Next Article in Journal
Effect of Moisture Sources on the Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Particulate Matter on Biofilm Stability in a Water Supply Network
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Removal of Carbamazepine in Aqueous Solution by TiO2 Ceramic Photo-Catalyst under Simulated Solar Light: Kinetics, Effects of Environmental Factors and Degradation Pathways

Department of Water–Environment–Oceanography (WEO), University of Science and Technology of Hanoi (USTH), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi 122100, Vietnam
Environmental Management Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8569, Japan
UMR LEGOS, University of Toulouse, IRD, CNES, CNRS, UPS, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(8), 1583;
Received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023


Current research on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 mainly focuses on its nano- or micro-particle forms, which are difficult to recycle and apply in real engineering applications. This study aims to apply a small pilot of TiO2 in the ceramic form to remove carbamazepine (CBZ) from an aqueous solution under simulated sunlight. A high removal efficiency up to >99% was shown in a 5 mg L−1 CBZ solution after 6 h of irradiation with a total energy of 150.92 kJ. The kinetic degradation was not affected in an alkaline solution (at pH 7, pH 10, and pH 13) but was faster under acidic conditions (pH 2) in which CBZ existed in the protonated form. The presence of NO3 (10–50 mg L−1) slightly affected the photodegradation of CBZ while humic acid significantly reduced the photocatalytic activity. In addition, the presence of major ions in water also had a negative effect at concentrations between 10 and 50 mg L−1. The MS/MS was used to identify the transformation products of CBZ, and a possible degradation mechanism was proposed. The toxicity of CBZ and the by-products was primarily evaluated. The results showed that TiO2 ceramics show high reusability and stability with a photocatalytic performance of >95% and a mass loss of <5% after 90 degradation cycles.

1. Introduction

Over the last two decades, pharmaceutical residues, as new emerging pollutants, have received increasing attention due to their high persistence in wastewater treatment and their ubiquitous detection frequency in various water systems [1,2,3]. One of the famous pharmaceuticals widely used in treating psychomotor attacks is carbamazepine (C15H12N2O, hereafter noted as CBZ) with a consumption of up to 1014 tons per year [4]. CBZ was one of the most pharmaceutical residues found in an aquatic environment. Its concentration was reported to be up to 21.6 µg L−1 in the influents of a wastewater treatment plant [5] and less than 1 µg L−1 in natural surface water [6]. In the environment, CBZ can affect embryonic cells, preventing their development and causing defects. In some cases, low doses of CBZ have a strong toxic effect on the central nervous system and the digestive system. Long-term use of CBZ can lead to changes in blood cells and lipids, a decrease in white blood cell levels, and even severe symptoms [7,8,9]. In addition, carbamazepine is also an aromatic nitrogen heterocyclic component with a symmetrical structure, which cannot be efficiently eliminated by biochemical treatment processes. Recently, different types of materials have been developed to remove CBZ, such as BiOCl/Fe3O4 [10], g-C3N4/TiO2 composites [11], Fe3O4/BiOBr/BC [12], or self-assembled EHPDI/TiO2 [13]. However, these materials are not easy to synthesize and are difficult to implement in real applications because they are usually present as fine particles that require a great amount of energy to recover the catalyst after use. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is the most popular material used in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) due to its high ability to degrade chemical pollutants and pathogens, including bacteria and fungi. In addition, the band gap of TiO2 is between ~3.0 eV (rutile) and ~3.2 eV (anatase), within which it can be activated by sunlight. The combination of sunlight and photocatalysis can significantly reduce processing costs and is environmentally friendly. In this field, most of the recent studies have been conducted to investigate the photocatalytic behavior of TiO2 in various forms of nanoparticles [14], slurry power [15], or composites [16]. Recently, TiO2-based coatings [17] and hybrid nanomaterials [4,18] have shown promise as high performance photocatalysts for removing emerging contaminants in an aqueous solution. Micro- and nanostructured TiO2-based or hybrid materials were shown to have a high removal efficiency for CBZ in a shorter time, but an additional filtration separation step was added to the conventional steps (washing, filtering, and drying) [19,20,21]. Therefore, these new materials were still used only at the laboratory scale. Furthermore, a decrease in photocatalytic activity was observed in previous works for only five cycles [11,18,19]. This proves their instability and shows the need to improve them before large scale application. In addition, although these materials showed a high CBZ removal efficiency of up to 100%, mineralization was only 60–70%. Therefore, by-product identification is necessary to study the degradation mechanism as well as to evaluate the toxicity of the by-products using a Vibrio fischeri test or evaluating them mainly with available toxicity software.
In this context, the present study investigated the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 in the form of high-durability ceramics underwater. The main advantages of this TiO2 ceramic are that it is efficient, cheap, and easy to use and maintain. This ceramic was successfully synthesized and characterized by Kato et al., 2020 [22] and used for CBZ degradation under sunlight with various conditions regarding pH, water matrices, humic acid, and major ions in water. The photodegradation efficiency of CBZ was determined by an HPLC-DAD system, while the by-products were identified using an MS/MS system. The degradation mechanisms are also proposed. Finally, the software ProTox-II was used to evaluate the toxicity of the by-products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Reagents

Titanium dioxide (TiO2), the photocatalytic material, was used in the form of ceramic (Solid flake PSF-001), obtained from photocatalytic materials incorporated by Sowaku, Nagoya, Japan. The synthesis and characterization of this material were described by Kato et al., 2020 [22]. At first, the precursor monolith was prepared by mixing a titanium colloidal sol (PT-01, 15–20% of Ti solid) with activated carbon (ratio: 200/1 w/w). The mixing gel was then poured into a mold and dried to obtain the monolith titania gel, which was then calcined at 525 °C to a final TiO2 ceramic with length from 2 to 8 mm and thickness of 1 mm. The composition of TiO2 included anatase, brookite, and rutile, which was confirmed by XRD and Raman spectra. The specific surface area was approximately 100 m2/g, which was higher than that of P25 (standard photocatalyst powder). Carbamazepine (C15H12N2O, purity 99.78%), humic acid (HA), KNO3, NaHCO3, NH4Cl, CaCl2, NaOH, and concentrated HCl (37%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Singapore. Solvents (methanol and acetonitrile) of analytical HPLC grade were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Singapore). The ultrapure water was produced from Smart2pure 12 UV (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2. Solution Preparation

The CBZ solution (5 mg L−1) was prepared daily by dissolving 5 mg CBZ in one liter of variable water (ultrapure, tap, mineral, sea, and river water). HA, cations, and anions were added to the solution in the 5–50 mg L−1, except for Ca2+ and Mg2+, which were chosen as hard water concentrations according to Vietnam Standards (60–180 mg L−1). In addition, the pH was adjusted by adding HCl 0.1 M or NaOH 0.1 M using a pH meter (Sension + pH3 Basic laboratory pH and ORP Meter from Hach, Loveland, CO, USA).
Surface water samples used in this experiment were collected from the Red River and an urban lake in Hanoi city. After sampling, the water samples were filtered through a GF/F membrane (glass microfiber filter, 0.7 µm). The TOC values were measured as 2.099 mg L−1 and 3.462 mg L−1. Mineral composition of Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ was 57.186 mg L−1, 12.518 mg L−1, and 16.403 mg L−1, respectively, in the river sample, and 16.386 mg L−1, 4.98 mg L−1, and 11.381 mg L−1, respectively, in the lake sample.
Sea water was collected from the Gulf of Tonkin with the major compositions of Na+: 5386 mg L−1, Mg2+: 99.3 mg L−1, Ca2+: 60.2 mg L−1, and Fe2+: 0.8 mg L−1, which were determined by ICP-MS (iCap, Thermo Scientific). This water was also filtered through a GF/F membrane to remove suspended particles. The salinity of this sample was 13.7 and the conductivity was 22.2 mS cm−1. Its TOC value was 0.881 mg L−1.
Tap water was directly collected at the laboratory with the following dominant mineral composition: Na+: 2.395 mg L−1, Mg2+: 3.9 mg L−1, and, Ca2+: 17.015 mg L−1. The TOC value of the tap water used was 0.399 mg L−1.

2.3. Experimental Setup

A 40 g photocatalyst (TiO2) was packed in 4 × 20 cm Pyrex glass tubes (inner diameter: 1 cm). The reaction tubes were installed in the simulated sunlight reactor (model SUNTEST CPS+, Atlas Material Testing Technology LLC, Mt Prospect, IL, USA) equipped with a 400 W/m2 irradiated xenon lamp in the 300–800 nm range (Figure 1). The total energy dosage that was recorded by the SUNTEST CPS+ system was 21.56 kJ for 6 h of irradiation. The simulated light system was also installed with a daylight filter to limit the radiation under 290 nm (UV special glass, code: 56052371 UV). One liter of 5 mg L−1 CBZ (variable conditions) with various environmental factors such as pH, humic acid (HA), anions, and cations was circulated through the degradation system at a rate of 50 mL min−1 for 6 h. The CBZ solution was circulated through a photocatalyst (TiO2) for 30 min in the dark to reach an adsorption/desorption equilibrium. Then, the solution was irradiated, and samples were taken out every 30 min to analyze the removal efficiency of CBZ. All experiments were conducted at room temperature and the reactor was set at 25 °C.

2.4. Analysis

2.4.1. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

The concentration of CBZ was measured by an HPLC-DAD (Vanquish Core, Thermo Scientific). The separation of CBZ and its by-products (BDS, C18, 100 × 2.1 m products) was performed on a reserved phase C18 column where the column chamber was constantly set at 40 °C. The detection wavelength was 240 nm and the injection volume was 20 µL. The mobile phase consisted of ultrapure water (phase A) and MeOH (phase B). The gradient started at 90% of phase A and decreased linearly to 10% at 8 min. This composition was maintained for 3 min before returning to the initial condition (Table 1). This state was maintained isocratically until 15 min to make the column pressure constant and await the next injection. The flow rate was kept constant at 0.4 mL min−1. The retention time of carbamazepine was 7.7 ± 0.1 min.

2.4.2. Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC)

In this research, Shimadzu TOC-V CSN (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was used to determine the mineralization during the experiment. The combustion tube with platinum catalyst was set at 680 °C and an oxygen flow (5.0 grade) was used as the flue gas. The calibration curve was prepared daily from potassium hydrogen phthalate (C8H5KO4) in the 0.4 to 6.67 mg L−1 carbon range. The sensitivity of the instrument was checked daily using the solution (2 mg L−1). All samples were acidified with 50 µL of concentrated HCl (37%) and the acidified samples were then purged with ultrapure oxygen for 90 s to remove inorganic carbon before injection. Each measurement was injected with a 100 µL sample, which was repeated 3 times, and each injection lasted 5 min.

2.4.3. Identification of By-Products

By-products were identified by direct injection into an MS/MS system (XevoTQD, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with the full scan mode (m/z: 50 to 450). The samples were directly injected into the system with a flow rate of 100 µL min−1. The ionization was performed with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source in positive mode. The source parameters were set as follows: desolvation gas, 1000 L h−1; cone gas, 10 L h−1; desolvation gas temperature, 500 °C; source temperature, 150 °C; capillary voltage, 3000 V. The complete spectrum mass (m/z) was compared to previous works to identify the by-products and propose the degradation mechanism.

2.5. Toxicity of By-Products

In this experiment, ProTox-II software was used to predict the toxicity of CBZ, and all by-products were created after the degradation process [3,23]. The ProTox-II combined different parameters, such as molecular similarity and pharmacophore, and used machine learning to predict the various toxicities (hepatotoxicity, cytotoxicity, carcinogenicity, immunotoxicity, etc.). ProTox-II was freely accessed at (last updated on 1 February 2021).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Photocatalytic Test and Kinetic Degradation

3.1.1. Effect of pH

The surface charge of the photocatalyst and the speciation of CBZ depend on the pH value. CBZ has two pKa values (2.3 and 13.9) [24]. Therefore, CBZ is favored to exist in the neutral form in pH ranging from 3 to 11, while at pH 13, the main form of CBZ is anionic. These experiments were performed in ultrapure water (pH 7) and the pH was adjusted by adding a small amount of HCl 0.1 M or NaOH 0.1 M monitored by a pH meter. The degradation efficiency of CBZ by simulated sunlight/TiO2 photocatalyst under different pH values is shown in Figure 2. The degradation reaction rates at different conditions were shown in Table S1. The reaction rate constants were determined by plotting semi-log graphs of the initial concentration/interval concentration at time t versus the interval time. In all cases, the correlation coefficient values (R2) were higher than 0.95, which indicated that all reaction rates followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. CBZ degradation and the reaction rate constant were highest at pH 2 and CBZ was completely removed after 180 min. As the pH increases, the percentage removal significantly decreased. The degradation efficiencies at pH 7 and 10 were 84.9% and 83.6%, respectively, after 180 min of irradiation and the value of k (the reaction rate constant) decreased from 0.0253 min−1 at pH 2 to 0.0101 min−1 at pH 10. These results were similar to those reported by Chen et al., [25] for the photodegradation of CBZ by photocatalyst BiOCl/Fe3O4. It was proposed that the contribution of photo-generated h+ (Equation (1)) to CBZ degradation was about 95.0%, while the effect of HO radicals on the process was only 3.2% [25] because h+ could be more oxidizing than HO (the oxidation potential of TiO2 is about 2.9 eV higher than that of HO, which is 2.38 eV). Thus, when the pH increased to 10, the concentration of OH also increased, which led to the decrease in the concentration of h+ according to the reaction (Equation (2)), so the efficiency of CBZ degradation decreases when the amount of h+ decreases (at higher pH).
At 3 < pH < 10, CBZ is in the neutral form [8]. The surface of the photocatalyst (TiO2) becomes positively charged in a solution with lower pH because the pZc of the TiO2 photocatalyst is about 5–6 [26]. This increased the interaction between the electron-rich aromatic nucleus of CBZ and the photocatalyst, and the degradation efficiency was most effective in lower pH solutions [27]. This was even more obvious when the pH increased from 10 to 13, which changed the state of CBZ from its natural to anionic form, thus increasing the decomposition capacity. However, with a sudden increase in pH, the concentration of h+ decreased relatively, resulting in the degradation capacity obtained after 6 h of experimentation only reaching nearly 60% compared to 100% at pH 2 or pH 7. In addition, the value of k at pH 13 is only 0.0023, which is five times lower than at pH 10 or pH 7.
TiO2 → TiO2 (e + h+)
TiO2 (h+) + OH → TiO2 + HO
Figure 2. Degradation of CBZ in solutions of different pH: (a) Removal efficiency; (b) kinetic degradation.
Figure 2. Degradation of CBZ in solutions of different pH: (a) Removal efficiency; (b) kinetic degradation.
Water 15 01583 g002

3.1.2. Effect of Anions and Humic Acid (HA)

The effects of major anions, such as chloride (Cl), nitrate (NO3), bicarbonate (HCO3), carbonate (CO32−), and humic acid (HA), existing in the environment were studied. The decomposition rate increased slightly in the presence of 50 mg L−1 NO3, while it significantly decreased with the presence of individual anions, including HCO3, Cl, CO32−, and humic acid (HA), at 50 mg L−1 (Figure 3). A depletion in the concentration of photo-generated h+ via its combination with other anions, including Cl, HCO3, HA, and CO32− (Equations (3)–(6)), prevents h+ from degrading CBZ directly [25]. Thus, with the addition of HA, Cl, and HCO3 at low concentrations of 10 mg L−1 and 20 mg L−1, the degradation efficiency in UPW decreased slightly from 100% to 92.7%, 88.5%, and 95.8%, respectively, at 10 mg L−1 and from 100% to 97.1%, 94.0%, and 92.1%, respectively, at 20 mg L−1. With an increase in the concentration of HA, Cl, or HCO3 to 50 mg L−1, these values were only 81.05%, 91.17%, and 84.06%, respectively. This shows the negative effect of humic acid and these two inorganic anions on the decomposition process of CBZ.
Although the concentration of selected CO32− was different from that of the previous anions, the main tendency was still to hinder the decomposition process of CBZ because h+ is acted by external anions, resulting in a low decomposition efficiency. However, as the concentration of the selected anion was also several times higher, the efficiency of the decomposition process was also significantly reduced, reaching only 71.5%, 70.1%, and 56.7% for CO32− concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mg L−1, respectively. In contrast, the addition of NO3 slightly enhanced the CBZ photodegradation, which could be explained by the formation of two NO2 and HO radicals under simulated solar irradiation (Equation (7)) [6]. The efficiency of photodegradation with the addition of NO3 ions (from small to large amount) was slightly higher than under UPW conditions throughout the experiment. For example, after 180 min, the photodegradation efficiency with NO3 additions of 10, 20, and 50 mg L−1 was 81.8%, 86.1%, and 85.5%, respectively, which is slightly higher than that of the samples without NO3 (80.9%). In addition, the degradation efficiency also reached 100% after 6 h, showing that CBZ was also completely decomposed. These results confirm the enhancing effect of NO3 photodegradation.
The presence of humic acid was perhaps the most questionable because many previous studies have shown that the addition of HA to the original solution could accelerate the decomposition process since HA could produce other reactive species such as singlet oxygen (O2), superoxide anions (O2●−), and solvated electrons that enhanced the efficiency of degradation [21,28,29]. For example, the photodegradation efficiency of 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) was four times faster than in ultrapure water in the presence of 5 mg L−1 HA [30]. However, it was observed that the photodegradation of CBZ decreased in the presence of HA. The degradation efficiency of CBZ in the presence of 50 mg L−1 HA was only 55.6% and 81.1% after 180 min and 360 min of irradiation, respectively. The rate constant decreased from 0.0109 to 0.0044 min−1. These results are similar to previous studies [10,12]. Similar to the effects of the anion when present in the original carbamazepine solution, HA also captured the photo-generated h+ to form the (HA●+) radical [11], leading to the decrease in h+ in the solution, and the degradation efficiency also dropped significantly. Moreover, humic substances could generate reactive species such as solvated electrons, hydroxyl radicals, singlet oxygen, and reactive triplet states with photochemical excitation. That was the main reason for gradually reducing the decomposition of carbamazepine [12].
HCO3 + h+ → HCO3
CO32− + h+ → CO3●−
Cl + h+ → Cl
HA + h+ → HA+●
NO3 + H2O → NO2 + OH + HO
Figure 3. Degradation of CBZ with the addition of anions and HA: (a) Removal efficiency; (b) kinetic degradation.
Figure 3. Degradation of CBZ with the addition of anions and HA: (a) Removal efficiency; (b) kinetic degradation.
Water 15 01583 g003

3.1.3. Effect of Cations Ca2+, Mg2+, and Water Matrices

The effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+, which are major cations in surface water, was also investigated. With the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the solution, precipitation was observed during the experiment (Figure 4). With higher cation concentrations, more precipitate was observed on the surface of the catalyst and the reaction tube wall (Equation (8)).
With the accumulation of white precipitates on the photocatalyst surface, it was expected that the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 would be reduced with time. However, the results showed the opposite trend (Figure 4). After 9 cycles and gradually increasing the concentration of both cations (from 60 mg L−1 to 180 mg L−1), the degradation efficiency of CBZ after 6 h of testing did not change significantly compared to the experiment without the two cations (from 100% to 96%). This was also reported by Negishi and colleagues who concluded that, despite the accumulation of precipitation on the catalyst, the photocatalytic activity only slightly decreased [31].
Figure 4 also shows the photodegradation efficiency of CBZ in different water matrices: lake, river, sea, tap, and ultrapure water. Similarly to the previous results, TiO2 can remove CBZ in these matrices under solar irradiation. In general, CBZ is degraded most effectively in UPW, while TiO2 has the worst catalytic performance in lake or river water. This could be explained by the fact that although decomposition can still occur efficiently, complete degradation can be suppressed in the presence of some dissolved organic matter such as HA in lake or river water [32].
The CBZ decomposition process that occurred in the seawater and tap water matrix was also studied to evaluate the impact of these two types of water environments on the ability of TiO2 materials to remove CBZ. The lower degradation efficiencies in seawater and tap water matrices illustrated the detrimental effect of natural waters with the presence of higher concentrations of inorganic salts, dissolved organic matter, etc. HO radicals or photo-generated h+ (strong oxidizing agents) are thus transferred to weaker oxidizing agents such as Cl●− and CO3●− [33], leading to a decrease in the degradation efficiency of CBZ (Equations (9)–(11)).
The degradation rate of CBZ in seawater was higher than in fresh surface water, even though the concentration of Mg2+ and Ca2+ is higher in seawater than in surface water. This phenomenon could be explained by the fact that the presence of Cl at high concentrations can prevent the adsorption of reaction inhibitors (HCO3 and CO32−) on TiO2. The results showed that the decomposition ability of CBZ reached high to low values in ultrapure water, tap water, seawater, river water, and lake water. The degradation efficiency of CBZ after 6 h in ultrapure water reached 100%, whereas this value in other waters tended to drop by 10–20% (Figure 4). These experiments showed that HA led to a significant decrease in CBZ degradation because it not only reduced strong oxidizing agents, such as other anions (Cl and HCO3), but also competed directly with CBZ degradation.
The TOC value of water samples was determined before CBZ decomposition. In river and lake waters, the TOC was 8–10 times higher than in seawater samples, showing that the HA concentration in the river or lake samples were higher, resulting in a decrease in CBZ degradation (from 96.2% to 86.5% and 80.8% in the river and lake samples, respectively) [34]. Additionally, the TOC value was more than twice as high when comparing seawater samples to tap water samples, and the concentration of cations that interfered with the decomposition process in seawater samples was five times higher than that of tap water, so that, after 180 min, the decomposition capacity of CBZ in seawater was only 70.9%, which is less than in tap water.
Ca2+ + CO32− → CaCO3
HCO3 + HO → H2O + CO3−●
CO32− + HO → HO + CO3−●
Cl + HO → HO + Cl●−
Figure 4. Degradation of CBZ in different waters: (a) Removal efficiency; (b) kinetic degradation. (DI = ultrapure water.)
Figure 4. Degradation of CBZ in different waters: (a) Removal efficiency; (b) kinetic degradation. (DI = ultrapure water.)
Water 15 01583 g004

3.2. Mineralization Studies

Ideally, the final by-products of degradation would be CO2 and H2O, and the TOC value would be close to zero. Therefore, TOC is one of the important parameters to monitor in the decomposition of organic compounds. The TOC remaining in the solution after degradation was measured (Figure 5). The mineralization efficiency was 31.7–71.3% after 6 h of irradiation under different conditions. Oxidative photodegradation involves two strong photogenerated oxidizing agents, h+ and HO radicals, to evolve into carbon dioxide (CO2) (Equation (12)) [35]. Although the reason is uncertain, it is possible that the presence of acetic acid during decomposition caused mineralization due to a process similar to its formation from malic acid [36] (Equations (13) and (14)).
Indeed, Figure 5 shows that the removal efficiencies had a similar trend to the percentage of photodegradation. In pH 2, this value was the highest (71.3%) while the lowest TOC value belonged to the lake condition (31.7%). As mentioned before, the high amount of DOM in lake or river water significantly decreased the CBZ decomposition, as well as TOC, compared to other types of water. In contrast, at pH 2, photogenerated h+, free to operate without being prevented by any free radical, was also the main reason leading to the highest mineralization value [25]. Moreover, with the presence of agents such as inorganic anions and HA, the TOC value had a significant downward trend. On the other hand, with the addition of the inorganic anion, NO3, the TOC value tended to increase. When a concentration of NO3 (50 mg L−1) was added, the TOC value increased slightly from 55.79% to 66.2%. It was explained that, in addition to the free-running photogenerated h+, NO3 also generated more HO radicals, which were one of the beneficial factors for the decomposition process [12].
CH3COOH + h+ → CO2
Figure 5. Mineralization efficiency of 5 mg L−1 carbamazepine under different conditions.
Figure 5. Mineralization efficiency of 5 mg L−1 carbamazepine under different conditions.
Water 15 01583 g005

3.3. Mechanism and Proposed Pathways

At the beginning of the experiment, only the peak of BBZ was observed before the light was turned on (Figure 6). Then, the peak area of CBZ decreased dramatically and new lower peaks appeared, confirming an efficient degradation of CBZ and the formation of by-products. The retention time of CBZ was determined at 7.737 min, while the retention time of the by-products was detected at 1.157, 1.694, 6.568, 7.037, and 10.55 min. This was illustrated in the mechanism (Figure 6) and detected by MS (mass spectrometry).
The mechanism of the by-product formation is shown in Figure 7 and is hereafter discussed in comparison to the literature. During the photodegradation process of CBZ, there are two main pathways. First, (Phenytoin) is formed by the hydration of CBZ (m/z = 253 = 237 + 16) [9]. The by-product at m/z = 251 could be the predominant secondary degradation by-product generated from 10, 11-epoxycarbamazepine due to the intramolecular reaction [12]. In addition, the by-product at m/z = 251 was oxidized to form a by-product at m/z = 210. After that, the epoxy bond of 10, 11-epoxy carbamazepine was attacked by two h+ or O2●− radicals, which led to the appearance of 10-1(1aminovinyl)-10,10a-dihydroacridine-9-carbaldehyde, but there was also intramolecular transformation, so the molecular weight could not change [25]. Then, the by-product at m/z = 208 was produced as the ring contraction combined with the reduction (-CONH2) of (1,1(1-aminovinyl)-10, 10a-dihydroacridine-9-carbaldehyde) and was oxidized again to form acridine (180) and acridone (196) [12]. Another means of by-product production is the formation of 10-hydroxy carbamazepine by the attack of HO to the olefin bond in the carbamazepine ring, which could be constructed into 10,11-dihydro-10,11-dihydroxycarbamazepine when this bond interacts with HO groups again. Finally, the above by-products undergo another ring-opening reaction and the product detected is acetic acid (m/z = 60), which can be mineralized to CO2 and H2O via oxidation. Combined with the TOC removal efficiency (71.27%), this demonstrates that most of the by-products can be removed into small inorganic molecules by the TiO2 photocatalyst. Some other by-products, such as acridont-hydroxide (m/z = 226), 3-hydroxybenzoic acid (m/z = 137), and by-products at m/z = 115, were found [12,37], but in this study, signals with these masses were not detected.
As shown in Figure 8, the peak intensity of CBZ and other by-products was obtained at different masses. Specifically, in the initial condition (t = −30 min), the peak at m/z = 237 was the dominant peak with the highest signal. After 60 or 180 min of degradation, some by-products appeared as revealed by new mass peaks at m/z equal to 60, 180, 196, and 270. The name, formula, and structure of the by-products are shown in Table 2.

3.4. Reusability of Photocatalyst

The resulting composites were designed mainly to allow their easy separation after the process [5]. After about 90 cycles, the degradation efficiency in the subsequent process experienced a slight decrease under the same condition as the initial one (ultrapure water, pH = 7). This value decreased from 100% after 360 min to 91.26% with a decrease in the mass of the TiO2 photocatalyst of about 5% (from 41 g to 39 g). It is clear that TiO2 in the ceramic form is extraordinarily stable and that the catalyst was occasionally chipped and flushed from the system. The photocatalytic activity can be regenerated by washing with HCl 1 M. The washing step was performed by cycling with HCl 1 M for 30 min to eliminate the impurity sticking on the surface of the material, and then rinsing again with 1 L of ultrapure water [31]. Even though this led to a small decrease, the photocatalyst was purified and its activity also stabilized (Figure 9). In addition, the morphology of the surface of PFS-01 before and after the experiment was observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and there was no change in the morphology of the surface (Figure S1). The XRD results (Figure S2) showed a mixture of anatase, brookite, and rutile forms in the material and the XRD spectrums are similar for the material before and after the experiment.

3.5. Prediction of By-Product Toxicity

Based on the analyzed results of Protox II, most of the by-products were found to be as toxic as or less toxic than carbamazepine, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed method in removing carbamazepine antibiotics from water. Only one by-product, acridine 9-carboxylic acid, was more toxic than CBZ (Table 3). These results are consistent with other studies that showed that the by-products of carbamazepine were Acridine; Acridone, which was found have an equal toxicity to carbamazepine; and/or Acridine-9-carboxylic acid, which was found to have a higher toxicity than CBZ [38,39,40]. Some by-products such as Acridone and Acridi are not only harmful to people but are also toxic to the organisms living in the water. Furthermore, the annual amount of carbamazepine released into the environment is extremely large, indicating that it is necessary to develop a method to remove it from the domestic environment.

4. Conclusions

This study shows that TiO2 in a ceramic form (PSF-01 solid flake) is effective in removing CBZ under sunlight. The photocatalytic degradation of CBZ is enhanced under acidic conditions with 100% decomposition after only 120 min of irradiation. The presence of NO3 ion enhances the decomposition rate of CBZ, while the presence of other ions, including Ca2+, Mg2+, and NH4+, humic acid, and different water matrices decreases the degradation rate. In addition, the TiO2 ceramic material exhibited good reusability and stability over a long period of use. Six main by-products were successfully identified by mass spectroscopy and their toxicities were identified by ProTox-II. Most by-products had similar toxicities to the parent compound but were generated at lower concentrations. Therefore, toxicity assessments should also be evaluated by practical tests to obtain accurate results instead of being predicted by the ProTox-II software. In the next step, the degradation of mixed compounds that usually exist in the real scenario will be studied before being applied in a larger pilot.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at:, Figure S1: SEM image of PFS-01 before and after experiments; Figure S2: XRD analysis of PFS-01 before and after experiments; Figure S3. UV Vis spectrum of PFS-01 material; Table S1. Reaction rate constant followed pseudo-first-order kinetics.

Author Contributions

T.H.N.: Conceptualization, experiment, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, and methodology. V.T.K.: Methodology and formal analysis. C.T.V., N.T.K.O., N.T.V.A. and L.H.L.: Funding acquisition, writing: review and editing, and visualization. N.N. and S.O.: Resources, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing. B.V.H.: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was funded by the University of Science and Technology of Hanoi (USTH), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST) for Emerging Research Group (Decision number: 1077/QĐ-ĐHKHCN).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.


This research was supported in part by the Kurita Asia Research Grant (Grant number: 22Pvn009-R3) provided by Kurita Water and Environment Foundation. This paper is also a contribution to the LOTUS International Joint Laboratory (, accessed on 16 April 2023) and the French National Research Institute for Sustainability Development (IRD). The authors also thank Nguyen Luong Lam and the AMSN department for the XRD measurement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Abbas, K.K.; Shabeeb, K.M.; Aljanabi, A.A.A.; Al-Ghaban, A.M.H.A. Photocatalytic degradation of Cefazolin over spherical nanoparticles of TiO2/ZSM-5 mesoporous nanoheterojunction under simulated solar light. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akter, S.; Islam, M.S.; Kabir, M.H.; Shaikh, M.A.A.; Gafur, M.A. UV/TiO2 photodegradation of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole in aqueous solution: An optimization and kinetic study. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fuart Gatnik, M.; Worth, A.P. Review of software tools for toxicity prediction. JRC Sci. Technol. Rep. 2010, 1–22. Available online: (accessed on 30 March 2023).
  4. Cao, J.; Nie, W.; Huang, L.; Ding, Y.; Lv, K.; Tang, H. Photocatalytic activation of sulfite by nitrogen vacancy modified graphitic carbon nitride for efficient degradation of carbamazepine. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 241, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sim, W.J.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, E.S.; Shin, S.K.; Hwang, S.R.; Oh, J.E. Occurrence and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater from households, livestock farms, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufactures. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kasprzyk-Hordern, B.; Dinsdale, R.M.; Guwy, A.J. The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. Water Res. 2009, 43, 363–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Albani, F.; Riva, R.; Baruzzi, A. Carbamazepine clinical pharmacology: A review. Pharmacopsychiatry 1995, 28, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bizi, M. Activated Carbon and the Principal Mineral Constituents of a Natural Soil in the Presence of Carbamazepine. Water 2019, 11, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clara, M.; Strenn, B.; Gans, O.; Martinez, E.; Kreuzinger, N.; Kroiss, H. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4797–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haroune, L.; Salaun, M.; Ménard, A.; Legault, C.Y.; Bellenger, J.P. Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine and three derivatives using TiO2 and ZnO: Effect of pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 475, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, Z.; Cai, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Xie, X. Construction of carbon-doped supramolecule-based g-C3N4/TiO2 composites for removal of diclofenac and carbamazepine: A comparative study of operating parameters, mechanisms, degradation pathways. J. Hazard Mater. 2019, 380, 120812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Yang, X.; Liang, G.; Xie, X. Insight into enhanced carbamazepine photodegradation over biochar-based magnetic photocatalyst Fe3O4/BiOBr/BC under visible LED light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, L.; Jia, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, P.; Yu, D.; Zhao, C.; He, J.; Zhan, C.; Lai, B. Visible-light induced activation of persulfate by self-assembled EHPDI/TiO2 photocatalyst toward efficient degradation of carbamazepine. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 783, 146996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; Wang, C.C. Photocatalytic degradation of DOM in urban stormwater runoff with TiO2 nanoparticles under UV light irradiation: EEM-PARAFAC analysis and influence of co-existing inorganic ions. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bouarioua, A.; Zerdaoui, M. Photocatalytic activities of TiO2 layers immobilized on glass substrates by dip-coating technique toward the decolorization of methyl orange as a model organic pollutant. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sánchez-Rodríguez, D.; Méndez Medrano, M.G.; Remita, H.; Escobar-Barrios, V. Photocatalytic properties of BiOCl-TiO2 composites for phenol photodegradation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saleh, T.S.; Badawi, A.K.; Salama, R.S.; Mostafa, M.M.M. Design and Development of Novel Composites Containing Nickel Ferrites Supported on Activated Carbon Derived from Agricultural Wastes and Its Application in Water Remediation. Materials 2023, 16, 2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Fu, W.; Sun, Y.; Dai, Y. Core–Sheath CeO2/SiO2 Nanofibers as Nanoreactors for Stabilizing Sinter-Resistant Pt, Enhanced Catalytic Oxidation and Water Remediation. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 1278–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alshorifi, F.T.; Ali, S.L.; Salama, R.S. Promotional Synergistic Effect of Cs–Au NPs on the Performance of Cs–Au/MgFe2O4 Catalysts in Catalysis 3,4-Dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-Ones and Degradation of RhB Dye. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2022, 32, 3765–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qi, K.; Song, M.; Xie, X.; Wen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wei, B.; Wang, Z. CQDs/biochar from reed straw modified Z-scheme MgIn2S4/BiOCl with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance for carbamazepine degradation in water. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sakkas, V.A.; Lambropoulou, D.A.; Albanis, T.A. Study of chlorothalonil photodegradation in natural waters and in the presence of humic substances. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 939–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kato, S.; Hattori, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Miyazaki, Y.; Ishii, G.; Koura, S.; Negishi, N. Development of monolithic titanium dioxide ceramic photocatalysts with high physical rigidity and photocatalytic activity for underwater use. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 19285–19292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Banerjee, P.; Eckert, A.O.; Schrey, A.K.; Preissner, R. ProTox-II: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W257–W263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, A.; Shoeb, M.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Khan, M.A. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of antibiotic drug and dye pollutants by graphene-ordered mesoporous silica (SBA 15)/TiO2 nanocomposite under visible-light irradiation. J. Mol. Liquids 2021, 324, 114696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Bi, W.; Wu, Y.; Dong, W. Photodegradation of carbamazepine with BiOCl/Fe3O4 catalyst under simulated solar light irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 502, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bui, V.H.; Vu, T.K.; To, H.T.; Negishi, N. Application of TiO2-ceramic/UVA photocatalyst for the photodegradation of sulfamethoxazole. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 26, 100617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mao, X.; Li, M.; Li, M. Fabrication of Bi4O5Br2 photocatalyst for carbamazepine degradation under visible-light irradiation. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, A.Y.-C.; Reinhard, M. Photodegradation of common environmental pharmaceuticals and estrogens in river water. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Selli, E.; Baglio, D.; Montanarella, L.; Bidoglio, G. Role of humic acids in the TiO2-photocatalyzed degradation of tetrachloroethene in water. Water Res. 1999, 33, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ren, D.; Huang, B.; Bi, T.; Xiong, D.; Pan, X. Effects of pH and dissolved oxygen on the photodegradation of 17α-ethynylestradiol in dissolved humic acid solution. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts 2016, 18, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Negishi, N.; Miyazaki, Y.; Kato, S.; Yang, Y. Effect of HCO3 concentration in groundwater on TiO2 photocatalytic water purification. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 242, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lyu, X.J.; Li, W.W.; Lam, P.K.S.; Yu, H.Q. Photodegradation of perfluorooctane sulfonate in environmental matrices. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 151, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luna-Sanguino, G.; Ruíz-Delgado, A.; Duran-Valle, C.J.; Malato, S.; Faraldos, M.; Bahamonde, A. Impact of water matrix and oxidant agent on the solar assisted photodegradation of a complex mix of pesticides over titania-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Catal. Today 2021, 380, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rioja, N.; Zorita, S.; Peñas, F.J. Effect of water matrix on photocatalytic degradation and general kinetic modeling. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 180, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, X.; Wang, W.; Li, C. Removal and mineralization of toluene under VUV/UV lamp irradiation in humid air: Effect of light wavelength, O2 and H2O. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Irawaty, W.; Friedmann, D.; Scott, J.; Amal, R. Relationship between mineralization kinetics and mechanistic pathway during malic acid photodegradation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2011, 335, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dudziak, S.; Bielan, Z.; Kubica, P.; Zielinska-Jurek, A. Optimization of carbamazepine photodegradation on defective TiO2-based magnetic photocatalyst. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Donner, E.; Kosjek, T.; Qualmann, S.; Kusk, K.O.; Heath, E.; Revitt, D.M.; Ledin, A.; Andersen, H.R. Ecotoxicity of carbamazepine and its UV photolysis transformation products. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 443, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ferguson, L.R.; Denny, W.A. Genotoxicity of non-covalent interactions: DNA intercalators. Mutat. Res.—Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2007, 623, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, Y.; Ma, M.; Li, N.; Hou, R.; Huang, C.; Oda, Y.; Wang, Z. Chlorination, chloramination and ozonation of carbamazepine enhance cytotoxicity and genotoxicity: Multi-endpoint evaluation and identification of its genotoxic transformation products. J. Hazard Mater. 2018, 342, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The degradation system of carbamazepine.
Figure 1. The degradation system of carbamazepine.
Water 15 01583 g001
Figure 6. Chromatogram by HPLC of the degradation process of CBZ.
Figure 6. Chromatogram by HPLC of the degradation process of CBZ.
Water 15 01583 g006
Figure 7. Proposed by-products of CBZ degradation in visible light.
Figure 7. Proposed by-products of CBZ degradation in visible light.
Water 15 01583 g007
Figure 8. Peaks mass of carbamazepine and some by-products.
Figure 8. Peaks mass of carbamazepine and some by-products.
Water 15 01583 g008
Figure 9. Reusability of the photocatalyst.
Figure 9. Reusability of the photocatalyst.
Water 15 01583 g009
Table 1. Gradient for the mobile phase of HPLC.
Table 1. Gradient for the mobile phase of HPLC.
Time (min)Flow Rate
Table 2. Identification of by-products in the photodegradation of CBZ.
Table 2. Identification of by-products in the photodegradation of CBZ.
Acetic acidC2H4O260Water 15 01583 i001
AcridineC13H9N180Water 15 01583 i002
AcridoneC13H9NO196Water 15 01583 i003
Acridine-9-carboxylic acidC14H9NO2223Water 15 01583 i004
PhenytoinC15H12N2O2253Water 15 01583 i005
10,11-dihydro-10,11-dihydroxycarbamazepineC15H14N2O3270Water 15 01583 i006
Table 3. The toxicity of carbamazepine and by-products.
Table 3. The toxicity of carbamazepine and by-products.
NamePredicted Toxicity Class
Acetic acid4
Acridine-9-carboxylic acid5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nghia, T.H.; Khanh, V.T.; Vu, C.T.; Oanh, N.T.K.; Van Anh, N.T.; Luyen, L.H.; Negishi, N.; Ouillon, S.; Van Hoi, B. Removal of Carbamazepine in Aqueous Solution by TiO2 Ceramic Photo-Catalyst under Simulated Solar Light: Kinetics, Effects of Environmental Factors and Degradation Pathways. Water 2023, 15, 1583.

AMA Style

Nghia TH, Khanh VT, Vu CT, Oanh NTK, Van Anh NT, Luyen LH, Negishi N, Ouillon S, Van Hoi B. Removal of Carbamazepine in Aqueous Solution by TiO2 Ceramic Photo-Catalyst under Simulated Solar Light: Kinetics, Effects of Environmental Factors and Degradation Pathways. Water. 2023; 15(8):1583.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nghia, Trinh Hoang, Vu Toan Khanh, Cam Tu Vu, Nguyen Thi Kieu Oanh, Nguyen Thi Van Anh, Le Hong Luyen, Nobuaki Negishi, Sylvain Ouillon, and Bui Van Hoi. 2023. "Removal of Carbamazepine in Aqueous Solution by TiO2 Ceramic Photo-Catalyst under Simulated Solar Light: Kinetics, Effects of Environmental Factors and Degradation Pathways" Water 15, no. 8: 1583.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop