Host Preference of Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Among Fruits of Solanaceous Plants
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Insect Preparation
2.2. Host Fruit Preparation
2.2.1. No-Choice Experiment
2.2.2. Choice Experiment
2.3. Fruit Characteristics
2.4. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Host Preference of Bactrocera Latifrons on Unripe Solanaceous Fruits in a No-Choice Experiment
3.2. Host Preference of Bactrocera Latifrons on Ripe Solanaceous Fruits in a No-Choice Experiment
3.3. Host Preference of Bactrocera Latifrons on Solanaceous Fruits in a Choice Experiment
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- White, I.M.; Elson-Harris, M.M. Fruit Flies of Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics; C.A.B. International in association with ACIAR: Wallingford, UK, 1992; pp. 202–223. [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher, B.S.; Prokopy, R.J. Host location and oviposition in tephritid fruit flies. In Reproductive Behaviour of Insects: Individuals and Populations; Bailey, W.J., Ridsdill-Smith, J., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: Melbourne, Australia, 1991; pp. 139–171. [Google Scholar]
- Fitt, G.P. The influence of a shortage of hosts on the specificity of oviposition behaviour in species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Physiol. Entomol. 1986, 11, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, A.R.; Allwood, A.; Chinajariyawong, A.; Drew, R.A.I.; Hengsawad, C.; Jirasurat, M.; Kongkrong, C.; Kritsaneepaiboon, S.; Vijaysegaran, S. Seasonal abundance and host use patterns of seven Bactrocera macquart species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2001, 49, 207–220. [Google Scholar]
- Clarke, A.R.; Armstrong, K.F.; Carmichael, A.E.; Milne, J.R.; Raghu, S.; Roderick, G.K.; Yeates, D.K. Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005, 50, 293–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tan, K.-H.; Serit, M. Adult population dynamics of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to host phenology and weather in two villages of Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ. Entomol. 1994, 23, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zida, I.; Nacro, S.; Dabire, R.; Moquet, L.; Delatte, H.; Somda, I. Host range and species diversity of tephritidae of three plant formations in Western Burkina Faso. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McQuate, G.T.; Jang, E.B.; Siderhurst, M. Detection/monitoring of Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae): Assessing the potential of prospective new lures. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 2013, 45, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
- Takano, S.I. Survival of Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults under constant and fluctuating low temperatures. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2014, 49, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McQuate, G.T.; Liquido, N.J. Annotated world bibliography of host fruits of Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insecta Mundi 2013, 289, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
- Vijaysegaran, S.; Osman, M.S. Fruit flies in peninsular malaysia: Their economic importance and control strategies. In Biology and Control of Fruit Flies; Kawasaki, K., Iwahashi, K.O., Kaneshiro, K., Eds.; Ginowan: Okinawa, Japan, 2007; pp. 105–115. [Google Scholar]
- Boopathi, T.; Singh, S.B.; Manju, T.; Chowdhury, S.; Singh, A.R.; Dutta, S.K.; Dayal, V.; Behere, G.T.; Ngachan, S.V.; Hazarika, S.; et al. First report of economic injury to tomato due to Zeugodacus tau (Diptera: Tephritidae): Relative abundance and effects of cultivar and season on injury. Fla. Entomol. 2017, 100, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mziray, H.A.; Makundi, R.H.; Mwatawala, M.; Maerere, A.; De Meyer, M. Host use of Bactrocera latifrons, a new invasive tephritid species in Tanzania. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liquido, N.J.; Harris, E.J.; Dekker, L.A. Ecology of Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations: Host plants, natural enemies, distribution, and abundance. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1994, 87, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peck, S.L.; McQuate, G.T. Ecological aspects of Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Muai, Hawaii: Movement and host preference. Environ. Entomol. 2004, 33, 1722–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ndayizeye, L.; Nzigidahera, B.; Gesmallah, A.E. Current distribution of Bactrocera latifrons Hendel in the different agro-ecological zones of Burundi. Int. J. Trop. Insect. Sci. 2019, 39, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, E.J.; Liquido, N.J.; Spencer, J.P. Distribution and host utilization of Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae) on the island of Kauai, Hawii. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 2001, 35, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
- Mwatawala, M.W.; De Meyer, M.; White, I.M.; Maerere, A.; Makundi, R.H. Detection of the invasive solanum fruit fly Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Tanzania. J. Appl. Entomol. 2007, 131, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Fleischer, F.; Aluja, M. Clutch size in frugivorous insects as a function of host firmness: The case of the tephritid fly Anastrepha ludens. Ecol. Entomol. 2003, 28, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rattanapun, W.; Amornsak, W.; Clarke, A.R. Bactrocera dorsalis preference for and performance on two mango varieties at three stages of ripeness. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2009, 131, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nufio, C.R.; Papaj, D.R. Superparasitism of larval hosts by the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis, and its implications for female and offspring performance. Oecologia 2004, 141, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennessey, M.K.; Schnell, R.J. Resistance of immature mango fruits to Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 2001, 84, 318–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howe, G.A.; Jander, G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- War, A.R.; Paulraj, M.G.; Ahmad, T.; Buhroo, A.A.; Hussian, B.; Iqnacimuthu, S.; Sharma, H.C. Mechanism of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 79, 1306–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dar, S.A.; Rather, B.A.; Wani, A.R.; Ganie, M.A. Resistance against insect pests by plant phenolics and their derivative compounds. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 2017, 6, 1941–1949. [Google Scholar]
- Spurr, E.B.; McGregor, P.G. Potential invertebrate antifeedants for toxic baits used for vertebrate pest control. Sci. Conserv. 2003, 232, 13. [Google Scholar]
- Tęgowska, E.; Grajpel, B.; Piechowicz, B. Does red pepper contain an insecticidal compound for Colorado beetle? IOBC/WPRS Bull. 2005, 28, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
- Dayan, F.E.; Cantrell, C.L.; Duke, S.O. Natural products in crop protection. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 4022–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Howard, L.R.; Talcott, S.T.; Brenes, C.H.; Villalon, B. Changes in phytochemical and antioxidant activity of selected pepper cultivars (Capsicum species) as influenced by maturity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro-Concha, L.; Baas-Espinola, F.; Ancona-Escalante, W.; Vázquez-Flota, F.; Miranda-Ham, M.L. Phenylalanine biosynthesis and its relationship to accumulation of capsaicinoids during Capsicum chinense fruit development. Biol. Plant 2016, 60, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niño-Medina, G.; Urías-Orona, V.; Muy-Rangel, M.D.; Heredia, J.B. Structure and content of phenolics in eggplant (Solanum melongena)—A review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketsa, S.; Atantee, S. Phenolic, lignin, peroxidase activity and increased firmness of damaged pericarp mangosteen fruit after impact. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1998, 14, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, P.G.; Lego, M.C.; Galetto, W.G. Separation and quantitation of red pepper major heat principles by reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1983, 3, 1326–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, D.B. Hot peppers as a host for the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 2004, 87, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navrozidis, E.I.; Tzanakakis, M.E. Tomato fruits as an alternative host for a laboratory strain of the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae. Phytoparasitica 2005, 33, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balagawi, S.; Vijaysegaran, S.; Drew, R.A.I.; Raghu, S. Influence of fruit traits on oviposition preference and offspring performance of Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on three tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) cultivars. Aust. J. Entomol. 2005, 44, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papaj, D.R.; Alonso-Pimentel, H. Why walnut flies superparasitize: Time savings as a possible explanation. Oecologia 1997, 109, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aluja, M.; Lozada, N.; Pinero, J.; Birke, A.; Hernandez-Ortiz, V.; Diaz-Fleischer, F. Basic behavior of Rhagoletis turpiniae (Diptera: Tephritidae) with comparative notes on the sexual behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella and Rhagoletis zoqui. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2001, 94, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, M.P.; Vashishtha, B.B. Factors influencing infestation of fruit fly (Carpomyiave suviana) in indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2002, 72, 543–547. [Google Scholar]
Plant’s Common Name | No. Pupae/ Gram of Fruit (Pupa) | Total Weight of Pupae/Fruit (g) | Average Weight of One Pupa (g) | Adult Emergence (%) | No. Offspring/Fruit (indiv.) | Sex Ratio Male:Female |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eggplant | 0.09 ± 0.01 c | 0.1740 ± 0.0282 a | 0.0414 ± 0.0103 a | 78.56 ± 6.31 a | 5.00 ± 0.67 a | 3:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 |
turkey berry | 0.70 ± 0.11 b | 0.0071 ± 0.0008 b | 0.0062 ± 0.0031 b | 18.75 ± 13.52 c | 0.33 ± 0.33 c | - |
n | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | - |
banana pepper | 0.88 ± 0.14 b | 0.0306 ± 0.0034 b | 0.0114 ± 0.0008 b | 57.35 ± 6.72 ab | 1.60 ± 0.29 b | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 21 |
cayenne pepper | 1.22 ± 0.28 ab | 0.0629 ± 0.0327 b | 0.0207 ± 0.0075 ab | 71.75 ± 7.48 ab | 1.83 ± 0.46 b | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 19 |
noom pepper | 0.10 ± 0.02 c | 0.0225 ± 0.0040 b | 0.0158 ± 0.0012 ab | 70.04 ± 8.69 ab | 1.13 ± 0.13 bc | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
bird chili | 1.78 ± 0.25 a | 0.0164 ± 0.0023 b | 0.0106 ± 0.0012 b | 62.04 ± 9.60 ab | 0.93 ± 0.12 bc | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 14 |
duey kai chili | 1.22 ± 0.27 ab | 0.0060 ± 0.0006 b | 0.0041 ± 0.0005 b | 41.67 ± 11.56 bc | 0.60 ± 0.16 bc | 2:1 |
n | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Plant’s Common Name | No. Pupae/Gram of Fruit (Pupa) | Total Weight of Pupae/Fruit (g) | Average Weight of One Pupa (g) | Adult Emergence (%) | No. Offspring/Fruit (indiv) | Sex Ratio Male:Female |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eggplant | 0.09 ± 0.01 c | 0.1746 ± 0.0323 a | 0.0258 ± 0.0062 a | 89.48 ± 4.86 a | 6.72 ± 0.90 a | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 |
turkey berry | 1.15 ± 0.51 abc | 0.0208 ± 0.0087 c | 0.0087 ± 0.0013 b | 40.63 ± 10.81 b | 0.85 ± 0.17 c | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
banana pepper | 0.45 ± 0.11 c | 0.0955 ± 0.0182 abc | 0.0177 ± 0.0018 ab | 61.19 ± 11.02 ab | 3.84 ± 1.02 ab | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 16 |
cayenne pepper | 1.02 ± 0.28 abc | 0.0604 ± 0.0090 bc | 0.0159 ± 0.0004 ab | 60.45 ± 13.03 ab | 2.13 ± 0.44 bc | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 16 |
noom pepper | 0.58 ± 0.14 bc | 0.1022 ± 0.0174 ab | 0.0162 ± 0.0013 ab | 65.28 ± 9.11 ab | 4.00 ± 0.54 ab | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 |
bird chili | 3.23 ± 1.00 a | 0.0332 ± 0.0138 bc | 0.0128 ± 0.0040 ab | 90.63 ± 4.38 a | 2.17 ± 0.36 bc | 4:1 |
n | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
duey kai chili | 2.34 ± 0.31 ab | 0.0285 ± 0.0050 bc | 0.0109 ± 0.0015 b | 72.50 ± 12.75 ab | 2.03 ± 0.46 bc | 1:1 |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Plant’s Common Name | No. Pupae/ Gram of Fruit (Pupa) | Total Weight of Pupae/Fruit (g) | Average Weight of One Pupa (g) | Adult Emergence (%) | No. Offspring/Fruit (indiv) | Sex Ratio Male:Female |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eggplant | 0.27± 0.05 abc | 0.3309± 0.0688 a | 0.0164 ± 0.0008 | 73.83 ± 9.63 | 16.00 ± 3.61 a | 1:1 |
n | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 |
turkey berry | 0.00± 0.00 c | - | - | - | - | - |
n | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
banana pepper | 0.80± 0.14 a | 0.0943± 0.0153 b | 0.0141± 0.0006 | 74.95 ± 10.13 | 4.44 ± 0.82 bc | 2:1 |
n | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
cayenne pepper | 0.60± 0.18 ab | 0.0294± 0.0056 b | 0.0183 ± 0.0029 | 80.95 ± 14.29 | 1.43 ± 0.37 cd | 10:1 |
n | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
noom pepper | 0.61± 0.07 ab | 0.0906± 0.0126 b | 0.0155 ± 0.0005 | 79.50 ± 6.77 | 4.56 ± 0.60 b | 1:1 |
n | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
bird chili | 0.66± 0.23 ab | 0.0123± 0.0011 b | 0.0123± 0.0011 | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 d | 1:1 |
n | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
duey kai chili | 0.16± 0.16 bc | 0.0052 | 0.0052 | 100.00 | 1 | - |
n | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |
F-test | F6,63 = 5.242, p ≤ 0.0001 | F4,20.221 = 12.470, p ≤ 0.0001 | F4,16.875 = 2.472, p = 0.084 | F4,18.237 = 1.136, p = 0.371 | F4,16.922 = 4.583, p = 0.011 |
Plant’s Common Name | Fruit Width (mm) | Fruit Length (mm) | Fruit Firmness (kg/m2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unripe n = 10 | Ripe n = 10 | Unripe n = 10 | Ripe n = 10 | Unripe n = 3 | Ripe n = 3 | |
eggplant | 44.82 ± 2.39 a | 47.99 ± 2.39 a | 51.23 ± 1.59 c | 52.56 ± 2.27 c | 1.55 ± 0.18 a | 1.62 ± 0.16 a |
turkey berry | 10.07 ± 0.41 c | 11.17 ± 0.13 d | 12.21 ± 0.26 e | 12.11 ± 0.19 g | 1.02 ± 0.06 b | 1.07 ± 0.03 b |
banana pepper | 26.21 ± 1.11 b | 31.39 ± 1.24 b | 96.25 ± 3.38 b | 101.07 ± 4.15 b | 0.53 ± 0.04 d | 0.42 ± 0.02 d |
cayenne pepper | 10.27 ± 0.40 c | 10.74 ± 0.51 d | 42.94 ± 2.99 c | 44.02 ± 2.50 d | 0.73 ± 0.04 bcd | 0.50 ± 0.00 cd |
noom pepper | 26.46 ± 0.82 b | 21.71 ± 1.01 c | 148.62 ± 2.71 a | 147.39 ± 2.61 a | 0.88 ± 0.04 bc | 0.72 ± 0.02 c |
bird chili | 6.19 ± 0.20 d | 6.84 ± 0.16 e | 25.01 ± 0.88 d | 26.04 ± 1.23 f | 0.68 ± 0.06 cd | 0.68 ± 0.04 c |
duey kai chili | 5.32 ± 0.36 d | 5.52 ± 0.35 f | 29.54 ± 1.97 d | 34.98 ± 1.31 e | 0.82 ± 0.02 bcd | 0.53 ± 0.03 cd |
Plant’s Common Name | Total Phenolic Content (mgGAE/g FW) | Capsaicin (mg/g DW) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unripe (n = 3) | Ripe (n = 3) | Unripe (n = 3) | Ripe (n = 3) | |
eggplant | 3.90 ± 0.07 b | 2.72 ± 0.24 b | - | - |
turkey berry | 6.80 ± 0.16 a | 6.48 ± 0.24 a | - | - |
banana pepper | 1.35 ± 0.06 c | 1.68 ± 0.08 c | 0.66 ± 0.02 d | 1.30 ± 0.02 d |
cayenne pepper | 1.48 ± 0.09 c | 1.91 ± 0.01 c | 1.43 ± 0.04 b | 1.63 ± 0.03 c |
noom pepper | 1.23 ± 0.04 c | 1.63 ± 0.08 c | 0.85 ± 0.02 c | 1.35 ± 0.02 cd |
bird chili | 1.13 ± 0.04 c | 1.61 ± 0.11 c | 2.55 ± 0.04 a | 3.31 ± 0.02 a |
duey kai chili | 1.33 ± 0.11 c | 1.84 ± 0.06 c | 2.54 ± 0.04 a | 2.85 ± 0.03 b |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rattanapun, W.; Tarasin, M.; Thitithanakul, S.; Sontikun, Y. Host Preference of Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Among Fruits of Solanaceous Plants. Insects 2021, 12, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060482
Rattanapun W, Tarasin M, Thitithanakul S, Sontikun Y. Host Preference of Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Among Fruits of Solanaceous Plants. Insects. 2021; 12(6):482. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060482
Chicago/Turabian StyleRattanapun, Wigunda, Manop Tarasin, Suraphon Thitithanakul, and Yaowaphan Sontikun. 2021. "Host Preference of Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Among Fruits of Solanaceous Plants" Insects 12, no. 6: 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060482
APA StyleRattanapun, W., Tarasin, M., Thitithanakul, S., & Sontikun, Y. (2021). Host Preference of Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Among Fruits of Solanaceous Plants. Insects, 12(6), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060482