Next Article in Journal
Adsorption Behavior of Nonylphenol on Polystyrene Microplastics and Their Cytotoxicity in Human Caco-2 Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
A Hydrological Data Prediction Model Based on LSTM with Attention Mechanism
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Phase Flow Modeling for Bed Erosion by a Plane Jet Impingement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on Microchannel with Addition of Microinserts Aiming Heat Transfer Performance Improvement

by
Shailesh Ranjan Kumar
1 and
Satyendra Singh
2,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Motihari College of Engineering, Motihari 845401, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bipin Tripathi Kumaon Institute of Technology, Dwarahat 263653, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(20), 3291; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203291
Submission received: 10 September 2022 / Revised: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022

Abstract

:
Microchannel technology rapidly established itself as a practicable solution to the problem of the removal of extremely concentrated heat generation in present-day cooling fields. By implementing a better design structure, altering the working fluids and flow conditions, using various materials for fabrication, etc., it is possible to increase the heat transfer performance of microchannels. Two parameters that affect how well a microchannel transfers heat were only recently coupled, and the complicated coupling of the parameter that affects how well a microchannel sink transfers heat is still not well understood. The newest industrial developments, such as micro-electro-mechanical systems, high performance computing systems, high heat density generating future devices, such as 5G/6G devices, fuel cell power plants, etc., all present thermal challenges that require the use of microchannel technology. In this paper, single-phase flow in microchannels of various sizes, with or without microinserts, is described in terms of its thermal-fluid flow properties, including fluid flow characteristics and heat transfer characteristics considering the compound effects of variations of channel size and addition of microinserts. The trials were carried out using distilled water that had thermo-physical characteristics that varied with temperature. A microchannel with microinserts was developed for managing the high heat generation density equipment. The fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics are explored and analyzed for Reynolds numbers ranges from 125 to 4992, for 1 mm channel size, and from 250 to 9985, for 2 mm channel size. The cooling performance criteria are pressure drop characteristics, heat transfer characteristics, and overall performance, whereas the testing parameters were chosen for the variations in channel size and the addition of microinserts. The influence of inserting microinserts on microchannels is discussed. Results suggest that by inserting microinserts, the performance of the heat transfer of microchannels is significantly improved and, also, fluid flow resistance is increased. The criteria of the thermal performance factor are employed to assess the overall performance of the microchannel. Significant intensification of heat transfer is observed with indication that the addition of microinserts to microchannels and reduction in channel sizes exhibited improved overall performance.

1. Introduction

The promising expeditious performance [1] of miniaturized heat-removing devices [2,3] was swiftly established as an efficient and effective cooling system in the modern cooling field. Modern, sophisticated manufacturing techniques allowed for the miniaturisation of innovative, professional equipment that produces an extremely high heat density [4,5] that needs to be removed. Microchannel technology is one such tiny heat-removing technology that is drawn to the challenge of removing tremendous heat density from a restricted zone of equipment with reduced characteristic dimensions [6,7].
The development of microchannel technologies under the leadership of Tuckerman and Pease [8] in 1981 is recognised as a turning point in the field of the contemporary miniaturised cooling field and drew numerous active researchers to work on improving the thermal-hydrodynamic performance of microchannels. The development of manufacturing processes results in devices with progressively more difficult overall shape and size limits for heat removal. Effective microchannel design improvement becomes essential to overcome these issues. Analyzing the pressure drop, heat transfer, and overall performance is necessary for the efficient design and development of microchannels [9,10,11].
Numerous studies discussed various factors that affect the performance of microchannels. These performance-influencing factors include the channel’s geometry, including its size, shape, and cross-section; the placement of the fluid flow; and the temperature-dependent properties of fluid related to heat transfer [12,13,14,15,16]. Numerous researchers suggested changing the flow of the channels in many different ways to increase the performance of the microchannel [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Researchers also identified other strategies for enhancing microchannel performance. These include using various working fluids, such as nano-fluids/R134a, altering the material of microchannel’s, etc. It was demonstrated that altering the microchannel’s structure by adding complexity to it in order to improve performance is an efficient approach to do so. Recently, researchers added complexities to the structure of microchannels in different forms, such as adding pin fins [23,24,25,26,27,28], cavities [29], ribs [30,31], inserts [32,33,34], corrugations [35], or a staggered microchannel [36]. However, an insufficient research was done to draw firm conclusions regarding how changing the structure of microchannels may affect their performance. In the past, the majority of works were focused on the investigation of the influences of certain factors, such as either variation in shape [37,38,39,40], geometry [41,42,43], working fluids [44,45,46], materials [47,48,49], etc., on the microchannel performance. Very few researchers began to report concerning the study of the compound effect of two or more parameters that influence the performance of the microchannel [50,51].
Microchannel heat sinks deal with thermal challenges associated with the latest industrial developments, such as micro-electro-mechanical systems, including microchips, high-performance computing systems, high-power density batteries, high-power magnets, and high-heat density generating future devices, such as 5G/6G devices, fuel cell power plants, energy, material processing, solar cells and air-conditioning systems, chemical industries, etc. [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65].
The exploration of the compound effect of change in the structures and cross-section is in nascent age [66]. It requires more study for clear insight into the effect of the compounding of two or more factors. Because of a lack of insights on the influences of multi-factors, it is essential to carry out further investigations on the compound effect of variations in channel size and modifications in the microchannel structures.
It was discovered that the influence on heat transfer gets accompanied with other concurrent compound effects of loss of flow or increase in pump effort as the complexity of the cross-section, as well as the arrangement of the flow, grows. According to past research, it is important to continue investigating the simultaneous combined effects of two or more factors influencing heat transfer performance. The novelty of the present work includes the consideration of the variation in channel size and the addition of microinserts, simultaneously.
By looking at the merit of modifications of structure in the form of pin fins or corrugations or ribs, this paper considered modification of structure in the form of microinserts. In this paper, thermal-hydrodynamic fluid flow features of single-phase fluid flow through microchannels of different sizes, with or without microinserts, is investigated. This paper reports the pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of microchannels considering the compound effects of variations in channel size and addition of microinserts. This paper defined the cooling performance criteria as pressure drop characteristics, heat transfer characteristics, and overall performance. The testing parameter was chosen as the variations in channel size and the addition of micro inserts.

2. Experiment

2.1. Experimental Set-Up

For the present paper, single-phase fluid flow through microchannels of various channel sizes with the addition of microinserts is considered. The experimental set-up designed to measure the fluid flow characteristics and thermal performance of the performance of microchannels with microinserts are depicted in Figure 1, which demonstrates the photographic view of the experimental set-up and the test section. The experimental facility’s schematic diagram is shown in Figure 2, and it was established to evaluate the microchannel’s pressure loss and heat transfer characteristics, as well as its thermal-hydrodynamic properties.
The experimental facility can be thought of as consisting of four main subsystems, generally speaking. The heating system might be considered the first subsystem. The second subsystem might be thought of as the management and supply of the working fluid. The test portion could be thought of as the third subsystem. The fourth one may be viewed as the one that gathers information and records output from various sensors as tests are being carried out.
Figure 1 displays an image of the completed experimental test set-up. The experimental set-up comprised of a hot water tank, cold water tank, pump for water circulation, flowmeter, microchannel test section, differential pressure-meter, pipelines, and data logger. Figure 3 depicts the photographic view of a microchannel.
The test modules for microchannels consist of the three components: the centre plate, the heater plate, and the microchannel. Following installation, twelve nuts and bolts are utilised for tight assembly. The top cover plate’s bottom surface is pushed up against the top surface of the housing component by the nut bolts. The microchannel under inquiry has a circular cross-section. The microchannel’s geometric measurements are 104 mm (L) × 10 mm (W) × 3 mm (H). The microchannel heat sink had complexity added to it in the form of microinserts. The cross-section of the microinserts is rectangular. Microinserts and microchannels both use the same material. Microchannels and microinserts were created together. The rectangular microinserts have the following measurements: 4.98 mm (L) × 2 mm (W) × 1.5 mm (H). The microchannel is made up of aluminium. Experiments were performed and data were obtained at the atmospheric temperature condition of 26 °C.
Seventeen thermocouples in total were utilised to measure different temperatures in the experiments. There were nine thermocouples inserted inside the microchannel test section at the gap of 1 mm, in addition to four thermocouples at the inlet and outlet of hot and cold fluid flow. Four thermocouples were utilised to determine the bulk temperature of the hot water tank, with one touching the top surface and another one touching the bottom layer, and the other two placed throughout the height of the tank with equal spacing. Temperatures were measured with type K thermocouples. The readings of thermocouples were captured during data collection using a data logger that had a direct connection to a personal computer.

2.2. Scaling Parameters and Uncertainty

In this section, the parameters [67] defining the thermo-hydraulic characteristics of the microchannel used in the calculation and evaluation criteria are described. The definition of the Reynolds number ( R e ) and hydraulic diameter ( D h ) at the microchannel inlet are as follows:
R e = ρ U D h µ
where ρ is the density of the fluid in the unit of kg/m3, U is the fluid velocity in the unit of m/s,   µ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid in the unit of Pa-s, and D h is the hydraulic diameter at the microchannel inlet in the unit of mm. The hydraulic diameter is defined in terms of width W and the height H , both in the unit of mm, as follows:
D h = 2 WH W + H .
The pressure drops Δ p and friction factor f of the microchannel are evaluated as follows:
Δ p = p i n p o u t
f = D h 0.5 ρ U 2 Δ P L
where p i n and p o u t are pressures measured at the inlet and outlet of the microchannel, respectively, in the unit of N/m2. ρ is fluid density expressed in kg/m3, measured at the arithmetic mean of temperature at the inlet and outlet of the microchannel. Microchannel length is denoted by L in the unit of mm.
The non-dimensional parameter average Nusselt number Nu is evaluated as
N u = D h k f , m m C p T b , o u t T b , i n A s T w T b
where k f , m is the fluid thermal conductivity expressed in W/m-K and measured at the arithmetic mean of temperature at the inlet and outlet of the microchannel. A s is the contact surface area, measured in the unit of mm2, at which fluid and microchannel are in contact, and is defined as:
A s = W + 2 H   L  
In this paper, in order to assess the improved performance offered by modified heat transfer surfaces for different-sized microchannels, the treatment of the thermal performance factor (TPF) is adopted. It is defined as a ratio of the heat transfer coefficient of the modified microchannel to that for the plain microchannel, keeping pumping power (pp) the same [68]. Therefore, TPF is evaluated as
T P F = h h s P P = N u N u s P P = N u N u s f f s 1 3
The uncertainty in primary measurement forms the basis of computation of uncertainties for the various quantities. The maximum uncertainties in the measurements of voltage and temperature are about ±0.5 V and ±0.2 °C, respectively. The uncertainty associated with the measurement of pressure drop and friction factor are about 4% and 6%, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Pressure Drop Characteristics

For viscous fluid flow through the channel, there is fluid resistance offered because of the viscosity of fluid, resulting in gradual decrement of the fluid pressure. Figure 4 shows variation in the pressure drops and friction factor with the Reynolds number. Clearly, values of pressure loss of channel with microinserts were significantly more than that of in channel without microinserts. The pressure loss curve is found to be almost linearly incremental with Reynolds number, except at lower values. The pressure drop with microinserts always shows a greater pressure drop than that of without microinserts. It was found that microchannel with microinserts induces 8–32%, for 1 mm, and 5–103%, for 2 mm, higher pressure drops than without microinserts. Additionally, a microchannel with microinserts has a greater friction factor than without microinserts. This is due to reason that microinserts induce more disruptions in fluid flow at increased flow velocity, causing larger frictional pressure loss due to high resistance to fluid flow. This results in high consumption of pump power for the microchannel with microinserts compared to without microinserts. The pressure drops observed in the test section are because of the flow friction (f) along the liquid flow path of the channel. The pressure drops increase approximately linearly with increasing fluid velocity. Figure 4 shows that at higher Reynolds number pressure drop of a channel with microinserts was significantly larger than that of a channel without microinserts. This is because of the increment in vortices formation due to increasing Reynolds number, leading to higher flow resistance. For a smaller Reynolds number, the values of the pressure drop of channels with and without microinserts were was found to be close to each other. However, at the higher Reynolds number, there was a sharp increment in the value of the pressure drop of the channel with microinserts with respect to the channel without microinserts.

3.2. Heat Transfer Characteristics

Variation in different parameters with a mass flow rate for a 1 mm and 2 mm channel size is shown in Figure 5. It presents the variations of the outlet temperature, heat transfer rate, overall heat transfer coefficients, and effectiveness with the mass flow rate in the channel. It depicts the relationship between hot–cold side outlet temperatures (for both with and without microinserts) and cold side mass flow rates. It illustrates the thermal behavior of microchannels with or without microinserts. In the present study, the experiments are performed for two different channel sizes of 1 mm and 2 mm, with conditions of with and without microinserts. The primary factors affecting a heat exchange device’s thermal performance are linked to important factors, including the total heat transfer coefficient, the number of transfer units (NTU), effectiveness, etc.
Using Newton’s law of cooling, the overall heat transfer coefficient is calculated in this study and is as follows:
Q = U A Δ T L M T D
where Q , A , and Δ T L M T D are heat transfer rate, surface area, and log mean temperature difference, respectively.
The inlet temperature of the cold side and hot side were maintained at 30 °C and 50 °C, respectively. For the hotter side, constant mass flow rate was fixed at 0.782 g/s and 3.127 g/s for 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. For the colder side, the mass flow rate varied from 0.156 g/s to 6.255 g/s for 1 mm, and from 0.625 g/s to 25.02 g/s for the 2 mm channel size. A comparison of results obtained from experimental data for 1 mm and 2 mm stated conditions is presented in Figure 5. It is found that the outlet temperatures decrease as the mass flow rate of the colder side increase. Since the exchanger considered under study is parallel flow, the temperature of the colder side is always lesser than the outlet temperature of the hot side. It is found that the maximum temperatures for the channel without the microinserts are lesser than that of the channel with microinserts. This indicates that the heat transfer performance of the channel with microinserts was improved.
The overall heat transfer coefficient in the channel with microinserts is significantly higher than that of in the channel without microinserts for both channel sizes. By increasing mass flow rate from 0.16 g/s to 6.25 g/s in the 1 mm channel and from 0.63 g/s to 25.02 g/s for the 2 mm channel, it is found that the overall heat transfer coefficients increased by factor of 1.94–2.41 and 2.03–2.17 for 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively.
Figure 6 depicts plots of the Nusselt number against the Reynolds number for microchannel with and without microinserts. The Nusselt number measures how well a microchannel transfers heat. It measures the proportion of the overall heat transfer to the conductive heat transfer at the fluid flow wall. An increment of the Nusselt number is found because of microinserts at the same value of the Reynolds number. It indicates that the heat transfer rate of the channel with microinserts was better than that of the channel without microinserts. Clearly, the effects of microinserts on heat transfer performance were less pronounced at very low and high ranges of the Reynolds number. The increment in the Reynolds number has an effect of increasing the Nusselt number because of the thin boundary layer formation near the channel walls, resulting in enhanced heat transfer characteristics. The enhanced heat transfer was observed along with an increased pressure drop. However, the high Reynolds number does not allow to have an effective heat transfer between walls of the channel and flowing fluid, as such in a moderate Reynolds number.
The Nusselt number of a microchannel with microinserts is higher than it would be without them, demonstrating how the addition of microinserts improves heat transfer performance. The Nusselt number grows as the channel size decreases. While it becomes flatter as the channel size grows, the slope of the increase in the Nusselt number with the rising Reynolds number is steeper for small channels. This suggests that the performance of heat the transfer can be considerably improved by using narrower channels. Increased convective area and improved flow disturbances are the reason for these improvements in heat transfer characteristics. At two extremes of Reynolds number values, it is discovered that the influence of microinserts on heat transfer enhancement is less pronounced. Microinserts significantly enhance heat transfer properties when Reynolds numbers are in the moderate range for each instance. Effective heat transfer improvement, due to the addition of microinserts, is hindered at very high Reynolds numbers, in contrast to moderate Reynolds numbers. The addition of microinserts to the microchannel improves heat transmission performance.
It is also found that for smaller channel sizes, as the Reynolds number rises, the Nusselt number rises initially abruptly and then gradually. It implies that the heat transfer between the fluid and the channel wall occurs initially more quickly and thereafter more slowly. This demonstrates that as the Reynolds number rises, the temperature difference between the fluid and the channel wall first decreases quickly before slowing down. By disrupting the thermal barrier layer, the inclusion of microinserts leads to more consistent temperature gradients in fluid flow fields, which is advantageous to enhancing heat transfer. Thus, the insertion of microinserts to microchannels enhances the efficiency of the thermal energy transfer.

3.3. Overall Performance Evaluation

The analyzed result shows that microinserts improve the heat transfer performance with the increased resistance to the fluid flow. This necessitates the evaluation of the overall performance of the microchannel. To assess the overall performance, criteria of thermal performance factor (TPF) are used, which is defined as the ratio of heat transfer increment to friction factor increment.
Figure 7 shows the plot of the friction factor (f/fs) and heat transfer performance enhancement factor (Nu/Nus) against the Reynolds number, where fs and Nus are the friction factor and Nusselt number, respectively, for the plain microchannel. It is clear that as the Reynolds number increases, the values of f/fs are found to increase. However, rate of increment of f/fs is low. At an equal Reynolds number, values of f/fs for a microchannel with microinserts are higher than that without microinserts. The f/fs of a microchannel with microinserts are found to be in the range of 0.003–0.014 and 0.014–0.044 for channel sizes 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively, for the whole Reynolds number. From Figure 7, it is evident that at the same Reynolds number, f/fs for the microchannel with the microinsert is larger as compared to plain microchannel. This result suggests that flow resistance for the channel without microinserts gets more influenced by the decrement of dynamic viscosity due to the increase in fluid temperature than that for the channel without microinserts.
Figure 7 demonstrates that the values of Nu/Nus first increase and then continuously decrease with an increasing Reynolds number for the 1 mm channel. An increasing Reynolds number value of Nu/Nus continuously decreases for the 2 mm channel. It is found that the variation trends of Nu/Nus with the Reynolds number are different for a 1 mm size. For 1 mm, Nu/Nus values increase quickly at first, then decrease sharply, and later decrease slowly with an increase in the Reynolds number. At last, at a higher Reynolds number, it is observed to be an increment in Nu/Nus. For the 2 mm channel, the decrement is sharp and then decreases slowly, and at last the value nearly approaches a limiting value. This suggests that for the 2 mm channel, for a higher Reynolds number, enhancement of performance is not quite sensitive to increments in the Reynolds number. This means an increment in flow rate will not enhance heat transfer performance further.
Additionally, Figure 7 brings noticeable attention to the fact that for any Reynolds number, Nu/Nus values for 2 mm channels with or without microinserts are almost the same and there is little variation in the values of Nu/Nus for a 1 mm channel with or without microinserts. This concludes that thermophysical properties that depend on temperature have influence on the heat transfer performance for lower size microchannels. Nu/Nus are found to be in the range of 0.081–0.177 and 0.098–0.321 for respective 1 mm and 2 mm channel sizes with microinserts.
For larger channel sizes, values of Nu/Nus are seen to be steadily declining with rising Reynolds numbers, with a sharp decline at lower Reynolds numbers and a steady decline at higher Reynolds numbers. Smaller channel sizes respond similarly to big channel sizes throughout a moderate range of Reynolds numbers. Nu/Nus, however, first quickly increase at low Reynolds numbers before continuing to slowly decrease. It is discovered that the increase in Nu/Nus is substantially steeper at low Reynolds numbers, as the channel size continues to shrink. Heat transport is influenced by the inclusion of microinserts being simple for all channel sizes. Additionally, as the channel size gets smaller, microinserts become more important because they speed up heat transfer. This tendency is seen in smaller size channels where temperature-dependent thermo-physical features have a greater impact on heat transfer performance. The insertion of inserts has a significant impact on heat transfer enhancement. It can be concluded that the features that are temperature-dependent are crucial for making such observations.
Figure 8 shows a plot of the thermal performance factor (TPF) against the Reynolds number. It is found that the obtained TPF values of the channel with the microinserts are higher than those in the case of the channel without microinserts for the entire Reynolds number. It is found that TPF decreases as the Reynolds number increases, with a sharp decrease found for a lesser Reynolds number and a blunt decrease for a higher Reynolds number for the 1 mm channel. At a lower Reynolds number, for the 2 mm channel, there is a sharp decrement of TPF and then it decreases very slowly as the Reynolds number increases. This concludes that enhancement in performance is more dominant at a lesser Reynolds number, whereas at a higher Reynolds number, the increment of flow resistance is dominant.
The comparison of the results with the available data (without inserts) is presented in Figure 9. The Reynolds number and the Nusselt number data are taken from published articles of the experimental work conducted [31] and used for comparison. The present findings were discovered to be in agreement and consistency with the reference data. Additionally, the Nusselt number is seen to follow a similar pattern. This examination indicates good reliability of the present proposed model.

4. Conclusions

This paper experimentally investigated the thermo-hydraulic performance of the circular channel of two different sizes with or without rectangular microinserts. Obtained results were compared with channels without microinserts. The main findings are summarized as follows:
  • The microinserts in the channel resulted in higher fluid outlet temperatures, causing lower base temperature when compared with the channel without microinserts.
  • Microinserts performed in enhanced heat transfer, however, also caused a larger pressure drop. Pressure drops of the channel with microinserts were increased by a factor of 1.01–1.32 and 1.05–2.08, corresponding to 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The presence of microinserts resulted in increased flow resistance. It was obvious that temperature-dependent thermo-physical properties influenced the flow resistance.
  • The heat transfer coefficients, effectiveness, NTU, and Nu of channels with microinserts were found to be increased, as compared to that of the channel without microinserts. The values of Nu were found to be larger by a factor of 1.01–1.08 in the case of the 1 mm and 1–1.07 for 2 mm channel sizes. It is indicated that the thermal performance of channels with microinserts improved. Microinserts effectively enhanced the heat transfer performance for both channel sizes.
  • The performance evaluation criteria were employed to assess the overall performance of different channels. The results obtained by this method concluded that the overall performance of the channel with microinserts is better than that for the channel without microinserts for both channel sizes. It was found that microinserts result in the best overall performance at a lower Reynolds number. At a higher Reynolds number, microinserts improve the overall performance only marginally.
In conclusion, this paper investigated the compound effects of variation in channel size and addition of microinserts simultaneously to get an insight of thermo-hydrodynamic behaviors of a circular microchannel. The obtained analyzed results show that the presence of microinserts has a significant influence on the performance of the microchannel. The presence of microinserts enhances the heat transfer performance for both sizes of microchannels, with the simultaneous rise of pressure drop as well. However, overall performance is improved because of the addition of microinserts to the microchannel, as well as with decreasing channel sizes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R.K.; methodology, S.R.K.; software, S.R.K.; validation, S.R.K.; formal analysis, S.R.K.; investigation, S.R.K.; resources, S.R.K.; data curation, S.R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R.K.; writing—review and editing, S.S.; visualization, S.R.K.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

SymbolsDescriptionsUnit
AsContact surface area of the fluid and microchannelmm2
cpSpecific heat of waterJ/kg-K
DhHydraulic diametermm
fFriction factor
HHeight of the microchannelmm
hHeat transfer coefficientW/m2-K
kfThermal conductivity of fluidJ/s-m-K
KsSolid thermal conductivityJ/s-m-K
LLength of the microchannelmm
mMass kg
NuNusselt number
pPressure Pa
ReReynolds Number
TTemperatureK
TPFThermal performance factor
UFluid velocitym/s
WWidth of the microchannelmm
ΔpPressure difference
ΔTTemperature difference
Greek symbols
ρFluid densitykg/m3
µDynamic viscosityPa-s
Subscript
fFluid
sSolid

References

  1. Gao, J.; Hu, Z.; Yang, Q.; Liang, X.; Wu, H. Fluid flow and heat transfer in microchannel heat sinks: Modelling review and recent progress. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2022, 29, 101203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ameel, T.A.; Warrington, R.O.; Wegeng, R.S.; Drost, M.K. Miniaturization technologies applied to energy systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 1997, 38, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dixit, T.; Ghosh, I. Review of micro- and mini-channel heat sinks and heat exchangers for single phase fluids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1298–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdoli, A.; Jimenez, G.; Dulikravich, G.S. Thermo-fluid analysis of micro pin-fin array cooling configurations for high heat fluxes with a hot spot. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2015, 90, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sohel Murshed, S.M.; Nieto de Castro, C.A. A critical review of traditional and emerging techniques and fluids for electronics cooling. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, X.; Hong, X.; Xu, L.; Li, Y.; Yan, M.; Mai, L. On-chip micro/nano devices for energy conversion and storage. Nano Today 2019, 28, 100764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alihosseini, Y.; Zabetian, M.; Mohammad, T.; Heyhat, M. Thermo-hydraulic performance of wavy microchannel heat sink with oblique grooved finned. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 189, 116719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tuckerman, D.B.; Pease, R.F.W. High-Performance Heat Sinking for VLSI. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 1981, 2, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asadi, M.; Gongnan, X.; Sunden, B. A review of heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of single and two-phase microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 79, 34–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mansoor, M.M.; Wong, K.C.; Siddique, M. Numerical investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer under high heat flux using rectangular micro-channels. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 39, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qu, W.; Mudawar, I. Analysis of three-dimensional heat transfer in micro-channel heat sinks. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2002, 45, 3973–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Gao, J. Influence of geometric parameters on flow and heat transfer performance of micro-channel heat sinks. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 107, 870–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xia, G.D.; Jiang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhai, Y.L.; Ma, D.D. Effects of different geometric structures on fluid flow and heat transfer performance in microchannel heat sinks. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 80, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gawali, B.S.; Swami, V.B.; Thakre, S.D. Theoretical and experimental investigation of heat transfer characteristics through a rectangular microchannel heat sink. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 3, 15631–15640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alfaryjat, A.A.; Mohammed, H.A.; Adam, N.M.; Ariffin, M.K.A.; Najafabadi, M.I. Influence of geometrical parameters of hexagonal, circular and rhombus microchannel heat sinks on the thermohydraulic characteristics. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 52, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chiu, H.C.; Jang, J.H.; Yeh, H.W.; Wu, M.S. The heat transfer characteristics of liquid cooling heat sink containing microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2011, 54, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, H.; Wu, H.; Zhang, C. An experimental study on flow friction and heat transfer of water in sinusoidal wavy silicon microchannels. J. Micromechanics Microengineering 2018, 28, 55003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chai, L.; Wang, L. Thermal-hydraulic performance of interrupted microchannel heat sinks with different rib geometries in transverse microchambers. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2018, 127, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi, M.; Sahamiyan, M. Performance of nanofluid flow in corrugated minichannels heat sink. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 108, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, D.D.; Xia, G.D.; Li, Y.F.; Jia, Y.T.; Wang, J. Effects of structural parameters on fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics in microchannel with offset zigzag grooves in sidewall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 101, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deng, D.; Wan, W.; Tang, Y.; Shao, H.; Huang, Y. Experimental and numerical study of thermal enhancement in reentrant copper microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 91, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sui, Y.; Lee, P.S.; Teo, C.J. An experimental study of flow friction and heat transfer in wavy microchannels with rectangular cross section. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2011, 50, 2473–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zeng, L.; Deng, D.; Zhong, N.; Zheng, G. Thermal and flow performance in microchannel heat sink with open-ring pin fins. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2021, 200, 106445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi, M.; Deldar, S.; Hassani, S.M. Effects of pin-fins geometry and nanofluid on the performance of a pin-fin miniature heat sink (PFMHS). Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 148, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi, M.; Hassani, S.M.; Mazloumi, S.H. Performance enhancement of straight and wavy miniature heat sinks using pin-fin interruptions and nanofluids. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2017, 122, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yeom, T.; Simon, T.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, M.; North, M.; Cui, T. Enhanced heat transfer of heat sink channels with micro pin fin roughened walls. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 92, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Siu-Ho, A.; Qu, W.; Pfefferkorn, F. Experimental study of pressure drop and heat transfer in a single-phase micro pin-fin heat sink. ASME J. Electron Packag. 2007, 129, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peles, Y.; Koşar, A.; Mishra, C.; Kuo, C.; Schneider, B. Forced convective heat transfer across a pin fin micro heat sink. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2005, 48, 3615–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Datta, A.; Sharma, V.; Sanyal, D.; Das, P. A conjugate heat transfer analysis of performance for rectangular microchannel with trapezoidal cavities and ribs. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 138, 425–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bahiraei, M.; Mazaheri, N.; Rizehvandi, A. Application of a hybrid nanofluid containing graphene nanoplatelet-platinum composite powder in a triple-tube heat exchanger equipped with inserted ribs. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 149, 588–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, G.; Qian, N.; Ding, G. Heat transfer enhancement in microchannel heat sink with bidirectional rib. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 136, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, S.R.; Singh, S. CFD analysis for heat transfer and fluid flow in microchannel heat sink with micro inserts. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46 Pt 20, 11213–11216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, S.R.; Singh, S. Numerical Analysis for Augmentation of Thermal Performance of Single-Phase Flow in Microchannel Heat Sink of Different Sizes with or without Micro-Inserts. Fluids 2022, 7, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Feng, Z.; Luo, X.; Guo, F.; Li, H.; Zhang, J. Numerical investigation on laminar flow and heat transfer in rectangular microchannel heat sink with wire coil inserts. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 116, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi, M.; Nozan, F. Water cooled corrugated minichannel heat sink for electronic devices Effect of corrugation shape. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Tran. 2016, 76, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.C.; Xie, G. Comparative study for convective heat transfer of counter-flow wavy double-layer microchannel heat sinks in staggered arrangement. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 137, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ali, A.M.; Ron, A.; Kadhim, H.T.; Angelino, M.; Gao, S. Thermo-hydraulic performance of a circular microchannel heat sink using swirl flow and nanofluid. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 191, 116817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, G.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Sunden, B.; Zhang, W. Comparative study of thermal performance of longitudinal and transversal-wavy microchannel heat sinks for electronic cooling. J. Electron. Packag. 2013, 135, 21008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi, M.; Arani-Lahtari, Z. Forced convection in twisted minichannel (TMC) with different cross section shapes: A numerical study. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 93, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chatterjee, R.; Duryodhan, V.S.; Agrawal, A. Impact of aspect ratio and thermophysical properties on heat transfer behavior in spiral microchannel. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022, 172 Pt A, 107335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khalesi, J.; Sarunac, N. Numerical analysis of flow and conjugate heat transfer for supercritical CO2 and liquid sodium in square microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 132, 1187–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, P. Numerical investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer in trapezoidal microchannel with groove structure. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 136, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, J.; Engelbrecht, K.; Nielsen, K.K.; Loewe, K.; Vieyra, H.; Barcza, A.; Bahl, C.R.H. Performance assessment of a triangular microchannel active magnetic regenerator. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 186, 116519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abdollahi, A.; Norris, S.E.; Sharma, R.N. Fluid flow and heat transfer of liquid-liquid Taylor flow in square microchannels. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 172, 115123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, W.; Mashayekhi, R.; Toghraie, D.; Akbari, O.A.; Li, Z.; Tlili, I. Hydrothermal performance of nanofluid flow in a sinusoidal double layer microchannel in order to geometric optimization. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 117, 104700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, Y.Y.; Lin, T.F. Condensation heat transfer and pressure drop of refrigerant R134a in a small pipe. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1999, 42, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, D.; Ling, X.; Peng, H.; Li, J.; Duan, L. Experimental and numerical analysis on heat transfer performance of slug flow in rectangular microchannel. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 2020, 147, 118963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Derakhshanpour, K.; Kamali, R.; Eslami, M. Effect of rib shape and fillet radius on thermal-hydrodynamic performance of microchannel heat sinks: A CFD study. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 119, 104928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khalesi, J.; Sarunac, N.; Razzaghpanah, Z. Supercritical CO2 conjugate heat transfer and flow analysis in a rectangular microchannel subject to uniformly heated substrate wall. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2020, 19, 100596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alfaryjat, A.A.; Mohammed, H.A.; Adam, N.M.; Stanciu, D.; Dobrovicescu, A. Numerical investigation of heat transfer enhancement using various nanofluids in hexagonal microchannel heat sink. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2018, 5, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, H.; Duan, Z.; Ning, X.; Su, L. Numerical investigation on heat transfer behavior of thermally developing flow inside rectangular microchannels. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 24, 100856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meyari, M.; Salehi, Z.; Zarghami, R.; Saeedipour, M. Numerical investigation of particle separation in Y-shaped bifurcating microchannels. Particuology 2021, 56, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ling, W.; Zhou, W.; Liu, C.; Zhou, F.; Yuan, D.; Huang, J. Structure and geometric dimension optimization of interlaced microchannel for heat transfer performance enhancement. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 170, 115011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rabiei, S.; Khosravi, R.; Bahiraei, M.; Raziei, M.; Hosseini, A.A. Thermal and hydraulic characteristics of a hybrid nanofluid containing graphene sheets decorated with platinum through a new wavy cylindrical microchannel. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 181, 115981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Saha, S.K.; Agrawal, A.; Soni, Y. Heat transfer characterization of rhombic microchannel for H1 and H2 boundary conditions. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2017, 111, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, C.S.; Wei, T.C.; Shen, P.Y.; Liou, T.M. Lattice Boltzmann study of flow pulsation on heat transfer augmentation in a louvered microchannel heat sink. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 2020, 148, 119139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abdollahi, P.; Karimi-Sabet, J.; Moosavian, M.A.; Amini, Y. Microfluidic solvent extraction of calcium: Modeling and optimization of the process variables. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 231, 115875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jahromi, P.F.; Karimi-Sabet, J.; Amini, Y.; Fadaei, H. Pressure-driven liquid-liquid separation in Y-shaped microfluidic junctions. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 328, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jahromi, P.F.; Karimi-Sabet, J.; Amini, Y. Ion-pair extraction-reaction of calcium using Y-shaped microfluidic junctions: An optimized separation approach. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 334, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar]
  60. Marsousi, S.; Karimi-Sabet, J.; Moosavian, M.A.; Amini, Y. Liquid-liquid extraction of calcium using ionic liquids in spiral microfluidics. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 356, 492–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Omar, P.J.; Gaur, S.; Dikshit, P.K.S. Conceptualization and development of multi-layered groundwater model in transient condition. Appl. Water Sci. 2021, 11, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Omar, P.J.; Kumar, V. Land surface temperature retrieval from TIRS data and its relationship with land surface indices. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Omar, P.J.; Shivhare, N.; Dwivedi, S.B.; Dikshit, P.K.S. Identification of soil erosion-prone zone utilizing geo-informatics techniques and WSPM model. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2022, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sadeghi, A.; Amini, Y.; Saidi, M.H.; Chakraborty, S. Numerical modeling of surface reaction kinetics in electrokinetically actuated microfluidic devices. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 838, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sadeghi, A.; Amini, Y.; Saidi, M.H.; Yavari, H. Shear-Rate-Dependent Rheology Effects on Mass Transport and Surface Reactions in Biomicrofluidic Devices. AIChE J. 2015, 61, 1912–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ma, Y.; Liu, C.; Jiaqiang, E.; Mao, X.; Yu, Z. Research on modeling and parameter sensitivity of flow and heat transfer process in typical rectangular microchannels: From a data-driven perspective. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022, 172 Pt B, 107356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, Q.; Su, R.; Xia, H.; Zeng, J.; Chen, J. Numerical simulation study of thermal and hydraulic characteristics of laminar flow in microchannel heat sink with water droplet cavities and different rib columns. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022, 172, 107319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Webb, R.L. Performance evaluation criteria for use of enhanced heat transfer surfaces in heat exchanger design. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1981, 24, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photographic view of (a) the experimental set-up and (b) test section.
Figure 1. Photographic view of (a) the experimental set-up and (b) test section.
Water 14 03291 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of a flow loop.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of a flow loop.
Water 14 03291 g002
Figure 3. (a) Geometric parameters, (b) centre plate containing microchannel and flow path of hot and cold fluid and (c) photographic view of a microchannel with microinserts (unit: mm).
Figure 3. (a) Geometric parameters, (b) centre plate containing microchannel and flow path of hot and cold fluid and (c) photographic view of a microchannel with microinserts (unit: mm).
Water 14 03291 g003aWater 14 03291 g003b
Figure 4. Variation in pressure drop and friction factor against Reynolds number (a) for a 1 mm channel and (b) for a 2 mm channel.
Figure 4. Variation in pressure drop and friction factor against Reynolds number (a) for a 1 mm channel and (b) for a 2 mm channel.
Water 14 03291 g004
Figure 5. Variation in different parameters with mass flow rate for 1 mm and 2 mm channel size.
Figure 5. Variation in different parameters with mass flow rate for 1 mm and 2 mm channel size.
Water 14 03291 g005aWater 14 03291 g005b
Figure 6. Variation in different thermal parameters with the Reynolds number.
Figure 6. Variation in different thermal parameters with the Reynolds number.
Water 14 03291 g006aWater 14 03291 g006b
Figure 7. Variation in f/fs and Nu/Nus with Reynolds number for (a) 1 mm and (b) 2 mm.
Figure 7. Variation in f/fs and Nu/Nus with Reynolds number for (a) 1 mm and (b) 2 mm.
Water 14 03291 g007
Figure 8. Variation in TPF with Reynolds number.
Figure 8. Variation in TPF with Reynolds number.
Water 14 03291 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of the results with the available data (without inserts).
Figure 9. Comparison of the results with the available data (without inserts).
Water 14 03291 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, S.R.; Singh, S. Experimental Study on Microchannel with Addition of Microinserts Aiming Heat Transfer Performance Improvement. Water 2022, 14, 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203291

AMA Style

Kumar SR, Singh S. Experimental Study on Microchannel with Addition of Microinserts Aiming Heat Transfer Performance Improvement. Water. 2022; 14(20):3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Shailesh Ranjan, and Satyendra Singh. 2022. "Experimental Study on Microchannel with Addition of Microinserts Aiming Heat Transfer Performance Improvement" Water 14, no. 20: 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop