Next Article in Journal
Practices to Conserve Pollinators and Natural Enemies in Agro-Ecosystems
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Mitogenomic Analysis of Two Cuckoo Bees (Apoidea: Anthophila: Megachilidae) with Phylogenetic Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Drosophila melanogaster Y Chromosome Genes Affect Male Sensitivity to Microbial Infections

by
Gloria Bartolo
,
Leandra O. Gonzalez
,
Anastasia Levitin
and
Mikhail Martchenko Shilman
*
Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute, 535 Watson Drive, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010030
Submission received: 19 December 2020 / Revised: 31 December 2020 / Accepted: 2 January 2021 / Published: 5 January 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This manuscript focuses on the protein-encoding genes of the Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome and their role in immunity. Since their discovery, these genes have mainly been studied for their role(s) in male fertility, such as spermatogenesis. Two previously published papers have linked the polymorphism within the Y chromosome and immunity. Currently, there is no research article to our knowledge that has studied the effect of the individual genes of the Y chromosome on fly immunity. Here, we aim to address the lack of immunity-related knowledge of Y chromosome genes by determining the effect of many of these genes on male sensitivity to microbial infections. We challenged loss-of-function gene mutants with bacterial and fungal pathogens orally and observed any significant fly survival changes. We discovered several genes affecting male sensitivity to both bacterial and fungal infections. While most of the Y chromosome genes were found to reduce sensitivity, we found one gene increases sensitivity to fungal infection. Because several genes were found to increase male sensitivity to microbial infections, inhibitors for such genes could be introduced in areas where fruit flies are pests. Amid declining bee populations, Diptera pollinators could be protected from fungal infections with Y-gene inhibitors.

Abstract

The genders of Drosophila melanogaster vary in their sensitivities to microbial pathogens. While many of the immunity-related genes are located on the X chromosome, the polymorphisms within the Y chromosome were also shown to affect the immunity of flies. In this study, we investigated the necessity of individual genes on the Y chromosome (Y-genes) for male sensitivity to microbes. We identified several Y-genes whose genetic inactivation either increases or decreases the sensitivity of males to gastrointestinal infections with fungal Saccharomyces cerevisiae and bacterial Serratia liquefaciens. Specifically, the loss of function mutations in fly kl-5 and Ppr-Y Y-genes lead to increased and decreased sensitivity of males to fungal challenge, respectively, compared to female sensitivity. In contrast, mutations in Drosophila Pp1-Y1, kl-5, kl-3, Ppr-Y, CCY, and FDY Y-genes lead to increased sensitivity of males to bacterial infection, compared to females. Moreover, while these Y-genes are necessary, the Y chromosome is not sufficient for the sensitivity of males to microbes, since the sensitivity of XXY females to fungal and bacterial challenges was not different from the sensitivity of wild-type female flies, compared to males. This study assigns a new immunity-related function to numerous Y-genes in D. melanogaster.

1. Introduction

When combatting pathogenic infections, Drosophila exhibit sexual dimorphism in innate immune responses and survival [1]. Innate immunity in Drosophila melanogaster is primarily regulated by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) located on the second and third chromosomes [2,3]. AMP synthesis and secretion is controlled by two NF-κB-activating pathways: Imd and Toll [4]. While both pathways function to combat all microbial pathogens and their virulence factors, each pathway primarily fights against specific pathogens. The Imd pathway is primarily induced by Gram-negative bacteria, while the Toll pathway is triggered by the detection of Gram-positive bacteria and fungi. In addition to AMPs, macrophage-like plasmatocytes phagocytize microbial invaders immediately upon infection [4]. Certain pathogenic virulence factors also induce specific mechanisms within Drosophila. The pore-forming toxin of Serratia marcescens causes thinning of gut epithelium via purging of enterocyte cytoplasm, protecting enterocytes by extruding damaged cell components and invading bacteria and/or toxins [5].
Several Drosophila immunity related-genes are located on the X chromosome, including those critical for microbial recognition and signal transduction within Imd and Toll pathways [6]. The Toll pathway is mostly activated by lysine-type peptidoglycan found in most Gram-positive bacterial cell walls and by yeast cell wall components. In contrast, the Imd pathway is primarily activated in response to diaminopimelate-type peptidoglycans found in all Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive Bacillus species. Due to their location in a sex chromosome, the expression of such immunity genes within male and female flies is important, as variance in expression may contribute to the sexual dimorphism in immunity seen during pathogenic infections. Unlike mammals, where females randomly silence one of their X chromosomes to maintain a balance between sexes, Drosophila males increase their single X chromosome expression two-fold [7,8]. Compensation of X chromosome, and subsequently X-linked immunity-related genes, is important as genetic variation within natural populations can expose flies to alleles that act in a sex-specific manner, resulting in sex differences in immune competence [6].
In addition to the X chromosome, the Y chromosome may also contribute to differences in the sensitivity of genders to pathogens. Although essential for male fertility in most Drosophila species [9,10], the Y chromosome lacks sex determination genes [11]. Instead, sex determination relies on X chromosome dosage: X0 and XY flies are male, and XX and XXY flies are females [11,12]. The Y chromosome of D. melanogaster is comprised of the following genes (Y genes): Pp1-Y1, kl-5, PRY, kl-3, kl-2, ARY, Ppr-Y, WDY, FDY, Mst77y (multiple gene copies [13]), Pp1-Y2, ORY, and CCY. Multiple Y- genes (kl-5, PRY, kl-3, kl-2, WDY, ORY, and CCY) are essential and may contribute to fertility [10,14,15]. Although not directly immune-related, the Y chromosome may play a role in the sexual dimorphism of innate immunity. Only the addition of the polymorphic non-transcribed Y chromosomes to isogenic females alters the relative expression of AMPs [16]. Varying Y chromosomes within populations may also alter AMP gene expression, altering flies’ ability to combat bacterial infection [17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Drosophila Rearing

Drosophila melanogaster strains were housed at 25 °C with 12 h light/dark cycles and fed on standard cornmeal–molasses–agar fly medium with yeast flakes. Wild-type experiments were conducted with Oregon-R, selected for their rapid egg-laying ability (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) stock #2376), Drosophila aged 4–5 days. Experiments with Y-gene loss-of-function Drosophila utilized unaged flies at the time of the experiments. Mutants of Y-genes (BDSC #) include: ABO-X2 (XXY females) (790), CCY (61959), FDY (62536), kl-3 (53317), kl-5 (2763), Pp1-Y1 (58098), Pp1-Y2 (57236), Ppr-Y (33882), PRY (58235), and WDY (63650). Mutants of kl-5 were generated by x-ray mutagenesis. For mutants CCY, FDY, Pp1-Y1, Pp1-Y2, and PRY, homozygotes of RNAi targeting the gene of interest were chosen for survival assays. Heterozygotes were chosen for WDY as homozygotes were not present in abundance. For mutants Ppr-Y and kl-3, both heterozygotes and homozygotes were chosen. All ABO-X2 flies are homozygous mutants.

2.2. Drosophila Oral Feeding Survival Assay

Saccharomyces cerevisiae diploid strain YEF473, ATCC® 200,970 [18], and Serratia liquefaciens (ATCC 27592) were used as the infective agent for all Drosophila survival assays. S. cerevisiae was incubated on yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium and S. liquefaciens incubated on Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), both at 30 °C. Overnight cultures were grown in YPD or TSB at 30 °C at 180 rpm for 14–16 h. Flies were infected according to the microbial intestinal infection methods described previously in Nehme, et al. [19] with the following modifications. Drosophila vials were prepared by placing three 25 mm diameter circles of extra-thick Whatman blotting paper (Bio-Rad Laboratories, catalog #1703965) at the bottom of the vials and capping with a foam plug. S. cerevisiae or S. liquefaciens overnight cultures were centrifuged, and the pellets resuspended in 50mM (10%) sucrose solution to a final desired optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.7 OD or 4.6 OD for S. cerevisiae and S. liquefaciens, respectively. OD600 values were converted to cells/mL: for yeast, OD600 of 1.0 corresponds to approximately 107 cells/mL [20]; for bacteria, OD600 values were converted according to McFarland’s scale [21]. Each prepared Drosophila vial contained 2.5 mL of its respective solution (absorbed by the Whatman paper found at the bottom of the vial). Flies were anesthetized by CO2, separated by gender, and placed into the Drosophila vials with ten flies in each vial. Vials were incubated at 30 °C and checked a minimum of twice per day for fly survival.

3. Results

3.1. Y Genes Repress or Contribute to the Sensitivity of Fly Males to Yeast Infection

Sex biases of survival to infections in flies vary from pathogen to pathogen: fungal infection via Candida albicans favors female survival [22], while Beauveria bassiana favors male survival [16,23]. Survival can also depend on the mode of infection, as systemic immunity is driven by the production of AMPs, and intestinal immunity is driven by AMPs and reactive oxygen species [4]. We investigated the male and female sensitivity to microorganisms administered orally, as flies are naturally exposed to pathogens when looking for food. Although a commensal microorganism [24], Saccharomyces cerevisiae is lethal to wild-type flies during continuous oral infection. We observed that males and females are equally sensitive to yeast infection, with a median survival of 71 h for both genders (Figure 1a).
We investigated whether loss of function of Y-genes changes inter-gender sensitivities to S. cerevisiae. Genes omitted in this study include kl-2, ARY, Mst77y, and ORY because these mutant flies could not be propagated. In all the mutant strains, females were wild-type for these genes. The loss of function of kl-5 and Ppr-Y significantly altered gender survival bias during S. cerevisiae infection. Male flies with the mutation in kl-5 became more sensitive to yeast compared to females, resulting in median survival of 56 h, in comparison to a median survival of 73 h of kl-5 mutant females (Figure 1b). Conversely, male Ppr-Y mutants were less sensitive to yeast than female flies, with a median survival of 67 and 55 h, respectively (Figure 1c). No difference in survival sex bias was observed in the other seven gene mutants (Figure 1d–j).
ABO-X2 mutation is known to result in females with XXY genotype [25]. We investigated whether the addition of the Y chromosome to XX females is sufficient to affect the survival bias of genders during S. cerevisiae infection. In the absence of the infection, XXY females’ survival time is significantly less than their male counterparts (37 h difference in median survival; p < 0.0001) (Figure 1K). Notwithstanding the difference in gender longevity, we observed no difference in the survival between XXY female flies and XY male flies, suggesting the Y chromosome is not sufficient to affect the sex bias in survival during S. cerevisiae infection.

3.2. Y Genes Repress the Sensitivity of Fly Males to Bacterial Infection

Although systemic innate immune responses in Drosophila are primarily regulated by Imd and Toll pathways, the Imd pathway regulates the gut immune response in the midgut, the primary site of digestion and absorption [4]. Additionally, while S. cerevisiae is recognized by Toll pathway, the Imd pathway primarily recognizes Gram-negative bacteria. Unlike S. cerevisiae infection, there is a sex bias during oral infection of Serratia liquefaciens, a Gram-negative bacterium. Wild-type male flies exhibit greater overall survival, with a median survival of 127 h, than the median survival of 93 h for females (Figure 2a).
Loss of function of several Y-genes altered the survival bias of male and female flies during S. liquefaciens infection. Specifically, mutations in Pp1-Y1 and kl-3 resulted in males becoming more sensitive than their respective females. Male Pp1-Y1 mutant flies exhibit a significantly shorter median survival time of 93 h than the median female survival of 130 h (Figure 2b). A similar trend is seen in kl-3 mutant flies, with median survival times of 96 and 144 h for males and females, respectively (Figure 2c). Additional Y-genes also affecting male sensitivity were kl-5, Pp1-Y2, Ppr-Y, CCY, and FDY. The loss of function in these genes leads to an increased male sensitivity such that no significant gender difference in median survival was observed (Figure 2d–g).
In contrast, WDY and PRY appear to not be immunity-related during oral S. liquefaciens infection, as the loss of function in these genes did not affect male sensitivity compared to females: similar to wild-type, the median male survival is 20 h greater than median female survival (Figure 2h–i). Additionally, ABO-X2 XXY females also have reduced median survival compared to males, suggesting the presence of the Y chromosome is not sufficient to affect the sex bias in survival during S. liquefaciens infection (Figure 2j).

4. Discussion

Here, we observe several Y-genes to have immunity-related functions. Very little is known about the function of Y-genes, with most functions described as fertility-related [23]. All D. melanogaster Y-genes (excluding Mst77y) have at least one convincing paralog (Table 1). The function of Y-genes and their paralogs are not known to be immunity-related. We propose the paralogs of Pp1-Y1, kl-5, kl-3, Ppr-Y, FDY, and CCY may also have immunity-related functions in flies during yeast and bacterial infections. Further studies need to be completed to determine how these genes contribute to flies’ immunity. Such studies may elucidate the function(s) and the evolution of D. melanogaster Y-genes.
Low conservation across Y-chromosomes exists across Drosophila species. Most of the D. melanogaster Y-genes are conserved in other Drosophila species but not necessarily on the Y chromosome [9]. For example, in D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura, all Y-genes are encoded by the autosome [26]. Whether located on the Y chromosome or the autosome, we predict Y-genes of other Drosophila species to have a similar impact on survival to microbial infections as we observed here. If true, in species where Y-genes are encoded by the autosomal chromosomes, their effect on survival may no longer be male-specific. Furthermore, the effect of FDY in male sensitivity to S. liquefaciens should not be seen in other Drosophila species since FDY is exclusive to D. melanogaster [27].
Human orthologs of D. melanogaster Y-genes appear to be housekeeping genes (Table 1). While some human orthologs have very similar functions to fly Y-genes (protein phosphatases and dynein heavy chains), others possess more human-specific functions or are associated with human diseases (SERBP1 and CFAP58). All orthologs, except for DRC3 (a homolog for fly Ppr-Y), express mRNA in most major human tissues, where each gene is uniquely overexpressed in specific tissues [28]. PPP1CA, DNAH17, DNAH5, DNAH8, SERBP1, and CTTNBP2 proteins are overexpressed in lymph nodes, CD8+ T cells, B-lymphocytes, neutrophils, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and monocytes, respectively. This further supports the role of these genes and their Y-gene homologs’ role in host immunity (Figure 3).
Previously, the function of many of Y-genes was only known to be fertility-related. Pp1-Y1, Pp1-Y2, and Ppr-Y belong to the phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) family, evolutionarily conserved enzymes responsible for dephosphorylating the serine and threonine protein residues [26]. Ppr-Y is similar to a dynein light chain component of Chlamydomonas flagella [29]. PRY has domain homology to polycystins linked to sperm storage and fertilization [14]. Disruption in kl-2, kl-3, and kl-5 results in loss of outer dynein arm of sperm tail axoneme, essential for male fertility [10]. WDY contains three WD40 domains, important for various functions, including adaptor/regulatory modules in signal transduction, pre-mRNA processing, and cytoskeleton assembly [14,15]. ORY is similar to occludin, a membrane protein in mice [29]. Other than their fertility role, the functions of PRY, ARY, FDY, and CCY are unknown [23]. Our study shows that the disruption of any of the Pp1-Y1, kl-5, kl-3, Ppr-Y, FDY, and CCY genes lead to the increased sensitivity of males to bacterial infection, which suggests that the protein products of these genes are members of the same pathway. More studies are needed to determine whether these Y-genes form an immunity-related pathway.
It has previously been shown that XXY mutant females do not express Y-genes [16,30]. Although the presence of a polymorphic Y-chromosome alone can increase the expression of several AMP genes within XXY females [16], there does not appear to be varying immune gene expression or functional immune response to bacterial infections of XXY females carrying Y-chromosomes from a single population [17]. Interestingly, males with varying Y-chromosomes do express significant immune response, which is significantly correlated to increased survival time to systemic Serratia infection. Here, we observed the presence of Y-chromosome not to affect XXY female survival to microbial infection. This may be due to the lack of expression of Y-genes in our XXY females or due to our use of oral infection where Drosophila gut immunity is primarily activated.
Natural oral infections of S. cerevisiae can be fatal for Drosophila and other insects and are used as a biopesticide in agriculture [31,32]. Pathogenic infections of yeast are dependent on fly fitness, as S. cerevisiae is also a commensal microorganism to Drosophila. To further enhance yeast effectiveness towards fruit flies, it could be possible to inhibit kl-5 to increase male susceptibility by introducing kl-5 inhibitors. Since kl-5 and Ppr-Y do not share close homology, kl-5 inhibitors should not inhibit Ppr-Y. Similarly, introducing loss of function kl-5 mutants into the wild population may achieve a similar effect. Additionally, fly mutants with loss of function in Pp1-Y1, kl-5, kl-3, Ppr-Y, CCY, and FDY can also be introduced into agricultural crop populations whose microbiota includes S. liquefaciens [33,34]. Male progeny of such fly mutants should also inherit the loss of function in the respective Y-gene and thus be more susceptible to entomopathogenic microbes.

5. Conclusions

This study hypothesizes that there are Y-genes that affect male sensitivity to microbes. While previous studies showed that the polymorphisms within the Y chromosome were sufficient to affect the host sensitivity, this study investigates the necessity of individual Y-genes for male sensitivity to microbes. We identified several Y genes whose genetic inactivation either increases or decreases the sensitivity of males to gastrointestinal fungal and bacterial infections. Moreover, the addition of the Y chromosome to females was not sufficient for the sexual dimorphism in the sensitivity to oral microbial infections. This study identifies the immune-related function of Y genes in D. melanogaster.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.S. and A.L.; methodology, G.B. and L.O.G.; validation, G.B. and L.O.G.; formal analysis, all; investigation, G.B. and L.O.G.; resources, M.M.S. and A.L.; data curation, M.M.S. and A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B. and M.M.S.; writing—review and editing, all; supervision, M.M.S. and A.L.; project administration, M.M.S. and A.L.; funding acquisition, M.M.S. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center through the KL2 Mentored Career Development Award Program of the Inland California Translational Consortium (GR720001). The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

M.M.S. acknowledges support from the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center through the KL2 Mentored Career Development Award Program of the Inland California Translational Consortium (GR720001). A.L. acknowledges support from The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belmonte, R.L.; Corbally, M.K.; Duneau, D.F.; Regan, J.C. Sexual Dimorphisms in Innate Immunity and Responses to Infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hanson, M.A.; Dostalova, A.; Ceroni, C.; Poidevin, M.; Kondo, S.; Lemaitre, B. Correction: Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach. Elife 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tryselius, Y.; Samakovlis, C.; Kimbrell, D.A.; Hultmark, D. CecC, a cecropin gene expressed during metamorphosis in Drosophila pupae. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992, 204, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Buchon, N.; Silverman, N.; Cherry, S. Immunity in Drosophila melanogaster--from microbial recognition to whole-organism physiology. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 796–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, K.Z.; Lestradet, M.; Socha, C.; Schirmeier, S.; Schmitz, A.; Spenle, C.; Lefebvre, O.; Keime, C.; Yamba, W.M.; Bou Aoun, R.; et al. Enterocyte Purge and Rapid Recovery Is a Resilience Reaction of the Gut Epithelium to Pore-Forming Toxin Attack. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 716–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hill-Burns, E.M.; Clark, A.G. X-linked variation in immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2009, 183, 1477–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Menon, D.U.; Meller, V.H. Identification of the Drosophila X chromosome: The long and short of it. RNA Biol. 2015, 12, 1088–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Philip, P.; Stenberg, P. Male X-linked genes in Drosophila melanogaster are compensated independently of the Male-Specific Lethal complex. Epigenet. Chromatin 2013, 6, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Koerich, L.B.; Wang, X.; Clark, A.G.; Carvalho, A.B. Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome. Nature 2008, 456, 949–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, J.; Luo, J.; Chen, J.; Dai, J.; Montell, C. The Role of Y Chromosome Genes in Male Fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2020, 215, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malone, J.H.; Oliver, B. The sex chromosome that refused to die. Bioessays 2008, 30, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Salz, H.K.; Erickson, J.W. Sex determination in Drosophila: The view from the top. Fly 2010, 4, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Krsticevic, F.J.; Schrago, C.G.; Carvalho, A.B. Long-Read Single Molecule Sequencing to Resolve Tandem Gene Copies: The Mst77Y Region on the Drosophila melanogaster Y Chromosome. G3 (Bethesda) 2015, 5, 1145–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hafezi, Y.; Sruba, S.R.; Tarrash, S.R.; Wolfner, M.F.; Clark, A.G. Dissecting Fertility Functions of Drosophila Y Chromosome Genes with CRISPR. Genetics 2020, 214, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vibranovski, M.D.; Koerich, L.B.; Carvalho, A.B. Two new Y-linked genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2008, 179, 2325–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lemos, B.; Branco, A.T.; Hartl, D.L. Epigenetic effects of polymorphic Y chromosomes modulate chromatin components, immune response, and sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15826–15831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kutch, I.C.; Fedorka, K.M. Y-linked variation for autosomal immune gene regulation has the potential to shape sexually dimorphic immunity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20151301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bi, E.; Pringle, J.R. ZDS1 and ZDS2, genes whose products may regulate Cdc42p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16, 5264–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nehme, N.T.; Liegeois, S.; Kele, B.; Giammarinaro, P.; Pradel, E.; Hoffmann, J.A.; Ewbank, J.J.; Ferrandon, D. A model of bacterial intestinal infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Groves, J.D.; Falson, P.; le Maire, M.; Tanner, M.J. Functional cell surface expression of the anion transport domain of human red cell band 3 (AE1) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 12245–12250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. McFarland, J. The nephelometer: An instrument for estimating the number of bacteria in suspensions used for calculating the opsonic index and for vaccines. J. Am. Med Assoc. 1907, XLIX, 1176–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chowdhury, M.; Li, C.F.; He, Z.; Lu, Y.; Liu, X.S.; Wang, Y.F.; Ip, Y.T.; Strand, M.R.; Yu, X.Q. Toll family members bind multiple Spatzle proteins and activate antimicrobial peptide gene expression in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 10172–10181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marsano, R.M.; Giordano, E.; Messina, G.; Dimitri, P. A New Portrait of Constitutive Heterochromatin: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster. Trends Genet. 2019, 35, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Madden, A.A.; Epps, M.J.; Fukami, T.; Irwin, R.E.; Sheppard, J.; Sorger, D.M.; Dunn, R.R. The ecology of insect-yeast relationships and its relevance to human industry. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2018, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tomkiel, J.; Pimpinelli, S.; Sandler, L. Rescue from the abnormal oocyte maternal-effect lethality by ABO heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1991, 128, 583–594. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miskei, M.; Adam, C.; Kovacs, L.; Karanyi, Z.; Dombradi, V. Molecular evolution of phosphoprotein phosphatases in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Carvalho, A.B.; Vicoso, B.; Russo, C.A.; Swenor, B.; Clark, A.G. Birth of a new gene on the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 12450–12455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Stelzer, G.; Rosen, N.; Plaschkes, I.; Zimmerman, S.; Twik, M.; Fishilevich, S.; Stein, T.I.; Nudel, R.; Lieder, I.; Mazor, Y.; et al. The GeneCards Suite: From Gene Data Mining to Disease Genome Sequence Analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2016, 54, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carvalho, A.B.; Dobo, B.A.; Vibranovski, M.D.; Clark, A.G. Identification of five new genes on the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13225–13230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Adám, C.; Henn, L.; Miskei, M.; Erdélyi, M.; Friedrich, P.; Dombrádi, V. Conservation of male-specific expression of novel phosphoprotein phosphatases in Drosoph. Dev. Genes Evol. 2010, 220, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bartolo, G.; Gonzalez, L.O.; Alameh, S.; Valencia, C.A.; Martchenko Shilman, M. Identification of glucocorticoid receptor in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Freimoser, F.M.; Rueda-Mejia, M.P.; Tilocca, B.; Migheli, Q. Biocontrol yeasts: Mechanisms and applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Grimont, P.A.D.; Grimont, F.; Starr, M.P. Serratia species isolated from plants. Curr. Microbiol. 1981, 5, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nascimento, F.; Vicente, C.; Cock, P.; Tavares, M.; Rossi, M.; Hasegawa, K.; Mota, M. From plants to nematodes: Serratia grimesii BXF1 genome reveals an adaptation to the modulation of multi-species interactions. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of loss of function of Y-genes or gain of Y chromosome on the sensitivity of fly survival to yeast infection. Wild-type (WT), loss of function Y-mutant males and XXY females (ABO-X2) were orally exposed to a 50 mM sucrose solution containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For experiments with wild-type flies, Oregon-R strain was used (a). For mutant fly strain experiments involving loss of function of Y-genes, females are wild-type (bj). In the case of XXY females, males are wild-type (k). Each condition contains ten flies. Vials are incubated at 30 °C and checked a minimum of twice per day for fly survival (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Figure 1. Effects of loss of function of Y-genes or gain of Y chromosome on the sensitivity of fly survival to yeast infection. Wild-type (WT), loss of function Y-mutant males and XXY females (ABO-X2) were orally exposed to a 50 mM sucrose solution containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For experiments with wild-type flies, Oregon-R strain was used (a). For mutant fly strain experiments involving loss of function of Y-genes, females are wild-type (bj). In the case of XXY females, males are wild-type (k). Each condition contains ten flies. Vials are incubated at 30 °C and checked a minimum of twice per day for fly survival (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Insects 12 00030 g001aInsects 12 00030 g001b
Figure 2. Loss of function of multiple Y-genes increase the sensitivity of males to bacterial infection. Wild-type (WT), loss of function Y-mutant males and XXY females (ABO-X2) were orally exposed to a 50 mM sucrose solution containing Serratia liquefaciens. For experiments with wild-type flies, Oregon-R strain was used (a). For mutant fly strain experiments involving loss of function of Y-genes, females are wild-type (bj). In the case of XXY females, males are wild-type (k). Each condition contains ten flies. Vials are incubated at 30 °C and checked a minimum of twice per day for fly survival (**, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001).
Figure 2. Loss of function of multiple Y-genes increase the sensitivity of males to bacterial infection. Wild-type (WT), loss of function Y-mutant males and XXY females (ABO-X2) were orally exposed to a 50 mM sucrose solution containing Serratia liquefaciens. For experiments with wild-type flies, Oregon-R strain was used (a). For mutant fly strain experiments involving loss of function of Y-genes, females are wild-type (bj). In the case of XXY females, males are wild-type (k). Each condition contains ten flies. Vials are incubated at 30 °C and checked a minimum of twice per day for fly survival (**, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001).
Insects 12 00030 g002aInsects 12 00030 g002b
Figure 3. Genes of Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome and their role in immunity. The Y chromosome of D. melanogaster consists of 12 single-copy protein-encoding genes. Loss of function of genes in bold were studied during fungal and bacterial oral infection assays. During Saccharomyces cerevisiae challenge, kl-5 and Ppr-Y decrease and increase the sensitivity of male flies to infection, respectively. Pp1-Y1, kl-5, kl-3, Ppr-Y, CCY, and FDY were found to decrease male sensitivity to Serratia liquefaciens oral infection.
Figure 3. Genes of Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome and their role in immunity. The Y chromosome of D. melanogaster consists of 12 single-copy protein-encoding genes. Loss of function of genes in bold were studied during fungal and bacterial oral infection assays. During Saccharomyces cerevisiae challenge, kl-5 and Ppr-Y decrease and increase the sensitivity of male flies to infection, respectively. Pp1-Y1, kl-5, kl-3, Ppr-Y, CCY, and FDY were found to decrease male sensitivity to Serratia liquefaciens oral infection.
Insects 12 00030 g003
Table 1. Paralogs and orthologs of Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome genes. For fly and human genes, the percentage of identities and similarity to Y-genes is shown, as well as gene function.
Table 1. Paralogs and orthologs of Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome genes. For fly and human genes, the percentage of identities and similarity to Y-genes is shown, as well as gene function.
D. melanogaster
Y-Genes
D. melanogaster Paralog(s)H. sapiens Ortholog(s)
Gene Name(s)
(Identity %/Similarity %)
Gene Function(s)Gene Name(s)
(Identity %/Similarity %)
Gene Function(s)
Pp1-Y1:
Protein phosphatase 1,
Y-linked 1
Pp1-Y2 [63/75]
flapwing [60/76]
Pp1α-96A [60/75]
Pp1-13C [59/76]
Pp1-87B [59/75]
Protein
serine/threonine
phosphatase activity
Protein Phosphatase 1
Catalytic Subunits α, β, γ
PPP1CA [57/74]
PPP1CB [59/74]
PPP1CC [59/75]
Serine/threonine
protein phosphatase; glycogen metabolism, muscle contractibility, protein synthesis
kl-5:
male fertility
factor kl5
Dynein heavy chain Dhc93AB [61/76]Ciliary and flagellar motor proteinsDynein Axonemal
Heavy Chain 9
DNAH9 [58/74]
Force generating
protein of respiratory cilia
CG3339 [55/71]UnknownDynein Axonemal
Heavy Chain 17
DNAH17 [59/75]
Force generating
protein in sperm
flagellum
PRY:
polycystine-related-Y
CG30048 [26/44]UnknownPolycystin 1 Like 3,
Transient Receptor
Potential Channel
Interacting
PKD1L3 [20/36]
Calcium channel
component
CG42685 [24/42]Predicted calcium channel activity
kl-3:
male fertility factor kl3
CG9492 [52/69]UnknownDynein Axonemal
Heavy Chain 5
DNAH5 [51/69]
Force generating
protein of respiratory cilia
Dynein heavy chain
Dhc93AB [32/52]
Dhc36C [32/51]
Ciliary and flagellar motor proteinsDynein Axonemal
Heavy Chain 8
DNAH8 [50/68]
Force generating
protein in sperm
flagellum
kl-2:
male fertility factor kl2
Dynein heavy chain
Dhc36C [35/54]
Dhc16F [35/55]
Ciliary and flagellar motor proteinsDynein Axonemal
Heavy Chain 2
DNAH5 [33/53]
Force generating
protein of respiratory cilia and in sperm
flagellum
ARY:
Aldehyde reductase Y
CG10638 [49/67]UnknownAldo-Keto Reductase
Family 1 Member B10
AKR1B10 [40/61]
Catalyzes Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate NADPH-dependent reduction
Akr1B [40/59]Aldo-keto reductase 1B
PPr-YTbCMF46 [61/80]UnknownDynein Regulatory
Complex Subunit 3
DRC3 [31/51]
Key regulator of
ciliary and flagellar
motility
WDY
WD40 Y
CG34164 [60/73]UnknownEF-Hand Calcium
Binding Domain 8
EFCAB8 [23/39]
Calcium ion binding
FDY:
flagrante delicto
vig2 [93/94]heterochromatin
organization, histone H3-K9 methylation and chromatin
silencing regulation
Serpin Family E
Member 1
SERBP1 [44/62]
inhibitor of
fibrinolysis
Hyaluronan Binding
Protein 4
HABP4 [33/50]
Regulates
transcription, pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA translation
Pp1-Y2:
Protein phosphatase 1,
Y-linked 2
Pp1α-96A [75/88]
Flw [76/89]
Pp1-87B [74/87]
Pp1-13C [73/86]
Pp1-Y1 [63/75]
Protein
serine/threonine
phosphatase activity
Protein Phosphatase 1
Catalytic Subunits α, β, γ
PPP1CA [57/74]
PPP1CB [59/74]
PPP1CC [59/75]
Serine/threonine
protein phosphatase;
glycogen metabolism, muscle contractility, protein synthesis
ORY:
Occludin-Related Y
CG6059 [34/58]
CG5882 [26/51]
UnknownCilia and Flagella
Associated Protein 58
CFAP58 [29/54]
Associated with
melanoma
CCY:
Coiled-Coils Y
CG31161 [52/71]UnknownCortactin-binding protein 2 isoform X7
CTTNBP2 [24/48]
Interacts with a
central regulator of the actin cytoskeleton
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bartolo, G.; Gonzalez, L.O.; Levitin, A.; Martchenko Shilman, M. Drosophila melanogaster Y Chromosome Genes Affect Male Sensitivity to Microbial Infections. Insects 2021, 12, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010030

AMA Style

Bartolo G, Gonzalez LO, Levitin A, Martchenko Shilman M. Drosophila melanogaster Y Chromosome Genes Affect Male Sensitivity to Microbial Infections. Insects. 2021; 12(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bartolo, Gloria, Leandra O. Gonzalez, Anastasia Levitin, and Mikhail Martchenko Shilman. 2021. "Drosophila melanogaster Y Chromosome Genes Affect Male Sensitivity to Microbial Infections" Insects 12, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop