Next Article in Journal
Development of a Predictive Tool to Support Environmentally Sustainable Management in Port Basins
Previous Article in Journal
Quality of Roof-Harvested Rainwater as a Function of Environmental and Air Pollution Factors in a Coastal Mediterranean City (Haifa, Israel)
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Water 2017, 9(11), 895;

Effect of Water Quality Sampling Approaches on Nitrate Load Predictions of a Prominent Regression-Based Model

Department of Energy and Environment, Government of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20002, USA
Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX 76502, USA
Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College park, MD 20740, USA
Branch of Geospatial Mapping and Technical Support, National Wetland Inventory, Falls Church, VA 22041, USA
U.S. Geological Survey, Dover, DE 19901, USA
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 October 2017 / Revised: 27 October 2017 / Accepted: 6 November 2017 / Published: 16 November 2017
PDF [3575 KB, uploaded 16 November 2017]


High frequency in-situ measurements of nitrate can greatly reduce uncertainty in nitrate flux estimates. Water quality databases maintained by various federal and state agencies often consist of pollutant concentration data obtained from periodic grab samples collected from gauged reaches of a stream. Regression models, such as the LOAD ESTimator (LOADEST), are frequently used to model variations in concentrations associated with changes in water discharge to provide integrated solute flux measurements. However, uncertainty in the relationships between nutrient concentration and flow may lead to errors in the corresponding flux estimates. In this study, a high frequency, in-situ measurement of nitrate concentration was implemented to ascertain uncertainty in the concentration/discharge relationship caused by nitrate hysteresis. It was found that observed nitrate hysteresis, as influenced by complex storm/watershed interactions, was not readily predictable. Therefore, it can lead to substantial nitrate flux uncertainty, based on periodic grab sample monitoring approaches. Scientists and engineers should take advantage of the proposed findings in future studies to enhance the quality of the associated decision making processes. View Full-Text
Keywords: hysteresis; in-situ measurements; LOADEST; Nitrogen; water quality sampling hysteresis; in-situ measurements; LOADEST; Nitrogen; water quality sampling

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharifi, A.; Yen, H.; Wallace, C.W.; McCarty, G.; Crow, W.; Momen, B.; Lang, M.W.; Sadeghi, A.; Lee, S.; Denver, J.; Rabenhorst, M.C. Effect of Water Quality Sampling Approaches on Nitrate Load Predictions of a Prominent Regression-Based Model. Water 2017, 9, 895.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top