1. Introduction
Let 
 be a connected simple graph with 
n vertices and 
m edges. In 2017, Arumugam et al. [
1] and Bensmail et al. [
2] independently introduced the notation of local antimagic labeling of graphs. A bijection 
 is called a 
local antimagic labeling of 
G if any two adjacent vertices 
u and 
v in 
G satisfy 
, where 
, and 
 is the set of edges incident to 
u. It is clear that assigning 
 to 
x for each 
 naturally induces a proper vertex coloring of 
G, which is called a local antimagic coloring of 
G. A graph 
G is called local antimagic if 
G has a local antimagic labeling. The 
local antimagic chromatic number [
1] of 
G, denoted by 
, is the minimum number of colors taken over all colorings of 
G induced by local antimagic labelings of 
G.
Arumugam et al. [
1] presented the local antimagic chromatic numbers of some families of graphs, such as star 
, path 
, cycle 
, wheel 
, friendship graph 
, complete graph 
, complete bipartite graph 
 and the join graph 
, where 
G is a graph of order 
 and 
 is the complement graph of the complete graph 
. Meanwhile, many researchers have studied the local antimagic chromatic numbers of classes of many graphs. In [
3], Lau et al. gave counterexamples to the lower bound of 
 that was obtained in [
1]. Another counterexample was independently found by Shaebani [
4]. Lau et al. gave affirmative solutions on Problem 3.3 of [
1] and settled Theorem 2.15 of [
1]. Moreover, they also completely determined the local antimagic chromatic number of a complete bipartite graph. In [
5], Lau et al. presented some sufficient conditions for 
, where 
H is obtained from 
G by deleting or adding a certain edge. They then determined the exact values of the local antimagic chromatic numbers of many cycle-related join graphs. Nazula et al. [
6] determined the local antimagic chromatic number of unicyclic graphs. Premalatha et al. [
7] determined the local antimagic chromatic number of the corona product of two graphs, such as paths with null graphs. In [
8], Bača et al. estimated that for the bounds of the local antimagic chromatic number for disjoint union of multiple copies of a graph, there are trees and graphs with vertices of even degrees and with chromatic index 3. From the results proved by Haslegrave [
9], Bača et al. obtained that the local antimagic chromatic numbers of disjoint union of arbitrary graphs are finite if and only if none of these graphs contain an isolated edge as a subgraph.
Recently, Putri et al. [
10] extended this notion by labeling the vertices and edges of a graph 
G to establish a vertex coloring. The 
local antimagic total labeling on a graph 
G is defined to be an assignment 
 so that the weights of any two adjacent vertices 
u and 
v are distinct, that is, 
, where 
. Analogous to the local antimagic labeling, any local antimagic total labeling induces a proper vertex coloring of 
G, where the vertex 
x in 
G is assigned the color 
. The 
local antimagic total chromatic number of 
G, denoted by 
, is the minimum number of colors taken over all colorings induced by local antimagic total labelings of 
G. Clearly, 
 for any graph 
G. Putri et al. [
10] presented the local antimagic total chromatic numbers of some families tree, such as star, double star, banana tree graph, centipede graph, and the amalgamation of the star graph. In [
11], Kurniawati et al. determined the exact values of local antimagic total chromatic numbers of graphs 
, when 
G is the star, path, cycle and friendship graphs. Moreover, Kurniawati et al. [
12] determined the exact value of graphs 
, when 
G is the star, path, cycle and friendship graphs.
In this paper, we present the local antimagic total chromatic numbers of some wheel-related graphs, such as the fan graph , the bowknot graph , the Dutch windmill graph , the analogous Dutch windmill graph  and the flower graph .
  2. Main Results
In this section, we compute the local antimagic total chromatic numbers of some wheel-related graphs. In [
1], Arumugam et al. presented the exact value of 
 with three cases: (i) 
 for 
, (ii) 
 for 
 and (iii) 
 for 
. However, they only presented the range of 
 for 
. Then Lau et al. [
3] gave the exact value of 
 that 
 for 
. In [
5], Lau et al. corrected three errors of the local antimagic labeling for 
 and one error of the local antimagic labeling for 
. Arumugam et al. and Lau et al. completely determined the exact value of the local antimagic chromatic number of the wheel in the following lemma.
Lemma 1 ([
1,
3])
. For the wheel  of order , we have Lemma 2 ([
10])
. For any graph G, we have . The fan graph 
 of order 
 is obtained by deleting a rim edge of the wheel 
, where the central vertex of 
 is also the central vertex of 
. The fan graph 
 is shown in 
Figure 1. In fact, Slamin et al. [
13] in 2018 and Amalia et al. [
14] in 2021 presented the exact value of the local antimagic total chromatic number of the fan graph. However, the following local antimagic total labeling of the fan graph in Theorem 1 is different from that of these authors.
Theorem 1. For the fan graph  and , then .
 Proof.  Let 
 and 
 be vertex set and edge set of the fan graph, respectively. Then we obtain 
 and 
. It is clear that 
. In order to prove that 
, it suffices to prove that 
, which means that we should obtain a local antimagic total labeling using three distinct colors. Define 
. Let 
, and label the edges 
 for 
i such that 
 as follows:
        
Then label the remaining edges and vertices of graph . Let us discuss two cases for n.
From the above labelings, we have
        
Thus f is a local antimagic total labeling using three colors, and we obtain .
From the above labelings, we have
        
Thus f is a local antimagic total labeling using three colors, and we obtain . The proof is complete.    □
 All figures in this paper, the red front represents the local antimagic total labeling of edges and vertices of graph; other colors represent the sum of weights of vertex and the edges incident with the vertex in the local antimagic total labeling of graphs. Different colors are selected to clearly see the number of different colors of vertices in the figure.
Example 1. The local antimagic total labelings of the fan graph  and  are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The bowknot graph, denoted by , is the graph by gluing two central vertices of double fan graphs . Obviously, the bowknot graph  is obtained from the wheel  by deleting two edges every  edges on the rim of the wheel, and shown in Figure 4. It has  vertices and  edges.  Theorem 2. For the bowknot graph , we have .
 Proof.  Let  be the vertex set of graph , and let  be the edge set of . Since  is an induced subgraph of , we have . Define  and consider the following two cases.
Case 1. If n is odd.
Firstly, label the edges of 
 as follows:
        
Secondly, label the vertices of 
 by the following way:
        
It is clear that f is a local antimagic total labeling of  using three distinct colors and  for odd n.
Case 2. If n is even.
Label the edges of 
 as follows:
        
Then, give the exact values of the vertices of 
:
        
From above labelings under 
f, we obtain
        
Clearly, f is a local antimagic total labeling of  using three distinct colors and . Hence, we obtain  for , and the proof is completed.    □
 Example 2. Let  and . We have the local antimagic total labelings of the bowknot graph  and  in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The Dutch windmill graph, denoted by , is a graph of order  and size  by gluing a common vertex of n cycles . A example of the Dutch windmill graph is shown in Figure 7. Note that the Dutch windmill graph  is obtained from the wheel  by deleting one edge continuously every 2 edges on the rim of the wheel , and then delete the middle spoke edge of each vane in the resulting graph. Let  and  be the vertex and edge sets of graph , respectively.  Theorem 3. For the Dutch windmill graph , we have  Proof.  Obviously, the lower bound of the local antiamgic total chromatic number for graph  is two since . Then we consider the upper bound of .
Define . Let  be the sum of the weights of the vertex c and the edges incident with the vertex c and let  be the sum of the weights of the vertices  for . If we use the minimum weights, label the vertex c and the edges incident with the vertex c, then , and if we use the maximum weights, label the edges  and the vertices  for , then . Suppose that there is a local antiamgic total labeling using two distinct colors labeling the graph ; thus, the color of the vertex c is same as the vertices  for . It means  and so . When , there possibly is obtained a local antimagic total labeling f using two distinct colors such that the vertex c and the vertices  have the same color for . However, when , there must exist three different colors. Consider two cases as follows:
Case 1. For .
According to the parity of n, there are two subcases to confirm the exact values of the local antimagic total labeling.
Subcase 1. If n is odd.
Label the edges and vertices of the graph 
 by the following way:
        
From the above vertex weights, we have
        
Therefore, f is a local antimagic total labeling of the graph  using three distinct colors and so  for odd n.
Subcase 2. If n is even.
Label the edges and vertices of the graph 
 by the following way:
        
For the vertex weights under the labeling 
f, we have
        
The above arguments indicate that f is a local antimagic total labeling of  with three colors, and so  for even n.
Case 2. For .
Present the detailed local antimagic total labeling for each 
n when 
. The following figure is shown the local antimagic total labeling for 
 in 
Figure 8.
When , we obtain that  and  for . Similarly, when , we obtain that  and  for . When , we obtain that  and  for . Therefore .
When ,  and  for . Similarly, when ,  and  for . Therefore .
In conclusion, the local antimagic total chromatic number of the graph  is  for , and  for , respectively. The proof is done.    □
 Example 3. The local antimagic total labelings of the graph  and  are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10.  The analogous Dutch windmill graph, denoted by 
, is obtained from the Dutch windmill graph 
 by adding edges 
 for each 
. The graph 
 has 
 vertices and 
 edges. It can be seen that the analogous Dutch windmill graph 
 can be viewed as from the wheel 
 by deleting one edge continuously every 2 edges on the rim of the wheel. The analogous Dutch windmill graph 
 is shown in 
Figure 11.
Theorem 4. For the analogous Dutch windmill graph, , we have .
 Proof.  The lower bound of the local antimagic total chromatic number of graph  is 3 since  is an induced subgraph of graph  and . Define . We discuss two cases for the exact value of each vertex and edge as follows.
Case 1. If n is odd.
For 
, the local antimagic total labeling of the graph 
 is shown in 
Figure 12.
Label the edges of 
 by the following way:
        
Then label the vertices of 
 as follows:
        
For the vertex weights under the labeling 
f, we have
        
The above arguments indicate that f is a local antimagic labeling of  with three colors, and so  for odd n.
Case 2. If n is even.
We give the following exact values of edges of 
:
        
Then label the vertices as follows:
        
It is clear that f is a local antimagic total labeling of  using three colors and so  for even n. The proof is complete.    □
 Example 4. The local antimagic total labelings of the graph  and  are shown in Figure 13 and Figure 14.  The flower graph 
 of order 
 is a graph obtained by adjoining firstly a pendant edge to each vertex on the rim of the wheel graph 
, then joining every pendant vertex to the central vertex of 
 by an edge. The flower graph 
 is shown in 
Figure 15. Then we respectively obtain the lower and upper bounds of the local antimagic vertex total chromatic number of the flower graph 
.
Theorem 5. For the flower graph , we have  Proof.   for odd n and  for even n since  is the induced subgraph of graph . Then give the upper bound of the local antimigic total chromatic number of the flower graph.
The flower graph  has  vertices and  edges. The vertex set of  is  and the edge set of  is , where the edge  is the edge . Let f be the local antimagic labeling of the graph  defined in Lemma 1 such that the vertices are assigned four distinct colors for odd n and three colors for even n.
Define a bijection . Firstly, label the edges of the subgraph  of the  such that , where . Secondly, label the remaining edges and vertices of  using  since the wheel has  edges. Let us discuss two cases for n.
Case 1. If n is odd.
By Lemma 1, for 
, the vertex weights of graph 
 are, respectively, 
, 
 for odd 
i and 
, 
 for even 
i and 
. For 
, the vertex weights of graph 
 are, respectively, 
, 
 for odd 
i and 
, 
 for even 
i and 
. Then
        
Conclude the vertex weights under labeling g for each vertex of the graph  as follows:
It is clear that g is a local antimagic total labeling of the graph  using five colors, and so .
Case 2. If n is even.
By Lemma 1, for 
, the vertex weights of graph 
 are, respectively, 
 for odd 
i and 
 for even 
i and 
. For 
, the vertex weights of graph 
 are, respectively, 
 for odd 
i and 
, 
 for even 
i and 
. Then
        
Accordingly, we obtain the vertex weights under labeling g for each vertex of the graph .
Therefore g is a local antimagic total labeling of graph  with four colors and . The proof is done.    □
 Example 5. The local antimagic total labelings of the graph  and  are shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17.  Example 6. The local antimagic total labelings of the graph  and  are shown in Figure 18 and Figure 19.