Next Article in Journal
Medical Genetics in Brazil in the 21st Century: A Thriving Specialty and Its Incorporation in Public Health Policies
Previous Article in Journal
Auditory and Language Abilities in Children with Takenouchi–Kosaki Syndrome: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simulated Microgravity Alters Gene Regulation Linked to Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease

by
Candice G. T. Tahimic
1,2,*,
Sonette Steczina
2,3,
Aimy Sebastian
4,
Nicholas R. Hum
4,
Metadel Abegaz
2,3,
Masahiro Terada
2,5,
Maria Cimini
6,
David A. Goukassian
7,
Ann-Sofie Schreurs
2,5,
Tana M. Hoban-Higgins
8,
Charles A. Fuller
8,
Gabriela G. Loots
4,9,
Ruth K. Globus
2 and
Yasaman Shirazi-Fard
2
1
Department of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
2
Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
3
Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
4
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
5
Universities Space Research Association, Washington, DC 20024, USA
6
Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
7
Cardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
8
Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
9
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(8), 975; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080975
Submission received: 29 June 2024 / Revised: 18 July 2024 / Accepted: 19 July 2024 / Published: 24 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Animal Models of Human Disease 2.0)

Abstract

:
Microgravity exposure induces a cephalad fluid shift and an overall reduction in physical activity levels which can lead to cardiovascular deconditioning in the absence of countermeasures. Future spaceflight missions will expose crew to extended periods of microgravity among other stressors, the effects of which on cardiovascular health are not fully known. In this study, we determined cardiac responses to extended microgravity exposure using the rat hindlimb unloading (HU) model. We hypothesized that exposure to prolonged simulated microgravity and subsequent recovery would lead to increased oxidative damage and altered expression of genes involved in the oxidative response. To test this hypothesis, we examined hearts of male (three and nine months of age) and female (3 months of age) Long–Evans rats that underwent HU for various durations up to 90 days and reambulated up to 90 days post-HU. Results indicate sex-dependent changes in oxidative damage marker 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and antioxidant gene expression in left ventricular tissue. Three-month-old females displayed elevated 8-OHdG levels after 14 days of HU while age-matched males did not. In nine-month-old males, there were no differences in 8-OHdG levels between HU and normally loaded control males at any of the timepoints tested following HU. RNAseq analysis of left ventricular tissue from nine-month-old males after 14 days of HU revealed upregulation of pathways involved in pro-inflammatory signaling, immune cell activation and differential expression of genes associated with cardiovascular disease progression. Taken together, these findings provide a rationale for targeting antioxidant and immune pathways and that sex differences should be taken into account in the development of countermeasures to maintain cardiovascular health in space.

1. Introduction

Spaceflight leads to cardiovascular deconditioning in the absence of mitigation strategies. Cardiovascular changes in response to spaceflight are attributed to altered microgravity levels and the ensuing cephalad fluid shift [1]. Overall reductions in physical activity and other factors such as nutritional changes, elevated CO2 levels, and a demanding workload also may be contributing factors. Some of the reported cardiovascular changes caused by exposure to the spaceflight environment include reductions in left ventricular mass [2,3], transient atrial distension [4], and hypovolemia [5]. Stagnant or retrograde venous flow as well as thrombosis have been observed in crew during flight [6]. Heart rhythm disturbances postflight also have been reported [7]. Orthostatic intolerance [8] and stiffer carotid arteries [9] have also been observed in crew upon return to Earth. Crew on exploration-class missions (e.g., trip to Mars) will experience prolonged periods of microgravity and exposure to low doses of space radiation given current spacecraft shielding designs. Therefore, it is important to understand the cardiovascular responses to long-duration spaceflight to mitigate potential health risks.
The rodent hindlimb unloading (HU) model [10,11] has been used to gain insights into some aspects of human cardiovascular responses to microgravity and cephalad fluid shifts. HU for four weeks in rats resulted in decreased left ventricular mass and volume [12], consistent with findings from a number of bed rest studies [2,13,14,15,16] and from spaceflight [3]. Two weeks of HU in rats perturbs day–night blood pressure (BP) and heart rate regulation [17]. Compared to baseline (pre-HU) values, HU generally led to increased systolic and diastolic BP during both day and night cycles, whereas heart rate was increased during the day but not at night. Some of these HU findings could also have been confounded by other factors such as social isolation and restraint stress [17]. In addition, arrhythmias and aberrant intracellular Ca2+ signaling have been observed in mice that underwent HU (26–56 days) [18]. Changes in redox balance have also been reported. For example, hearts from male Sprague–Dawley rats that underwent two weeks of HU displayed increased levels of malondialdehyde, a lipid peroxidation marker [19].
Currently, there is limited information regarding the effects of long-duration spaceflight on the human cardiovascular system at time scales relevant to interplanetary missions (>2 years). In addition, the effects of age, sex, duration of exposure, and long-term recovery on cardiovascular outcomes are not well established. Hence, the goals of our study are to (1) determine the impact of sex, age, duration of exposure, and recovery on oxidative stress responses to microgravity and (2) define underlying molecular mechanisms. We hypothesized that exposure to simulated microgravity and the ensuing recovery would lead to changes in redox balance and the expression of select genes including those that play a role in oxidative stress responses. To test this hypothesis, we examined hearts from male and female rats that underwent hindlimb unloading (HU) for various durations (up to 90 days) and those that underwent reambulation after 90 days of HU. To achieve this, we assessed DNA oxidative damage markers and select transcripts, and performed RNAseq analysis of cardiac tissue.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experiment Design

Animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition. All animal experiments were conducted with prior approval from the UC Davis Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Female and male Long–Evans rats (Taconic) were selected for this study. Animals were group-housed in standard vivarium cages until the onset of HU. A group of females and males (referred to as “young”) underwent HU at three months of age, while a group of retired male breeders (referred to as “older males”) began HU at nine months of age. Normally loaded (NL) controls were individually housed in standard vivarium cages. Animals were suspended onto the pulley apparatus via orthopedic traction tape as described previously [11]. NL controls were handled the same way as the HU animals except for the actual attachment of traction tape and tail suspension. HU was conducted for either 14 days or 90 days. A subset of nine-month-old (older) males that underwent HU for 90 days were then released from the suspension apparatus to reambulate normally (Reloading, Rel) for 90 days. All animals were supplied with standard rodent laboratory chow (Purina, St. Louis, MO, USA) and water ad libitum. Enrichment consisted of Diamond Twists paper sticks (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and I-Chews (Newco, Hayward, CA, USA) and replenished as needed. Room temperature was maintained within a range of 20–26 °C with a 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle. After the designated duration of HU, animals were euthanized via isoflurane overdose followed by exsanguination and decapitation. Tissues were collected shortly thereafter. Hearts were bisected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until processing. Refer to Table S1 for the sample sizes of the experiment groups included in this study. Young male and female, 90 day HU, and recovery groups were not included in the study either due to insufficient sample sizes or unavailability of appropriately processed samples.

2.2. Processing of Frozen Heart Samples

Frozen hearts were retrieved from −80 °C storage and placed on a metal platform that was pre-chilled with liquid nitrogen. Left ventricular tissue was excised from the anterior to posterior ends (apex) of the heart. The excised left ventricular tissue was further cut into thirds (anterior, middle, and posterior). The anterior and posterior thirds were processed for DNA and RNA extraction, respectively. Samples were excluded from analyses if anatomical landmarks could not be conclusively identified for isolation of left ventricular tissue.

2.3. RNA Extraction from Cardiac Tissue

Total RNA was extracted from frozen left ventricular tissue using the RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration was determined using NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and purity was determined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Only samples showing an RNA integrity number (RIN) > 8 were used for RNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

2.4. cDNA Synthesis and qPCR

First-strand DNA was synthesized from total RNA as follows. A total of 450 ng of RNA was used for a 30 uL first strand synthesis. Briefly, 1.5 uL of random hexamers (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat# N8080127), 1.5 μL dNTPs (Qiagen, Cat# 1005631), and 12 μL of water were mixed, incubated at 65 °C for 5 min, and immediately chilled on ice. A solution-containing 3 μL RNase-free water, 6 μL 5× first strand buffer (Invitrogen, Cat# Y02321), 3 μL DTT (Invitrogen, Cat# Y00147), and 1.5 μL RNase Out (Invitrogen, Cat# 100000840) was added to the abovementioned mix and then incubated at 37 °C for 2 min. Then 1.5 μL of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (200 U/μL, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat# 28025013) was added to the resulting solution and incubated as follows: 25 °C for 10 min, 37 °C for 50 min, and 70 °C for 15 min. All incubation steps were performed using a TC-312 thermocycler (Techne, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). First-strand DNA was stored at −80 °C until use for qPCR using the Taqman system. Multiplex PCR reactions were set up to measure both genes of interest and housekeeping gene expression in the same well of a 384-well plate. A premade gene expression master mix (Taqman, LifeTechnologies, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat# 4369016) was utilized, and each reaction was completed in duplicate. FAM-labeled Taqman probes (LifeTechnologies, Waltham, MA, USA) were used for the following genes of interest: nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2 (Nfe2l2, Rn00582415_m1), superoxide dismutase 1 (Sod1, Rn00566938_m1), superoxide dismutase 2 (Sod2, Rn00690588_g1), and sirtuin 1 (Sirt1, Rn01428096_m1). VIC-labeled ribosomal protein L19 (Rpl19, Rn00821265_g1) was used as housekeeping gene. qPCR was performed on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The relative gene expression levels for HU groups relative to age- and sex-matched controls were determined by the ΔΔCt method and reported as fold change.

2.5. 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) Assay

Total DNA was extracted from frozen left ventricular tissue using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Quantification of 8-OHdG was performed using OxiSelect™ Oxidative DNA Damage ELISA Kit (Cell Biolabs Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, Cat# STA-320) following manufacturer’s specifications. Enzyme reaction/absorbance was measured using a Spectra Max 250 (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) and Softmax Pro 5 software.

2.6. RNA Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

Poly(A)+-enriched cDNA libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Library Prep kit (Illumina Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) and sequenced using Illumina NextSeq 550 (Illumina Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) instrument to generate 75 bp single-end reads. Sequencing data quality was checked using FastQC (version 0.11.5) software. Subsequently, reads were mapped to the rat reference genome (rn6) using STAR (version 2.6.0c). Then, a matrix of read counts per gene was generated using “featureCounts” from the Rsubread package (version 1.30.5). Genes with low expression values were filtered from downstream analysis by requiring more than 5 reads in at least 6 samples for each gene. Subsequently, between-sample normalization was performed using EDASeq (version 2.16.0). One sample from each group had to be excluded from analysis due to technical issues. Hence, 6 samples per group were used for the succeeding analysis. RUVseq (version 1.16.0) [RUVs with k = 4] was used to estimate the factors of unwanted variation. Genes differentially expressed between HU and control samples were identified using DESeq2 (version 1.22.2), controlling for factors of unwanted variation. Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed and heat maps generated using Morpheus, with Pearson method selected [20]. RStudio analysis software (Version 1.1.419), together with ggplot2 (version 3.1.1), ggrepel (version 0.8.0), and Bioconductor (DESeq2 version 1.22.2) packages, were used to obtain principal component analysis plots. For gene enrichment analysis, differentially expressed genes meeting a log2 fold change cut-off of >0.3 or <−0.3 and an adjusted p-value < 0.05 were input into Toppfun [21,22]. Toppfun was used to assess functional enrichment of DEGs based on ontologies, gene family, phenotype (human disease), and pharmacome (drug–gene associations). Of the 125 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), 121 matched the contents of the Toppfun database and were therefore included in the list for gene enrichment analysis. The DEGs that had no match in the Toppfun database were Clec4a1, Lilrb3l, Fcna, and Mill1. Gene enrichment analysis was performed at a false discovery rate (FDR, Benjamini Hochberg) of <0.05 and a gene limit of 2 or greater. GO Terms were plotted for visualization using the matplotlib.pyplot, seaborn, and pandas packages run in Google Colaboratory (Python ver 3.10).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Equivalence of variance was first evaluated by Levene’s test. Once equal variance was confirmed, a t-test was performed to compare HU and matched control groups. This study involved an extended sampling period (3 years). To minimize batch effects, we compared HU and the matched controls for any given sex and timepoint since these groups were collected within the same period. Specifically, any HU group and its normally loaded control group (e.g., young male 14 day HU and NL groups) were euthanized on the same day or a day apart. Comparisons were not made across timepoints, sexes, or ages. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP software version 13.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Data shown are mean +/− S.D.

3. Results

In this study, we made use of the rodent HU model to gain insight on the effects of microgravity exposure on molecular signatures of the heart. With the exception of the 14-day HU young females, all HU groups had lower body weights versus age- and sex-matched controls (Figure 1), consistent with previous reports [23,24,25]. Weight loss in HU groups of older males was transient, with body weights of NL and HU groups being comparable after 90 days of reambulation. Due to the modest decrease in body weight (10–13%), we do not expect weight loss to be a major confounding factor in other experimental outcomes.
To determine whether simulated microgravity leads to alterations in redox balance in cardiac tissue, we measured levels of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in left ventricular tissue (Figure 2). 8-OHdG is a marker for oxidative damage to DNA. Young females after 14 days of HU displayed a modest yet statistically significant increase in 8-OHdG levels (33.2%) compared to age- and sex-matched controls. At 14 days of HU, no differences were observed between HU and control groups in young and older males. Older males at 90 days of HU did not exhibit any significant difference in 8-OHdG levels versus corresponding controls. We further hypothesized that reloading will lead to increased oxidative damage to hearts due to altered fluid distribution and increased functional demand on the heart. Hence, we examined 8-OHdG levels at an earlier timepoint of reambulation (7 days) where we found no differences in 8-OHdG levels in older males that underwent normal reambulation after 90 days of HU relative to controls.
To further assess any changes in key molecular determinants of redox balance, we measured gene expression levels of select antioxidant genes (Sod1 and Sod2) as well as a master transcriptional regulator of the antioxidant response, Nfe2l2 (Figure 3A–C). In addition, we examined the gene expression of Sirt1, a marker of cellular senescence and oxidative stress also known to impact longevity [26,27] (Figure 3D). Compared to sex- and age-matched controls, young females that underwent 14 days of HU did not show any changes in gene expression for any of the four genes tested. Young males at the same timepoint showed a modest downregulation of Nfe2l2 (Figure 3A) as well as upregulation of Sod1 and Sod2 (Figure 3B and 3C respectively), but no change in Sirt1 expression (Figure 3D). In older males, Nfe2l2 was downregulated at 14 days of HU, while there were no changes in Sod1, Sod2, or Sirt1 expression. The downregulation of Nfe2l2 expression in older males persisted at 90 days of HU. After a 90-day reambulation period, this pattern was reversed, with HU groups showing upregulated expression of Nfe2l2 and Sirt1 relative to controls.
We reasoned that identifying the molecular signature of the early adaptation of cardiac tissue to HU will allow us to link early changes in gene expression and biological pathways to later cardiac outcomes. We therefore conducted transcriptomic analysis (RNAseq) of tissue from the left ventricle in older (nine-month-old) males and their corresponding controls. We selected nine-month-old males for analysis (samples were not available for females of similar age) over the other three-month-old groups. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering generally indicated clustering by treatment group (Figure 4 and Figure 5 respectively). A total of 125 genes were differentially expressed in the HU group relative to controls. Of these, 48 were upregulated and 77 were downregulated (Table 1). The top 10 upregulated and downregulated genes included a number of immune-related genes such as Tlr8 and the macrophage/monocyte markers CD68 and CD163 as well as two circadian clock-related genes, Per3 and Arntl (Figure 6). Fifteen of these DEG’s were cluster-of-differentiation (CD) molecules belonging to the C-type lectin domain family, while 6 were LY6/PLAUR domain-containing members of the complement gene family (Table 2). Nfe2l2 did not appear as a downregulated gene in the 14D HU hearts of older males based on RNAseq despite the observed decrease (although modest) in transcript levels by qPCR analysis (Figure 3A, Table 1). This is likely due to differences in the normalization methods for the two assays.
Gene enrichment analysis of DEGs that met the FDR threshold revealed a predominance of immune-related processes including macrophage activation and complement activation. Further, circadian signaling, vesicle-mediated transport, and redox signaling were differentially enriched (Figure 7; refer to Table S2 for full list). Gene enrichment analysis for disease phenotypes using Toppfun [21,22] also revealed enrichment of a subset of DEGs linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD), immune dysfunction, neurovascular disease, cancer, metabolic disease, and sleep disorders. Cardiovascular pathologies represented include hypertensive disease, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Immune disorders include complement deficiency and the autoimmune disease lupus erythematosus (Table 3; refer to Table S3 for full list). Consistent with the human disease phenotype findings, 24 DEGs were associated with the anti-bradycardia drug isoproterenol, a non-selective β adrenergic receptor agonist. In addition, a number of DEGs were associated with anti-hypertensive drugs losartan and valsartan, both angiotensin receptor blockers. A subset of DEGs also were associated with simvastatin (anticholesterolemic), doxorubicin (cancer treatment), rosiglitazone (antidiabetic), and melatonin (sleeping aid) (Table 4; refer to Table S4 for full list).

4. Discussion

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of simulated microgravity on redox signaling in the heart and the overall transcriptomic landscape. Our findings from a rat hindlimb unloading (HU) model for cephalad fluid shift and microgravity exposure suggest sex and age differences in oxidative stress responses. Young males displayed upregulation in the expression of the antioxidants Sod1 and Sod2, and a decrease in Nfe2l2 expression, with no changes in 8-OHdG levels. On the other hand, increased levels of the DNA oxidative marker 8-OHdG was observed in females that underwent 14 days of HU with no changes in the expression levels of the redox signaling-related genes examined. One interpretation of our findings is that during short-term HU, young males mitigate oxidative damage more effectively than young females. Alternatively, it is possible that the kinetics of the emergence and repair of oxidative damage are sexually dimorphic. It is also unclear whether sex differences in oxidative stress responses persist due to unavailability of samples at later timepoints. Further, short-term HU in older males does not appear to enhance oxidative damage. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward increased 8-OHdG in the older males that underwent 90 days of HU compared to controls. We cannot rule out the possibility that long-duration HU can increase oxidative damage in the hearts of older males due to the small sample size available to perform the 8-OHdG assay in these groups. At 14 days of HU, older males exhibited a downregulation of Nfe2l2 expression, while 8-OHdG levels were not different between HU and controls. The persistent downregulation of Nfe2l2 at this timepoint is consistent with the observed trend towards increased oxidative damage during prolonged HU. A 90 day reambulation period after prolonged HU of 90 days led to upregulated Nfe2l2 and Sirt1 expression. It is possible that upregulation of Nfe2l2 and Sirt1 may be one of the underlying mechanisms by which the heart can recover from extended durations of HU. We recognize the extended time period for the conduct of the HU experiments and varying sample sizes across groups as limitations of our study. Specifically, the interpretation of the results from the 8-OHdG and qPCR assays which were performed on multiple HU groups and their corresponding NL controls merits further study. Consistent with our findings, another group has reported that HU elicits an antioxidant response. In the hearts of 6-month-old mice, HU led to time-dependent increases in the oxidation of glutathione to glutathione disulfide, an indicator of oxidative damage [28]. Taken together, our findings and those of others support the use of antioxidant-based countermeasures for extended duration spaceflight.
RNAseq results indicate that 14 days of HU in older males leads to enrichment of processes involved in the immune response, including complement activation and inflammation (Figure 7, Table S2). Complement activation, a component of innate immunity, is a mechanism by which the host defends against microbial infections. Studies in the last decade have revealed a role for the complement system in recognizing damaged host cells and coordinating with other elements of the immune response to achieve resolution to injury [29,30,31]. Dysregulated complement responses have been linked to autoimmune disease [32] as well as poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease [33,34,35] and related animal models [36,37]. Our results indicate upregulation of several complement genes. These include C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc, all components of the membrane attack complex, as well as C5ar1, the receptor for the complement anaphylatoxin 5a, which can stimulate immune cells in myocardial infarct models [29,36,37] (Table 1). The implication of upregulated complement response in cardiac tissue during simulated microgravity requires further study given the emerging role of the complement pathway in the development of cardiovascular disease [37,38]. Interestingly, in International Space Station (ISS) crew, elements of the complement response were found to be modestly increased within a week of return to Earth relative to pre-flight values [39]. However, the impact of actual flight on complement responses could not be evaluated, since no in-flight measures were reported in the said study.
The underlying bases for the observed upregulation of complement genes in HU hearts is unclear. In Earth-based cardiovascular disease, altered fluid distribution and pressure changes can give rise to injury of cardiac tissue and therefore may play a role in the upregulated complement response seen in this rodent model for microgravity-induced fluid shifts. Complement activation also can occur as a response to pathogens or their constituents. Hence, another possibility that requires further study is the role of gut permeability in promoting a complement response during simulated microgravity. HU has been reported to alter the gut microbiome, cause damage to intestinal villi, and compromise the structural integrity of tight junctions [40], which can lead to gut leakiness. Indeed, HU can cause a transient release of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in circulation and changes in the distribution of neutrophils and lymphocytes, [41] as well as an increase in circulating levels of the potent pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon γ (IFNγ) [42]. Further, synthetic bacterial DNA has been shown to induce a robust inflammatory response in the heart of mice [43]. Consistent with a potential role of gut permeability, we found upregulation of CD14 in 14-day HU hearts. CD14 is a surface receptor expressed in circulating monocytes/macrophages, which binds to LPS to induce an immune response [44]. Other key genes involved in the inflammatory response were also upregulated after 14 days of HU, including CD163 and CD68. CD163 is a marker for activated macrophages. CD163+ macrophages promote angiogenesis, vessel permeability, and leukocyte infiltration [45] and are increased in hearts of simian immunodeficiency virus-infected monkeys [46]. Further, CD68 marks the monocyte/macrophage population. Both expression levels of CD68 and immunopositive cell counts increase in the hearts of mice exposed to spaceflight-relevant doses (<0.5 Gy) of radiation [47]. In addition, HU in mice increased hippocampal CD68 levels, which mark activated microglial populations [48,49]. Collectively, the upregulation of CD14, CD68, and CD163 expression would be consistent with macrophage infiltration in HU hearts. Humans in future deep space missions will experience extended periods of low-dose space radiation and microgravity. Hence, the impact of the predicted upregulation of macrophage activity on human cardiovascular health requires further study. Tlr8 also was upregulated in the hearts of 14-day HU animals. Accumulating evidence demonstrates the important role of TLR signaling in the development of cardiovascular disease [50,51], whereas Tlr8 transcripts increased in patients with enterovirus-induced dilated cardiomyopathy [52].
RNAseq results also suggest that HU in older males can perturb cardiac circadian clock signals. The circadian clock gene, Arntl (Bmal1), was the fourth most downregulated gene in the HU group, while Per3 was the most upregulated gene. Other circadian clock-related genes such as Per2 and Clock were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. There is a growing appreciation for the role of clock genes in cardiovascular disease. Cardiac-specific deletion of Arntl leads to congestive heart failure during aging, upregulation of oxidative stress-responsive genes in hearts and altered energy metabolism [53]. In addition, Per2 gene ablation worsens the inflammatory response to myocardial ischemia [54]. ISS crew experience circadian misalignment which leads to sleep–wake cycle disruption [55]. Bioinformatic analysis of tissues from rodent spaceflight and ground-based studies (e.g., skeletal muscle, adrenals, kidney, liver) consistently show that spaceflight and its analogs lead to altered expression of circadian clock-related genes including Per2, Arntl, and Clock [56]. Taken together, our findings and those of others show the importance of exploring the role of circadian clock signaling in spaceflight-induced tissue deficits.
RNAseq also revealed the enrichment of processes related to redox signaling, such as superoxide anion generation. Furthermore, 14 days of HU led to differential expression of a number of genes known to play a role in the defense against oxidative damage. In the current study, Clusterin (Clu), also known as Apolipoprotein J (ApoJ), was upregulated after 14 days of HU. Overexpression of Clu in rat ventricular cells has been reported to rescue angiotensin II-induced ROS production and apoptosis [57]. Ucp3, a member of the family of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (UCPs), was downregulated at 14 days of HU. UCPs have a number of functions, such as dissipating the proton gradient in the mitochondria, which reduces ATP production, releasing energy as heat, and also play a role in the regulation of redox balance [58]. Compared to wild-type controls, the hearts of Ucp3 knockout mice maintained in thermoneutral conditions have reduced mitochondrial complex activities as well as increased levels of ROS and oxidative stress markers [59]. Thus, the downregulation of Ucp3 in the hearts of HU rats suggests that simulated microgravity alters redox signaling and energetic processes in the mitochondria, consistent with findings from spaceflight and analog studies of other tissues [60,61]. Regulator of Calcineurin 1 (Rcan1), which is downregulated in hearts after 14 days of HU, plays a role in NFAT/Calcineurin signaling and is implicated in CVD progression [62,63]. Deletion of Rcan1 exacerbates the effects of septic cardiomyopathy and increases cardiac mitochondrial injury, as shown by elevated ROS levels and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential [62]. Taken together, our findings are in support of the hypothesis that simulated microgravity leads to altered redox signaling and function in the heart. In addition, these results are consistent with our earlier findings that hearts of mice that have been in space for 15 days show altered expression of genes regulating redox balance [64]. Taken together, the overall transcriptomic signature in the left ventricle of older males at 14 days of HU (~1 human year) suggests activation of the immune system and pro-inflammatory signaling, altered expression of circadian clock genes, and induction of signals that promote ROS production together with upregulation of select cellular defenses to oxidative damage. Therefore, our model predicts that in the absence of any mitigation strategies, extended spaceflight (>a year) may upregulate pro-inflammatory signaling in cardiac tissue. Consistent with our hypothesis, simulated microgravity led to enhanced expression of genes involved in the inflammatory and oxidative stress responses. Therefore, mitigating excessive inflammation and ensuring optimum antioxidant defenses (e.g., via dietary supplementation) may be a useful approach to ensure long-term cardiac health in astronauts during deep space missions. The upregulation of complement activation genes in hearts of rodents exposed to HU needs further study to determine its underlying basis and long-term consequences for cardiac health. In addition, we have identified the molecular signature of cardiac tissue responses to HU. A subset of these differentially expressed genes could be tested as candidate circulating biomarkers for monitoring the trajectory of an astronaut’s response to spaceflight or predicting the need for medical intervention.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15080975/s1, Table S1: List of groups and sample sizes included in analyses, Table S2: Results of functional enrichment analysis using Toppfun, Table S3: Results of human disease phenotype analysis using Toppfun, Table S4: Results of drug-gene association analysis using Toppfun.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S., R.K.G. and C.G.T.T.; methodology, C.G.T.T., A. Sebastian, G.G.L., D.A.G., M.T., N.R.H., M.A. and M.C.; formal analysis, C.G.T.T., A. Sebastian, M.T., S.S., N.R.H., M.A. and M.C.; resources, R.K.G., G.G.L., D.A.G. and C.A.F.; visualization, C.G.T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G.T.T.; writing—review and editing, all authors; project administration, T.M.H.-H.; supervision, C.G.T.T., R.K.G., A. Schreurs and T.M.H.-H.; funding acquisition, R.K.G., Y.S., A. Schreurs and C.A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the NASA Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures (HRP HHC) NNJ14ZSA001N-FLAGSHIP and NNJ13ZSA002N-FLAGSHIP (both to R.K.G.) and NNX13AD94G to C.A.F. A. Schreurs and M.T. were supported by fellowships from the NASA Space Biology Postdoctoral Program (NPP). Work by G.G.L., N.R.H., and A. Sebastian were performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol (Protocol 17390) was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California at Davis on 24 January 2013 and renewed annually for the duration of the project.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to April Ronca and other members of Ames SC Division for coordinating this NASA-funded tissue-sharing opportunity. We also thank Sungshin Choi and other members of the NASA Ames and UC Davis dissection teams for assistance in collecting rat tissue samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Norsk, P.; Asmar, A.; Damgaard, M.; Christensen, N.J. Fluid shifts, vasodilatation and ambulatory blood pressure reduction during long duration spaceflight. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perhonen, M.A.; Franco, F.; Lane, L.D.; Buckey, J.C.; Blomqvist, C.G.; Zerwekh, J.E.; Peshock, R.M.; Weatherall, P.T.; Levine, B.D. Cardiac atrophy after bed rest and spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 91, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Summers, R.L.; Martin, D.S.; Meck, J.V.; Coleman, T.G. Mechanism of spaceflight-induced changes in left ventricular mass. Am. J. Cardiol. 2005, 95, 1128–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khine, H.W.; Steding-Ehrenborg, K.; Hastings, J.L.; Kowal, J.; Daniels, J.D.; Page, R.L.; Goldberger, J.J.; Ng, J.; Adams-Huet, B.; Bungo, M.W.; et al. Effects of Prolonged Spaceflight on Atrial Size, Atrial Electrophysiology, and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2018, 11, e005959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Watenpaugh, D.E. Fluid volume control during short-term space flight and implications for human performance. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204, 3209–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marshall-Goebel, K.; Laurie, S.S.; Alferova, I.V.; Arbeille, P.; Aunon-Chancellor, S.M.; Ebert, D.J.; Lee, S.M.C.; Macias, B.R.; Martin, D.S.; Pattarini, J.M.; et al. Assessment of Jugular Venous Blood Flow Stasis and Thrombosis During Spaceflight. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e1915011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Migeotte, P.F.; Prisk, G.K.; Paiva, M. Microgravity alters respiratory sinus arrhythmia and short-term heart rate variability in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 284, H1995–H2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, S.M.C.; Feiveson, A.H.; Stein, S.; Stenger, M.B.; Platts, S.H. Orthostatic Intolerance After ISS and Space Shuttle Missions. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 2015, 86, A54–A67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hughson, R.L.; Robertson, A.D.; Arbeille, P.; Shoemaker, J.K.; Rush, J.W.; Fraser, K.S.; Greaves, D.K. Increased postflight carotid artery stiffness and inflight insulin resistance resulting from 6-mo spaceflight in male and female astronauts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016, 310, H628–H638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Globus, R.K.; Morey-Holton, E. Hindlimb unloading: Rodent analog for microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016, 120, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morey-Holton, E.R.; Globus, R.K. Hindlimb unloading rodent model: Technical aspects. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bao, J.X.; Zhang, L.F.; Shang, H.H.; Yu, Z.B.; Qian, Y.Q. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function after simulated weightlessness in rats. Space Med. Med. Eng. (Beijing) 1999, 12, 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levine, B.D.; Zuckerman, J.H.; Pawelczyk, J.A. Cardiac atrophy after bed-rest deconditioning: A nonneural mechanism for orthostatic intolerance. Circulation 1997, 96, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dorfman, T.A.; Levine, B.D.; Tillery, T.; Peshock, R.M.; Hastings, J.L.; Schneider, S.M.; Macias, B.R.; Biolo, G.; Hargens, A.R. Cardiac atrophy in women following bed rest. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 103, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Westby, C.M.; Martin, D.S.; Lee, S.M.; Stenger, M.B.; Platts, S.H. Left ventricular remodeling during and after 60 days of sedentary head-down bed rest. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016, 120, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shibata, S.; Perhonen, M.; Levine, B.D. Supine cycling plus volume loading prevent cardiovascular deconditioning during bed rest. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 108, 1177–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tsvirkun, D.; Bourreau, J.; Mieuset, A.; Garo, F.; Vinogradova, O.; Larina, I.; Navasiolava, N.; Gauquelin-Koch, G.; Gharib, C.; Custaud, M.A. Contribution of social isolation, restraint, and hindlimb unloading to changes in hemodynamic parameters and motion activity in rats. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Respress, J.L.; Gershovich, P.M.; Wang, T.; Reynolds, J.O.; Skapura, D.G.; Sutton, J.P.; Miyake, C.Y.; Wehrens, X.H. Long-term simulated microgravity causes cardiac RyR2 phosphorylation and arrhythmias in mice. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 176, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chowdhury, P.; Soulsby, M.E.; Scott, J.L. Effects of aminoguanidine on tissue oxidative stress induced by hindlimb unloading in rats. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2009, 39, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  20. Morpheus. Available online: https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/ (accessed on 13 April 2019).
  21. Chen, J.; Aronow, B.J.; Jegga, A.G. Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Bardes, E.E.; Aronow, B.J.; Jegga, A.G. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W305–W311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ulanova, A.; Gritsyna, Y.; Salmov, N.; Lomonosova, Y.; Belova, S.; Nemirovskaya, T.; Shenkman, B.; Vikhlyantsev, I. Effect of L-Arginine on Titin Expression in Rat Soleus Muscle After Hindlimb Unloading. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marzuca-Nassr, G.N.; Fortes, M.A.S.; Guimaraes-Ferreira, L.; Murata, G.M.; Vitzel, K.F.; Vasconcelos, D.A.A.; Bassit, R.A.; Curi, R. Short-term creatine supplementation changes protein metabolism signaling in hindlimb suspension. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, e8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dehority, W.; Halloran, B.P.; Bikle, D.D.; Curren, T.; Kostenuik, P.J.; Wronski, T.J.; Shen, Y.; Rabkin, B.; Bouraoui, A.; Morey-Holton, E. Bone and hormonal changes induced by skeletal unloading in the mature male rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, E62–E69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. North, B.J.; Rosenberg, M.A.; Jeganathan, K.B.; Hafner, A.V.; Michan, S.; Dai, J.; Baker, D.J.; Cen, Y.; Wu, L.E.; Sauve, A.A.; et al. SIRT2 induces the checkpoint kinase BubR1 to increase lifespan. EMBO J. 2014, 33, 1438–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, F.; Nguyen, M.; Qin, F.X.; Tong, Q. SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO3a in response to oxidative stress and caloric restriction. Aging Cell 2007, 6, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seawright, J.W.; Samman, Y.; Sridharan, V.; Mao, X.W.; Cao, M.; Singh, P.; Melnyk, S.; Koturbash, I.; Nelson, G.A.; Hauer-Jensen, M.; et al. Effects of low-dose rate gamma-irradiation combined with simulated microgravity on markers of oxidative stress, DNA methylation potential, and remodeling in the mouse heart. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ricklin, D.; Lambris, J.D. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: Pathophysiological mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3831–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bjerre, M.; Hansen, T.K.; Flyvbjerg, A. Complement activation and cardiovascular disease. Horm. Metab. Res. 2008, 40, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pavlov, V.I.; Skjoedt, M.O.; Siow Tan, Y.; Rosbjerg, A.; Garred, P.; Stahl, G.L. Endogenous and natural complement inhibitor attenuates myocardial injury and arterial thrombogenesis. Circulation 2012, 126, 2227–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sekine, H.; Kinser, T.T.; Qiao, F.; Martinez, E.; Paulling, E.; Ruiz, P.; Gilkeson, G.S.; Tomlinson, S. The benefit of targeted and selective inhibition of the alternative complement pathway for modulating autoimmunity and renal disease in MRL/lpr mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 1076–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, D.; Qi, X.; Li, Q.; Jia, W.; Wei, L.; Huang, A.; Liu, K.; Li, Z. Increased complements and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predict heart failure in acute myocardial infarction. Biomed. Rep. 2016, 5, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, W.; Cai, D. Complement components sC5b-9 and CH50 predict prognosis in heart failure patients combined with hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 2019, 33, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mueller, K.A.L.; Patzelt, J.; Sauter, M.; Maier, P.; Gekeler, S.; Klingel, K.; Kandolf, R.; Seizer, P.; Gawaz, M.; Geisler, T.; et al. Myocardial expression of the anaphylatoxin receptor C3aR is associated with cardiac inflammation and prognosis in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2018, 5, 846–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. De Hoog, V.C.; Timmers, L.; Van Duijvenvoorde, A.; De Jager, S.C.; Van Middelaar, B.J.; Smeets, M.B.; Woodruff, T.M.; Doevendans, P.A.; Pasterkamp, G.; Hack, C.E.; et al. Leucocyte expression of complement C5a receptors exacerbates infarct size after myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014, 103, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mueller, M.; Herzog, C.; Larmann, J.; Schmitz, M.; Hilfiker-Kleiner, D.; Gessner, J.E.; Theilmeier, G. The receptor for activated complement factor 5 (C5aR) conveys myocardial ischemic damage by mediating neutrophil transmigration. Immunobiology 2013, 218, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jenei, Z.M.; Zima, E.; Csuka, D.; Munthe-Fog, L.; Hein, E.; Szeplaki, G.; Becker, D.; Karadi, I.; Prohaszka, Z.; Garred, P.; et al. Complement activation and its prognostic role in post-cardiac arrest patients. Scand. J. Immunol. 2014, 79, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kashirina, D.N.; Percy, A.J.; Pastushkova, L.K.; Borchers, C.H.; Kireev, K.S.; Ivanisenko, V.A.; Kononikhin, A.S.; Nikolaev, E.N.; Larina, I.M. The molecular mechanisms driving physiological changes after long duration space flights revealed by quantitative analysis of human blood proteins. BMC Med. Genom. 2019, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, P.; Shi, J.; Zhang, P.; Wang, K.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, X.; Hao, J.; Sun, X.; et al. Simulated microgravity disrupts intestinal homeostasis and increases colitis susceptibility. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 3263–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, Y.; Ni, H.; Li, M.; Sanzari, J.K.; Diffenderfer, E.S.; Lin, L.; Kennedy, A.R.; Weissman, D. Effect of solar particle event radiation and hindlimb suspension on gastrointestinal tract bacterial translocation and immune activation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jin, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, K.; Xu, C.; Shao, D.; Huang, Q.; Shi, J.; Yang, H. Responses of Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Functions of Rats to Simulated Weightlessness. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Knuefermann, P.; Schwederski, M.; Velten, M.; Krings, P.; Ehrentraut, H.; Rudiger, M.; Boehm, O.; Fink, K.; Dreiner, U.; Grohe, C.; et al. Bacterial DNA induces myocardial inflammation and reduces cardiomyocyte contractility: Role of toll-like receptor 9. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 78, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wright, S.D.; Ramos, R.A.; Tobias, P.S.; Ulevitch, R.J.; Mathison, J.C. CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 1990, 249, 1431–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guo, L.; Akahori, H.; Harari, E.; Smith, S.L.; Polavarapu, R.; Karmali, V.; Otsuka, F.; Gannon, R.L.; Braumann, R.E.; Dickinson, M.H.; et al. CD163+ macrophages promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability accompanied by inflammation in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 1106–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Walker, J.A.; Sulciner, M.L.; Nowicki, K.D.; Miller, A.D.; Burdo, T.H.; Williams, K.C. Elevated numbers of CD163+ macrophages in hearts of simian immunodeficiency virus-infected monkeys correlate with cardiac pathology and fibrosis. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2014, 30, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Seawright, J.W.; Sridharan, V.; Landes, R.D.; Cao, M.; Singh, P.; Koturbash, I.; Mao, X.W.; Miousse, I.R.; Singh, S.P.; Nelson, G.A.; et al. Effects of low-dose oxygen ions and protons on cardiac function and structure in male C57BL/6J mice. Life Sci. Space Res. 2019, 20, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rubinstein, L.; Kiffer, F.; Puukila, S.; Lowe, M.G.; Goo, B.; Luthens, A.; Schreurs, A.S.; Torres, S.M.; Steczina, S.; Tahimic, C.G.T.; et al. Mitochondria-Targeted Human Catalase in the Mouse Longevity MCAT Model Mitigates Head-Tilt Bedrest-Induced Neuro-Inflammation in the Hippocampus. Life 2022, 12, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. An, R.; Blackwell, V.K.; Harandi, B.; Gibbons, A.C.; Siu, O.; Irby, I.; Rees, A.; Cornejal, N.; Sattler, K.M.; Sheng, T.; et al. Influence of the spaceflight environment on macrophage lineages. NPJ Microgravity 2024, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, L.; Feng, Z. The Role of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in the Progression of Heart Failure. Mediators Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 9874109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Parizadeh, S.M.; Ghandehari, M.; Heydari-Majd, M.; Seifi, S.; Mardani, R.; Parizadeh, S.M.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Ferns, G.A.; Hassanian, S.M.; Avan, A. Toll-like Receptors Signaling Pathways as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 1887–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Satoh, M.; Akatsu, T.; Ishikawa, Y.; Minami, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Nakamura, M. Association between toll-like receptor 8 expression and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with enterovirus-associated dilated cardiomyopathy. Am. Heart J. 2007, 154, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kohsaka, A.; Das, P.; Hashimoto, I.; Nakao, T.; Deguchi, Y.; Gouraud, S.S.; Waki, H.; Muragaki, Y.; Maeda, M. The circadian clock maintains cardiac function by regulating mitochondrial metabolism in mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bonney, S.; Kominsky, D.; Brodsky, K.; Eltzschig, H.; Walker, L.; Eckle, T. Cardiac Per2 functions as novel link between fatty acid metabolism and myocardial inflammation during ischemia and reperfusion injury of the heart. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Flynn-Evans, E.E.; Barger, L.K.; Kubey, A.A.; Sullivan, J.P.; Czeisler, C.A. Circadian misalignment affects sleep and medication use before and during spaceflight. NPJ Microgravity 2016, 2, 15019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fujita, S.I.; Rutter, L.; Ong, Q.; Muratani, M. Integrated RNA-seq Analysis Indicates Asynchrony in Clock Genes between Tissues under Spaceflight. Life 2020, 10, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, Y.; Kong, L.; Nan, K.; Qi, S.; Ru, L.; Ding, C.; Wang, D. Apolipoprotein-J prevents angiotensin II-induced apoptosis in neonatal rat ventricular cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hirschenson, J.; Melgar-Bermudez, E.; Mailloux, R.J. The Uncoupling Proteins: A Systematic Review on the Mechanism Used in the Prevention of Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Napolitano, G.; Fasciolo, G.; Magnacca, N.; Goglia, F.; Lombardi, A.; Venditti, P. Oxidative damage and mitochondrial functionality in hearts from KO UCP3 mice housed at thermoneutrality. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 78, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. da Silveira, W.A.; Fazelinia, H.; Rosenthal, S.B.; Laiakis, E.C.; Kim, M.S.; Meydan, C.; Kidane, Y.; Rathi, K.S.; Smith, S.M.; Stear, B.; et al. Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Mitochondrial Stress as a Central Biological Hub for Spaceflight Impact. Cell 2020, 183, 1185–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Indo, H.P.; Majima, H.J.; Terada, M.; Suenaga, S.; Tomita, K.; Yamada, S.; Higashibata, A.; Ishioka, N.; Kanekura, T.; Nonaka, I.; et al. Changes in mitochondrial homeostasis and redox status in astronauts following long stays in space. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhuang, J.; Chen, L.; Li, G.; Xia, L.; Wu, S.; Leng, J.; Tao, X.; Hong, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. RCAN1 deficiency aggravates sepsis-induced cardiac remodeling and dysfunction by accelerating mitochondrial pathological fission. Inflamm. Res. 2022, 71, 1589–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, K.; Zhu, J.; Wu, Y. RCAN1 in cardiovascular diseases: Molecular mechanisms and a potential therapeutic target. Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kumar, A.; Tahimic, C.G.T.; Almeida, E.A.C.; Globus, R.K. Spaceflight Modulates the Expression of Key Oxidative Stress and Cell Cycle Related Genes in Heart. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Body weights of animals included in this study. NL: normally loaded; HU: hindlimb unloading; Rel: reambulated (reloading). The HU group was compared to their age- and sex-matched NL controls by Student’s t-test. Sample sizes: N = 5–8/group for all groups except for 90D older males, where N = 3. Values depicted are means and standard deviation. * Significant at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Figure 1. Body weights of animals included in this study. NL: normally loaded; HU: hindlimb unloading; Rel: reambulated (reloading). The HU group was compared to their age- and sex-matched NL controls by Student’s t-test. Sample sizes: N = 5–8/group for all groups except for 90D older males, where N = 3. Values depicted are means and standard deviation. * Significant at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Genes 15 00975 g001
Figure 2. 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels in left ventricular tissue as measured by ELISA. NL: normally loaded control, HU: hindlimb unloading, 7D Rel: 90D HU + 7D reloading and normally loaded control (NL). The HU groups were compared to their age- and sex-matched NL controls by Student’s t-test. Sample sizes: N = 5–8/group for all groups except for 90D older males, where N = 3. Values depicted are means and standard deviation. * Significant at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Figure 2. 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels in left ventricular tissue as measured by ELISA. NL: normally loaded control, HU: hindlimb unloading, 7D Rel: 90D HU + 7D reloading and normally loaded control (NL). The HU groups were compared to their age- and sex-matched NL controls by Student’s t-test. Sample sizes: N = 5–8/group for all groups except for 90D older males, where N = 3. Values depicted are means and standard deviation. * Significant at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Genes 15 00975 g002
Figure 3. Transcript levels of (A) Nfe2l2, (B) Sod1, (C) Sod2, and (D) Sirt1 in left ventricular wall as measured by qPCR. Values depicted are mean fold changes relative to young male control at 14 days of treatment as determined by the ΔΔCt method. Errors bars show upper and lower ranges. NL: normally loaded control, HU: hindlimb unloading, 90D Rel: 90D HU + 90D reloading and NL control. Sample sizes: N = 3–7/group. * Significant at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test by comparing HU with age- and sex-matched NL control.
Figure 3. Transcript levels of (A) Nfe2l2, (B) Sod1, (C) Sod2, and (D) Sirt1 in left ventricular wall as measured by qPCR. Values depicted are mean fold changes relative to young male control at 14 days of treatment as determined by the ΔΔCt method. Errors bars show upper and lower ranges. NL: normally loaded control, HU: hindlimb unloading, 90D Rel: 90D HU + 90D reloading and NL control. Sample sizes: N = 3–7/group. * Significant at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test by comparing HU with age- and sex-matched NL control.
Genes 15 00975 g003
Figure 4. PCA plot of transcriptomic data from older males that underwent 14 days of HU (gray triangles) and corresponding NL controls (black circles). Animal ID is indicated by the letter “R” succeeded by numbers.
Figure 4. PCA plot of transcriptomic data from older males that underwent 14 days of HU (gray triangles) and corresponding NL controls (black circles). Animal ID is indicated by the letter “R” succeeded by numbers.
Genes 15 00975 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap showing normalized counts of differentially expressed genes from older male 14D NL and HU groups. Each cell corresponds to a gene. Red: Upregulated in 14D HU relative to NL group. Blue: Downregulated in 14D HU relative to NL group. Magnitude of upregulation or downregulation is proportional to the intensity of red or blue. Deepest red: most upregulated; deepest blue: most downregulated.
Figure 5. Heatmap showing normalized counts of differentially expressed genes from older male 14D NL and HU groups. Each cell corresponds to a gene. Red: Upregulated in 14D HU relative to NL group. Blue: Downregulated in 14D HU relative to NL group. Magnitude of upregulation or downregulation is proportional to the intensity of red or blue. Deepest red: most upregulated; deepest blue: most downregulated.
Genes 15 00975 g005
Figure 6. Top 10 upregulated and downregulated genes in older male 14D HU relative to NL groups. Log2 FC: Log2 fold change. Refer to Table 1 for full list of DEGs.
Figure 6. Top 10 upregulated and downregulated genes in older male 14D HU relative to NL groups. Log2 FC: Log2 fold change. Refer to Table 1 for full list of DEGs.
Genes 15 00975 g006
Figure 7. Select enriched gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes in older male 14D HU group relative to NL group. Gene count refers to the number of DEGs that matched the GO term. The vertical bar represents the color scale of the FDR with black representing the lowest FDR. Refer to Table S2 for the full list of GO terms.
Figure 7. Select enriched gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes in older male 14D HU group relative to NL group. Gene count refers to the number of DEGs that matched the GO term. The vertical bar represents the color scale of the FDR with black representing the lowest FDR. Refer to Table S2 for the full list of GO terms.
Genes 15 00975 g007
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in older male 14D HU group relative to age- and sex- matched NL control group. DEGs were selected using an adj p-value < 0.05 at a log2 fold change cut-off > 0.3 or <−0.3. Total DEGs: 125 (48 upregulated and 77 downregulated).
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in older male 14D HU group relative to age- and sex- matched NL control group. DEGs were selected using an adj p-value < 0.05 at a log2 fold change cut-off > 0.3 or <−0.3. Total DEGs: 125 (48 upregulated and 77 downregulated).
DEGsLog2 FCp adjGene Name
Actg2−2.150.0241Actin, γ 2, smooth muscle, enteric
Adhfe1−0.530.0003Alcohol dehydrogenase, iron-containing, 1
Alox5ap0.580.0454Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase activating protein
Aplnr−0.410.0457Apelin receptor
Aqp7−0.770.0007Aquaporin 7
Arl110.790.0357ADP-ribosylation factor-like GTPase 11
Arntl−1.921.77 × 10−12Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like
Asb2−0.320.0002Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing 2
Atp2a1−0.770.0284ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 1
Atp4a−1.690.0075ATPase H+/K+ transporting subunit α
Bcat2−0.400.0038Branched chain amino acid transaminase 2
Bckdha−0.400.0083Branched chain ketoacid dehydrogenase E1, α polypeptide
Bcl6b−0.610.0055BCL6B, transcription repressor
C1qa0.570.0483Complement C1q A chain
C1qb0.740.0005Complement C1q B chain
C1qc0.690.0007Complement C1q C chain
C5ar10.610.0483Complement C5a receptor 1
Car4−1.150.0017Carbonic anhydrase 4
Cd140.670.0314CD14 molecule
Cd1630.920.0004CD163 molecule
Cd440.330.0353CD44 molecule
Cd680.990.0059CD68 molecule
Cd93−0.420.0065CD93 molecule
Cdkn1a−0.750.0011Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A
Cited4−0.520.0296Cbp/p300-interacting transactivator, with Glu/Asp-rich carboxy-terminal domain, 4
Clec4a10.860.0121C-type lectin domain family 4, member A1
Clock−0.440.0002Clock circadian regulator
Clu0.440.0055Clusterin
Col5a3−0.660.0280Collagen type V α 3 chain
Crispld2−0.450.0234Cysteine-rich secretory protein LCCL domain-containing 2
Csf1r0.510.0111Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor
Dkk3−0.300.0351Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 3
Dot1l−0.440.0190DOT1-like histone lysine methyltransferase
Ecrg4−1.270.0299ECRG4 augurin precursor
Eepd1−0.440.0007Endonuclease/exonuclease/phosphatase family domain-containing 1
Ephx10.840.0007Epoxide hydrolase 1
Exoc40.350.0073Exocyst complex component 4
F50.860.0345Coagulation factor V
Fabp3−0.411.03 × 10−5Fatty acid-binding protein 3
Fam160a1−0.510.0369Family with sequence similarity 160, member A1
Fam220a−0.400.0010Family with sequence similarity 220, member A
Fam26e−0.670.0235Calcium homeostasis modulator family member 5
Fcgr2b0.980.0314Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb
Fcna0.630.0015Ficolin A
Fhl2−0.510.0121Four and a half LIM domains 2
Gnb3−0.470.0093G protein subunit β 3
Gng20.470.0457G protein subunit γ 2
Gpsm1−0.420.0063G-protein signaling modulator 1
Grip2−1.460.0022Glutamate receptor interacting protein 2
Gsn−0.490.0008Gelsolin
Gstz1−0.690.0006Glutathione S-transferase zeta 1
Hadh−0.371.60 × 10−5Hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase
Heyl−0.310.0105Hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW motif-like
Hspa5−0.340.0456Heat shock protein family A member 5
Inha0.710.0345Inhibin subunit α
Ispd−0.440.0190Isoprenoid synthase domain-containing
Itga6−0.360.0011Integrin subunit α 6
Itgam0.900.0061Integrin subunit α M
Itgb20.800.0108Integrin subunit β 2
Kank1−0.390.0307KN motif and ankyrin repeat domains 1
Kcnma1−2.160.0008Potassium large conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily M, α member 1
Laptm50.500.0117Lysosomal protein transmembrane 5
Lbh−0.380.0226Limb bud and heart development
Lcp10.420.0162Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1
Leo1−0.340.0295LEO1 homolog, Paf1/RNA polymerase II complex component
Lgals30.810.0077Galectin 3
Lilrb3l0.820.0435Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily B member 3-like
Limd1−0.480.0015LIM domain-containing 1
Lingo4−0.550.0142Leucine-rich repeat and Ig domain-containing 4
Map3k7cl−0.660.0369MAP3K7 C-terminal-like
Mill1−1.780.0007MHC I-like leukocyte 1
Mrc10.700.0105Mannose receptor, C type 1
Mtfp1−0.330.0250Mitochondrial fission process 1
Mtus1−0.300.0077Mitochondrial tumor suppressor 1
Mx2−0.450.0004MX dynamin-like GTPase 2
Myh11−1.460.0483Myosin heavy chain 11
Myo5b−0.460.0261Myosin Vb
Myom2−0.851.53 × 10−14Myomesin 2
Nckap1l0.720.0091NCK associated protein 1-like
Npas2−1.431.51 × 10−6Neuronal PAS domain protein 2
Nrp2−0.310.0457Neuropilin 2
Ntsr11.010.0405Neurotensin receptor 1
Nudt40.370.0073Nudix hydrolase 4
P2rx40.420.0483Purinergic receptor P2X 4
Paqr6−0.570.0250Progestin and adipoQ receptor family member 6
Per20.841.29 × 10−9Period circadian regulator 2
Per31.250.0226Period circadian regulator 3
Phlda1−0.650.0420Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1
Pi16−0.580.0215Peptidase inhibitor 16
Pik3ip10.430.0043Phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1
Ppp1r14c−0.340.0405Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 14c
Ppp1r3c−0.410.0065Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 3C
Rapgef50.310.0451Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 5
Rasd2−0.770.0091RASD family, member 2
Rasl11b−0.590.0105RAS-like family 11 member B
Rcan1−0.630.0005Regulator of calcineurin 1
Rhobtb10.822.92 × 10−9Rho-related BTB domain-containing 1
Rhoj−0.410.0210Ras homolog family member J
Rimbp2−0.620.0025RIMS-binding protein 2
Rpl30.460.0120Ribosomal protein L3
Rpl3l−0.620.0004Ribosomal protein L3-like
S100a100.370.0154S100 calcium-binding protein A10
S100a40.841.60 5S100 calcium-binding protein A4
Slc38a2−0.310.0015Solute carrier family 38, member 2
Slc41a3−0.875.13 × 10−7Solute carrier family 41, member 3
Slc8a2−1.940.0454Solute carrier family 8 member A2
Smyd2−0.380.0483SET and MYND domain-containing 2
Sparcl1−0.400.0015SPARC-like 1
Srebf1−0.320.0166Sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1
Stxbp10.340.0038Syntaxin-binding protein 1
Tef0.740.0002TEF, PAR bZIP transcription factor
Tf0.640.0295Transferrin
Tfrc−0.510.0142Transferrin receptor
Tgm11.110.0084Transglutaminase 1
Tlr81.060.0053Toll-like receptor 8
Tmem176b0.310.0197Transmembrane protein 176B
Tmem179−0.510.0091Transmembrane protein 179
Tp53i11−0.420.0051Tumor protein p53 inducible protein 11
Tpsb2−0.780.0339Tryptase β 2
Trim16−0.360.0357Tripartite motif-containing 16
Tspan18−0.570.0084Tetraspanin 18
Tut10.510.0277Terminal uridylyl transferase 1, U6 snRNA-specific
Tyrobp0.500.0365Transmembrane immune signaling adaptor Tyrobp
Ucp3−1.694.13 × 10−5Uncoupling protein 3
Wee10.470.0357WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase
Table 2. Top gene families represented within DEGs.
Table 2. Top gene families represented within DEGs.
NameFDRNo. of DEGsGene Symbol
CD molecules, C-type lectin domain family1.99 × 10−815Mrc1, Pi16, Itga6, Itgam, Itgb2, Tlr8, Cd163, Tfrc, Cd93, Csf1r, Cd14, Fcgr2b, Cd44, Cd68, C5ar1
CD molecules, complement system, LY6/PLAUR domain-containing4.69 × 10−76Itgam, Itgb2, C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, C5ar1
Scavenger receptors0.00024Mrc1, Cd163, Cd14, Cd68
Basic helix–loop–helix proteins0.00265Srebf1, Clock, Heyl, Bmal1, Npas2
CD molecules, protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunits, integrin α subunits0.04072Itga6, Itgam
Rho family GTPases0.04072Rhoj, Rhobtb1
S100 calcium-binding proteins, EF-hand domain-containing0.04072S100a4, S100a10
Table 3. Select human diseases associated with a subset of DEGs in this study. The last column indicates the number of DEGs that overlap with the known set of genes associated with human disease. Refer to Table S3 for full list. CVD: Cardiovascular disease.
Table 3. Select human diseases associated with a subset of DEGs in this study. The last column indicates the number of DEGs that overlap with the known set of genes associated with human disease. Refer to Table S3 for full list. CVD: Cardiovascular disease.
ClassificationDiseaseFDRNo. of DEGs
CVDLibman–Sacks disease (nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis)0.00594
CVDCoronary restenosis (is_implicated_in)0.01502
CVDAbdominal aortic aneurysm (is_marker_for)0.02082
CVDMyocardial infarction (is_implicated_in)0.02084
CVDPosterior choroidal artery infarction0.02182
CVDPeripheral arterial disease0.03303
CVDHypertension (is_implicated_in)0.03364
Immune disorderC1q deficiency4.50 × 10−53
Immune disorderLupus erythematosus, systemic0.00135
Immune disorderComplement deficiency disease0.01253
Immune disorderSystemic lupus erythematosus (implicated_via_orthology)0.02003
Metabolic diseaseObesity2.83 × 10−913
Metabolic diseaseEndogenous hyperinsulinism0.00074
Metabolic diseaseExogenous hyperinsulinism0.00074
Metabolic diseaseCompensatory hyperinsulinemia0.00074
Metabolic diseaseInsulin resistance0.00075
Metabolic diseaseInsulin sensitivity0.00075
Metabolic diseaseHyperinsulinism0.00074
Metabolic diseaseMetabolic syndrome0.03305
Neurovascular diseaseStroke, ischemic0.00782
Neurovascular diseaseIschemic stroke0.00782
Neurovascular diseaseBrain ischemia (biomarker_via_orthology)0.02184
Neurovascular diseaseCerebral infarction, left hemisphere0.02182
Neurovascular diseaseAnterior choroidal artery infarction0.02182
Neurovascular diseaseCerebral infarction, right hemisphere0.02182
Neurovascular diseaseSubcortical infarction0.02182
Neurovascular diseaseCerebral infarction0.02182
Cancer, hematologicalMyeloid leukemia, chronic0.00084
Cancer, hematologicalAcute myeloid leukemia, m10.00146
Cancer, hematologicalAcute myeloid leukemia (aml-m2)0.00146
Cancer, hematologicalLeukemia, myelocytic, acute0.00576
Cancer, hematologicalAdult t-cell leukemia/lymphoma (is_marker_for)0.01812
Cancer, hematologicalAcute promyelocytic leukemia0.02183
Cancer, hematologicalHematologic neoplasms0.02582
Sleeping disorderSeasonal affective disorder0.00024
Sleeping disorderAdvanced sleep phase syndrome, familial0.00422
Sleeping disorderAdvanced sleep phase syndrome (is_implicated_in)0.00592
Table 4. Select pharmacologicals associated with a subset of DEGs in this study. The list contains current and discontinued drugs. Refer to Table S4 for the full list of pharmacologicals and associated DEGs. CVD: cardiovascular disease, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, MS: multiple sclerosis.
Table 4. Select pharmacologicals associated with a subset of DEGs in this study. The list contains current and discontinued drugs. Refer to Table S4 for the full list of pharmacologicals and associated DEGs. CVD: cardiovascular disease, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, MS: multiple sclerosis.
DrugUseNo. of DEGsFDR
Atorvastatin calciumAnti-CVD, antihypercholesterolemic70.0069
CerivastatinAnti-CVD, antihypercholesterolemic30.0371
SimvastatinAnti-CVD, antihypercholesterolemic140.0007
AbciximabAntithrombotic40.0002
LosartanAntihypertensive, angiotensin receptor blocker60.0190
ValsartanAntihypertensive, angiotensin receptor blocker60.0051
HydrochlorothiazideAntihypertensive, diuretic20.0305
IsoproterenolAnti-bradycardia, non-selective β-adrenergic receptor agonist241.043 × 10−6
MuraglitazarAntidiabetic110.0037
RosiglitazoneAntidiabetic273.669 × 10−5
TesaglitazarAntidiabetic120.0025
TroglitazoneAntidiabetic170.0305
BasiliximabImmune suppressor, organ transplant40.0002
MuromonabImmune suppressor, organ transplant40.0003
EfalizumabAnti-auto immune disease, anti-psoriasis40.0001
EtanerceptAnti-auto immune disease, anti-psoriasis40.0002
AlefaceptAnti-auto immune disease, psoriasis40.0001
RituximabAnti-Rheumatoid arthritis40.0001
AdalimumabAnti-rheumatoid arthritis, anti-Crohn’s disease, anti-psoriasis40.0001
PalivizumabAntiviral49.213 × 10−5
NevirapineAnti-HIV50.0246
DaclizumabAnti-MS40.0001
NatalizumabAnti-MS40.0001
ApomabAnticancer40.0048
BevacizumabAnticancer40.0001
CetuximabAnticancer40.0001
IbritumomabAnticancer40.0001
temozolomideAnticancer, brain60.0414
TrastuzumabAnticancer, breast40.0002
AlemtuzumabAnticancer, leukemia40.0001
DasatinibAnticancer, leukemia120.0018
DoxorubicinAnticancer, leukemia329.174 × 10−7
Gemtuzumab ozogamicinAnticancer, leukemia40.0001
TositumomabAnti-non-Hodgkins lymphoma40.0001
ClodronateAntiosteoporotic50.0039
Raloxifene HydrochlorideAntiosteoporotic130.0305
Zoledronic acidAntiosteoporotic190.0198
MelatoninSleeping aid115.279 × 10−5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tahimic, C.G.T.; Steczina, S.; Sebastian, A.; Hum, N.R.; Abegaz, M.; Terada, M.; Cimini, M.; Goukassian, D.A.; Schreurs, A.-S.; Hoban-Higgins, T.M.; et al. Simulated Microgravity Alters Gene Regulation Linked to Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease. Genes 2024, 15, 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080975

AMA Style

Tahimic CGT, Steczina S, Sebastian A, Hum NR, Abegaz M, Terada M, Cimini M, Goukassian DA, Schreurs A-S, Hoban-Higgins TM, et al. Simulated Microgravity Alters Gene Regulation Linked to Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease. Genes. 2024; 15(8):975. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tahimic, Candice G. T., Sonette Steczina, Aimy Sebastian, Nicholas R. Hum, Metadel Abegaz, Masahiro Terada, Maria Cimini, David A. Goukassian, Ann-Sofie Schreurs, Tana M. Hoban-Higgins, and et al. 2024. "Simulated Microgravity Alters Gene Regulation Linked to Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease" Genes 15, no. 8: 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080975

APA Style

Tahimic, C. G. T., Steczina, S., Sebastian, A., Hum, N. R., Abegaz, M., Terada, M., Cimini, M., Goukassian, D. A., Schreurs, A. -S., Hoban-Higgins, T. M., Fuller, C. A., Loots, G. G., Globus, R. K., & Shirazi-Fard, Y. (2024). Simulated Microgravity Alters Gene Regulation Linked to Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease. Genes, 15(8), 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15080975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop