Next Article in Journal
Stability of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Reference Genes in Selected Tissues of the Ambrosia Beetle Xylosandrus germanus
Previous Article in Journal
Life History Traits in Two Drosophila Species Differently Affected by Microbiota Diversity under Lead Exposure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/insects12121124
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Natural Hybrids between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers

by
Nazar A. Shapoval
1,*,
Roman V. Yakovlev
2,3,
Galina N. Kuftina
1,
Vladimir A. Lukhtanov
1,
Svyatoslav A. Knyazev
3,
Anna E. Romanovich
4 and
Anatoly V. Krupitsky
5,6,*
1
Department of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab. 1, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
2
Institute of Biology, Tomsk State University, Lenina Pr. 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
3
Department of Ecology, Altai State University, Lenina Pr. 61, 656049 Barnaul, Russia
4
Resource Center for Development of Molecular and Cellular Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Nab., 7/9, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
5
Department of Entomology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Korp. 12, 119991 Moscow, Russia
6
Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Pr. 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(12), 1124; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121124
Submission received: 21 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Butterfly specimens with unusual morphological characters (e.g., unusual wing coloration) have contradictory interpretations in the literature and have been considered by different authors either as previously undescribed taxa, putative hybrids, or aberrations of well-known species. Such individuals clearly represent a taxonomic problem that needs to be addressed by scientists. The application of molecular techniques could shed light on the origin of morphological uncertainty. Here we use a combination of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers to analyze three lycaenid butterflies with unusual wing pattern, which are thought to represent naturally occurring hybrids due to their intermediate phenotype. We confirm their hybrid origin and indicate that the specimens are wild-caught hybrids between females of Callophrys rubi and males of Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi. Our data indicate that gene flow across species boundaries in these butterflies can occur long after speciation.

Abstract

Natural hybridization is rather widespread and common in animals and can have important evolutionary consequences. In terms of taxonomy, exploring hybridization and introgression is crucial in defining species boundaries and testing taxonomic hypotheses. In the present paper, we report on natural hybrid specimens between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758). To test the hypothesis of their hybrid origin, we employed the molecular mitochondrial (COI gene) and nuclear (wingless, RPS5, and Ca-ATPase genes) markers commonly used in phylogenetic studies and explored the morphology of the specimens. Our analysis revealed that hybrids bear mitochondrial haplotypes of C. rubi, while nuclear fragments are heterozygous, sharing a combination of A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi lineages. The hybrid specimens combine morphological characters of both genera. Our results for the first time empirically demonstrate the possibility of genetic introgression between these species and between the genera Callophrys and Ahlbergia on the whole.

1. Introduction

Individuals with exceptional phenotypic traits (e.g., unusual coloration or deviant morphological characters) clearly represent a taxonomic issue that needs to be addressed by scientists. Such individuals are often considered either as previously undescribed taxa or aberrations of well-known species, but could also be putative hybrids, i.e., represent consequences of hybridization.
Hybridization is defined as the reproduction between members of genetically distinct populations [1] producing offspring of mixed ancestry. Although natural hybridization is usually rare on a per-individual level, appearing of natural hybrids indicates that introgression between species, i.e., invasion of foreign genetic material into a native genome [2], is an ongoing and regular process in nature. On a per-species basis, hybridization events are rather widespread and common in animals [2,3] and can have important evolutionary consequences. In particular, hybridization may lead to speciation when two species hybridize and give rise to a novel independent species [2,3,4]. In terms of taxonomy, exploring hybridization and introgression is crucial in defining species boundaries [5] and testing existing taxonomic hypotheses.
Incorporation of new tools and techniques, such as analysis of mitochondrial (mtDNA) and nuclear (nucDNA) sequence data [6], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [7], genome-wide genotypic [8] and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers [9,10], allow testing phenotypically deviant individuals more precisely and clearly detect the hybrid origin of organisms. Modern data show that hybridization and introgression are more common and widespread events than it was assumed previously [11].
Hybridization is reported for different groups of butterflies, including lycaenids (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) (e.g., [10,11,12,13,14]), and may occur even between distinct genera or species that bear drastically different karyotypes, i.e., chromosome numbers [4,15,16,17]. In particular, intermediate specimens tentatively characterized as natural intergeneric/intersubgeneric hybrids were found by Warren and Robbins [15] (the hybrid between Callophrys (Callophrys) sheridanii (Edwards, 1877) and Callophrys (Incisalia) augustinus (Westwood, 1852)) and Ivonin and co-authors [17] (the hybrid between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758)), though conclusions about their hybrid nature were not confirmed by molecular phylogenetic analyses.
Callophrys Billberg, 1820 (sensu stricto) is a Holarctic genus of the tribe Eumaeini, subfamily Theclinae, comprising about 30 species distributed in Eurasia and North America [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Ahlbergia Bryk, 1947 is a genus of the tribe Eumaeini, subfamily Theclinae, occurring in mountains of East Asia, with a peak number of species in China [25,26]. A consistent survey of Ahlbergia was started relatively recently by Johnson [25], who outlined three so-called “Palaearctic elfin butterflies” genera, namely, Ahlbergia, Cissatsuma Johnson, 1992, and Novosatsuma Johnson, 1992, differing in genitalia structure. Since Johnson’s study, the total number of the Ahlbergia species has been raised to 33 [27,28,29].
The taxonomy of Ahlbergia and Callophrys is still debatable. Gillham [30] recognized Ahlbergia as a synonym of the New World genus Incisalia Scudder, 1872 based on the analysis of genitalia structure. Robbins 2004 [31] considered all the genera of the Palaearctic elfin butterflies sensu Johnson [25] and the American elfin genera Incisalia, Mitoura Scudder, 1872, Sandia Clench & Ehrlich, 1960, Xamia Clench, 1961, Cisincisalia Johnson, 1992, Loranthomitoura Ballmer & Pratt, 1992 and Deciduphagus Johnson, 1992 synonyms of Callophrys. Opler and Warren (2002) [32] and Pelham [33] treated some of these taxa as subgenera of Callophrys sensu lato; Pratt and co-authors [18] considered some of these taxa separate genera. Gorbunov [34] and Gorbunov and Kosterin [35] treated Ahlbergia as a subgenus of Callophrys. Ten Hagen and Miller [19] came to the same conclusion based on the phylogenetic analysis of the barcoding region of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I gene (COI).
Callophrys rubi and A. frivaldszkyi are the most common and widespread species of the genera Callophrys and Ahlbergia, respectively. The former species is distributed in entire Europe, North Africa, Turkey, northeast Iran, Near East, Siberia, and mountains of Central Asia [19]. The distribution range of the latter species covers a large part of Siberia from the Ural, Altai and Sayan Mountains to the continental Far East of Russia and Sakhalin, Korean Peninsula, Eastern and Central China (provinces of Liaoning, Heilongjiang, Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Gansu, Chongqing, and Guizhou) [27].
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi and C. rubi broadly share their range and habitats in Siberia. An intermediate specimen sharing external characters of both species was reported from Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia, by Ivonin and co-authors [17]. The authors considered it as a putative hybrid between these species. This assumption was made on the basis of analysis of external morphology alone and was not confirmed by molecular methods or analysis of genitalia structure.
At the beginning of June 2016, a putative hybrid specimen sharing external characters of A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi was collected by Roman Yakovlev in the vicinity of Bodaybo town (Irkutsk Oblast, Russia). Other specimens possessing phenotype intermediate between A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi were collected by Anatoly Filippov in mid-May 2018 in the vicinity of Ulan-Ude city (Russia, Buryatia Republic) and by Svyatoslav Knyazev in May 2021 in the vicinity of Samsonovo village (Russia, Omsk Oblast) (Figure 1).
In this study, we describe the morphology of the specimens in question and employ the molecular mitochondrial and nuclear markers commonly used in phylogenetic studies to test the hypothesis of the hybrid origin of these specimens and, in the event our hypothesis is correct, to identify the direction of the introgression. Additionally, we compare the external morphology of these specimens with a specimen reported by Ivonin and co-authors [17] from Novosibirsk Oblast.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimens Sampling

Putative hybrids and parental specimens were collected in Irkutsk and Omsk Oblasts (Russia) by R.V.Y. and S.A.K. during the field studies in 2016 and 2021, respectively. Searches for putative hybrid specimens in other sites of C. rubi and A. frivaldszkyi co-occurrence (conducted at “Aktru” Research Station, Altai Krai, Kosh-Agatch district, 50°03′37.1″ N; 87°24′05.0″ E) were unsuccessful. Legs of another putative hybrid specimen collected in the vicinity of Ulan-Ude city (Buryatia, Russia), as well as A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi specimens collected sympatrically and synchronously with the latter, were kindly provided by Anatoly Filippov (Russia, Ulan-Ude). Photos of the putative hybrid specimen reported by Ivonin and co-authors [17] from Novosibirsk Oblast were used for comparison. The list of the specimens used for the molecular analysis and the full collection data are given in Table 1. Collection acronyms used throughout the text are as follows: AFU, collection of Anatoly Filippov, Russia, Ulan-Ude; RYaB, collection of Roman Yakovlev, Russia, Barnaul; SKO, collection of Svyatoslav Knyazev, Russia, Omsk; SZMN, Siberian Zoological Museum, Novosibirsk, Russia.

2.2. Molecular Markers, DNA Extraction, and PCR Amplification

One mitochondrial (cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene) and three nuclear (ribosomal protein S5 (RpS5), wingless (Wg), and sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (Ca-ATPase)) genes were used as molecular markers.
One leg from each specimen was taken for DNA extraction using QIAamp DNA Investigator Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Mitochondrial DNA barcode (a 658 bp fragment of the COI gene) was amplified using LCO1490/HC2198 primer pair [36]. Primers HybLepWG1/HybLepWG2 [37], HybrpS5degF/HybrpS5degR [38], Ca-ATPase_F/Ca-ATPase_R [39] were used for nucDNA amplification and resulted in 403 bp fragment of the Wingless, 610 bp fragment of RPS5, and 445 bp fragment of Ca-ATPase genes, respectively.
The PCR amplifications were performed in a 25 μL reaction volume per sample. Each reaction contained 1 μL template DNA (ca. 10–50 ng genomic DNA), 1.3 μL of both forward and reverse primers aliquoted to a standard concentration of 10 μM, 5 μL of 5× ScreenMix (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), and 16.4 μL of ddH2O. The temperature profile for COI, RPS5, Ca-ATPase, and Wingless genes was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C (COI, Wingless)/55 °C (RPS5, Ca-ATPase) for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The purified PCR products were subjected to the further sequencing. We cloned Wingless and Ca-ATPase genes for three putative hybrid specimens for which standard sequencing revealed intra-individual heterogeneities in the form of single nucleotide polymorphism. The cloning procedure was performed following previously described protocols [4,40]; 10 clones of each gene per specimen were sequenced. Sequencing of the double-stranded product was carried out at the Research Resource Center for Molecular and Cell Technologies (St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia) using ABI 3500xL analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Phylogenetic Reconstructions

The sequences were checked, edited and aligned using CHROMAS 2.6.6 (http://www.technelysium.com.au/ (accessed on 20 September 2021)) and Geneious Prime 2021.2.2 [41] software. Primer sequences were cropped. Heterogeneous nucleotide positions of nuclear genes were identified through dual peaks present in electropherograms and coded as degenerate base symbols. Three nuclear genes were concatenated resulting in the final data set comprising a total of 1458 bp (403 bp of the Wingless, 610 bp of the RpS5, and 445 bp of the Ca-ATPase). The mitochondrial COI gene was analyzed separately. A Bayesian approach was used to estimate the phylogeny. The analyses were performed using the MrBayes v3.2.7a software [42] with the nucleotide substitution model GTR + G + I as suggested by jModelTest v2.1.10 [43]. Two independent MCMC runs of 10 million generations, with four simultaneous chains (one cold and three heated) for each analysis, were performed. The sampling of trees and parameters was set to every 1000 generations. The first 10% of trees were discarded as burn-in prior to computing a consensus phylogeny and posterior probabilities. The consensus of the obtained trees was visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, (accessed on 20 September 2021). TRACER, v1.7.1 was used for summarizing the results of the Bayesian phylogenetic analysis (http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed on 20 September 2021).
Since similar fragments of mitochondrial and three nuclear genes were obtained by us previously for Colias palaeno (Linnaeus, 1761), we used COI sequence and Wingless + RpS5 + Ca-ATPase concatenated sequence of one C. palaeno specimen to root the mitochondrial and nuclear phylograms.

