Next Article in Journal
Considering a Threshold Energy in Reactive Transport Modeling of Microbially Mediated Redox Reactions in an Arsenic-Affected Aquifer
Next Article in Special Issue
A Framework for Assessing the Impacts of Mining Development on Regional Water Resources in Colombia
Previous Article in Journal
Sedimentary Record of Cladoceran Functionality under Eutrophication and Re-Oligotrophication in Lake Maggiore, Northern Italy
Article

Ecosystem Services Mapping Uncertainty Assessment: A Case Study in the Fitzroy Basin Mining Region

1
Environment Centres, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
2
School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Kuala Lumpur 43500, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010088
Received: 23 November 2017 / Revised: 8 January 2018 / Accepted: 10 January 2018 / Published: 19 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Stewardship in Mining Regions)
Ecosystem services mapping is becoming increasingly popular through the use of various readily available mapping tools, however, uncertainties in assessment outputs are commonly ignored. Uncertainties from different sources have the potential to lower the accuracy of mapping outputs and reduce their reliability for decision-making. Using a case study in an Australian mining region, this paper assessed the impact of uncertainties on the modelling of the hydrological ecosystem service, water provision. Three types of uncertainty were modelled using multiple uncertainty scenarios: (1) spatial data sources; (2) modelling scales (temporal and spatial) and (3) parameterization and model selection. We found that the mapping scales can induce significant changes to the spatial pattern of outputs and annual totals of water provision. In addition, differences in parameterization using differing sources from the literature also led to obvious differences in base flow. However, the impact of each uncertainty associated with differences in spatial data sources were not so great. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of uncertainty assessment and highlight that any conclusions drawn from ecosystem services mapping, such as the impacts of mining, are likely to also be a property of the uncertainty in ecosystem services mapping methods. View Full-Text
Keywords: water provision; mining region; uncertainty assessment; ecosystem service mapping; scale water provision; mining region; uncertainty assessment; ecosystem service mapping; scale
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Lechner, A.M.; Baumgartl, T. Ecosystem Services Mapping Uncertainty Assessment: A Case Study in the Fitzroy Basin Mining Region. Water 2018, 10, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010088

AMA Style

Wang Z, Lechner AM, Baumgartl T. Ecosystem Services Mapping Uncertainty Assessment: A Case Study in the Fitzroy Basin Mining Region. Water. 2018; 10(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhenyu, Alex M. Lechner, and Thomas Baumgartl. 2018. "Ecosystem Services Mapping Uncertainty Assessment: A Case Study in the Fitzroy Basin Mining Region" Water 10, no. 1: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010088

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop