Next Article in Journal
Study of a Single Joint Between Two FDM-Printed PLA Filaments
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Seismic Performance and Structural Health Monitoring of a Retrofitted Reinforced Concrete Structure with Polyurethane-Based Interventions and Vertical Greenery Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Strategies for Incorporating Natural Therapeutic Agents into Hydrogel Dressings: Innovations in Wound Healing

National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, 409 Atomiștilor St., 077125 Măgurele, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(23), 3105; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17233105 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 November 2025 / Published: 22 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances and Emerging Directions in Hydrogels)

Abstract

Effective wound management demands novel therapeutic strategies that overcome the limitations of medication by reducing inflammation, preventing infection, and accelerating tissue regeneration. The present review provides an extensive examination of natural therapeutic agents incorporated into polymeric hydrogels for wound healing purposes. Significant focus has been paid towards extraction techniques that validate the standardization, purity, and biological efficacy of natural compounds, alongside several principal incorporation strategies: direct mixing, in situ incorporation, post-loading, and nano/microencapsulation, aimed at optimizing the stability of bioactive molecules within hydrogel matrices. Representative in vitro and in vivo studies are summarized to highlight the bioactive and therapeutic effects of hybrid systems based on polymeric hydrogels. Collectively, reported evidence indicates that natural-extract-loaded hydrogels accelerate wound healing through multiple complementary mechanisms, including inflammation modulation, antimicrobial protection, moisture balance, and enhanced tissue regeneration. Furthermore, synergistic mixtures of bioactive compounds have demonstrated enhanced antimicrobial and regenerative efficacy compared to single-component formulations. Overall, bioactive hydrogels incorporating standardized or nano-encapsulated natural extracts represent a new generation of multifunctional, non-pharmaceutic wound dressings that provide excellent biocompatibility and enhanced tissue regeneration in both acute and chronic wound healing.

1. Introduction

The skin, as the body’s primary barrier, protects internal organs from mechanical, chemical, thermal, and most importantly pathogenic insults. When this integrity is compromised, a complex and highly coordinated biological process of wound healing is triggered to restore tissue structure and function. However, conventional wound-care therapies, which often rely on topical antibiotics, face significant limitations. Their extensive and uncontrolled use has accelerated the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains, transforming otherwise treatable infections into chronic, non-healing wounds. Moreover, traditional dressings may cause discomfort and disrupt newly formed tissue upon replacement, while frequently failing to provide an optimal healing microenvironment [1].
Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop alternative therapeutic strategies that exert multi-targeted actions, simultaneously reducing inflammation and infection, protecting cells from oxidative stress, and accelerating tissue regeneration without exacerbating antibiotic resistance. Medicinal plants represent a valuable source of bioactive compounds capable of modulating multiple biological processes involved in wound healing. Phytochemicals such as flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and phenolic acids have been shown to attenuate inflammation, combat microbial invasion, scavenge reactive oxygen species, and stimulate collagen synthesis and fibroblast proliferation [2].
Since ancient times, natural therapeutic agents with pharmacological properties have been applied for wound treatment and infection prevention, offering a safe and sustainable alternative to antibiotic-based interventions. Numerous plant-derived extracts, Aloe vera, Curcuma longa (Turmeric), Azadirachta indica (Neem), Camellia sinensis (Green tea), Centella asiatica, Calendula officinalis (Marigold), Matricaria chamomilla L. (Chamomile), and Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s Wort), along with bee-derived products such as honey and propolis, have demonstrated advanced healing potential. An emerging and highly promising direction involves the incorporation of standardized and non-standardized natural extracts into medical devices, such as hydrogels [3], dressings, or sprayable systems, designed for topical wound applications [4]. The selection between standardized and crude extracts must be guided by the phytochemical composition, mechanism of action, and—critically—the scientific evidence, ensuring both efficacy and safety. Among the various carriers explored, hydrogels have gained considerable attention due to their unique physicochemical properties and high biocompatibility [5]. Their porous, three-dimensional structure mimics the extracellular matrix of natural tissues [6], providing an ideal scaffold for cell proliferation, migration, and nutrient exchange. Composed of 80–90% water, hydrogels maintain a moist wound environment, allow oxygen and vapor permeability, and promote angiogenesis, key events in tissue repair [7]. Furthermore, they are non-adherent, minimizing pain and secondary damage during dressing changes [8].
The use of hydrogels as delivery matrices for plant-based therapeutic agents represents a major advance in wound-care technology. By integrating the controlled-release capacity of polymeric hydrogels with the multifunctional biological activity of natural extracts, these hybrid systems provide a non-antibiotic approach to accelerate wound healing. This synergistic combination creates an optimal environment for tissue regeneration by effectively reducing inflammation and infection, mitigating oxidative stress, and stimulating angiogenesis and collagen deposition [9].
In recent years, the number of studies investigating hydrogel systems incorporating natural extracts has increased significantly, reflecting growing scientific interest in sustainable and bioactive wound dressings. Aloe vera, Curcuma longa, and Centella asiatica remain among the most frequently investigated extracts due to their high reproducibility and well-characterized pharmacological profiles. Despite these promising findings, challenges persist regarding the standardization of extraction procedures, the reproducibility of bioactivity, and the stability of hydrogel extract systems under physiological conditions, parameters that directly influence the biological performance and clinical applicability of these materials. The central research question of this review concerns how extraction, purification, and incorporation strategies shape the stability, bioactivity, and wound-healing performance of natural therapeutic agents embedded in hydrogel matrices. In particular, it examines how these processing steps influence physicochemical properties, release profiles, and biocompatibility, thereby outlining key design principles for advanced bioactive wound dressings.
This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the methodologies and effectiveness of incorporating natural therapeutic extracts into polymeric hydrogel matrices for wound-healing applications. In addition to synthesizing current evidence, the review introduces a distinctive perspective by comparing standardized and non-standardized extracts and by outlining emerging incorporation and encapsulation technologies that enhance the stability and functional performance of natural therapeutic agents within hydrogel systems. Emphasis is placed on the critical role of extraction methods, which determine the standardization and purity of natural compounds, as well as on the incorporation strategies employed during hydrogel formulation and their subsequent biological, therapeutic, and bioactive effects, as demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo studies. By addressing existing knowledge gaps and drawing attention to several natural therapeutic agents that remain underrepresented in previous hydrogel-focused literature, this review highlights the potential of these hybrid hydrogel systems as promising, sustainable and non-pharmaceutical alternatives capable of promoting angiogenesis, collagen formation, cell proliferation, and modulation of the inflammatory response throughout the wound-healing process.

2. Natural Therapeutic Agents in Hydrogel Dressings for Wound Healing

2.1. Plant-Derived Natural Extracts

Therapeutic compounds derived from medicinal plants have been extensively used in the treatment of cutaneous injuries due to their diverse biological properties (Figure 1).
Aloe vera leaves consist of three distinct layers (green epidermis, bitter latex outer pulp, and gel-containing inner pulp), each characterized by specific phytochemical compositions. The epidermis and latex are rich in anthraquinones and phenolics, while the inner pulp contains high levels of polysaccharides such as acemannan, which collectively contribute to the plant’s therapeutic versatility [10,11]. The wound-healing potential of Aloe vera is primarily associated with its anti-inflammatory and enzymatic components, including C-glycosyl chromone [12], carboxypeptidase, bradykinase [13] and the polysaccharide acemannan [14]. In addition, Aloe vera exhibits antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory effects by downregulating immunosuppressive cytokines such as interleukin-10 secreted by epidermal keratinocytes. Furthermore, Aloe vera modulates oxidative stress through activation of the Nrf2 pathway and exerts anti-inflammatory effects via inhibition of COX-2 [15]. Preclinical studies confirm that ethanolic extracts of Aloe vera, rich in phytosterols and fatty acids, enhance wound closure and collagen synthesis more effectively than crude gel, particularly in thermal or traumatic injuries [16]. Commercial hydrogels incorporating Aloe vera (e.g., Restauder®) demonstrated complete wound healing within 21 days in rats, comparable to standard care, confirming the extract’s compatibility with hydrogel matrices [17]. Similarly, CS (chitosan)/Aloe vera composite hydrogels (50:50 ratio) significantly reduced inflammation after three days and accelerated healing within 14 days by promoting epidermal thickening and wound contraction [18].
Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin are bioactive curcuminoids found in Curcuma longa L. that have been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-aging activities. Their anti-inflammatory effects are primarily mediated by suppression of the NF-κB signaling pathway, which leads to a reduction in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [19]. Curcumin facilitates angiogenesis via the upregulation of transforming growth factor (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) during the wound-healing process [20]. When incorporated into 20% Pluronic F127 hydrogels, curcumin reduced the healing period to 12 days in in vivo mouse models, surpassing the performance of blank hydrogels by stimulating collagen synthesis in granulation tissue [21]. In Sprague–Dawley rats, lyophilized CS/alginate/curcumin sponges accelerated healing within 12 days and promoted ordered collagen fiber deposition [22].
Bioactive constituents of Azadirachta indica (Neem), including sodium nimbidate, nimbidin, terpenoids, and flavonoids, display large antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory activities essential for collagen deposition and neovascularization. The anti-inflammatory effects are partly mediated through suppression of TNF-α production and reduction of prostaglandin E2 levels [23]. In rat wound models, topical application of ethanolic neem extract ointment achieved complete healing within 12 days, while oral administration of neem leaf powder required 14 days, demonstrating the superior efficacy of topical delivery [24]. Similarly, guar-gum (GG)-based hydrogels loaded with neem extract enhanced tissue regeneration and achieved full wound closure within 21 days compared with untreated controls [25].
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) is rich in polyphenolic compounds, particularly catechins such as epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), which exhibit strong antioxidant [26], anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial [27], and angiogenic activities. These biological effects are primarily mediated by EGCG through inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway and activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway [28]. Mice treated with EGCG-loaded PLGA membranes displayed increased vascularization and accelerated re-epithelialization compared with control membranes, confirming the compound’s pro-regenerative effects. Nevertheless, maintaining optimal EGCG concentration in hydrogel formulations is crucial, as excessive doses may exert cytotoxic effects [29].
Centella asiatica (CA) contains triterpene sapogenins and glycosides such as asiaticoside, madecassoside, and terminolic acid, which enhance fibroblast proliferation and stimulate type I collagen synthesis [30,31]. The plant also exhibits antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties that vary according to the extraction solvent. These biological activities are mechanistically linked to activation of the TGF-β/Smad pathway and upregulation of VEGF, collectively promoting fibroblast proliferation and angiogenesis [31,32]. Clinical trials have shown that CA-based formulations significantly accelerate healing of chronic diabetic ulcers and reduce scar formation compared with conventional treatments. Topical Centiderm® (derived from CA) produced faster burn healing than 1% silver sulfadiazine due to its high antioxidant and antibacterial activity [33]. Polymeric hydrogels incorporating CA extracts demonstrated strong in vitro anti-inflammatory and regenerative performance, achieving complete scratch closure with high fibroblast compatibility. Further in vivo validation remains essential to confirm their full therapeutic efficacy [34,35].
Calendula officinalis (Marigold) extracts contain terpenoids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, carotenoids, and coumarins, which contribute to its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunostimulant activities. Their anti-inflammatory effects are mediated by downregulation of IL-6 and TNF-α, while triterpenoids play a key role in enhancing fibroblast migration during the early stages of tissue repair [36]. When incorporated into poly(vinyl alcohol)-based hydrogels as hydroglycolic extracts, calendula promoted early re-epithelialization and increased collagen content after 21 days in rat models compared with unloaded hydrogels. Gamma-irradiated crosslinked formulations retained both biocompatibility and enhanced healing effects [37].
Several kinds of active compounds, such as chamazulene, alpha bisabolol, bisabolol oxides, spiroethers, and flavonoids, are responsible for the therapeutic benefits of Matricaria chamomilla L. (chamomile). In comparison to corticosteroids, aqueous and topical extracts of chamomile accelerate wound healing in rats, exhibiting an enhanced rate of wound contraction, increasing tissue strength, and a quicker recovery. Furthermore, chamomile extracts exhibit anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, and immunomodulatory properties. The anti-inflammatory effects are mediated through COX-2 inhibition and reduction of nitric oxide production via downregulation of iNOS [38]. Starch/zeolite/chamomile hydrogels demonstrated complete wound closure in 21 days in animal studies, characterized by enhanced epithelialization, collagen formation, and reduced inflammation relative to controls. In clinical applications involving patients with traumatic wounds treated with 2 wt% chamomile hydrogel, the average healing time was approximately 31 days with no reported infections or adverse reactions, underscoring the safety and efficacy of the formulation [39].
The bioactive components of Hypericum perforatum L. (HP) extract such as naphthodianthrones, phloroglucinols, flavonoids, bioflavonoids, and phenylpropanoids, exhibit antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimycobacterial, and antiviral properties, and stimulate collagen synthesis, fibroblast proliferation, and revascularization, which facilitate wound healing. These effects are partly mediated through modulation of inflammatory cytokines and the partial inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways [40]. When incorporated into Ultrez-based hydrogels (Ultrez 21/30), nanoemulsions containing HP significantly enhanced wound closure in rabbits compared with both macerated extracts and commercial control gels. Complete healing occurred within 12 days, supported by dense collagen formation and re-epithelialization, confirming its strong regenerative potential [41].

2.2. Bee-Derived Products

Honey and propolis are highly effective bioactive ingredients for hydrogel dressings due to their multifactorial mechanisms of action. Honey exhibits strong antioxidant activity mediated by enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase [42], antimicrobial effects driven by flavonoids and phenolic acids [43], and pronounced anti-inflammatory and moisturizing properties that enhance granulation tissue formation and angiogenesis [44]. Incorporation of honey into polymeric hydrogels has yielded accelerated healing in in vivo models: sodium-alginate (SA)/honey hydrogels containing 4% Dabur honey achieved complete closure of 1 cm wounds within 12 days [45], while chitosan-based hydrogels with 75% Manuka honey healed 10 mm wounds in 9 days [46].
A comprehensive overview of the main natural and bee-derived extracts incorporated into hydrogel-based wound dressings, along with their bioactive compounds and corresponding therapeutic effects, is provided in Table 1, which consolidates the experimental evidence presented above.
Table 1. Natural extracts and bee-derived products used in hydrogel-based wound dressings.
Table 1. Natural extracts and bee-derived products used in hydrogel-based wound dressings.
Natural
Extracts
Plant
Source
Bioactive
Compounds
Wound–Healing
Properties
Wound-Healing
Applications
Aloe vera
[47]
Aloe veraMannose-rich polysaccharide (glucomannan), anthraquinones, vitamins B1/B6/ B12, gibberellin, growth hormonesAnti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, stimulates fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, and angiogenesisEnhances wound closure, hydration, and collagen deposition when incorporated into hydrogel matrices
Curcumin [48] Curcuma longa
(Turmeric)
Curcumin (polyphenolic compound)Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant; promotes collagen deposition, wound contraction, and angiogenesisControlled release from hydrogels enhances healing efficacy
Neem
[49]
Azadirachta indicaNimbidin, terpenoids, flavonoids, azadirachtinAntibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory; supports tissue regenerationPromotes fibrocollagenic tissue formation and accelerates wound repair
Green tea
[50]
Camellia
sinensis
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), catechins, polyphenolsAntimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory; stimulates keratinocyte proliferation and skin regenerationProvides antimicrobial and pro-regenerative effects in hydrogel formulations
Centella
[51]
Centella
Asiatica
Asiatic acid, madecassoside, triterpenoidsAnti-inflammatory, antimicrobial; promotes fibroblast proliferation, ECM and collagen synthesis, tissue regenerationFacilitates dermal repair and skin regeneration in hydrogel systems
Calendula
[52]
Calendula
officinalis
(marigold)
Flavonoids, saponins, triterpenes (faradiol monoesters), carotenoids, tanninsAnti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial; enhances fibroblast proliferation and re-epithelializationExhibits anti-inflammatory and pro-healing effects in wound dressings
Chamomile [53]Matricaria chamomillaBisabolol, chamazulene, apigenin, luteolinAnti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antispasmodic; accelerates burn and wound healingProvides anti-inflammatory and healing-enhancing activity in hydrogels
St. John’s Wort
[50]
Hypericum perforatumHypericin, hyperforin, flavonoidsAntimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant; supports tissue repairEnhances antimicrobial protection and promotes tissue regeneration
Honey/
Propolis
[54]
Honey,
bee-derived products
Flavonoids, phenolic acids, organic acids, enzymes (glucose oxidase), vitaminsBroad-spectrum antimicrobial (bacteriostatic/bactericidal), anti-inflammatory, antioxidant; stimulates VEGF expression and fibroblast proliferation Promotes wound closure and tissue repair through occlusive and bioactive effects
Comparatively, curcumin, green tea, and Centella asiatica exhibit the most potent pro-angiogenic effects through upregulation of VEGF, whereas Aloe vera, calendula, and chamomile provide broader anti-inflammatory coverage. Azadirachta indica (Neem) and Hypericum perforatum demonstrate the most extensive antimicrobial spectra, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria. Meanwhile, bee-derived products such as honey and propolis offer a well-balanced combination of antimicrobial, antioxidant, and regenerative properties. These distinctions underscore the unique contributions of each extract to wound healing and highlight the importance of selecting specific agents based on the desired therapeutic mechanism.

3. Formulation and Synthesis Strategies of Hydrogels Incorporating Natural Therapeutic Agents

3.1. Extraction and Purification of Natural Therapeutic Agents

The preliminary stage of Aloe vera extraction involves washing, drying, peeling, and grinding the leaves, sometimes followed by disinfection with 1–2% sodium hypochlorite for 30 min and thorough rinsing to remove residual disinfectant [55]. The basal portions of Aloe vera leaf should be avoided, as they contain anthraquinones and glycosides, bioactive compounds that may cause allergic reactions when applied directly to the skin [56]. Leaves are typically cut to 0.5 mm, frozen at −18 °C for 24 h, and freeze-dried at −55 °C for 72 h, after which the product is ground and stored in amber vials under refrigeration. Various extraction methods are then applied:
(1) Stirring and maceration uses 1 g of Aloe vera with 25% ethanol at 60 °C and 180 rpm for 1 h, followed by centrifugation (4 °C, 9000 rpm, 10 min), washing of the residue, rotary evaporation (60 °C, 370 mbar, 50 rpm) to remove ethanol, and freeze-drying for 70 h to obtain the extract [57];
(2) Precipitation methods include (NH4)2SO4 addition to crude gel to remove proteins, followed by dialysis and lyophilization [58], or mixing Aloe vera aqueous extract with ethanol (5:1, v/v) to flocculate high-molecular-weight, alcohol-insoluble polysaccharides, which are then separated, washed, resuspended, frozen, and lyophilized [59];
(3) Soxhlet extraction employs 5–10 g of lyophilized Aloe vera with solvents such as ethanol, petroleum ether, or 98% n-hexane/2% ethanol [60] at reflux for 6–8 h, with no yield improvement beyond 8 h, and the extract is concentrated at 60–80 °C under reduced pressure [61,62];
(4) Ultrasound-assisted extraction can use either a bath or probe system; the bath extraction is faster, requires <5 g of powder, and less solvent, while the probe extraction requires more material, operates at 500 W and 20 kHz with 30% amplitude (Figure 2A) [61];
(5) Supercritical CO2 extraction is a clean, safe, and non-toxic method requiring >45–50 g of lyophilized powder, achieving higher yields than ultrasound-assisted extraction [63]. It can be performed under mild conditions (10 MPa, 313 K, CO2 flow 0.15 kg/h) or under higher pressures (30 MPa, 373 K) to obtain antioxidant-rich extracts [64]. Its non-toxicity and non-mutagenic effect on the Aloe vera gel have been demonstrated by Tanaka et al. [65];
(6) Microwave-assisted using very small amounts of Aloe vera (~50 mg), usually from fresh smashed leaves mixed with double-distilled water. The mixture is heated in a domestic-type microwave oven (2.45 GHz, 80 W) equipped with a water-cooled condenser to prevent solvent loss. Extraction proceeds in cycles of 1 min “on” and 30 s “off” [66].
The Calendula officinalis flower (air-dried and ground) was macerated with 50–70% v/v ethanol for 5–10 days at room temperature [67], and another method using a plant-to-solvent ratio of 1:10 (g/mL) [68]. Using percolation extraction, ~1 kg of plant is macerated in 70% hydroethanolic solution for 72 h, followed by percolation for 5 days [69]. By glycolic extraction, ~10 g of flowers is macerated in polyethylene glycol–water solution (9:1) in an amber glass flask at room temperature for 14 days with intermittent stirring [70]. Soxhlet extraction of C. officinalis uses ~500 g of air-dried and powdered flower, temperature of 70–80 °C for 8 h, employing n-hexane and ethanol as solvents [71].
Matricaria chamomilla, commonly known as chamomile, is typically incorporated into hydrogels through infusion extracts prepared at 80 °C [72] or at 60 °C, as shown in Figure 2B, hydroalcoholic extracts obtained via sonication at 400 W and 20–24 kHz in on/off cycles [73], or Soxhlet extraction [74]. Additionally, maceration is performed using 70% v/v ethanol for 48 h at 25 °C (Figure 2C) [75].
Centella asiatica can be extracted using several methods. One approach involves maceration with 95% ethanol (1:3 w/v ratio) for three days [76,77]. Alternatively, fresh leaves and rhizomes may be juiced and centrifuged at 4000 rpm [78]. Another method employs ultrasound-assisted extraction with 70% methanol as the solvent at 70 °C for three cycles of 60 min [35].
Curcumin is extracted from the rhizomes of Curcuma longa and is commercially available as a reagent with a purity ranging from 95% to 98%, supplied by various specialized chemical reagent companies. In addition, synthetic curcumin, with the molecular formula C21H20O6 and a purity greater than 97%, is also available on the market.
Grape seeds are extracted from the grape skins by filtering the mixture through a mesh sieve. The process of preparing grape seed powder involves a series of steps: washing, drying, sterilization, freezing, and superfine grinding [79]. An alternative of grape seeds extraction procedure includes using 33% (v/v) acetone in water for 15 h at room temperature and in darkness to prevent oxidation [80].
The extraction of green tea is performed using dried leaves in water or boiling water (80–95 °C, 10–60 min), followed by filtration and centrifugation (5000–8000 rpm, 10 min), and subsequently drying in a hot air oven at 60 °C or through lyophilization at −60 °C, resulting in a dark brown aqueous extract of green tea [81,82,83].
Neem leaf extract is obtained from the leaves of Azadirachta indica. Approximately 20 g of chopped leaves, finely powdered, are suspended in 100 mL of double-distilled water (DDW). The mixture is subjected to heating (70–80 °C, 30 min) or boiling at 100 °C (2 min). The resulting solution is filtered using a 0.45 μm PVDF Millex filter [84,85]. Another method involves using 100 g of finely ground dried leaves in distilled water with continuous shaking for 5–7 h at 120 rpm. The extract is filtered with Whatman No. 1 paper and subsequently lyophilized. The extract is reconstituted in purified water at different concentrations [25,86]. To prepare a macerate of neem leaves, a crude powder of mashed leaves is treated with 70% ethanol for 7 days. The filtrate is then concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 50 °C to yield a viscous extract [87].
The formulation of the hydrogels incorporated various types of honey, including manuka, monofloral honey, clove, cotton, fennel flower, lemon, orange, rapeseed, buckwheat, linden and vegetable honeys [44,88]. The concentrations of honey used were 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%, or even 400% (w/w) [89]. The raw propolis material is obtained from local beekeepers, with concentrations varying from 1% to 5% (w/v). Alcoholic propolis is obtained by extracting with 50–80% ethanol at room temperature for 24 h, followed by centrifugation to eliminate the wax present in the propolis [90]. Other studies used a 30% (w/v) propolis extract in water, diluted to a concentration of 2% (w/v), which is considered optimal for cosmetic applications aimed at anti-inflammatory effects [91]. Additionally, the propolis tincture can be obtained through maceration, using 200 g of raw propolis and 2 L of 70% ethanol, stored in amber bottles at room temperature for 7 days [92].
Bioactive extracts of St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) are obtained through hot water extraction at 85 °C for 5 h with stirring at 800 rpm. The resulting extract is then concentrated using a vacuum rotary evaporator at 60 °C for 1 h, followed by drying in a vacuum concentrator at 45 °C for 24 h [93]. Hypericum perforatum L. seeds are sterilized and germinated on a medium containing 2% sucrose and 0.75% agar (pH 5.6–5.8) at 25 ± 2 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle. Seedlings (3–5 mm) are introduced to callus-inducing medium with 2,4-D, BAP, 2% sucrose, and 0.75% agar. The dried callus is extracted with 100 mL of 80% ethanol for 72 h, centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 4 °C, 15 min), filtered, and concentrated under vacuum, freeze-dried for 48 h, and stored at −20 °C [94,95].
Figure 2. (A) Extraction processes of Aloe vera leaves; (B) Preparation of extracts of Matricaria chamomilla and Aloe vera powder; (C) Extraction of Chamomile. Adapted with permission from refs. [61,75,96].
Figure 2. (A) Extraction processes of Aloe vera leaves; (B) Preparation of extracts of Matricaria chamomilla and Aloe vera powder; (C) Extraction of Chamomile. Adapted with permission from refs. [61,75,96].
Polymers 17 03105 g002

3.2. Incorporation Strategies for Natural Therapeutic Agents

3.2.1. Direct Mixing (Before Crosslinking)

Direct incorporation of natural therapeutic agents into polymer precursor solutions prior to the crosslinking stage is one of the most straightforward and efficient strategies for hydrogel formulation [97]. Such loading approaches are widely applied across diverse polymeric and composite hydrogel systems, which possess hydrated networks and tunable crosslinking that enable efficient encapsulation and controlled release of bioactive molecules. In this context, recent literature also highlights hydrogels as a representative class of biomimetic matrices, whose viscoelastic structure and adjustable chemistry support cell adhesion, modulate inflammation, and promote wound healing [98,99]. This approach allows a homogeneous dispersion of bioactive compounds throughout the polymeric matrix, ensuring controlled distribution and enhanced therapeutic performance after gel formation.
Hanif et al. prepared composite hydrogels by dissolving polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), graphene oxide (GO), and Aloe vera extract in demineralized water, followed by ultrasonic homogenization and repeated freeze–thaw cycles to achieve uniform distribution of the extract throughout the hydrogel network [100]. Another study mixed Aloe vera extract with a 10% (w/v) PVA solution maintained at 50 °C, together with caffeine, vitamin C, and gentamicin prior to crosslinking; insolubility was induced by soaking the membranes in propyl alcohol, allowing simultaneous incorporation of multiple bioactives at the precursor stage [101]. In another study, silk fibroin (SF) hydrogels were produced by combining dialyzed fibroin solution with Aloe vera extract (3:1 v/v), followed by freezing and thawing cycles to induce gelation, resulting in hydrogels with a uniform microstructure [61]. Similarly, CS/PVA hydrogels were fabricated by blending polymer solutions and adding Aloe vera extract (5–15 wt%) and ZnO nanoparticles under continuous stirring before alkaline crosslinking [96]. Further, porous CS/SF/AV scaffolds were obtained by combining Aloe vera powder with chitosan and silk fibroin in specific ratios, followed by freezing and lyophilization [58].
Calendula officinalis extract, stabilized with glycerol and TWEEN-80, has been incorporated into polymeric matrices by direct blending at concentrations up to 5% relative to a carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-PVA mixture, with one formulation containing the extract/glycerol (Gly)/TWEEN-80 in a 95:1:4 (v/v) ratio [102]. Other approaches include mixing of glycolic Calendula extract (10% v/v) with a 1.5% alginate–1% CMC precursor solution [70] and preparing PVA/carrageenan (κ-CAR) hydrogels with hydro-glycolic Calendula extract at moderate temperatures prior to gamma irradiation [37].
Centella asiatica has been directly incorporated into various polymeric matrices using several formulation strategies. For instance, the asiaticoside-rich fraction (24 mg) was dissolved into autoclaved PVA/PEG precursor solutions prior to the freeze–thaw processing step [103]. In another study, CA extract was uniformly mixed into carbomer-based hydrogels below 40 °C under moderate stirring to preserve the bioactive components [77]. Furthermore, gelatin-based systems were formulated by adding CA extract to aqueous gelatin, followed by the addition of CS and pH adjustment to ensure a homogeneous precursor solution [35]. Similarly, gelatin/SA compositions were prepared using gelatin and SA combined with CA extract, resulting in a uniform biopolymer network (Figure 3A) [78].
In addition, chamomile extract (10% w/w) was dispersed directly uniformly into sodium alginate/gelatin mixtures prior to genipin and CaCl2 crosslinking [75]. Likewise, neem-mediated ZnO nanoparticles were added under stirring to a CS solution crosslinked with triethyl orthoformate, allowing 16 h dispersion at room temperature [104].
Moreover, honey-based hydrogels have been developed using different combinations of natural polymers and additives. Manuka honey was blended with CS and gelatin in equal proportions to obtain bioactive wound dressings [44], whereas in another formulation, honey (20% v/v) and Aloe vera (2.5% v/v) into alginate–CS solutions before ionic crosslinking with CaCl2 [105]. Additionally, formulations combining Aloe vera (1%) and honey (0–20%) with PVA were crosslinked with borax, leading to flexible and transparent hydrogel films [89]. Propolis has also been introduced into mung bean protein/κ-CAR matrices by dissolution in ethanol, followed by mild heating to gelation [106]. Similarly, honey-enriched hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogels were obtained through sequential mixing of honey, glycerine, and polymer under gentle heating conditions [88]. Further, natural polysaccharides such as agar, SA, and apple pectin were directly dissolved in plant extracts under heating or autoclaving conditions, followed by ionic crosslinking with CaCl2 to produce biopolymeric networks [93]. Finally, Hypericum perforatum callus extract was incorporated into CS–alginate mixtures at varying concentrations (0–2000 μg/mL) prior to CaCl2 crosslinking and lyophilization, yielding porous and biocompatible hydrogels with tunable phytochemical loading [95].

3.2.2. In Situ Incorporation (During Gelation)

In situ incorporation of natural therapeutic agents involves the introduction of bioactive compounds directly into the polymerization or gelation stage, enabling their entrapment or chemical integration within the developing hydrogel network. This approach ensures a uniform distribution of the natural extract during network formation and reduces phase separation or losses during post-processing [107].
Shanmugha Mary et al. synthesized a series of hybrid hydrogels based on gelatin (1–5% w/v, crosslinked with 25% glutaraldehyde), alginate (2% w/v, crosslinked with 1 M CaCl2), starch (10:1 ratio with urea), and PVA (12% w/v), in which Aloe vera extract (5 g dried powder in 100 mL water) replaced conventional Milli-Q water during polymer dissolution [108]. In another study, composite gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based hydrogels were obtained by mixing GelMA (40% w/v), DMA (5%), Irgacure 2959 (5%), NaOH (0.5% w/v), and 100% Aloe vera extract in equal proportions, followed by UV photocuring (100 mW/cm2, 5 min), ensuring uniform incorporation during photopolymerization [109]. Moreover, concentrated Aloe vera extract, pasteurized and filtered, was incorporated into poly(NVP-co-acrylamide) matrices (molar ratio 2:3). After partial copolymerization via Fenton’s reagent, Aloe vera (0–12% relative to polymer weight) was added prior to MBA crosslinking, leading to homogeneous hybrid networks [110].
Similarly, CA extract was introduced into precursor solutions containing CS, poly(β-amino ester) (PβAE), and the photoinitiator 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenyl-acetophenone (DMPA) prior to UV exposure, ensuring even dispersion within the polymer matrix [111]. In a comparable approach, chamomile extract was integrated into polymerization mixtures containing neutralized acrylic acid (40% KOH), starch (cold or hot), PEG diacrylate, and a photoinitiator system, facilitating uniform network formation after photo-crosslinking [72].
Curcumin has also been extensively employed through in situ methods across multiple hydrogel systems. For example, curcumin, nanocellulose, and Tween 20 were dispersed directly into a CS solution (5% acetic acid) under stirring, followed by glutaraldehyde crosslinking to yield uniform CS/nanocellulose composites [112]. In another case, curcumin (1.2–7.2 mg/mL in DMF) was introduced into a Z-Tyr-Phe-OH dipeptide precursor solution before gelation, producing stable hybrid gels with evenly distributed bioactive molecules [113]. Furthermore, modified quaternized chitosan hydrogels were prepared by adding curcumin (2 wt%) to the pre-gel solution prior to pH-induced self-gelation (pH 7.5), resulting in stable hydrogels with encapsulated antioxidant activity [114]. In protein-based systems, curcumin was blended with protein–sorbitol solutions during the heating process, followed by ultrasound treatment to enhance molecular dispersion before gel formation [115].
Plant extracts have also been successfully incorporated during polymerization in polyacrylamide (PAAM)-based networks. For instance, hydrogels were synthesized by dissolving acrylamide and green tea extract (0.0025–0.01 g) in water, followed by the addition of MBA crosslinker and a KPS/TMEDA initiator system (Figure 3B) [116]. Similarly, N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) was copolymerized in green tea aqueous solution (0.0054 mM) using the same initiator system, forming P(NIPAM–GT) hydrogels enriched with catechin components [117]. Another formulation combined green tea extract and gelatin in alkaline medium (pH 11), followed by crosslinking with sodium periodate, triggering sol–gel transition and generating antioxidant hybrid networks [81].
In situ strategies were further extended to the preparation of neem- and propolis-based hydrogels. Neem gum was dissolved in water under stirring, followed by the sequential addition of ammonium persulfate initiator, acrylamide monomer (AAm), and MBA crosslinker [118]. Similarly, propolis extract (1.0–2.5%) was incorporated into a poly(acrylamide)–methylcellulose precursor solution prior to the addition of sodium persulfate and TEMED, resulting in transparent hydrogels containing the natural antimicrobial agent [92].
Figure 3. (A) Preparation of Centella asiatica@3D scaffold in wound healing; (B) Preparation of Green tea hydrogels. Adapted with permission from refs. [78,116].
Figure 3. (A) Preparation of Centella asiatica@3D scaffold in wound healing; (B) Preparation of Green tea hydrogels. Adapted with permission from refs. [78,116].
Polymers 17 03105 g003

3.2.3. Post-Loading (After Gel Formation)

Post-loading involves the incorporation of natural therapeutic agents into preformed hydrogel matrices after network formation. In this approach, bioactive compounds diffuse into the dried or swollen hydrogel structure via immersion or soaking, allowing adsorption, physical entrapment, or ionic interaction without disrupting the crosslinked polymer framework. This approach is especially suitable for thermosensitive or photosensitive compounds prone to degradation during synthesis [119].
Ghasemi et al. reported the loading of Calendula officinalis flower extract into preformed CS/sodium alginate/PVA hydrogels by immersion for 2 h, enabling diffusion of the active components into the crosslinked network [120]. Similarly, Calendula officinalis hydroalcoholic extracts (5–20% w/v, ethanol/water 50:50 v/v) were introduced into polypropylene/PVA hydrogels through soaking, followed by air-drying and lyophilization to ensure stable entrapment of the extract and preservation of antioxidant capacity [121]. In another study, Calendula extract (1 mg/mL) was diffused into okra mucilage/2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid hydrogels for 24 h, followed by vacuum drying, achieving homogeneous loading within the polymeric matrix [122].
Post-loading has also been applied to the CA extract in various hydrogel systems. Hybrid hyaluronic acid (HA)–dextran patches were impregnated with CA extract at weight ratios ranging from 9.8:0.2 to 9:1, then washed and lyophilized to ensure uniform incorporation [123]. In another formulation, CA extract was loaded into gelatin/Fe-MOF and methacrylated gelatin/Fe-MOF hydrogels by immersing dried samples (0.15 g) in 50 mL of extract solution (250 ppm) for 24 h [124]. Likewise, dried hydrogels were soaked in CA extract solutions for 24 h and dried at 40 °C, facilitating efficient phytoconstituent diffusion [125].
Furthermore, curcumin has been post-loaded into gelatin-based hydrogel films via immersion in a 5 mg/mL DMSO curcumin solution at room temperature, enabling effective drug diffusion and entrapment within the gelatin network [126]. A similar strategy was adopted for PVA–grape seed extract–ammonium sulfate hydrogels, in which the crosslinked network was first formed via freeze–thaw cycles, followed by immersion in 40 wt% ammonium sulfate solution to post-load the salt [127]. Moreover, green-tea-enriched hydrogels were obtained by loading a green tea extract/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex (10–50 wt%) into CS/PVA hydrogels after gelation, achieving uniform antioxidant dispersion within the hybrid matrix [128]. In another study, Azadirachta indica (neem) extract (2 g) was dissolved in 0.1 M HCl and combined with preformed CS hydrogel, followed by nanoparticle addition and 24 h stirring, resulting in efficient post-loading and crosslinking within the structure [129].
Sharaf et al. introduced honey bee propolis extract (4%) into κ-CAR/β-cyclodextrin hydrogels applied onto textiles, ensuring homogeneous distribution by mild heating at 60 °C [130]. Finally, gelatin/xanthan gum (XG) hydrogels, thermally crosslinked at 130 °C for 30 min, were soaked in 50% w/w honey solution for 1 h, yielding honey-loaded patches with uniform absorption throughout the matrix [131].

3.2.4. Nano/Microencapsulation

Nano- and microencapsulation represent advanced strategies for incorporating natural therapeutic agents into polymeric hydrogels, providing enhanced stability and protection against degradation of bioactive compounds. In these approaches, plant extracts or active phytoconstituents are first encapsulated within nano- or microcarriers, such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, or ionically crosslinked beads, before being integrated into the hydrogel matrix [132].
Julie et al. developed a composite hydrogel system by encapsulating Aloe vera and Curcuma longa extracts via ionic gelation using 0.6% SA and 1% CaCl2, followed by freeze-drying at −40 °C and 0.5 bar. The resulting microcapsules were subsequently embedded within gelatin (1%), polyethylene glycol (PEG) (3%), and CS (1%) hydrogels crosslinked with 0.5 M NaOH, yielding a system capable of enhanced stabilization of the encapsulated bioactives [133]. Likewise, Aloe vera extract was encapsulated within calcium alginate or alginate–gelatin hydrogel beads by mixing the extract with alginate solutions and crosslinking with CaCl2 or glutaraldehyde. This process produced stable microbeads with well-dispersed bioactive content suitable for hydrogel incorporation [134]. In a related contribution, chamomile extract was nanoencapsulated via the preparation of a microemulsion composed of chamomile extract and almond oil (1:3 v/v) stabilized with Triton X-100, which was then dispersion in a 1% tragacanth gum (TG) solution and sonication [73].
Numerous studies have focused on curcumin encapsulation to overcome its hydrophobicity and poor solubility. One formulation strategy involved the creation of a Curcumin/Pluronic® complex by dissolving curcumin in ethanol and blending it with an aqueous Pluronic® solution, followed by the addition of PVA and mild heating at 50–70 °C. The curcumin/Plu-loaded PVA mixture was subsequently combined with TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TOCN), resulting in nanostructured hybrid hydrogels with improved molecular dispersion and stability of curcumin [135]. Another investigation incorporated liposomal curcumin dispersion into preformed Carbopol hydrogels containing lysine and collagen, achieving nanoscale homogeneity and long-term stabilization of the active compound within the crosslinked network [136]. Additionally, curcumin-loaded nanoemulsions were combined with alginate-based polymer solutions (CS, gelatin, or polyethylene oxide (PEO)) at a 1:3 ratio and subsequently dripped into 2% CaCl2 solution to generate ionically crosslinked microbeads. These spherical beads exhibited highly uniform curcumin loading [137]. Furthermore, nanoparticles were obtained by dissolving curcumin in aqueous 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and introducing this solution dropwise into CS solution (0.12% w/v in 4% acetic acid). The subsequent pH adjustment to 4.76 using trisodium citrate induced ionic complexation between curcumin and chitosan, leading to spontaneous nanoparticle self-assembly with high encapsulation efficiency [138].
Collectively, the studies summarized in this section illustrate that the choice between direct mixing, in situ incorporation, post-loading, and nano/microencapsulation is primarily dictated by extract stability, processing temperature, and polymer crosslinking requirements, rather than by differences in healing efficacy.

4. Biological Evaluation of Hydrogels Containing Natural Therapeutic Agents

4.1. Natural Therapeutic Extracts in Wound Repair: Experimental Insights from In Vitro and In Vivo Models

This section summarizes the experimental findings compiled in Table 2 and Table 3, which detail hydrogel formulations incorporating natural extracts evaluated for wound-healing applications. Both tables provide comprehensive data on the polymeric composition of the hydrogels along their therapeutic or biological effects outcomes reported in the literature. Table 2 contains standardized natural extracts with defined compositions, whereas Table 3 presents non-standardized or crude extracts obtained through diverse extraction methods. The biocompatibility and wound-healing efficacy reported in these studies were evaluated using well-established in vitro and in vivo methodologies, including assays for fibroblast viability and migration, hemocompatibility analyses, wound closure measurements, histological examinations, as well as assessments of collagen deposition and neovascularization.
Table 2. Standardized natural and bee-derived extracts in hydrogel-based wound dressings.
Table 2. Standardized natural and bee-derived extracts in hydrogel-based wound dressings.
Natural AgentsType of
Standardization
Polymeric
Composition
Therapeutic &
Biological Effects
Aloe veraPowder extract
(200× concentrate) [100]
10% PVA–0.05% GOExhibits antibacterial activity (99.94% inhibition S. aureus); Enhances fibroblast viability (~295%), and demonstrates
excellent cytocompatibility.
Powder extract [139] 2% Alginate–0.01% COL–0.1% GlyPromotes Hs27 fibroblast proliferation (up to 165%);
Antibacterial activity (75–90% reduction) against S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa; Enhanced wound healing potential.
Powder extract [59]1% Carbopol 940–2% HECDemonstrates effective anti-inflammatory and skin
regenerative properties.
Powder extract (purity of 99.01%) [140]50% Gelatin–20% Agar–10% GlyNon-cytotoxic to HDF and HaCaT cells; Promoted cell
adhesion, migration, and wound closure; Exhibits
anti-inflammatory activity.
Powder extract [141]0.1% CS–0.1%
dextran sulfate (DXS)
Exhibits antibacterial activity (≈50% inhibition of S. aureus and S. mutans); Shows antioxidant potential and improved wound-healing efficacy.
Powder extract [108]2% Alginate–5%
Gelatin
Demonstrates antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa (inhibition zones ≈ 15.4 ± 3 mm for gelatin and 13.7 ± 2 mm for
alginate hydrogels).
Powder extract [109]5% PDMA–8% GelMA Provides superior wound-healing and anti-inflammatory effects; Promotes tissue regeneration and exhibits excellent
mechanical and adhesive properties.
Calendula officinalisHydroalcoholic extract [142]Carbomer 940–PG–TEAEffectively manages 5-fluorouracil (FU)-associated
hand–foot syndrome.
70% EtOH macerated extract [68] Carbopol 980NF–PEG400Non-biological performance.
70% EtOH macerated
extract [143]
2% CS–25% PEG400Exhibits antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa;
Synergistic effects when combined with other extracts.
3% Lyophilized
hydroalcoholic extract [144]
CS–HPMC (2–3%)Demonstrated antibacterial activity against S. aureus,
P. acnes, E. coli.
10% Hydroglycolic macerated extract [70]1.5% SA–1% CMCNon-cytotoxic effects to 3T3 cells, Promote cell proliferation; Supports cellular processes essential for skin repair.
50% EtOH macerated extract [145]XG–PEG 8000Increases fibroblast migration; Promotes extensive
re-epithelialization within 9 d without scarring or hair loss.
(2–4)% Hydro-glycolic
Extract [37]
(8–10)% PVA–(0.75–1.25% κ-CAR
No in vitro hemolysis; Swiss 3T3 albino fibroblasts cells viability above 95%; Increased wound closure after 48 h;
Improvement in wound re-epithelialization,
neovascularization and wound retraction.
EtOH extract [122] Okra mucilage–AMPS-EGDMAExhibits antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli;
Increased blood clotting index; Improves wound closure and overall healing.
Aqueous extract [146](0.5–2.5)% CS–1%PVAStrong antimicrobial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, and C. albicans; >80% cell viability in L929 fibroblasts;
Potential for biomedical and wound healing applications.
Centella
asiatica
EtOH extract [123]1% HA–9%
Dextran
Enhances fibroblast viability and migration at optimal 0.4 wt% CA concentration; Promoted wound closure without cytotoxic effects.
90% MeOH extract [147]0.5% CS–1.25%
Gelatin
Stimulates fibroblast proliferation (up to 142%); Antibacterial activity against P. acnes (26 mm inhibition zone, MIC = 150 µg/mL) and S. aureus; Non-cytotoxic and non-irritant, suitable for anti-acne and wound healing applications.
Aqueous extract [78]2.5% SA–8% GelatinAccelerates wound healing and enhances
neovascularization at the wound site; Increases epithelial thickness and hair follicle density; Effective in diabetic
chronic-wound repair.
70% MeOH extract [34] 3% CSAntibacterial activity against S. aureus; Fibroblast migration and wound closure (73.4% at 24 h; 99.0% at 48 h); Synergistic wound-healing efficacy with good biocompatibility.
70% EtOH extract [124] 3.6% Gelatin–3.6% MAAnAntibacterial activity (inhibition zones 19–28 mm; MIC = 3.125–6.25 mg/mL) against Bacillus, E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, and C. albicans; Non-toxic,
biocompatible and promoted cell growth.
96% EtOH extract [111]30% CS–poly
(β amino ester)
Achieves 99.5% wound closure within 24 h; Antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus;
Positive effect on L929 cell proliferation.
Ultrasound-assisted extract (70% MeOH) [35]3% CS–2% GelatinPromotes fibroblast migration and wound closure (up to 99.9% after 36 h); Biocompatible, stimulates collagen synthesis and angiogenesis.
70% EtOH extract [125]Gelatin–AA–AAmHFF-2 cell viability; Significant antibacterial efficacy against multiple bacterial strains.
ChamomileAqueous extract [148]0.5% TG–0.5% SA–0.5% BCAntibacterial activity against Gram-positive and
Gram-negative bacteria; Enhanced fibroblast cell viability and proliferation; Non-cytotoxicity and excellent biocompatibility.
Curcumin (Curcuma longa) Powder extract [126] 5% Gelatin–
(0.5-1%) BC
Antibacterial activity (E. coli: 15 ± 0.5 mm; S. aureus: 19 ± 1 mm inhibition zones); Induced bacterial cell wall damage and death; Enhanced fibroblast proliferation and migration, leading to complete wound closure with 18 h; Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.
100% EtOH extract [135]1% TOCN–(5–10)% PVAPromoted fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition; Enhances wound contraction and tissue regeneration; Accelerates re-epithelization (≈81% closure after 2 weeks); Cell viability (~85%) and strong biocompatibility.
Powder extract [149]4% SA–20.4% NIPAM Accelerated wound contraction (≈96.5% closure at day 14) with complete re-epithelialization; Enhanced fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis; Significantly reduces inflammation via NF-κB/TNF-α/IL-1 inhibition; Biocompatibility and regenerative effect.
Powder extract [150]0.5% GGFibroblast proliferation (+45%) and collagen synthesis (+50% at 14 days); Enhanced cell migration (up to 100% vs. control) and re-epithelialization (73% closure at day 12); Antibacterial activity and excellent biocompatibility (≥80% cell viability).
MeOH extract [136]2% Carbopol–0.25% COL Wound-healing efficacy with 79.25% wound contraction by day 3 and complete closure by day 7, without scarring;
Re-epithelialization (>70%) and collagen deposition;
Anti-inflammatory effects via TLR4 and NF-κB inhibition. Excellent cytocompatibility and tissue regeneration.
Powder extract [151]0.2% CS–4% PVAAntibacterial activity against Streptococcus faecalis and E. coli (MIC = 2.60 ± 1.13 µg/mL and 1.30 ± 0.56 µg/mL, respectively).
Powder extract [152]3% SF–3% Pluronic F127Cytocompatibility with fibroblast cells (no cytotoxicity after 1–7 days); Achieving up to 5-log reduction in bacterial growth; Provides potent bactericidal and bioactive properties.
Powder extract [153] 2% CS–2% GelatinDemonstrated >95% antibacterial efficiency against E. coli and S. aureus; Strong antioxidant performance.
Powder extract [154] 3.5% Ammonium alginate–3.5% PVAAntioxidant activity (DPPH = 72.6%; ABTS = 98.50% after 6 h); Excellent biocompatibility (L0-2 cell viability >120% after 24 h) and hemocompatibility (hemolysis <5%).
Powder extract [114]2.5% QCSExcellent cytocompatibility with L929 fibroblasts (cell viability >100% after 5 days; Antioxidant capacity (DPPH scavenging 76.2%); Accelerated wound closure: 63.4% at day 3; 86.6% at day 10); Reduces inflammation and enhances granulation, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis.
80% EtOH extract [155] 10% GelMA–5% SFProvides 90.3% (S. aureus) and 87.9% (E. coli) reduction in colonies; inhibition zones of 30.9 ± 0.55 mm and 32.9 ± 0.49 mm; Maintains fibroblast viability >95% after 3 days; excellent hemocompatibility (hemolysis 1.18 ± 0.34%).
75% EtOH extract [156]5–10% GelMAExcellent cytocompatibility with L929 fibroblasts; Strong antioxidant protection under oxidative stress, restoring H2O2-treated cell viability; Pronounced anti-inflammatory activity.
Grape70% EtOH extract of white pomace [157]0.5% CS–
1% Alginate
Moderate antioxidant activity (1.016 ± 0.288 µmol/L);
Antibacterial efficacy against S. aureus (~97% growth reduction) and non-toxic.
Draksha–Beeja
powdered extract [158]
5% Starch–5%
Gelatin
Excellent cytocompatibility with >99% L929 fibroblast viability and strong cell proliferation; Highly hemocompatibility (hemolysis ≈ 1.5%) and regenerative potential.
Green TeaPowder extract [159]1% PVA–1% SAAntibacterial activity, stronger against S. aureus than E. coli; Inhibition halos and OD600 reduction confirm effective suppression of bacterial proliferation; Excessive extract loading reduced antimicrobial efficiency.
Neem
(Azadirachta indica)
Aqueous extract [160]0.25% N-succinyl chitosan–20% Pluronic F127Demonstrates dose-dependent antioxidant activity in DPPH assay (39% at 0.05 g/mL to 75% at 0.30 g/mL);
Potential to reduce oxidative stress and inflammation in wound environments.
Powder extract [129]0.1% PCL–0.2% Kolliphor P188Pronounced antibacterial activity against S. typhi, E. coli, and S. aureus.
St. John’s WortH. perforatum callus powdered extract [95]1% CS–1% SADemonstrates dose-dependent enhancement of fibroblast proliferation; Excellent cytocompatibility (≈96% viability),
cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation;
Antibacterial activity against E. coli and K. pneumoniae.
80% EtOH extract of H. perforatum callus [94]2% PV–1% CS–
1% Alginate
Excellent cytocompatibility with fibroblast viability around 99%; Enhances cell proliferation up to 150%; Promotes strong cell adhesion and accelerated wound closure (>99% healing within 14 days).
HoneyOrganic Manuka honey extract [161]4% CS–4% GelatinExhibits strong antibacterial activity, inhibiting bacterial growth for up to 12 h; Accelerates wound healing via antimicrobial and exudate absorptive effects.
EtOH extract of
Propolis [162]
2% Carbopol 934–2% PGAntibacterial activity against S. aureus and S. epidermidis; Excellent cytocompatibility with NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and anti-inflammatory effects; Promotes rapid wound contraction (>90% by day 14) and near-complete
re-epithelialization (≈96% by day 28).
75% EtOH extract of propolis [130]4% κ-CARAntimicrobial activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and C. albicans; No inhibitory effect against A. niger.
70% EtOH macerated
extract of propolis [163]
10% PVAAntimicrobial activity against S. mutans, E. coli, and C. albicans (inhibition zones up to 19 mm; MIC = 0.025–0.05 mg/mL); Excellent cytocompatibility (≥90% cell viability up to 125 μg/mL) and enhanced fibroblast adhesion.
70% EtOH macerated
extract of propolis [92]
7.2% AAm–0.5% MCStrong antibacterial activity against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa; Moderate antifungal activity against C. albicans and C. tropicalis; Antioxidant potential.
To gain a deeper insight into these results, representative studies were examined in greater detail, emphasizing in vitro and in vivo investigations that elucidate the wound-healing efficacy of hydrogels loaded with natural therapeutic agents. Among the most extensively studied systems, DMA–GelMA hydrogels incorporating Aloe vera extract exhibited remarkable regenerative performance. In vitro assays revealed strong stimulation of fibroblast proliferation and migration, with 22.6-fold and 49.5-fold up-regulation of collagen I and III expression, respectively. In vivo, PDMA–GelMA dressings accelerated wound closure, enhanced granulation tissue formation, and increased collagen deposition compared with both the neat hydrogel and a commercial CS/HA biogel [109]. Consistently, multilayer nanofibrous membranes composed of PVA, CS, κ-Car, and Aloe vera demonstrated superior healing in burn-injured mice compared with the untreated control. The composition achieved complete wound closure within 28 days, promoting rapid contraction and tissue regeneration without scar formation. Histological analysis revealed reduced inflammation, enhanced fibroblast proliferation, and uniform collagen deposition, accompanied by increased angiogenesis and re-epithelialization produced complete wound closure within 28 days in burn-injured mice. The treated tissue exhibited rapid contraction and regeneration without scarring, accompanied by reduced inflammation, abundant fibroblast infiltration, and uniform collagen deposition, together with intensified angiogenesis and re-epithelialization [164].
The beneficial role of Calendula officinalis (marigold) has been confirmed in several independent studies. An alginate-based hydrogel containing 10% (v/v) glycolic extract of C. officinalis promoted 3T3 cell proliferation without cytotoxic effects and significantly accelerated wound contraction in rats by day 14. Histological evaluation revealed diminished inflammatory cell infiltration and enhanced collagen organization, consistent with the anti-inflammatory activity of the extract [70]. Similarly, compositions containing Calendula officinalis demonstrated accelerated in vivo wound healing, achieving 96.1 ± 0.9% wound retraction by day 16 for the encapsulated hydrogel, surpassing both the unencapsulated and control groups. The elevated hydroxyproline content (255.7 ± 0.8 µg/mg) and reduced wound index confirmed enhanced collagen formation and rapid tissue regeneration. Histological analysis revealed well-organized collagen fibers and minimal inflammation, confirming the efficacy of the encapsulated Calendula-based hydrogel in promoting wound repair and dermal remodeling [165].
A comprehensive investigation on the wound healing properties of calendula flower extracts was conducted by applying them to artificially wounded cells (scratch test). Wells treated with the formulation containing calendula flower extracts exhibited a greater quantity of fibroblast cells in the scratched region compared to wells treated solely with medium and the placebo hydrogel sheet (Figure 4). Owing to its anti-inflammatory properties, C. officinalis enhances wound healing by promoting the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts at the wound site. In vivo tests demonstrated as well the advanced efficacy of alginate-based hydrogels containing calendula extracts. Following a 21-day treatment period, the animals exhibited a significant reduction in the duration of epithelialization and wound constriction. Enhanced epithelialization and neovascularization, comparable to normal skin, were observed in the treated groups relative to the control group [37].
Curcumin-loaded nanoemulsion-based hydrogels demonstrated superior in vivo wound-healing efficacy and enhanced suitability for transdermal delivery. Treatment with the nanoemulsion hydrogel resulted in a greater reduction in wound diameter after 14 days compared to curcumin gel and commercial formulations. Furthermore, accelerated re-epithelialization was observed as early as day 5 of therapy [166]. In a related investigation, Bhubhanil et al. demonstrated that GG/Curcumin-AgNPs hydrogels markedly improved wound repair compared with a commercial antibacterial gel. By days 12–16, inflammatory infiltration was drastically reduced and the extent of re-epithelialization and collagen deposition increased substantially [150]. Likewise, in a full-thickness infected wound model, a 2.5% Curcumin–CS–gelatin nanoparticle hydrogel achieved almost complete closure (~93%) by day 11, while vaseline-treated controls remained largely unhealed. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed a seven-fold rise in the M2/M1 macrophage polarization ratio (7.17 ± 2.18) and significant enhancement of angiogenesis, reflected by elevated densities of α-SMA-positive arterioles (~202 mm−2) and vWF-positive vessels (~261 mm−2) [167]. Additionally, curcumin loaded into PVA-CS-SA hydrogels exhibited superior efficacy in the treatment of diabetic chronic wounds. These hydrogels significantly enhanced human skin fibroblast migration—approximately 13.5-fold within 24 h—indicating a strong stimulatory effect on cellular migration (Figure 5). Similar patterns were observed in the case of Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) [168].
Extracts of CA have demonstrated pronounced regenerative capacity. In vitro experiments revealed a marked rise in scratch-closure and cell-migration rates—from 73.75% to 99.56% within 24 h—and a 1.7-fold increase in type I collagen gene expression after 48 h, attributed to the triterpenoid compounds characteristic of CA [111]. Consistent in vivo results showed faster wound contraction within 10 days, together with enhanced neovascularization, increased epithelial thickness, newly formed hair follicles, and improved collagen deposition [78]. Collectively, these findings indicate that CA-enriched hydrogels effectively modulate inflammation and provide a microenvironment conducive to tissue regeneration.
Hydrogels containing chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) extract also yielded notable outcomes, achieving approximately 85% wound closure after 14 days of treatment and promoting angiogenesis and collagen synthesis. These bioactive dressings supported complete re-epithelialization and the regeneration of structurally intact skin [75].
In a different context, grape-seed extracts (4%) were used to produce a biocompatible hydrogel composed of calcium silicate nanowires and SA for the treatment of melanoma tumors developed in Balb/c mice. By day 15, the wound had nearly healed without any signs of tumor recurrence. The grape extracts induced superior and regulated photothermal properties under NIR irradiation, hence improving the destruction of melanoma cells [169].
Advanced wound-healing performance has also been reported for HP (St John’s wort) extracts. When macerated extracts of HP were encapsulated within PLGA- and polylactic acid (PLA)-based nanoparticle–hydrogel formulations to enhance wound healing efficacy. In vivo studies using a full-thickness excisional wound model (male New Zealand rabbits) revealed significantly accelerated wound contraction, re-epithelialization, and collagen deposition in treated groups compared with controls. The formulation containing HP macerated in Nigella sativa oil showed the most pronounced healing effect. Histological analyses confirmed improved tissue regeneration without signs of irritation, underscoring the biocompatibility of the formulation. Overall, these findings demonstrate the strong therapeutic potential of nanoparticle-loaded HP hydrogels for enhanced wound repair [170]. Similarly, liposomal HP macerate incorporated into a hydrogel matrix has been shown to have superior wound healing scores on days 4, 8, and 12 of treatment. Histological analysis revealed increased epithelialization, denser collagen deposition, and comparable angiogenesis. Immunohistochemical examination indicated enhanced epithelial and vascular regeneration [41]. Furthermore, a bioactive hydrogel for wound healing was created by integrating HA callus extract into a PVA/CS/SA hydrogel. In vitro, the hydrogel exhibited superior cytocompatibility with human fibroblasts, promoting cell attachment and proliferation while suppressing microbial growth, including antibiotic-resistant strains. In vivo, by using a full-thickness murine wound model, the HP-loaded hydrogels markedly accelerated wound closure and re-epithelialization, facilitating angiogenesis and collagen deposition. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations demonstrated significant decreases in inflammatory infiltration and fibrosis-associated markers, indicating that the formulation not only accelerates healing but also reduces excessive scar formation. These results highlight the therapeutic potential of HP-based hydrogels as advanced wound dressings that provide antibacterial protection, facilitate tissue regeneration, and inhibit fibrosis within a single biocompatible formulation [94].
Table 3. Non-standardized natural and bee-derived extracts in hydrogel-based wound dressings.
Table 3. Non-standardized natural and bee-derived extracts in hydrogel-based wound dressings.
Natural AgentsType of
Extraction
Polymeric
Composition
Therapeutic/Biological Effects
Aloe veraFresh leaves
(crude gel) [171]
0.7% PVAEnhances fibroblast proliferation; Exhibits strong wound healing potential.
Fresh leaves [101]3% PVAAccelerated wound closure; Improves re-epithelialization and reduces inflammation.
Fresh leaves [172]2% SF/2% PVPEnhances cellular proliferation and migration; Reduces inflammation; Promotes granulation tissue formation and accelerated re-epithelialization.
Fresh leaves [96]8% PVA–2% CSNon-cytotoxic; Exhibits antibacterial activity and
excellent wound dressing potential.
Fresh leaves [173]12% PAN–1% TGSignificantly increases fibroblast viability; Demonstrates excellent cytocompatibility
Calendula
officinalis
(Marigold)
Macerated extract
[69]
7.2% AAm–0.5% MCPromotes tissue regeneration and accelerates the healing process.
Commercial
Extract [102]
2% CMC–5%PVAMinimizes apoptosis in human dermal fibroblasts;
Exhibits antimicrobial efficacy against S. aureus and E. coli.
Centella
asiatica
Macerated extract 95% EtOH [103]8% PVA–5% PEGNon-irritant and biocompatible; Accelerates wound contraction and epithelialization; Promotes complete wound closure with thin epidermis formation by day 5.
ChamomileUltrasonic extract
(water/ethanol 3:1) [73]
1% TGExhibits antimicrobial activity (80% of E. coli, 90% of S. aureus, and 92% of C. albicans); Demonstrates
anti-inflammatory and skin-protective potential.
Fresh leaves
[72]
15% AA–5% Cold/ Hot StarchNon-cytotoxic (>70% cell viability); Promoted fibroblast proliferation and cell regeneration.
Ethanolic extract (50%) [174]3% CS–2% AgaroseAntibacterial activity (inhibition zones: E. coli 7.5 mm, S. aureus 12.7 mm); Supports NIH 3T3 fibroblast adhesion, proliferation (~94% viability at day 7); Bioactive flavonoids and tannins contribute to antioxidant and wound-healing activity.
Ethanolic extract (70%) [75]12% PAN–2% SA–
2% Gelatin
Antibacterial activity (23 ± 1 mm S. aureus, 12 ± 2 mm E. coli); Cytocompatible (>100% L929 viability); Enhances angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and wound closure (~85% after 28 days); Reduces inflammation and necrosis.
Curcumin (Curcuma longa) Aqueous extract [175](1–2.5)% CS–5% PAAM Enhances antibacterial efficiency and biocompatibility; Curcuminoids contribute to anti-inflammatory and wound-healing activity via microbial inhibition and tissue regeneration.
Green TeaFresh leaves
[128]
3% CS–10% PVADemonstrates concentration-dependent antioxidant activity (DPPH scavenging 20–80%; ABTS scavenging 2–50%).
Fresh leaves
[82]
2% CS–10% PVAAntibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus; Non-cytotoxicity (L929 viability >70%); Promotes wound closure (~98–99% by day 12); Reduces inflammation and
enhanced re-epithelialization.
Neem
(Azadirachta
indica)
Fresh leaves
[104]
2% CS Exhibits antibacterial activity against S. aureus; Enhances wound healing efficiency; Displays anti-inflammatory
effects and promotes a moist wound environment.
Fresh leaves
[25]
1.25% GG–0.75% SFDemonstrates moderate antibacterial activity (26.5 ± 0.9 mm inhibition zone); Free of microbial contamination

4.2. Synergistic Effects of Natural Extracts in Hydrogel-Based Wound Dressings

Beyond the action of single bioactive components, numerous studies have explored the incorporation of multiple natural extracts into hydrogel matrices to exploit their synergistic therapeutic potential. Such combinations often result in amplified antibacterial, antioxidant, and regenerative activities, reflecting a complementary or additive interaction among phytochemical constituents and leading to improved wound-healing performance.
Hydrogels containing both Aloe vera and honey exhibited excellent in vitro biocompatibility, characterized by high fibroblast viability and minimal cytotoxicity in MTT assays. The combined natural compounds effectively reduced haemolysis and markedly enhanced fibroblast adhesion and proliferation after 5 days of incubation, indicating robust cell–matrix interactions that support tissue regeneration [105]. Likewise, the integration of Aloe vera and honey within a PVA hydrogel network produced complementary biological effects, minimizing erythrocyte damage while promoting matrix formation and early tissue regeneration (Figure 6). The synergistic interplay between Aloe vera acemannan polysaccharides and honey-derived anti-inflammatory and antibacterial compounds enhanced fibroblast activity and collagen deposition, resulting in a dual therapeutic action that accelerates and optimizes wound healing [89].
An Alginate-gelatin hydrogel co-loaded with nanosilver, Aloe vera, curcumin, and Calendula officinalis extract demonstrated significant in vitro synergy, achieving approximately 98% artificial wound closure through enhanced migration and proliferation of V79 fibroblast cell [176]. Similarly, the combined incorporation of Aloe vera and Curcuma longa extracts into a gelatin–PEG–CS matrix resulted in superior in vitro and in vivo healing responses compared with single-extract or unloaded systems. The dual-extract hydrogel promoted higher dermal cell proliferation and viability, while in rat wound models, nearly complete wound closure was achieved within ten days, accompanied by rapid contraction and re-epithelialization. The combined antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of acemannan and curcumin stimulated fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis, confirming the synergistic therapeutic efficacy of these dual-extract hydrogels in accelerating tissue regeneration [133].
In a complementary study, the co-administration of Aloe vera extract with adipose-derived stem cells within a hydrogel framework achieved outstanding results in a rat burn model, attaining 99.4% wound closure by day 14 without visible inflammation or erythema. The treatment significantly down-regulated IL-1β while up-regulating TGF-β1 expression during the mid-healing phase, indicating balanced inflammatory modulation and tissue remodelling. Histological observations revealed accelerated re-epithelialization, abundant fibroblast proliferation, and extensive neovascularization, highlighting the synergistic interaction between Aloe vera bioactives and stem-cell-derived factors in promoting well-organized dermal regeneration [177]. Further evidence of synergistic enhancement was provided by hydrogel patches composed of Pluronic micelles loaded with acemannan and curcumin (2:1 ratio). The dual-loaded system exhibited improved in vivo wound contraction, stimulated early hair growth (day 10 post-injury), reduced local inflammation and granulation, and accelerated epidermal regeneration during the intermediate healing phase (days 4–8) [178].
In another formulation, curcumin-loaded, heparin-grafted PLGA nanofiber membranes (PCH NFMs) significantly increased α-SMA expression (17.4 ± 4.0%), as shown by histological and immunohistochemical analyses, indicating enhanced myofibroblast differentiation and early neovascularization. The improved healing response was attributed to the synergistic effect of curcumin’s anti-inflammatory activity and the heparin-mediated stabilization of growth factors (TGF-β1 and FGF-2), which collectively promoted angiogenesis, fibroblast activation, and accelerated tissue remodelling [179].
Additional synergistic outcomes were observed in in vitro assays of Gantrez® S-97/xyloglucan hydrogel patches co-loaded with Dioscorea bulbifera extract and honey. At a concentration of 1 mg mL−1, the formulation exhibited high fibroblast viability and pronounced migratory stimulation. Scratch tests showed that both honey-loaded and unloaded hydrogels accelerated fibroblast migration within 24 h, whereas the dual-loaded Gantrez® S-97/xyloglucan patches produced the most substantial enhancement after 48 h. After 72 h, the percentage of scratch-area recovery confirmed the potentiating effects of honey and D. bulbifera phytochemicals on fibroblast motility and proliferation [131].
Moreover, dual-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier hydrogels containing CA extract and azelaic acid, developed by Lacatusu et al., exhibited faster and more potent anti-inflammatory response than either single-component system or a commercial reference formulation. The enhanced activity was ascribed to the synergistic interplay among calendula flavonoids, azelaic acid, and ω-3/ω-6 fatty acids, which collectively suppressed proinflammatory cytokine release, modulated oxidative stress, and promoted tissue repair [180].
Overall, comparative evaluation of the studies summarized in this section indicates that Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, Calendula officinalis, and Curcuma longa consistently achieve the strongest regenerative responses, including faster re-epithelialization, enhanced collagen deposition, and attenuated inflammation across multiple in vitro and in vivo models. Other extracts, such as neem, chamomile, grape seed, green tea, and Hypericum perforatum, exhibit pronounced antimicrobial, antioxidant, or anti-inflammatory actions, though their performance is more sensitive to extraction method, standardization level, and formulation stability. Across all systems, key translational barriers remain related to batch variability, phytochemical instability, and the limited availability of robust clinical data, emphasizing the need for improved extract standardization and scalable manufacturing pathways.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Natural therapeutic extracts incorporated into hydrogel dressings demonstrate significant potential for improving wound healing owing to their multifunctional biological properties. Aloe vera, Calendula officinalis (Marigold), Curcuma longa (Turmeric), Centella asiatica, Matricaria chamomilla L. (Chamomile), Azadirachta indica (Neem), Camellia sinensis (Green tea), Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s Wort), honey, and bee-derived products represent the most widely studied natural ingredients capable of accelerating tissue regeneration, collagen synthesis, and re-epithelialization.
The extraction and purification of natural therapeutic extracts are critical for preserving their stability and bioactivity when incorporated into hydrogel wound dressings. Each extract has a unique chemical profile; thus, the selected extraction procedure must optimize yield while preserving biological functionality. Likewise, selecting a suitable incorporation strategy, whether direct mixing, in situ gelation, post-loading, or nanoencapsulation depends on the properties of both the bioactive compound and the hydrogel system. Standardizing these processes ensures reproducibility and consistent therapeutic performance in natural-extract-loaded hydrogels for wound healing. Comprehensive, rational design that combines optimum extraction–purification processes with appropriate incorporation techniques guarantees superior biocompatibility and improved wound-healing efficacy of natural-agent-loaded hydrogels.
The in vitro and in vivo results demonstrate that hydrogels loaded with natural therapeutic extracts markedly enhance wound healing through multifactorial pathways, surpassing the efficacy of unloaded or commercially available formulations. Among the most prominent examples, Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, Calendula officinalis, and Curcuma longa extracts significantly facilitate near-complete re-epithelialization within two to three weeks. Formulation of curcumin and Hypericum perforatum further demonstrated improved vascularization and reduced inflammation, leading to regenerative outcomes with minimal scarring. Similarly, Chamomile, Grape seed, and Neem extracts provided antimicrobial protection and reduced oxidative stress, essential for chronic and infected wound models. The integration of multiple natural therapeutic agents offers a powerful, synergetic approach to wound management, enabling the design of multifunctional hydrogels that simultaneously modulate inflammation, prevent infection, and accelerate tissue regeneration.
Future research should focus on the systematic optimization of extract ratios, release kinetics, and pathway correlations using biological profiling to fully exploit the synergistic healing potential of natural extracts in advanced hydrogel dressings. Consequently, the incorporation of different biopolymer compositions, innovative crosslinking strategies, and natural type extracts enables the design of next-generation hydrogels that simultaneously accelerate healing, prevent infection, and reduce fibrosis in acute and chronic wound environments. In addition to optimizing formulation parameters, future perspectives must address the requirements for large-scale production and safe clinical deployment of natural-extract-loaded hydrogel dressings. Ensuring batch-to-batch reproducibility, standardized extraction and purification protocols, and scalable hydrogel fabrication methods is essential for industrial translation. Furthermore, rigorous validation of sterility, biocompatibility, long-term stability, and controlled release behavior is imperative. Establishing robust quality control frameworks and safety assessments will facilitate the successful transition of these bioactive hydrogels from laboratory research to routine clinical wound-care applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.C.C., A.S. and M.D.; methodology, I.C.C., A.S. and M.D.; software, I.C.C.; validation, E.M. and G.C.; resources, I.C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, I.C.C., A.S. and M.D.; writing—review and editing, I.C.C., A.S. and M.D.; visualization, E.M. and G.C.; supervision, M.D.; project administration, I.C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS–UEFISCDI, project number PN-IV-P2-2.1-TE-2023-0453, within PNCDI IV, as well as from the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research under the Romanian National Core Program LAPLAS VII–Contract no. 30N/2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the National Interest Infrastructure Facility, IOSIN CETAL, at INFLPR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
5-FU5-Fluorouracil
AAAcrylic acid
AAmAcrylamide
AMPSAcrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid
BCBacterial cellulose
CACentella asiatica
CMCCarboxymethylcellulose
COLCollagen
CSChitosan
DMAN,N-Dimethylacrylamide
DXSDextran sulfate
EGDMA
EtOH
Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
Ethyl alcohol
GelMAGelatin methacryloyl
GGGuar gum
GlyGlycerol
GOGraphene oxide
HAHyaluronic acid
HECHydroxyethylcellulose
HPHypericum perforatum L.
HPMCHydroxypropyl methylcellulose
HUVECsHuman umbilical vein endothelial cells
MAAnMethacrylic anhydride
MC
MeOH
Methylcellulose
Methyl alcohol
NIPAMN-Isopropylacrylamide
PAAMPolyacrylamide
PANPolyacrylonitrile
PCLPoly-ε-caprolactone
PDMAPoly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide)
PEGPoly(ethylene glycol)
PEOPolyethylene oxide
PGPropylene glycol
PLAPolylactic acid
PLGAPoly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
PVAPolyvinyl alcohol
PVPPolyvinylpyrrolidone
QCSQuaternary aminated chitosan
SASodium alginate
SFSilk fibroin
TEATriethanolamine
TGTragacanth
TOCNTEMPO oxidized cellulose nanofiber
XGXanthan gum
κ-CAR Carrageenan

References

  1. Cristea (Hohotă), A.-G.; Lisă, E.-L.; Iacob (Ciobotaru), S.; Dragostin, I.; Ștefan, C.S.; Fulga, I.; Anghel (Ștefan), A.M.; Dragan, M.; Morariu, I.D.; Dragostin, O.-M. Antimicrobial Smart Dressings for Combating Antibiotic Resistance in Wound Care. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Herman, A.; Leska, A.; Wińska, P.; Herman, A.P. Plant Extracts as Modulators of the Wound Healing Process—Preliminary Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xie, Y.; Gao, P.; He, F.; Zhang, C. Application of Alginate-Based Hydrogels in Hemostasis. Gels 2022, 8, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vitale, S.; Colanero, S.; Placidi, M.; Di Emidio, G.; Tatone, C.; Amicarelli, F.; D’Alessandro, A.M. Phytochemistry and Biological Activity of Medicinal Plants in Wound Healing: An Overview of Current Research. Molecules 2022, 27, 3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Revete, A.; Aparicio, A.; Cisterna, B.A.; Revete, J.; Luis, L.; Ibarra, E.; Segura González, E.A.; Molino, J.; Reginensi, D. Advancements in the Use of Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine: Properties and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biomater. 2022, 2022, 3606765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kucinska-Lipka, J.; Gubanska, I.; Lewandowska, A.; Terebieniec, A.; Przybytek, A.; Cieśliński, H. Antibacterial Polyurethanes, Modified with Cinnamaldehyde, as Potential Materials for Fabrication of Wound Dressings. Polym. Bull. 2019, 76, 2725–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi, S.A. Alginate Based Hemostatic Materials for Bleeding Management: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 274, 133218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lopes, A.I.; Pintado, M.M.; Tavaria, F.K. Plant-Based Films and Hydrogels for Wound Healing. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lyggitsou, G.; Barda, C.; Anagnostou, M.; Douros, A.; Statha, D.; Karampasi, C.; Papantonaki, A.I.; Svoliantopoulos, I.; Sfiniadakis, I.; Vitsos, A.; et al. Wound Healing Potential of Herbal Hydrogel Formulations of Cedrus Brevifolia Extracts in Mice. Gels 2024, 10, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gutterman, Y.; Chauser-Volfson, E. The Distribution of the Phenolic Metabolites Barbaloin, Aloeresin and Aloenin as a Peripheral Defense Strategy in the Succulent Leaf Parts of Aloe arborescens. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2000, 28, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamman, J.H. Composition and Applications of Aloe vera Leaf Gel. Molecules 2008, 13, 1599–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hutter, J.A.; Salman, M.; Stavinoha, W.B.; Satsangi, N.; Williams, R.F.; Streeper, R.T.; Weintraub, S.T. Antiinflammatory C-Glucosyl Chromone from Aloe barbadensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 541–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maan, A.A.; Nazir, A.; Khan, M.K.I.; Ahmad, T.; Zia, R.; Murid, M.; Abrar, M. The Therapeutic Properties and Applications of Aloe vera: A Review. J. Herb. Med. 2018, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, C.; Cui, Y.; Pi, F.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Qian, H. Extraction, Purification, Structural Characteristics, Biological Activities and Pharmacological Applications of Acemannan, a Polysaccharide from Aloe vera: A Review. Molecules 2019, 24, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gupta, A.; Singh, R.L.; Raghubir, R. Antioxidant Status during Cutaneous Wound Healing in Immunocompromised Rats. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2002, 241, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arafa, N.M.S.; Hummadi, H.M.A.; Badr, G.M. The Potential of Aloe vera Gel Utilization for Skin Wound Healing in Rats Based on GC–MS and HPLC Chemical Profile. J. Basic Appl. Zool. 2025, 86, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meza-Valle, K.Z.; Saucedo-Acuña, R.A.; Tovar-Carrillo, K.L.; Cuevas-González, J.C.; Zaragoza-Contreras, E.A.; Melgoza-Lozano, J. Characterization and Topical Study of Aloe vera Hydrogel on Wound-Healing Process. Polymers 2021, 13, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Movaffagh, J.; Khatib, M.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S.; Taherzadeh, Z.; Hashemi, M.; Seyedian Moghaddam, A.; Tabatabaee, S.A.; Azizzadeh, M.; Jirofti, N. Evaluation of Wound-Healing Efficiency of a Functional Chitosan/Aloe vera Hydrogel on the Improvement of Re-Epithelialization in Full Thickness Wound Model of Rat. J. Tissue Viability 2022, 31, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kotha, R.R.; Luthria, D.L. Curcumin: Biological, Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, and Analytical Aspects. Molecules 2019, 24, 2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kant, V.; Gopal, A.; Kumar, D.; Pathak, N.N.; Ram, M.; Jangir, B.L.; Tandan, S.K.; Kumar, D. Curcumin-Induced Angiogenesis Hastens Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. J. Surg. Res. 2015, 193, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yen, Y.; Pu, C.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liang, C.; Hsieh, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y. Curcumin Accelerates Cutaneous Wound Healing via Multiple Biological Actions: The Involvement of TNF-α, MMP-9, A-SMA, and Collagen. Int. Wound J. 2018, 15, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dai, M.; Zheng, X.; Xu, X.; Kong, X.; Li, X.; Guo, G.; Luo, F.; Zhao, X.; Wei, Y.; Qian, Z. Chitosan-Alginate Sponge: Preparation and Application in Curcumin Delivery for Dermal Wound Healing in Rat. BioMed Res. Int. 2009, 2009, 595126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chundran, N.K.; Husen, I.R.; Rubianti, I. Effect of Neem Leaves Extract (Azadirachta indica) on Wound Healing. Althea Med. J. 2015, 2, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olorunsola, R.A.; Oke, F.; Bagbe, A.S.; Ayeyinbo, O.A. Evaluation of Wound Healing Potentials of Neem (Azadirachtaindica) Leaf Extract on Excision Wounds in Wistar Albino Rats. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 2020, 45, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nasrine, A.; Narayana, S.; Gulzar Ahmed, M.; Sultana, R.; Noushida, N.; Raunak Salian, T.; Almuqbil, M.; Almadani, M.E.; Alshehri, A.; Alghamdi, A.; et al. Neem (Azadirachta indica) and Silk Fibroin Associated Hydrogel: Boon for Wound Healing Treatment Regimen. Saudi Pharm. J. 2023, 31, 101749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Leung, L.K.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, R. Theaflavins in Black Tea and Catechins in Green Tea Are Equally Effective Antioxidants. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 2248–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reygaert, W.C. The Antimicrobial Possibilities of Green Tea. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, S.; Lee, K.-W. Protective Effect of (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate against Advanced Glycation Endproducts-Induced Injury in Neuronal Cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 1369–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Kwon, B.J.; Lee, M.H.; Han, D.; Hyon, S.; Park, J. Promotion of Full-Thickness Wound Healing Using Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate/Poly (Lactic-CO-GLycolic Acid) Membrane as Temporary Wound Dressing. Artif. Organs 2014, 38, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chandrika, U.G.; Prasad Kumara, P.A.A.S. Chapter Four—Gotu Kola (Centella asiatica): Nutritional Properties and Plausible Health Benefits. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 76, pp. 125–157. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ratz-lyko, A.; Arct, J.; Pytkowska, K. Moisturizing and Antiinflammatory Properties of Cosmetic Formulations Containing Centella asiatica Extract. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 78, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hamid, A.A.; Shah, Z.M.; Muse, R.; Mohamed, S. Characterisation of Antioxidative Activities of Various Extracts of Centella asiatica (L) Urban. Food Chem. 2002, 77, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Witkowska, K.; Paczkowska-Walendowska, M.; Garbiec, E.; Cielecka-Piontek, J. Topical Application of Centella asiatica in Wound Healing: Recent Insights into Mechanisms and Clinical Efficacy. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Witkowska, K.; Paczkowska-Walendowska, M.; Plech, T.; Szymanowska, D.; Michniak-Kohn, B.; Cielecka-Piontek, J. Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Controlled Delivery of Asiaticoside-Rich Centella asiatica Extracts with Wound Healing Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Witkowska, K.; Paczkowska-Walendowska, M.; Miklaszewski, A.; Plech, T.; Michniak-Kohn, B.; Swora-Cwynar, E.; Cielecka-Piontek, J. Development of 3D-Printed Chitosan-Based Hydrogels Rich in Centella asiatica Extract for Enhanced Wound Healing Applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 111, 107143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cruceriu, D.; Balacescu, O.; Rakosy, E. Calendula officinalis: Potential Roles in Cancer Treatment and Palliative Care. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 1068–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rathod, L.; Bhowmick, S.; Patel, P.; Sawant, K. Calendula Flower Extract Loaded PVA Hydrogel Sheet for Wound Management: Optimization, Characterization and in-Vivo Study. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 68, 103035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martins, M.D.; Marques, M.M.; Bussadori, S.K.; Martins, M.A.T.; Pavesi, V.C.S.; Mesquita-Ferrari, R.A.; Fernandes, K.P.S. Comparative Analysis between Chamomilla recutita and Corticosteroids on Wound Healing. An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Salehi, H.; Mehrasa, M.; Nasri-Nasrabadi, B.; Doostmohammadi, M.; Seyedebrahimi, R.; Davari, N.; Rafienia, M.; Hosseinabadi, M.E.; Agheb, M.; Siavash, M. Effects of Nanozeolite/Starch Thermoplastic Hydrogels on Wound Healing. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017, 22, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yadollah-Damavandi, S.; Chavoshi-Nejad, M.; Jangholi, E.; Nekouyian, N.; Hosseini, S.; Seifaee, A.; Rafiee, S.; Karimi, H.; Ashkani-Esfahani, S.; Parsa, Y.; et al. Topical Hypericum perforatum Improves Tissue Regeneration in Full-Thickness Excisional Wounds in Diabetic Rat Model. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 245328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kurt, A.A.; Ibrahim, B.; Çınar, H.; Atsü, A.N.; Bursalıoğlu, E.O.; Bayır, İ.; Özmen, Ö.; Aslan, İ. Nanoemulsion Hydrogel Delivery System of Hypericum perforatum L.: In Silico Design, In Vitro Antimicrobial–Toxicological Profiling, and In Vivo Wound-Healing Evaluation. Gels 2025, 11, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ahmad, P.; Jaleel, C.A.; Salem, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Sharma, S. Roles of Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidants in Plants during Abiotic Stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2010, 30, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mandal, M.D.; Mandal, S. Honey: Its Medicinal Property and Antibacterial Activity. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2011, 1, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Abd Jalil, M.A.; Kasmuri, A.R.; Hadi, H. Stingless Bee Honey, the Natural Wound Healer: A Review. Skin. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2017, 30, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Rajput, M.; Barui, A.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Pal, N.K.; Chatterjee, J.; Mukherjee, R. Dual Cross-Linked Honey Coupled 3D Antimicrobial Alginate Hydrogels for Cutaneous Wound Healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 116, 111218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. El-Kased, R.F.; Amer, R.I.; Attia, D.; Elmazar, M.M. Honey-Based Hydrogel: In Vitro and Comparative In Vivo Evaluation for Burn Wound Healing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rajesh, A.; Lone, S.A.; Ramasubburayan, R.; Sikkanthar, S.; Thajuddin, N.; Lee, S.-Y.; Kim, J.-W.; MubarakAli, D. A Systemic Review on Aloe vera Derived Natural Biomaterials for Wound Healing Applications. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 54, 102910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumari, A.; Raina, N.; Wahi, A.; Goh, K.W.; Sharma, P.; Nagpal, R.; Jain, A.; Ming, L.C.; Gupta, M. Wound-Healing Effects of Curcumin and Its Nanoformulations: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cedillo-Cortezano, M.; Martinez-Cuevas, L.R.; López, J.A.M.; Barrera López, I.L.; Escutia-Perez, S.; Petricevich, V.L. Use of Medicinal Plants in the Process of Wound Healing: A Literature Review. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mssillou, I.; Bakour, M.; Slighoua, M.; Laaroussi, H.; Saghrouchni, H.; Ez-Zahra Amrati, F.; Lyoussi, B.; Derwich, E. Investigation on Wound Healing Effect of Mediterranean Medicinal Plants and Some Related Phenolic Compounds: A Review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 298, 115663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Diniz, L.R.L.; Calado, L.L.; Duarte, A.B.S.; de Sousa, D.P. Centella asiatica and Its Metabolite Asiatic Acid: Wound Healing Effects and Therapeutic Potential. Metabolites 2023, 13, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ejiohuo, O.; Folami, S.; Maigoro, A.Y. Calendula in Modern Medicine: Advancements in Wound Healing and Drug Delivery Applications. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Rep. 2024, 12, 100199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dai, Y.-L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Niu, F.-J.; Li, K.-W.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, C.-Z.; Gao, L.-N. Chamomile: A Review of Its Traditional Uses, Chemical Constituents, Pharmacological Activities and Quality Control Studies. Molecules 2022, 28, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. El-Sakhawy, M.; Salama, A.; Tohamy, H.-A.S. Applications of Propolis-Based Materials in Wound Healing. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2023, 316, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jasso de Rodríguez, D.; Hernández-Castillo, D.; Rodríguez-García, R.; Angulo-Sánchez, J.L. Antifungal Activity In Vitro of Aloe vera Pulp and Liquid Fraction against Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Ind. Crops Prod. 2005, 21, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Noori, A.S.; Mageed, N.F.; Abdalameer, N.K.; Mohammed, M.K.A.; Mazhir, S.N.; Ali, A.H.; Jaber, N.A.; Mohammed, S.H. The Histological Effect of Activated Aloe vera Extract by Microwave Plasma on Wound Healing. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 807, 140112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, S.; Asnin, L.; Assefa, A.D.; Ko, E.Y.; Sharma, K.; Park, S.W. Extraction of Antioxidants from Aloe vera Leaf Gel: A Response Surface Methodology Study. Food Anal. Methods 2014, 7, 1804–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Maneechan, W.; Khumfu, P.; Charoensit, P.; Tuanchai, A.; Ross, S.; Ross, G.M.; Ngoenkam, J.; Viyoch, J. Bioactive Hydrogel Scaffolds Integrating Chitosan, Silk Fibroin, and Aloe vera Extract for Enhanced Cartilage Tissue Regeneration. Polymers 2025, 17, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jales, S.T.L.; Barbosa, R.d.M.; de Albuquerque, A.C.; Duarte, L.H.V.; da Silva, G.R.; Meirelles, L.M.A.; da Silva, T.M.S.; Alves, A.F.; Viseras, C.; Raffin, F.N.; et al. Development and Characterization of Aloe vera Mucilaginous-Based Hydrogels for Psoriasis Treatment. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bashipour, F.; Ghoreishi, S.M. Response Surface Optimization of Supercritical CO2 Extraction of α-Tocopherol from Gel and Skin of Aloe vera and Almond Leaves. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 95, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rodrigues, C.L.; Tomoda, B.T.; Viganó, J.; Braga, A.R.C.; de Moraes, M.A.; Veggi, P.C. Production and Characterization of Silk Fibroin–Aloe vera Hydrogel: A Study on Extraction, Hydrogel Properties, and Release Mechanism. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 50515–50525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bashipour, F.; Ghoreishi, S.M. Experimental Optimization of Supercritical Extraction of β-Carotene from Aloe barbadensis Miller via Genetic Algorithm. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 72, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hu, Q.; Hu, Y.; Xu, J. Free Radical-Scavenging Activity of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) Extracts by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ivanovic, J.; Zizovic, I.; Petrovic, S.; Skala, D. The Analysis of Different Processes of Extraction: Yield of Extracts Obtained from Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) and Sweet Bay (Laurus nobilis L.) and the Exergy Analysis of Applied Processes. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 2009, 15, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tanaka, M.; Yamada, M.; Toida, T.; Iwatsuki, K. Safety Evaluation of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extract of Aloe vera Gel. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, T2–T9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Malavika, J.P.; Shobana, C.; Ragupathi, M.; Kumar, P.; Lee, Y.S.; Govarthanan, M.; Selvan, R.K. A Sustainable Green Synthesis of Functionalized Biocompatible Carbon Quantum Dots from Aloe barbadensis Miller and Its Multifunctional Applications. Environ. Res. 2021, 200, 111414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dinda, M.; Mazumdar, S.; Das, S.; Ganguly, D.; Dasgupta, U.B.; Dutta, A.; Jana, K.; Karmakar, P. The Water Fraction of Calendula officinalis Hydroethanol Extract Stimulates In Vitro and In Vivo Proliferation of Dermal Fibroblasts in Wound Healing. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1696–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gavan, A.; Colobatiu, L.; Hanganu, D.; Bogdan, C.; Olah, N.; Achim, M.; Mirel, S. Development and Evaluation of Hydrogel Wound Dressings Loaded with Herbal Extracts. Processes 2022, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ferreira, L.M.d.M.C.; Bandeira, E.d.S.; Gomes, M.F.; Lynch, D.G.; Bastos, G.N.T.; Silva-Júnior, J.O.C.; Ribeiro-Costa, R.M. Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Containing Calendula Extract as a Wound Healing Bandage: In Vivo Test. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Possa, G.d.O.K.; Chopek, S.; Pereira, A.V.; Koga, A.Y.; Oliveira, M.R.P.d.; Costa, M.D.M. Calendula Glycolic Extract Enhances Wound Healing of Alginate Hydrogel. Acta Cir. Bras. 2024, 39, e399724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nicolaus, C.; Junghanns, S.; Hartmann, A.; Murillo, R.; Ganzera, M.; Merfort, I. In Vitro Studies to Evaluate the Wound Healing Properties of Calendula officinalis Extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 196, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jamroży, M.; Głąb, M.; Kudłacik-Kramarczyk, S.; Drabczyk, A.; Gajda, P.; Tyliszczak, B. The Impact of the Matricaria chamomilla L. Extract, Starch Solution and the Photoinitiator on Physiochemical Properties of Acrylic Hydrogels. Materials 2022, 15, 2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ghayempour, S.; Montazer, M. A Robust Friendly Nano-Encapsulated Plant Extract in Hydrogel Tragacanth Gum on Cotton Fabric through One Single Step in-Situ Synthesis and Fabrication. Cellulose 2016, 23, 2561–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sellappan, L.K.; Sanmugam, A.; Manoharan, S. Fabrication of Dual Layered Biocompatible Herbal Biopatch from Biological Waste for Skin—Tissue Regenerative Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Moshfeghi, T.; Najmoddin, N.; Arkan, E.; Hosseinzadeh, L. A Multifunctional Polyacrylonitrile Fibers/Alginate-Based Hydrogel Loaded with Chamomile Extract and Silver Sulfadiazine for Full-Thickness Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Azis, H.A.; Taher, M.; Ahmed, A.S.; Sulaiman, W.M.A.W.; Susanti, D.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Zakaria, Z.A. In Vitro and In Vivo Wound Healing Studies of Methanolic Fraction of Centella asiatica Extract. South Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kulawik-Pióro, A.; Osak, E.; Mendrycka, M.; Trześniewska-Ofiara, Z. Bigels as Novel Systems for the Delivery Active Compounds from Centella asiatica. Soft Mater. 2023, 21, 316–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Song, A.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Chang, W.; Tian, B.; Xu, J.; Dai, H.; Ma, Q.; et al. A Printable Hydrogel Loaded with Medicinal Plant Extract for Promoting Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, e2303017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Elgamily, H.M.; Safwat, E.M.; Youssef, A.M. Development of a Novel Agarose/Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Grape Seed Extract Hydrogel for Biomimetic Remineralization of Demineralized Human Enamel (An In-Vitro Study). Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 26086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Morales, C.; Roeckel, M.; Fernández, K. Microscopic Modeling of País Grape Seed Extract Absorption in the Small Intestine. AAPS PharmSciTech 2014, 15, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Priya; Sharma, A.K.; Kaith, B.S.; Arora, S.; Simran; Bhagyashree. Synthesis of Gelatin and Green Tea Based Stretchable Self-Healing Material of Biomedical Importance. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 172, 105188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Aldakheel, F.; Mohsen, D.; El Sayed, M.; Alawam, K.; Binshaya, A.; Alduraywish, S. Silver Nanoparticles Loaded on Chitosan-g-PVA Hydrogel for the Wound-Healing Applications. Molecules 2023, 28, 3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jena, A.; Sahoo, N.K.; Sahoo, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Rout, P.R.; Zhong, Y. Design of a Novel Green Synthesized ZVS/S-RGO -Deinococcus radiodurans R1 Chitosan Hydrogel Beads for Enhanced Recovery of Europium. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 503, 145367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ravindra, S.; Murali Mohan, Y.; Narayana Reddy, N.; Mohana Raju, K. Fabrication of Antibacterial Cotton Fibres Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles via “Green. Approach”. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 367, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pal, P.; Syed, S.S.; Banat, F. Soxhlet Extraction of Neem Pigment to Synthesize Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Its Catalytic and Adsorption Activity for Methylene Blue Removal. Bionanoscience 2017, 7, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Polaquini, S.R.B.; Svidzinski, T.I.E.; Kemmelmeier, C.; Gasparetto, A. Effect of Aqueous Extract from Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) on Hydrophobicity, Biofilm Formation and Adhesion in Composite Resin by Candida Albicans. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2006, 51, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Seriana, I.; Akmal, M.; Darusman, D.; Wahyuni, S.; Khairan, K.; Sugito, S. Neem Leaf (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) Ethanolic Extract on the Liver and Kidney Function of Rats. Sci. World J. 2021, 2021, 7970424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nowak, A.; Muzykiewicz-Szymańska, A.; Perużyńska, M.; Kucharska, E.; Kucharski, Ł.; Jakubczyk, K.; Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, P.; Stefanowicz-Hajduk, J.; Droździk, M.; Majtan, J. Assessment of In Vitro Skin Permeation and Accumulation of Phenolic Acids from Honey and Honey-Based Pharmaceutical Formulations. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2025, 25, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Wang, T.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Zhao, X. Preparation of Aloe Polysaccharide/Honey/PVA Composite Hydrogel: Antibacterial Activity and Promoting Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 211, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jansen-Alves, C.; Maia, D.S.V.; Krumreich, F.D.; Crizel-Cardoso, M.M.; Fioravante, J.B.; da Silva, W.P.; Borges, C.D.; Zambiazi, R.C. Propolis Microparticles Produced with Pea Protein: Characterization and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Amorim, J.D.P.; Nascimento, H.A.; Silva Junior, C.J.G.; Medeiros, A.D.M.; Silva, I.D.L.; Costa, A.F.S.; Vinhas, G.M.; Sarubbo, L.A. Obtainment of Bacterial Cellulose with Added Propolis Extract for Cosmetic Applications. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2022, 62, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ferreira, L.M.d.M.C.; Cruz, N.F.d.; Lynch, D.G.; Costa, P.F.d.; Salgado, C.G.; Silva-Júnior, J.O.C.; Rossi, A.; Ribeiro-Costa, R.M. Hydrogel Containing Propolis: Physical Characterization and Evaluation of Biological Activities for Potential Use in the Treatment of Skin Lesions. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jarzębski, M.; Smułek, W.; Baranowska, H.M.; Masewicz, Ł.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Ligaj, M.; Kaczorek, E. Characterization of St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) and the Impact of Filtration Process on Bioactive Extracts Incorporated into Carbohydrate-Based Hydrogels. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 104, 105748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zivari-Ghader, T.; Shokouhi, B.; Kosari-Nasab, M.; Davaran, S.; Hamishehkar, H.; Farahpour, M.R.; Rashidi, M.; Mehrali, M. Hypericum perforatum Callus Extract-Loaded Composite Hydrogel with Diverse Bioactivities for Enhanced Wound Healing and Fibrosis Prevention. Small 2024, 20, e2407112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zivari-Ghader, T.; Hamishehkar, H.; Shokouhi, B.; Kosari-Nasab, M.; Farahpour, M.R.; Memar, M.Y.; Davaran, S.; Hanaee, J.; Rashidi, M.-R.; Mehrali, M. Chitosan-Alginate Hydrogel Enriched with Hypericum perforatum Callus Extract for Improved Wound Healing and Scar Inhibition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 67344–67361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Alvandi, H.; Rajati, H.; Naseriyeh, T.; Rahmatabadi, S.S.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Arkan, E. Incorporation of Aloe vera and Green Synthesized ZnO Nanoparticles into the Chitosan/PVA Nanocomposite Hydrogel for Wound Dressing Application. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 4123–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Baniasadi, H. State-of-the-Art in Natural Hydrogel-Based Wound Dressings: Design, Functionalization, and Fabrication Approaches. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2025, 342, 103527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Luo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y. Modification and Crosslinking Strategies for Hyaluronic Acid-based Hydrogel Biomaterials. Smart Med. 2023, 2, e20230029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Luo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y. Tailoring Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2306554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hanif, W.; Hardiansyah, A.; Randy, A.; Asri, L.A.T.W. Physically Crosslinked PVA/Graphene-Based Materials/Aloe vera Hydrogel with Antibacterial Activity. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 29029–29041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kenawy, E.-R.; El-Meligy, M.A.; Ghaly, Z.S.; Kenawy, M.E.; Kamoun, E.A. Novel Physically-Crosslinked Caffeine and Vitamin C-Loaded PVA/Aloe vera Hydrogel Membranes for Topical Wound Healing: Synthesis, Characterization and In-Vivo Wound Healing Tests. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 2140–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Huang, W.-H.; Hung, C.-Y.; Chiang, P.-C.; Lee, H.; Lin, I.-T.; Lai, P.-C.; Chan, Y.-H.; Feng, S.-W. Physicochemical Characterization, Biocompatibility, and Antibacterial Properties of CMC/PVA/Calendula officinalis Films for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ahmed, A.S.; Taher, M.; Mandal, U.K.; Jaffri, J.M.; Susanti, D.; Mahmood, S.; Zakaria, Z.A. Pharmacological Properties of Centella asiatica Hydrogel in Accelerating Wound Healing in Rabbits. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Iqbal, Y.; Raouf Malik, A.; Iqbal, T.; Hammad Aziz, M.; Ahmed, F.; Abolaban, F.A.; Mansoor Ali, S.; Ullah, H. Green Synthesis of ZnO and Ag-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles Using Azadirachta indica Leaves: Characterization and Their Potential Antibacterial, Antidiabetic, and Wound-Healing Activities. Mater. Lett. 2021, 305, 130671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Saberian, M.; Seyedjafari, E.; Zargar, S.J.; Mahdavi, F.S.; Sanaei-rad, P. Fabrication and Characterization of Alginate/Chitosan Hydrogel Combined with Honey and Aloe vera for Wound Dressing Applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 51398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sabouri Moghadam, A.; Mirmohammad Meiguni, M.S.; Salami, M.; Askari, G.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Miran, M.; Buttar, H.S.; Brennan, C. Characterization of Physicochemical Properties of Mung Bean Protein Isolate and κ-Carrageenan Hydrogel as a Delivery System for Propolis Extract. Food Res. Int. 2024, 197, 115221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lu, P.; Ruan, D.; Huang, M.; Tian, M.; Zhu, K.; Gan, Z.; Xiao, Z. Harnessing the Potential of Hydrogels for Advanced Therapeutic Applications: Current Achievements and Future Directions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shanmugha Mary, A.; Mani, A.; Ghosh, S.; Rajaram, K. Phage Embedded Gelatin, Alginate and Gelatin/Alginate-Starch Based Hydrogels for Topical Bactericidal Applications against Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2024, 101, 101272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Xie, X.; Deng, F.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, K.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Shi, Z.; et al. A Tissue-Adhesive, Mechanically Enhanced, Natural Aloe vera-Based Injectable Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Macrophage Mediation and Collagen Proliferation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 283, 137452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dey, A.; Bera, R.; Chakrabarty, D. Influence of Aloe vera on the Properties of N-Vinylpyrrolidone-Acrylamide Copolymer Hydrogel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 168, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rashedi, S.; Heydari, P.; Kharazi, A.Z.; Varshosaz, J.; Sheikholeslam, M. Chitosan/Poly (Β-amino Ester) Hydrogel by Controlled Release of Centella asiatica Promoted Wound Healing through Improved Collagen Expression and Antibacterial and Anti-inflammatory Properties. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2025, 65, 2418–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sampath Udeni Gunathilake, T.M.; Ching, Y.C.; Chuah, C.H.; Illias, H.A.; Ching, K.Y.; Singh, R.; Nai-Shang, L. Influence of a Nonionic Surfactant on Curcumin Delivery of Nanocellulose Reinforced Chitosan Hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Alves, C.; Ribeiro, A.; Pinto, E.; Santos, J.; Soares, G. Exploring Z-Tyr-Phe-OH-Based Hydrogels Loaded with Curcumin for the Development of Dressings for Wound Healing. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 73, 103484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bai, Q.; Hu, F.; Gou, S.; Gao, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, T. Curcumin-Loaded Chitosan-Based Hydrogels Accelerating S. Aureus-Infected Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 259, 129111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gupta, S.; Ghoshal, G. Plant Protein Hydrogel as a Delivery System of Curcumin: Characterization and In Vitro Release Kinetics. Food Bioprod. Process. 2024, 143, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jayaramudu, T.; Raghavendra, G.M.; Varaprasad, K.; Raju, K.M.; Sadiku, E.R.; Kim, J. 5-Fluorouracil Encapsulated Magnetic Nanohydrogels for Drug-delivery Applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Jayaramudu, T.; Varaprasad, K.; Sadiku, E.R.; Kim, H.C.; Kim, J. Preparation of Antibacterial Temperature-sensitive Silver-nanocomposite Hydrogels from N. -isopropylacrylamide with Green Tea. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Abid Mustafa, M.; Rashid Hussain, H.; Akbar Khan, J.; Ahmad, N.; Bashir, S.; Asad, M.; Saeed Shah, H.; Ali Khan, A.; Malik, A.; Fatima, S.; et al. Development and In Vitro Characterization of Azadirachta indica Gum Grafted Polyacrylamide Based PH-Sensitive Hydrogels to Improve the Bioavailability of Lansoprazole. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e202401434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Vigata, M.; Meinert, C.; Hutmacher, D.W.; Bock, N. Hydrogels as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review of Current Characterization and Evaluation Techniques. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ghasemi, A.H.; Farazin, A.; Mohammadimehr, M.; Naeimi, H. Fabrication and Characterization of Biopolymers with Antibacterial Nanoparticles and Calendula officinalis Flower Extract as an Active Ingredient for Modern Hydrogel Wound Dressings. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pelin, I.M.; Silion, M.; Popescu, I.; Rîmbu, C.M.; Fundueanu, G.; Constantin, M. Pullulan/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogels Loaded with Calendula officinalis Extract: Design and In Vitro Evaluation for Wound Healing Applications. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Choudhary, V.; Malik, A. Enhanced Wound-Healing by Hydrogel from Okra Mucilage Grafted with Poly-2-Acrylamido-2-Methylpropane Sulfonic Acid (AMPS), a Stimuli-Responsive Polymer. Eur. Polym. J. 2025, 227, 113748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hong, G.S.; Choi, J.Y.; Suh, J.S.; Lim, J.O.; Choi, J.H. Development of a Natural Matrix Hybrid Hydrogel Patch and Evaluation of Its Efficacy against Atopic Dermatitis. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hezari, S.; Olad, A.; Dilmaghani, A. Investigation of Antibacterial Properties and Sustained Release of Centella asiatica Extract from Fe-MOF-Reinforced Gelatin-Based Hydrogels. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 14701–14725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hezari, S.; Olad, A.; Dilmaghani, A. Development of Gelatin and Modified Gelatin Hydrogels Incorporated with Aluminum-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks as a Potential Wound Dressing. Polym. Bull. 2025, 82, 11947–11981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Khamrai, M.; Banerjee, S.L.; Paul, S.; Samanta, S.; Kundu, P.P. Curcumin Entrapped Gelatin/Ionically Modified Bacterial Cellulose Based Self-Healable Hydrogel Film: An Eco-Friendly Sustainable Synthesis Method of Wound Healing Patch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Luo, C.; Wei, N.; Sun, X.; Luo, F. Fabrication of Self-healable, Conductive, and Ultra-strong Hydrogel from Polyvinyl Alcohol and Grape Seed–Extracted Polymer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 49118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chuysinuan, P.; Chunshom, N.; Kotcharat, P.; Thanyacharoen, T.; Techasakul, S.; Ummartyotin, S. The Encapsulation of Green Tea Extract in Cyclodextrin and Loading into Chitosan-Based Composites: Controlled-Release Behavior and Antioxidant Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2628–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Aminu, N.; Alfred-Ugbenbo, D.; Moradeke, O.; Audu Mumuni, M.; Muhammad Umar, N.; Tanko, N.; Raghavulu Bitra, V.; Tshepo Moshapa, F.; Monkgogi, T.; Siok-Yee, C. Nanogel Drug Delivery System Loaded with Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (Neem) for Potential Treatment of Wound Infection: Development and Characterization. Beni Suef Univ. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. 2025, 14, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sharaf, S.; El-Naggar, M.E. Wound Dressing Properties of Cationized Cotton Fabric Treated with Carrageenan/Cyclodextrin Hydrogel Loaded with Honey Bee Propolis Extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Eakwaropas, P.; Ngawhirunpat, T.; Rojanarata, T.; Patrojanasophon, P.; Opanasopit, P.; Nuntharatanapong, N. Formulation and Optimal Design of Dioscorea bulbifera and Honey-Loaded Gantrez®/Xyloglucan Hydrogel as Wound Healing Patches. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yang, S.; Wang, F.; Han, H.; Santos, H.A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wei, J.; Cai, Z. Fabricated Technology of Biomedical Micro-Nano Hydrogel. Biomed. Technol. 2023, 2, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Julie, B.-A.; John, R.; Natalia, M.-C. Microstructural, Bioactive, and Wound-Healing Properties of Chitosan-Based Dressings with Encapsulated Aloe vera and Curcuma longa Extracts. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 47, 113047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ameli, S.; Nourani, M.; Bakhshi, N.; Salemi, B.; Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M. Alginate-Gelatin Composite Hydrogels for Encapsulating Aloe vera Extract; Optimization, Characterization, and Release Kinetics. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2025, 9, 100717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Shefa, A.A.; Sultana, T.; Park, M.K.; Lee, S.Y.; Gwon, J.-G.; Lee, B.-T. Curcumin Incorporation into an Oxidized Cellulose Nanofiber-Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel System Promotes Wound Healing. Mater. Des. 2020, 186, 108313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cardoso-Daodu, I.M.; Ilomuanya, M.O.; Azubuike, C.P. Development of Curcumin-Loaded Liposomes in Lysine–Collagen Hydrogel for Surgical Wound Healing. Beni Suef Univ. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kour, P.; Afzal, S.; Gani, A.; Zargar, M.I.; Nabi Tak, U.; Rashid, S.; Dar, A.A. Effect of Nanoemulsion-Loaded Hybrid Biopolymeric Hydrogel Beads on the Release Kinetics, Antioxidant Potential and Antibacterial Activity of Encapsulated Curcumin. Food Chem. 2022, 376, 131925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mahdian, M.; Akbari Asrari, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Madrakian, T.; Rezvani Jalal, N.; Afkhami, A.; Moradi, M.; Gholami, L. Dual Stimuli-Responsive Gelatin-Based Hydrogel for PH and Temperature-Sensitive Delivery of Curcumin Anticancer Drug. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 84, 104537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Preda, P.; Enciu, A.-M.; Adiaconita, B.; Mihalache, I.; Craciun, G.; Boldeiu, A.; Aricov, L.; Romanitan, C.; Stan, D.; Marculescu, C.; et al. New Amorphous Hydrogels with Proliferative Properties as Potential Tools in Wound Healing. Gels 2022, 8, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Garcia-Orue, I.; Santos-Vizcaino, E.; Uranga, J.; de la Caba, K.; Guerrero, P.; Igartua, M.; Hernandez, R.M. Agar/Gelatin Hydro-Film Containing EGF and Aloe vera for Effective Wound Healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 6896–6910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Darwish, M.M.; Elneklawi, M.S.; Mohamad, E.A. Aloe vera Coated Dextran Sulfate/Chitosan Nanoparticles (Aloe vera @ DS/CS) Encapsulating Eucalyptus Essential Oil with Antibacterial Potent Property. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2023, 34, 810–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Karimi, E.; Gharib, B.; Rostami, N.; Navidpour, L.; Afshar, M. Clinical Efficacy of a Topical Polyherbal Formulation in the Management of Fluorouracil-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome. J. Herb. Med. 2019, 17, 100270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Colobatiu, L.; Gavan, A.; Mocan, A.; Bogdan, C.; Mirel, S.; Tomuta, I. Development of Bioactive Compounds-Loaded Chitosan Films by Using a QbD Approach—A Novel and Potential Wound Dressing Material. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 138, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chanaj-Kaczmarek, J.; Paczkowska, M.; Osmałek, T.; Kaproń, B.; Plech, T.; Szymanowska, D.; Karaźniewicz-Łada, M.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Cielecka-Piontek, J. Hydrogel Delivery System Containing Calendulae Flos Lyophilized Extract with Chitosan as a Supporting Strategy for Wound Healing Applications. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Saha, I.; Roy, S.; Das, D.; Das, S.; Karmakar, P. Topical Effect of Polyherbal Flowers Extract on Xanthan Gum Hydrogel Patch—Induced Wound Healing Activity in Human Cell Lines and Male BALB/c Mice. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 18, 035016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Mathew, D.; Thomas, B.; Soumya, P.T.; Sudheep, N.M. Development of Chitosan Based Hydrogels with Marigold Flower Extract: An Innovative, Low Cost, Biodegradable and Antimicrobial Solution for Enhanced Wound Healing Applications. Results Surf. Interfaces 2025, 20, 100602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kuo, C.-W.; Chiu, Y.-F.; Wu, M.-H.; Li, M.-H.; Wu, C.-N.; Chen, W.-S.; Huang, C.-H. Gelatin/Chitosan Bilayer Patches Loaded with Cortex Phellodendron amurense/Centella asiatica Extracts for Anti-Acne Application. Polymers 2021, 13, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Tohidi, A.; Montazer, M.; Mianehro, A.; Rad, M.M. Biocompatible Polysaccharide-Based Wound Dressing Comprising Cellulose Fabric Treated with Gum Tragacanth, Alginate, Bacterial Cellulose, and Chamomile Extracts. Starch-Stärke 2024, 76, 2300117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zakerikhoob, M.; Abbasi, S.; Yousefi, G.; Mokhtari, M.; Noorbakhsh, M.S. Curcumin-Incorporated Crosslinked Sodium Alginate-g-Poly (N-Isopropyl Acrylamide) Thermo-Responsive Hydrogel as an in-Situ Forming Injectable Dressing for Wound Healing: In Vitro Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 271, 118434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bhubhanil, S.; Talodthaisong, C.; Khongkow, M.; Namdee, K.; Wongchitrat, P.; Yingmema, W.; Hutchison, J.A.; Lapmanee, S.; Kulchat, S. Enhanced Wound Healing Properties of Guar Gum/Curcumin-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticle Hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Chopra, H.; Bibi, S.; Mohanta, Y.K.; Kumar Mohanta, T.; Kumar, S.; Singh, I.; Saad Khan, M.; Ranjan Rauta, P.; Alshammari, A.; Alharbi, M.; et al. In Vitro and In Silico Characterization of Curcumin-Loaded Chitosan–PVA Hydrogels: Antimicrobial and Potential Wound Healing Activity. Gels 2023, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Khodaei, A.; Johari, N.; Jahanmard, F.; Cecotto, L.; Khosravimelal, S.; Madaah Hosseini, H.R.; Bagheri, R.; Samadikuchaksaraei, A.; Amin Yavari, S. Particulate 3D Hydrogels of Silk Fibroin-Pluronic to Deliver Curcumin for Infection-Free Wound Healing. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Yang, J.; Duan, A.; Shen, L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y. Preparation and Application of Curcumin Loaded with Citric Acid Crosslinked Chitosan-Gelatin Hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Cai, J.; Zhong, H.; Tang, W.; Wen, F.; Lv, Y.; Huang, X.; Luo, J.; Li, P. Multiple Response Behaviors of Curcumin-Loaded Ammonium Alginate/Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel and Its Application. Biomass Convers. Biorefin 2024, 14, 16121–16139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kannan, P.R.; Kumar, C.S.; Zhao, R.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Li, Y.; Kong, X. Dual-Functional Hydrogel with Curcumin-Loaded GelMA and Silk Fibroin for Wound Healing: Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 44, 112014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Sun, S.; Wang, K. Multi-Functional Dressing with Curcumin Displays Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, Angiogenic, and Collagen Regeneration Effects in Diabetic Wound Healing. J. Mater. Sci. 2025, 60, 6217–6234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Teixeira, L.S.; Sousa, M.; Massano, F.; Borges, A. Exploring Grape Pomace Extracts for the Formulation of New Bioactive Multifunctional Chitosan/Alginate-Based Hydrogels for Wound Healing Applications. Food Biosci. 2024, 62, 105073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Das, P.; Chakravarty, T.; Roy, A.J.; Manna, S.; Nandi, S.K.; Basak, P. Sustainable Development of Draksha- Beeja Extract Loaded Gelatin and Starch-Based Green and Biodegradable Mats for Potential Tissue Engineering Applications. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 34, 101134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wang, T.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, R.; Wang, C.; Hu, K.; Sun, Y.; Politis, C.; Shavandi, A.; Nie, L. Polyvinyl Alcohol/Sodium Alginate Hydrogels Incorporated with Silver Nanoclusters via Green Tea Extract for Antibacterial Applications. Des. Monomers Polym. 2020, 23, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Rungrod, A.; Makarasen, A.; Patnin, S.; Techasakul, S.; Somsunan, R. Design and Development of a Sprayable Hydrogel Based on Thermo/PH Dual-Responsive Polymer Incorporating Azadirachta indica (Neem) Extract for Wound Dressing Applications. Polymers 2025, 17, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Abd El-Malek, F.F.; Yousef, A.S.; El-Assar, S.A. Hydrogel Film Loaded with New Formula from Manuka Honey for Treatment of Chronic Wound Infections. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2017, 11, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kim, J.; Lee, C.-M. Transdermal Hydrogel Composed of Polyacrylic Acid Containing Propolis for Wound Healing in a Rat Model. Macromol. Res. 2018, 26, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Saleh, S.; Salama, A.; Ali, A.M.; Saleh, A.K.; Elhady, B.A.; Tolba, E. Egyptian Propolis Extract for Functionalization of Cellulose Nanofiber/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Porous Hydrogel along with Characterization and Biological Applications. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Cao-Luu, N.-H.; Nguyen, T.-V.; Luong, H.-V.-T.; Dang, H.-G.; Pham, H.-G. Engineered Polyvinyl Alcohol/Chitosan/Carrageenan Nanofibrous Membrane Loaded with Aloe vera for Accelerating Third-Degree Burn Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 311, 143880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Choudhary, V.; Sharma, S.; Malik, A.; Shrivastav, A.; Shukla, P.K. In Vivo Study of Modified Okra Mucilage/Acrylic Acid Hydrogels Loaded with Ethanolic Extracts of Calendula officinalis for Wound Healing Application. Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. 2025, 13, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Le, T.T.N.; Nguyen, T.K.N.; Nguyen, V.M.; Dao, T.C.M.; Nguyen, H.B.C.; Dang, C.T.; Le, T.B.C.; Nguyen, T.K.L.; Nguyen, P.T.T.; Dang, L.H.N.; et al. Development and Characterization of a Hydrogel Containing Curcumin-Loaded Nanoemulsion for Enhanced In Vitro Antibacteria and In Vivo Wound Healing. Molecules 2023, 28, 6433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cai, X.; He, Y.; Cai, L.; Zhan, J.; Li, Q.; Zhong, S.; Hou, H.; Wang, W.; Qiu, X. An Injectable Elastic Hydrogel Crosslinked with Curcumin–Gelatin Nanoparticles as a Multifunctional Dressing for the Rapid Repair of Bacterially Infected Wounds. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 3227–3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Fan, X.; Huang, J.; Zhang, W.; Su, Z.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, P. A Multifunctional, Tough, Stretchable, and Transparent Curcumin Hydrogel with Potent Antimicrobial, Antioxidative, Anti-Inflammatory, and Angiogenesis Capabilities for Diabetic Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 9749–9767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ma, H.; Zhou, Q.; Chang, J.; Wu, C. Grape Seed-Inspired Smart Hydrogel Scaffolds for Melanoma Therapy and Wound Healing. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 4302–4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kurt, A.A.; Ibrahim, B.; Cinar, H.; Ozmen, O. Enhanced Therapeutic Potential of Hypericum perforatum L.: A Comprehensive In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Nanoparticle-Hydrogel Formulations. J. Nanotechnol. 2025, 2025, 6232038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Hajian, M.; Mahmoodi, M.; Imani, R. In Vitro Assessment of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Film Incorporating Aloe vera for Potential Application as a Wound Dressing. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2017, 56, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Bhar, B.; Chakraborty, B.; Nandi, S.K.; Mandal, B.B. Silk-Based Phyto-Hydrogel Formulation Expedites Key Events of Wound Healing in Full-Thickness Skin Defect Model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 203, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Alvandi, H.; Jaymand, M.; Eskandari, M.; Aghaz, F.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Heydari, M.; Arkan, E. A Sandwich Electrospun Nanofibers/Tragacanth Hydrogel Composite Containing Aloe vera Extract and Silver Sulfadiazine as a Wound Dressing. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 11235–11248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Manoharan, S.; Balakrishnan, P.; Sellappan, L.K. Fabrication of Highly Flexible Biopolymeric Chitosan/Agarose Based Bioscaffold with Matricaria recutita Herbal Extract for Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 281, 136195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ferfera-Harrar, H.; Berdous, D.; Benhalima, T. Hydrogel Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan-g-Polyacrylamide and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Curcuma longa for Antibacterial Applications. Polym. Bull. 2018, 75, 2819–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Jessy Mercy, D.; Thirumalai, A.; Udayakumar, S.; Deepika, B.; Janani, G.; Girigoswami, A.; Girigoswami, K. Enhancing Wound Healing with Nanohydrogel-Entrapped Plant Extracts and Nanosilver: An In Vitro Investigation. Molecules 2024, 29, 5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Oryan, A.; Alemzadeh, E.; Mohammadi, A.A.; Moshiri, A. Healing Potential of Injectable Aloe vera Hydrogel Loaded by Adipose-Derived Stem Cell in Skin Tissue-Engineering in a Rat Burn Wound Model. Cell Tissue Res. 2019, 377, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Sharma, A.; Mittal, P.; Yadav, A.; Mishra, A.K.; Hazari, P.P.; Sharma, R.K. Sustained Activity of Stimuli-Responsive Curcumin and Acemannan Based Hydrogel Patches in Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 598–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Liao, H.T.; Lai, Y.-T.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-P. A Bioactive Multi-Functional Heparin-Grafted Aligned Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide)/Curcumin Nanofiber Membrane to Accelerate Diabetic Wound Healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 120, 111689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lacatusu, I.; Badea, G.; Popescu, M.; Bordei, N.; Istrati, D.; Moldovan, L.; Seciu, A.M.; Panteli, M.I.; Rasit, I.; Badea, N. Marigold Extract, Azelaic Acid and Black Caraway Oil into Lipid Nanocarriers Provides a Strong Anti-Inflammatory Effect In Vivo. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanistic diagram illustrating how natural therapeutic agents are incorporated into hydrogel matrices and contribute to key pathways in the wound-healing network, including anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity, fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, angiogenesis, and wound closure.
Figure 1. Mechanistic diagram illustrating how natural therapeutic agents are incorporated into hydrogel matrices and contribute to key pathways in the wound-healing network, including anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity, fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, angiogenesis, and wound closure.
Polymers 17 03105 g001
Figure 4. Cell wall after wounding (a)—negative control, (b)—C. officinalis flower extract; (c)—Alginate hydrogel; (d)—C. officinalis flower extract loaded in hydrogel. Adapted with permission from ref. [37].
Figure 4. Cell wall after wounding (a)—negative control, (b)—C. officinalis flower extract; (c)—Alginate hydrogel; (d)—C. officinalis flower extract loaded in hydrogel. Adapted with permission from ref. [37].
Polymers 17 03105 g004
Figure 5. Curcumin-loaded into PVA-CS-SA hydrogels—in vitro fibroblasts and HUVECs cell migration; (ae) Control FBs and HUVECs. Scale bar: 150 μm; (f) Transwell migration of FBs quantified in the histogram; (gk) HUVECs treated with PCSA1, PCSA5, and PCSA7, respectively. Scale bar: 150 μm. (l) Transwell migration of HUVECs quantified in the histogram. Adapted with permission from ref. [168].
Figure 5. Curcumin-loaded into PVA-CS-SA hydrogels—in vitro fibroblasts and HUVECs cell migration; (ae) Control FBs and HUVECs. Scale bar: 150 μm; (f) Transwell migration of FBs quantified in the histogram; (gk) HUVECs treated with PCSA1, PCSA5, and PCSA7, respectively. Scale bar: 150 μm. (l) Transwell migration of HUVECs quantified in the histogram. Adapted with permission from ref. [168].
Polymers 17 03105 g005
Figure 6. (A) Representative photographs illustrating the wound healing progression at selected time intervals for the control (blank), honey, and PVA-Aloe vera-honey hydrogel; (B) Percentage of wound closure evaluated over 19 days; (C) Histological micrographs of wound tissues collected on days 5, 12, and 19 and stained with H&E (EPI: epidermis; BV: blood vessels; FI: fibroblasts; IC: inflammatory cells); (D) Histopathological sections of wounds stained with Masson’s trichrome on days 5, 12, and 19 (scale bar = 100 µm). Adapted with permission from ref. [89].
Figure 6. (A) Representative photographs illustrating the wound healing progression at selected time intervals for the control (blank), honey, and PVA-Aloe vera-honey hydrogel; (B) Percentage of wound closure evaluated over 19 days; (C) Histological micrographs of wound tissues collected on days 5, 12, and 19 and stained with H&E (EPI: epidermis; BV: blood vessels; FI: fibroblasts; IC: inflammatory cells); (D) Histopathological sections of wounds stained with Masson’s trichrome on days 5, 12, and 19 (scale bar = 100 µm). Adapted with permission from ref. [89].
Polymers 17 03105 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Călina, I.C.; Scărișoreanu, A.; Demeter, M.; Mănăilă, E.; Crăciun, G. Strategies for Incorporating Natural Therapeutic Agents into Hydrogel Dressings: Innovations in Wound Healing. Polymers 2025, 17, 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17233105

AMA Style

Călina IC, Scărișoreanu A, Demeter M, Mănăilă E, Crăciun G. Strategies for Incorporating Natural Therapeutic Agents into Hydrogel Dressings: Innovations in Wound Healing. Polymers. 2025; 17(23):3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17233105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Călina, Ion Cosmin, Anca Scărișoreanu, Maria Demeter, Elena Mănăilă, and Gabriela Crăciun. 2025. "Strategies for Incorporating Natural Therapeutic Agents into Hydrogel Dressings: Innovations in Wound Healing" Polymers 17, no. 23: 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17233105

APA Style

Călina, I. C., Scărișoreanu, A., Demeter, M., Mănăilă, E., & Crăciun, G. (2025). Strategies for Incorporating Natural Therapeutic Agents into Hydrogel Dressings: Innovations in Wound Healing. Polymers, 17(23), 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17233105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop