (antifungal or anti-Gram-positive/negative-bacterial AMPs) or based on the pathway by which they are activated (such as Toll-regulated or Imd-regulated AMPs) [118]. However, neither classification system can perfectly group different AMPs. While AMPs like drosomycin (Drs) are highly specific against fungal infections, other AMPs have a broader pathogen specificity. For example, metchnikowin (Mtk) can target all three groups of pathogens mentioned above. In addition, AMP regulation can also be complex; for example, while Drs is regulated by the Toll pathway, many others, such as defensin (Def), are coregulated by both pathways [118,119].
The insect fat body around the body cavity is the major tissue secreting AMPs [121]. When stimulated by a pathogen, the AMP titers in the hemolymph can drastically increase within 30 min and the concentration can reach up to 300 µM (reviewed by [15]). In addition to the fat body cells, hemocytes can also produce AMPs. For example, isolated hemocytes from the blue blowfly, Calliphora vicina, showed the same ability to produce AMPs such as defensin, cecropin, diptericins, and proline-rich peptides [111]. Drosophila hemocyte-like S2 cells have also been shown to produce all kinds of AMPs upon stimulation by E. coli or other protein stimuli [112,122].
Insect lectin-mediated pathogen recognition can trigger the production of AMPs. Insect lectins are commonly coregulated with AMPs [123], but a recent study gave more direct evidence that the insect lectin can regulate AMPs. After silencing of HaCTL3, a CTL from H. armigera participating in larval development, the fat body expressed far less AMPs than in the control group. HaCTL3 was found to regulate different AMPs, including lebocin, attacin, cecropin 1, pre-gloverin, pre-lebocin, and cecropin, of which the antimicrobial activities were confirmed by in vitro assays. Even more interestingly, the upstream PRRs, including PGRPs, β-1,3-GRPs, and even a CTL4, were also downregulated, suggesting that lectin-regulated AMP production might be initiated by affecting upstream recognition events [76].
Within host immunity, insect lectins and AMPs can have complex interactions. Insect lectins can protect the beneficial host microbiome against the toxic effects of AMPs. For example, silencing of A. aegypti C-type lectins (mosGCTLs), which are coregulated with AMP through the Imd pathway, leads to failure of colonization and maintenance of the gut microbial flora [124]. In addition, AMP toxicity significantly decreased when bacteria were pre-coated by mosGCTLs, which blocked AMP deposition on the bacterial surface [124]. Viruses are also reported to use host lectins. The West Nile virus (WNV), a pathogen causing West Nile fever and transmitted by mosquitos, can stimulate expression of an A. aegypti C-type lectin, mosGCTL-1, which can strongly interact with a mosquito phosphatase, mosPTP-1. WNV uses mosGCTL-1 to coat its surface and enters cells through interaction with mosPTP-1 [125].

5. Plant Lectins as Exogenous Immune Modulators

Similarly to the animal lectins, plant lectins have many important biological functions. In addition, many plant lectins possess entomotoxic properties, which has led to interest in these proteins for the development of novel pest control strategies. In addition, in recent years, the immunomodulatory effects of plant lectins have attracted attention for potential medical and pharmaceutical applications. In mammalians, it has been shown that many plant lectins display immunomodulatory activities after interaction with glycan moieties of immune cells (Figure 1).
While the knowledge of the endogenous insect lectins is lagging, the knowledge of the molecular effects of plant lectins might be useful in elucidating the functions and modes of action of insect lectins in the immune system.

5.1. Immunomodulatory Effects of Plant Lectins in Mammalian Cells

5.1.1. Plant Lectins Interact with Immune-Related Proteins and Enhance Pathogen Recognition

Upstream events of immunomodulatory plant lectins involve interactions with proteins of mammalian immune cells. ArtinM (also known as KM+) is a mannose-specific jacalin-related lectin from Artocarpus heterophyllus (jackfruit) seeds. ArtinM was reported to interact with the neutrophile cellular surface receptor CXCR2 through binding to its N-glycan [126], triggering G-protein dependent signaling and tyrosine phosphorylation for downstream effects [127]. Since mannose can block these upstream events, the lectin–carbohydrate interaction seemed to be crucial to the ArtinM immunomodulatory effects. ArtinM was also reported to interact with the neutrophil laminin [128], mast cell IgE receptor (Fcε receptor) [129], and macrophage Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) [130].
TLRs, the mammalian orthologs of the Drosophila immune receptor Toll, are important PRRs of mammalian cells that can be targeted by plant lectins. In vertebrates, 13 TRLs with different immune functions have been identified [131]. For example, cell-surface TLRs, including TLR1, 2, 4–6, and 10, recognize microbial PAMPs such as lipoproteins, lipids, and other microbial membrane fractions, while the endosomal TLRs, i.e., TLR3, 7–9, have been suggested to recognize the invading nucleotides from viruses and bacteria [131]. Next to ArtinM, plant lectins such as Con A, WGA and PHA-L have been shown to target TLRs and, in addition, to enhance TLR expression [132,133]. Similarly, the Korean mistletoe lectin (KML-C), phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and its isoforms, SBA (soybean agglutinin), PNA (peanut agglutinin), etc., were found to stimulate TLRs [132]. For example, the expression of a series of TLRs (TLR2–9) in murine peritoneal macrophages was enhanced through the JNK pathway after treatment with the plant lectin Con A [132,134,135]. These TLRs are heterodimerized, which clearly improved host-cell sensitivity to PAMP stimuli such as LPS [132,135]. In addition, Con A induced humoral immunity through activation of the TLR-NF-κB pathway [131]. Some chimeric lectins have been shown to stimulate complex cellular responses. For example, the European mistletoe lectin (ML) is composed of two chains, A and B. The A chain is responsible for inactivation of the ribosome, causing cell toxicity. The B chain is able to bind the cellular surface through glycan binding, and the B chain alone is sufficient to stimulate the immune response [136].

5.1.2. Plant Lectins Enhance Phagocytosis

Plant lectins can promote cellular responses. pCramoll is the seed lectin from Cratylia mollis, and co-incubation with mice peritoneal exudate cells increased the cellular phagocytosis of the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus by 27% [137]. In addition, pCramoll also increased the mouse macrophages’ ability to phagocytose the pathogen Cryptococcus gattii [138]. In the presence of garlic lectin (ASA I and ASA II), the macrophages increased their phagocytosis of yeast by about 80% [139]. Neutrophiles are another important component of the mammalian cellular defense. ArtinM was shown to stimulate immune neutrophil phagocytosis. ArtinM-treated human neutrophils displayed increased phagocytosis of both fluorescently labeled synthetic zymosan and the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, which was accompanied by an increased lysosome volume [127]. Many more plant lectins have been reported to activate neutrophils and lead to cellular defense (reviewed by [140]).

5.1.3. Plant Lectins Promote the Release of Cytokines and Other Effectors

Plant lectins can induce the expression of humoral effectors against tumors or microbial infections [136,141,142,143]. Activated macrophages can produce cytokine signal molecules. Cytokines are a group of small molecules that participate in intercellular communication. Once cytokines are bound to the receptors of recipient cells, a series of cellular events, depending on the cell type, will be initiated. Immunomodulatory cytokines constitute a large family, including interferons, interleukins, and tumor necrosis factors (TNF) [144,145]. For a long time, plant lectins have been linked to cytokine release. The lectins stimulate cytokine production in different types of immune-related mammalian cells, such as murine macrophages, spleen cells, dendritic cells, mouse spleen cells, and human dendritic cells, neutrophils, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, etc. [136,142,143].
In a mouse model, Con A treatment upregulated the expression of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-2, 6, 10, 17A, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, up to 100-fold [134]. These increased cytokine levels subsequently activate the release of cytotoxic chemicals, for example the oxidative stress marker NO (nitric oxide), which is toxic towards infectious organisms [134,146]. IL12 upregulation, mediated by ArtinM, was required to protect the mouse host against infection by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis [130]. ArtinM-activated neutrophils produced twice the IL-8 levels compared to the control cells, which was accompanied by a 3-fold increase in superoxide release [127]. The increased ROS production, normally triggered by pathogen infection, after treatment with the plant lectin pCramoll was shown to facilitate the elimination of pathogens such as Cryptococcus gattii [147].

5.2. Plant Lectins as a Tool to Study Insect Immune Responses

In insects, the modulation of the immune responses by exogenously applied plant lectins is not well elucidated, and only a few studies have indicated their immunomodulatory effects. For example, feeding D. melanogaster with phytohemagglutinin (PHA), a lectin from the seeds of the red kidney bean P. vulgaris, induced the expression of AMPs such as attactin-A, defensin, and drosomycin, along with a drastic upregulation of the phagocytosis proteins Draper and integrin βν [148]. In addition, a transcriptome analysis in D. melanogaster showed that feeding on a WGA-mixed diet increased the transcription levels of some immune-related peptidases and downregulated some lysozymes, similarly to the effects observed after viral infection [149].
While the plant-lectin-induced insect immune responses are far from being clear, plant lectins can still be useful tools to investigate insect innate immunity. First of all, in mammalian systems, plant lectins have been analyzed in more detail for their immunomodulatory effects, especially regarding receptors on the cell membrane and in the cytosol, in both the cellular and humoral immune responses [136,141,142,143]. In addition, the signaling pathways behind these responses have been extensively studied in vertebrate models [131]. This knowledge can inspire the identification of orthologs in insects. Second, a huge number of plant lectins have been identified and their basic characteristics are elucidated [150], offering a ready-to-use option to study insect immune responses. Many plant lectins participate in plant host immunity by recognizing different pathogen derivatives such as bacterial and fungal exopolysaccharides (reviewed by [151]) and metabolites [152]. Some interesting features of plant lectins can help researchers to generate a working hypothesis related to the functions of insect lectins in the immune response. For example, the lectin domain of Arabidopsis LecRKs (lectin receptor kinase) lacks the critical motif for carbohydrate binding; however, LecRK can activate the calcium response, kinase activation, and downstream gene expression, through lectin-domain binding to eATP (extracellular ATP) [153] and eNAD+ [154], which are important extracellular signals in immunity of both plants (reviewed by [155]) and animals (reviewed by [156]). A recent study also indicated that carbohydrate binding is not necessary for plant-lectin-induced insect cellular immunity [157]. These findings suggest that immune functions of lectins can be achieved independent of carbohydrate-binding ability, which is rarely reported in insects. Third, elucidating the immunomodulatory effects of plant lectins in insects can help to understand the naturally occurring plant–insect interactions, which may be useful in protecting beneficial insects and in the development of new pest control strategies.

Author Contributions

P.C. and K.D.S. were involved in the original draft preparation. E.J.M.V.D., G.S. and K.D.S. were involved in discussion and manuscript corrections. All authors contributed to manuscript and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

P.C. is the recipient of a doctoral grant provided by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC, China). This research was also funded by the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen, Belgium) and the Special Research Fund of the Ghent University (Belgium).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peumans, W.J.; Van Damme, E.J.M. Lectins as plant defense proteins. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharon, N.; Lis, H. Lectins: Cell-agglutinating and sugar-specific proteins. Science 1972, 177, 949–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Esch, L.; Schaffrath, U. An update on jacalin-like lectins and their role in plant defense. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mukherjee, S.; Zheng, H.; Derebe, M.G.; Callenberg, K.M.; Partch, C.L.; Rollins, D.; Propheter, D.C.; Rizo, J.; Grabe, M.; Jiang, Q.-X. Antibacterial membrane attack by a pore-forming intestinal C-type lectin. Nature 2014, 505, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hartmann, M.; Lindhorst, T.K. The bacterial lectin FimH, a target for drug discovery–carbohydrate inhibitors of type 1 fimbriae-mediated bacterial adhesion. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011, 3583–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Caramelo, J.J.; Parodi, A.J. Getting in and out from calnexin/calreticulin cycles. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 10221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cha, S.-K.; Ortega, B.; Kurosu, H.; Rosenblatt, K.P.; Kuro-o, M.; Huang, C.-L. Removal of sialic acid involving Klotho causes cell-surface retention of TRPV5 channel via binding to galectin-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9805–9810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. De Schutter, K.; Van Damme, E.J.M. Protein-carbohydrate interactions as part of plant defense and animal immunity. Molecules 2015, 20, 9029–9053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Xia, X.; You, M.; Rao, X.-J.; Yu, X.-Q. Insect C-type lectins in innate immunity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 83, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Blow, F.; Douglas, A.E. The hemolymph microbiome of insects. J. Insect Physiol. 2019, 115, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Sattler, S. The role of the immune system beyond the fight against infection. Immunol. Cardiovasc. Homeost. Pathol. 2017, 1003, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ali Mohammadie Kojour, M.; Han, Y.S.; Jo, Y.H. An overview of insect innate immunity. Entomol. Res. 2020, 50, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hillyer, J.F. Insect immunology and hematopoiesis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 58, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Strand, M.R. The insect cellular immune response. Insect Sci. 2008, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Müller, U.; Vogel, P.; Alber, G.; Schaub, G.A. The innate immune system of mammals and insects. Trends Innate Immun. 2008, 15, 21–44. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vlisidou, I.; Wood, W. Drosophila blood cells and their role in immune responses. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 1368–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Benoit, J.B.; Vigneron, A.; Broderick, N.A.; Wu, Y.; Sun, J.S.; Carlson, J.R.; Aksoy, S.; Weiss, B.L. Symbiont-induced odorant binding proteins mediate insect host hematopoiesis. eLife 2017, 6, e19535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Taylor, M.E.; Drickamer, K.; Schnaar, R.L. Discovery and Classification of Glycan-Binding Proteins. In Essentials of GlycoBiology, 3rd ed.; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Chapter 28. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nagae, M.; Yamaguchi, Y. Structural aspects of carbohydrate recognition mechanisms of C-type lectins. C-Type Lectins Immune Homeost. 2019, 147–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dodd, R.B.; Drickamer, K. Lectin-like proteins in model organisms: Implications for evolution of carbohydrate-binding activity. Glycobiology 2001, 11, 71R–79R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lu, Y.; Su, F.; Zhu, K.; Zhu, M.; Li, Q.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, R.; Yu, X.-Q. Comparative genomic analysis of C-type lectin-domain genes in seven holometabolous insect species. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 126, 103451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cummings, R.D.; McEver, R.P. C-Type Lectins In: Varki, A. Essentials Glycobiol. 2017, 4, 435–452. [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin, S.-Y.; Hu, D.; Matsumoto, K.; Takeda, K.; Matsumoto, N.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Yamamoto, K. Malectin forms a complex with ribophorin I for enhanced association with misfolded glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 38080–38089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Braakman, I.; Hebert, D.N. Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a013201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, M.Q.; Wang, B.J.; Liu, M.; Jiang, K.Y.; Wang, L. The first identification of a malectin gene (CfMal) in scallop Chlamys farreri: Sequence features and expression profiles. Invertebr. Surviv. J. 2019, 16, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sellaththurai, S.; Shanaka, K.; Liyanage, D.S.; Yang, H.; Priyathilaka, T.T.; Lee, J. Molecular and functional insights into a novel teleost malectin from big-belly seahorse Hippocampus Abdominalis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 99, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schallus, T.; Jaeckh, C.; Fehér, K.; Palma, A.S.; Liu, Y.; Simpson, J.C.; Mackeen, M.; Stier, G.; Gibson, T.J.; Feizi, T. Malectin: A novel carbohydrate-binding protein of the endoplasmic reticulum and a candidate player in the early steps of protein N-glycosylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 3404–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Palma, A.S.; Liu, Y.; Muhle-Goll, C.; Butters, T.D.; Zhang, Y.; Childs, R.; Chai, W.; Feizi, T. Multifaceted approaches including neoglycolipid oligosaccharide microarrays to ligand discovery for malectin. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 478, 265–286. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, S.-R.; Lee, K.-S.; Kim, I.; Kang, S.-W.; Nho, S.-K.; Sohn, H.-D.; Jin, B.-R. Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding putative calreticulin from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Int. J. Ind. Entomol. 2003, 6, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, K.R.; Kim, S.-W.; Kim, Y.K.; Kwon, K.; Choi, J.-S.; Yu, K.; Kwon, O.-Y. Silkworm hemolymph down-regulates the expression of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones under radiation-irradiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 4456–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rosenbaum, E.E.; Hardie, R.C.; Colley, N.J. Calnexin is essential for rhodopsin maturation, Ca2+ regulation, and photoreceptor cell survival. Neuron 2006, 49, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Xiao, X.; Chen, C.; Yu, T.-M.; Ou, J.; Rui, M.; Zhai, Y.; He, Y.; Xue, L.; Ho, M.S. Molecular chaperone calnexin regulates the function of Drosophila sodium channel paralytic. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Mahajan, S.; Ramya, T.N.C. Nature-inspired engineering of an F-type lectin for increased binding strength. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 933–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bishnoi, R.; Khatri, I.; Subramanian, S.; Ramya, T.N.C. Prevalence of the F-type lectin domain. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 888–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Odom-Crespo, E.W. F-Type Lectins: Biochemical, Genetic, and Topological Characterization of a Novel Lectin Family in Lower Vertebrates. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vasta, G.R.; Amzel, L.M.; Bianchet, M.A.; Cammarata, M.; Feng, C.; Saito, K. F-type lectins: A highly diversified family of fucose-binding proteins with a unique sequence motif and structural fold, involved in self/non-self-recognition. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chin, M.-L.; Mlodzik, M. The Drosophila selectin furrowed mediates intercellular planar cell polarity interactions via frizzled stabilization. Dev. Cell 2013, 26, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Kucerova, L.; Broz, V.; Arefin, B.; Maaroufi, H.O.; Hurychova, J.; Strnad, H.; Zurovec, M.; Theopold, U. The Drosophila chitinase-like protein IDGF3 is involved in protection against nematodes and in wound healing. J. Innate Immun. 2016, 8, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Broz, V.; Kucerova, L.; Rouhova, L.; Fleischmannova, J.; Strnad, H.; Bryant, P.J.; Zurovec, M. Drosophila imaginal disc growth factor 2 is a trophic factor involved in energy balance, detoxification, and innate immunity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ganbaatar, O.; Cao, B.; Zhang, Y.; Bao, D.; Bao, W.; Wuriyanghan, H. Knockdown of Mythimna separata chitinase genes via bacterial expression and oral delivery of RNAi effectors. BMC Biotechnol. 2017, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nakabachi, A.; Shigenobu, S.; Miyagishima, S. Chitinase-like proteins encoded in the genome of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2010, 19, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xi, Y.; Pan, P.; Ye, Y.; Yu, B.; Xu, H.; Zhang, C. Chitinase-like gene family in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Insect Mol. Biol. 2015, 24, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, Q.; Arakane, Y.; Banerjee, D.; Beeman, R.W.; Kramer, K.J.; Muthukrishnan, S. Domain organization and phylogenetic analysis of the chitinase-like family of proteins in three species of insects. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, T.; Guo, X.; Bu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Duan, Y.; Yang, Q. Structural and biochemical insights into an insect gut-specific chitinase with antifungal activity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 119, 103326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, T.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, X.; Duan, Y.; Yang, Q. Structure, catalysis, and inhibition of OfChi-h, the Lepidoptera-exclusive insect chitinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 2080–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Tian, Y.; Chen, T.; Huang, W.; Luo, P.; Huo, D.; Yun, L.; Hu, C.; Cai, Y. A new L-type lectin (LvLTLC1) from the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei facilitates the clearance of Vibrio harveyi. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 73, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Satoh, T.; Kato, K. Recombinant expression and purification of animal intracellular L-type lectins. In Lectin Purification and Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  48. Appenzeller, C.; Andersson, H.; Kappeler, F.; Hauri, H.-P. The lectin ERGIC-53 is a cargo transport receptor for glycoproteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brown, N.H.; Gregory, S.L.; Rickoll, W.L.; Fessler, L.I.; Prout, M.; White, R.A.H.; Fristrom, J.W. Talin is essential for integrin function in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 2002, 3, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mao, T.; Cheng, X.; Fang, Y.; Li, M.; Lu, Z.; Qu, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Li, F.; Li, B. Induction of ER stress, antioxidant and detoxification response by sublethal doses of chlorantraniliprole in the silk gland of silkworm, Bombyx mori. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 170, 104685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Díaz-Alvarez, L.; Ortega, E. The many roles of galectin-3, a multifaceted molecule, in innate immune responses against pathogens. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 9247574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Francischetti, I.M.B.; Ma, D.; Andersen, J.F.; Ribeiro, J.M.C. Evidence for a lectin specific for sulfated glycans in the salivary gland of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Cerliani, J.P.; Stowell, S.R.; Mascanfroni, I.D.; Arthur, C.M.; Cummings, R.D.; Rabinovich, G.A. Expanding the universe of cytokines and pattern recognition receptors: Galectins and glycans in innate immunity. J. Clin. Immunol. 2011, 31, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cummings, R.D.; Liu, F.T.; Vasta, G.R. Galectins. In Essentials of Glycobiology, 3rd ed.; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Chapter 36. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rabinovich, G.A.; Van Kooyk, Y.; Cobb, B.A. Glycobiology of immune responses. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1253, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chiu, Y.-P.; Sun, Y.-C.; Qiu, D.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Kuo, J.-C.; Huang, J. Liquid-liquid phase separation and extracellular multivalent interactions in the tale of galectin-3. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, L.-L.; Hu, X.-H.; Wu, S.-Q.; Batool, K.; Chowdhury, M.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gill, S.S.; Guan, X.; Yu, X.-Q. Aedes aegypti galectin competes with Cry11Aa for binding to ALP1 to modulate Cry toxicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 13435–13443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hu, X.; Chen, H.; Xu, J.; Zhao, G.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Batool, K.; Wu, C.; Wu, S.; Huang, E. Function of Aedes aegypti galectin-6 in modulation of Cry11Aa toxicity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 162, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pace, K.E.; Baum, L.G. Insect galectins: Roles in immunity and development. Glycoconj. J. 2002, 19, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pace, K.E.; Lebestky, T.; Hummel, T.; Arnoux, P.; Kwan, K.; Baum, L.G. Characterization of a novel Drosophila melanogaster galectin: Expression in developing immune, neural, and muscle tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 13091–13098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kamhawi, S.; Ramalho-Ortigao, M.; Pham, V.M.; Kumar, S.; Lawyer, P.G.; Turco, S.J.; Barillas-Mury, C.; Sacks, D.L.; Valenzuela, J.G. A role for insect galectins in parasite survival. Cell 2004, 119, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jung, J.; Sajjadian, S.M.; Kim, Y. Hemolin, an immunoglobulin-like peptide, opsonizes nonself targets for phagocytosis and encapsulation in Spodoptera exigua, a lepidopteran insect. J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 2019, 22, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Eleftherianos, I.; Gökçen, F.; Felföldi, G.; Millichap, P.J.; Trenczek, T.E.; Ffrench-Constant, R.H.; Reynolds, S.E. The immunoglobulin family protein Hemolin mediates cellular immune responses to bacteria in the insect Manduca sexta. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Su, X.-D.; Gastinel, L.N.; Vaughn, D.E.; Faye, I.; Poon, P.; Bjorkman, P.J. Crystal structure of hemolin: A horseshoe shape with implications for homophilic adhesion. Science 1998, 281, 991–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cummings, R.D.L.; Schnaar, R. R-Type Lectins. In Essentials of Glycobiology, 3rd ed.; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Chapter 31. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hagen, F.K.; Nehrke, K. cDNA Cloning and expression of a family of UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine: Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase sequence homologs from Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 8268–8277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Adelman, Z.N.; Myles, K.M. The C-type lectin domain gene family in Aedes aegypti and their role in arbovirus infection. Viruses 2018, 10, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Batool, K.; Alam, I.; Zhao, G.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Yu, X.; Huang, E.; Guan, X.; Zhang, L. C-Type lectin-20 interacts with ALP1 receptor to reduce cry toxicity in Aedes aegypti. Toxins 2018, 10, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Liu, K.; Qian, Y.; Jung, Y.-S.; Zhou, B.; Cao, R.; Shen, T.; Shao, D.; Wei, J.; Ma, Z.; Chen, P. mosGCTL-7, a C-type lectin protein, mediates Japanese encephalitis virus infection in mosquitoes. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01348-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Bi, J.; Feng, F.; Li, J.; Mao, J.; Ning, M.; Song, X.; Xie, J.; Tang, J.; Li, B. AC-type lectin with a single carbohydrate-recognition domain involved in the innate immune response of Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2019, 28, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bi, J.; Ning, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Wang, L.; Xu, S.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, Q.; Li, B. AC-type lectin with dual-CRD from Tribolium castaneum is induced in response to bacterial challenge. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3965–3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ishihara, T.; Maruyama, Y.; Furukawa, S. Gene expression and molecular characterization of a novel C-type lectin, encapsulation promoting lectin (EPL), in the rice armyworm, Mythimna separata. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 89, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shen, D.; Wang, L.; Ji, J.; Liu, Q.; An, C. Identification and characterization of C-type lectins in Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Insect Sci. 2018, 18, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gasmi, L.; Jakubowska, A.K.; Ferré, J.; Ogliastro, M.; Herrero, S. Characterization of two groups of Spodoptera exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) C-type lectins and insights into their role in defense against the densovirus JcDV. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2018, 97, e21432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Meng, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, G.; Ni, R.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, Q.; Zou, Z. Comparative analysis of C-type lectin domain proteins in the ghost moth, Thitarodes xiaojinensis (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, W.; Wang, G.; Zhuo, X.; Liu, Y.; Tang, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. C-type lectin-mediated microbial homeostasis is critical for Helicoverpa armigera larval growth and development. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zuber, R.; Shaik, K.S.; Meyer, F.; Ho, H.-N.; Speidel, A.; Gehring, N.; Bartoszewski, S.; Schwarz, H.; Moussian, B. The putative C-type lectin Schlaff ensures epidermal barrier compactness in Drosophila. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ao, J.; Ling, E.; Yu, X.Q. Drosophila C-type lectins enhance cellular encapsulation. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 2541–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Arakane, Y.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Kramer, K.J.; Ma, E.; Zhu, K.Y. Comparative genomic analysis of chitinase and chitinase-like genes in the African malaria mosquito (Anopheles gambiae). PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Pan, Y.; Chen, K.; Xia, H.; Yao, Q.; Gao, L.; Lü, P.; He, Y.; Wang, L. Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of BmIDGF gene from Bombyx mori. Z. Naturforsch. C 2010, 65, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pan, Y.; Lü, P.; Wang, Y.; Yin, L.; Ma, H.; Ma, G.; Chen, K.; He, Y. In silico identification of novel chitinase-like proteins in the silkworm, Bombyx mori, genome. J. Insect Sci. 2012, 12, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Pesch, Y.-Y.; Riedel, D.; Patil, K.R.; Loch, G.; Behr, M. Chitinases and Imaginal disc growth factors organize the extracellular matrix formation at barrier tissues in insects. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Arakane, Y.; Muthukrishnan, S. Insect chitinase and chitinase-like proteins. Cell. Mol. life Sci. 2010, 67, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liao, Z.H.; Kuo, T.C.; Kao, C.H.; Chou, T.M.; Kao, Y.H.; Huang, R.N. Identification of the chitinase genes from the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2016, 106, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tetreau, G.; Cao, X.; Chen, Y.-R.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Jiang, H.; Blissard, G.W.; Kanost, M.R.; Wang, P. Overview of chitin metabolism enzymes in Manduca sexta: Identification, domain organization, phylogenetic analysis and gene expression. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 62, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Peng, Z.; Ren, J.; Su, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Tian, L.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Liang, P.; Xie, W.; Zhang, Y. Genome-wide identification and analysis of chitinase-like gene family in Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Insects 2021, 12, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sackton, T.B.; Lazzaro, B.P.; Clark, A.G. Rapid expansion of immune-related gene families in the house fly, Musca domestica. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 857–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Waldock, J.; Olson, K.E.; Christophides, G.K. Anopheles gambiae antiviral immune response to systemic O’nyong-nyong infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rao, X.-J.; Wu, P.; Shahzad, T.; Liu, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, Y.-F.; Shi, Q.; Yu, X.-Q. Characterization of a dual-CRD galectin in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 60, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Imai, S.; Kusakabe, T.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Shirai, S.; Mon, H.; Morokuma, D.; Lee, J.M. Roles of silkworm endoplasmic reticulum chaperones in the secretion of recombinant proteins expressed by baculovirus system. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2015, 409, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wojda, I.; Cytryńska, M.; Zdybicka-Barabas, A.; Kordaczuk, J. Insect Defense Proteins and Peptides. Vertebr. Invertebr. Respir. Proteins Lipoproteins Other Body Fluid Proteins 2020, 81–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Orozco-Flores, A.A.; Valadez-Lira, J.A.; Oppert, B.; Gomez-Flores, R.; Tamez-Guerra, R.; Rodríguez-Padilla, C.; Tamez-Guerra, P. Regulation by gut bacteria of immune response, Bacillus thuringiensis susceptibility and hemolin expression in Plodia interpunctella. J. Insect Physiol. 2017, 98, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Aathmanathan, V.S.; Jothi, N.; Prajapati, V.K.; Krishnan, M. Investigation of immunogenic properties of Hemolin from silkworm, Bombyx mori as carrier protein: An immunoinformatic approach. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Qian, C.; Wang, F.; Zhu, B.; Wang, L.; Wei, G.; Sun, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, C. Identification of a hemolin protein from Actias selene mediates immune response to pathogens. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 42, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sun, Y.; Dai, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.; Qian, C.; Wei, G.; Zhu, B.-J.; Liu, C.-L. Gene expression patterns in response to pathogen challenge and interaction with hemolin suggest that the Yippee protein of Antheraea pernyi is involved in the innate immune response. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016, 138, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hauri, H.-P.; Appenzeller, C.; Kuhn, F.; Nufer, O. Lectins and traffic in the secretory pathway. FEBS Lett. 2000, 476, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Pedersen, J.W.; Bennett, E.P.; Katrine, T.-B.S.; Meldal, M.; Holmér, A.P.; Blixt, O.; Cló, E.; Levery, S.B.; Clausen, H.; Wandall, H.H. Lectin domains of polypeptide GalNAc transferases exhibit glycopeptide binding specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 32684–32696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Wang, Q.; Ren, M.; Liu, X.; Xia, H.; Chen, K. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins in insect immunity. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 106, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wang, P.; Zhuo, X.-R.; Tang, L.; Liu, X.-S.; Wang, Y.-F.; Wang, G.-X.; Yu, X.-Q.; Wang, J.-L. C-type lectin interacting with β-integrin enhances hemocytic encapsulation in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 86, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ling, E.; Yu, X.Q. Cellular encapsulation and melanization are enhanced by immulectins, pattern recognition receptors from the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006, 30, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lin, Z.; Wang, J.-L.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, J.-X.; Zou, Z. Pattern recognition receptors from lepidopteran insects and their biological functions. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020, 108, 103688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lavine, M.D.; Strand, M.R. Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 1295–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Melcarne, C.; Lemaitre, B.; Kurant, E. Phagocytosis in Drosophila: From molecules and cellular machinery to physiology. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 109, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tian, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.-F.; Wang, J.-X. Characterization of a C-type lectin from the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2009, 33, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nauta, A.J.; Raaschou-Jensen, N.; Roos, A.; Daha, M.R.; Madsen, H.O.; Borrias-Essers, M.C.; Ryder, L.P.; Koch, C.; Garred, P. Mannose-binding lectin engagement with late apoptotic and necrotic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 2853–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, X.-W.; Zhao, X.-F.; Wang, J.-X. C-type lectin binds to β-integrin to promote hemocytic phagocytosis in an invertebrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 2405–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Liu, S.; Zheng, S.-C.; Li, Y.-L.; Li, J.; Liu, H.-P. Hemocyte-mediated phagocytosis in crustaceans. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Rizki, T.M.; Rizki, R.M. Lamellocyte differentiation in Drosophila larvae parasitized by Leptopilina. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 1992, 16, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Fauvarque, M.-O.; Williams, M.J. Drosophila cellular immunity: A story of migration and adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 1373–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Yu, D.-H.; Qu, C.-K.; Henegariu, O.; Lu, X.; Feng, G.-S. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase Shp-2 regulates cell spreading, migration, and focal adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 21125–21131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Cheng, A.; Bal, G.S.; Kennedy, B.P.; Tremblay, M.L. Attenuation of adhesion-dependent signaling and cell spreading in transformed fibroblasts lacking protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 25848–25855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Tsuzuki, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Furihata, S.; Ryuda, M.; Tanaka, H.; Sung, E.J.; Bird, G.S.; Zhou, Y.; Shears, S.B.; Hayakawa, Y. Switching between humoral and cellular immune responses in Drosophila is guided by the cytokine GBP. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Faivre-Sarrailh, C.; Banerjee, S.; Li, J.; Hortsch, M.; Laval, M.; Bhat, M.A. Drosophila contactin, a homolog of vertebrate contactin, is required for septate junction organization and paracellular barrier function. Development 2004, 131, 4931–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Clark, K.D.; Strand, M.R. Hemolymph melanization in the silkmoth Bombyx mori involves formation of a high molecular mass complex that metabolizes tyrosine. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 14476–14487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Tang, H. Regulation and function of the melanization reaction in Drosophila. Fly 2009, 3, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Siva-Jothy, M.T.; Thompson, J.J.W. Short-term nutrient deprivation affects immune function. Physiol. Entomol. 2002, 27, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shu, M.; Mang, D.; Fu, G.S.; Tanaka, S.; Endo, H.; Kikuta, S.; Sato, R. Mechanisms of nodule-specific melanization in the hemocoel of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 70, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Imler, J.-L.; Bulet, P. Antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila: Structures, activities and gene regulation. Mech. Epithel. Def. 2005, 86, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hanson, M.A.; Lemaitre, B. New insights on Drosophila antimicrobial peptide function in host defense and beyond. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2020, 62, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Parvy, J.-P.; Yu, Y.; Dostalova, A.; Kondo, S.; Kurjan, A.; Bulet, P.; Lemaitre, B.; Vidal, M.; Cordero, J.B. The antimicrobial peptide defensin cooperates with tumour necrosis factor to drive tumour cell death in Drosophila. eLife 2019, 8, e45061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yakovlev, A.Y.; Nesin, A.P.; Simonenko, N.P.; Gordya, N.A.; Tulin, D.V.; Kruglikova, A.A.; Chernysh, S.I. Fat body and hemocyte contribution to the antimicrobial peptide synthesis in Calliphora vicina R.-D. (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2017, 53, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kallio, J.; Leinonen, A.; Ulvila, J.; Valanne, S.; Ezekowitz, R.A.; Rämet, M. Functional analysis of immune response genes in Drosophila identifies JNK pathway as a regulator of antimicrobial peptide gene expression in S2 cells. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Tanji, T.; Shiraishi, H.; Natori, S.; Ohashi-Kobayashi, A. Differential activation of the lectin and antimicrobial peptide genes in Sarcophaga peregrina (the flesh fly). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2008, 69, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Pang, X.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Liu, Q.; Wang, P.; Cheng, G. Mosquito C-type lectins maintain gut microbiome homeostasis. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Cheng, G.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Xiao, X. Mosquito defense strategies against viral infection. Trends Parasitol. 2016, 32, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Pereira-da-Silva, G.; Moreno, A.N.; Marques, F.; Oliver, C.; Jamur, M.C.; Panunto-Castelo, A.; Roque-Barreira, M.C. Neutrophil activation induced by the lectin KM+ involves binding to CXCR2. Biochim. Biophys. Acta General Subj. 2006, 1760, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Toledo, K.A.; Scwartz, C.; Oliveira, A.F.; Conrado, M.C.A.V.; Bernardes, E.S.; Fernandes, L.C.; Roque-Barreira, M.C.; Pereira-da-Silva, G.; Moreno, A.N. Neutrophil activation induced by ArtinM: Release of inflammatory mediators and enhancement of effector functions. Immunol. Lett. 2009, 123, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ganiko, L.; Martins, A.R.; Freymüller, E.; Mortara, R.A.; Roque-Barreira, M.-C. Lectin KM+-induced neutrophil haptotaxis involves binding to laminin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta General Subj. 2005, 1721, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Moreno, A.N.; Jamur, M.C.; Oliver, C.; Roque-Barreira, M.C. Mast cell degranulation induced by lectins: Effect on neutrophil recruitment. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2003, 132, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Coltri, K.C.; Oliveira, L.L.; Pinzan, C.F.; Vendruscolo, P.E.; Martinez, R.; Goldman, M.H.; Panunto-Castelo, A.; Roque-Barreira, M.-C. Therapeutic administration of KM+ lectin protects mice against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis infection via interleukin-12 production in a toll-like receptor 2-dependent mechanism. Am. J. Pathol. 2008, 173, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Roudaire, T.; Héloir, M.-C.; Wendehenne, D.; Zadoroznyj, A.; Dubrez, L.; Poinssot, B. Cross kingdom immunity: The role of immune receptors and downstream signaling in animal and plant cell death. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Da Silva, L.C.N.; Correia, M.T.D.S. Plant lectins and Toll-like receptors: Implications for therapy of microbial infections. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Ricci-Azevedo, R.; Roque-Barreira, M.-C.; Gay, N.J. Targeting and recognition of toll-like receptors by plant and pathogen lectins. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Pang, Q.; Jin, H.; Ke, X.; Man, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Lu, Z.; Liu, H. The role of serotonin in Concanavalin A-induced liver injury in mice. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 7504521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sodhi, A.; Tarang, S.; Kesherwani, V. Concanavalin A induced expression of Toll-like receptors in murine peritoneal macrophages in vitro. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Souza, M.A.; Carvalho, F.C.; Ruas, L.P.; Ricci-Azevedo, R.; Roque-Barreira, M.C. The immunomodulatory effect of plant lectins: A review with emphasis on ArtinM properties. Glycoconj. J. 2013, 30, 641–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. da Silva, L.C.N.; Alves, N.M.P.; de Castro, M.C.A.B.; Pereira, V.R.A.; da Paz, N.V.N.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; de Figueiredo, R.C.B.Q.; dos Santos Correia, M.T. Immunomodulatory effects of pCramoll and rCramoll on peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) infected and non-infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Jandú, J.J.; Costa, M.C.; Santos, J.R.A.; Andrade, F.M.; Magalhães, T.F.; Silva, M.V.; Castro, M.C.A.B.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Gomes, A.G.; Paixão, T.A. Treatment with pCramoll alone and in combination with fluconazole provides therapeutic benefits in C. gattii infected mice. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Clement, F.; Venkatesh, Y.P. Dietary garlic (Allium sativum) lectins, ASA I and ASA II, are highly stable and immunogenic. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Pereira-da-Silva, G.; Caroline Carvalho, F.; Cristina Roque-Barreira, M. Neutrophil activation induced by plant lectins: Modulation of inflammatory processes. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets Former. Curr. Drug Targets Inflamm. Allergy 2012, 11, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Oliveira Brito, P.K.M.; Gonçalves, T.E.; Fernandes, F.F.; Miguel, C.B.; Rodrigues, W.F.; Lazo Chica, J.E.; Roque-Barreira, M.C.; da Silva, T.A. Systemic effects in naïve mice injected with immunomodulatory lectin ArtinM. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Coriolano, M.C.; de Santana Brito, J.; de Siqueira Patriota, L.L.; de Araujo Soares, A.K.; de Lorena, V.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Napoleao, T.H.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; de Melo, C.M.L. Immunomodulatory effects of the water-soluble lectin from Moringa oleifera seeds (WSMoL) on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Protein Pept. Lett. 2018, 25, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Dos Santos, A.J.C.A.; da Silva Barros, B.R.; de Souza Aguiar, L.M.; de Siqueira Patriota, L.L.; de Albuquerque Lima, T.; Zingali, R.B.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Napoleão, T.H.; de Melo, C.M.L.; Pontual, E.V. Schinus terebinthifolia leaf lectin (SteLL) is an immunomodulatory agent by altering cytokine release by mice splenocytes. Biotech 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Fajgenbaum, D.C.; June, C.H. Cytokine storm. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2255–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tisoncik, J.R.; Korth, M.J.; Simmons, C.P.; Farrar, J.; Martin, T.R.; Katze, M.G. Into the eye of the cytokine storm. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Coleman, J.W. Nitric oxide in immunity and inflammation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2001, 1, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jandú, J.J.B.; Moraes Neto, R.N.; Zagmignan, A.; de Sousa, E.M.; Brelaz-de-Castro, M.C.A.; dos Santos Correia, M.T.; da Silva, L.C.N. Targeting the immune system with plant lectins to combat microbial infections. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Ekowati, H.; Arai, J.; Putri, A.S.D.; Nainu, F.; Shiratsuchi, A.; Nakanishi, Y. Protective effects of Phaseolus vulgaris lectin against viral infection in Drosophila. Drug Discov. Ther. 2017, 11, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Li, H.-M.; Sun, L.; Mittapalli, O.; Muir, W.M.; Xie, J.; Wu, J.; Schemerhorn, B.J.; Sun, W.; Pittendrigh, B.R.; Murdock, L.L. Transcriptional signatures in response to wheat germ agglutinin and starvation in Drosophila melanogaster larval midgut. Insect Mol. Biol. 2009, 18, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tsaneva, M.; Van Damme, E.J.M. 130 years of plant lectin research. Glycoconj. J. 2020, 37, 533–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Van Holle, S.; Van Damme, E.J.M. Signaling through plant lectins: Modulation of plant immunity and beyond. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018, 46, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Kutschera, A.; Dawid, C.; Gisch, N.; Schmid, C.; Raasch, L.; Gerster, T.; Schäffer, M.; Smakowska-Luzan, E.; Belkhadir, Y.; Corina Vlot, A.; et al. Bacterial medium-chain 3-hydroxy fatty acid metabolites trigger immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Science 2019, 364, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  153. Choi, J.; Tanaka, K.; Cao, Y.; Qi, Y.; Qiu, J.; Liang, Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Stacey, G. Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP. Science 2014, 343, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wang, C.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, X.; Yao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Mou, Z. A lectin receptor kinase as a potential sensor for extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 2017, 6, e25474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Gust, A.A.; Pruitt, R.; Nürnberger, T. Sensing danger: Key to activating plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Trautmann, A. Extracellular ATP in the immune system: More than just a “danger signal”. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, pe6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Chen, P.; De Schutter, K.; Pauwels, J.; Gevaert, K.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Smagghe, G. The lectin Orysata induces phosphatase-mediated and carbohydrate-independent aggregation of insect cells. J. Insect Physiol. 2021, 131, 104241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 12 00497 g001 550
Figure 1. Immunomodulatory effects of plant lectins.
Figure 1. Immunomodulatory effects of plant lectins.
Insects 12 00497 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, P.; De Schutter, K.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Smagghe, G. Can Plant Lectins Help to Elucidate Insect Lectin-Mediated Immune Response? Insects 2021, 12, 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060497

AMA Style

Chen P, De Schutter K, Van Damme EJM, Smagghe G. Can Plant Lectins Help to Elucidate Insect Lectin-Mediated Immune Response? Insects. 2021; 12(6):497. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060497

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Pengyu, Kristof De Schutter, Els J. M. Van Damme, and Guy Smagghe. 2021. "Can Plant Lectins Help to Elucidate Insect Lectin-Mediated Immune Response?" Insects 12, no. 6: 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060497

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop