2.1. Materials
Five different composite samples were investigated in the present study (see
Figure 1). One post-consumer material, supplied by a local CDW manager (Spain) originated from the dismantling of a building roof that had been exposed to environmental degradation factors, such as sunlight, humidity, and temperature variations. This real-waste sample was used to optimize the experimental solvolysis conditions. Once these were established, four construction composites, consisting of pre-consumer materials provided by a composite manufacturer (Spain) were tested to evaluate process applicability.
The post-consumer composite sample used in this study was sourced from a regional CDW manager in Aragón (Spain). Although the exact origin and service history of the component are unknown, reflecting a common situation in CDW, this lack of traceability is itself representative of the real waste treated in demolition and recycling facilities across Europe. Composites reaching CDW plants typically originate from roofing, façade elements, or structural profiles, and have been exposed for extended periods to the climatic conditions of the region, including high UV levels, temperature fluctuations, and humidity typical of the Spanish continental climate. The study therefore intentionally incorporates a sample collected from a real post-consumer waste stream. This heterogeneous FRPC captures the variability, degradation state, and information gaps that recycling technologies must handle.
In parallel, the four pre-consumer composites supplied by an industrial manufacturer were included to represent the principal resin chemistries and production routes used in European construction and infrastructure applications. Epoxy, polyester, and vinyl ester thermosets, combined with infusion and pultrusion manufacturing processes, collectively account for the majority of glass fiber composites used in panels, profiles, civil engineering components, and building elements. Although these specific items entered the study as waste offcuts, their resin–fiber architecture corresponds to standard commercial composite categories and therefore provides controlled, well-defined reference systems against which reaction mechanisms and fiber preservation can be reliably compared.
By pairing an aged, heterogeneous CDW sample with industrially relevant pre-consumer composites of known composition, the study evaluates both real-waste behavior and controlled, comparable reference systems. This two-tier material selection ensures that the developed process targets the most representative composites found at end-of-life, while remaining broadly applicable across the main resin types and manufacturing technologies used in the construction sector.
For experiments at the 40 mL scale, 3 g of material was used; CDW samples were washed and manually ground, while manufacturer samples were cut into fragments smaller than 5 × 5 cm to enhance solvent exposure and reproducibility. For the 600 mL-scale experiments, 45 g of material was used; CDW samples were cut into 10 cm-long pieces and manufacturer samples into 2 × 10 cm rectangles.
All reagents were used as received without further purification. Glacial acetic acid (≥99.7% purity, technical grade, VWR International S.A.S., Rosny-sous-Bois, France), ethylene glycol (≥99%, technical grade, VWR International S.A.S., Rosny-sous-Bois, France), zinc chloride (≥98%, VWR International S.A.S., Rosny-sous-Bois, France), choline chloride (≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), urea (≥99%, EssentQ®, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and glycerol (99%, Pharmapur®, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were used in the preparation of all solvent systems. All solvents and reagents met the purity levels commonly required for solvolysis and polymer degradation studies, ensuring reproducibility and comparability with the existing literature. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were prepared from these components as biodegradable alternatives for resin depolymerization.
2.3. Desing of Experiments
The experimental plan aimed to develop an efficient and environmentally sound process for decomposing polymer resins in FRPCs via MW-assisted solvolysis.
To ensure reproducibility, all experiments followed identical sample preparation procedures, heating programs, and solvent-to-solid ratios. For the 40 mL trials, composite fragments were weighed to 3.00 ± 0.05 g and placed into 100 mL glass reaction vials sealed with Teflon caps. Each vial was positioned inside a dedicated holder, which was then placed in a 1 L Teflon-lined vessel filled with ethylene glycol (see
Figure 3). The ethylene glycol acted as a thermal and dielectric bath to homogenize microwave absorption and minimize field heterogeneity. The assembled system was then inserted into the microwave reactor chamber for processing.
Temperature and pressure were controlled using the reactor’s PLC interface, with real-time monitoring of internal temperature, pressure, and applied microwave power. Heating ramps followed the programmed profiles (see
Table 1), and total reaction time was defined as the duration after reaching the set temperature. After cooling to <40 °C, the reaction contents were filtered under identical conditions; fibers were washed in a 60 °C water bath for 10 min, rinsed with acetone (analytical grade, ≥99.5%), and dried at 60 °C for 4 h before weighing.
Microwave power delivered to the load was automatically modulated by the synthWAVE system to maintain the set temperature. Maximum power during a typical 230 °C program ranged between 800 and 1200 W. These operational details, together with the specified sample size, solvent volume, reagent purity, washing protocol, and data processing method, allow full reproducibility of the solvolysis procedure.
The solvent systems analyzed included glacial acetic acid + ZnCl2 (5 wt.%), ethylene glycol + ZnCl2 (5 wt.%), and urea–glycerol–choline chloride (1:1:1 molar) as a DES alternative. After identifying the most effective configuration at the 40 mL scale, the same setup was applied to the manufacturer’s composites and subsequently scaled up to 1 L with the CDW sample.
2.4. Analytical Methods
2.4.1. Characterization of Composites
All composite samples underwent calcination to quantify their resin content. The process parameters were adjusted according to the type of reinforcing fibers and the thickness of the composite specimens, considering experimental conditions previously reported in the literature [
15,
16]. Notably, composites sourced from the CDW manager, which exhibited significantly lower thickness, required different thermal treatment conditions compared to those supplied by the manufacturer (see
Table 2).
To determine the resin content, each composite was weighed before and after calcination. The resin fractions are reported as mean ± standard deviation from five independent replicates (
n = 5) and were calculated as follows:
where m
1 (g) is the initial mass of the composite and m
2 (g) is the mass of the remaining solid after calcination.
Knowledge of the resin and fiber content allowed for a quantitative evaluation of solvolysis efficiency across the experimental process.
To further characterize the polymeric composition of the unknown CDW material, a qualitative assessment of the functional group composition of the samples was performed using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Measurements were conducted with a Spectrum Two spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA; 6PG10052-048) over the spectral range of 4000–450 cm−1. The composite surface was placed in direct contact with the UATR (Universal Attenuated Total Reflectance) sample holder (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA; 6PG10052-048-02) and the resulting infrared spectra were compared with reference databases and standard samples to determine the chemical identity of the material.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a TGA 8000 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA; 6PG10052-080) with a 10 °C min
−1 heating rate under two consecutive atmospheres to separate the main thermal events (
Figure 4): Stage 1 = 25–800 °C under N
2 to evaluate volatile release and primary degradation under inert conditions, followed by Stage 2 = 800–900 °C under O
2 to calcine the remaining organic residues (char) and thereby determine the inorganic fraction. In addition, coupled TGA–FTIR analysis (4000–625 cm
−1) enabled gas-phase identification of degradation products.
2.4.2. Characterization of Recovered Products
After each reaction, the solid and liquid phases were separated by filtration. The recovered fibers were thoroughly washed by immersion in a hot water bath (60 °C) for 10 min, followed by an acetone rinse. This process ensures the removal of degradation residues from the fiber surface. Finally, fibers were dried in an oven at 60 °C for 4 h and weighed, for the degradation yield determination.
In trials achieving ≥80% matrix degradation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to inspect the fibers for possible ZnCl2 residues and structural damage using an IN-SPECT-F50 instrument (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The samples were placed in an aluminum sample holder on carbon tape by cutting a set of fibers with scissors and carefully gluing them onto the tape. Subsequently, 20 nm of carbon was deposited using a carbon coater (EM ACE200, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and carbon wire as a source. The fibers were then observed under high vacuum and room temperature conditions and an accelerating voltage of 10 V and a spot size of 3 were used for imaging.
For determining the chemical compositions of the observed residues on the fibers, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XR-EDS) analysis with a spot size of 4 and spot spectra were performed.
On the fibers recovered from the experiments on the manufacturer composites of known initial characteristics, mechanical tests were carried out to evaluate to what extent the fibers maintained their properties after the solvolysis process. Mechanical testing followed ASTM C1557 using a Favimat+ tensile tester (Textechno Herbert Stein GmbH & Co. KG, Mönchengladbach, Germany) [
19]. Fibers were taken from both infusion and pultrusion composites to measure tensile strength, modulus, and elongation at break.