Next Article in Journal
CO2 is Dominant Greenhouse Gas Emitted from Six Hydropower Reservoirs in Southeastern United States during Peak Summer Emissions
Next Article in Special Issue
Methodology for Selecting Best Management Practices Integrating Multiple Stakeholders and Criteria. Part 1: Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying Rainfall Interception Loss of a Subtropical Broadleaved Forest in Central Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimating Costs and Effectiveness of Upgrades in Forestry Best Management Practices for Stream Crossings
Open AccessArticle

The Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Design of Urban Stormwater Control Measures

U.S. Geological Survey—Wisconsin Water Science Center, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, WI 53562, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Kelly Morgan and Monica Ozores-Hampton
Water 2016, 8(1), 17;
Received: 20 October 2015 / Revised: 18 December 2015 / Accepted: 31 December 2015 / Published: 6 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue BMP Development, Implementation, and Performance)
An urban pollutant loading model was used to demonstrate how incorrect assumptions on the particle size distribution (PSD) in urban runoff can alter the design characteristics of stormwater control measures (SCMs) used to remove solids in stormwater. Field-measured PSD, although highly variable, is generally coarser than the widely-accepted PSD characterized by the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP). PSDs can be predicted based on environmental surrogate data. There were no appreciable differences in predicted PSD when grouped by season. Model simulations of a wet detention pond and catch basin showed a much smaller surface area is needed to achieve the same level of solids removal using the median value of field-measured PSD as compared to NURP PSD. Therefore, SCMs that used the NURP PSD in the design process could be unnecessarily oversized. The median of measured PSDs, although more site-specific than NURP PSDs, could still misrepresent the efficiency of an SCM because it may not adequately capture the variability of individual runoff events. Future pollutant loading models may account for this variability through regression with environmental surrogates, but until then, without proper site characterization, the adoption of a single PSD to represent all runoff conditions may result in SCMs that are under- or over-sized, rendering them ineffective or unnecessarily costly. View Full-Text
Keywords: particle size distribution; stormwater; urban; sediment; solids; pollutant model particle size distribution; stormwater; urban; sediment; solids; pollutant model
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Selbig, W.R.; Fienen, M.N.; Horwatich, J.A.; Bannerman, R.T. The Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Design of Urban Stormwater Control Measures. Water 2016, 8, 17.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop