The Impact of Water Resources Tax Policy on Water Saving Behavior
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Mechanisms of the Impact of Water Resources Tax on People’s Lives
2.2. The Mechanism of the Impact of Water Resources Tax on Enterprise Production
2.3. Comprehensive Impact Mechanism of Water Resources Tax on Social Development
3. Material and Methods
- Hypothesis 1: On the production side, the market structure is assumed to be a perfectly competitive market in which manufacturers follow the principles of cost minimization and profit maximization when producing, and the production function has the characteristic of constant returns to scale.
- Hypothesis 2: On the consumption side, residents consume various goods according to the principle of utility maximization, and their utility is modeled using the constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) function.
- Hypothesis 3: Capital, labor, and water resources are freely mobilizable, while wages conform to the supply and demand theorem and are free to change instantaneously.
- Hypothesis 4: only the government department levies the water resources tax, and it is used only for water resources protection management and infrastructure construction expenditure.
- Introducing the water resources factor into the production function.
- Introduction of water resources tax into the production cost of enterprises.
3.4.4. Market Equilibrium
4.1. Parameter Estimation
4.1.1. Calibration of Structural Parameters
4.1.2. Dynamic Parameter Estimation
4.2. Calculation of Steady-State Values
4.3. Impulse Response Analysis of Water Resources Tax Shocks
4.3.1. Responses of Enterprises to Water Resources Tax Shocks
4.3.2. Resident Response to the Water Resources Tax Shock
4.3.3. Comprehensive Impact of Water Resources Tax on the Economy and Society
- The collection of a water resource tax can effectively achieve the water-saving goal, and help promote water-saving production in enterprises, change the industrial water consumption structure, and improve the utilization efficiency of water resources.
- The collection of the water resources tax is conducive to improving the water-saving consciousness of enterprises and residents, and the price mechanism adjustment helps encourage enterprises to change the water intake mode and optimize the production structure.
- The collection of the water resources tax effectively protects the water ecological environment and improves the recycling capacity of water resources and the water supply capacity in meeting water demand.
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
- Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Chang, J. Development of a coupled quantity-quality-environment water allocation model applying the optimization-simulation method. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 944–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, J.L.; Feng, R.G.; Xia, J. Constraining factors to sustainable utilization of water resources and their countermeasures in China. Chinese Geogr. Sci. 2003, 13, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majeed, A.; Wang, Y.; Muniba; Islam, M.A. The Impact of Social Preferences on Supply Chain Performance: An Application of the Game Theory Model. Complexity 2023, 2023, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, A.; Zaporozhets, V. Bargaining Over Environmental Budgets: A Political Economy Model with Application to French Water Policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2017, 68, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Lago, M.; Mysiak, J.; Gómez, C.M.; Delacámara, G.; Maziotis, A. Defining and assessing economic policy instruments for sustainable water management. In Global Issues in Water Policy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 14, pp. 1–13. ISBN 9783319182872. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Q. Water Resource Tax Reform to Build Resource-saving Society. J. Coast. Res. 2020, 115, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Zhao, J.; Ni, J. Green tax legislation for sustainable development in china. Singapore Econ. Rev. 2018, 63, 1059–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabohi, M.; Soltani, G.R.; Zibaie, M. Evaluation of the strategies for groundwater resources management: A case study in Narimani plain, Khorasan Province. J. Sci. Technol. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2007, 11, 475–484. [Google Scholar]
- Llop, M.; Ponce-Alifonso, X. Identifying the role of final consumption in structural path analysis: An application to water uses. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 109, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Berrittella, M.; Rehdanz, K.; Roson, R.; Tol, R.S.J. The economic impact of water taxes: A computable general equilibrium analysis with an international data set. Water Policy 2008, 10, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berck, P.; Moe-Lange, J.; Stevens, A.; Villas-Boas, S. Measuring Consumer Responses to a Bottled Water Tax Policy. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2016, 98, 981–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Qin, C.; Jia, Y.; Su, Z.; Bressers, H.T.A.; Wang, H. The economic impact of water tax charges in China: A static computable general equilibrium analysis. Water Int. 2012, 37, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushtaq, S.; Khan, S.; Dawe, D.; Hanjra, M.A.; Hafeez, M.; Asghar, M.N. Evaluating the impact of Tax-for-Fee reform (Fei Gai Shui) on water resources and agriculture production in the Zhanghe Irrigation System, China. Food Policy 2008, 33, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kilimani, N.; van Heerden, J.; Bohlmann, H. Water taxation and the double dividend hypothesis. Water Resour. Econ. 2015, 10, 68–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Shen, J.; Luo, C. Overall review of renewable energy subsidy policies in China - Contradictions of intentions and effects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1478–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, C.; Guo, F.; Wang, A. Exploring the impacts of China’s water resource tax policies: A trade-off between economic development and ecological protection. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, R.; Mu, E.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hu, J.; Tong, H.; Cheng, Z. Assessing the effectiveness and function of the water resources tax policy pilot in China. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, L.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, S.; Song, P. The effectiveness of a water resource tax policy in improving water-use efficiency: A quasi-natural experiment-based approach. Water Policy 2022, 24, 899–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, L.; Mou, M.; Tang, H. Does the water resource ‘fee to tax’ policy alleviate water poverty? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Water Supply 2022, 22, 8465–8482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F. Challenges for water security and sustainable socio-economic development: A case study of industrial, domestic water use and pollution management in Shandong, China. Water 2019, 11, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kydland, F.E.; Prescott, E.C. Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica 1982, 50, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Dhawan, R.; Jeske, K.; Silos, P. Productivity, energy prices and the great moderation: A new link. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 2010, 13, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Angelopoulos, K.; Economides, G.; Philippopoulos, A. First-and second-best allocations under economic and environmental uncertainty. Int. Tax Public Financ. 2013, 20, 360–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filardo, A.J. Monetary Policy and Asset Price Bubbles: Calibrating the Monetary Policy Trade-Offs. SSRN Electron. J. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Sun, C.; Xu, Z.; Zheng, H. Green transformation of the building industry and the government policy effects: Policy simulation based on the DSGE model. Energy 2023, 268, 126721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benavides, C.; Gonzales, L.; Diaz, M.; Fuentes, R.; García, G.; Palma-Behnke, R.; Ravizza, C. The impact of a carbon tax on the chilean electricity generation sector. Energies 2015, 8, 2674–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Majeed, A.; Ye, C.; Chenyun, Y.; Wei, X. Muniba Roles of natural resources, globalization, and technological innovations in mitigation of environmental degradation in BRI economies. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argentiero, A.; Bollino, C.A.; Micheli, S.; Zopounidis, C. Renewable energy sources policies in a Bayesian DSGE model. Renew. Energy 2018, 120, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llop, M.; Ponce-Alifonso, X. A never-ending debate: Demand versus supply water policies. A CGE analysis for Catalonia. Water Policy 2012, 14, 694–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Z.; Li, H. Ecological deficit tax: A tax design and simulation of compensation for ecosystem service value based on ecological footprint in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.R.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, X. Analysis of the Fee-to-Tax Reform on Water Resources in China. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, D. The Economic and Environmental Effects of Green Financial Policy in China: A DSGE Approach. SSRN Electron. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Peng, W. Carbon Tax, Subsidy, and Emission Reduction: Analysis Based on DSGE Model. Complexity 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, D.; Wang, F.; Chen, N.; Chen, J. The impacts of technology shocks on sustainable development from the perspective of energy structure—a dsge model approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y. Examining the economic and environmental effects of emissions policies in China: A Bayesian DSGE model. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 122026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acemoglu, D.; Aghion, P.; Bursztyn, L.; Hemous, D. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 2012, 102, 131–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Shao, S.; Yang, L.; Huang, T. Theoretical Model and Experience from China of Energy Rebound Effect. Econ. Res. J. 2013, 48, 96–109. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, T.; Yao, X.; Shao, S.; Li, D.; Wang, W. Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: An estimated DSGE model. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2018, 47, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Chen, X. Improvement on the congested government productive spending in stochastic endogenous growth model. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, ICMIC 2012, Wuhan, China, 24–26 June 2012; pp. 426–428. [Google Scholar]
- Majeed, A.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Muniba; Kirikkaleli, D. Modeling the dynamic links among natural resources, economic globalization, disaggregated energy consumption, and environmental quality: Fresh evidence from GCC economies. Resour. Policy 2021, 73, 102204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|Variable||First-Order Lag Coefficient||Standard Error of the Coefficient||t-Test||p v.||Regression Standard Deviation|
|Parameter||Representative Meaning||Calibration Value|
|Subjective discount factor||0.976|
|Reciprocal of the intertemporal elasticity of substitution of consumption||1|
|Inverted Frisch elasticity of labor supply||3|
|Capital depreciation rate||0.08|
|The elasticity of capital output||0.49|
|The elasticity of labor output||0.51|
|The loss rate of water resources||0.27|
|Persistent parameters of monetary policy shocks||0.56|
|Persistent parameters of water resources tax shocks||0.53|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, L.; Muniba; Lakner, Z.; Popp, J. The Impact of Water Resources Tax Policy on Water Saving Behavior. Water 2023, 15, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050916
Wang L, Muniba, Lakner Z, Popp J. The Impact of Water Resources Tax Policy on Water Saving Behavior. Water. 2023; 15(5):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050916Chicago/Turabian Style
Wang, Lei, Muniba, Zoltán Lakner, and József Popp. 2023. "The Impact of Water Resources Tax Policy on Water Saving Behavior" Water 15, no. 5: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050916