Next Article in Journal
Post-Acute COVID-19 Joint Pain and New Onset of Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmark Detection in Series of CT Slices Using Multi-Phased Regression Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Invasive Imaging Methods to Evaluate Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Fat Quantification: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Automated Sagittal Skeletal Classification of Children Based on Deep Learning
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Automated Method of 3D Facial Soft Tissue Landmark Prediction Based on Object Detection and Deep Learning

Diagnostics 2023, 13(11), 1853; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111853
by Yuchen Zhang 1,2,†, Yifei Xu 3,†, Jiamin Zhao 1, Tianjing Du 1, Dongning Li 1, Xinyan Zhao 1, Jinxiu Wang 1, Chen Li 2, Junbo Tu 1,* and Kun Qi 1,*,‡
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(11), 1853; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111853
Submission received: 28 April 2023 / Revised: 20 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1.       This study proposes a prediction algorithm for facial soft tissue landmarks based directly on a 3D model of the human face, which can avoid various problems that occur when converting 3D models to 2D attribute maps.

2.       The topic is relevant in the field.

3.       The methodology is very good and correct.

4.       The conclusions are consistent with the evidence.

5.       The references are appropriate.

6.       The obtained results demonstrated that the author’s novel method is more accurate and predicts more landmarks than other deep learning methods.

7.       It is necessary to apply this method to a larger number of patients in order to obtain reliable results.

8.       More research is definitely needed to establish this method in clinical practice.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Paper well written and coherent with journal aims. However discussion should be improved to better highlight the advantages of this novel approach

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript proposes an  algorithm for facial soft tissue landmakrs based directly on a 3D model of the human face. 

The introduction is too long.

The aim is not clearly described and is chaotic. 

IT is difficult to follow. 

The error between the proposed method and manual labelling should be emphasised. 

How did you calculate the error compared to the manual labelling(Table 3)?

The discussion is too short. It does not compare the data to others form the literature. 

The conclusion is ambiguous and is not supported by the results. 

English language should be revised

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper has been improved, comments to reviewers answered. 

Back to TopTop