2.4. Morphological Analysis

The nomenclature of the genitalia and wing pattern is adapted after Johnson [17] and [44]. The nervuration nomenclature follows Comstock-Needham system adapted for butterflies [45]. Abdomens of the studied specimens were removed and macerated in 10% KOH for the examination of the male genitalia. After cleaning in water and dehydration in 96% EtOH, a genital capsule with valvae and separated aedeagus were placed in a drop of glycerol, covered with a cover glass and, photographed. In the case of the genital capsule, photos were taken in ventral and lateral views, and in lateral view in the case of the aedeagus. The images of the studied specimens were taken with a digital camera Canon EOS 5D mark II (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Sigma 150 mm f2.8 lens (Sigma Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan), using originally developed light system and a flash Canon Speedlight 430 EX (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with a diffuser. The images of the genitalia were taken with a Canon EOS 6D digital camera (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 lens (Micromed, St. Petersburg, Russia), using two Micromed Dual Goose illuminators. Obtained images were edited using Adobe Photoshop CC 2014.2.2 software.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology

3.1.1. Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi

Male (Figure 2a).
Head: antenna black, white-ringed at base of segments, club dark, its base white ventrally, apiculus brown. Eye dark brown with small pale brown hairs, surrounded with white scales. Frons grey-brown with dark brown hairs, top of head with tuft of dark brown and whitish hairs.
Palpus: 2nd and 3rd segment dark brown with admixture of white scales and dark brown hairs.
Thorax: dorsal side dark grey with dark blue-grey hairs; ventral side with whitish hairs. Leg grey with white rings at base of tarsomeres.
Abdomen: dark brown dorsally, ventral side with whitish hairs.
Forewing: triangular with somewhat wavy margin and rounded apex. Forewing length usually 8.0–15.0 mm. Dorsal side of forewing brown with bluish shine and blue scales, more intensive basally. Veins dark brown. Margin dark brown proximally, light brown distally. Fringe dark brown proximally, whitish distally, veins marked by dark brown tufts. Androconial spot oblong, very narrow, brown, length about 1.0 mm. Ventral side of forewing generally brown, dark brown basally, light brown in spaces CuA2–2A. Postmedial line usually well-developed, dark brown from inside, suffused with whitish scales from outside. Crescent line usually poorly developed, submarginal area suffused with scattered white scales. Margin and fringe as on dorsal side.
Hindwing: rounded, with straight costal edge, crenated margin and well-developed anal lobe. Dorsal side brown with more or less developed blue field interrupted by brown spots in submarginal area of spaces M3–CuA2. Margin dark brown proximally, light brown distally. Fringe dark brown proximally, whitish distally, veins marked by dark brown tufts; anal lobe with dark brown scales and hairs. Ventral side of wing motley, covered with scattered white scales. Basal disc dark brown, its marginal band wavy, of irregular shape, with large projection in space M3 typical for the genus. Postbasal marks usually indistinct. Outer margin of band of disc covered with white scales, usually more intensively in spaces Sc + R1 and 2A–3A. Crescent line dark brown, limbal area covered with scattered white scales. Margin, fringe, and anal lobe as on dorsal side.
Male genitalia (Figure 3a): annulus somewhat wider than uncus, extended in middle part of genital capsule; lobes of uncus with well-developed chitinous processes rounded at tips; falx stout, pointed; valva broad, lanceolate, strongly broadened basally, gradually tapering to apex, tip of valva rounded; saccus rather short, triangular; aedeagus rather long, about 1.6x genitalia length, slightly curved, with straight upper cornutus and arcuate lower cornutus.
Female.
Similar to male, blue fields on both wings usually wider and of more intensive color.

3.1.2. Calloprhys rubi

Male.
Head: antenna black, white-ringed at base of segments, club dark, its base white below, apiculus brown. Eye brown with small pale brown hairs, surrounded with green scales. Frons dark brown with pale hairs, top of head with brownish hairs.
Palpus: 2nd segment greenish-white with green scales and white, black and pale green hairs below; 3rd segment black with white hairs and scales.
Thorax: dorsal side brown with grey hairs, ventral side with whitish hairs. Leg white with brown scales and white hairs and with white rings at base of tarsomeres.
Abdomen: brown dorsally, ventral side with whitish hairs.
Forewing: triangular with rounded apex. Forewing length usually 10.0–15.0 mm. Dorsal side of forewing brown. Veins and margin dark brown. Fringe brown proximally, whitish distally. Androconial spot ovoid, light or brown, length about 1.0 mm. Ventral side of forewing grassy green, with emerald green scales near base of wing, light brown in spaces CuA2–2A. White postmedial line usually absent, rarely developed. Margin brown proximally, light brown distally. Fringe as on dorsal side.
Hindwing: rounded, with somewhat wavy margin and well-developed anal lobe. Dorsal side of forewing brown. Veins dark brown. Margin dark brown. Fringe brown proximally, whitish distally, veins marked by brown tufts. Anal lobe marked with dark brown scales and hairs. Wing densely covered with long brown or ochraceous hairs, more intensively at base and anal lobe. Ventral side of hindwing grassy green, with emerald green scales near base of wing. White postmedial line consisted of white strikes suffused with brownish scales from inside, rarely fully developed, usually strongly reduced to single strike in space Sc + R1 or totally absent. Margin, fringe, and anal lobe as on dorsal side.
Male genitalia (Figure 3b): annulus somewhat wider than uncus; lobes of uncus with well-developed chitinous processes rounded at tips; falx stout, pointed; valva narrow, slightly broadened in membranous part and narrowed at base, extended, evenly pointed to tip; saccus rather long, narrow, rounded at tip; aedeagus rather long, about 1.5× genitalia length, slightly curved, with straight upper cornutus and arcuate lower cornutus.
Female (Figure 2b).
Similar to male.

3.1.3. Putative Hybrid Specimens A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi

Specimen_ A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi CFR01 (Figure 2c)
Head: antenna black, white-ringed at base of segments, club dark, its base white ventrally, apiculus brown. Eye dark brown with small pale brown hairs, surrounded with white scales. Frons grey-brown with dark grey hairs, top of head with tuft of dark grey hairs. Palpus: 2nd and 3rd segment dark grey with admixture of white scales and dark brown hairs. Thorax: upperside dark grey with dark blue-grey hairs; underside with grey hairs. Legs dark grey with black scales and white hairs.
Abdomen: dark grey dorsally, ventral side with grey hairs.
Forewing: triangular with straight margin between veins M3–A1–2A and rounded apex. Forewing length 13.0 mm. Dorsal side of forewing dark steel with bluish shine, more intensive basally, and rare scattered blue scales. Fringe dark brown proximally, grey distally, darker at veins. Androconial spot oblong, rather narrow, brownish grey, length about 1.0 mm. Ventrally forewing greyish-brown in spaces CuA2–2A, green from base of wing to transverse vein, greyish-brown with admixture of green scales in postdiscal area, dark brown blurred postmedial line and brown submarginal area. Margin greyish-brown, fringe as on dorsal side.
Hindwing: rounded, with wavy margin and well-developed anal lobe. Dorsal side steel with bluish shine and rare scattered blue scales. Margin dark brown. Fringe brown proximally, dirty white between veins and dark brown at veins distally; anal lobe with black and white scales and hairs. Ventral side of wing dirty green basally, green with admixture of brown and emerald scales in basal disc, postbasal marks absent, with group of dark scales marking transverse vein, rather broad dark marginal band of disc of irregular shape, U-curved at inner margin, marked with groups of white scales in middle part and at costa; postdiscal area green with emerald scales, emerald suffusion more intensive in spaces CuA2–2A near marginal band of disc; crescent line with blurred margin, dark brown with admixture of emerald scales; submarginal (limbal) area dark brown with intensive suffusion of white scales in spaces M1–CuA2; anal lobe with dark brown spot and long dark brown scales and hairs; margin dark brown; fringe as on dorsal side.
Genitalia (Figure 3c): annulus somewhat wider than uncus, extended in middle part of genital capsule; lobes of uncus with well-developed chitinous processes rounded at tips; falx stout, pointed; valva lanceolate, somewhat broadened basally, gradually tapering to apex, with nearly straight outer margin, tip of valva slightly bent to side; saccus long, triangular; aedeagus rather long, about 1.8× genitalia length, curved, with straight upper cornutus and arcuate lower cornutus.
Specimen A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi CFR02 (Figure 2d)
Compared with the specimen CFR01, the specimen from Buryatia differs in dirty green ventral side of wings (green with admixture of emerald scales in specimen CFR01) as well as more serrated marginal band of disc (wavy marginal band of disc in specimen CFR01). Genitalia were not studied.
Specimen A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi CFR03 (Figure 2e)
Rather worn specimen generally resembling the specimen CFR02. Differs from both previous specimens in less developed bluish dorsal coloration of wings as well as less developed ventral green fields of wings. Genitalia as in the specimen CFR01.
Specimen A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi (Figure 2f)
A detailed description was given by Ivonin and co-authors [17]. Differs from the previous specimens in brown coloration of wings underside lacking green scales. Basal disc of hindwing dark brown, postdiscal area brown. Genitalia were not studied by us as the specimen was not accessible.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

Analysis of the 658 bp fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene of A. frivaldszkyi demonstrated that specimens collected in Buryatia, Irkutsk, and Omsk share a unique single haplotype (Ah01) differing in at least four fixed nucleotide substitutions (overall mean p-distance is 0.4%, SE = 0.2%) from C. rubi specimens collected at the same localities (Table 2). On the contrary, analyzed specimens of C. rubi form three haplotypes: Cl01, common for Buryatia, Irkutsk and Omsk populations; Cl02, found only in a single specimen from Irkutsk and differing from the haplotype Cl01 in one nucleotide substitution (A => G) in the position 310; Cl03, found in a single specimen from Buryatia and differing from the haplotype Cl01 in three nucleotide substitutions: T => C in the positions 82 and 400, and C => A in the position 529.
The putative hybrid specimens from Irkutsk and Buryatia share their mitochondrial haplotypes (Cl01 and Cl03, respectively) with C. rubi, while the third putative hybrid specimen from Omsk is characterized by the unique haplotype AhCl01 differing from the most common for C. rubi haplotype Cl01 in one nucleotide substitution T => C in the position 406.
Analysis of the 610 bp fragment of the nuclear RPS5 gene of the studied A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi specimens reveals a low level of intraindividual heterozygosity (as evidenced by dual peaks of similar height in the electropherograms), and no fixed nucleotide substitutions separating these species. Analysis of the nuclear Wingless and Ca-ATPase genes fragments detect no intraindividual heterozygous sites in all of the studied A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi specimens. At the same time, A. frivaldszkyi differs from C. rubi in two fixed substitutions of the studied Wingless (namely, positions 213 and 271) and Ca-ATPase (namely, positions 151 and 334) gene fragments. The fragments in question of the putative hybrid specimens are heterozygous in these positions sharing species-specific nucleotides of both, A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
To confirm our hypothesis on a hybrid origin of specimens, we conducted a cloning procedure of the wingless and Ca-ATPase gene fragments of the putative hybrid specimens. This analysis revealed that 10 clones obtained for each gene fragment clearly split into two groups corresponding to A. frivaldszkyi variant (clone group #2) and C. rubi variant (clone group #1) (Figure 6). Thus, heterozygosity of the studied specimens revealed by direct sequencing of nuclear genes is a result of the shared combination of both lineages, A. frivaldszkyi-type and C. rubi-type. In the phylogenetic reconstructions based on the analysis of the 658 bp fragment of mitochondrial COI gene, A. frivaldszkyi and C. rubi were recovered together as a strongly supported monophyletic entity (PP = 1) (Figure 6). Within this entity, A. frivaldszkyi formed an independent well-supported lineage (PP = 1), whereas the specimens of C. rubi and the putative hybrids formed a paraphyletic cluster. One C. rubi specimen and the putative hybrid from Buryatia formed weakly supported clade (PP = 0.63), while the majority of the analyzed C. rubi specimens and the putative hybrid specimens from Irkutsk and Omsk Oblasts were placed on a polytomic branch opposed to the A. frivaldszkyi group. In the phylogenetic inference of the concatenated alignment of the nuclear markers, two groups of the sequenced hybrid clones, referred to the A. frivaldszkyi-type and C. rubi-type, were analyzed as independent samples (Figure 6). Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi and C. rubi specimens recovered together in the phylogenetic tree as a highly supported monophyletic entity (PP = 1). Within this entity, A. frivaldszkyi-type clones of putative hybrids and samples of A. frivaldszkyi formed a well-supported clade (PP = 0.96), whereas C. rubi specimens and C. rubi-type clones of the hybrid samples were found to be paraphyletic with respect to the A. frivaldszkyi lineage.

4. Discussion

The presence of the COI haplotypes of C. rubi and heterozygosity in fixed substitutions of analyzed regions of nuclear genes wingless and Ca-ATPase in the combination with intermediate morphological characters confirm our hypothesis on a hybrid origin of the specimens in question. In the cells of most animals, mtDNA is characterized by maternal inheritance, i.e., it is inherited solely from the mitochondria of the oocyte from which the animal develops [46]. In our case, the analysis revealed that the hybrid specimens inherited mtDNA from females of C. rubi and nuclear genes from both species.
An overall mean genetic distance of COI barcodes between analyzed specimens of C. rubi and A. frivaldszkyi is 0.4%. This value is much less than a species threshold of about 3%, which was empirically found for Lepidoptera [47]. Shared or very close COI mitochondrial barcodes in butterfly species, including lycaenids, can be explained by the mitochondrial introgression [4,48,49,50]. Ten Hagen and Miller [19] suggested the mitochondrial introgression in the genus Callophrys on the basis of an absence of fixed nucleotide substitutions in COI between morphologically differentiated species as well as the close genetic affinity between C. rubi and A. frivaldszkyi. Our results for the first time empirically demonstrate the possibility of genetic introgression between these species and between the genera Callophrys and Ahlbergia on the whole. The possibility of hybridization with further introgression of genome parts between these species is probably a result of similar genitalia structure, especially in males, and co-occurring in their habitats: both species are often spotted together [17]. Additionally, host plants of A. frivaldszkyi, Spiraea spp., are also known to be utilized by polyphagous C. rubi [51]. The cytogenetic background of the hybridization of Callophrys and Ahlbergia is unknown. Most Lycaenidae species have a haploid complement of either 23 or 24 chromosomes [52,53,54]. According to Federley [55] and Bigger [56], the haploid chromosome number of C. rubi is 23. The same number was reported for another Palaearctic species of the tribe Eumaeini, Satyrium pruni [51], so we cannot exclude the possibility that Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi also has a haploid complement of 23 chromosomes.
Externally, three revealed hybrid specimens from Irkutsk, Omsk Oblasts, and Buryatia combine characters of both genera. The following characters are of A. frivaldszkyi: forewing with angled outer margin (rounded in C. rubi), bluish tint of dorsal side of wings (wings brown dorsally in C. rubi), dark marginal band of disc (postdiscal band of white strikes in C. rubi), crescent line and suffusion of white scales of ventral side of hindwing (absent in C. rubi). Rounded hindwing (hindwing with straight costa and serrated outer margin in A. frivaldszkyi), green coloration of ventral side of wings, rounded marginal band of disc homologous to the postdiscal band of Callophrys (strongly incised marginal band of disc in A. frivaldszkyi) are the characters of C. rubi. An intermediate specimen between C. rubi and A. frivaldszkyi reported from Novosibirsk Oblast, which was considered a putative hybrid [17], lacks green coloration and more resembles A. frivaldszkyi than C. rubi.
In the male genitalia of the hybrid specimens, the shapes of annulus, uncus and saccus are generally of C. rubi, while the shape of valva is intermediate, with large slightly broadened basal portion as in C. rubi (shorter strongly broadened base of valva in A. frivaldszkyi) and nearly straight outer margin gradually tapering to apex as in A. frivaldszkyi (concave outer margin of valva in C. rubi).
Another known example of hybridization in the elfin butterflies resembling our case is a putative natural hybrid between Nearctic species Callophrys (Callophrys) sheridanii (Edwards, 1877) and Callophrys (Mitoura) augustinus (Westwood, 1852) described by Warren & Robbins [15]. This specimen combines green coloration of C. (C.) sheridanii and details of wings pattern of C. (M.) augustinus, while most of the characters (shape of hindwing, shape and position of hindwing marginal band of disc, shape of the genitalic sclerites) are intermediate. Our findings revealed homology of the marginal band of disc of Ahlbergia and the white postdiscal band of Callophrys, supporting the hypothesis of Warren & Robbins [15] of homology of these elements of the pattern in Callophrys and Mitoura. Interestingly, green coloration and developed pattern of the ventral side of the wings of the studied hybrid specimens from Irkutsk, Omsk Oblasts, and Buryatia resemble those of some Nearctic Callophrys, especially C. gryneus (Hübner, 1819).
From the taxonomic point of view, our findings demonstrate that Callophrys and Ahlbergia are very close genetically, but do not put a period to long-lasting argues if the Callophrys should be treated as a diverse genus uniting green hairstreaks and both elfin butterflies of Palaearctic and Nearctic as subgenera or Holarctic green hairstreaks and different groups of Holarctic elfin butterflies are separate genera. The final taxonomic conclusion should be based on a multilocus molecular phylogenetic analysis.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that utilization of unlinked molecular marker analysis, namely mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genes, can successfully discriminate natural hybrids in the taxonomically complicated lycaenid genera Callophrys and Ahlbergia. The molecular findings are confirmed by intermediate morphological characters combining both traits of C. rubi and A. frivaldszkyi revealed in the hybrid specimens. The taxonomy of Ahlbergia and Callophrys is debatable, and the phylogenetic relationships of these genera still remain unclear. Our analyses demonstrate that Callophrys and Ahlbergia are very close genetically, and their phylogeny needs further investigations using a multilocus molecular phylogenetic analysis.

Author Contributions

Project design, N.A.S., A.V.K.; conceptualization, N.A.S., A.V.K., V.A.L.; methodology, N.A.S., A.V.K.; PCR amplification and sequencing, N.A.S., G.N.K., A.E.R.; molecular analysis, N.A.S., G.N.K.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A.S., A.V.K.; writing—review and editing, V.A.L., R.V.Y.; figure preparation, N.A.S., G.N.K., A.V.K. Collecting material, R.V.Y., S.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The financial support for this study was provided to A.V.K. by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 21-74-00021 (morphological analysis) and to N.A.S. and V.A.L. by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 19-14-00202 (molecular analysis) and the state research project No. AAAA-A19-119020790106-0 (collecting the material).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The reported study was carried out using the research equipment of the Unique Research Installation ‘‘System of experimental bases located along the latitudinal gradient’’ TSU supported by Ministry of Education and Science of Russia (RF—2296.61321X0043, Agreement No. 075-15-2021-672) (http://ckp-rf.ru/usu/586718/; http://www.secnet.online/megaustanovka-ru.html) (accessed on 20 September 2021). The authors are grateful to Anatoly Filippov for providing material for DNA analysis and images of hybrid specimen collected in Buryatia, and Oleg Kosterin, who kindly allowed us to use his image of A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi putative hybrid deposited in SZMN.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Barton, N.H.; Hewitt, G.M. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16, 113–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mallet, J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mallet, J. Hybrid speciation. Nature 2007, 446, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lukhtanov, V.A.; Shapoval, N.A.; Anokhin, B.A.; Saifitdinova, A.F.; Kuznetsova, V.G. Homoploid hybrid speciation and genome evolution via chromosome sorting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20150157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Harrison, R.G.; Larson, E. Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J. Hered. 2014, 105, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bull, V.; Beltrán, M.; Jiggins, C.D.; McMillan, W.O.; Bermingham, E.; Mallet, J. Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species. BMC Biol. 2006, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kronforst, M.R.; Young, L.G.; Blume, L.M.; Gilbert, L.E. Multilocus analyses of admixture and introgression among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 2006, 60, 1254–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kronforst, M.R. Gene flow persists millions of years after speciation in Heliconius butterflies. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hundsdoerfer, A.K.; Kitching, I.J.; Wink, M. The phylogeny of the Hyles euphorbiae complex (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): Molecular evidence from sequence data and ISSR-PCR fingerprints. Org. Divers. Evol. 2005, 5, 173–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jasso-Martínez, J.M.; Machkour-M’Rabet, S.; Vila, R.; Rodríguez-Arnaiz, R.; Castañeda-Sortibrán, A.N. Molecular evidence of hybridization in sympatric populations of the Enantia jethys complex (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Abbott, R.; Albach, D.; Ansell, S.; Arntzen, J.W.; Baird, S.J.E.; Bierne, N.; Boughman, J.; Brelsford, A.; Buerkle, C.A.; Buggs, R.; et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sperling, F.A.H. Natural hybrids of Papilio (Insecta: Lepidoptera): Poor taxonomy or interesting evolutionary problem? Can. J. Zool. 1990, 68, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mullen, S.P.; Dopman, E.B.; Harrison, R.G. Hybrid zone origins, species boundaries, and the evolution of wing-pattern diversity in a polytypic species complex of north American admiral butterflies (Nymphalidae: Limenitis). Evolution 2008, 62, 1400–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dwyer, H.E.; Jasieniuk, M.; Okada, M.; Shapiro, A.M. Molecular evidence for hybridization in Colias (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): Are Colias hybrids really hybrids? Ecol. Evol. 2015, 5, 2865–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Warren, A.D.; Robbins, R.K. A natural hybrid between Callophrys (Callophrys) sheridanii and C. (Incisalia) augustinus (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 1993, 47, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
  16. ten Hagen, W. Freilandhybriden bei Bläulingen aus Ostanatolien und Iran (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nachr. Entomol. Ver. Apollo 2003, 23, 199–203. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ivonin, V.V.; Kosterin, O.E.; Nikolaev, S.L. Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Diurna) of Novosibirskaya Oblast, Russia. 2. Lycaenidae. Euroasian Entomol. J. 2011, 10, 217–242. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pratt, G.F.; Ballmer, G.R.; Wright, D.M. Allozyme-Based Phylogeny of North American Callophrys (s. l.) (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 2011, 65, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. ten Hagen, W.; Miller, M.A. Molekulargenetische Untersuchungen der paläarktischen Arten des Genus Callophrys Billberg, 1820 mit Hilfe von mtDNA-COI-Barcodes und taxonomische Überlegungen (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nachr. Entomol. Ver. Apollo 2010, 30, 177–197. [Google Scholar]
  20. Krupitsky, A.V.; Devyatkin, A.L. Taxonomic studies on the Callophrys suaveola (Staudinger, 1881)—Species group: A new species from South Iran. Atalanta 2012, 43, 149–150. [Google Scholar]
  21. ten Hagen, W. Beschreibung neuer Unterarten des Genus Callophrys Billberg, 1820 aus Iran (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Nachr. Entomol. Ver. Apollo 2012, 33, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krupitsky, A.V.; Pljushtsh, I.G.; Pak, O.V. Taxonomic studies on the Callophrys suaveola (Staudinger, 1881)—Species group: A new species from Central Afghanistan. Atalanta 2012, 43, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  23. Krupitsky, A.V.; Kolesnichenko, K.A. A new species of the Callophrys mystaphia Miller, 1913—Group from Iran (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Eumaeini). Zootaxa 2013, 3619, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Krupitsky, A.V.; Pljushtch, I.G.; Pak, O.V. A new species of the Callophrys paulae Pfeiffer, 1932 species group from Afghanistan (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Zootaxa 2015, 4027, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Johnson, K. The Palaearctic «elfin» butterflies (Lycaenidae, Theclinae). Neue Entomol. Nachr. 1992, 29, 1–141. [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang, H.; Zhou, L.-P. Discovery of two new species of the “elfin” butterflies from Shaanxi province, China. Atalanta 2014, 45, 139–150. [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang, H.; Zhu, J.-Q. Ahlbergia maoweiweii sp. n. from Shaanxi, China with revisional notes on similar species (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Zootaxa 2016, 4114, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, H.; Sun, W.-H. Ahlbergia bijieensis spec. nov. from Guizhou, China (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Atalanta 2016, 47, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang, H. New and little known butterflies from China—4. Atalanta 2021, 52, 345–413. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilham, N.W. Incisalia Scudderi, a Holarctic Genus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Psyche: A J. Entomol. 1955, 62, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Robbins, R.K. Lycaenidae. Theclinae. Tribe Eumaeini. In Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera; Lamas, G., Heppner, J.B., Eds.; Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea–Papilionoidea; Association for Tropical Lepidoptera and Scientific Publishers: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2004; pp. 118–137. [Google Scholar]
  32. Opler, P.A.; Warren, A.D. Butterflies of North America. 2. Scientific Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, North of Mexico; Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity; Colorado State University: Ft. Collins, CO, USA, 2004; p. 83. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pelham, J.P. A catalogue of the butterflies of the United States and Canada, with a complete bibliography of the descriptive and systematic literature. J. Res. Lepid. 2008, 40, 1–652. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gorbunov, P.Y. The Butterflies of Russia: Classification, Genitalia, Keys for Identification (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea); Thesis Universität Ekaterinburg: Ekaterinburg, Russia, 2001; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gorbunov, P.Y.; Kosterin, O.E. The Butterflies (Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea) of North Asia (Asian Part of Russia) in Nature; Rodina & Fodio: Moscow, Russia; Gallery Fund: Cheliabinsk, Russia, 2003; Volume 1, p. 392. [Google Scholar]
  36. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R.C. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  37. Brower, A.V.Z.; DeSalle, R. Mitochondrial vs. nuclear DNA sequence evolution among nymphalid butterflies: The utility of Wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Mol. Biol. 1998, 7, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wahlberg, N.; Wheat, C.W. Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: Designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wahlberg, N.; Peña, C.; Ahola, M.; Wheat, C.W.; Rota, J. PCR primers for 30 novel gene regions in the nuclear genomes of Lepidoptera. ZooKeys 2016, 596, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Shapoval, N.A.; Lukhtanov, V.A. Intragenomic variations of multicopy ITS2 marker in Agrodiaetus blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Comp. Cytogenet. 2015, 9, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. JModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Krupitsky, A.V. A new “elfin” butterfly species of Cissatsuma Johnson, 1992 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) from northwestern Sichuan, China. Zootaxa 2018, 4524, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miller, L.D. Nomenclature of wing weins and cells. J. Res. Lepid. 1970, 8, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  46. Birky, C.W., Jr. Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: Mechanisms and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 11331–11338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; DeWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lukhtanov, V.A.; Shapoval, N.A. Detection of cryptic species in sympatry using population analysis of unlinked genetic markers: A study of the Agrodiaetus kendevani species complex (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2008, 423, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lukhtanov, V.A.; Sourakov, A.; Zakharov, E.V.; Hebert, P.D.N. DNA barcoding Central Asian butterflies: Increasing geographical dimension does not significantly reduce the success of species identification. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9, 1302–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lukhtanov, V.A.; Shapoval, N.A. Chromosomal identification of cryptic species sharing their DNA barcodes: Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) antidolus and P. (A.) morgani in Iran (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Comp. Cytogenet. 2017, 11, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tuzov, V. Guide to the Butterflies of Russia and Adjacent Territories; Pensoft Publishers: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2000; Volume 2, p. 580. [Google Scholar]
  52. de Lesse, H. Spéciation et variation chromosomique chez les Lépidoptères Rhopalocères. Ann. Sci. Nat. 1960, 2, 1–224. [Google Scholar]
  53. Robinson, R. Lepidoptera Genetics; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1971; p. 687. [Google Scholar]
  54. Stekolnikov, A.A.; Ivanov, V.D.; Kuznetzov, V.I.; Lukhtanov, V.A. Evolution of chromosomes, wing articulation, male genitalia and phylogeny of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea). Entomol. Obozr. 2000, 79, 123–149. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  55. Federley, H. Chromosomenzahlen finnländischer Lepidopteren I. Rhopalocera. Hereditas 1938, 24, 397–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bigger, T.R.L. Chromosome numbers of Lepidoptera. Part II. Ent. Gaz. 1961, 12, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
Insects 12 01124 g001 550
Figure 1. Map showing sampling localities of the analyzed specimens of putative hybrids and parental species. (1) Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vic. Bodaybo; (2) Russia, Buryatia Republic, vic. Ulan-Ude city; (3) Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast, Matveevsky Range, Poldnevaya riv.; (4) Russia, Omsk Oblast, vic. Samsonovo vill.
Figure 1. Map showing sampling localities of the analyzed specimens of putative hybrids and parental species. (1) Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vic. Bodaybo; (2) Russia, Buryatia Republic, vic. Ulan-Ude city; (3) Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast, Matveevsky Range, Poldnevaya riv.; (4) Russia, Omsk Oblast, vic. Samsonovo vill.
Insects 12 01124 g001
Insects 12 01124 g002 550
Figure 2. Putative hybrid specimens and parental species, dorsal (left) and ventral (right) side of wings (a–f). (a) A. frivaldszkyi, (b) C. rubi, (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR01 (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)), (d) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR02 [Russia, Buryatia Republic, Pribaikalskij district, 10 km N of Ulan-Ude city, 51°57′15.92″ N; 107°41′23.62″ E, 15.V.2018, A.V. Filippov leg. (AFU)], photo A. Filippov, (e) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR03 (Russia, Omsk Oblast, Tarskiy district, 3 km E of Samsonovo vill., 56°58′27.90″ N; 74°24′43.39″ E, 15.V.2021, S.A. Knyazev leg. (SKO)), (f) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi hybrid, (Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast, Maslyaninskiy district, Matveevsky Range, Poldnevaya riv., 14.V.2004, Nikolaev leg. (SZMN)), photo O. Kosterin.
Figure 2. Putative hybrid specimens and parental species, dorsal (left) and ventral (right) side of wings (a–f). (a) A. frivaldszkyi, (b) C. rubi, (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR01 (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)), (d) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR02 [Russia, Buryatia Republic, Pribaikalskij district, 10 km N of Ulan-Ude city, 51°57′15.92″ N; 107°41′23.62″ E, 15.V.2018, A.V. Filippov leg. (AFU)], photo A. Filippov, (e) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR03 (Russia, Omsk Oblast, Tarskiy district, 3 km E of Samsonovo vill., 56°58′27.90″ N; 74°24′43.39″ E, 15.V.2021, S.A. Knyazev leg. (SKO)), (f) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi hybrid, (Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast, Maslyaninskiy district, Matveevsky Range, Poldnevaya riv., 14.V.2004, Nikolaev leg. (SZMN)), photo O. Kosterin.
Insects 12 01124 g002
Insects 12 01124 g003 550
Figure 3. Male genitalia of the parental species and a putative hybrid (a–c): genital capsule with valvae, ventral view; right valva, ventral view; genital capsule with valvae, lateral view; aedeagus, lateral view. (a) A. frivaldszkyi, sample ID—10FR, (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)), (b) C. rubi, sample ID—05RUB, (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)), (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi putative hybrid, specimen ID—CFR01 (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)).
Figure 3. Male genitalia of the parental species and a putative hybrid (a–c): genital capsule with valvae, ventral view; right valva, ventral view; genital capsule with valvae, lateral view; aedeagus, lateral view. (a) A. frivaldszkyi, sample ID—10FR, (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)), (b) C. rubi, sample ID—05RUB, (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)), (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi putative hybrid, specimen ID—CFR01 (Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. (RYaB)).
Insects 12 01124 g003
Insects 12 01124 g004 550
Figure 4. Electropherogram of Ca-ATPase nuclear gene fragment of parental species and putative hybrids (a–e). (a) A. frivaldszkyi, (b) C. rubi, (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR01, (d) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR02, (e) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR03. Fixed A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi interspecific nucleotide differences are boxed. Arrows indicate mixed signals in putative hybrids.
Figure 4. Electropherogram of Ca-ATPase nuclear gene fragment of parental species and putative hybrids (a–e). (a) A. frivaldszkyi, (b) C. rubi, (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR01, (d) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR02, (e) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR03. Fixed A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi interspecific nucleotide differences are boxed. Arrows indicate mixed signals in putative hybrids.
Insects 12 01124 g004
Insects 12 01124 g005 550
Figure 5. Electropherogram of Wingless nuclear gene fragment of parental species and putative hybrids (a–e). (a) A. frivaldszkyi, (b) C. rubi, (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR01, (d) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR02, (e) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR03. Fixed A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi interspecific nucleotide differences are boxed. Arrows indicate mixed signals in putative hybrids.
Figure 5. Electropherogram of Wingless nuclear gene fragment of parental species and putative hybrids (a–e). (a) A. frivaldszkyi, (b) C. rubi, (c) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR01, (d) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR02, (e) A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi, sample ID—CFR03. Fixed A. frivaldszkyi × C. rubi interspecific nucleotide differences are boxed. Arrows indicate mixed signals in putative hybrids.
Insects 12 01124 g005
Insects 12 01124 g006 550
Figure 6. The Bayesian consensus trees of the analyzed specimens of C. rubi, A. frivaldszkyi and putative hybrids inferred from COI sequences (left) and concatenated alignment of three nuclear markers (Wingless, RPS5, Ca-ATPase) (right). Branches with Bayesian posterior probability values >0.60 are shown. Scale bar = 0.2 substitutions per position.
Figure 6. The Bayesian consensus trees of the analyzed specimens of C. rubi, A. frivaldszkyi and putative hybrids inferred from COI sequences (left) and concatenated alignment of three nuclear markers (Wingless, RPS5, Ca-ATPase) (right). Branches with Bayesian posterior probability values >0.60 are shown. Scale bar = 0.2 substitutions per position.
Insects 12 01124 g006
Table
Table 1. List of the studied materials.
Table 1. List of the studied materials.
TaxonSample IDGenBank Accession NumberLocality
COIWinglessCa-ATPaseRPS5
Callophrys rubi × Ahlbergia frivaldszkyiCFR01MW785873MW811215
MW811216		MW811223
MW811224		MW811246Irkutsk *
Callophrys rubi × Ahlbergia frivaldszkyiCFR02MW785872OL584270
OL584273		MW811225
MW811226		OL584250Buryatia **
Callophrys rubi × Ahlbergia frivaldszkyiCFR03OL457027OL584271
OL584272		OL584293
OL584294		OL584251Omsk ***
Callophrys rubi01RUBMW785853MW811207OL584295MW811237Irkutsk
Callophrys rubi02RUBMW785854MW811208MW811219MW811238Irkutsk
Callophrys rubi03RUBMW785855MW811209MW811218MW811239Irkutsk
Callophrys rubi04RUBMW785856MW811210MW811217MW811240Irkutsk
Callophrys rubi05RUBMW785857OL584274OL584296MW811241Irkutsk
Callophrys rubi15RUBMW785862OL584275MW811227OL584252Buryatia
Callophrys rubi16RUBMW785863OL584276MW811228OL584253Buryatia
Callophrys rubi17RUBMW785864OL584277MW811229OL584254Buryatia
Callophrys rubi18RUBMW785865OL584278MW811230OL584255Buryatia
Callophrys rubi19RUBMW785866OL584279MW811231OL584256Buryatia
Callophrys rubi28RUBOL457028OL584280OL584297OL584257Omsk
Callophrys rubi29RUBOL457029OL584281OL584298OL584258Omsk
Callophrys rubi30RUBOL457030OL584282OL584299OL584259Omsk
Callophrys rubi31RUBOL457031OL584283OL584300OL584260Omsk
Callophrys rubi32RUBOL457032OL584284OL584301OL584261Omsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi06FRMW785858MW811211MW811220MW811242Irkutsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi07FRMW785859MW811212MW811221MW811243Irkutsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi08FRMW785860MW811213MW811222MW811244Irkutsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi10FRMW785861MW811214OL584302MW811245Irkutsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi20FRMW785867OL584285MW811232OL584266Buryatia
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi21FRMW785868OL584286MW811234OL584265Buryatia
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi22FRMW785869OL584287MW811236OL584264Buryatia
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi23FRMW785870OL584288MW811235OL584263Buryatia
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi24FRMW785871OL584289MW811233OL584262Buryatia
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi25FROL457024OL584290OL584303OL584267Omsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi26FROL457025OL584291OL584304OL584268Omsk
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi27FROL457026OL584292OL584305OL584269Omsk
*—Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, Bodaibinskiy district, vicinity of Bodaybo town, 01–02.VI.2016, R.V. Yakovlev leg. **—Russia, Buryatia Republic, Pribaikalskiy district, 10 km N of Ulan-Ude city, 51°57′15.92″ N; 107°41′23.62″ E, 15.V.2018, A.V. Filippov leg. ***—Russia, Omsk Oblast, Tarskiy district, 3 km E of Samsonovo vill., 56°58′27.90″ N; 74°24′43.39″ E, 15.V.2021, S.A. Knyazev leg.
Table
Table 2. Variable sites of the studied COI gene fragment among the 30 samples sequenced.
Table 2. Variable sites of the studied COI gene fragment among the 30 samples sequenced.
Taxon/HaplotypeNucleotide Position
4082103271310361400406529
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi/Ah01GTTAACTTC
Callophrys rubi/Cl01ATCTATTTC
Callophrys rubi/Cl02ATCTGTTTC
Callophrys rubi/Cl03ACCTATCTA
Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi × Callophrys rubi/AhCl01ATCTATTCC
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shapoval, N.A.; Yakovlev, R.V.; Kuftina, G.N.; Lukhtanov, V.A.; Knyazev, S.A.; Romanovich, A.E.; Krupitsky, A.V. Identification of Natural Hybrids between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers. Insects 2021, 12, 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121124

AMA Style

Shapoval NA, Yakovlev RV, Kuftina GN, Lukhtanov VA, Knyazev SA, Romanovich AE, Krupitsky AV. Identification of Natural Hybrids between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers. Insects. 2021; 12(12):1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shapoval, Nazar A., Roman V. Yakovlev, Galina N. Kuftina, Vladimir A. Lukhtanov, Svyatoslav A. Knyazev, Anna E. Romanovich, and Anatoly V. Krupitsky. 2021. "Identification of Natural Hybrids between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers" Insects 12, no. 12: 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121124

APA Style

Shapoval, N. A., Yakovlev, R. V., Kuftina, G. N., Lukhtanov, V. A., Knyazev, S. A., Romanovich, A. E., & Krupitsky, A. V. (2021). Identification of Natural Hybrids between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers. Insects, 12(12), 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121124

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop