Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Potential Biological Functions and Prognosis Values of RICTOR
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Evaluation of Genome Gap-Filling Tools Utilizing Long Reads
Previous Article in Journal
Single-Molecule Telomere Assay via Optical Mapping (SMTA-OM) Can Potentially Define the ALT Positivity of Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unravelling the Evolutionary Dynamics of High-Risk Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 Clones: Insights from Comparative Pangenome Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sequencing and Characterization of M. morganii Strain UM869: A Comprehensive Comparative Genomic Analysis of Virulence, Antibiotic Resistance, and Functional Pathways

by
Dibyajyoti Uttameswar Behera
1,
Sangita Dixit
1,
Mahendra Gaur
2,3,
Rukmini Mishra
4,
Rajesh Kumar Sahoo
1,
Maheswata Sahoo
1,
Bijay Kumar Behera
5,
Bharat Bhusan Subudhi
2,
Sutar Suhas Bharat
4 and
Enketeswara Subudhi
1,*
1
Centre for Biotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India
2
Drug Development and Analysis Laboratory, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India
3
Department of Biotechnology & Food Technology, Punjabi University, Patiala 147002, Punjab, India
4
Department of Botany, School of Applied Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar 761211, Odisha, India
5
College of Fisheries, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Gwalior Road, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(6), 1279; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061279
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 10 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Omics and Bioinformatics)

Abstract

:
Morganella morganii is a Gram-negative opportunistic Enterobacteriaceae pathogen inherently resistant to colistin. This species causes various clinical and community-acquired infections. This study investigated the virulence factors, resistance mechanisms, functional pathways, and comparative genomic analysis of M. morganii strain UM869 with 79 publicly available genomes. The multidrug resistance strain UM869 harbored 65 genes associated with 30 virulence factors, including efflux pump, hemolysin, urease, adherence, toxin, and endotoxin. Additionally, this strain contained 11 genes related to target alteration, antibiotic inactivation, and efflux resistance mechanisms. Further, the comparative genomic study revealed a high genetic relatedness (98.37%) among the genomes, possibly due to the dissemination of genes between adjoining countries. The core proteome of 79 genomes contains the 2692 core, including 2447 single-copy orthologues. Among them, six were associated with resistance to major antibiotic classes manifested through antibiotic target alteration (PBP3, gyrB) and antibiotic efflux (kpnH, rsmA, qacG; rsmA; CRP). Similarly, 47 core orthologues were annotated to 27 virulence factors. Moreover, mostly core orthologues were mapped to transporters (n = 576), two-component systems (n = 148), transcription factors (n = 117), ribosomes (n = 114), and quorum sensing (n = 77). The presence of diversity in serotypes (type 2, 3, 6, 8, and 11) and variation in gene content adds to the pathogenicity, making them more difficult to treat. This study highlights the genetic similarity among the genomes of M. morganii and their restricted emergence, mostly in Asian countries, in addition to their growing pathogenicity and resistance. However, steps must be taken to undertake large-scale molecular surveillance and to direct suitable therapeutic interventions.

1. Introduction

Morganella morganii is a Gram-negative facultative anaerobic, rod-shaped enteric bacterium of the Enterobacteriaceae family. It was initially categorized under the Proteus genus but subsequently reclassified as a distinct genus through DNA–DNA hybridization analysis [1,2]. This genus is distinguished by its capability to perform trehalose fermentation, generate lysine ornithine decarboxylase and is recognized as the type genus of the newly classified family Morganellaceae [3]. This family comprises eight genera: Arsenophonus, Cosenzaea, Moellerella, Morganella, Photorhabdus, Proteus, Providencia, and Xenorhabdus [1]. These bacterial species are detected in various ecological niches, including the environment, animals, and human microbiota. This organism is a crucial opportunistic pathogen because it can cause many clinical and community-acquired infections [4]. M. morganii has been implicated in various clinical infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to long-term urinary catheters, septicemia, and wound infections [5,6], which have more fatal consequences compared to those caused by Escherichia coli [7]. Invasive infections caused by M. morganii are commonly associated with a considerable mortality rate due to a lack of suitable empirical antibiotic interventions [8]. It has also been associated with various pathological conditions, including brain abscess, liver abscess, chorioamnionitis, peritonitis, pericarditis, septic arthritis, rhabdomyolysis, necrotizing fasciitis following snakebites, bilateral keratitis, neonatal sulfhemoglobinemia, and non-clostridial gas gangrene [8].
M. morganii is naturally resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and most of the first- and second-generation cephalosporins due to the presence of the ampC resistance gene [4,9,10] as well the last-resort drug, colistin [4]. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics resulted in the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) or even extensively drug-resistant (XDR) M. morganii, leading to the failure of therapy in clinical settings [11]. Various plasmids and transposons or integrons, such as the IncP6 plasmid carrying blaKPC-2, the IncN plasmid carrying blaOXA-181, the IncC plasmid carrying blaNDM-1, the IncX3 plasmid carrying blaNDM-5, the Tn7 transposon carrying blaIMP-27, the Tn6741 transposon carrying blaCTX-M-3, the Tn7 transposon carrying cfr, and the In1390 integron carrying blaGES-5, are also reported to be acquired [12,13,14]. Resistance acquired in M. morganii through these integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) and mobilizable genomic islands (MGIs) poses a clinical treatment challenge [15].
Whole genome sequencing of bacteria is the most suitable option for understanding the genetic processes behind this organism’s antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity and monitoring the spread of infections. Oxford nanopore sequencing (ONS) is a nucleic acid sequencing technology that uses protein nanopores to read genome sequences [16,17]. This technology can produce long DNA reads, making it useful for genome assembly, identifying structural variations, and detecting repeats. It has high accuracy in detecting small genetic variations and is essential for identifying antibiotic resistance and virulence in bacteria [17]. ONS also allows real-time sequencing, enabling the rapid identification of pathogens, monitoring bacterial populations, and detecting outbreaks at a reasonable cost within the laboratory setup [18].
This study aimed to analyze the genome of M. morganii strain UM869, isolated from a urine sample of a patient with a urinary tract infection in Bhubaneswar, India. The research investigated the genome’s virulence factors, drug-resistance mechanisms, prediction of genomic islands, and COGs functional pathways through a comparative genomic analysis using published M. morganii genomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of Bacteria

The strain UM869 was isolated from a 75-year-old female patient diagnosed with community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI), who was hospitalized in a super-specialty hospital at Bhubaneswar City, India, in October 2021. The antibiotic susceptibility and species identification of the strain UM869 was performed by an automated VITEK 2 system (bioMerieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Portland, OR, USA). The result was interpreted following CLSI guidelines (CLSI, 2018) [19]. The E. coli ATCC 25922 was taken as a reference strain for antimicrobial susceptibility testing analysis. Further, the species of the strain was confirmed by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA.
The strain UM869 was cultured overnight in Luria–Bertani broth medium (LB medium) at 37 °C in a shaking incubator (Remi orbital shaking incubator). The genomic DNA was then extracted from 2 mL of overnight incubated bacterial culture, as described by Sahoo et al. [20]. The quality and quantity of extracted DNA were evaluated using electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. The extracted high-quality DNA was subjected to 16S rRNA gene PCR amplification using universal primers [21]. The quality of PCR products was examined using electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. The PCR-amplified product was outsourced for sequencing at AgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Cochin, India. The quality-trimmed 16S rRNA sequence was submitted to NCBI’s GeneBank under the accession number ON533444.

2.2. Whole Genome Sequencing, De Novo Assembly, and Functional Annotation

The whole genome sequencing of the UM869 strain was accomplished using the Oxford nanopore technology platform at Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, India. Oxford nanopore technology (ONT) is a sequencing technology that produces long-read sequences (tens of thousands of bases) compared to traditional sequencing methods. These long reads benefit genome assembly, structural variant identification, and repeat detection. ONS is also portable and can be used in remote locations. The flow-cell FLO-MIN106 vR9 containing the prepared genomic DNA library was inserted into the MinION set, followed by sequencing using MinKNOW v1.7.14 [22]. Base-calling was performed using the ONT base-caller Guppy tool [23] and the fastq files were generated from the fast5 file using Poretools [24]. Porechop v0.2.1 [25] was used for adaptor trimming and NanoFilt v2.2.0 [26] was used to remove the reads having quality scores ≤ 20. The QC-passed high-quality long reads were assembled using Flye v2.9 [27] with default parameters, and the assembly files were assessed for quality using QUAST v5.0.2 [28]. The assembled sequences were deposited in the NCBI’s GenBank under the accession CP104700.1. The genome of the UM869 was annotated using the NCBI’s prokaryotic genomes annotation pipeline (PGAP) [29]. The genomic assembly of strain UM869 was explored to identify virulence factors and resistance genes determinants through the Virulence Factors Database (VFDB) and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD), respectively. The genome was further screened for mobile genetic elements (insertion sequence, transposon elements, plasmid signature sequence, and phage elements) using IsFinder [30], TnCentral [31], PlasmidFinder [32], and Phaster [33].

2.3. Comparative, Phylogenetic, and Core Orthologues Analysis

The genome assemblies of 81 publicly available M. morganii (subspecies morganii) were retrieved from the NCBI genome database on November 30, 2022. The completeness, and contamination of all the assemblies were evaluated by CheckM v1.2.2 [34], and BUSCO v5.4.4 [35]. The assembly with completeness ≥90%, and zero contamination (79 genomes) was taken for further downstream analysis.
To evaluate the genetic relatedness among the genomes, average nucleotide identity (ANI) was calculated using the ‘ANI’ module of PGCGAP v1.0.28 [36]. The generated ANI distance matrix was plotted into a heat map using the gplots [37] package in R Studio v4.1.3. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of single-copy core protein was reconstructed using the “CoreTree” module of PGCGAP v1.0.21 [38], and inferences were performed by plotting the tree using iTol [39]. Briefly, the sequence of single-copy core orthologues was extracted using perl scripts [36], and aligned using MAFFT [40], followed by a concatenation of each protein’s alignment. Further, the concatenated alignment of each protein was converted into the corresponding codon alignment using PAL2NAL v14 [41], followed by the calling of core SNPs using SNP sites [42]. Then, a phylogenetic tree was construed based on the best model of evolution using IQ-TREE [43]. OrthoFinder v2.5.4 [44] was used to identify core orthologue proteins among the genomes of M. morganii species. The consensus sequence of each core orthologue was generated by multiple sequence alignment using the CIAlign tool [45].

2.4. Functional Annotation of Core Orthologues

To annotate the core orthologues, the consensus sequences of all the core orthologues underwent BLASTing against KOfam, which is an HMM database of KEGG orthologues, using kofamKOALA [46] with an e-value threshold of ≥1 × 10−5. Subsequently, the eggNOG-mapper tool [47] with the EggNOG database [48] was employed to classify all the core orthologues sequences into clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs). Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified by BLASTing against the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) using RGI v5.1.1 [49,50]. Similarly, the virulence factors were identified by BLASTing core proteins against the Virulence Factors Database (VFDB) [51].

2.5. Comparative O-Antigen Gene Cluster (O-AGC) Analysis

The assembled sequences of UM869, and 78 genomes of M. morganii were BLAST against serotypes (type 1 to type 11) of M. morganii available in the NCBI database [52]. The island map of identified most similar O-AGC was created by gggenes v0.4.1 R package. Additionally, all the serotype genes were clustered at 97% similarity using CD-HIT [53]. Then, the genes were BLAST against the selected serotype sequence. Genes with 90% query coverage and 100% identity were selected to generate the heatmap through OriginPro v2021. A detailed workflow presentation depicting all the steps in the above methodology is shown in Figure S1.

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial Identification, and Antibiogram Study

The UM869 strain was isolated from a 75-year-old female patient with urinary tract infections in a super-specialty hospital in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. From the VITEK 2 analysis, UM869 was identified as M. morganii. The strain showed resistance to major antibiotics such as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefuroxime, cefepime, imipenem, ertapenem, amikacin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, minocycline, fosfomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole,, and colistin. The resistance phenotype was multidrug resistance (MDR), as interpreted using CLSI guidelines [19]. From 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the strain UM869 showed 99.77% identity at 99% query coverage with M. morganii NBRC 3848 (accession no. AB680150) through BLASTn analysis [54]. Further, whole genome sequencing using Oxford nanopore technology confirmed the strain as M. morganii.

3.2. Genome Sequencing of UM869

The de novo assembly of high-quality reads obtained from the nanopore sequencing technology resulted in one contig of 3,761,991 bp size, and GC content of 51%. UM869 had a genome fraction of 49.752%, and a genome completeness, and contamination level of 97.01% and 0.27%, respectively. The genome UM869 (NCBI assembly accession. GCA_025398975) comprised 2870 protein-coding sequences (CDS), 718 pseudogenes, 79 tRNAs, 22 rRNAs, and 1 tmRNA. The M. morganii strain UM869 was assembled into a single circular genome.

3.3. Resistance Genes, Virulence Factors, and Mobile Genetic Elements of UM869

UM869’s genome comprises 65 genes associated with 30 virulence factors, including efflux pump, hemolysin, urease, serum resistance, iron uptake, adherence factors, toxin, and endotoxin (Table S1A). The genome also contains 11 resistance genes, including Escherichia coli EF-Tu mutants, conferring resistance to puromycin; DHA-17, Hemophilus influenzae PBP3, conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics; and catII from Escherichia coli K-12, qacG, fosA8, KpnH, rsmA, CRP, and gyrB. These genes confer resistance to various classes of antibiotics, including cephalosporins, cephamycins, penams, phenols, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, diaminopyrimidines, and phosphonic acid antibiotics (Table S1B). They are also associated with alterations in antibiotic targets (PBP3, gyrB), the inactivation of antibiotics (DHA-17, fosA8), and the efflux of antibiotics (qacG, kpnH, rsmA, CRP). The genome also contained the insertion sequences IS200G, In36/37, and In6 with sequence identities of 84%, 99%, and 95%, respectively. IS200G is a salmonella-specific insertion sequence and contains the transposon gene (tnpA) [55]. This gene was located at position 1,945,287–1,945,977 bp, whereas, In36/37 and In6 were found at positions 580,797–582,017 and 1,049,772–1,050,897 bp, respectively [55]. These two insertion sequences are of E. coli plasmid origin (AY259086/5 and L06822) and carry the genes hypA (metallo-chaperon), ampR (transcriptional activator) and catA (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase). However, we obtained no positive results for the plasmid signature sequence and phage elements.

3.4. Comparative Phylogenomic Analysis of M. morganii Strains

In this study, we performed a comparative genomics analysis of 82 M. morganii genomes retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 30 November 2022)” from six countries, including the UM869 strain from this study (Table S2). The completeness and contamination levels of all the genomes ranged from 97.01–100% and 0–8.66%, respectively. UM869 showed 97.01% completeness and 0.27% contamination (Table S2). From the genome reannotation, the genome size of all strains ranged from 3,618,144 to 4,575,834 bps with varied N50 values (Table S2). Based on the contamination and completeness of the genomes, we excluded three genomes (GCF_026341575, GCF_018802465, and GCF_003852695) and performed a comparative genomics analysis of the remaining 79 M. morganii genomes.
ANI between strains was calculated and subjected to hierarchical clustering into major groups determined among the 79 genomes to identify the closest strains based on their genome similarities. Genomes with ANI values greater than 95% were considered the same species. Among the strains, the ANI values ranged from 91.79% to 100%, with the highest ANI (100%) observed between GCF_018475065 and GCF_018475585, whereas the lowest (91.79%) was observed between GCF_018456225 and GCF_018475185 (Figure S2). Similarly, the ANI value of the UM869 strain with all other strains ranged between 91.96 and 99.82%. Because the average ANI percentage of all the genomes was 97.92%, which is greater than the ANI cutoff of 95%, all the strains belong to the same species. The ANI tree (Figure S2) is divided into three clusters, namely 1, 2, and 3, containing 64, 2, and 6 strains, respectively. The UM869 strain (GCA_025398975) is clustered (99.82% ANI value) with GCF_018474645.

3.5. M. morganii Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity

The core SNP-based phylogenetic analysis exhibited diversity among the genomes of M. morganii (Figure 1). Phylogenetic analysis of the 79 M. morganii genomes revealed four major clusters and seven singlet nodes, as highlighted in Figure 1. We identified a close phylogenetic relationship between UM869 (GCA_025398975), isolated from urine, and GCF_018474645, isolated from sputum in China. However, it was found that the animal sample, i.e., GCF_018475125 and GCF_018475285, are closely related to the human samples (GCF_018475645 and GCF_018474925), although all four samples are from the same country (China) (Figure 1). The results unequivocally refute the hypothesis that host-specific lineages share a common evolutionary background with the host species under consideration [56]. The close sequence similarity between clinical and zoonotic strains demonstrates that food and the environment significantly transmit the strain from animals to humans and between countries [57].

3.6. Identification and Analysis of Orthologues Genes

From the OrthoFinder, we could assign 290,050 genes to 6069 orthogroups, which included 2447 genes belonging to single-copy orthologues, while 1577 genes remained unassigned to any orthogroups. Out of the 6069 orthogroups identified from the 79 genomes, 2692 (44%) were core orthologues (99% ≥ strains ≤ 100%), 306 (5%) were soft-core orthologues (95% ≥ strains < 99%), 1005 (17%) were shell orthologues (15% ≥ strains < 95%), and 2066 (34%) were cloud genes (0% ≥ strains < 15%) as predicted by OrthoFinder. Further, 2692 core orthologous groups were subjected to multiple sequence alignment to extract the consensus sequences for subsequent annotations.

3.7. Functional Annotation of Core Genomes

From the functional annotation, 2692 core orthologues were assigned to 7 pathways, 48 super pathways, and 254 sub-pathways (Table S3). The most commonly identified super pathways in all core orthologues were transporters (468 orthologues), two-component systems (148 orthologues), transcription factors (117 orthologues), ribosomes (114 orthologues), ABC transporters (108 orthologues) with EC numbers (98 orthologues), transfer RNA biogenesis, DNA repair and recombination proteins (88 orthologues), and quorum sensing (77 orthologues) (Table S3). The top 20 key super pathways (≥15 counts) are shown in Figure 2A. About 95 core orthologues were mapped to the “function unknown” category, suggesting that many aspects of M. morganii still require exploration.
The identified core orthologues of M. morganii mapped to 2627 distinct clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) were divided into 21 unique COG categories, as listed in Table S4A. The highest number of COGs (453) belonged to the ‘function unknown’ category [S], followed by [E] amino acid transport and metabolism (269), [K] transcription (225), and [C] energy production and conversion (201). However, the lowest COGs were observed in [A] RNA processing and modification (4), as shown in Figure 2B, while UM869 exhibits 73 cloud orthogroups belonging to 14 COG categories. Out of all COG categories, [S] ‘function unknown’ has the highest number of cloud orthologues (15), followed by [E] amino acid transport and metabolism (9), [P] inorganic ion transport and metabolism (9), and [K] transcription (7). Details of the COG categories with their descriptions are presented in Table S4B.

3.8. Identification of AMR and Virulence Genes

The annotation of core orthologues revealed that multiple antimicrobial resistance genes belong to different resistance mechanisms. Specifically, KpnH, PBP3, rsmA, CRP, and gyrB genes were identified in all genomes conferring resistance to fluoroquinolone, aminoglycoside, carbapenem, cephalosporin, diaminopyrimidine, phenicol, cephamycin, and macrolide antibiotics, as shown in Table 1. The presence of qacG in all the genomes confers resistance to disinfecting agents and antiseptics. Further, four antibiotic efflux resistance mechanisms, including major facilitator superfamily (MFS), small multidrug resistance (SMR), resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND), antibiotic efflux pump, and two antibiotic target alteration resistance mechanisms, were predicted among all the genomes.
From the VFDB database annotation, only 47 core orthologues annotated to 15 VF classes, 27 virulence factors, and 38 associated genes across all the genomes (Table 2). The most frequently identified virulence factors included the type III secretion system (T3SS), type I fimbriae, endotoxins, and toxins. The secretion system virulence factors class, such as T3SS, T4SS, and TTSS, were found to be particularly prevalent in pathogenic strains of the species, with several genes associated with T3SS, T4SS, and TTSS. Toxins, such as hemolysins, and endotoxins, such as lipooligosaccharide (LOS), were also identified, as were outer-membrane proteins involved in the adhesion and invasion of host cells. Autotransporters and flagella virulence factor classes involved in diverse functions such as adhesion, invasion, toxin secretion, and host colonization were detected less frequently among the strains (Table 2).

3.9. Serotype

In this study, we analyzed the serotype content of all 79 strains of M. morganii, as reported by Liu et al. [52]. The reported 11 serotypes were BLASTed against all the genomes. In thirty-one genomes, five serotypes were mapped with 100% coverage (Table S5). The type 8 O-antigen serotype was predicted in the genome UM869 at position 3,495,232 to 3,509,433 bp. The serotype region in UM869 was characterized by ten genes, including tarF, gt1, wzy, tagD, gt2, wzx, gnu, trmL, cysE, and gpsA, and five unannotated genes (ORFs) (Figure 3). These reported genes are involved in the biosynthesis and transport of the O-antigen component of the bacterial lipopolysaccharide. The presence of the wzx gene, responsible for encoding the O-unit flippase and the wzy gene, responsible for encoding the O-antigen polymerase, suggest that M. morganii is likely to synthesize its O-antigen via the wzx/wzy-dependent pathway (Figure 3). In addition, the genes present in all the mapped serotypes were clustered and BLASTed against 31 genomes. The result was visualized by plotting the presence/absence of genes versus the genome, as depicted in Figure 4.

4. Discussion

Epidemiological investigations have consistently identified M. morganii as a frequent causative agent of nosocomial bacterial infections worldwide [58,59,60,61,62]. Repeated reports on acquired resistance in M. morganii reveal more about their life-threatening actions as it further complicates existing treatment options [4]. Despite the serious clinical threat posed by the intrinsic and acquired resistance of M. morganii, it has received less attention so far. However, few studies have explored the evolutionary relationships and intricate internal genome structure of multiple genomes of M. morganii using genetic information from public databases [3,10,63]. Comparative genomic analysis, combined with a geographical region, isolation source, host, and antibiotic resistance gene content, is valuable for conducting genomic epidemiological analysis.
In this study, the MDR M. morganii UM869 strain genome, obtained from patients with urinary tract infection (UTI), was compared with 78 publicly available M. morganii genomes through ANI and core SNP-based phylogenetic analysis. Comparative phylogenomic analysis revealed that the UM869 genome was closely related to the GCF_018474645 (strain FS112720; isolated from sputum) and GCF_018474565 (strain E89; isolated from secretions) genomes from China (Figure 1 and Figure S2). The observed clustering of M. morganii strains from different geographic locations and isolation sources in a short timeline over a period from 2015 to 2021 suggests that these strains may be highly clonal [64] and might have spread due to their close geographical location in the map or dissemination due to frequent trade and tourism.
From the analysis of core orthologues, 290,050 genes were grouped into 6069 orthologues, of which 2692 were core orthologues. These core orthologues proteins usually retain their original function during microorganism evolution and help determine the relationships between genome structure, gene function, and taxonomic classification [65]. However, 2066 cloud genes might reflect the phenotypical traits specific to the group of M. morganii [66]. Therefore, it is important to classify these core orthologues into COGs and predict their functions, particularly in emerging pathogens with newly sequenced genomes [65]. This study mapped most core orthologues to transporters and two-component system pathways (Table S3). These transporters utilize ATP hydrolysis or proton gradient to transport a wide range of substrates across the membrane, including nutrients, toxins, and antibiotics [67,68].
Similarly, 2631 core orthologues were assigned to 2627 distinct COGs belonging to 21 categories. In the UM869 strain, 73 cloud orthologues were predicted and mapped to 14 COG categories. Moreover, most core and cloud orthologues were mapped to the [S] function unknown COG category, which might contain novel functional genes.
Several TCSs have been identified and characterized in M. morganii, including the PhoP/PhoQ, ArcAB, CpxAR, and PmrAB systems responsible for antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Studies have shown that the PhoP/PhoQ system regulates phosphate homeostasis, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance [69], suggesting that these strains might be highly resistant to antibiotics. This further complies with the resistance profiling as analyzed through VITEK 2 system. In this study, WGS analysis revealed that UM869 harbored KpnH, qacG, rsmA, and CRP efflux pumps, which may confer resistance to most routinely used classes of antibiotics such as macrolide, fluoroquinolone, aminoglycoside, cephalosporin, carbapenem, and colistin antibiotics (Table 1). The rsmA gene belongs to the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) efflux pump, which regulates quorum sensing, a communication system in bacteria, and the mutated rsmA is linked to increased production of biofilm, elastase, and antibiotic resistance [70].
Similarly, CRP is a regulatory gene that codes for the cAMP receptor protein, which regulates bacteria’s virulence genes and carbon metabolism [71]. Another multidrug efflux pump qacG gene that confers resistance to various antimicrobial agents, identified in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, is associated with increased resistance to commonly used healthcare disinfectants [72]. Fluoroquinolone resistance could be mediated by a point mutation in gyrB, which encodes the β-subunit of DNA gyrase [73]. The point mutation was also observed in PBP3 (penicillin-binding protein), which results in resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, such as penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems across various bacterial species, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [74,75]. However, only the UM869 strain exhibited unique resistant genes such as fosA8, ArnT, and qacG. Previous studies have reported that fosA8 expression in chromosomal fosA genes of E. coli significantly confers resistance to fosfomycin [76].
Similarly, ArnT, a glycosyltransferase, is essential for bacterial resistance against antimicrobial peptides as it adds 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose (l-Ara4N) to the lipid A component of lipopolysaccharide, enabling the evasion of antimicrobial effects [77]. The identification of multiple antibiotic resistance mechanisms in M. morganii emphasizes the potential threats associated with it. These mechanisms, including efflux pumps and gene mutations, enable bacteria to survive exposure to commonly used antibiotics, complicating treatment and increasing the risk of untreatable infections.
Several virulence factors have been identified in the M. morganii genome, including type III secretion system (T3SS), type I fimbriae, endotoxins, and toxins. In the UM869 strain, fimCDH genes are predicted as type I fimbriae virulence factors and play an important role in the colonization and pathogenicity of M. morganii as these are the most common virulence factors responsible for adherence to surfaces or other cells [4]. The iron acquisition and secretion system (T3SS, T4SS, and TTSS) was the most abundant virulence factor encoded in the UM869 genome that functions in immune evasion (IgA protease) and hemolysins [78]. The type-3 secretion system (T3SS) is a highly conserved virulence factor in disease-causing Gram-negative bacteria and is responsible for injecting bacterial effector proteins directly into the host cell cytoplasm [79]. Similarly, iron acquisition genes sitABCD mediate manganese–iron transfer and are essential for bacterial survival in iron-deficient environments [80]. The gene hlyA was also encoded in the UM869 genome, which is homologous to the α-hemolysin gene of E. coli. It binds to the cell surface and matures into a β-barrel transmembrane pore, creating an aqueous channel that permits the transport of small molecules such as K+ and Ca2+ ions, which causes the necrotic death of the target cell [81]. The UM869 genome also contains the efflux pump (farB), which contributes to resistance by pumping out molecules, such as bile salts and antimicrobial peptides, which can help the bacteria, evade the immune system and disease-causing agents [82,83,84]. The mobile genetic elements play a relevant evolutionary role that drives genome plasticity. The insertion sequence and transposon elements in the UM869 genome imply the possibility of disseminating resistant determinants via horizontal gene transfer [85].
The varied structure of O-antigen in bacteria differentiated the M. morganii species at the strain level. Liu et al. 2021 [52] developed a molecular serotyping based on diverse O-antigen gene clusters (O-AGC) in M. morganii. Based on serotype sequences reported by Liu et al., 2021 [52], 31 genomes were classified into five different serotypes (Figure 4) in our study. The gene structure of serotype cassettes was present in varied combinations in different strains of M. morganii, suggesting that the serotyping of M. morganii may be complex and require various genotypic and phenotypic methods to be understood [74]. In Gram-negative bacteria, the wzx/wzy-dependent pathway is predominant for producing O-antigen and differentiates the O-antigen clusters [86]. In this study, the serotypes predicted both wzx and wzy genes in the M. morganii genomes.

5. Conclusions

This is the first report from India that provides a genomic insight into the diversity and emergence of resistant determinants in M. morganii through a comparative genomic study. However, the episodes of the outbreak of M. morganii clones are less frequent and restricted to the eastern part of the globe (Asia). Therefore, studying the faster dissemination rate, the acquisition of resistance determinants, and the comprehensive surveillance of the M. morganii infection are all highly desirable before this genus potentially causes an uncontrollable epidemic. Further, the enrichment of the M. morganii public database will help better understand the bacteria’s origin, evolution, and transmission and also toward designing suitable therapeutics to overcome infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14061279/s1, Figure S1: Workflow of the genome assembly and annotation of M. morganii UM869 strain isolated from UTI, and comparative genomics analysis with other M. morganii genomes; Figure S2: Heatmap and dendrogram illustrating the ANI among the 79 M. morganii genomes generated by FastANI are organized according to the dendrograms (left/below) obtained with the neighbor-joining clustering method. The color represents the highest and lowest genetic similarity between the genomes. Genomes containing the ≥99% identity are shown in red, and identity containing ≤93% are shown in blue; Table S1A: Virulence factor and virulence class predicted in M. Morganii UM869; Table S1B: Presence of Antimicrobial resistance genes, resistant drug class and their presence in M. morganii UM869; Table S2: Metadata and summary statistics of 82 M. morganii genome; Table S3: Details of mapping core orthologues of 79 M. morganii strains to KEGG orthologues (KO) and KEGG pathways; Table S4A: Mapping of core orthologues gene of 79 M. morganii strain to the COG categories. Forty-three core orthologues did not map to any COG categories; Table S4B: Mapping cloud orthologues gene of UM869 M. morganii strain to the COG categories; Table S5: Mapping of 11 putative O-Antigen Gene Clusters (serotype) in 79 M. morganii strains using BLAST. Only 5 serotypes mapped to 31 strains at 100% query coverage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S., D.U.B. and M.G.; methodology, D.U.B., S.D., M.G., R.M., B.B.S. and R.K.S.; formal analysis, D.U.B., S.D. and M.G.; data curation, D.U.B. and S.D.; visualization, D.U.B., S.D., M.G., M.S. and B.K.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.U.B., S.D. and E.S.; writing—review and editing, D.U.B., S.D., M.G., R.K.S., R.M., M.S., S.S.B., B.K.B., B.B.S. and E.S.; supervision, E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

WGS sequence reads were submitted to the NCBI’s Bioproject database with the accession ID: PRJNA598939.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the infrastructure facility provided by the president of Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (deemed to be university), Bhubaneswar, and the computing facility at the Drug Development and Analysis Lab, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (deemed to be university) sponsored by ICMR (grant no. AMR/DHR/GIA/4/ECD-II-2020), India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adeolu, M.; Alnajar, S.; Naushad, S.; Gupta, R.S. Genome-Based Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the ‘Enterobacteriales’: Proposal for Enterobacterales Ord. Nov. Divided into the Families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae Fam. Nov., Pectobacteriaceae Fam. Nov., Yersiniaceae Fam. Nov., Hafniaceae Fam. Nov., Morgane. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 5575–5599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. O’Hara, C.M.; Brenner, F.W.; Miller, J.M. Classification, Identification, and Clinical Significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 534–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Minnullina, L.; Pudova, D.; Shagimardanova, E.; Shigapova, L.; Sharipova, M.; Mardanova, A. Comparative Genome Analysis of Uropathogenic Morganella Morganii Strains. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, H.; Zhu, J.; Hu, Q.; Rao, X. Morganella Morganii, a Non-Negligent Opportunistic Pathogen. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 50, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. van Bentum, J.S.; Sijbrandij, M.; Kerkhof, A.J.F.M.; Huisman, A.; Arntz, A.R.; Holmes, E.A.; Franx, G.; Mokkenstorm, J.; Huibers, M.J.H. Treating Repetitive Suicidal Intrusions Using Eye Movements: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, B.; Pan, F.; Zhu, K. Bilateral Morganella Morganii Keratitis in a Patient with Facial Topical Corticosteroid-Induced Rosacea-like Dermatitis: A Case Report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017, 17, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Erlanger, D.; Assous, M.V.; Wiener-Well, Y.; Yinnon, A.M.; Ben-Chetrit, E. Clinical Manifestations, Risk Factors and Prognosis of Patients with Morganella Morganii Sepsis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 52, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. van Bentum, R.; Nieken, J.; de Waal, E.; Hoogendoorn, M. Native Aortic Valve Endocarditis with Morganella Morganii in a Patient with Multiple Myeloma and Valvular Amyloidosis: A Case Report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kohlmann, R.; Bähr, T.; Gatermann, S.G. Species-Specific Mutation Rates for AmpC Derepression in Enterobacterales with Chromosomally Encoded Inducible AmpC β-Lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ryser, L.T.; Arias-Roth, E.; Perreten, V.; Irmler, S.; Bruggmann, R. Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Morganella Morganii Isolated From Cheese. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 738492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karaiskos, I.; Giamarellou, H. Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: Current and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2014, 15, 1351–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, X.; Zhai, Y.; He, D.; Cui, X.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, L.; Liu, J.; Hu, G. Molecular Characterization of a Novel Bla CTX-M-3-Carrying Tn6741 Transposon in Morganella Morganii Isolated from Swine. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moura, Q.; Cerdeira, L.; Fernandes, M.R.; Vianello, M.A.; Lincopan, N. Novel Class 1 Integron (In 1390) Harboring Bla GES-5 in a Morganella Morganii Strain Recovered from a Remote Community. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 91, 345–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Y.; Lei, C.; Zuo, L.; Kong, L.; Kang, Z.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H. A Novel Cfr-Carrying Tn7 Transposon Derivative Characterized in Morganella Morganii of Swine Origin in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xiang, G.; Lan, K.; Cai, Y.; Liao, K.; Zhao, M.; Tao, J.; Ma, Y.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Z.; et al. Clinical Molecular and Genomic Epidemiology of Morganella Morganii in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 744291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mikheyev, A.S.; Tin, M.M.Y. A First Look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION Sequencer. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2014, 14, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jain, M.; Olsen, H.E.; Paten, B.; Akeson, M. The Oxford Nanopore MinION: Delivery of Nanopore Sequencing to the Genomics Community. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Quick, J.; Ashton, P.; Calus, S.; Chatt, C.; Gossain, S.; Hawker, J.; Nair, S.; Neal, K.; Nye, K.; Peters, T.; et al. Rapid Draft Sequencing and Real-Time Nanopore Sequencing in a Hospital Outbreak of Salmonella. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. Standard, Approval CDM-A. In M07 Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018; p. 91. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sahoo, R.K.; Subudhi, E.; Kumar, M. Quantitative Approach to Track Lipase Producing Pseudomonas Sp. S1 in Nonsterilized Solid State Fermentation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 58, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Jain, M.; Koren, S.; Miga, K.H.; Quick, J.; Rand, A.C.; Sasani, T.A.; Tyson, J.R.; Beggs, A.D.; Dilthey, A.T.; Fiddes, I.T.; et al. Nanopore Sequencing and Assembly of a Human Genome with Ultra-Long Reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Holt, K.E. Performance of Neural Network Basecalling Tools for Oxford Nanopore Sequencing. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Loman, N.J.; Quinlan, A.R. Poretools: A Toolkit for Analyzing Nanopore Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 3399–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving Bacterial Genome Assemblies from Short and Long Sequencing Reads. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. De Coster, W.; D’Hert, S.; Schultz, D.T.; Cruts, M.; Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: Visualizing and Processing Long-Read Sequencing Data. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 2666–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kolmogorov, M.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Pevzner, P.A. Assembly of Long, Error-Prone Reads Using Repeat Graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tatusova, T.; Dicuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Siguier, P.; Perochon, J.; Lestrade, L.; Mahillon, J.; Chandler, M. ISfinder: The Reference Centre for Bacterial Insertion Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D32-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ross, K.; Varani, A.M.; Snesrud, E.; Huang, H.; Alvarenga, D.O.; Zhang, J.; Wu, C.; McGann, P.; Chandlere, M. TnCentral: A Prokaryotic Transposable Element Database and Web Portal for Transposon Analysis. MBio 2021, 12, e0206021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Fischer, J.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Guerra, B.; Mevius, D.J.; Hordijk, J.; Lefebvre, B.; Lévesque, S.; et al. In Silico Detection and Typing of Plasmids Using Plasmidfinder and Plasmid Multilocus Sequence Typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  33. Arndt, D.; Grant, J.R.; Marcu, A.; Sajed, T.; Pon, A.; Liang, Y.; Wishart, D.S. PHASTER: A Better, Faster Version of the PHAST Phage Search Tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W16–W21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the Quality of Microbial Genomes Recovered from Isolates, Single Cells, and Metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Manni, M.; Berkeley, M.R.; Seppey, M.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing Genomic Data Quality and Beyond. Curr. Protoc. 2021, 1, e323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, H.; Xin, B.; Zheng, J.; Zhong, H.; Yu, Y.; Peng, D.; Sun, M. Build a Bioinformatic Analysis Platform and Apply It to Routine Analysis of Microbial Genomics and Comparative Genomics. Protoc. Exch. 2022, 4, 88–100. [Google Scholar]
  37. Warnes, G.R.; Bolker, B.; Bonebakker, L.; Gentleman, R.; Liaw, W.H.A.; Lumley, T.; Maechler, M.; Magnusson, A.; Moeller, S.; Schwartz, M.; et al. Package “Gplots”: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. R Package. Version 2.17.0. 2016, pp. 1–68. Available online: https://rdrr.io/cran/gplots/ (accessed on 5 March 2023).
  38. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Solving Fundamental Biases in Whole Genome Comparisons Dramatically Improves Orthogroup Inference Accuracy. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (ITOL) v5: An Online Tool for Phylogenetic Tree Display and Annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.I.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A Novel Method for Rapid Multiple Sequence Alignment Based on Fast Fourier Transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mikita, S.; David, T.; Peer, B. PAL2NAL: Robust Conversion of Protein Sequence Alignments into the Corresponding Codon Alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W609–W612. [Google Scholar]
  42. Page, A.J.; Taylor, B.; Delaney, A.J.; Soares, J.; Seemann, T.; Keane, J.A.; Harris, S.R. SNP-Sites: Rapid Efficient Extraction of SNPs from Multi-FASTA Alignments. Microb. Genom. 2016, 2, e000056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R.; Teeling, E. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic Orthology Inference for Comparative Genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Tumescheit, C.; Firth, A.E.; Brown, K. CIAlign: A Highly Customisable Command Line Tool to Clean, Interpret and Visualise Multiple Sequence Alignments. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aramaki, T.; Blanc-Mathieu, R.; Endo, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Ogata, H. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog Assignment Based on Profile HMM and Adaptive Score Threshold. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2251–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. EggNOG-Mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Szklarczyk, D.; Heller, D.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Forslund, S.K.; Cook, H.; Mende, D.R.; Letunic, I.; Rattei, T.; Jensen, L.J.; et al. EggNOG 5.0: A Hierarchical, Functionally and Phylogenetically Annotated Orthology Resource Based on 5090 Organisms and 2502 Viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D309–D314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.L.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.; et al. CARD 2020: Antibiotic Resistome Surveillance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D517–D525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Feldgarden, M.; Brover, V.; Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Frye, J.G.; Haendiges, J.; Haft, D.H.; Hoffmann, M.; Pettengill, J.B.; Prasad, A.B.; Tillman, G.E.; et al. AMRFinderPlus and the Reference Gene Catalog Facilitate Examination of the Genomic Links among Antimicrobial Resistance, Stress Response, and Virulence. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, B.; Zheng, D.; Jin, Q.; Chen, L.; Yang, J. VFDB 2019: A Comparative Pathogenomic Platform with an Interactive Web Interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, B.; Guo, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, P.; Li, S.; Feng, L.; Liu, B.; Wang, L. Development of a Molecular Serotyping Scheme for Morganella Morganii. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 791165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, W.; Godzik, A. Cd-Hit: A Fast Program for Clustering and Comparing Large Sets of Protein or Nucleotide Sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1658–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Boratyn, G.M.; Camacho, C.; Cooper, P.S.; Coulouris, G.; Fong, A.; Ma, N.; Madden, T.L.; Matten, W.T.; McGinnis, S.D.; Merezhuk, Y.; et al. BLAST: A More Efficient Report with Usability Improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W29–W33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lam, S.; Roth, J.R. IS200: A Salmonella-Specific Insertion Sequence. Cell 1983, 34, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Palmieri, N.; Hess, C.; Hess, M.; Alispahic, M. Sequencing of Five Poultry Strains Elucidates Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence in Virulence Genes in Morganella Morganii. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sahoo, R.K.; Gaur, M.; Dey, S.; Sahoo, S.; Das, A.; Subudhi, E. Genomic Insight of Extremely Drug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae ST5378 from a Pediatric Bloodstream Infection. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2023, 33, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, I.-K.; Liu, J.-W. Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Mortality in Morganella Morganii Bacteremia. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2006, 39, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Gebhart-Mueller, E.Y.; Mueller, P.; Nixon, B. Unusual Case of Postoperative Infection Caused by Morganella Morganii. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 1998, 37, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, J.H.; Cho, C.R.; Um, T.H.; Rhu, J.Y.; Kim, E.S.; Jeong, J.W.; Lee, H.R. Morganella Morganii Sepsis with Massive Hemolysis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2007, 22, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sinha, A.K.; Kempley, S.T.; Price, E.; Sharma, B.K.; Livermore, D.M. Early onset morganella morganii sepsis in a newborn infant with emergence of cephalosporin resistance caused by derepression of ampc?-lactamase production. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2006, 25, 376–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Falagas, M.E.; Kavvadia, P.K.; Mantadakis, E.; Kofteridis, D.P.; Bliziotis, I.A.; Saloustros, E.; Maraki, S.; Samonis, G. Morganella Morganii Infections in a General Tertiary Hospital. Infection 2006, 34, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Guo, X.; Rao, Y.; Guo, L.; Xu, H.; Lv, T.; Yu, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, N.; Han, H.; Zheng, B. Detection and Genomic Characterization of a Morganella Morganii Isolate From China That Produces NDM-5. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, Y.T.; Peng, H.L.; Shia, W.C.; Hsu, F.R.; Ken, C.F.; Tsao, Y.M.; Chen, C.H.; Liu, C.E.; Hsieh, M.F.; Chen, H.C.; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Identification of Morganella Morganii KT Pathogenicity-Related Genes. BMC Genom. 2012, 13 (Suppl. S7), S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Tekaia, F. Inferring Orthologs: Open Questions and Perspectives. Genom. Insights 2016, 9, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kahlke, T.; Goesmann, A.; Hjerde, E.; Willassen, N.; Haugen, P. Unique Core Genomes of the Bacterial Family Vibrionaceae: Insights into Niche Adaptation and Speciation. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Drew, D.; North, R.A.; Nagarathinam, K.; Tanabe, M. Structures and General Transport Mechanisms by the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS). Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 5289–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sarathy, J.P.; Dartois, V.; Lee, E.J.D. The Role of Transport Mechanisms in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Drug Resistance and Tolerance. Pharmaceuticals 2012, 5, 1210–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lee, J.; Zhang, L. The Hierarchy Quorum Sensing Network in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Li, X.Z.; Nikaido, H. Efflux-Mediated Drug Resistance in Bacteria: An Update. Drugs 2009, 69, 1555–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Soberón-Chávez, G.; Alcaraz, L.D.; Morales, E.; Ponce-Soto, G.Y.; Servín-González, L. The Transcriptional Regulators of the CRP Family Regulate Different Essential Bacterial Functions and Can Be Inherited Vertically and Horizontally. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dashtbani-Roozbehani, A.; Brown, M.H. Efflux Pump Mediated Antimicrobial Resistance by Staphylococci in Health-Related Environments: Challenges and the Quest for Inhibition. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Han, J.; Wang, Y.; Sahin, O.; Shen, Z.; Guo, B.; Shen, J.; Zhang, Q. A Fluoroquinolone Resistance Associated Mutation in GyrA Affects DNA Supercoiling in Campylobacter Jejuni. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Macheboeuf, P.; Contreras-Martel, C.; Job, V.; Dideberg, O.; Dessen, A. Penicillin Binding Proteins: Key Players in Bacterial Cell Cycle and Drug Resistance Processes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 673–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Papp-Wallace, K.M.; Endimiani, A.; Taracila, M.A.; Bonomo, R.A. Carbapenems: Past, Present, and Future. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4943–4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Zurfluh, K.; Treier, A.; Schmitt, K.; Stephan, R. Mobile Fosfomycin Resistance Genes in Enterobacteriaceae—An Increasing Threat. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, e1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tavares-Carreón, F.; Fathy Mohamed, Y.; Andrade, A.; Valvano, M.A. ArnT Proteins That Catalyze the Glycosylation of Lipopolysaccharide Share Common Features with Bacterial N -Oligosaccharyltransferases. Glycobiology 2016, 26, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Nielubowicz, G.R.; Mobley, H.L.T. Host–Pathogen Interactions in Urinary Tract Infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010, 7, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Coburn, B.; Sekirov, I.; Finlay, B.B. Type III Secretion Systems and Disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Nunes, P.H.S.; Valiatti, T.B.; Santos, A.C.M.; Nascimento, J.A.D.S.; Santos-Neto, J.F.; Rocchetti, T.T.; Yu, M.C.Z.; Hofling-Lima, A.L.; Gomes, T.A.T. Evaluation of the Pathogenic Potential of Escherichia Coli Strains Isolated from Eye Infections. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Vandenesch, F.; Lina, G.; Henry, T. Staphylococcus Aureus Hemolysins, Bi-Component Leukocidins, and Cytolytic Peptides: A Redundant Arsenal of Membrane-Damaging Virulence Factors? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Nikaido, H.; Pagès, J.-M. Broad-Specificity Efflux Pumps and Their Role in Multidrug Resistance of Gram-Negative Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 340–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Li, X.Z.; Plésiat, P.; Nikaido, H. The Challenge of Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 337–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Poole, K. Stress Responses as Determinants of Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sadler, M.; Mormile, M.R.; Frank, R.L. Characterization of the IS200/IS605 Insertion Sequence Family in Halanaerobium Hydrogeniformans. Genes 2020, 11, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hong, Y.; Morcilla, V.A.; Liu, M.A.; Russell, E.L.M.; Reeves, P.R. Three Wzy Polymerases Are Specific for Particular Forms of an Internal Linkage in Otherwise Identical O Units. Microbiology 2015, 161, 1639–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Core SNP-based phylogenetic analysis among 79 strains of M. morganii. Metadata such as isolation sources, host, and country are marked with different colors. The year of isolation for each genome is labeled after its accession number. Strains associated with the four clusters are delineated by blue, green, light purple, and light brown branches. The tree scale is presented as the estimated branching length.
Figure 1. Core SNP-based phylogenetic analysis among 79 strains of M. morganii. Metadata such as isolation sources, host, and country are marked with different colors. The year of isolation for each genome is labeled after its accession number. Strains associated with the four clusters are delineated by blue, green, light purple, and light brown branches. The tree scale is presented as the estimated branching length.
Genes 14 01279 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of core orthologues mapped to KEGG orthologues pathways and clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs). Each bar represents the number of genes in their respective pathways/categories. (A) Top 20 KEGG pathways (≥15 counts). (B) Distribution of core orthologues in 20 COG categories mapped using eggNOG mapper.
Figure 2. Distribution of core orthologues mapped to KEGG orthologues pathways and clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs). Each bar represents the number of genes in their respective pathways/categories. (A) Top 20 KEGG pathways (≥15 counts). (B) Distribution of core orthologues in 20 COG categories mapped using eggNOG mapper.
Genes 14 01279 g002
Figure 3. The gene content of serotype cassettes present in 31 out of 79 strains of M. morganii was used in this study. The genes and unannotated ORFs are drawn as arrows with orientations (forward and reverse). The image was created with gggenes v0.4.1. The details of mapping are presented in Supplementary Table S5.
Figure 3. The gene content of serotype cassettes present in 31 out of 79 strains of M. morganii was used in this study. The genes and unannotated ORFs are drawn as arrows with orientations (forward and reverse). The image was created with gggenes v0.4.1. The details of mapping are presented in Supplementary Table S5.
Genes 14 01279 g003
Figure 4. The heatmap illustrates the presence and absence of genes, where yellow indicates gene presence and blue indicates gene absence in their respective strains. The numbers in square brackets represents the cluster variants of the gene at 97% identity. The serotype genes were clustered at 97% similarity using CD-HIT. Genes with query coverage of ≥90% and identity of ≥99% were selected for generating the heatmap.
Figure 4. The heatmap illustrates the presence and absence of genes, where yellow indicates gene presence and blue indicates gene absence in their respective strains. The numbers in square brackets represents the cluster variants of the gene at 97% identity. The serotype genes were clustered at 97% similarity using CD-HIT. Genes with query coverage of ≥90% and identity of ≥99% were selected for generating the heatmap.
Genes 14 01279 g004
Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance genes identified in core orthologues of 79 M. morganii strains. The AMR genes were identified using the CARD database in strict mode.
Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance genes identified in core orthologues of 79 M. morganii strains. The AMR genes were identified using the CARD database in strict mode.
Core OrthologuesGeneDrug ClassResistance MechanismAMR Gene Family
OG0000319KpnHMacrolide antibiotic; Fluoroquinolone antibiotic; Aminoglycoside antibiotic; Carbapenem; Cephalosporin; Penam; Peptide antibiotic; PenemAntibiotic effluxMajor facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pump
OG0000873PBP3Cephalosporin; Cephamycin; PenamAntibiotic target alterationPenicillin-binding protein mutations conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics
OG0001323qacGDisinfecting agents and antisepticsAntibiotic effluxSmall multidrug resistance (SMR) antibiotic efflux pump
OG0002043rsmAFluoroquinolone antibiotic; Diaminopyrimidine antibiotic; Phenicol antibioticAntibiotic effluxResistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pump
OG0002548CRPMacrolide antibiotic; Fluoroquinolone antibiotic; PenamAntibiotic effluxResistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pump
OG0002685gyrBFluoroquinolone antibioticAntibiotic target alterationFluoroquinolone-resistant gyrB
Table 2. Details of identified putative virulence factors in the core orthologues of 79 M. morganii strains.
Table 2. Details of identified putative virulence factors in the core orthologues of 79 M. morganii strains.
Core OrthologuesVirulence GeneVirulence FactorsVF Class
OG0000167fimDType I fimbriaeAdherence
OG0000540
OG0001077
OG0002806
OG0001650cheBFlagella (Burkholderia)Autotransporter
OG0001651cheR
OG0001256chuSHeme uptakeIron uptake
OG0001254chuU
OG0000956ireAIron-regulated element
OG0000280sitAIron/manganese transport
OG0001230sitB
OG0001229sitC
OG0000279sitD
OG0000533basGAcinetobactin (Acinetobacter)
OG0002794feoAFerrous iron transport (Legionella)
OG0002449hemGHeme biosynthesis (Hemophilus)
OG0001080phoQPhoPQ (Salmonella)Regulation
OG0000220spaPBsa T3SS (Burkholderia)Secretion system
OG0000295flhBFlagella (cluster I)
OG0000933exsAT3SS (Aeromonas)
OG0000857-T4SS effectors (Coxiella)
OG0000142invCTTSS (SPI-1 encode)
OG0000221ysaSYsa TTSS (Yersinia)
OG0000109ysaVYsa TTSS (Yersinia)
OG0000422hlyAHemolysinHlyA (Aeromonas)Toxin
OG0000833farBFarAB (Neisseria)Efflux pump
OG0001671htrBLOS (Hemophilus)Endotoxin
OG0002647lgtF
OG0002313lpxA
OG0000783lpxH
OG0001828lpxK
OG0002643opsX/rfaC
OG0000370wecA
OG0001781fimCFim (Salmonella)Fimbrial adherence determinants
OG0001782fimD
OG0001783fimH
OG0001347-Capsule (Acinetobacter)Immune evasion
OG0001468mgtBMg2+ transport (Salmonella)Magnesium uptake
OG0001659mgtC
OG0001656motAFlagella (Bordetella)Motility
OG0001655motB
OG0002110-Cysteine acquisition
OG0001526msbB2MsbB2 (Shigella)Others
OG0000371-O-antigen (Yersinia)
OG0000253galE
OG0000285-LPS rfb locusSerum resistance
OG0001161katACatalaseStress adaptation
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Behera, D.U.; Dixit, S.; Gaur, M.; Mishra, R.; Sahoo, R.K.; Sahoo, M.; Behera, B.K.; Subudhi, B.B.; Bharat, S.S.; Subudhi, E. Sequencing and Characterization of M. morganii Strain UM869: A Comprehensive Comparative Genomic Analysis of Virulence, Antibiotic Resistance, and Functional Pathways. Genes 2023, 14, 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061279

AMA Style

Behera DU, Dixit S, Gaur M, Mishra R, Sahoo RK, Sahoo M, Behera BK, Subudhi BB, Bharat SS, Subudhi E. Sequencing and Characterization of M. morganii Strain UM869: A Comprehensive Comparative Genomic Analysis of Virulence, Antibiotic Resistance, and Functional Pathways. Genes. 2023; 14(6):1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Behera, Dibyajyoti Uttameswar, Sangita Dixit, Mahendra Gaur, Rukmini Mishra, Rajesh Kumar Sahoo, Maheswata Sahoo, Bijay Kumar Behera, Bharat Bhusan Subudhi, Sutar Suhas Bharat, and Enketeswara Subudhi. 2023. "Sequencing and Characterization of M. morganii Strain UM869: A Comprehensive Comparative Genomic Analysis of Virulence, Antibiotic Resistance, and Functional Pathways" Genes 14, no. 6: 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop