Next Article in Journal
Mitigation of Urban Pluvial Flooding: What Drives Residents’ Willingness to Implement Green or Grey Stormwater Infrastructures on Their Property?
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Spatial-Temporal Changes of Oasis Farmland in the Tarim River Basin from the Perspective of Agricultural Water Footprint
Previous Article in Journal
2019–2020 Australia Fire and Its Relationship to Hydroclimatological and Vegetation Variabilities
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Water Footprint of Primary Cow–Calf Production: A Revised Bottom-Up Approach Applied on Different Breeds of Beef Cattle
Review

Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Water and Water Footprint

by 1,*, 1 and 2,*
1
Faculty of Geography, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany
2
School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(11), 3068; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113068
Received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 14 October 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 / Published: 2 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Footprint Assessment Research)
Virtual water and water footprint have received increasing attention. However, no published research has conducted a quantitative and objective review of this field from the perspective of bibliometrics. Therefore, based on the Web of Science Core Collection, this study employs CiteSpace to quantitatively analyze and visualize information about countries, institutions, and authors that have conducted virtual water and water footprint research over the past two decades. As of July 2020, there were 1592 publications on virtual water and water footprint, showing an increasing trend overall. The annual average number of publications was only 7.4 in 1998–2008, while it was 126.5 in 2009–2019. Among them, up to 618 publications in the field of environmental science, accounting for 46%. China was the most productive country with a total of 344 articles, but the Netherlands had the strongest influence with a betweenness centrality of 0.33, indicating its leading position. It is essential to strengthen cooperation between developed (water-rich) and developing (water-poor) countries and to incorporate virtual water into social water cycle research. This study is expected to provide a new perspective for investigating the research frontiers and hot spots of virtual water and water footprint research. View Full-Text
Keywords: virtual water; water footprint; CiteSpace; web of science; bibliometrics virtual water; water footprint; CiteSpace; web of science; bibliometrics
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, W.; Opp, C.; Yang, D. Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Water and Water Footprint. Water 2020, 12, 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113068

AMA Style

Ma W, Opp C, Yang D. Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Water and Water Footprint. Water. 2020; 12(11):3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Weijing; Opp, Christian; Yang, Dewei. 2020. "Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Water and Water Footprint" Water 12, no. 11: 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113068

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop