Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Soil Salinization Characteristics in Coastal Area of Panjin City, Liaoning Province
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid ITSP-LSTM Approach for Stochastic Citrus Water Allocation Addressing Trade-Offs Between Hydrological-Economic Factors and Spatial Heterogeneity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial and Economic-Based Clustering of Greek Irrigation Water Organizations: A Data-Driven Framework for Sustainable Water Pricing and Policy Reform
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Dynamics of Virtual Water Trade in Crop Products Between Morocco and the European Union

Research in Economics and Management of Organisations Laboratory, National School of Business and Management, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(18), 2664; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17182664
Submission received: 15 July 2025 / Revised: 17 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Balancing Competing Demands for Sustainable Water Development)

Abstract

Morocco, located in an arid region and increasingly affected by climate change, faces chronic water stress. This structural vulnerability places mounting pressure on the country’s water resources. International trade contributes significantly to this pressure, particularly through the export of water-intensive agricultural products. This study investigates the virtual water trade flows of the 32 most-traded agricultural products between Morocco and its primary trading partner, the European Union, over the period of 2000–2020. This study adopts a bottom-up approach, employing the FAO’s CROPWAT 8.0 software based on the Penman–Monteith climatic model to estimate crop water requirements. The results indicate that Morocco was a net importer of virtual water in its agricultural trade with EU countries, with a cumulative net virtual water of 51,839.171 million cubic meters (Mm3). During the study period, Morocco exported a total of 3393.791 Mm3 of virtual water to the EU, primarily through fruits (2903.028 Mm3; 85.539%) and vegetables (467.928 Mm3; 13.788%), notably those with high water footprints. The top three EU importers of Moroccan virtual water were France (1138.785 Mm3), the Netherlands (874.323 Mm3), and the United Kingdom (430.872 Mm3). Conversely, virtual water imports by Morocco amounted to 55,232.963 Mm3, overwhelmingly dominated by cereals, which accounted for 99.697% of the total. These imports originated mainly from France (37,154.090 Mm3), Germany (4980.296 Mm3), and Poland (2330.039 Mm3). The analysis of Morocco’s virtual water balance with EU countries revealed that Morocco was a net virtual importer in trade with most of them. Furthermore, the crop-level virtual water trade balance revealed a tendency to export water-intensive crops that offer relatively low economic water productivity. However, four agricultural products recorded a high economic return per unit of Virtual Water Exported: tomatoes returned 19.80 USD/m3, strawberries 16.02 USD/m3, carrots 13.06 USD/m3, and watermelons 8.11 USD/m3. These findings underscore the importance of integrating water footprint analysis into national agricultural policy to maximize the economic productivity of water and ensure the sustainability of resources in a water-stressed country.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, human communities have searched for water. This essential resource has been in decline for a number of reasons, notably the negative impacts of climate change, the increase in human consumption of water and food due to the population explosion, and the overexploitation of water resources [1]. Water insecurity leads to food and energy insecurity. In 2015, the United Nations projected that half of the world’s population would be living in water-stressed regions by 2050 [2], while the World Economic Forum’s 2015 report considered water stress to be a global risk threatening international security [3], requiring real and urgent action to ensure integrated management of this scarce resource. Water’s scarcity makes it an economic good with distinctive characteristics. Accordingly, the OECD classified water as an “economic good” on the grounds that scarce economic resources have to be brought together to make water available in the form, quality, location, and timing required by users [4], similarly the fourth principle of the World Economic Forum’s 2015 report reinforces the notion of water’s scarcity and economic nature by declaring that water has “economic value in all its competing uses and should be recognized as an economic good” [5]. The economic nature of water has also been examined by authors such as Zisopoulou et al. [6], who demonstrated that water qualifies as an economic good in the sense defined by Robbins [7]. This is primarily due to its unique characteristics, notably its essential role in sustaining human life and its non-producible nature [8,9]. In Morocco, the inventory of water resources was estimated in 2023 at 22 billion m3 (18 billion m3 of surface water and 4 billion m3 of groundwater), equivalent to 606 m3 per capita per year [6]. However, water resources are unevenly distributed throughout the country. The Sebou, OumErbia, and Moulouya water basins account for over 60% of Morocco’s surface water resources, where most of the water is lost to the sea and is therefore unsuitable for agricultural use due to the limited arable land in these areas.
Water resource management in Morocco is governed by Law 36-15 on Water, and its implementation is carried out by the Hydraulic Basin Agencies (HBAs), which cover the entire national territory. These agencies participate in the execution of public policies in the water sector through substantial investments, guided by several strategies and programs, including the National Water Plan (NWP), the National Program for Water Saving in Irrigation (NPWSI), and the National Program for Drinking Water Supply and Irrigation (NPDWSI). These initiatives aim to ensure the integrated management of water resources and the rationalization of their use.
Despite all efforts to protect Morocco’s water resources, their inventory has been severely depleted in recent years as a result of several factors, including successive years of drought, rapid population growth, and the overexploitation of water resources by various economic sectors, particularly agriculture. The quantity available per inhabitant has fallen from 2500 cubic meters per year in 1960 to less than 650 cubic meters in 2023, and is expected to drop to about 500 cubic meters by 2030, placing Morocco among the countries experiencing “water scarcity” after previously being classified as in a situation of “water stress.” Losses through evapotranspiration, estimated at 118 billion m3 [6], and the decline in dam storage capacity due to the silting of reservoirs, resulting in a loss of almost 75 million m3 per year [7], are also factors exacerbating the water resources situation in Morocco. Meanwhile, Gumus et al. [8] analyzed potential scenarios for assessing the impact of drought on Morocco’s water resources, with the most pessimistic scenario estimating that drought in the northern region of Morocco will reach around 80% on average after 2075. This situation could have severe socio-economic consequences, increasing desertification [9], poverty, hunger, and social crises [10], in the face of growing water demand from various economic sectors [11,12].
The importance of water resources for the Moroccan economy is particularly evident in the dependence of economic sectors on water, especially the agricultural sector, which accounted for around 12% of Morocco’s GDP in 2024 and is a key contributor to the country’s foreign trade. The EU market alone absorbs an average of 67% of Moroccan agricultural exports [13]. Statistically, Morocco’s foreign trade data show that the EU is Morocco’s leading partner, accounting for 86.5% of trade, making the EU both Morocco’s main supplier and its main customer [14]. Trade with the EU was expected to reach 62 billion USD in 2023. Spain, France, Italy, and Germany are the EU countries that trade most extensively with Morocco. The first agreements between Morocco and the EU were signed in the 2000s, starting with an association agreement that allowed the abolition of customs duties on industrial products. In 2010, an agricultural agreement was signed between the two partners and came into force in 2012, with the aim of increasing bilateral trade in agricultural, agri-food, and fishery products. By 2023, Moroccan agricultural and agri-food exports had reached 8.2 billion USD, ranking third after automobile exports and exports of phosphate and its derivatives [14]. The majority of these agricultural exports were destined for the EU, making Morocco the EU’s leading supplier of vegetables and its third-largest extra-EU supplier of citrus fruits [15]. At the regional level, Morocco is the top exporter of agricultural products from the southern Mediterranean to the EU. For example, exports of fresh tomatoes to the EU increased from 660 million USD in 2021 to 942 million USD in 2023, a rise of 42% in two years, representing 82% of Morocco’s total exports of fresh tomatoes to the EU [14].
Boosting exports of agricultural produce is the result of an agricultural policy launched in 2008 under the name of the Green Morocco Plan. This policy aimed to encourage farmers to focus on export crops while subsidizing their production, mobilizing 11.30 billion USD in cumulative investment over a 10-year period after the strategy was launched [13]. Statistically, fresh tomato exports increased from 303 million USD in 2009 to 1.14 billion USD in 2023, while citrus exports grew from 311.9 million USD in 2009 to 456.5 million USD in 2023 [14]. Like other crops subsidized under the Green Morocco Plan, these crops are water-intensive and deplete Morocco’s water resources. Many studies [12,16] have analyzed the impact of agricultural policies in Morocco on the stock of these resources. In this regard, Molle [16] found a major discrepancy between Morocco’s agricultural policy (Green Morocco Plan 2008–2020) and its water policies, noting that subsidized agriculture has overexploited groundwater. Saidi et al. [17] showed that the crops prioritized by the GMP (citrus, olives, and fruits) are characterized by high water consumption, indicating that the policy’s underlying choices were not sufficiently well studied. In the same context, Boudhar et al. [18], using an input–output model, studied the relationships between economic sectors and the use of water resources (direct use), as well as the intersectoral relationships involving water (indirect use). They found that 86% of direct water use is consumed by the agricultural sector, illustrating the sector’s dominant role in water consumption.
The present work analyzes the flow of virtual water trade between Morocco and EU countries for 32 agricultural products over the period of 2000–2020, with the purpose of assessing the impact of agricultural trade with the EU on Morocco’s water resources, while also evaluating the economic productivity of water use.
Section 2 provides a literature review on the economic foundations of virtual water trade and the various studies conducted in the Morocco–EU context. Section 3 presents the methods and data used in the empirical analysis. Section 4 reports the results of the empirical analysis and concludes with a general discussion and recommendations.

2. Literature Review

The impact of water scarcity on the global economy is one of the most pressing topics in international agricultural trade today. At a time when the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund are encouraging countries to further liberalize their foreign trade to promote economic development and growth, it is essential to take into account the issue of water scarcity, as these resources are critical not only for the development of the agricultural sector but also for industrialization and the service sector.
Conceptually, virtual water trade has its economic roots in international trade theories. In The Wealth of Nations (1776), Smith introduced the idea of free trade through the specialization of each country in the production where it holds an absolute advantage, focusing on producing the lowest-cost goods and improving productivity and production methods. A few decades later, Ricardo (1817) developed the theory of comparative advantage to address the limitations of the absolute advantage theory. According to Ricardo, each country should specialize in producing the goods for which it has the greatest comparative advantage or, conversely, the least comparative disadvantage. The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson (HOS) model subsequently added a new dimension to classical and neoclassical analyses of international trade: the concept of the “relative abundance of a factor of production,” which acts as a source of comparative advantage and determines trade patterns according to the factor endowments of the trading countries.
From the same perspective, J.A. Allan, a British geographer, coined the concept of virtual water trade in the 1990s as an alternative means for countries to prevent conflicts over water resources, particularly in the Middle East, and to access global water availability indirectly and at low cost [19]. This concept can be defined as the total volume of water consumed during a production process to produce a good that will be exported to another region, where it will ultimately be consumed.
Merrett [20] analyzed the concept of virtual water trade within an economic framework as a creative extension of economic theories. Similarly, Lant [21] concluded that there is a close link between virtual water trade and Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage. In fact, the relative abundance of water, together with a comparison of full costs between different trading partners, can generate a regional comparative advantage in the water sector [22,23].
The literature on virtual water trade has been widely developed. However, the USA, China, and the Netherlands remain the most productive countries in terms of publications and research on the subject [24]. This research is highly diversified, analyzing virtual water flows at global, national, and regional scales, including flows between cities, provinces, and river basins [25].
In Europe, several studies have examined virtual water trade. Serrano et al. [26] investigated virtual water trade for EU countries, finding that European countries imported 585 km3 of water in their trade with the rest of the world. At the intra-regional scale, Antonellia et al. [27] assessed the trade in virtual water embedded in agricultural products between EU countries during the period of 1993–2011. They found that the European Union is a net importer of virtual water, with 46% of imports and 75% of exports occurring within the region. To measure the role of virtual water in the food security of EU countries, Alexoaei et al. [28] showed that the agricultural products they analyzed depended on virtual water trade, with percentages varying from one product to another. Fu et al. [29] applied a multi-regional input–output model to assess virtual water flows between 43 countries, including EU members. They found that economic and trade relations significantly influence virtual water flows, with countries such as the UK, China, and the USA showing a high dependence on virtual water flows with the EU. At the river basin level, Vanham [30] established the water balance for agricultural products in EU river basins. Other researchers have explored the relationship between virtual water trade and other dimensions, such as CO2 emissions within the EU [31] and electricity use [32] at the European level.
In the Moroccan context, research on virtual water trade remains limited. The first study in this field was conducted by Hoekstra and Chapagain [33], who analyzed the virtual water trade between Morocco and the Netherlands. Their calculations showed that Morocco depends on the Netherlands’ resources for 14% of its virtual water needs, while the Netherlands depends on Morocco for 95% of its own. The authors concluded that trade between the two countries allows Morocco to save a substantial volume of water, estimated at 780 million m3 per year.
Schyns and Hoekstra [34] also quantified Morocco’s water footprint over the period of 1996–2005 to propose scenarios for efficient water resource management. They found that the total water footprint production was 38.8 Gm3 per year, dominated by the agricultural sector, which alone consumes the largest share of water.
Other studies have been carried out on a continental or regional scale including Morocco. For example, Hriwa et al. [35] analyzed virtual water trade flows in Africa and found that Morocco overexploits its water resources but remains a net importer of virtual water, ranking among the top ten net virtual water importing countries, with 190.32 Bm3.
Boudhar et al. [36] constructed a virtual water trade balance for Morocco by examining virtual water trade flows over the period of 2000–2017 for 40 agricultural products. The authors noted that Morocco was a net importer of virtual water during the study period, with a net virtual water balance of 595.74 Gm3, virtual water exports of 95.03 Gm3, and total imports of 690.77 Gm3.
Regarding intra-regional flows, Haddad et al. [37] used an inter-regional input–output model to evaluate virtual water exchanges between various regions of Morocco, analyzing the relationship between these exchanges and the creation of added value at the regional level. They found that the total volume of water incorporated into trade between regions exceeded foreign exports and revealed that certain regions exerted pressure on their water resources despite low participation in added value.
However, no study in the literature has examined Morocco’s virtual water trade flows with its commercial and economic partners, particularly major partners such as the European Union, making this work an important contribution to the still underdeveloped literature on virtual water trade in Morocco.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Study Area

Morocco, located in the northwest of Africa, covers a surface area of 446,550 km2 and has a population of approximately 38 million. The country’s climate is predominantly semi-arid but varies considerably across regions due to diverse topography. The northern and northwestern coastal zones experience a Mediterranean climate, characterized by mild, wet winters and hot, dry summers. In contrast, the interior plains and plateaus are subject to a semi-arid continental climate with greater temperature variability. The southern and eastern areas, especially those near the Sahara Desert, exhibit arid to hyper-arid conditions, with annual precipitation often below 150 mm. Rainfall is highly variable both spatially and temporally and is mostly concentrated during the winter months. This climatic heterogeneity significantly affects the distribution of water resources and agricultural potential across the country.
As shown in Figure 1, the other side of this analysis lies the European Union, established in 1957 by the Treaty of Rome and further consolidated by the Maastricht Treaty in 1993. The EU is a political and economic union of 28 member states (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, prior to its departure in 2020). Member countries share common policies in key sectors such as trade, agriculture, and environmental management. The EU spans a wide range of climatic zones, with an average annual temperature of approximately 16 °C, around +2.2 to +3.0 °C above pre-industrial levels (1850–1900) [38], and an average annual precipitation of about 756 mm. Precipitation tends to increase in northern Europe and decline in the Mediterranean region [38]. The EU is traversed by major rivers such as the Rhine, Danube, Elbe, Seine, and Pô, which are essential to agriculture, energy production, and transportation. The Danube, stretching 2860 km, is the longest river in the EU, crossing ten countries. In this context, climate and water are strategic issues for the environmental resilience of the Union.
The EU is Morocco’s largest trading partner, particularly in agri-food products, making bilateral virtual water flows a critical dimension of water sustainability and agricultural policy. The geographic and climatic contrast between the two regions makes the EU–Morocco corridor an ideal case study for assessing virtual water trade, resource-use efficiency, and the environmental externalities of agricultural exchanges.

3.2. Variables

3.2.1. Estimation of the Water Footprint of Crops (WF)

The crop water requirement is the amount of water needed by the crop to reach production-stage maturity in order to compensate for water lost through evapotranspiration (ETc) [39]. Evapotranspiration (ETc) refers to the loss of water after irrigation through the processes of evaporation (water cycle) and transpiration, which involves plant physiological structures called stomata. Evapotranspiration (ETc) depends on several physiological characteristics, such as leaf area, plant species, variety, stage of crop development, and others, which are collectively summarized by the crop coefficient (Kc), as well as pedoclimatic factors. The FAO Penman–Monteith model enables evapotranspiration to be calculated with reference to the time-dependent reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo, mm/day) and the time-dependent crop coefficient (Kc) [40,41,42]:
E T c = K c × E T 0
Crop water requirements are estimated using the Penman–Monteith model, with reference evapotranspiration calculated according to the following equation [43]:
E T 0 =   0.408   R n G + γ C n T + 273 u 2 ( e s e a ) + γ ( 1 + C d u 2 )
where ET0 refers the reference evapotranspiration, Rn is the radiation at the crop surface, G is the soil heat flux density at the soil surface, T is the mean daily or hourly air temperature at 1.5 to 2.5 m height, u2 is the mean daily or hourly wind speed at 2 m height, es is the saturation vapor pressure at 1.5 to 2.5 m height calculated for daily time steps as the average of saturation vapor pressure at maximum and minimum air temperature and for hourly time steps using hourly average air temperature, ea is the mean actual vapor pressure at 1.5 to 2.5 m height, Δ is the slope of the saturation vapor pressure–temperature curve, γ is the psychrometric constant, and Cn and Cd are, respectively, the numerator and the denominator constant, which change with the calculation time step.
Water footprints for each crop c have been calculated using the FAO’s CROPWAT 8.0 software, where Crop Water Requirements correspond to cultural coefficients ETc:
E T c =   C W R

3.2.2. Estimation of Global Virtual Water Imports and Exports

Global Virtual Water Imports (GVWI) and Exports (GVWE) between Morocco i and European Union countries j are the totals of all volumes imported and exported from all crops c during the study period, expressed in m3:
G V W I = c j V W I c , j i
G V W E = c j V W E c , i j
where V W I c , j i and V W E c , i j are the volumes of Virtual Water Imported and Exported, respectively, and dependent on crops c, Morocco i and European Union country j.
The flows V W I c , j i and V W E c , i j are expressed in m3 and calculated by multiplying the total annual quantity of crop c imported ( Q m j i ) from EU country j to Morocco i or exported ( Q e i j ) from Morocco i to an EU country j, expressed in (ton/year) by the water footprint, which is the water content required to produce one ton of this crop (WFc) expressed in (m3/ton):
V W I c ,   j i = c Q m j i × W F c
V W E c ,   i j = c Q e i j   × W F c
Expressed in m3/ton, this water footprint also depends on the crop water requirements (m3/ha) and on the crop yield (Yc) (ton/ha), obtained as follows:
W F c = C W R c Y c
where CWRc (m3/ha) is the quantity of water used by a crop c during its entire growing period. This quantity of water used is calculated using Cropwat 8.0 software by accumulating the daily evapotranspiration ET0 (mm/day) for the growing period of crop c and multiplying by 10 to convert the values (mm) into volume per area (m3/ha):
C W R c = 10 × d = 1 c g p E T 0
And the yield of each crop c (Yc) is the ratio for the production of this crop (Pc) (ton) divided by the cultivated area (CAc) (ha):
Y c = p c C A c

3.2.3. Estimation of the Global Net Virtual Water

The water balance of virtual water trade between Morocco and European Union countries (GNVW) is the value of Global Virtual Water Exported (GVWE) minus the value of Global Virtual Water Imported (GVWI). It can have a positive sign (Net Importer) or a negative sign (Net Exporter):
G N V W   =   G V W E G V W I

3.2.4. Water Economic Productivity

The Economic Water Productivity measures the profitability of the Virtual Water Exported by each crop, expressed in (USD/m3); it is calculated by dividing the Export Value of crop c (EVc, USD) by the volume of Virtual Water Exported from this crop (VWEc, m3). This is stated mathematically as follows:
W E P = E V c V W E c

3.3. Data

CLIMWAT 2.0 and CROPWAT 8.0 are two software packages developed by the FAO that enable users to calculate crop water requirements and determine irrigation schedules [44,45]. Specifically, the CLIMWAT 2.0 database compiles extensive climatic data from numerous meteorological stations across 146 countries. The data used for the CROPWAT 8.0 software are presented in Table 1.
This work evaluates the volume of virtual water traded for 32 agricultural products between Morocco and the European Union, represented by its 28 member countries, over the period from 2000 to 2020. The calculations were carried out for all European Union countries prior to Brexit and the United Kingdom’s departure from the Union in 2020. As shown in Figure 2, data on the quantities of agricultural products imported and exported, as well as the monetary values of agricultural exports, were taken from the UN Comtrade database [50], while the yield of each agricultural product was sourced from the FAOSTAT database of the FAO [51]. All climatic data were extracted from the CLIMWAT 2.0 and CROPWAT 8.0 databases, which compile data from meteorological stations covering the entirety of Morocco.

4. Results

4.1. Analysis of Virtual Water Exports Through Morocco’s Trade with EU Countries

The results of this study show that the total volume of Virtual Water Exported (VWE) by the agricultural products studied for European Union countries over the period of 2000–2020 is estimated at 3393.791 Mm3, with an average of 161.581 Mm3 per year. Our calculations indicate that the lowest quantity of Virtual Water Exported was 114.572 Mm3 in 2012, while the highest quantity was 222.481 Mm3 in 2020. Figure 3 shows an increase in virtual water exports that varies each year, mainly due to large exports of fruits and vegetables with a high water footprint.
In terms of categories, fruits and vegetables are the main exporters of virtual water, with volumes of 2903.028 Mm3 and 467.928 Mm3 for fruits and vegetables, respectively, representing a total of 99.327% of Virtual Water Exported during the study period (85.539% for fruits and 13.788% for vegetables). However, pulses and cereals accounted for only 0.673% of the Virtual Water Exported, with 19.647 Mm3 for pulses and 3.166 Mm3 for cereals.
Table 2 shows that the most important exporters of virtual water are citrus fruits, with a total volume of 2499.043 Mm3. Mandarins and clementines represent a volume of 1258.973 Mm3, oranges 1201.46 Mm3, lemons 29.418 Mm3, and pomelos 9.19 Mm3. Grapes follow, exporting a volume of 148 Mm3 of virtual water. The arboriculture sector has recorded an increase in virtual water exports following the development of avocado cultivation in recent decades. The volume of virtual water embodied in avocados exported to European Union countries increased from 0.511 Mm3 in 2012 to 29.670 Mm3 in 2020, an impressive increase of 57.06% over 9 years. Plums, on the other hand, are the fruits exporting the smallest amount of virtual water to European Union countries, with total exports not exceeding 0.187 Mm3 during the period of 2000–2020 (Figure 4a).
As shown in Figure 4b vegetable exports of fresh tomatoes to European Union countries rose sharply from 2006 to 2020. The total volume of Virtual Water Exported through fresh tomatoes from 2000 to 2020 reached 350.99 Mm3, representing 75% of virtual water exports by vegetables. Potatoes follow with 76.55 Mm3 of Virtual Water Exported, then asparagus with 10.744 Mm3 and onions with 10.407 Mm3, while carrots are the vegetables with the smallest amount of Virtual Water Exported (0.259 Mm3).
It should be noted that during the study period, virtual water exports were boosted by the export of fresh tomatoes, which are considered a high-value crop under the Green Morocco Plan (GMP) strategy, whereas potato exports declined over time.
The third category of virtual water exporting crops in this study is pulses, with a volume of 19.467 Mm3. Figure 4c shows that the Virtual Water Exported by pulses was mainly represented by fresh peas 9.697 Mm3, dry beans 4.611 Mm3, and broad beans 3.335 Mm3. Trade in virtual water through pulses to European Union countries fluctuated between 2000 and 2013, then declined between 2014 and 2020 due to weak European market demand for Moroccan pulses and the orientation of Moroccan agricultural policy towards export crops. However, the significant virtual water volume associated with peas, particularly in 2013, can be attributed to a peak in export volumes during that year. Notably, Belgium alone accounted for approximately 62% (7506 tons) of Moroccan pea exports in 2013, resulting in a temporary surge in virtual water exports linked to peas.
Regarding cereals, our calculations show that only 4 of the 28 European Union countries (Belgium, France, Italy, and Spain) imported Moroccan cereals. Representing 3.166 Mm3, the volume of Virtual Water Exported by cereals accounts for only 0.109% of the total Virtual Water Exported during the study period (61.146% wheat, 38.181% maize, and no virtual water export for barley and oats). As shown in Figure 4d the relatively high share of wheat within cereal-related virtual water exports is largely due to a peak observed in 2017, when favorable climatic conditions, particularly the 327 mm of rainfall recorded that year, resulted in a strong cereal harvest. This led to an increase in national wheat production and export capacity, ultimately causing a temporary surge in the volume of virtual water embodied in wheat exports.

Analysis of Moroccan Virtual Water Exports Across the EU28 Countries

The main EU28 countries importing Moroccan virtual water are generally Morocco’s first customers. Table 3 illustrates that France, the Netherlands, UK, Spain, and Sweden accounted for 85.636% of virtual water exports (France 1138.785 Mm3, Netherlands 874.323 Mm3, UK 430.872 Mm3, Spain 281.606 Mm3, Sweden 180.233 Mm3). As shown in Figure 5, Croatia and Romania are the least significant importers of Moroccan virtual water, with volumes of 0.015 Mm3 and 0.021 Mm3, respectively, while virtual water exports to Bulgaria and Luxembourg are practically nil.
The large volume of virtual water exports is primarily derived from fruits and vegetables. For instance, France, the leading importer of Moroccan virtual water, received an estimated total volume of 1138.785 Mm3 over the period of 2000–2020. This total comprises 774.284 Mm3 from fruits, 354.631 Mm3 from vegetables, 8.062 Mm3 from pulses, and 1.807 Mm3 from cereals, representing 33.560% of the Virtual Water Exported to all EU28 countries.

4.2. Analysis of Virtual Water Imports Through Morocco’s Trade with EU Countries

The cumulative volume of Virtual Water Imported from European Union countries for the studied crops over the period of 2000–2020 amounted to 55,232.963 Mm3. Figure 6 shows that the largest annual import volume was recorded in 2016, reaching 5848.356 Mm3, while the smallest occurred in 2018, with 996.814 Mm3. The average annual virtual water import over the period was approximately 2630.052 Mm3. The quantity of imported virtual water decreased from 2000 to 2006, then gradually increased to peak in 2016 before declining sharply in 2018 and rising again through 2020. This decline can be attributed to agricultural factors, as Morocco experienced a series of favorable rainy seasons leading to strong agricultural production, as well as to political factors, notably diplomatic tensions impacting agricultural trade under the free trade agreement with the European Union.
As shown in Table 4, more than 99.697% of the Virtual Water Imported by various European Union countries comes from cereals, with a total volume of 55,065.975 Mm3, followed by vegetables 83.207 Mm3, fruits 79.393 Mm3, and pulses 4.386 Mm3. Wheat and barley are the main agricultural products importing virtual water into Morocco, with virtual water volumes of 52,346.877 Mm3 and 2413.738 Mm3, respectively.
As shown in Figure 7a, wheat is the cereal crop that dominates all imported virtual water volumes, accounting for 94.781%. On average, Morocco imported an estimated 2492.708 Mm3 of virtual water embodied in wheat. The largest quantity of virtual water imports was 5525.742 Mm3 in 2016, and the smallest quantity was 900.093 Mm3 in 2018.
The decrease in wheat imports in 2018 is explained by Morocco’s shift to other wheat-exporting countries, notably Ukraine and Russia, following the impact on the free trade agreement caused by the political conflict between the two economic partners (Morocco–EU), as well as by Morocco’s high cereal production during this period, which reached 73.3 million quintals of wheat. The second most important cereal importing virtual water is barley, with an average annual volume of 114.939 Mm3. Morocco’s high level of cereal imports is justified by the insufficiency of domestic production to meet the demand of the Moroccan market, particularly for wheat, a staple food in the Moroccan diet.
Potatoes and onions are the main vegetables imported by Morocco from the EU28 countries, with calculated volumes of 80.206 Mm3 and 2.199 Mm3 for potatoes and onions, respectively. Of the 75.560 Mm3 of Virtual Water Imported by fruits into Morocco, 36.182 Mm3 (47.885%) is accounted for by avocados, followed by apples, which account for 35.942 Mm3 (0.475%) of the Virtual Water Imported by fruit. Pulses are the crops containing the least virtual water imports, mainly represented by dried lentils (2.862 Mm3) and dried beans (1.509 Mm3).

Analysis of Virtual Water Imports from EU28 Counties

Most virtual water imports originate from European cereal-producing countries. Statistically, 37,154.090 million m3 of Virtual Water Imported comes from Morocco’s leading trading partner, France, which accounts for 67.267%. Table 5 shows that the second and third largest EU28 countries exporting virtual water to Morocco are Germany (4980.296 Mm3, 9.016%) and Poland (2330.039 Mm3, 4.218%). Around 10% of virtual water imports come from three Eastern European countries: Romania, Bulgaria, and Lithuania, with volumes of 2113.087 Mm3, 2055.783 Mm3, and 1569.317 Mm3, respectively. Figure 8 shows that during the study period, Luxembourg and Portugal exported only 0.019 Mm3 and 0.959 Mm3 to Morocco, making them the countries from which Morocco imported the least virtual water, while Malta and Slovenia imported no virtual water at all.

4.3. Global Net Virtual Water

In relation to the countries of the European Union, Morocco was a net importer of virtual water over the period of 2000–2020, with a volume of 51,839.171 Mm3. Figure 9 shows that the water-intensive cereal imports accounted for the bulk of the net virtual water. Fluctuations in the water balance over time showed that the virtual water balance was always positive, with an average of 2468.470 Mm3/year. The largest net virtual water volume was recorded in 2016 with 5682.882 Mm3, and the smallest net virtual water volume was 802.672 Mm3, recorded in 2018.

4.3.1. Analysis of Net Virtual Water by Crop Category

The results for net virtual water by crop category show that Morocco is a net virtual water exporter for vegetables and fruits, as well as for the pulses studied in this work, while it is a net virtual water importer for all types of cereals. The net virtual water export was 15.29 Mm3 for pulses, 384.74 Mm3 for vegetables, mainly fresh tomatoes, with an estimated net virtual water export of 350.98 Mm3, and 2823.63 Mm3 for fruit, of which mandarins account for 1258.84 Mm3. For cereals, the net virtual water import was 55,062.80 Mm3, with wheat accounting for 52,344.94 Mm3 as shown in Figure 10a. These findings show that Morocco’s agricultural policy, in particular the Green Morocco Plan, tends to export the most water-intensive crops, essentially fruits and vegetables such as fresh tomatoes, citrus fruit, avocado, artichokes, asparagus, and strawberries, which explains the virtual water surplus in the water balance of these crops. Even though cereals are a major source of virtual water imports from the European Union, the growing export of water-intensive crops means that Morocco’s water shortage situation is set to worsen, especially in a climate marked by significant rises in temperature, falling rainfall, and groundwater depletion.

4.3.2. Analysis of Net Virtual Water by EU28 Countries

According to this study, the virtual water trade in agricultural products shows that Morocco is a net importer of virtual water for the majority of EU28 countries. As shown in Figure 11, the water balance over the study period was 36,015.305 Mm3 with France, 4875.027 Mm3 with Germany, 2311.069 Mm3 with Poland, 2113.066 Mm3 with Romania, and 2055.783 Mm3 with Bulgaria. Nevertheless, Table 6 shows that Morocco was a net exporter of virtual water with five countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, Malta, and Slovenia, with net virtual water exports of 754.295 Mm3, 48.886 Mm3, 18.645 Mm3, 0.154 Mm3, and 0.095 Mm3, respectively.

4.4. Results of the Water Economic Productivity

Our analysis of the economic productivity of water for the agricultural products studied in this paper showed a variation in virtual water profitability ranging from 0.005 USD/m3 to 19.80 USD/m3. Among the 32 agricultural products, four recorded a high income per cubic meter of Virtual Water Exported. Tomatoes returned 19.80 USD/m3 exported, strawberries 16.02 USD/m3, carrots 13.06 USD/m3, and watermelons 8.11 USD/m3, while cereals were the crops with the lowest financial return.
Figure 12 shows that artichokes, wheat, citrus fruits, dates, and olives are crops that consume a lot of water but do not generate profits proportional to the volume of water exported through these agricultural products. Mandarins, which are among the leading virtual water-exporting fruits to EU countries, generate a low economic productivity of 1.62 USD/m3. However, the increase in avocado production shows that this crop does not generate a remarkable benefit when compared with the water requirement for its cultivation. Caro et al. [52] classified Morocco in 2016 as the seventh-largest avocado-exporting country in the world with a cost of 0.54 m3/USD. Most Moroccan avocado is exported to Spain, France, and Germany, European Union countries where the total renewable water resources range between 24 and 26 billion m3. These countries benefit from significant green water availability, largely influenced by annual precipitation levels of 705 mm in Spain, 1238 mm in France, and 1003 mm in Germany. Green water, defined as the portion of rainfall stored in the soil and directly available for plant growth, is therefore more abundant in these regions compared to Morocco, which had an estimated renewable water availability of only 22 billion m3 and an annual precipitation of just 224 mm in 2024. Green water use represents about 68% of the aggregate water footprint in the EU27 [26]. France and Germany, among the seven member states, including France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Romania, Poland, and Great Britain, account for 72% of the green water footprint within the EU27 [26]. This contrast highlights a major inconsistency between Morocco’s water policy, which promotes sustainable resource management under growing water stress, and its agricultural policy, which encourages the export of water-intensive crops.
For each agricultural product, the results of the economic productivity of water revealed a variation in the profit generated by the export of virtual water to the European Union, with an overuse of water resources in Morocco yielding a generally limited return in terms of dollar value per unit of exported water, with the exception of tomatoes, strawberries, carrots, and watermelons, which generate a high economic return.

5. Discussion

Our analysis of virtual water trade between Morocco and its trade partners over the period of 2000–2020 has shown that the results are different from those found in previous studies, due to a number of reasons, such as those relating to technical aspects, i.e., the types of agricultural crops included, the study period, the origin of the data, and the method used, and also reasons of a political economic nature, such as the impact of the choice of agricultural policy on the agricultural production of countries, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements concluded, market dynamics, trade flows, and also the availability of water, which influences the type of crop adapted. In previous limited studies on virtual water trade in Morocco, Hoekstra and Chapagain [33] took into account livestock products and a wide range of agricultural products in their calculation of the virtual water of Morocco and the Netherlands in the period of 1997–2001. They found that Morocco exported 1.6 billion m3/year and imported 6.3 billion m3/year. Schyns and Hoekstra [34] also considered livestock products in the calculation of the water footprint and industrial commodities, showing that Morocco imported during the period of 1996–2005 a volume of 12.643 Mm3/year and exported a volume of 1.333 Mm3/year, with an economic return of 0.87 USD/m3 on average. In their analysis of virtual water in the African context, Hriwa et al. [35] found that Morocco had an NVWI of 190.32 Bm3 during the period of 2000–2020. Boudhar et al. [36] evaluated virtual water trade for 40 agricultural products over the period of 2000–2017, showing that Morocco exported 95.03 Gm3 and imported 595.74 Gm3. Unlike previous studies, which studied Morocco’s virtual water trade with the rest of the world, the present work focuses on virtual water trade with an economic aggregate and a major trading partner of Morocco that has signed a free trade agreement for agricultural products. This study also considers only the most traded products between the two trading partners in a period of time that was characterized by the launch of a major agricultural policy, the “Green Morocco Plan,” in order to transform Moroccan agriculture into an exporting and revenue-generating sector.
The present study found that Morocco is a net importer of virtual water in relation to the majority of European Union countries, with an estimated net virtual water of 51,839.171 Mm3,thereby enabling the conservation of substantial volumes of water, notably through the importation of cereals, but has a net export balance with Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, and the Netherlands. Given its geographical location, Morocco exports more water-consuming crops to European Union countries, particularly major partners such as France, the Netherlands, the UK, and Sweden, primarily through fruits and vegetables. These countries are generally considered humid and possess extensive hydrological networks, France is served by major rivers such as the Seine, Loire, and Rhône, providing a renewable water resource of approximately 210 billion m3 per year, the Netherlands relies heavily on the Rhine and Meuse rivers along with an extensive canal system, with around 90 billion m3 of renewable water resources, the UK benefits from river systems like the Thames and Severn, with about 120 billion m3 of available water annually, and Sweden, rich in lakes and rivers such as the Göta älv and Dalälven, has renewable water resources estimated at 160 billion m3 per year.In contrast, Morocco’s main rivers, including the Oum Er-Rbia, Sebou, Moulouya, Tensift, and Draa, collectively contribute to a renewable water availability of only about 18 billion m3 annually, highlighting the stark disparity in water endowment between Morocco and its main agricultural trade partners.
Despite exporting significant volumes of virtual water embedded in fruits and vegetables to these countries, the economic productivity of this water remains insufficient when considering the real value of water in a water-scarce country like Morocco. Hriwa et al. [35] found that water stress in Morocco exceeds 60–70%, indicating a structural pressure on water resources, particularly on blue water used for irrigation. The large volumes of virtual water export contribute to substantial pressure on Morocco’s limited water resources, with relatively limited economic returns compared to the water scarcity challenges faced nationally.

6. Conclusions and Policy Implication

This paper used the concept of virtual water to analyze Morocco’s international trade flows with European Union countries for 32 agricultural products over the period of 2000–2020, with the aim of understanding the policy direction of Moroccan agriculture and identifying new approaches to alleviate pressure on water resources and ensure their sustainability. Our findings are as follows:
  • Over the period of 2000–2020, Morocco was a net importer of virtual water, with a total volume of 51,839.171 Mm3. Imports of virtual water from European Union countries were estimated at 55,232.963 Mm3. Cereals represented the largest share of imported virtual water (55,065.975 Mm3, 99.69%), predominantly wheat, which is a staple food in the Moroccan diet. France, Germany, and Poland were the leading EU exporters of virtual water to Morocco. The growing reliance on wheat imports could place Morocco in a position of food dependence on other countries, particularly France and Germany. In contrast, Morocco exported a total of 3393.791 Mm3 of virtual water to European Union countries over the same period. The volume of virtual water exports exhibited a variable upward trend throughout the study period. Morocco’s virtual water exports to the EU28 were dominated by fruits (2903.028 Mm3, 85.53%) and vegetables (467.948 Mm3, 13.78%), respectively. France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom were the principal importers of Moroccan virtual water.
  • Morocco’s net virtual water exchange with the European Union revealed a surplus for vegetables (384.74 Mm3), pulses (15.29 Mm3), and fruits (2823.63 Mm3), indicating a net export position for these categories. Conversely, cereals exhibited a substantial net import of virtual water amounting to 55,062.80 Mm3, predominantly driven by wheat imports (52,344.94 Mm3), which accounted for 95% of the category’s total net imports.
  • Morocco was a net importer of virtual water from 23 out of the 28 EU member states, with the largest net import volumes recorded from France (36,015.305 Mm3) and Germany (4875.027 Mm3). In contrast, Morocco maintained a net export position with five countries, namely the Netherlands (754.295 Mm3), Belgium (48.886 Mm3), Portugal (18.645 Mm3), Malta (0.154 Mm3), and Slovenia (0.095 Mm3).
Virtual water export analysis shows that Morocco exports more virtual water through fruits and vegetables to the European Union countries, particularly water-intensive agricultural products such as citrus fruits, avocados, grapes, watermelons, artichokes, and fresh tomatoes, while importing only a small volume of the virtual water embedded in these agricultural products. Furthermore, the economic return on water has shown that many agricultural products exported to the European Union are not generating significant profit relative to the volume of virtual water consumed in their production. In contrast, this study also revealed that Morocco imports a substantial amount of virtual water in the form of cereals, which allows the country to save a considerable volume of water that would otherwise be required to produce these staple food products domestically. This pattern illustrates a more efficient use of national water resources, in line with comparative advantage, by relying on imports for highly water-demanding crops that are essential to the Moroccan diet. However, despite being a net importer of virtual water and holding a comparative advantage in cereal trade, Morocco continues to export large volumes of fruits and vegetables that are highly water-intensive, which raises concerns in light of the country’s alarming water scarcity situation. The persistence of prolonged droughts and the worsening water stress indicate that maintaining such an export strategy is no longer sustainable under current and projected hydrological conditions.
Based on the above findings, this study, through the analysis of virtual water trade flows, underscores the importance of preserving Morocco’s water resources. It recommends that policymakers revise current agricultural policies by explicitly integrating virtual water trade as a strategic tool to alleviate pressure on already scarce water resources. This entails considering both the water footprint of agricultural commodities and the country’s water availability prior to launching new agricultural programs. Particular attention should be given to maintaining a balanced level of virtual water imports to mitigate the risk of water and food dependency on European Union countries, while avoiding the overexploitation of domestic water resources through the continued cultivation and export of water-intensive crops. In this context, agricultural planning should be grounded in the specific pedoclimatic and hydrological conditions of each region, thereby ensuring that crop selection aligns with regional suitability and resource availability. Additionally, greater support should be directed toward biotechnology and agronomic research to develop crop varieties that are more resilient to both biotic (e.g., pests, diseases) and abiotic (e.g., water scarcity, salinity) stresses.
These efforts should be complemented by broader structural measures, including improving water use efficiency in domestic agriculture, promoting the cultivation of less water-intensive crops, and investing in wastewater reuse and desalination technologies. Furthermore, diversifying cereal import sources beyond traditional partners such as France and Germany could reduce Morocco’s dependence on a limited set of suppliers, thereby enhancing national food security and resilience to external shocks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and A.R.; methodology, M.R. and H.O.; software, M.R.; validation, A.B. and M.O.; formal analysis, M.R. and A.R.; investigation, M.R. and H.O.; resources, M.R.; data curation, M.R. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R. and A.R.; writing—review and editing, M.R. and H.O.; visualization, M.O. and A.B.; supervision, A.B. and M.O.; project administration, M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are publicly available from the FAOSTAT database (https://www.fao.org/faostat accessed on 19 June 2025)) and from the UN Comtrade database (https://comtrade.un.org/ (accessed on 19 June 2025)). The processed datasets generated during the current study (Crop Water Requirements calculations) are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referees. All errors are our responsibility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Nnamdi, B.; Agunwamba, J.C. Modeling the Influence of Meteorological Variables on Runoff in a Tropical Watershed. Civ. Eng. J. 2020, 6, 2344–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. UN. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. World Economic Forum. Global Risks 2015; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_2015_Report15.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  4. OECD. Pricing of Water Services; OECD: Paris, France, 1987; pp. 18–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Report, C.; Network, A.C. The Dublin Statement on Water and Sustainable Development. Waterlines 1992, 10, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Direction Générale de l’Hydraulique au Maroc—Ministére de l’Equipement et de l’eau. L’Hydraulique En Chiffres; 2023. Available online: https://www.equipement.gov.ma/eau/documentation/Pages/accueil.aspx (accessed on 29 May 2025).
  7. Conseil Economique Social et Environnemental. La Gouvernance Par La Gestion Intégrée Des Ressources En Eau Au Maroc: Levier Fondamental de Développement Durable. 2014. Available online: https://www.cese.ma/media/2020/10/Rapport-Gouvernance-des-ressources-en-eau.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2025).
  8. Gumus, V.; El Moçayd, N.; Seker, M.; Seaid, M. Future Projection of Droughts in Morocco and Potential Impact on Agriculture. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 367, 122019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kawtar Fikri, B.; Ismaili, M.; Benbrahim, S.F.; Tribak, A. Land Degradation by Desertification and Deforestation in Morocco. Planetaires/Secheresse 2004, 15, 307–320. [Google Scholar]
  10. Anderson, W.; Seager, R.; Cottier, F.; de Sherbinin, A. Violent Conflict Exacerbated Drought-Related Food Insecurity between 2009 and 2019 in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Global Nexus. Morocco’s Water Security: Productivity, Efficiency, Integrity. Policy Brief PB-17/34, OCP Policy Center. 2017. Available online: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/OCPPC-PB1734.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2025).
  12. Miguel, L.; Silva-novoa, S.; Bossenbroek, L.; Schilling, J.; Berger, E. Governance and Sustainability Challenges in the Water Policy of Morocco 1995–2020: Insights from the Middle Draa Valley. Water 2022, 14, 2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ministère de l’Agriculture de la PecheMaritime du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forets. Le Plan Maroc Vert, Bilan et Impact 2008–2018; Ministère de L’agriculture de la Peche Maritime du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forets: Rabat, Morocco, 2018. Available online: https://www.agriculture.gov.ma/fr/publications/plan-maroc-vert-bilan-et-impacts (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  14. Ministére de L’économie et Finances; Département Études et Statistiques Office du Change. Commerce Extérieur Du Maroc 2023, Rapport Annuel; Ministére de L’économie et Finances: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. Union Européenne. Les Relations Union Européenne-Maroc. Commerce et Investissement. European External Action Service. 2021. Available online: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Commerce%20et%20investissement.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2025).
  16. Molle, F.; Tanouti, O. Squaring the Circle: Agricultural Intensification vs. Water Conservation in Morocco. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 192, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdelmajid, S.; Rachid, S.; Bouhid, L. Self-Sufficiency in Strategic Agricultural Products and Agricultural Policy in Morocco between 2008 and 2018. Rev. Française d’Economie Gest. 2023, 4, 427–443. [Google Scholar]
  18. Boudhar, A.; Boudhar, S.; Ibourk, A. An Input–Output Framework for Analysing Relationships between Economic Sectors and Water Use and Intersectoral Water Relationships in Morocco. J. Econ. Struct. 2017, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Allan, T. “Virtual Water”: A Long Term Solution for Water Short Middle Eastern Economies? School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. Merrett, S. Introduction to the Economics of Water Resources: An International Perspective, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lant, C. Commentary. Water Int. 2003, 28, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Duchin, F.; López-Morales, C. Do Water-Rich Regions Have a Comparative Advantage in Food Production? Improving the Representation of Water for Agriculture in Economic Models. Econ. Syst. Res. 2012, 24, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wichelns, D. The Policy Relevance of Virtual Water Can Be Enhanced by Considering Comparative Advantages. Agric. Water Manag. 2004, 66, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, W.; Opp, C.; Yang, D. Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Water and Water Footprint. Water 2020, 12, 3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Buytaert, W.; de Bievre, B. Water for Cities: The Impact of Climate Change and Demographic Growth in the Tropical Andes. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48, W08503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Serrano, A.; Guan, D.; Duarte, R.; Paavola, J. Virtual Water Flows in the EU27: A Consumption-Based Approach. J. Ind. Ecol. 2016, 20, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Antonelli, M.; Tamea, S.; Yang, H. Intra-EU Agricultural Trade, Virtual Water Flows and Policy Implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 587–588, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alexoaei, A.P.; Cojanu, V.; Coman, C.I. On Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Trade in Virtual Water for the Eu’s Food Security. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fu, T.; Xu, C.; Huang, X. Analysis of Virtual Water Trade Flow and Driving Factors in the European Union. Water 2021, 13, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vanham, D. An Assessment of the Virtual Water Balance for Agricultural Products in EU River Basins. Water Resour. Ind. 2013, 1–2, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.; Fan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Varbanov, P.; Klemeš, J. Virtual Water and CO2 Emission Footprints Embodied in Power Trade: EU-27. Energy Policy 2021, 155, 112348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roidt, M.; Chini, C.M.; Stillwell, A.S.; Cominola, A. Unlocking the Impacts of COVID-19 Lockdowns: Changes in Thermal Electricity Generation Water Footprint and Virtual Water Trade in Europe. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hoekstra, A.Y.; Chapagain, A.K. The Water Footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands: Global Water Use as a Result of Domestic Consumption of Agricultural Commodities. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schyns, J.F.; Hoekstra, A.Y. The Added Value of Water Footprint Assessment for National Water Policy: A Case Study for Morocco. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hirwa, H.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Qiao, Y.; Leng, P.; Tian, C.; Yang, G.; Muhirwa, F.; Diop, S.; Kayiranga, A.; et al. Virtual Water Transfers in Africa: Assessing Topical Condition of Water Scarcity, Water Savings, and Policy Implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Boudhar, A.; Boudhar, S.; Oudgou, M.; Ibourk, A. Assessment of Virtual Water Flows in Morocco’s Foreign Trade of Crop Products. Resources 2023, 12, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Haddad, E.A.; Mengoub, F.E.; Vale, V.A. Water Content in Trade: A Regional Analysis for Morocco. Econ. Syst. Res. 2020, 32, 565–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. European Court of Auditors. Climate Adaptation in the EU—Action Not Keeping up with Ambition. Eur. Court Audit. 2024, 15, 63. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rana, G.; Katerji, N. Measurement and Estimation of Actual Evapotranspiration in the Field under Mediterranean Climate: A Review. Eur. J. Agron. 2000, 13, 125–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoekstra, A.Y.; Hung, P. Virtual Water Trade: A Quantification of Virtual Water Flows between Nations in Relation to International Crop Trade. In Virtual Water Trade: A Quantification of Virtual Water Flows between Nations in Relation to International Crop Trade; UNESCO-IHE: Delft, The Netherlands, 2002; Available online: https://www.waterfootprint.org/resources/Report11.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2025).
  41. Montieth, J.L. Evaporation and Environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1965, 19, 205–234. [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith, M.; Allen, R.; Monteith, J.L.; Perrier, A.; Santos Pereira, L.; Segeren, A. Expert Consultation on Revision of FAO Methodologies for Crop Water Requirements; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pereira, L.S.; Perrier, A.; Allen, R.G.; Alves, I. Evapotranspiration: Concepts and Future Trends. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 1999, 125, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smith, M. CROPWAT: A Computer Program for Irrigation Planning and Management, FAO Irrigation and Drainage; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, M.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. CLIMWAT for CROPWAT: A Climatic Database for Irrigation Planning and Management; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  46. CLIMWAT|Land&Water|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations|Land&Water|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/climwat-for-cropwat/en/ (accessed on 19 June 2025).
  47. FAO Crop Calendar. Available online: https://cropcalendar.apps.fao.org/#/home?id=MA&crops=0325 (accessed on 19 June 2025).
  48. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper Crop Evapotranspiration, Crop Evapotranspiration (Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements) Paper 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  49. Doorenbos, J.; Pruitt, W.O. Crop Water Requirements Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24; Land and Water Development Division, FAO: Rome, Italy, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  50. UN Comtrade. Available online: https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow (accessed on 19 June 2025).
  51. FAOSTAT. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 19 June 2025).
  52. Caro, D.; Alessandrini, A.; Sporchia, F.; Borghesi, S. Global Virtual Water Trade of Avocado. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study area illustrates Morocco and the member countries of the European Union.
Figure 1. Map of the study area illustrates Morocco and the member countries of the European Union.
Water 17 02664 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart of the methodological procedures.
Figure 2. Flowchart of the methodological procedures.
Water 17 02664 g002
Figure 3. Variation in exported virtual water by Moroccan agricultural products per year.
Figure 3. Variation in exported virtual water by Moroccan agricultural products per year.
Water 17 02664 g003
Figure 4. Virtual water embodied in fruits, vegetables, pulses, and cereals exported to European Union countries over the timescale of this study: (a) top 4 fruit virtual water exporters; (b) top 4 vegetable virtual water exporters; (c) pulse virtual water exports; (d) cereal virtual water exports.
Figure 4. Virtual water embodied in fruits, vegetables, pulses, and cereals exported to European Union countries over the timescale of this study: (a) top 4 fruit virtual water exporters; (b) top 4 vegetable virtual water exporters; (c) pulse virtual water exports; (d) cereal virtual water exports.
Water 17 02664 g004
Figure 5. Global virtual water export from Morocco to the EU countries over the period of 2000–2020.
Figure 5. Global virtual water export from Morocco to the EU countries over the period of 2000–2020.
Water 17 02664 g005
Figure 6. Variation in imported virtual water by Morocco per year.
Figure 6. Variation in imported virtual water by Morocco per year.
Water 17 02664 g006
Figure 7. Virtual water embodied in fruits, vegetables, pulses and cereals imported to European Union countries over the timescale of this study: (a) cereal virtual water imports from the EU28; (b) top vegetable, fruit, and pulse virtual water imports from EU28.
Figure 7. Virtual water embodied in fruits, vegetables, pulses and cereals imported to European Union countries over the timescale of this study: (a) cereal virtual water imports from the EU28; (b) top vegetable, fruit, and pulse virtual water imports from EU28.
Water 17 02664 g007
Figure 8. Global virtual water import from the EU countries to Morocco over the period of 2000–2020.
Figure 8. Global virtual water import from the EU countries to Morocco over the period of 2000–2020.
Water 17 02664 g008
Figure 9. Virtual water export, virtual water import, andglobal net virtual water per year.
Figure 9. Virtual water export, virtual water import, andglobal net virtual water per year.
Water 17 02664 g009
Figure 10. Net virtual water of crop products from 2000 to 2020; (a): net virtual water of cereal products; (b): net virtual water of pulse products; (c): net virtual water of vegetable products; (d): net virtual water of fruit products.
Figure 10. Net virtual water of crop products from 2000 to 2020; (a): net virtual water of cereal products; (b): net virtual water of pulse products; (c): net virtual water of vegetable products; (d): net virtual water of fruit products.
Water 17 02664 g010
Figure 11. Net virtual water between Morocco and the EU countries during the period of 2000–2020.
Figure 11. Net virtual water between Morocco and the EU countries during the period of 2000–2020.
Water 17 02664 g011
Figure 12. Water economic productivity per agricultural product exported to EU28 countries.
Figure 12. Water economic productivity per agricultural product exported to EU28 countries.
Water 17 02664 g012
Table 1. The various data used in Cropwat 8.0 software.
Table 1. The various data used in Cropwat 8.0 software.
DataInputsSources
ClimateEvapotranspiration ET0
Rainfall data
CLIMWAT 2.0 [46]
Crop PlantingPlanting dateFAO Crop Calendar database [47]
CropKc per crop
Rooting depth
Development stage (Days)
Yield response (Ky)
Critical depletion
CROPWAT 8.0 [44]
FAO Irrigation and Drainage [48]
Doorenbos and Pruitt [49]
SoilSoil name and soil dataCROPWAT 8.0 [44]
Table 2. Exported virtual water by crop category from 2000 to 2020.
Table 2. Exported virtual water by crop category from 2000 to 2020.
CategoryVWE (Mm3)Percentage (%)
Total Fruits2903.02885.539
Total Vegetables467.94813.788
Total Pulses19.6470.578
Total Cereals3.1660.095
Total3393.791100
Table 3. Top 3 EU28 countries importing Moroccan virtual water.
Table 3. Top 3 EU28 countries importing Moroccan virtual water.
CountriesCategoriesVWE (Mm3)
FranceCereals1.807
Pulses8.062
Vegetables354.631
Fruits774.284
Total1138.785
NetherlandsCereals0
Pulses1.493
Vegetables28.200
Fruits844.629
Total874.323
UKCereals0
Pulses0.310
Vegetables18.952
Fruits411.610
Total430.872
Table 4. Imported virtual water by crop category from 2000 to 2020.
Table 4. Imported virtual water by crop category from 2000 to 2020.
CategoryVWI (Mm3)Percentage (%)
Total Cereals55,065.9899.697
Total Vegetables83.2070.15
Total Fruits79.3930.143
Total Pulses4.3860.007
Total55,232.96100
Table 5. Top 3 EU28 countries exporting virtual water to Morocco.
Table 5. Top 3 EU28 countries exporting virtual water to Morocco.
CountriesCategoriesVWI (Mm3)
FranceCereals37,138.78
Pulses0.457
Vegetables6.789
Fruits8.066
Total37,154.09
GermanyCereals4979.936
Pulses0.006
Vegetables0.35
Fruits0.004
Total4980.296
PolandCereals2328.502
Pulses0.3117
Vegetables0.0002
Fruits1.225
Total2330.039
Table 6. Net Virtual water by EU28 countries from 2000 to 2020.
Table 6. Net Virtual water by EU28 countries from 2000 to 2020.
CountriesVWI (Mm3)VWE (Mm3)NVW (Mm3)
Germany4980.296105.269−4875.027
Austria1.230.129−1.101
Belgium70.123119.00948.886
Bulgaria2055.7830.000−2055.783
Cyprus1.4230.111−1.311
Croatia121.2420.015−121.227
Denmark338.8460.039−338.807
Spain627.604281.606−345.998
Estonia629.8820.462−629.420
Finland423.93042.993−380.937
France37,154.0901138.785−36,015.305
Greece77.7610.238−77.523
Hungary453.0530.523−452.530
Ireland12.5589.339−3.219
Italy138.68647.071−91.615
Latvia550.3432.969−547.374
Lithuania1569.317117.945−1451.372
Luxembourg0.0190.000−0.019
Malta0.0000.1540.154
Netherlands120.030874.325754.295
Poland2330.03918.970−2311.069
Portugal0.95919.60418.645
Romania2113.0870.021−2113.066
UK738.174430.872−307.302
Slovakia17.8052.342−15.463
Slovenia0.0000.0950.095
Sweden209.783180.233−29.550
Czech Republic496.9000.672−496.228
Total55,232.9633393.791−51,839.171
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ridaoui, M.; Razzouki, A.; Ouhbi, H.; Oudgou, M.; Boudhar, A. Exploring the Dynamics of Virtual Water Trade in Crop Products Between Morocco and the European Union. Water 2025, 17, 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17182664

AMA Style

Ridaoui M, Razzouki A, Ouhbi H, Oudgou M, Boudhar A. Exploring the Dynamics of Virtual Water Trade in Crop Products Between Morocco and the European Union. Water. 2025; 17(18):2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17182664

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ridaoui, Mounsif, Aziz Razzouki, Hafsa Ouhbi, Mohamed Oudgou, and Abdeslam Boudhar. 2025. "Exploring the Dynamics of Virtual Water Trade in Crop Products Between Morocco and the European Union" Water 17, no. 18: 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17182664

APA Style

Ridaoui, M., Razzouki, A., Ouhbi, H., Oudgou, M., & Boudhar, A. (2025). Exploring the Dynamics of Virtual Water Trade in Crop Products Between Morocco and the European Union. Water, 17(18), 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17182664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop