Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Mortality Predictors in COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Patients: Insights into Age, Procalcitonin, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Ferritin Lactate Index
Next Article in Special Issue
A Lateral-Flow Device for the Rapid Detection of Scedosporium Species
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Fingerprint in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role and Value of Professional Rapid Testing of Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) in Europe: A Special Focus on the Czech Republic, Poland, and Romania
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Clinical Evaluation of Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex Assay

Diagnostics 2024, 14(7), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14070683
by Wai-Sing Chan, Kan-Pui Wong, Siu-Kei Yau, Ching-Yan Wong, Tsz-Ching Chan, Jeffrey Hung, Kristi Tsz-Wan Lai, Chin-Pang Leung, Candy Ling-Na Wang, Chun-Hang Au, Thomas Shek-Kong Wan, Edmond Shiu-Kwan Ma and Bone Siu-Fai Tang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2024, 14(7), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14070683
Submission received: 6 March 2024 / Accepted: 22 March 2024 / Published: 24 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiology Laboratory: Sample Collection and Diagnosis Advances)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I am pleasured to be invited to review the manuscript, which entitled “Clinical evaluation of Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus and 2 Alinity m Resp-4-Plex Assay”. The paper is clearly focused, well-structured, easy to read and understand, and the content and results are relevant to the topic. The development of rapid diagnostic tools indeed provides significant benefits to clinical care for patients.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

N/A.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The study aimed to evaluate the performance of Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex Assay, two commercial in vitro diagnostic NAATs for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The respiratory specimens included were from upper and lower respiratory tract, which are routinely tested with any of or combination of SOC methods. The performance of both assays was comparable to the SOC methods. Two versions of the paper are available. The second one has a lot of improvement, specially in the introduction and discussion. The manuscript is clear, relevant for the field and presented in a well-structured manner, therefore I highly recommend its publication. 

Back to TopTop