Next Article in Journal
Urban Water Management: A Pragmatic Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Satellite-Based Evapotranspiration Models in Temperate Pastures of Southern Chile

A Review of Tank Model and Its Applicability to Various Korean Catchment Conditions

Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra 2601, Australia
H2R Inc., Ilsan, Goyang-si 10306, Korea
Department of Civil Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(12), 3588;
Received: 25 November 2020 / Revised: 17 December 2020 / Accepted: 18 December 2020 / Published: 21 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology)
This paper reviews a conceptual rainfall-runoff model called Tank which has been widely used over the last 20 years in Korea as a part of a water resource modelling framework for assessing and developing long-term water resource polices. In order to examine the uncertainty of model predictions and the sensitivity of model’s parameters, Monte Carlos and Markov chain-based approaches are applied to five catchments of various Korean geographical and climatic conditions where the catchment sizes are ranged from 83 to 4786 km2. In addition, three optimization algorithms—dynamically dimensioned search (DDS), robust parameter estimation (ROPE), and shuffled complex evolution (SCE)—are selected to test whether the model parameters can be optimized consistently within a narrower range than the uncertainty bounds. From the uncertainty analysis, it is found that there is limited success in refining the priori distributions of the model parameters, indicating there is a high degree of equifinality for some parameters or at least there are large numbers of parameter combinations leading to good solutions within model’s uncertainty bounds. Out of the three optimization algorithms, SCE meets the criteria of the consistency best. It is also found that there are still some parameters that even the SCE method struggles to refine the priori distributions. It means that their contribution to model results is minimal and can take a value within a reasonable range. It suggests that the model may be reconceptualized to be parsimonious and to rationalize some parameters without affecting model’s capacity to replicate historical flow characteristics. Cross-validation indicates that sensitive parameters to catchment characteristics can be transferred when geophysical similarity exists between two catchments. Regionalization can be further improved by using a regression or geophysical similarity-based approach to transfer model parameters to ungauged catchments. It may be beneficial to categorize the model parameters depending on the level of their sensitivities, and a different approach to each category may be applied to regionalize the calibrated parameters. View Full-Text
Keywords: conceptual rainfall-runoff model; model uncertainty; parameter estimation conceptual rainfall-runoff model; model uncertainty; parameter estimation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.W.; Chegal, S.D.; Lee, S.O. A Review of Tank Model and Its Applicability to Various Korean Catchment Conditions. Water 2020, 12, 3588.

AMA Style

Lee JW, Chegal SD, Lee SO. A Review of Tank Model and Its Applicability to Various Korean Catchment Conditions. Water. 2020; 12(12):3588.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jong W., Sun D. Chegal, and Seung O. Lee 2020. "A Review of Tank Model and Its Applicability to Various Korean Catchment Conditions" Water 12, no. 12: 3588.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop