Procedural Software Toolkit in the Armamentarium of Interventional Therapies: A Review of Additive Usefulness and Current Evidence
, Faisal Khalid BinShaiq 2, Rayan Ibrahim Aloraifi 2, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Almefleh 2, Saud Abdulaziz Alessa 2, Adi Saud Alobud 2, Abdulmonem Mohammed AlSharidah 3, Abdulmajeed Bin Dahmash 4, Mohammad S. Al-Aftan 1 and Bander Fuhaid Al-Dhaferi 1Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear author, you have designed very exhausting work in the field of interventional radiology and other surgical guidance preoperatively, perioperatively, and also postoperatively. I am a surgeon in the field, but I can not reveal my ID due to bias possibility. The English language is good, the design is good, and there is no other resembling study according to my research that combines useful software throughout the world. It can encourage future studies like this that enhance the ability of surgeons or other interventionalists in the whole world. Finally, well done.
Reviewer 2 Report
Original review of an interesting topic. Very wel-structured tractation.
Reviewer 3 Report
Overall: Very well written, organized manuscript.
Specific comments: The phrase "Our search revealed no evidence of its practical clinical impact." I understand that this means that there is no literature evidence of clinical impact. But, it has a negative connotation that would tend to imply that it isn't useful. Perhaps soften that phrase with "Our literature search did not reveal scientific evidence of clinical impact at this time."
Figures: very well done
Covers many different vendors and shows no commercial bias.
