Next Article in Journal
Computed Tomography Confirms Increased Left Atrial Volume in Patients with Bayés Syndrome Referred for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Previous Article in Journal
Prevention of Overhead Shoulder Injuries in Throwing Athletes: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Applied to Acral Melanocytic Lesions: A Systematic Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Diagnosis of Skin and Superficial Tissue Disorders—“Old and Emerging” Diagnostic Tools

Pathology Unit, DIAP-Dipartimento InterAziendale di Anatomia Patologica di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital-AUSL Bologna, 40133 Bologna, Italy
Diagnostics 2024, 14(21), 2414; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212414
Submission received: 28 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 30 October 2024
Skin and superficial tissue disorders (SSTDs) are some of the most common diseases affecting humans. SSTDs cover an incredibly wide range of different diseases, including the neoplastic, degenerative, inflammatory, autoimmune, and many others. They are associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and costs for healthcare systems. Early diagnosis of this group of diseases and their complications is crucial to reduce morbidity, mortality, healthcare costs, and associated conditions. In recent years, the rapid development of technological and computer tools has led to the emergence of a large number of innovative diagnostic techniques (“emerging” tools) that have literally revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of SSTDs, and their relationship with established diagnostic techniques (“old” tools) needs to be clarified [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. These innovative techniques can assist dermatologists in the “classical” examination of the patient and significantly improve diagnostic accuracy with considerable time savings [videodermoscopy, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy, line-field confocal optical coherence (LC-OCT), etc.] [1,2,3,4,5,6]. On the other hand, some of these emerging diagnostic tools involve histologic and/or laboratory diagnosis (whole-exome sequencing, methylation and proteomic analysis, automated real-time PCR assay, and NGS), as well as the involvement of healthcare professionals not traditionally involved in the diagnosis of SSTDs, such as radiologists, bioengineers, and informatics specialists [high-resolution ultrasound imaging (HRUI), computational and deep learning-based systems, AI-based digital image analysis software] [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. As the description of all these diagnostic tools is beyond the scope of this manuscript, we have focused only on the subjects of this Special Issue. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) of the skin is an in vivo skin imaging technique that allows the study of several skin tumors and inflammatory conditions [1,2,3]. RCM uses a low-power laser beam to produce a horizontal and real-time view of the skin at a cellular-level resolution [1,2,3]. The different reflection index of cellular structures hit by the laser beam is captured and transformed by software into a two-dimensional grayscale image [1,2,3]. LC-OCT is a novel device able to reproduce a “virtual biopsy” of the skin by integrating the properties of reflectance confocal microscopy (cellular resolution) and optical coherence tomography (depth acquisition) [1,4,5,6]. LC-OCT has been developed over the last few years and was approved as a medical device in Europe in 2020 [1,4,5,6]. Since then, an impressive number of papers have been published on this technique, reflecting the potential application of LC-OCT in almost all dermatologic diseases [1,4,5,6]. HRUI makes it possible to accurately visualize the skin and subcutis, with modern ultrasound equipment and high-frequency transducers enabling an in-depth lateral spatial resolution to differentiate several histological layers (epidermis, papillary and reticular dermis, subcutis, etc.) [7,8,9,10]. In addition, HRUI combined with power Doppler imaging accurately visualizes the dermal vascular plexuses, thus enhancing the diagnostic potential of this revolutionary technique and leading to the modern definition of sonohistology [7,8,9,10]. Molecular biology techniques have been part of the diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic, genetic, andhereditary characterization of SSTDs for many years, but new and increasingly complex techniques (and often much more expensive equipment requiring specific skills and expertise) are becoming available every day (whole-exome sequencing, methylation and proteomic analysis, automated real-time PCR assay, and NGS) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Obviously, a dissertation on these molecular biology tools would require specialized books and dedicated literature and is beyond the scope of this editorial [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, it is essential that any professional approaching SSTDs becomes familiar with these tools and routinely collaborates with molecular biologists and geneticists [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. All of medicine and science have recently been transformed by the development and diffusion of software-based and, ultimately, AI-based techniques, which have opened up scenarios that would have been unimaginable just a few years ago [18,19,20,21]. Every day, thousands of manuscripts, patents, and diagnostic and therapeutic tools are published and introduced into the marketing space, making it difficult to keep up with all the news [18,19,20,21]. In the upcoming months, the contribution of these software-based and AI-based techniques to diagnostic routines will probably be clarified [18,19,20,21].
In summary, multiple “emerging” tools are becoming available every day for the diagnosis of SSTDs, thus requiring integration with “old” tools and a close collaboration between an increasing number of professionals and skillsets.

Funding

This paper did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest or funding to disclose.

References

  1. Perez-Anker, J.; Puig, S.; Alos, L.; García, A.; Alejo, B.; Cinotti, E.; Orte Cano, C.; Tognetti, L.; Lenoir, C.; Monnier, J.; et al. Morphological evaluation of melanocytic lesions with three-dimensional line-field confocal optical coherence tomography: Correlation with histopathology and reflectance confocal microscopy. A pilot study. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2022, 47, 2222–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cinotti, E.; Labeille, B.; Cambazard, F.; Perrot, J.L. Confocal Microscopy for Special Sites and Special Uses. Dermatol. Clin. 2016, 34, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xiong, Y.Q.; Ma, S.J.; Mo, Y.; Huo, S.T.; Wen, Y.Q.; Chen, Q. Comparison of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours: A meta-analysis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 143, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cappilli, S.; Paradisi, A.; Di Stefani, A.; Palmisano, G.; Pellegrino, L.; D’Onghia, M.; Ricci, C.; Tognetti, L.; Verzì, A.E.; Rubegni, P.; et al. Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography: A New Skin Imaging Technique Reproducing a “Virtual Biopsy” with Evolving Clinical Applications in Dermatology. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cappilli, S.; Tognetti, L.; Di Stefani, A.; Ricci, C.; Pellegrino, L.; Palmisano, G.; Cinotti, E.; Rubegni, P.; Del Marmol, V.; Suppa, M.; et al. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) for the assessment of flat pigmented lesions of the face. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2024. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suppa, M.; Palmisano, G.; Tognetti, L.; Lenoir, C.; Cappilli, S.; Fontaine, M.; Orte Cano, C.; Diet, G.; Perez-Anker, J.; Schuh, S.; et al. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography in melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin tumors. Ital. J. Dermatol. Venerol. 2023, 158, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Catalano, O.; Roldán, F.A.; Varelli, C.; Bard, R.; Corvino, A.; Wortsman, X. Skin cancer: Findings and role of high-resolution ultrasound. J. Ultrasound 2019, 22, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wortsman, X. Sonography of Dermatologic Emergencies. J. Ultrasound Med. 2017, 36, 1905–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ricci, V.; Ricci, C.; Cocco, G.; Donati, D.; Farì, G.; Mezian, K.; Naňka, O.; Özçakar, L. From histology to sonography in skin and superficial tissue disorders: EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM* approach. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2022, 237, 154003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ricci, V.; Ricci, C.; Gervasoni, F.; Giulio, C.; Farì, G.; Andreoli, A.; Özçakar, L. From physical to ultrasound examination in lymphedema: A novel dynamic approach. J. Ultrasound 2022, 25, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Braun-Falco, M.; Schempp, W.; Weyers, W. Molecular diagnosis in dermatopathology: What makes sense, and what doesn’t. Exp. Dermatol. 2009, 18, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zarabi, S.K.; Azzato, E.M.; Tu, Z.J.; Ni, Y.; Billings, S.D.; Arbesman, J.; Funchain, P.; Gastman, B.; Farkas, D.H.; Ko, J.S. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) to classify melanocytic neoplasms. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2020, 47, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Teh, R.; Azimi, A.; Pupo, G.M.; Ali, M.; Mann, G.J.; Fernández-Peñas, P. Genomic and proteomic findings in early melanoma and opportunities for early diagnosis. Exp. Dermatol. 2023, 32, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cappellesso, R.; Nozzoli, F.; Zito Marino, F.; Simi, S.; Castiglione, F.; De Giorgi, V.; Cota, C.; Senetta, R.; Scognamiglio, G.; Anniciello, A.M.; et al. NTRK Gene Fusion Detection in Atypical Spitz Tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, W.K.; Kuo, T.T.; Wu, C.E.; Cheng, H.Y.; Hsieh, C.H.; Hsieh, J.J.; Shen, Y.C.; Hou, M.M.; Hsu, T.; Chang, J.W. A comparison of immunohistochemical and molecular methods used for analyzing the BRAF V600E gene mutation in malignant melanoma in Taiwan. Asia-Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 12, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sarkar, D.; Leung, E.Y.; Baguley, B.C.; Finlay, G.J.; Askarian-Amiri, M.E. Epigenetic regulation in human melanoma: Past and future. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xing, Y.; Deng, S. Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation using sequence-specific, real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1235, 340535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kantor, J. Software-Based Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging and Scanning in Plastic Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 141, 321e–322e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brancaccio, G.; Balato, A.; Malvehy, J.; Puig, S.; Argenziano, G.; Kittler, H. Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Diagnosis: A Reality Check. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2024, 144, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, K.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Lv, C.; Yan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Huang, W.; Jiang, Z.; Hu, K.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Based Psoriasis Severity Assessment: Real-world Study and Application. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e44932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barata, C.; Rotemberg, V.; Codella, N.C.F.; Tschandl, P.; Rinner, C.; Akay, B.N.; Apalla, Z.; Argenziano, G.; Halpern, A.; Lallas, A.; et al. A reinforcement learning model for AI-based decision support in skin cancer. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 1941–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ricci, C. Advances in Diagnosis of Skin and Superficial Tissue Disorders—“Old and Emerging” Diagnostic Tools. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212414

AMA Style

Ricci C. Advances in Diagnosis of Skin and Superficial Tissue Disorders—“Old and Emerging” Diagnostic Tools. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(21):2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ricci, Costantino. 2024. "Advances in Diagnosis of Skin and Superficial Tissue Disorders—“Old and Emerging” Diagnostic Tools" Diagnostics 14, no. 21: 2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212414

APA Style

Ricci, C. (2024). Advances in Diagnosis of Skin and Superficial Tissue Disorders—“Old and Emerging” Diagnostic Tools. Diagnostics, 14(21), 2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop