1. Introduction
Lyapunov functions/functionals have a long history of successful use in ordinary differential equations, functional differential equations, and Volterra integro-differential equations. The literature is vast, and we refer the reader to the most prominent results given in [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8]. Most scientific fields are directly or indirectly involved with differential or integral equations. Additionally, a lot of the issues call for quite precise qualitative outcomes. In particular, it is imperative to consider the following issues when dealing with certain problems, for example, in the case that a convenient approximation cannot be used in place of the function. Moreover, it is of great benefit to understand how each solution behaves as well as understand how solutions behave over a very long period of time. It is challenging to achieve all three requirements, even with the most sophisticated computational techniques. However, A. M. Lyapunov, a Russian mathematician, developed a straightforward approach that satisfied those requirements for ordinary differential equations more than a century ago. His approach is now known as the “Lyapunov direct method”.
Many researchers differentiate an integral equation before using Lyapunov’s direct approach on it. Miller, in [
7], considered a system of integral equations transferred to a system of integro-differential equations and used the notion of the Lyapunov direct method to analyze the solutions. The given functions are not differentiable, which makes this procedure complex and challenging. Furthermore, it is well known that differentiation causes roughness, whereas integration produces smoothness; as a result, differentiation might produce results that might not be applicable to or even hold for the original problem. T. A. Burton in [
1] compiled a collection of recent results and papers on integral equations. His work contains clever ways of constructing Lyapunov functions/functionals for integral equations. Burton utilizes Lyapunov functionals along with the resolvent to arrive at boundedness and stability results. In [
9], the authors extended some of the arguments of [
1] to Caputo integral equations and arrived at boundedness and stability results. Researchers and scientists periodically use Laplace transform to solve an integral equation of the convolution type. No one up till now has been able to use Laplace transform on integral equations that are not of convolution type. That is why we believe that the results of this this paper are significant and innovative.
As we have mentioned, the Lyapunov method is well established in the study of integro-differential equations. For example, in Ref. [
10], the authors considered the nonlinear integro-differential equation
where
A,
,
p, and
are scalar functions that are continuous, use Lyapunov functionals combined with Laplace transform, and provide qualitative results concerning the equation’s solution. Our approach is a novel method of analyzing solutions to integral equations. This, by itself, should spark an outburst of new research in integral equations and related topics.
This paper is organized into the following sections. In
Section 2, we consider linear equations and utilize Lyapunov functionals combined with Laplace transform and obtain boundedness and existence results concerning solutions. In
Section 3, we extend the results of
Section 2 to nonlinear integral equations.
Section 4 is devoted to integral equations with infinite delay and integral equations with several kernels. Examples will be fully worked out in the relevant sections.
The following is the definition of Laplace transform. We say the function
is of an exponential order for
if there are constants
and
c such that
Let
be a piecewise continuous function that is defined for
and of exponential order. Then, the Laplace transform
of
is defined by the integral
where
s is a real number chosen so that the improper integral exists.
Below, we briefly introduce the notion of a Lyapunov function/functional. The definitions below are of general types, and hence they can be adjusted to suit different types of differential equations or integral equations. Let
D be an open subset of
containing
Define
where
V is any differentiable
scalar function. If
is any differentiable function, then
is a scalar function of
t, and using the chain rule we can compute its derivative,
For emphasis, let
D be an open subset of
containing
and
with
Assume the existence of the unknown solution
of the system
where
Thus,
x and
f are
n vectors. Then, it follows from the above argument that
Thus, expression (
2) defines the derivative of the function
along the unknown solutions of (
1). Let
D be the subset defined above.
Definition 1. A continuous autonomous function is positive definite ifV is said to be negative definite if is positive definite. It is customary to define a Lyapunov function by the next definition. This is the case when the function
f in (
1) does not explicitly depend on time
or system (
1) is autonomous.
Definition 2. Lethave continuous first partial derivatives. If V is positive definite andfor and then V is called a Lyapunov function for system (
1)
. If the inequality is strict, that is, , then V is said to be a strict Lyapunov function.
For the sake of this paper, we adopt the following definition of a Lyapunov function.
Definition 3. Let M and τ be positive constants. Let V be defined as in Definition 2. Iffor and then V is called a Lyapunov function for system (
1)
. The literature on the use of Lyapunov functions/functionals in differential, functional differential equations are vast, and we refer the reader to [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
11,
12].
For the rest of the paper, we use the notation
where
x is the unknown solution of (
1).
2. Linear Integral Equations
We begin by considering the linear and scalar integral equation
where
is continuous and
is continuous for
If
C and
a are differentiable, we can differentiate (
3) to obtain a Volterra integro-differential equation, which we can then analyze using the method of [
10]. However, because differentiability is such a significant criterion, we might not always have that luxury. We want to be clear that the approach we use in this work is completely distinct from any approach offered in the book [
1]. However, for more reading on the subject of Volterra integro-differential equations, we refer to [
6,
7,
8,
13,
14]. We begin with the following lemma.
Lemma 1. Suppose there is a differentiable function such thatand If is any solution of (
3)
and if the Lyapunov function V is defined bythen there exists a constant such thatwhere Proof. Let
V be defined by (
5) and
be a solution of (
3). Then, differentiating
V with respect to
t gives
Now, from (
3) we have that
Substituting into (
7), we arrive at
□
Proposition 1. If is uniformly continuous, and then Proof. Suppose the contrary, that is,
f does not converge to zero. Then, there is an
such that we can define an increasing sequence
so that
so we have
Since
f is uniformly continuous,
exists such that
By referring to the subsequence, we may suppose that
for each
Since the intervals
are disjointed, we have that
Summing these intervals, we see that
which is a contradiction. This completes the proof. □
Lemma 2. Let be uniformly continuous such that Let ψ be defined in Lemma 1 and ifthenand Proof. Since
and due to (
9), we have from (
8) that
or
Taking the limit at
we obtain
This proves since the term on the right-hand side is independent of Since for all uniformly continuous, and it follows from Proposition 1 that This completes the proof. □
Remark 1. The results of Lemma 2 imply that a positive constant F exists such that
Theorem 1. Assume the hypotheses of Lemmata 1 and 2 hold. In addition, we assume that β and ψ are of exponential orders. If is any solution of (
3)
, then Proof. Let ∗ denote the convolution between two functions. By taking the Laplace transform in (
8), we arrive at
Solving for
gives
Due to (
6), there is a non-negative function
that is of exponential order such that
Taking the Laplace transform and using
we arrive at
Taking the Laplace transform in (
5), we obtain
Comparing the last two expressions and solving for
, we obtain
Taking the inverse Laplace transform in (
12), we obtain
or
This completes the proof. □
We display the following simple example. Note that the figures accompanying the several examples are numerically approximated. The approximate solutions are obtained using the iterative method,
where
. The sequence converges to the approximate solution as the number of iterations approaches
∞.
Example 1. Consider the integral equation Then, we have Set Then, it follows that In addition, and hence Thus, by Theorem 1 any solution of (
14)
satisfiessince We refer to Figure 1. for the upper bound on the solution. 3. Nonlinear Integral Equations
Now, we extend the results of
Section 2 to the nonlinear and scalar integral equations of the form
where the continuity of
a and
C are the same as in
Section 2 and the function
h is continuous in
y and satisfies the growth condition
for positive constant
The transition from the linear case to nonlinear case is not difficult, but nevertheless some of the details must be provided. The next lemma is parallel to Lemma 1.
Lemma 3. Assume (
16)
, and suppose there is a differentiable function such thatand If is any solution of (
15)
and if the Lyapunov function V is defined bythen a constant exists such thatwhere such that Proof. Let
V be defined by (
18) and
be a solution of (
15). Then, differentiating
V with respect to
t gives
Now, from (
15) we have that
Substituting into (
20), we arrive at
□
Similarly, the next lemma is parallel to Lemma 2. Its proof is identical to Lemma 1, and it will be omitted.
Lemma 4. Assume (
9)
, and let be a scalar function that is uniformly continuous on and be defined by We state our results in the next theorem, which is parallel to Theorem 1.
Theorem 2. Assume the hypotheses of Lemmata 3 and 4 hold. If is any solution of (
15)
, then Proof. By taking the Laplace transform in (
21), we arrive at
Solving for
gives
Due to (
19), there is a non-negative function
of an exponential order such that
By taking the Laplace transform and by considering
, we have that
Taking the Laplace transform in (
18), we obtain
Comparing the last two expressions and solving for
, we obtain
Taking the inverse Laplace transform in (
22), we obtain
or
where
such that
This completes the proof. □
Now, we offer an example.
Example 2. Consider the nonlinear integral equation Then, and Then, we have, Let Then, it follows that In addition, which implies that for Thus, condition (
17)
is satisfied. Moreover, Thus, by Theorem 2 any solution of (
23)
satisfiessince We refer to Figure 2. for the upper bound on the solution. 4. Infinite Delay and Several Kernels
In this section, we extend the method to integral equations with infinite delay if the history of the solution is known and is a continuous function. Additionally, we generalize the concept to integral equations with several kernels.
We begin by considering scalar integral equations with infinite delay of the form
where
b,
C, and
g are continuous. We assume the solution exists under some conditions. To specify a solution of (
24), we require a continuous initial function
with
where
is continuous so that
is basically of the form of (
15). With this set up, a function
is said to be a solution of (
24), if
for
and
satisfies (
24) for
Finally, Theorem 2 is exactly what would one needs to obtain boundedness results.
We end this paper with the extension to integral equations with
N number of kernels and
N number of nonlinear functions in
Thus, we consider the scalar nonlinear integral equation
where all functions are scalars and continuous on their respective domains. The functions
are continuous and satisfy the growth condition
for positive constants
Under this set up, the conditions of Lemmata 3 and 4 can be easily modified as seen next. Suppose there are differentiable functions
for
such that
Moreover, if we assume the existence of a scalar function
that is uniformly continuous on
; then, we may redefine (
21) as follows:
If
is any solution of (
26), then (
18) is modified and given by
Considering the above modifications, one can easily conclude the following theorem.
Theorem 3. Assume conditions (
27), (
28)
, and If is any solution of (
26)
, thenwhere the constant such that Now, we offer an example.
Example 3. Consider the nonlinear integral equationConsequently, and Then, we have, and Let Then, it follows thatIn addition, (
28)
is satisfied for Moreover,Thus, by Theorem 3 any solution of (
31)
satisfies We refer to Figure 3. for the upper bound on the solution.