Next Article in Journal
1PN Effective Binary Lagrangian for the Gravity–Kalb–Ramond Sector in the Conservative Regime
Previous Article in Journal
Mass Loss in Be Stars: News from Two Fronts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unveiling the Evolution of MWC 728: Non-Conservative Mass Transfer in an FS CMa Binary

by
Nadezhda L. Vaidman
1,2,
Serik A. Khokhlov
1,* and
Aldiyar T. Agishev
1
1
Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
2
Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute, Observatory, 23, Almaty 050020, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2025, 13(4), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13040078
Submission received: 20 May 2025 / Revised: 9 June 2025 / Accepted: 30 June 2025 / Published: 7 July 2025

Abstract

We combine corrected Gaia DR3 astrometry with non-conservative MESA modelling to retrace the evolution of the FS-CMa binary MWC 728. The revised parallax sets the distance at d = 1.2 ± 0.1 kpc, leading—after Monte-Carlo error propagation—to luminosities of log ( L / L ) acc = 2.6 ± 0.1 and log ( L / L ) don = 1.5 ± 0.1 , corresponding to the accretor and donor, respectively. A fiducial binary track that starts with M don = 3.6 ± 0.1 M , M acc = 1.8 ± 0.1 M , and P 0 = 21.0 ± 0.2 d reproduces the observations provided the Roche-lobe overflow, which is moderately non-conservative: only 39 % of the transferred mass is retained by the accretor, while the remainder leaves the system via (i) a fast isotropic wind from the donor ( α = 0.01 ), (ii) isotropic re-emission near the accretor ( β = 0.45 ), and (iii) outflow into a circumbinary torus ( δ = 0.15 , lever arm γ = 1.3 ). These channels remove sufficient angular momentum to expand the orbit to the observed P obs = 27.5 ± 0.1 d while sustaining the dusty circumbinary outflow. At t 223 Myr, the model matches every current observable: M don = 1.30 ± 0.05 M , M acc = 2.67 ± 0.05 M , mass ratio q = 2.0 ± 0.1 , and an ongoing transfer rate of M ˙ ( 1 ± 0.3 ) × 10 6 M yr 1 . MWC 728 thus serves as a benchmark intermediate-mass binary for testing how non-conservative outflows regulate angular-momentum loss and orbital growth.

1. Introduction

B[e] stars are B-type objects that show both forbidden emission lines and a strong infrared excess, the latter arising from a compact gaseous-and-dusty envelope. Such envelopes are often linked to ongoing or recent mass transfer in binary systems, as demonstrated for FS CMa-type objects by Miroshnichenko et al. [1]. Using these two observables as a definition, Lamers et al. [2] subsequently identified four evolutionary subgroups: supergiants (sgB[e]), pre-main-sequence Herbig Ae/Be stars (HAeB[e]), compact planetary nebulae (cPNB[e]), and symbiotic systems (SymB[e]).
A particularly coherent subset of B[e] stars was singled out by [3] and is now referred to as the FS CMa group. Its members are mid-B to early-A objects situated well away from star-forming regions. Spectroscopically they combine extreme Balmer and [OI] emission with a warm-dust continuum that peaks at 10–30  μ m. About one-third of the current list of stars also show faint metallic absorptions from a cooler companion. The class is anchored by FS CMa itself and includes the X-ray transient CI Cam [4], the shell star HD 50138 [5], and the long-period binary system AS 386 [6]. Radio and mid-IR diagnostics imply mass loss rates of 10 6 10 5 M yr 1 , two orders of magnitude above what the radiative winds of single B-stars can supply. Current explanations therefore invoke binary interaction: highly non-conservative case-B transfer [7], post-common-envelope or merger products [8], or magnetically channelled outflows launched after a merger [9].
Originally identified as an emission-line star by Merrill and Burwell [10], MWC 728 was subsequently classified as an FS CMa object by Miroshnichenko [3]. Long-term high-resolution spectroscopy revealed a 27.5-day binary comprising a B7V primary and a G-type secondary [11], while multi-epoch photometry and interferometry document a dusty, variable circumbinary environment. These properties make MWC 728 an ideal subject for testing evolutionary pathways proposed for the FS CMa phenomenon.

2. Fundamental Parameters of the System

We re-evaluated the fundamental properties of MWC 728 using the most recent astrometric, photometric, and dust-mapping data. A Gaia DR3 parallax of 3.31 ± 0.28 mas [12] corresponds, according to the catalogue of the Gaia Collaboration et al. [13], to d = 309 22 + 27 pc, but the same solution has a renormalised unit-weight error of RUWE = 9.74 . Such large values are typical for objects with an extended or non-axisymmetric light distribution (e.g., a disc or envelope) and/or unresolved multiplicity [14], making the single-star fit unreliable. An independent spectrophotometric study by Miroshnichenko et al. [11] gave a considerably larger distance, d 1.0 ± 0.2 kpc, while evolutionary models of the system likewise favour d 1.0 kpc. Inflating the formal parallax uncertainty using the empirical factor proposed by El-Badry [15], specifically f 3.50 for the Gaia DR3, with an RUWE = 9.74 and an adopted apparent magnitude of MWC 728 ( V 9.8 mag), and recomputing the posterior under the exponentially decreasing space density prior of the Gaia Collaboration et al. [13] moves the peak of the posterior distribution to d = 1.2 ± 0.1 kpc.
Interstellar reddening along the sight line ( l = 162 . 3 , b = 19 . 6 ) was obtained from the Bayestar 3D dust map [16]. At d 1.20 kpc, this map gives E ( B V ) = 0.23 ± 0.01 mag, corresponding to A V = 0.71 ± 0.04 mag for R V = 3.1 .
Following the spectral decomposition carried out by Miroshnichenko et al. [11], we adopt the fractional V-band flux contributions Φ acc = 0.60 ± 0.05 , Φ don = 0.10 ± 0.01 , and Φ disk = 0.30 ± 0.05 for the donor (we consider mass transfer from the initially more massive, or “donor,” component onto the initially less massive, or “accretor,” component; hence the terms primary (≡donor) and secondary (≡accretor) are used interchangeably), accretor, and circumbinary disc, respectively. Each coefficient is defined as Φ i F i / F tot , where F i is the continuum flux of component i and F tot is the total continuum flux of the system at λ 5500 Å (central wavelength of the V band) used in the decomposition. Bolometric corrections are taken from the updated scale of Pecaut and Mamajek [17]: BC V ( accretor ) = 1.10 ± 0.05 mag and BC V ( donor ) = 0.29 ± 0.06 mag.
Taking into account the distance, extinction, and fixed split of the flux, after bolometric correction, we obtained M bol acc = 1.85 ± 0.22 mag and M bol don = 0.98 ± 0.46 mag, i.e., log ( L / L ) acc = 2.63 ± 0.09 and log ( L / L ) don = 1.53 ± 0.09 , respectively (Figure 1).
The corresponding radii of the components are R acc = 3.5 ± 0.4 R and R don = 7.8 ± 1.0 R (Table 1). All input quantities (d, A V , V tot , flux fractions, and BC V ) were modelled as independent Gaussians; uncertainties came from a 5000-cycle Monte-Carlo propagation.

3. Method and Numerical Input

We computed detailed binary evolution models for MWC 728 with the MESA code (version 24.05.1; [18,19,20,21,22,23]) on a multicore, multiprocessor server at the Laboratory of Astrophysics of the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Research Center (https://astro.kaznu.info/Computingcluster.html) “Data Science in Astrophysics” (accessed on 17 May 2025). The MESA code allows modelling of interacting B[e] binaries (e.g., HD 327083 [24]). Using the fundamental parameters derived in Section 2 as starting constraints, we explored a grid in which the initial orbital period was varied from 5.0 to 30.0 days, while the zero-age donor and accretor masses were increased from 4 to 7 M and from 1 to 3 M , respectively.
We adopted a near-solar metallicity of Z = 0.014 [25]. Mass loss was treated with the standard MESA scheme that combines the line-driven formulation of Vink et al. [26] for hot stars ( T eff 10 4 K ) and the formulation of de Jager et al. [27] once the temperature falls below 8000 K . Following recent evidence that canonical rates tend to be overestimated in the B-type and cool supergiant regimes, e.g., [28,29], we applied a uniform reduction factor, α wind = 0.5 . α wind , which corresponds to the Vink_scaling_factor and de_Jager_scaling_factor in MESA, which scale the mass loss rates of the two formulations. See the MESA documentation (https://docs.mesastar.org/en/latest/) (accessed on 17 May 2025). This value halves the theoretical rates, reflecting the moderate winds typically inferred for FS CMa objects while still allowing for episodes of enhanced outflow reported in some systems [30,31]. Because our focus is on the effects of non-conservative Roche-lobe overflow, α wind was kept fixed throughout the grid rather than being treated as a free parameter.
For the mass-transfer phase, we adopt the Kolb implementation of the [32] formalism (mdot_scheme = ‘Kolb’). This scheme integrates the hydrostatic density profile above the donor’s photosphere, giving the exponential response of the mass loss rate to the degree of overfill of the Roche lobe. Compared with the original Ritter formulation, the Kolb variant (i) removes the formal discontinuity that appears when the stellar radius approaches the Roche-lobe radius and (ii) remains numerically stable during the τ KH 10 5 yr donor’s Kelvin–Helmholtz adjustment phase [33]. We compute the Roche radius with the Eggleton formula [34] and keep the default photospheric scale-height factor. No Kelvin–Helmholtz timestep limiter is imposed, which allows MESA to resolve the full thermal-timescale episode without artificial suppression. Exploratory runs performed with the Ritter [35] and implicit options occasionally produced under-resolved M ˙ spikes or premature contact for initial donor masses of M d o n 5 M . Although these artefacts vanish when the global timestep is reduced by two orders of magnitude, such fine gridding renders large parameter surveys computationally prohibitive. The Kolb choice avoids this issue without additional fine-tuning and was therefore retained throughout our model grid.
We treat mass and angular-momentum losses with the α β δ formulation of Soberman et al. [33], as implemented in MESA [20]. In this formalism,
α 
is the fraction of the transferred mass removed as isotropic wind from the donor;
β 
is the fraction isotropically re-emitted near the accretor (hot boundary layer and L 2 / L 3 outflow);
δ 
is the fraction fed into a circumbinary torus located at R tor = γ a , where a is the instantaneous orbital separation of the binary, carrying a specific angular momentum of j tor = γ j orb ;
ηacc 
is the mass-accretion efficiency: the fraction of the transferred mass that is effectively accreted by the secondary (accretor), computed as η acc = 1 α β δ [33].
The four channels are set in the inlist via mass_transfer_alpha, mass_transfer_beta, mass_transfer_delta, and mass_transfer_gamma. For MWC 728, we adopt
α = 0.01 , β = 0.45 , δ = 0.15 , γ = 1.3 ,
so that η acc = 0.39 . This choice is motivated by three empirical and theoretical considerations:
  • Donor wind (α). Two regimes imposed boundaries on the expected isotropic wind from the Roche-filling star.
    (i) When the donor was a B7-type star, the Vink formulation predicted that M ˙ w i n d Vink 2 × 10 9 M yr 1 [26], i.e., α 3 × 10 4 relative to the peak mass-transfer rate adopted in the grid.
    (ii) After the Algol reversal, the donor was an F-type subgiant; a Reimers-style scaling gave an even weaker M ˙ w i n d Reimers 10 11 M yr 1 [36], implying α 10 5 .
    Both limits lie well below the non-spherical channels ( β , δ ), so we adopt a single constant value, α = 0.01 . Tests with α = 0 –0.03 change the orbital period by < 1 % , confirming its negligible effect.
  • Re-emission from the gainer (β). Three-dimensional simulations show that gainers rotating at v rot 0.8 v crit re-emit 40– 60 % of the incident stream [37]. For the accretor with M acc = 1.8 M and R acc = 3.5 R , the Roche-corrected expression gives v crit 3.3 × 10 2 km s 1 . The observed projected rotation velocity is v sin i 110 km s 1 , and with the binary inclination i = 14 ± 1 [11], the equatorial (true) rotation speed, obtained via v rot = ( v sin i ) / sin i , is v rot ( 1.0 ± 0.1 ) v crit . This places the accretor well within the simulated high-rotation regime, so we adopt the representative value β = 0.45 .
  • Circumbinary torus (δ, γ). The SED of MWC 728 shows a smooth, featureless infrared excess and exceeds the combined stellar photospheres by more than an order of magnitude [11]. Free–free emission from a Be-type envelope cannot reproduce such a broad hump, whereas radiative-transfer models with a warm, optically thick circumbinary dust reservoir match both the slope and the absolute flux level [38]. SPH calculations that include dust formation further show that 10–20% of the transferred mass can settle into a long-lived torus at R tor 1 2 au [39]. For MWC 728, the observed IR luminosity is reproduced for δ = 0.12 –0.18 and a lever-arm factor of γ = R tor / a 1.3 .
The minimum dynamically stable torus radius is R tor 1.3 a [40]. With the current mass ratio q now = M acc , now / M don , now = 2.00 , we take the specific angular momentum of the escaping material to be
j tor = γ j orb
so that the fractional angular-momentum loss carried away by the torus is
J ˙ tor J orb = ( 1 + q ) δ γ M ˙ tr M don
This mechanism lengthens the orbital period from the contact value P c = 21.0  d to the observed value P obs = 27.5 ± 0.1  d within 1 σ . Exploratory runs show that γ > 1.5 or δ < 0.10 under-estimate the period and the infrared excess, whereas δ > 0.25 over-extends the period and suppresses the peak accretion rate. Values in the range δ 0.10 –0.20 reproduce both the orbital period and the IR luminosity, while the stellar HR tracks remain virtually unchanged (deviations 0.02  dex) across this δ interval. We therefore adopt δ = 0.15 and γ = 1.3 .
We include tidal interactions via MESA’s binary-tide module. Equilibrium tides in convective envelopes follow the constant-viscosity formalism of Hut [41], whereas radiative damping in radiative envelopes is treated in accordance with Zahn [42,43]. The resulting tidal torque is two orders of magnitude weaker than the wind-driven angular-momentum loss before contact and therefore has a negligible impact on the pre-Roche-lobe period evolution.
We model convective energy transport with the standard mixing-length formalism of Böhm-Vitense [44]. We keep the solar-calibrated value mixing_length_alpha = 1.84 [45]. Convective core growth is treated with the exponential–diffusive formalism of Herwig [46] (overshoot_scheme = ‘exponential’). We adopt overshoot_f = 0.014 and overshoot_f0 = 0.002, which correspond to an e-folding length of 0.20 H P at the convective boundary. This choice is guided by eclipsing binary calibrations in the 2–5  M range [47] and lies well within the empirically supported interval f ov = 0.010 0.016 for intermediate-mass stars.

4. Results

The evolutionary models were computed in two stages. First, a coarse grid ( Δ M = 0.5 M , Δ P 0 = 1 d ) was constructed, imposing only the condition M d o n > M a c c . Models matching the observed constraints—orbital period, mass function, mass ratio, luminosities, effective temperatures, and stellar radii (Section 2)—clustered near M d o n 3.2 3.8 M , M a c c 1.6 2.0 M , and P 0 15 –30 d.
Subsequently, a fine grid ( Δ M = 0.1 M , Δ P 0 = 0.1 d ) was developed over this parameter space. Filtering by the same observables significantly narrowed down the solutions. The optimal initial configuration was M d o n = 3.6 M , M a c c = 1.8 M , and P 0 = 21.0 d . This model is thus adopted as the fiducial evolutionary track for MWC 728.
Having fixed the initial conditions, we now follow the subsequent evolution of the binary in chronological order (Figure 2).
(0) Initial stage ( t = 0 ). At the zero-age main sequence, the donor and accretor have M don = 3.6 M and M acc = 1.8 M , yielding an initial mass ratio of q 0 = 0.5 . The orbital period is set to P 0 = 21 d because, for these masses, Kepler’s law combined with the Eggleton Roche-lobe relation gives R L , don 0.38 a 19 R , matching the terminal-age main-sequence radius of a 3.6 M star; thus, the donor naturally reaches contact at the end of core-hydrogen burning. Detached, circular binaries with periods of a few tens of days are a typical starting point for the evolution of intermediate-mass systems [48].
(1) Start of Roche-lobe overflow ( t = 223.250 ± 0.005 Myr ). When the initially more massive donor fills its Roche lobe [34], the orbital period decreases from the initial P 0 = 21.0 ± 0.2 d to P = 19.6 ± 0.1 d. This shrinkage is dominated by conservative mass transfer from the more massive donor to the less massive accretor, which contracts the orbit while q < 1 [33]. Line-driven winds remove some angular momentum, but their integrated effect prior to contact is an order of magnitude smaller. At this stage, the donor has T eff , don = 8000 ± 150 K, log ( L / L ) don = 2.50 ± 0.05 , and R don = 9.5 ± 0.2 R , whereas the accretor has T eff , acc = 8800 ± 150 K, log ( L / L ) acc = 1.30 ± 0.05 , and R acc = 2.5 ± 0.1 R . The mass-transfer rate is still modest ( M ˙ 10 8 M yr 1 ), and the mass ratio has risen only to q = 0.50 ± 0.02 . Such a gentle approach to contact is typical for case-B evolution in intermediate-mass binaries.
(2) Thermal-timescale RLOF ( t = 223.255 ± 0.005 Myr ; Δ t = 5 ± 1 kyr after the onset of RLOF). Once the donor’s radiative envelope becomes weakly bound, mass loss proceeds on the Kelvin–Helmholtz timescale and the transfer rate climbs to a peak value of M ˙ max = ( 1.0 ± 0.3 ) × 10 6 M yr 1 . During this brief phase, the stellar parameters change little: the donor stays at T eff , don = 8000 ± 150 K, log ( L / L ) don = 2.50 ± 0.05 , and R don = 9.5 ± 0.2 R , while the accretor remains at T eff , acc = 8800 ± 150 K, log ( L / L ) acc = 1.30 ± 0.05 , and R acc = 2.5 ± 0.1 R . Because q < 1 , the orbit contracts further to the dynamical minimum P min = 19.4 ± 0.1 d.
(3) Algol reversal ( t = 223.414 ± 0.005 Myr ; Δ t = 169 ± 2 kyr after the onset of RLOF, 164 ± 2 kyr after the previous stage). When the component masses equalise ( q = 1.00 ± 0.02 ), the orbit reaches its dynamical minimum, P min = 19.4 ± 0.1 d. At this stage, the donor has shrunk to T eff , don = 5400 ± 100 K, log ( L / L ) don = 1.40 ± 0.05 , and R don = 5.7 ± 0.2 R , whereas the accretor has expanded significantly and grown hotter, reaching T eff , acc = 13,000 ± 300 K, log ( L / L ) acc = 2.70 ± 0.05 , and R acc = 4.1 ± 0.2 R . Conservative terms now act to widen the binary, and within 3 × 10 4 yr, the period starts to increase, while the mass-transfer rate rapidly drops from log M ˙ = 6.0 ± 0.2 to 8.0 ± 0.2 . Such rapid post-Algol expansion is a robust prediction of (i) semi-analytic stability analyses [33,49], (ii) 3D hydrodynamic simulations for radiative donors [37], and (iii) the long-term timing of classical Algols that show a switch from P ˙ < 0 to P ˙ > 0 after mass-ratio reversal [50]. Our evolutionary track duplicates this behaviour precisely: the angular momentum removed through the β -re-emission and δ -torus channels is sufficient to lift the orbit back to the observed value P now = 27.5 ± 0.1 d without triggering dynamical instability or a common envelope.
(4) The end of the RLOF, wind-driven phase ( t = 223.615 ± 0.005 Myr ; Δ t = 370 ± 3 kyr after the onset of RLOF, 201 ± 3 kyr after the previous stage). By this epoch, the donor has been reduced to M don = 0.80 ± 0.03 M , showing T eff , don = 5600 ± 100 K, log ( L / L ) don = 1.90 ± 0.05 , and R don = 9.5 ± 0.3 R , while the accretor has reached M acc = 2.90 ± 0.03 M and contracted to T eff , acc = 13,700 ± 300 K, log ( L / L ) acc = 2.30 ± 0.05 , and R acc = 2.7 ± 0.2 R . The mass-transfer rate has fallen below M ˙ ( 1 ± 0.3 ) × 10 8 M yr 1 . Most of the residual flow is expelled from the system ( 15 % ± 3 % via a low-specific-momentum circumbinary outflow), causing the orbit to expand secularly to P = 32.5 ± 0.2 d. Post-mass-transfer widening of this magnitude is a standard outcome for moderately non-conservative case-B binaries [51].
The present epoch ( t 223.503 Myr). Along the fiducial track, MWC 728 is an active post-Algol system with an observed orbital period of P obs = 27.5 ± 0.1 d. The Roche-filling donor (spectral type G/F) has M don = 1.30 ± 0.05 M , log L / L = 1.53 ± 0.05 ( L don = 34 ± 4 L ), log R / R = 0.89 ± 0.03 ( R don = 7.7 ± 0.6 R ), and an effective temperature of T eff , don = 6000 ± 200 K, matching the cool component seen in high-resolution spectra.
The rejuvenated accretor is the B7 IV primary, and it has grown to M acc = 2.67 ± 0.05 M , log L / L = 2.34 ± 0.05 ( L acc = 220 ± 25 L ), and log R / R = 0.44 ± 0.03 ( R acc = 2.8 ± 0.2 R ), with T eff , acc = 14,000 ± 500 K, fully consistent with the spectroscopic estimate of Miroshnichenko et al. [11].
Mass transfer is still ongoing at a rate of M ˙ transfer 10 6 M yr 1 , as indicated by the colour scale in Figure 3; this places the system in a steady, optically thick overflow regime.
These values give a present mass ratio of q = M acc / M don = 2.67 / 1.30 2.0 , identical, within the range of uncertainties, to the dynamical value derived from the same dataset.
Figure 3 marks the current locations of the cool donor (red) and hot accretor (blue) on both the HR and T eff –radius diagrams; their close match to the predicted tracks demonstrates that our moderately non-conservative evolutionary model reproduces all observed properties of MWC 728.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we combined corrected Gaia DR3 astrometry, Monte-Carlo photometric modelling, and non-conservative binary-evolution calculations to refine the properties and evolutionary history of the FS-CMa system MWC 728. Our main conclusions are as follows:
  • Distance and extinction: correcting the Gaia DR3 parallax for its large RUWE ( 9.7 ) with the method of El-Badry [15] gives d = 1.20 ± 0.10 kpc, which is fully consistent with a spectrophotometric distance of 1.0 ± 0.2 kpc [11].
  • Fundamental parameters: a 5000-cycle Monte-Carlo propagation yields log ( L / L ) acc = 2.6 ± 0.1 , log ( L / L ) don = 1.5 ± 0.1 , R acc = 3.5 ± 0.4 R , and R don = 7.7 ± 0.9 R , confirming a hot B7 IV accretor ( T eff = 14 , 000 ± 250 K) and a cool G-type donor ( T eff = 6000 ± 150 K).
  • Binary evolution: The best-fit MESA track starts with M don = 3.6 ± 0.1 M , M acc = 1.8 ± 0.1 M , and P 0 = 21.0 ± 0.2 d and evolves through thermally driven, moderately non-conservative Roche-lobe overflow. Mass loss fractions of α = 0.01 , β = 0.45 , δ = 0.15 , and γ = 1.3 reproduce the dusty torus and expand the orbit to the observed P obs = 27.5 ± 0.1 d. At t 223.5 Myr, the model matches the present-day masses ( M don = 1.30 ± 0.05 M , M acc = 2.67 ± 0.05 M ), the ratio q = 2.0 ± 0.1 , and an ongoing transfer rate of M ˙ tr ( 1 ± 0.3 ) × 10 6 M yr 1 .
Taken together, our results establish MWC 728 as a rare subject for testing angular-momentum loss calculations and dust-torus formation in intermediate-mass binaries, and they underscore the value of sustained, high-resolution spectroscopic and interferometric monitoring to capture their continuing, non-conservative evolution.

Author Contributions

Data analysis, N.L.V.; software, N.L.V. and A.T.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.V. and A.T.A.; writing—review and editing, N.L.V. and S.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP19578879).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15780338).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge S. V. Zharikov and A. S. Miroshnichenko for useful discussions and expert advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: RV—radial velocity; MCMC—Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo; MESA—Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics; MLT—mixing length theory; RLOF—Roche-lobe overflow; PMS—pre-main sequence;, ZAMS—zero-age main sequence.

References

  1. Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V.; Manset, N.; Khokhlov, S.A.; Nodyarov, A.S.; Klochkova, V.G.; Danford, S.; Kuratova, A.K.; Mennickent, R.; Chojnowski, S.D.; et al. Recent Progress in Finding Binary Systems with the B[e] Phenomenon. Galaxies 2023, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lamers, H.J.G.L.M.; Zickgraf, F.J.; de Winter, D.; Houziaux, L.; Zorec, J. An improved classification of B[e]-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 340, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  3. Miroshnichenko, A.S. Toward Understanding the B[e] Phenomenon. I. Definition of the Galactic FS CMa Stars. Astrophys. J. 2007, 667, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barsukova, E.A.; Burenkov, A.N.; Goranskij, V.P.; Zharikov, S.V.; Iliev, L.; Manset, N.; Metlova, N.V.; Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Moiseeva, A.V.; Nedialkov, P.L.; et al. B[e] Star CI Camelopardalis in the Optical Range. Astrophys. Bull. 2023, 78, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Varga, J.; Gerják, T.; Ábrahám, P.; Chen, L.; Gabányi, K.; Kóspál, Á. Dust evolution in the circumstellar disc of the unclassified B[e] star HD 50138. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 485, 3112–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khokhlov, S.A.; Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V.; Manset, N.; Arkharov, A.A.; Efimova, N.; Klimanov, S.; Larionov, V.M.; Kusakin, A.V.; Kokumbaeva, R.I.; et al. Toward Understanding the B[e] Phenomenon. VII. AS 386, a Single-lined Binary with a Candidate Black Hole Component. Astrophys. J. 2018, 856, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V. FS CMa Type Binaries. In The Physics of Evolved Stars: A Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Olivier Chesneau; EAS Publications Series; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2015; Volume 71–72, pp. 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. de la Fuente, D.; Najarro, F.; Trombley, C.; Davies, B.; Figer, D.F. First detections of FS Canis Majoris stars in clusters. Evolutionary state as constrained by coeval massive stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 575, A10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moranchel-Basurto, A.; Korčáková, D.; Chametla, R.O. 2.5D magnetohydrodynamic models of circumstellar discs around FS CMa post-mergers-I. Non-stationary accretion stage. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 523, 5554–5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merrill, P.W.; Burwell, C.G. Second Supplement to the Mount Wilson Catalogue and Bibliography of Stars of Classes B and a whose Spectra have Bright Hydrogen Lines. Astrophys. J. 1949, 110, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V.; Danford, S.; Manset, N.; Korčáková, D.; Kříček, R.; Šlechta, M.; Omarov, C.T.; Kusakin, A.V.; Kuratov, K.S.; et al. Toward Understanding the B[e] Phenomenon. V. Nature and Spectral Variations of the MWC 728 Binary System. Astrophys. J. 2015, 809, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bailer-Jones, C.A.L.; Rybizki, J.; Fouesneau, M.; Demleitner, M.; Andrae, R. Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3. Archit. J. 2021, 161, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gaia Collaboration; Brown, A.G.A.; Vallenari, A.; Prusti, T.; de Bruijne, J.H.J.; Babusiaux, C.; Biermann, M.; Creevey, O.L.; Evans, D.W.; Eyer, L.; et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 649, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lindegren, L.; Hernández, J.; Bombrun, A.; Klioner, S.; Bastian, U.; Ramos-Lerate, M.; de Torres, A.; Steidelmüller, H.; Stephenson, C.; Hobbs, D.; et al. Gaia Data Release 2. The astrometric solution. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 616, A2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Badry, K. How to use Gaia parallaxes for stars with poor astrometric fits. arXiv 2025, arXiv:arXiv:2504.11528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Green, G.M.; Schlafly, E.; Zucker, C.; Speagle, J.S.; Finkbeiner, D. A 3D Dust Map Based on Gaia, Pan-STARRS 1, and 2MASS. Astrophys. J. 2019, 887, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pecaut, M.J.; Mamajek, E.E. Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-main-sequence Stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2013, 208, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paxton, B.; Bildsten, L.; Dotter, A.; Herwig, F.; Lesaffre, P.; Timmes, F. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA). Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 192, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paxton, B.; Cantiello, M.; Arras, P.; Bildsten, L.; Brown, E.F.; Dotter, A.; Mankovich, C.; Montgomery, M.H.; Stello, D.; Timmes, F.X.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2013, 208, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paxton, B.; Marchant, P.; Schwab, J.; Bauer, E.B.; Bildsten, L.; Cantiello, M.; Dessart, L.; Farmer, R.; Hu, H.; Langer, N.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2015, 220, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paxton, B.; Schwab, J.; Bauer, E.B.; Bildsten, L.; Blinnikov, S.; Duffell, P.; Farmer, R.; Goldberg, J.A.; Marchant, P.; Sorokina, E.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2018, 234, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Paxton, B.; Smolec, R.; Schwab, J.; Gautschy, A.; Bildsten, L.; Cantiello, M.; Dotter, A.; Farmer, R.; Goldberg, J.A.; Jermyn, A.S.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2019, 243, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jermyn, A.S.; Bauer, E.B.; Schwab, J.; Farmer, R.; Ball, W.H.; Bellinger, E.P.; Dotter, A.; Joyce, M.; Marchant, P.; Mombarg, J.S.G.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Time-dependent Convection, Energy Conservation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2023, 265, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vaidman, N.L.; Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V.; Khokhlov, S.A.; Agishev, A.T.; Yermekbayev, B.S. Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083. Galaxies 2025, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Asplund, M.; Grevesse, N.; Sauval, A.J.; Scott, P. The Chemical Composition of the Sun. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 481–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vink, J.S.; de Koter, A.; Lamers, H.J.G.L.M. Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 369, 574–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. de Jager, C.; Nieuwenhuijzen, H.; van der Hucht, K.A. Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1988, 72, 259–289. [Google Scholar]
  28. Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N.; van Loon, J.T.; Gehrz, R.D.; Figer, D.F. A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 492, 5994–6006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Björklund, R.; Sundqvist, J.O.; Singh, S.M.; Puls, J.; Najarro, F. New predictions for radiation-driven, steady-state mass-loss and wind-momentum from hot, massive stars. III. Updated mass-loss rates for stellar evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 676, A109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Crowther, P.A.; Lennon, D.J.; Walborn, N.R. Physical parameters and wind properties of galactic early B supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 446, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smith, N. Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 52, 487–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kolb, U.; Ritter, H. A comparative study of the evolution of a close binary using a standard and an improved technique for computing mass transfer. Astron. Astrophys. 1990, 236, 385–392. [Google Scholar]
  33. Soberman, G.E.; Phinney, E.S.; van den Heuvel, E.P.J. Stability criteria for mass transfer in binary stellar evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 1997, 327, 620–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eggleton, P.P. Aproximations to the radii of Roche lobes. Astrophys. J. 1983, 268, 368–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ritter, H. Turning on and off mass transfer in cataclysmic binaries. Astron. Astrophys. 1988, 202, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  36. Reimers, D. Observational evidence for mass-loss from K giants, G and K supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 1977, 57, 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  37. Deschamps, R.; Siess, L.; Davis, P.J.; Jorissen, A. Critically-rotating accretors and non-conservative evolution in Algols. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 557, A40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kraus, S.; Hofmann, K.H.; Menten, K.M.; Schertl, D.; Weigelt, G.; Wyrowski, F.; Meilland, A.; Perraut, K.; Petrov, R.; Robbe-Dubois, S.; et al. A hot compact dust disk around a massive young stellar object. Nature 2010, 466, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pejcha, O.; Metzger, B.D.; Tomida, K. Cool and luminous transients from mass-losing binary stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 455, 4351–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Artymowicz, P.; Lubow, S.H. Dynamics of Binary-Disk Interaction. I. Resonances and Disk Gap Sizes. Astrophys. J. 1994, 421, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hut, P. Tidal evolution in close binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 1981, 99, 126–140. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zahn, J.P. Tidal friction in close binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 1977, 57, 383–394. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zahn, J.P. Tidal evolution of close binary stars. I - Revisiting the theory of the equilibrium tide. Astron. Astrophys. 1989, 220, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
  44. Böhm-Vitense, E. Über die Wasserstoffkonvektionszone in Sternen verschiedener Effektivtemperaturen und Leuchtkräfte. Mit 5 Textabbildungen. Z. FÜR Astrophys. 1958, 46, 108. [Google Scholar]
  45. Claret, A. Theoretical tidal evolution constants for stellar models from the pre-main sequence to the white dwarf stage. Apsidal motion constants, moment of inertia, and gravitational potential energy. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 674, A67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Herwig, F. The evolution of AGB stars with convective overshoot. Astron. Astrophys. 2000, 360, 952–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Claret, A.; Torres, G. The Dependence of Convective Core Overshooting on Stellar Mass: A Semi-empirical Determination Using the Diffusive Approach with Two Different Element Mixtures. Astrophys. J. 2017, 849, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tauris, T.M.; van den Heuvel, E.P.J. Formation and evolution of compact stellar X-ray sources. In Compact Stellar X-Ray Sources; Lewin, W.H.G., van der Klis, M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; Volume 39, pp. 623–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Webbink, R.F. The evolution of low-mass close binary systems. III. 1.50 M sun: Unsteady mass loss and shrinking secondaries. Astrophys. J. 1977, 211, 486–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shao, Y.; Li, X.D. On the Formation of Be Stars through Binary Interaction. Astrophys. J. 2014, 796, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, X.; Han, Z. Mass transfer from a giant star to a main-sequence companion and its contribution to long-orbital-period blue stragglers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008, 387, 1416–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Corner plot of the posterior distributions for the stellar radius and luminosity derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Diagonal panels show marginalized distributions with median and 16th/84th percentiles marked by dashed lines. Joint distributions are shown as shaded density contours.
Figure 1. Corner plot of the posterior distributions for the stellar radius and luminosity derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Diagonal panels show marginalized distributions with median and 16th/84th percentiles marked by dashed lines. Joint distributions are shown as shaded density contours.
Galaxies 13 00078 g001
Figure 2. Time evolution of our fiducial MWC 728 model over the interval 223.20 t 223.68 Myr. Top panel: donor (red curve) and accretor (blue curve) masses; the red and blue filled circles mark the present epoch ( t = 223.503 Myr). Middle panel: logarithm of the mass-transfer rate, log M ˙ ( M yr 1 ) ; the yellow circle highlights the present epoch. Bottom panel: orbital period P; the yellow circle shows the current system’s parameters. For the middle and bottom panels, the coloured curve shows the fiducial model, while the grey areas enclose the range obtained when the circumbinary–torus fraction is varied over 0.10 δ 0.25 . All coloured curves are additionally colour–coded by the instantaneous mass ratio q = M acc / M don (colour bar on the right). Vertical dashed lines labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate the evolutionary milestones discussed in Section 4.
Figure 2. Time evolution of our fiducial MWC 728 model over the interval 223.20 t 223.68 Myr. Top panel: donor (red curve) and accretor (blue curve) masses; the red and blue filled circles mark the present epoch ( t = 223.503 Myr). Middle panel: logarithm of the mass-transfer rate, log M ˙ ( M yr 1 ) ; the yellow circle highlights the present epoch. Bottom panel: orbital period P; the yellow circle shows the current system’s parameters. For the middle and bottom panels, the coloured curve shows the fiducial model, while the grey areas enclose the range obtained when the circumbinary–torus fraction is varied over 0.10 δ 0.25 . All coloured curves are additionally colour–coded by the instantaneous mass ratio q = M acc / M don (colour bar on the right). Vertical dashed lines labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate the evolutionary milestones discussed in Section 4.
Galaxies 13 00078 g002
Figure 3. Evolutionary tracks of both binary components displayed in two panels. Top panel: effective temperature, T eff , versus luminosity, log ( L / L ) . Bottom panel: T eff versus radius R / R . The dashed curve follows the star that began with an initial mass of M init = 1.8 M ; the solid curve shows the track of the star that started with M init = 3.6 M . The red symbol marks the current observed position of the cooler component, while the blue symbol indicates the current position of the hotter component. The accompanying colour bar encodes the instantaneous mass–transfer rate, M ˙ transfer , within the system.
Figure 3. Evolutionary tracks of both binary components displayed in two panels. Top panel: effective temperature, T eff , versus luminosity, log ( L / L ) . Bottom panel: T eff versus radius R / R . The dashed curve follows the star that began with an initial mass of M init = 1.8 M ; the solid curve shows the track of the star that started with M init = 3.6 M . The red symbol marks the current observed position of the cooler component, while the blue symbol indicates the current position of the hotter component. The accompanying colour bar encodes the instantaneous mass–transfer rate, M ˙ transfer , within the system.
Galaxies 13 00078 g003
Table 1. Revised parameters of MWC 728 ( d = 1.20  kpc).
Table 1. Revised parameters of MWC 728 ( d = 1.20  kpc).
ParameterAccretorDonor
log ( L / L ) 2.63 ± 0.09 1.53 ± 0.09
R / R 3.5 ± 0.4 7.8 ± 1.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vaidman, N.L.; Khokhlov, S.A.; Agishev, A.T. Unveiling the Evolution of MWC 728: Non-Conservative Mass Transfer in an FS CMa Binary. Galaxies 2025, 13, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13040078

AMA Style

Vaidman NL, Khokhlov SA, Agishev AT. Unveiling the Evolution of MWC 728: Non-Conservative Mass Transfer in an FS CMa Binary. Galaxies. 2025; 13(4):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13040078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vaidman, Nadezhda L., Serik A. Khokhlov, and Aldiyar T. Agishev. 2025. "Unveiling the Evolution of MWC 728: Non-Conservative Mass Transfer in an FS CMa Binary" Galaxies 13, no. 4: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13040078

APA Style

Vaidman, N. L., Khokhlov, S. A., & Agishev, A. T. (2025). Unveiling the Evolution of MWC 728: Non-Conservative Mass Transfer in an FS CMa Binary. Galaxies, 13(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13040078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop