Next Article in Journal
Functional Additives in Automotive Polymer Matrices: Compatibility, Mechanisms, and Industry Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of Aged Bulk-Fill Resin Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Polymeric Nanofiber Composites: Fabrications, Mechanisms, and Applications

by
Hany M. Abdelmoneim
1,
Tarek H. Taha
2,*,
Abdulrahman Mohammed Alhudhaibi
2,
Feras M. Afifi
3,*,
Abdullah A. Faqihi
4,
Sulaiman A. Alsalamah
2 and
Hamdi Bendif
2
1
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
2
Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11623, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Physics, Al-Leith University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Jazan University, P. O. Box 706, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(17), 2327; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172327
Submission received: 15 July 2025 / Revised: 22 August 2025 / Accepted: 23 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites)

Abstract

This manuscript reviews the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and their incorporation into polymeric nanofiber composites. It discusses various synthesis methods, emphasizing eco-friendly biological approaches over chemical and physical ones due to their cost-effectiveness and reduced toxicity. The review emphasizes the enhanced antimicrobial properties of AgNPs and their composites, particularly in electrospun nanofibers, for diverse biomedical, environmental, and industrial applications. It also covers the characterization, properties, and mechanisms of AgNPs, along with the advantages of combining them with polymers such as PVA and PEO, as well as cyclodextrin, to create novel functional nanocomposites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology is the science of the manipulation of matter on a very small scale, with a size in the range of 1–100 nm [1,2,3]. Nanotechnology is one of the most vital fields of research in materials science, focusing on the synthesis and applications of nanoparticles [4]. There has been considerable interest in synthesizing composite materials at the nanoscale, at which materials have unique chemical, physical, optical, magnetic, and electrical properties, which leads to many potential applications [4,5,6]. Composite nanomaterials in which noble metal nanoparticles are dispersed in a polymer matrix may display novel physical and chemical properties of great scientific and technological importance [7]. Metal nanoparticles are important due to their potential applications in catalysis, photonics, biomedicine, antimicrobial activity, and optics [8]. Among all the noble metals, silver has been used as an antimicrobial agent since ancient times, with historical records showing its use by ancient Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and Phoenician civilizations for water purification, wound treatment, prevention of infections, and food preservation [9,10]. It has gained much attention due to its medicinal, clinical, and culinary properties [11,12].
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) can be synthesized using various methods, such as chemical, physical, and biological methods [13,14]. However, the chemical and physical methods are costly, quite complicated, and potentially harmful to the environment due to the toxic chemical compounds used as reducing agents [15,16]. The biological approaches, also known as “green synthesis methods,” have recently received more attention due to their ability to avoid the use of toxic chemicals as well as being cost-effective and eco-friendly [17,18]. Recent studies have highlighted the effectiveness of plant-mediated green synthesis of AgNPs, emphasizing their enhanced antimicrobial properties and potential applications in biomedicine and environmental remediation [19,20]. Therefore, both the research and industrial sectors are currently interested in the biosynthesis of AgNPs for use in many biomedical, environmental, and industrial applications [21]. It is also widely used for therapeutic purpose due to its antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and anticancer activities [22,23,24,25,26]. Recent proteomic and mechanistic studies have revealed their broad-spectrum biocidal potential and synergy with antibiotics, further strengthening their biomedical relevance [27]. Numerous microorganisms, such as fungi, bacteria, yeast, and actinomycetes, which can produce AgNPs through intracellular or extracellular pathways [4]. Among them, bacteria have received the most attention in the biosynthesis of nanoparticles due to their rapid growth, ease of handling, and genetic modification [28,29]. Extracellular production is preferred because it eliminates the need for complex extraction and purification steps [30,31].
Recent advances in nanomaterials science have highlighted the potential of engineered nanomaterials for a variety of applications. For instance, the surface engineering of M5X4 MXenes is being explored for next-generation energy solutions, focusing on how modifying their surface chemistry can enhance their electronic, electrochemical, and optical properties [32]. This approach of tuning material properties at the nanoscale is conceptually similar to the green synthesis of AgNPs and their integration into polymeric nanofiber composites. AgNPs have a limited range of applications when used alone, but when incorporated into the polymer matrix, their applicability is greatly enhanced [33]. The combination of nanofibers and nanoparticles technologies maximizes their structural properties, making them an ideal mixture for many applications [34]. Polymeric nanofiber composites containing AgNPs have been reported to exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria [35,36]. Nanofibrous materials consist of fibers with a diameter less than 500 nm, and have several advantages over their bulk counterparts [37]. The properties of nanofibers, such as nanometric thickness, controllable porosity, and high contact surface area, enable potential applications in various fields [34]. Furthermore, nanofibers have the ability to combine with nanoparticles either in their bulk or on their surface to create so-called “nanofibrous composite materials” [38]. Various techniques, such as phase separation, self-assembly, and electrospinning, have been proposed for the synthesis of nanofibrous materials [39]. Of the various fabrication methods, the electrospinning stands out for its low cost, versatility, and single-step setup [40]. Recent advancements have demonstrated the successful incorporation of AgNPs into electrospun nanofibers, enhancing their antimicrobial efficacy and potential for biomedical applications [6].
Natural and synthetic polymers are increasingly combined to produce composite nanofibers. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) are hydrophilic polymers with excellent biocompatibility, mechanical performance, and low toxicity [36]. They are also easily electrospinnable due to their high molecular weight and viscosity [41]. Beta-cyclodextrins (β-CDs), although not polymers, have attractive properties when incorporated into electrospun fibers. These cyclic oligosaccharides form inclusion complexes with a wide range of molecules that alter the apparent solubility and stability of the guest molecule [42]. When incorporated into a polymer matrix, they can help control the release rate [43]. The addition of β-CD in polymer nanofibers would be extremely attractive since the composites have novel characteristics, which can potentially improve the application areas of nanofibers [7,44]. In green synthesis, polymer-based nanoparticles serve as both scaffolds for coordinating silver ions (Ag+) and as electron donors to facilitate reduction of Ag+ to elemental silver (Ag0). The functional groups present on the polymer, such as amines, phenols, and carbonyls, play a crucial role in determining the speed of the reduction process (reduction kinetics) and the stability of the resulting colloidal nanoparticles [45,46]. Chitosan and lignin utilize different chemical mechanisms for reduction reactions. Chitosan, with its high amine density, forms transient Schiff bases to reduce Ag+ [47], while lignin employs redox-active phenolics for the same purpose [48]. This behavior contrasts with synthetic polymers like PVP, where terminal hydroxyls drive reduction [49]. For instance, polyphenols facilitate single-electron transfers that result in the formation of semiquinone radicals [50]. In contrast, polysaccharides are involved in two-electron transfers that proceed through aldehyde intermediates [51]. The ultimate morphology of the nanoparticles is further determined by the stabilization mechanism, which can be either steric, as observed with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) [52], or electrostatic, as seen with chitosan [53].
In light of these developments, the specific objective of this review is to provide a focused, up-to-date synthesis of (i) green synthesis strategies of AgNPs, (ii) their antimicrobial applications, and (iii) their integration into polymeric nanofiber composites, with particular attention to fabrication techniques, functional mechanisms, application potential, and future challenges. This targeted perspective aims to guide interdisciplinary research linking nanotechnology, microbiology, and materials science toward practical applications in healthcare, food safety, and environmental protection.
In brief, this review is discussing the approach of green synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications of AgNPs. It also covers the processing, characterization, and properties of AgNP-containing polymeric nanofibers, followed by their considerable antimicrobial activity and applications.

2. Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology is the field of applied science that deals with matter at the molecular and atomic scales, usually 100 nm or smaller, and it focuses on this range when used in materials or devices [54,55]. Due to its ability to control particle size to fit functions that would otherwise be impossible to fit using conventional methods, nanotechnology has seen rapid growth in the last few decades [40,56]. It is an emerging cutting-edge technology in many different scientific fields, including biology, chemistry, and materials science [13]. This includes polymer science, polymer-based biomaterials, nanoparticles for drug delivery, miniemulsion particles, layer-by-layer self-assembled polymer films, electrospun nanofibers, imprint lithography, polymer blends, and nanocomposites [57]. The novel classes of nano-based materials have received significant attention due to their essential advantages, including bioimaging, biocompatibility, functionalization and tumor targeting [58]. Nanomaterials typically range in size from 1 to 100 nm. This size is about 10−9, or a billionth of a meter [27,54]. On the other hand, the developing simple, reliable, green, and eco-friendly procedures for the synthesizing nanomaterials is an important aspect of nanotechnology [59]. Biogenic nanotechnology constitutes an area of interest with the important objective of facilitating the production of nanomaterials, such as metal nanoparticles [60]. Several studies have reported that metal nanoparticles could be incorporated into polymeric nanofibers to impart antimicrobial activity for biomedical applications [61]. Among these metal nanoparticles, AgNPs have been widely used as a bioactive polymeric material due to their catalytic activity, antimicrobial activity, higher conductivity, and non-toxic nature [62,63]. Therefore, AgNPs represent potent candidates for the developing innovative and effective nanotechnology-derived biocompatible nanostructured materials for unconventional antimicrobial applications [64,65,66].

3. Nanoparticles (NPs)

Nanoparticles are small fragments with a nanoscale diameter that ranges between 1–100 nm, with very good thermal conductivity, catalytic reactivity, non-linear optical performance, and chemical stability due to their large surface area-to-volume ratio [67,68]. They are generally classified into different groups based on sizes, shapes, and properties. The different groups include carbon-based nanoparticles, metal nanoparticles, ceramic nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and many others [69,70,71]. Metal nanoparticles, as inorganic nanoparticles, exhibit very different physical and chemical properties than conventional bulk metal [72]. The properties of nanoparticles depend on their size and shape, as well as their composition [73]. They have a high surface area-to-volume ratio, which confers unique properties on them and enhances their catalytic, magnetic, mechanical, and optical properties, thereby expanding their potential biomedical applications [74,75,76]. Nanoparticles can be synthesized using multiple methods, including chemical, physical, and biological ones [27]. Silver nanoparticles are considered to be one of the most used nanoparticles by researchers due to their unique properties such as high conductivity, chemical resistance, antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, anti-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties in different fields of medicine [68,72]. The incorporation of AgNPs into polymeric nanofibers has attracted considerable attention due to their strong and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity [77], sensitive and specific detection ability of DNA [78], plasmonic effect as catalysts [79], and superior electrical conductivity [80,81].

4. Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs)

4.1. Silver, Background Information

Silver is a shining white metallic element, placed 47th in the periodic chart with Ag, meaning “Argentum”, as its chemical symbol [82]. Silver is one of the fundamental elements that make up our planet. It is a rare but naturally occurring element that is slightly harder than gold, and very ductile and malleable [83,84]. Pure silver has the highest electrical and thermal conductivity of all metals and has the lowest contact resistance [85]. Silver can be found in four different oxidation states: Ag0, Ag+, Ag2+, and Ag3+. The first two are the most abundant; the last two are unstable in the aquatic environment. The free silver ion is Ag+ [83,86]. Silver has been widely used for thousands of years in human history for applications including jewelry, utensils, monetary currency, dental alloy, photography, and explosives [87]. Among silver’s many applications, those exploiting its disinfectant property for hygienic and medicinal purposes are time-honoured and prominent. Hippocrates, the father of modern medicine, believed that silver powder had beneficial healing and anti-disease properties, and it was considered an ulcer treatment [82]. Silver as an ion was used in earlier civilizations, particularly in Egypt. This silver ion was used mainly in wound dressings to treat wounds that were hard to heal [88]. However, advancements in modern science have helped silver regain its lost luster. Metallic silver is subjected to new engineering technologies that result in extraordinary novel morphologies and characteristics. Instead of being made “large,” metallic silver is transformed into ultrafine particles whose size is measured in nanometers (nm). When these particles have at least one dimension less than 100 nm, they are called nanoparticles [71,89].

4.2. Characteristics

AgNPs have been widely explored among various metallic and non-metallic nanoparticles due to their applicability and versatility [90,91,92]. AgNPs are nanoscale structures made of silver atoms that have been metallically bonded together. AgNPs are a group of silver atoms ranging in size from 1 to 100 nm, which can be synthesized with various approaches using different precursors, reductants, and capping agents [26,93]. Physical and chemical properties of AgNPs—including surface chemistry, size, size distribution, shape, particle morphology, particle composition, coating/capping, agglomeration, dissolution rate, particle reactivity in solution, efficiency of ion release, cell type, and finally, type of reducing agents used for synthesis—are crucial factors for determination of cytotoxicity of AgNPs [94]. At the nanoscale, particles exhibit different physical, optical, and chemical properties owing to the dominance of quantum mechanics [93,95]. AgNPs have among the best antimicrobial characteristics covering a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms [68]. They exhibit very strong bactericidal activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including multi-resistant strains [76,96]. Also, AgNPs have received wide attention in wastewater treatment, biomedicine, drug delivery, vector control, and agriculture [68,97]. The efficient conductivity of AgNPs has increased their applications in a wide array of products, such as electronic devices, inks, adhesives, and pastes, and in controlling microbial growth and infections, which has also made them eco-friendly [98,99]. AgNPs have drawn tremendous academic and industrial interest due to their antibacterial, fungicidal, and antiviral properties [36,68,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107].

4.3. Methods of AgNP Synthesis

AgNPs are synthesized using various physical, chemical, and biological methods, which results in different shapes and sizes for use in numerous applications [13,76]. These methods of synthesis are categorized into two main categories, namely “top-down” and “bottom-up” approaches (Figure 1) [20,71,108]. In the top-down approach, the size of silver metal in its bulk form is reduced mechanically to the nanoscale, while the bottom-up approach (self-assembly) involves the dissolution of silver salts in a solvent, reducing silver ions to their element with the use of a reducing agent, and then stabilizing the resulting neutral silver nanoparticles with stabilizing agents to prevent agglomeration [14,109,110].

4.3.1. Top-Down Approach

In this synthesis method, a destructive approach is used to produce AgNPs. It begins with breaking down a larger molecule, which is decomposed into smaller units, and then these units are converted into suitable nanoparticles [26,110]. It is energy-demanding and requires extensive processing. The major advantage of this technique is the control of the size distribution and morphologies of nanoparticles [111,112]. This approach, also known as physical synthesis methods, includes laser ablation, lithography, grinding or milling, spray pyrolysis, evaporation–condensation, and other decomposition processes [13,68].

4.3.2. Bottom-Up Approach

The bottom-up technique is the reverse of the top-down method. It involves bringing together atoms and molecules to produce a diverse range of nanoparticles [26,110]; therefore, this approach is also called the “building-up approach.” The sol–gel process, laser pyrolysis, aerosol process, chemical vapor deposition, and biological agent-assisted synthesis are a few examples of this approach [68,113]. In this approach, nanoparticles can be synthesized using either chemical or biological methods by the self-assembly phenomenon of atoms into new nuclei, which grow into nanoscaled particles [112,114]. The green and biological method of bottom-up synthesis of nanoparticles has recently attracted more attention from many researchers. In green synthesis of nanoparticles there is no need to use high temperature, pressure, or energy, or toxic chemicals [13,112,115]. In this approach, AgNPs are synthesized using biological systems, including various sources such as bacteria, fungi, algae, and plant extracts [20,116].

5. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Plant Extracts

The bioactive molecules found in plants and their parts include polysaccharides, fats, proteins, amino acids, nucleic acids, pigments, enzymes, vitamins, and several types of secondary metabolites, which act as reducing agents to produce nanoparticles from metal salts without producing any toxic by-products [112,117,118]. Several studies have been carried out on the synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts. Gardea-Torresdey et al. [119] were the first to report the synthesis of AgNPs using alfalfa sprouts. Ahmad and Sharma, Ref. [15] also synthesized AgNPs using Ananas comosus extract and characterized the synthesized AgNPs using different techniques. Velmurugan et al. [120] also reported the synthesis of AgNPs using peanut shell extract. In other studies, AgNPs were also synthesized using bark extract of Saraca asoca [121], leaf extract of Boswellia sacra [16], and banana peel extract [122]. Similarly, Vitis vinifera [123], Andean blackberry [124], Adansonia digitata [125], Nitraria schoberi [126], or multiple fruit peels have also been reported for AgNPs synthesis [127]. Combinations of plant extracts have also been reported [128]. Furthermore, different parts of different plants, e.g., peel, seed, fruit, bark, flower, stem, and root, are also used in the nanoformulations of AgNPs [2,68].

6. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Microorganisms

Among the various biological sources for the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles, the green synthesis mediated by microorganisms has acquired a special place due to their high growth rate, ease of cultivation, and the ability to grow in ambient conditions of temperature, pH, and pressure [129]. Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and algae are of great interest in the synthesis of nanoparticles [68], although this process faces challenges such as cultural contamination, lengthy procedures, and less control over the size of nanoparticles (Figure 2) [2,130]. The synthesis of nanoparticles can be carried out both extracellularly and intracellularly using microbes [31,131]. Not all microorganisms are capable of producing metallic nanoparticles because they are produced by metabolic pathways and through cellular enzymes that may not be present in certain organisms [132].

6.1. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Bacteria

Diverse groups of bacteria inhabit the soil, water, plants, and animals. They can survive under various soil pH, salinity, temperature, and nutrient conditions. Some of these can occur in highly contaminated or hyper accumulated soils and plants [129]. The bacteria are known to possess the extraordinary ability to reduce heavy metal ions and are therefore considered one of the best candidates for the synthesis of AgNPs [13,20,68]. In the case of bacteria, the first synthesis of AgNPs was established using the strain Pseudomonas stutzeri AG259 that was isolated from a silver mine [133]. Several studies have reported the synthesis of AgNPs using bacteria [13]. According to studies, some bacterial species, such as Pseudomonas stutzeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are developing the ability to use specific defense mechanisms to overcome stresses like the toxicity of heavy metal ions or metals, and even survive and grow in the presence of high metal ion concentrations [134]. Klaus et al. [135] reported the synthesis of AgNPs with well-defined compositions and shapes using Pseudomonas stutzeri strain. This study was among the earliest studies that synthesized AgNPs using bacteria. Kalimuthu et al. [136] synthesized AgNPs using the biomass of the bacterium Bacillus licheniformis. Extracellular production is more prioritized than intracellular, which requires extraction and purification of AgNPs from the microbial growth [30,31,68]. In addition, the extracellular production was confirmed to include high amounts of proteins, which acted as capping agents [137]. Saravanan et al. [138] reported the extracellular biosynthesis of highly stable AgNPs using the culture supernatant of Bacillus megaterium NCIM 2326. Similarly, Nour El-Dein et al. [30] reported that the crude metabolite of Escherichia coli D8 (MF062579) was able to synthesize AgNPs within 1–2 min using a green and cost-effective method. Moreover, some important bacterial species that can contribute to the biosynthesis of AgNPs through intracellular and extracellular mechanisms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Actinobacter sp., Bacillus cereus, Lactobacillus spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [139]. A study by Shahverdi et al. [140] found the rapid biosynthesis of metallic silver nanoparticles by using the culture supernatants of Enterobacteriaceae strains. This is the first report focusing on the biosynthesis of AgNPs by using culture supernatants of different Enterobacteriaceae strains, including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter cloacae. Abdelmoneim et al. [31] were the first to report the synthesis of AgNPs using the culture supernatant of Leclercia adecarboxylata.

6.2. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Fungi

Fungi are another group of microorganisms that can be used as excellent sources of a wide variety of enzymes for the synthesis of different metallic nanoparticles, including AgNPs [26,141]. The synthesis of AgNPs by fungi has attracted more attention due to their economical large-scale production with controlled size and low residue toxicity [2,112,142]. The mechanism of synthesizing of nanoparticles using fungi could be intracellular or extracellular [13,112]. It has been reported that silver ions are reduced extracellularly in the presence of fungi to produce stable AgNPs in water [20,143]. Kathiresan et al. [144] reported the synthesis of AgNPs using the culture supernatants of Penicillium fellutanum isolated from coastal mangrove sediment. Jain et al. [145] synthesized AgNPs by extracellular synthesis methods using cell-free filtrate of Aspergillus flavus NJP08. A study by Ma et al. [146] reported the extracellular biosynthesis of AgNPs using the cell-free filtrate of the fungal strain Penicillium aculeatum Su1 as a reducing and stabilizing agent. Similarly, Lotfy et al. [147] reported that the mycelial filtrate of Aspergillus terreus BA6 was used to reduce AgNO3, which acts as an effective biofactory for the biosynthesis of AgNPs.

6.3. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Algae

Aquatic microorganisms, specifically algae, have been used and reported to synthesize AgNPs [26]. They range in size from microscopic (picoplankton) to macroscopic (Rhodophyta) [2]. Microalgae can be used as an efficient bionanofactory, able to produce metallic nanoparticles by reducing various metal ions such as silver, gold, and cadmium [148,149]. Both the live and dried biomass of microalgae can be used to synthesize metallic nanoparticles. Xie et al. [150] reported the biosynthesis of AgNPs using the extracted biomolecules of the unicellular green microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. In another study reported by Merin et al. [151], AgNPs were synthesized using the microalgae Chaetoceros calcitrans, Chlorella salina, Isochrysis galbana, and Tetraselmis gracilis. Prasad et al. [152] reported for the first time the synthesis of AgNPs using the extracts of the brown marine algae Cystophora moniliformis as a reducing and stabilizing agent. The biosynthesis of AgNPs was carried out extracellularly using a marine cyanobacterium, Oscillatoriawillei NTDM01, which reduced silver ions and stabilized the produced AgNPs with a secreted protein [129]. Several microalgae such as Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina platensis, and Lyngbya majuscule have been utilized for biosynthesis of AgNPs [149,153].

6.4. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Miscellaneous Sources

Recently, the use of DNA as a reducing agent has been driven by nanotechnology [2,14,76,154]. The high affinity of DNA bases for silver makes it a model stabilizer [155,156]. Kasyanenko et al. [157] reported that AgNPs were synthesized on DNA strands and found to be possibly located at the N7 guanine and phosphate. Another attempt was made with the DNA of the calf thymus to synthesize AgNPs [156,158].
Interest in the synthesis of nanomaterials by using a virus as the aid template is rising. The virus-mediated production of nanoparticles has been studied by researchers. Plant and animal viruses show a capacity for nanoparticle synthesis, but animal viruses are not studied very much as plant viruses due to safety concerns [159]. In addition, the various byproducts of plant metabolism can be utilized for the fabrication of nanoparticles, such as resins, gums, and biowaste of sugar crystallization “molasses” [159].
Several approaches highlighting the variety of natural sources utilized and the resulting characteristics of the AgNPs were summarized to provide a comparative overview of recent advancements in the green synthesis of AgNPs (Table 1).

6.5. Mechanism of Biosynthesis of AgNPs

The synthesis of AgNPs by biological entities is due to the presence of a large number of organic chemicals such as carbohydrates, fats, proteins, enzymes, coenzymes, phenols, flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, gum, etc., which are able to donate electrons for the reduction of Ag+ ions to Ag0 (Figure 3) [26]. The active ingredient that reduces of Ag+ ions varies depending on the organism or extract used. For the nanotransformation of AgNPs, electrons are thought to be derived from the dehydrogenation of acids (ascorbic acid) and alcohols (catechol) in hydrophytes, the conversions of keto to enol in mesophytes, or both mechanisms in xerophytes plants [179,180]. The microbial cellular and extracellular oxidoreductase enzymes can perform similar reduction processes [180,181].

7. Factors Affecting the Synthesis of AgNPs

Optimization of the factors affecting the characteristics of AgNPs is crucial for a more efficient and controllable synthesis process [36,147]. The main physical and chemical parameters influencing the synthesis of AgNPs are the reaction time, concentration of metal ions, reaction temperature, extract content, pH of the reaction mixture, substrate concentration, and agitation [26,181]. Parameters such as the reaction duration, the concentration of metallic ions, and the extract composition have a significant effect on the shape, morphology, and size of the AgNPs [14,182]. Salem and Fouda, Ref. [183] reported that the optimum concentrations of metal ions, temperature, and pH of the reaction mixture play a key role in the synthesis of nanoparticles. The pH of the reaction mixture has a significant effect on the growth of AgNPs because it changes the electrical charges of the biomolecules, probably affecting their reducing and capping properties [184,185,186]. Most researchers have reported the relevance of neutral or basic pH for the synthesis of AgNPs due to the better stability of the synthesized nanoparticles in basic medium [187,188,189,190]. Some other advantages mentioned regarding basic pH are rapid growth rate, good yield, monodispersity, and enhanced reduction process [14,181,191,192,193,194]. At low pH, aggregation occurs during nucleation, leading to the formation of large nanoparticles, whereas high pH has produced very stable small nanoparticles [26,186,195]. Small and uniform nanoparticles were synthesized by increasing the pH of the reaction mixture [194,196,197]. On the other hand, some researchers have indicated that an acidic pH is more favorable than an alkaline pH for the formation of AgNPs [198]. In this regard, Ibrahim [122] found that an acidic pH (4.5) was more appropriate for the synthesis of AgNPs using banana peel extract. Verma and Mehata [199] reported that absorption intensity was highest at a pH of 13, but caused instability and aggregation of AgNPs when kept overnight. The effect of pH on the synthesis of AgNPs could be also attributed to the availability of the reducing agents. It has been recorded that abundant reducing agent at elevated pH facilitates the reduction of silver ions into AgNPs, while the reduced concentration of the reducing agents at lower pH slows the silver ions reduction process [200].
The reaction conditions, such as time of stirring and reaction temperature, are also significant parameters. Many researchers used temperatures up to 100 °C for the synthesis of AgNPs using biopolymers and plant extracts, while the use of mesophilic microorganisms restricted the reaction temperature to 40 °C [181]. At higher temperatures, the mesophilic microorganisms die as a result of inactivating their vital enzymes. The increase in temperature (30 to 90 °C) resulted in an increase in the rate of the synthesis of AgNPs [68,201] and also favored the synthesis of smaller-sized AgNPs [202]. In general, most researchers synthesized AgNPs at room temperature (25 to 37 °C) [181,198]. We could attribute the change of the AgNP products at different temperatures to the effect of the applied temperature on the action of the reducing agent. It has been proved that the reaction of the reducing agent is accelerated at elevated temperatures resulting in variable rates of nanoparticles’ nucleation and growth [203].
Reaction time is also essential parameter that affects the synthesis of AgNPs [68]. The color change to brownish yellow and a peak SPR in the range 400–500 nm indicated the initiation of the formation of nanoparticles. In order to ensure the complete consumption of silver ions, reaction time plays an important role [198]. In general, the intensity of the absorbance peak increases with time as the number of nanoparticles increases [204,205]. The size, shape, and extent of the synthesis of AgNPs are strongly dependent on the concentration of silver ions [68]. The concentration of silver metal salt most commonly used was found at 1.0 mM [198]. However, other concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.75, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 20, 58.8, and 100 mM were also reported [198,206,207,208]. The absorption peak increases as the concentration of silver ions increases [31,209].

8. Characterization of AgNPs

The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles are important for their behavior, biological distribution, safety, and efficacy [94]. The special properties of AgNPs will determine their potential and application [68,210]. The shape, size, morphology, and surface area of the synthesized metallic nanoparticles are evaluated using various characterization techniques. These techniques include ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry (UV-Vis), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic field microscopy (AFM), zeta potential (ZP), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) [20,109,153]. Some important characterization techniques for evaluating AgNPs include UV-Vis, SEM, TEM, FTIR, and XRD [19,118,181]. The appearance of a yellow to slightly brownish-yellow color in the colorless solution was taken as an indication of the synthesis of AgNPs by almost all the researchers [181,211]. AgNPs have unique optical properties that make them strongly interact with specific wavelengths of light [94,212]. The SPR peak of the synthesized AgNPs was observed in the range of 400–450 nm, the significant range for AgNPs [213]. UV-vis spectroscopy is a very useful and reliable technique for the primary characterization of synthesized nanoparticles, which is used to monitor the synthesis and stability of AgNPs [94,214]. UV-vis spectroscopy is used as a characterization technique immediately after synthesizing AgNPs of size from 2 to 100 nm in the range wavelength of 300–800 nm [109,212,215]. TEM is a valuable, frequently used, and important technique for characterizing of nanomaterials, used to obtain quantitative measurements of particle and/or grain size, size distribution, and morphology [19,94,216,217]. SEM is a technique that uses electrons rather than light to form an output image [118]. SEM is a surface imaging technique fully capable of resolving different particle sizes, size distributions, nanomaterial shapes, and the surface morphology of the synthesized particles at the micro- and nanoscales [212,216,218,219]. Modern high-resolution SEM is capable of identifying the morphology of nanoparticles below 10 nm [94,212]. FTIR spectroscopy is frequently used to determine the possible functional groups of the biomolecules responsible for the reduction, capping, and efficient stabilization of AgNPs [211,220] and the local molecular environment of the capping agents on the nanoparticles [118]. FTIR dissects functional groups in various absorbance regions between 4000 and 400 cm−1 [221,222]. XRD is a useful tool for obtaining information about the atomic structure of materials. X-ray diffraction is one of the most extensive conventional methods for characterizing AgNPs. The crystallographic structure and morphology, which comprise the crystalline structure, lattice parameters, crystalline size, and the nature of the phase, are determined using the XRD technique [20,210]. X-rays are electromagnetic radiation, similar to light. However, X-rays have a much shorter wavelength compared to light. They are created when particles with electrical charges decelerate [221]. A comprehensive characterization is essential to confirm the synthesis, stability, and functional properties of AgNPs. Table 2 summarizes the key analytical techniques employed for this purpose, detailing the information each method provides.
A comparative table with most of the available parameters such as the synthesis method, particle size, polydispersity, zeta potential, and scalability challenges are represented (Table 3).

9. Stability, Aggregation, and Shelf Life of AgNPs

The stability and long-term efficacy of AgNPs are critically dependent on preventing their aggregation, which is a key challenge for their application and functional reliability. Due to high surface energy, AgNPs have a natural tendency to agglomerate, which can diminish their unique catalytic and antimicrobial properties by reducing the available surface area [230]. The stability of AgNPs in a suspension is commonly quantified using zeta potential measurements, which indicate the magnitude of the electrostatic repulsion between adjacent, similarly charged particles. A higher absolute zeta potential value, typically above ±30 mV, is indicative of a stable colloidal system, as the repulsive forces are strong enough to overcome the van der Waals attractive forces that lead to agglomeration [231]. Concurrently, the Polydispersity Index (PDI) is used to assess the uniformity of the nanoparticle population, with lower PDI values (ideally < 0.3) signifying a narrow size distribution and reduced likelihood of Ostwald ripening, a process where larger particles grow at the expense of smaller ones, thus affecting shelf life [232]. To achieve such stability, capping or stabilizing agents are employed to coat the nanoparticles. These agents, which can include polymers like PVP, polysaccharides such as chitosan, or citrate, provide electrostatic or steric repulsion between particles, thereby preventing them from clumping together and ensuring their stability in colloidal suspensions [233]. The choice of capping agent is crucial as it influences not only the stability but also the size, shape, and biological activity of the AgNPs [234]. For instance, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) has been shown to produce highly stable and small AgNPs with enhanced antibacterial activity [235]. The shelf life of AgNPs is also a significant consideration, as factors like oxidation, light exposure, and temperature can lead to degradation or re-nucleation over time, affecting their performance [26]. When these stabilized AgNPs are incorporated into polymeric nanofibers, the polymer matrix itself provides an additional layer of stabilization, physically entrapping the nanoparticles and preventing their migration and agglomeration, thereby ensuring a controlled and sustained release of silver ions and preserving the composite’s antimicrobial activity over time [236].

10. Applications of AgNPs

AgNPs are one of the most attractive materials for industrial applications. They have been widely used as antibacterial agents; electronic products in the electronic industries; textile coatings; food storage; and many other features show their potential in environmental applications [14,70,237]. AgNPs provide a broad range of potential uses due to their unique characteristics, including as antimicrobial, antiparasitic, and antifouling agents; as agents for site-specific medication, water purification systems [95,181], mosquito control, agriculture, food safety, and food packaging [20]; and so many other applications (Figure 4) [13]. AgNPs have also been broadly used as antibacterial coatings for therapeutic applications, such as cardiovascular implants, wound dressings, catheters, orthopaedic implants, dental composites, nanobiosensing, and agriculture engineering [130,238]. Furthermore, AgNPs were used in the medical, plastics and textile industries [56]. Although AgNPs are used in a variety of applications, such as conductors [239], thin films [240], batteries [241], energy harvesting [242], and surface coatings [243], medical applications have received the most attention due to the rise of life-threatening diseases worldwide and multidrug resistance challenges in non-specific drug delivery [98,238].

11. Mechanism of Antimicrobial Activity of AgNPs

Microorganisms are potent and known to develop resistance to various antibiotics. However, as a result of the recent increase in bacterial resistance to various antibiotics, alternative therapeutic agents that are non-toxic to humans but toxic to microorganisms are urgently needed. Therefore, there is a strong case for the development of nanoparticle-mediated antimicrobial agents [13]. AgNPs are highly toxic to broad ranges of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [14,244,245]. The antibacterial action of AgNPs on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains is not the same but competes one over the other [76,181].
The antimicrobial activity of AgNPs can be attributed to the fact that smaller particles have a greater surface area available for interaction and will have more bactericidal effects than the larger particles [26,118,246]. Several mechanisms have been described for the antimicrobial activity of AgNPs (Figure 5) [247]. The interaction of nanoparticles with microorganisms begins with the adhesion of nanoparticles to the microbial cell wall and membrane. This adhesion is based on the electrostatic attraction between the negatively charged microbial cell membrane and the positively or less negatively charged nanoparticles [248,249,250]. After adhesion, morphological changes in the membrane structure are induced by the nanoparticles, thereby resulting in disruption of membrane permeability and respiratory functions through membrane depolarization, and ultimately disruption of the cell structure and cell death [250,251]. Moreover, nanoparticles have been reported to cause irregular pit formations on the cell wall, which further help the nanoparticles to enter into the periplasmic space and finally inside the cell [26,252].
After the interaction of nanoparticles with bacterial cells, peripheral damages and dense cavities on the cell surface can be observed [14,253,254]. AgNPs toxicity is also induced by the formation of free radicals, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) [26,76,255]. The ROS include superoxide (O2¯), hydroxyl (OH), hypochlorous acid (HOCl), peroxy (RCOO), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). AgNPs promote the production of ROS, which can cause membrane disruption and disturb the permeability [36,98]. These free radicals damage the cell wall and biomolecules such as enzymes, proteins, lipids, and DNA [248,256]. ROS, or oxidative stress, forms and causes bacterial death [257]. AgNPs can disrupt proteins and phosphorus in the bacterial cell and destabilize ribosomal and DNA functions [258,259]. AgNPs are capable of interfering with the respiratory chain and cell division, which resulting in cell death [40,259,260]. It was also found that Ag+ ions produced from the AgNPs react with phosphorus, resulting in the stopping of DNA replication, or react with proteins containing sulfur, inhibiting the enzymatic functions [76,261]. Moreover, the binding of Ag+ ions and the proteins containing sulfur causes the breakdown of the bacterial cell walls and disturbs the mechanism of protein synthesis [98,100].
The integration of AgNPs into polymer matrices significantly influences their antimicrobial activity and can be tailored for specific applications. Polymer coatings, such as those made from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or polyurethane (PU), can enhance the stability of AgNPs by preventing their aggregation and improving their adhesion to surfaces [262]. This allows for a controlled and sustained release of silver ions, providing long-term antimicrobial action [36]. Encapsulating AgNPs within a polymer network can also reduce their cytotoxicity to human cells by limiting direct exposure while still allowing for the slow release of antimicrobial silver ions [36]. The choice of polymer and the method of integration can be optimized to control the release rate of silver ions and the overall effectiveness of the antimicrobial material [263]. For instance, hydrophilic polymers can facilitate the generation of silver ions, which is crucial for the antimicrobial activity of AgNPs in dry environment [262]. Furthermore, the surface charge of the polymer can influence the interaction with microbial membranes, with some studies showing that certain polymer coatings can enhance the bactericidal effect [264].

12. Polymeric Nanofiber–Nanosilver Composites

A composite is a material consisting of two or more different solid phases with distinguishable chemical, physical, structural, or biological properties [265]. As a result, a new class of only modified materials was created. The excess component in the form of a dispersion medium is normally known as a matrix. However, the other component, which is in the form of a scattered phase, is filler. Nanocomposites are formed when the fillers are either formed in situ or supplied ex situ with a particle size ranging between 1 and 100 nm along at least one dimension [266,267]. Nanocomposites are multiphase materials in which one phase contains nanoscale additives [266,268]. They are expected to show unusual properties resulting from the combination of each component. It has been classified into polymer matrix nanocomposites, polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites, ceramic-polymer nanocomposites, inorganic–organic polymer nanocomposites, and inorganic–organic hybrid polymer nanocomposites [54,269,270]. Polymer matrix nanocomposites are materials in which inorganic nanoparticles ranging in size from 10 to 100 nm must be dispersed in a polymer matrix [54]. Polymer nanoparticles have attracted the attention of researchers. Both in bulk and in solution, the materials offer unique thermal, optical, mechanical, and electrical properties. This significant improvement in the properties is due to the presence of nanoparticles and, their interaction with polymers, and the dispersion status [36,271]. Polymers, which are frequently used in medicine and the packaging industry, seem to be the most suitable matrices [33].
Although nanoparticles have limited applications, those applications will dramatically expand if they are embedded in a matrix [33,272]. The incorporation of inorganic or organic materials improves and combines the properties of both phases in the final product [273]. Incorporating nanoparticles in polymer nanofibers has attracted considerable attention due to the possibilities of fabricating suitable materials for applications as catalysts, drug deliveries, medical gauzes, sensors, and gas separation or filtration nets [250,274], and antibacterial electrospun mats [275]. Nanoparticles can be incorporated into the polymer matrix in a variety of ways. In general, they can be divided into two main groups: in situ [20,276,277] and ex situ [278,279]. The manner in which the nanoparticles were inserted into the polymer matrix differs between these two techniques; in the in situ techniques, nanoparticles are generated directly in the polymer matrix from the entering components that react together. While producing polymer composites by ex situ techniques, prefabricated nanoparticles with defined size, shape, and quantity are introduced to the prepared polymer matrix [33]. Figure 6 is illustrating the differences in the in situ and ex situ preparation methods of AgNPs in addition to the difference in their aggregation.
AgNPs are used in pristine form or in combination with other materials for a variety of reasons, particularly in the biomedical field, with the advancement in the field of nanotechnology in many engineered products such as clothing, respirators, water filters, soaps, contraceptives, antibacterial sprays, and detergent, as well as in numerous household products [280]. Silver-containing nanofibers can be used as films, coatings, and fibers in electronics, sensors, filters, catalytic materials, water treatment, and food packaging due to the merits of both advantages of the antibacterial and optical enhancing properties of AgNPs and the high surface area and surface energy of nanofibers [34,281]. These composites containing AgNPs with multifunctional properties have a high scope for use as antimicrobial agents [250]. Moreover, they can also be used in the targeted delivery of drugs at a specific site [282,283].

13. Nanofibers

Nanofibers are ultra-fine solid fibers notable for their very small diameters (lower than 100 nm) [284], their large surface area per unit of mass, and their small pore size [285,286]. Nanofibers can be considered nanostructures, and this category of nanomaterials includes nanotubes as well as nanorods. Furthermore, nanofibers can contain nanoparticles in their bulk or on their surface, forming so-called nanofibrous composite materials [38]. Nanofibers, surface-functionalized with AgNPs, have attracted attention as an effective antimicrobial material [287,288,289]. Nanofibers produced from synthetic and natural polymers have drawn more attention among the diverse nanostructures that have recently been developed for use in practical applications, due to their ease of fabrication and the ability to control their compositional, structural, and functional properties [290,291,292,293]. In addition, due to numerous environmental concerns, current research focuses on the use of biodegradable polymers to develop various biomedical applications and components for environmental protection [294,295,296]. Currently, biodegradable and biocompatible polymers, such as collagen, alginate, chitosan, cellulose acetate (CA), gelatin, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polylactic acid (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polybutylene succinate (PBS), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and copolymers are used extensively to fabricate nanofibers [38,292,297,298].

14. Polymer Nanocomposites

Nanoscience and nanotechnology offer unique opportunities to create innovative combinations of nanoscale fillers and polymeric materials to obtain polymer nanocomposites with interesting properties [269,299]. Recent studies have further explored the incorporation of nanoparticles like Ag, ZnO, and TiO2 into PVA nanofibers, enhancing their antibacterial, mechanical, and thermal properties [269].
The choice of the polymer is an important point for obtaining fibers that can meet the demands of each application [272]. Usually, synthetic polymers exhibit reproducible behavior during electrospinning and provide highly uniform nanofiber mats [43]. Hydrophobic synthetic polymers allow for the preparation of mats that maintain their structure upon contact with aqueous media, and thus they have been extensively tested for liquid filtration [272,292,300]. Biopolymers, or naturally occurring polymers, have the advantages of being digestible or bioerodible, more biocompatible, and less immunogenic than synthetic polymers [43,301]. Many biopolymers are under investigation for production of electrospun mats containing AgNPs because of the antimicrobial activity in medical and healthcare nanofibers [36,302].
PVA is one of the most suitable polymers [303] that can be easily combined with natural polymers and crosslinked to make hydrogels since it is a semi-crystalline, biocompatible, non-toxic, hydrophilic polymer that also has excellent chemical and thermal stability and remarkable electrospinnability [304,305]. PVA is a polyhydroxy polymer that is water-soluble and has good fiber forming ability, biocompatibility, chemical resistance, and biodegradability [275,298,306,307]. Several researchers have reported electrospinning of PVA solutions [302,308], and PVA has been reported in numerous publications to be a good choice for preparing colloidal suspensions due to its significant advantages such as processability and high transmittance [309,310].
In order to enhance the functionality of the nanofibrous scaffolds, PVA is often combined with cyclodextrins (CDs) [311]. CDs are a family of cyclic oligosaccharides with a cyclic molecular structure, and are composed of cyclic α (1, 4) linked pyridoglycan units. The three most common natural CDs contain 6, 7, or 8 units of glucopyranose in the cycle and are termed α-CD, β-CD, and γ-CD, respectively [42,44,312,313]. Although they are not polymers, CDs have attractive features when incorporated into electrospun fibers [43]. The CDs are considered one of the pioneers of super molecules with broad applications in various fields, such as host–guest interaction, molecular recognition, drug delivery, enzyme catalysis, foods, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, home/personal care, textiles, and pesticides [44,314]. The functionalization of nanofibers with cyclodextrins will provide unique properties for traditional composite fibers. For instance, nanofibers can be used for filtering tiny particles as well as acting as barriers for liquid/vapor penetration due to the large surface area of their nanoporous structure [315,316]. Furthermore, the hydrophobic cavity of CDs enables them to form host–guest complexes with different small molecules and macromolecules [312]. Among these CDs, β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), composed of seven glucose units with a moderately truncated cone-shaped hole, is commercially available and has been widely used in industry [317]. β-CD possess a toroid structure with a lipophilic inner surface and a hydrophilic outer surface that make them efficient materials for the formation of non-covalent host–guest inclusion complexes with a wide range of organic and inorganic molecules [42,318,319]. The addition of β-CD in polymer nanofibers would be extremely attractive since composites have a novel feature that can potentially improve the application areas of nanofibers [7]. Many researchers have attempted to modulate the function of polymeric scaffolds by combining various types of polymers. Dos Santos et al. [320] reported that CDs enhanced stability during the spinning process of PVA/β-CD. The β-CD functionalized nanofibers and their assemblies have potential applications in biomedical fields due to their high aqueous solubility, low toxicity, and fewer side effects [311,321]. Furthermore, β-CD easily reacts with cross-linking agents to give hyper-cross-linked polymers that are water-insoluble [318]. Recent studies have also explored the preparation and characterization of β-cyclodextrin grafted chitosan nanofibers via electrospinning for dye removal, indicating the expanding applications of CD-functionalized nanofibers [322]
Polyethylene oxide (PEO) is a crystalline, thermoplastic polymer. Unlike many other polymer systems, PEO is commercially available in a wide range of molecular weights. PEO is colorless, odorless, and stable against heat and hydrolysis, acts as an inert substance for many chemical reagents, and is a non-toxic polymer. PEO is an excellent candidate for biomedical applications because of its biocompatibility, non-immunogenicity, and interesting physicochemical characteristics [323]. It is particularly appropriate for use as scaffolds in tissue engineering [324,325,326] and biocompatible coatings [327,328], as well as other wide application fields, such as filtration for CO2 separations [329], and energy storage applications [330]. PEO, in small amounts, acts as a plasticizer in electrospinning processes [324,331]. Fortunately, even the negligible presence of PEO (up to 2%) in the solutions of the materials that, in their pure forms cannot be electrospun, such as chitosan, keratin, and other protein-based materials, completely changes their disposition to be electrospun [332].
To combine the advantages of various polymers and overcome their limitations, the desired properties were obtained by using mixtures of these polymers instead of single polymers by optimizing the ratio between the components of the mixture [333]. By combining the advantages of PVA, PEO, and β-CD, it is expected that PVA/PEO/β-CD hybrid scaffolds will have strong mechanical features, biocompatibility, and biodegradability properties. This will offer more desirable properties and functionality for applications in various fields. Thus, the properties of electrospun scaffolds can be tailored with desired new functions by selecting a combination of appropriate components and adjusting the component ratio. In addition to taking advantage of the material’s compositions, the fabrication process, through which the fiber diameter, morphology, and scaffold porosity can be manipulated, also plays an important role on the properties and functionality of the scaffolds [334]. PVA, PEO, and β-CD are well known as non-toxic, biodegradable, and water-soluble materials [317,335,336]. These features are essential for many applications, such as nanoagriculture, tissue engineering, and other biomedical applications [337]. The slow biodegradation rate of PEO compared to PVA and PVA/PEO/β-CD blends makes it the preferable polymer to utilize in applications where the release rate of active materials, such as drugs, fertilizers [338], and active metal NPs embedded in the nanofibers, must be controlled for long time periods.
Nanofiber membranes are prepared by the electrospinning process of polymers, and the application possibilities are limited to fiber scaffolds [339]. The production of antimicrobial nanofibers generally follows the strategy of incorporating biocide into the fibers. This can be achieved by uniformly mixing the active agent in the polymer solution before electrospinning, entrapping the active agent in the fiber core by coaxial electrospinning, entrapping the active agent in nanostructures before dispersing it in the electrospinning solution, or attaching the active agent to the surface of the fiber. Until now, various active substances, including antibiotics, biocides, metallic nanoparticles, metal oxide nanoparticles, and natural bioactive compounds, have been used [38]. Thus, various functional nanofiber membranes have been prepared by electrospinning in combination with multifunctional materials, among which nanofiber–nanoparticle hybrids show great potential to combine the advantages of nanoparticles with the properties of polymers [333]. For instance, functional composite nanofibers can be produced by incorporation of metal nanoparticles, such as silver or gold, into electrospun polymeric nanofibers [340,341,342]. AgNPs have attracted considerable attention due to their unique optical, electronic, catalytic and antimicrobial properties [259,343,344]. AgNPs/polymer composites, which function as bactericides, have been applied to complicated cases of infected burns, purulent wounds, and wound healing matrix [14,345]. Several studies aimed at incorporation of AgNPs within electrospun nanofibers which can enable production of functional nanofibrous composites by combining the unique properties of nanofibers with that of AgNPs [321,346,347]. Yang et al. [274] first prepared ultrafine polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers containing AgNPs via electrospinning. Andrade et al. [313] reported that β-CD-coated AgNPs reduced more than 99% E. coli as compared to pristine β-CD. Celebioglu et al. [348] developed an electrospun AgNP/β-CD nanofiber composite membrane, which showed good antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Also, Celebioglu et al. [321] reported that the electrospun PVA/hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβ-CD) nanofibers incorporating AgNPs were successfully electrospun. Furthermore, the synthesis of nanofibers composed of AgNPs and PVA has attracted increasing attention due to their unique physical and chemical properties. The AgNP/PVA hybrid nanofibers show various applications as sensors, antimicrobial materials, wound dressings, catalytic agents, and dye-sensitized solar cells [349]. For all of the above reasons, PVA containing AgNPs is appropriate for the application of antimicrobial benefits, so that the method for synthesis of PVA loaded with AgNPs is under consideration by scientists [345]. Hong, [350] engineered PVA-based mats containing AgNPs by means of a precursory solution of the corresponding polymer and AgNO3 with a subsequent thermal or ultraviolet (UV) posttreatment. The PVA-based mats produced exhibited excellent antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Although the water solubility of PVA might be a drawback when using it as a wound dressing, this can be overcome by simple thermal treatment without having a negative effect on the final properties. Li et al. [351] also reported that electrospun composite nanofibers comprised of PVA/chitosan/AgNPs can effectively be used as a wound dressing agent due to its proven effectiveness in inhibiting bacterial growth. Other research related to the fabrication of nanofibers in the presence of AgNPs has been reported. For example, He et al. [41] successfully developed feather keratin/poly (vinyl alcohol)/poly (ethylene oxide) (FK/PVA/PEO) composite nanofibers using the electrospinning process. These nanofibers exhibited antibacterial activities against both Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria. Nguyen et al. [345] synthesized AgNP/PVA nanofibers and tested their antibacterial activity toward Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli. Furthermore, Hamza et al. [352] successfully fabricated AgNP/PVA/zinc oxide (ZnO) nanofiber mats using the electrospinning technique. They also found that the AgNP/PVA/ZnO nanofibers exhibited better antibacterial efficiency compared to the PVA nanofibers. Therefore, electrospun composite nanofiber scaffolds functionalized with AgNPs are considered an important asset in future medicine [280]. Also, George et al. [347] successfully fabricated casein/polyvinyl alcohol (CAN/PVA) films and nanocomposites functionalized with AgNPs using a solution casting technique. The nanofibers and films were functionalized by incorporating AgNPs to formulate smart materials for enhanced non-linear applications.
Nanofibers can be prepared using various techniques, including electrospinning, drawing, template synthesis, phase separation, and self-assembly [14]. The electrospinning method was found to be one of the most efficient, straightforward, and versatile due to its relatively simple and cost-effective setup [292,342,343,353].

15. Electrospinning

Since the 1930s, electrospinning has been applied to produce various nanofibrous fabrics for various applications including filters, semi-permeable membranes, skin masks, clothing, and medical materials [354]. So far, nanofibrous scaffolds have been fabricated using phase separation, self-assembly, and electrospinning [355]. Among them, the electrospinning process has attracted considerable interest since it produces nanofibrous scaffolds with high porosity and an adjustable pore size distribution [356]. Electrospinning is a versatile technology to produce polymer nanofibers from solutions or melts using electrostatic forces (Figure 7) [286,295,357]. The electrospinning process is simple, cheap, and easy. Therefore, it has been used as an efficient method to produce ultra-fine nanofibers [61,358]. These nanofibers have excellent properties such as an extra-large surface to volume ratio, small fiber diameters, a porous surface, and a more functional surface [296,359]. Therefore, they can be applied in several fields, such as filters, wound dressing, protective clothes, medical fields, sensors, drug delivery, tissue engineering, cosmetics, and biomedical fields [61,360,361,362,363,364].
A polymer solution is electrospun into a continuous filament under a high-voltage electric field. Then these filaments are deposited on the collector [36]. This process depends on several factors, such as viscosity, surface tension, and solution conductivity [342,365,366]. Electrospinning enables the efficient fabrication of fibers with diameters ranging from a few nanometers to several micrometers. The electrospun nanofiber mats have a high surface area per unit mass, high porosity, and high gas permeability. Due to the listed characteristics, nanofibers have found numerous applications in different areas of daily life [38,286].

16. Application of Polymeric AgNP–Nanofiber Composites

Polymer matrix-based nanocomposites attract attention in various research fields because of their numerous and vast applications, such as in construction and infrastructural materials, biomedical fields, aerospace and automobile parts, textile industries, etc. [266,269]. They can be found in everything, from tiny objects like chopsticks to larger ones like trash bins, or from fundamental structural components to well-established technological equipment. All this is due to the diversity of their characteristics [266]. Many electrospun antimicrobial fibers are based on metal or metal oxide nanoparticles (such as silver, copper, ZnO, or TiO2) that have been utilized on a macroscale for centuries [38,367]. These nanofibers are an example of new delivery systems based on the reservoir concept, in which the polymer structure surrounds the reservoir with a release rate governed by the rate of polymer degradation, the rate of diffusion, or the detachment of the surface coating [368]. With the merits of the AgNPs’ properties and the high surface-to-volume ratio of nanofibers, the application of the AgNPs–nanofibers has developed significantly [34]. The most well-known antimicrobial nanostructures are AgNPs, which exhibit a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity [36,367,369] and a rare incidence of resistance [370]. Due to the unique antimicrobial bioactivity of AgNPs, AgNP–nanofiber structures can be widely used in many applications, which becomes important especially in the biomedical industry [36,210].

16.1. Antimicrobial Materials

Polymer-based metallic nanoparticles are widely explored for their versatility, biodegradability, eco-friendliness, and nature biocompatibility [371]. Recently, with the misuse of antibiotics, different types of drug-resistant bacteria emerged [372], and the combination of various types of polymer-based metallic nanoparticles can also generate excellent antibacterial capability against drug-resistant bacteria [333]. The accumulation of AgNPs in mitochondria results in mitochondrial dysfunction. In addition, AgNPs disrupt the DNA structure, leading to non-replication and effective suppression of bacterial multiplication. These two fundamental factors lead AgNPs to possess a powerful bactericidal potential [34]. Many items such as textiles, keyboards, and medical devices now contain AgNPs that continuously release small amounts of Ag+ to provide antimicrobial protection [373]. AgNPs have also been used to develop various bioactive materials, including polymer composites, due to their high antimicrobial activity [17]. Antimicrobial activity studies were typically performed using diffusion techniques, and showed that AgNP-loaded nanofibers exhibited excellent antimicrobial properties against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [35,36,38,374].
The antimicrobial activity of AgNPs is dependent on the nanomaterial’s surface area [375]. The highest concentrations of released Ag+ ions were observed from AgNPs with the largest surface area. In contrast, the low release of Ag+ ions was found for AgNPs with small surface area, resulting in weak antimicrobial properties [376]. Most electrospun nanofibers have no effect on the reproduction of microbial cells by their own, but only in the presence of AgNPs [34]. For instance, according to Shi et al. [377] pure nylon 6 nanofiber has no antibacterial activity, but when AgNPs are incorporated into the polymer matrix, it exhibits a 99.9% inhibition to E. coli at a silver precursor concentration of 0.5 weight% and a 99.999% inhibition at a concentration of 1.25 weight%. These characteristics make the silver-containing nanofibers an excellent candidate for biotextiles and wound dressings [34]. Also, Rzayev et al. [378] reported that poly (vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate)/octadecyl amine-montmorillonite) (P(VA-co-VAc)/ODA-MMT) nanofibers loaded with AgNPs showed strong antimicrobial activity against fungi (Candida albicans, tropicalis, glabrata, keyfr, and krusei) and bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli).
Although, there is a lot of debate about which molecule is responsible for causing microbial cell kill—is it the Ag+ or the AgNPs?—many authors attribute the primary antimicrobial activity to the dissolved Ag+ released by AgNPs, as the smaller particles are dissolved faster, creating higher numbers of silver ions near the microbial cells, which enhances the killing process [379]. However, others show that direct contact with AgNPs can damage the membranes, generate ROS at the particle surface, and disrupt the formed biofilm. All these actions were reported for AgNPs even when the silver ions were controlled or matched. Recent comparative studies have concluded that both released Ag+ and particle-specific interactions play a role [380,381,382]. On the other hand, some researchers reported multiple risks from these nanoparticles, including ROS-mediated injury in mammalian and endothelial cells, lysosomal and mitochondrial damage, and autography disruption; however, the magnitude varies according to the size and the coatings of the nanoparticles [383,384]. However, regarding food-contact contexts, the scientists of the FDA reported that the reducing ingredients in foods can generate and transform the silver particles at the interface, and will potentially alter the exposure of consumers compared with neat lab media [385]. For these reasons of risk potential, polymer matrices, coatings of AgNPs, and storage conditions can be adapted to limit the migration of the nanoparticles while preserving the antimicrobial surfaces. Both the EFSA and the FDA highlighted in their interval guidance and reassessments that the key uncertainties demand standardized ion-release testing in complex foods, determination of the long-term storage effects on dissolution, and regular hazard assessment of the harmonized dose metrics [386].

16.2. Wound Dressings

In comparison to cotton gauze dressings, metallic nanocomposite scaffolds made from polymer matrices are found to be more advantageous. Cotton dressings are known as passive dressings since they only served as a structural framework material to cover the infected wounds [266]. But recently, bioactive and interactive dressing materials in the form of films, hydrogels, and sponges are being identified to benefit the process of wound healing [387]. AgNPs have a wide antibacterial spectrum covering aerobic, anaerobic, and Gram amphoteric bacteria [388], a low incidence of resistance [389], and persistent antibacterial activity [390], so they have been frequently used in antibacterial wound dressings [12,34,391]. Abdelgawad et al. [392] reported that the PVA/chitosan–AgNP nanomaterial mats have been developed for antimicrobial applications. The PVA/CS-AgNP mats have shown good antibacterial activity against E. coli, which promotes good wound dressing material. In addition, according to Anisha et al. [393] AgNP/chitosan–hyaluronic acid (sponge) was synthesized as a dressing material against diabetic foot ulcers. The antibacterial activity was tested against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The results obtained have suggested the applicability of composite sponges as a dressing material for diabetic foot ulcers and infected wounds. Furthermore, the researchers compared the antibacterial properties of silver-containing nanofibers with other polymers commonly used for wound healing without the presence of AgNPs. The results show that PVP/CNC/Ag nanofiber composites showed improved antibacterial activity against both S. aureus and E. coli than the PVP/CNC nanofiber composite [394].

16.3. Food Packaging Materials

Polymer-based metallic nanoparticles used for food packaging applications can be natural biopolymers with inorganic metal/metal oxide nanoparticles. Metal/metal oxide nanoparticles of silver, gold, copper, and zinc usually impart antimicrobial property and are utilized to develop antimicrobial food packaging products [14,266]. In order to delay food spoilage or bacterial contamination, AgNP-loaded electrospun membranes with antibacterial properties have been tested in food packaging materials [390,395]. For instance, Chaudhary et al. [395] used an electrospun AgNP/PAN composite filter media to cover a nutrient media under room conditions and allow ambient air to pass through the filter media. After two months, the nutrient media protected by the nanofibrous filter maintained free of bacterial growth, while the unprotected nutrient media exhibited microbial growth. Also, Castro-Mayorga et al. [396] reported electrohydrodynamic processing to create a multilayer system consisting of a poly (hydroxy alkanoate) (PHA) substrate and an electrospun PHA coating containing AgNPs, taking advantage of the AgNP-loaded electrospun nanofibers that could prevent microbial outbreaks in food packages and food contact surfaces. The produced materials reduced the Salmonella enterica population below the detection limits at a very low silver loading of 0.002% wt.

16.4. Antimicrobial Nanopaints

The applications of nanomaterials with antimicrobial properties are not limited to therapeutic applications but are also useful for the development of antimicrobial products such as coatings and water filters [397]. It is profitable to combine AgNPs with polymer matrix to form multifunctional composite coatings, which could be used in antimicrobial applications [398]. In the application of AgNP/polymer nanopaints, AgNPs are produced in a polymer solution using a one-step method, followed by a drying process. The resulting drying oil containing AgNPs is a good coating material that can be applied to different surfaces, including glass, wood, and polystyrene [399]. The surface covered with the nanopaints shows excellent antibacterial properties by killing both Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria [399]. For instance, nanosilver-based wall paint would prevent the growing of mold inside buildings and the growth of algae on outside walls [400].

16.5. Water Filtration and Treatment

Among the various types of nanosized antimicrobial materials, namely ZnO, CuO, and TiO2, the AgNPs have been reported as the most effective antimicrobial agents [21,275,401,402]. When paired with hydrogen-bonded multilayers assembled on magnetic microspheres, it can be delivered and located in a specific region without contaminating the environment by using magnetic fields [403]. A bifunctional Fe3O4 and AgNPs composite with superparamagnetic and antibacterial properties has been prepared and proven to have excellent antibacterial ability against E. coli, S. epidermis, and B. subtilis [404]. In addition to the advantages of supermagnetism, which allows easy removal of the materials from water, mesoporous polymer nanofiber membranes can be designed with specific pore sizes and desired filtration properties to enhance the efficiency of water treatment and their recyclability. The nanocomposites of supermagnetics/AgNPs/polymer nanofibers can be a promising water disinfectant [404,405].

16.6. Catalyst for Hydrolysis/Electrolysis of Polymer Matrix

Accelerating the hydrolysis of bulk material is another application for incorporating AgNPs into polymer nanofibers. During the fabrication of AgNP/polymer composites, AgNPs exhibit remarkable catalytic properties for the hydrolysis and electrolysis of organic materials [406,407]. Furthermore, the catalytic activity can be adapted by controlling the size of silver particles and the polymer matrix. In general, the smaller particle size has a higher catalytic activity [407] with a greater number of reaction sites per surface area [408]. This size dependence becomes even more important when the particle size is reduced at the nanoscale. According to studies, AgNPs were synthesized and subsequently incorporated in the polymer matrix of polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) for the preparation of the AgNP/PVAc nanocomposite [409]. By adding AgNPs to a polymer matrix, the hydrolysis of this hybrid material can be accelerated. As a result of their strong bond with the PVAc polymer chain, the AgNPs can continue to function as a catalyst even when the polymer chains’ backbones are broken during hydrolysis. AgNPs cause the hydrophobic PVAc polymer to become hydrophilic and dissolve in particular solvents, leading to accelerated hydrolysis.

17. Future Perspectives and Limitations

Despite a number of technical obstacles, future studies on green-synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and AgNP-incorporated polymeric nanofibers are expected to advance toward standardization, scalability, and multifunctional integration. Regulatory acceptance and reproducibility are complicated by the synthesis side of plant- and microbe-mediated AgNP production, which is still plagued by batch-to-batch variability in phytochemical content, incomplete reporting of quantitative parameters (yield, polydispersity index, zeta potential), and a lack of mechanistic understanding of Ag+ release versus particle-driven effects. Better control over nanoparticle dispersion, aggregation prevention, and long-term stability under real-world conditions like humidity, UV exposure, and mechanical stress are necessary for both ex situ and in situ incorporation techniques for polymeric nanofibers. Real-world research paths include (1) creating omics-guided strain or plant selection for predictable capping chemistry; (2) incorporating real-time ion-release monitoring into antimicrobial performance tests; (3) developing solvent-minimized, scalable electrospinning and melt-processing routes that are compatible with green AgNPs; and (4) creating interfaces between polymers and nanoparticles that modulate Ag+ release rates to meet safety thresholds without sacrificing efficacy. The biggest technical challenges are harmonizing international regulatory standards for nano-enabled materials, migration testing under complex-use scenarios (such as food-contact, biomedical), and scalable process control for uniform size/composition. Multidisciplinary efforts integrating toxicology, green chemistry, nanomaterials engineering, and regulatory science into an iterative, application-specific development cycle will be necessary to address these.

18. Conclusions

Nanotechnology, especially the development and application of AgNPs, has emerged as a promising field in biological and nanomedical research. AgNPs exhibit significant antimicrobial properties, making them valuable in the design of advanced products, such as wound dressings, medical implants, and biosensors. Green-synthesized AgNPs and their polymeric nanofiber composites represent a major advancement in nanotechnology. Recent progress in the synthesis of AgNPs highlights the potential for more sustainable and eco-friendly production methods that avoid hazardous chemicals. Moreover, the incorporation of AgNPs into polymeric nanofiber composites offers a powerful strategy to enhance stability and allows the development of functional materials with enhanced antimicrobial activity, biodegradability, and non-toxicity, which are essential for various applications ranging from advanced wound dressings to water purification systems. The development of AgNP-based nanocomposites with tailored properties remains an exciting area of research, with significant implications for medicine and environmental protection. While AgNPs and their composites hold great promise for a wide range of applications, ongoing research is crucial to overcome existing limitations. By advancing the understanding of their biological interactions, optimizing production methods, and ensuring their safety, AgNP-based materials could become integral components in numerous products. Future research must address the urgent need of scalable and cost-effective green synthesis, as many current methods lack high-yield production suitable for industrial applications. Ensuring the long-term stability and shelf life of AgNP-based composites is another critical hurdle, since aggregation and degradation can reduce effectiveness over time. Most importantly, a deeper understanding of the potential nanotoxicity is required, including the environmental effects of silver ion leaching and the implications for human health—factors central to regulatory approval. Overcoming these challenges in synthesis, stability, and safety is crucial to unlocking the full transformative potential of AgNPs and their composites. Continued research in this field promises further innovations in sustainable and effective nanomaterials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.A. and T.H.T.; software, H.M.A., T.H.T. and F.M.A.; validation, A.M.A. and A.A.F.; formal analysis, H.B.; investigation, S.A.A.; resources, F.M.A., A.M.A. and A.A.F.; data curation, H.M.A., H.B. and T.H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.A.; writing—review and editing, H.M.A., F.M.A., A.M.A., A.A.F., H.B., S.A.A. and T.H.T.; funding acquisition, T.H.T. and A.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2501).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Verma, A.; Tyagi, S.; Verma, A.; Singh, J.; Joshi, P. Optimization of Different Reaction Conditions for the Bio-Inspired Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Extract of Solanum nigrum Leaves. J. Nanomater. Mol. Nanotechnol. 2017, 6, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmad, S.; Munir, S.; Zeb, N.; Ullah, A.; Khan, B.; Ali, J.; Bilal, M.; Omer, M.; Alamzeb, M.; Salman, S.M.; et al. Green Nanotechnology: A Review on Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles—An Ecofriendly Approach. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 5087–5107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mathur, A.; Mathur, A.; Mishra, P.K.; Srivastava, A.K.; Kumar, Y. Multifunctional Materials for Nanotechnology. In Multifunctional Materials; Tripathy, D.B., Gupta, A., Kumar Jain, A., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2025; pp. 181–206. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pallavi, S.S.; Rudayni, H.A.; Bepari, A.; Niazi, S.K.; Nayaka, S. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Streptomyces hirsutus Strain SNPGA-8 and Their Characterization, Antimicrobial Activity, and Anticancer Activity against Human Lung Carcinoma Cell Line A549. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Birla, S.S.; Gaikwad, S.C.; Gade, A.K.; Rai, M.K. Rapid Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Fusarium oxysporum by Optimizing Physicocultural Conditions. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 796018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Manisekaran, R.; Chettiar, A.R.; Marasamy, L.; Ibarra, V.C.; Lopez-Ayuso, C.A.; Chavez-Granados, P.A.; Kandasamy, G.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Arthikala, M. Silver-Nanoparticles-Based Composites for Antimicrobial Applications: An Update. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202403772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Bai, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J. Ag Nanoparticle-Embedded One-Dimensional β-CD/PVP Composite Nanofibers Prepared via Electrospinning for Use in Antibacterial Material. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2012, 290, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Govindaraju, K.; Tamilselvan, S.; Kiruthiga, V.; Singaravelu, G. Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles by Solanum torvum and Their Promising Antimicrobial Activity. J. Biopestic. 2010, 3, 394–399. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alexander, J.W. History of the Medical Use of Silver. Surg. Infect. 2009, 10, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ebrahiminezhad, A.; Raee, M.J.; Manafi, Z.; Sotoodeh Jahromi, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Ancient and Novel Forms of Silver in Medicine and Biomedicine. J. Adv. Med. Sci. Applied Technol. 2016, 2, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, S.; Saravanan, K.; Mothana, R.A.; Ramachandran, G.; Rajivgandhi, G.; Manoharan, N. Anti-Cancer Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Avicennia marina against A549 Lung Cancer Cells through ROS/Mitochondrial Damages. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 3018–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dias, M.; Zhang, R.; Lammers, T.; Pallares, R.M. Clinical Translation and Landscape of Silver Nanoparticles. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2025, 15, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mustapha, T.; Misni, N.; Ithnin, N.R.; Daskum, A.M.; Unyah, N.Z. A Review on Plants and Microorganisms Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles, Role of Plants Metabolites and Applications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sati, A.; Ranade, T.N.; Mali, S.N.; Ahmad Yasin, H.K.; Pratap, A. Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs): Comprehensive Insights into Bio/Synthesis, Key Influencing Factors, Multifaceted Applications, and Toxicity—A 2024 Update. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 7549–7582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmad, N.; Sharma, S. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Extracts of Ananas Comosus. Green Sustain. Chem. 2012, 2, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Azmi, S.N.H.; Al-Jassasi, B.M.H.; Al-Sawafi, H.M.S.; Al-Shukaili, S.H.G.; Rahman, N.; Nasir, M. Optimization for Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles through Response Surface Methodology Using Leaf Extract of Boswellia sacra and Its Application in Antimicrobial Activity. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.; Lee, S.Y.; Akter, S.; Huq, M.A. Probiotic-Mediated Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Applications against Pathogenic Strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Polymers 2022, 14, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Du, L.; Chen, J.; Xu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, J. Electrospun Composite Nanofibre Fabrics Containing Green Reduced Ag Nanoparticles as an Innovative Type of Antimicrobial Insole. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 7891–7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shahzadi, S.; Fatima, S.; Shafiq, Z.; Janjua, M.R.S.A. A Review on Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles (SNPs) Using Plant Extracts: A Multifaceted Approach in Photocatalysis, Environmental Remediation, and Biomedicine. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 3858–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zehra, S.H.; Ramzan, K.; Viskelis, J.; Viskelis, P.; Balciunaitiene, A. Advancements in Green Synthesis of Silver-Based Nanoparticles: Antimicrobial and Antifungal Properties in Various Films. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sánchez-López, E.; Gomes, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.L.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A.; et al. Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaur, A.; Preet, S.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, R. Synergetic Effect of Vancomycin Loaded Silver Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 176, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feizi, S.; Taghipour, E.; Ghadam, P.; Mohammadi, P. Antifungal, Antibacterial, Antibiofilm and Colorimetric Sensing of Toxic Metals Activities of Eco Friendly, Economical Synthesized Ag/AgCl Nanoparticles Using Malva sylvestris Leaf Extracts. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajivgandhi, G.; Maruthupandy, M.; Quero, F.; Li, W.J. Graphene/Nickel Oxide Nanocomposites against Isolated ESBL Producing Bacteria and A549 Cancer Cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dixit, D.; Gangadharan, D.; Popat, K.M.; Reddy, C.R.K.; Trivedi, M.; Gadhavi, D.K. Synthesis, Characterization and Application of Green Seaweed Mediated Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) as Antibacterial Agents for Water Disinfection. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fahim, M.; Shahzaib, A.; Nishat, N.; Jahan, A.; Bhat, T.A.; Inam, A. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Influencing Factors, and Applications. JCIS Open 2024, 16, 100125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rodrigues, A.S.; Batista, J.G.S.; Rodrigues, M.Á.V.; Thipe, V.C.; Minarini, L.A.R.; Lopes, P.S.; Lugão, A.B. Advances in Silver Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review on Their Potential as Antimicrobial Agents and Their Mechanisms of Action Elucidated by Proteomics. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1440065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singh, H.; Du, J.; Singh, P.; Yi, T.H. Extracellular Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Pseudomonas Sp. THG-LS1.4 and Their Antimicrobial Application. J. Pharm. Anal. 2018, 8, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ranjbar, S.; Bakhtiari, A.; Khosravi, N.; Jafari Ashkavandi, S.; Azamian, F.; Alijaniha, M.; Karbalaee, M. Silver Nanoparticles: Biomedical Applications and Future Perspectives. J. Compos. Compd. 2024, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nour El-Dein, M.M.; Baka, Z.A.M.; Abou-Dobara, M.I.; El-Sayed, A.K.A.; El-Zahed, M.M. Extracellular Biosynthesis, Optimization, Characterization and Antimicrobial Potential of Escherichia coli D8 Silver Nanoparticles. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2021, 10, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdelmoneim, H.M.; Taha, T.H.; Elnouby, M.S.; AbuShady, H.M. Extracellular Biosynthesis, OVAT/Statistical Optimization, and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) Using Leclercia adecarboxylata THHM and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Microb. Cell Factories 2022, 21, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mangiri, R.; Ramachandran, T.; Kumar, Y.A.; Ghosh, A.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Yadav, A.K.; Mani, D. Surface Engineering of M5X4 MXenes for Next-Gen Energy Solutions. Mater. Today Chem. 2025, 48, 102864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Velgosova, O.; Mačák, L.; Múdra, E.; Vojtko, M.; Lisnichuk, M. Preparation, Structure, and Properties of PVA–AgNPs Nanocomposites. Polymers 2023, 15, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Villarreal-Gómez, L.J.; Pérez-González, G.L.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Pestryakov, A.; Nimaev, V.; Soloveva, A.; Cornejo-Bravo, J.M.; Toledaño-Magaña, Y. Antimicrobial Effect of Electrospun Nanofibers Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles: Influence of Ag Incorporation Method. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021, 9920755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Quintero-Quiroz, C.; Botero, L.E.; Zárate-Triviño, D.; Acevedo-Yepes, N.; Escobar, J.S.; Pérez, V.Z.; Cruz Riano, L.J. Synthesis and Characterization of a Silver Nanoparticle-Containing Polymer Composite with Antimicrobial Abilities for Application in Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices. Biomater. Res. 2020, 24, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Harun-Ur-Rashid, M.; Foyez, T.; Krishna, S.B.N.; Poda, S.; Imran, A. Bin Recent Advances of Silver Nanoparticle-Based Polymer Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 8480–8505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martínez-Rodríguez, M.A.; Garza-Navarro, M.A.; Moreno-Cortez, I.E.; Lucio-Porto, R.; González-González, V.A. Silver/Polysaccharide-Based Nanofibrous Materials Synthesized from Green Chemistry Approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 136, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maliszewska, I.; Czapka, T. Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers with Antimicrobial Activity. Polymers 2022, 14, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, H.; Ni, J.; Chen, J.; Xue, W.; Wang, J.; Na, H.; Zhu, J. Activation of Corn Cellulose with Alcohols to Improve Its Dissolvability in Fabricating Ultrafine Fibers via Electrospinning. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 123, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mostafa, M.; Kandile, N.G.; Mahmoud, M.K.; Ibrahim, H.M. Synthesis and Characterization of Polystyrene with Embedded Silver Nanoparticle Nanofibers to Utilize as Antibacterial and Wound Healing Biomaterial. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. He, M.; Chen, M.; Dou, Y.; Ding, J.; Yue, H.; Yin, G.; Chen, X.; Cui, Y. Electrospun Silver Nanoparticles-Embedded Feather Keratin/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Antibacterial Composite Nanofibers. Polymers 2020, 12, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dai, Z.; Yang, H.; Yin, P.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Dou, Y.; Sun, S. Applications of Cyclodextrin-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Inflammation-Related Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Costoya, A.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Electrospun Fibers of Cyclodextrins and Poly(Cyclodextrins). Molecules 2017, 22, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Musuc, A.M. Cyclodextrins: Advances in Chemistry, Toxicology, and Multifaceted Applications. Molecules 2024, 29, 5319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gur’eva, L.L.; Kuzub, L.I.; Anokhin, D.V.; Badamshina, E.R. From Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles to Polymer Nanocomposites. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2025, 74, 281–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mikhailova, E.O. Silver Nanoparticles: Mechanism of Action and Probable Bio-Application. J. Funct. Biomater. 2020, 11, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hassan, S.M.; Morsy, J.M.; Hassanin, H.M.; Othman, E.S.; Mostafa, M.A. New Synthetic Chitosan Schiff Bases Bearing Pyranoquinolinone or Benzonaphthyridine and Their Silver Nanoparticles Derivatives with Potential Activity as Antioxidant and Molecular Docking Study for EGFR Inhibitors. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 29919–29933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Maršík, D.; Thoresen, P.P.; Maťátková, O.; Masák, J.; Sialini, P.; Rova, U.; Tsikourkitoudi, V.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L.; Jarošová Kolouchová, I. Synthesis and Characterization of Lignin-Silver Nanoparticles. Molecules 2024, 29, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Neto, F.N.S.; Morais, L.A.; Gorup, L.F.; Ribeiro, L.S.; Martins, T.J.; Hosida, T.Y.; Francatto, P.; Barbosa, D.B.; Camargo, E.R.; Delbem, A.C.B. Facile Synthesis of PVP-Coated Silver Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Their Physicochemical, Antimicrobial and Toxic Activity. Colloids Interfaces 2023, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Malik, M.A.; Batterjee, M.G.; Kamli, M.R.; Alzahrani, K.A.; Danish, E.Y.; Nabi, A. Polyphenol-Capped Biogenic Synthesis of Noble Metallic Silver Nanoparticles for Antifungal Activity against Candida auris. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Butola, B.S.; Kumar, A. Green Chemistry Based In-Situ Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Multifunctional Finishing of Chitosan Polysaccharide Modified Cellulosic Textile Substrate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rónavári, A.; Bélteky, P.; Boka, E.; Zakupszky, D.; Igaz, N.; Szerencsés, B.; Pfeiffer, I.; Kónya, Z.; Kiricsi, M. Polyvinyl-Pyrrolidone-Coated Silver Nanoparticles—The Colloidal, Chemical and Biological Consequences of Steric Stabilization under Biorelevant Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Novikov, I.V.; Pigaleva, M.A.; Levin, E.E.; Abramchuk, S.S.; Naumkin, A.V.; Li, H.; Pich, A.; Gallyamov, M.O. The Mechanism of Stabilization of Silver Nanoparticles by Chitosan in Carbonic Acid Solutions. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2020, 298, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hassan, T.; Salam, A.; Khan, A.; Khan, S.U.; Khanzada, H.; Wasim, M.; Khan, M.Q.; Kim, I.S. Functional Nanocomposites and Their Potential Applications: A Review. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Singh, N.B.; Kumar, B.; Usman, U.L.; Susan, M.A.B.H. Nano Revolution: Exploring the Frontiers of Nanomaterials in Science, Technology, and Society. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2024, 39, 101299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Priya, S.; Murali, A.; Preeth, D.R.; Dharanibalaji, K.C.; Jeyajothi, G. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticle-Embedded Poly(Methyl Methacrylate-Co-Methacrylic Acid) Copolymer for Fungal-Free Leathers. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 4607–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Paul, D.R.; Robeson, L.M. Polymer Nanotechnology: Nanocomposites. Polymer 2008, 49, 3187–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Taghavizadeh Yazdi, M.E.; Darroudi, M.; Amiri, M.S.; Zarrinfar, H.; Hosseini, H.A.; Mashreghi, M.; Mozafarri, H.; Ghorbani, A.; Mousavi, S.H. Antimycobacterial, Anticancer, Antioxidant and Photocatalytic Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Berberis Integerrima. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2022, 46, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jo, J.H.; Singh, P.; Kim, Y.J.; Wang, C.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Jin, C.G.; Yang, D.C. Pseudomonas deceptionensis DC5-Mediated Synthesis of Extracellular Silver Nanoparticles. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 1576–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bastos Araruna, F.; Oliveira Sousa Araruna, F.; Lima Alves Pereira, L.P.; Aranha Brito, M.C.; Veras Quelemes, P.; de Araújo-Nobre, A.R.; de Oliveira, T.M.; da Silva, D.A.; de Souza de Almeida Leite, J.R.; Fernandes Coutinho, D.; et al. Green Syntheses of Silver Nanoparticles Using Babassu Mesocarp Starch (Attalea speciosa Mart. Ex Spreng.) and Their Antimicrobial Applications. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 13, 100281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ibrahim, H.M.; Reda, M.M.; Klingner, A. Preparation and Characterization of Green Carboxymethylchitosan (CMCS)—Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Electrospun Nanofibers Containing Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) and Its Potential Use as Biomaterials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Thomas, R.; Soumya, K.R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Electrospun Polycaprolactone Membrane Incorporated with Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles as Effective Wound Dressing Material. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 2213–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kowsalya, E.; MosaChristas, K.; Balashanmugam, P.; Tamil Selvi, A.; Jaquline Chinna Rani, I. Biocompatible Silver Nanoparticles/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Electrospun Nanofibers for Potential Antimicrobial Food Packaging Applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 21, 100379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Premkumar, J.; Sudhakar, T.; Dhakal, A.; Shrestha, J.B.; Krishnakumar, S.; Balashanmugam, P. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) from Cinnamon against Bacterial Pathogens. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Burdușel, A.C.; Gherasim, O.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Mogoantă, L.; Ficai, A.; Andronescu, E. Biomedical Applications of Silver Nanoparticles: An up-to-Date Overview. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Baktash, E.B.; Kazemi, N.M.; Hamedi, S. Preparation of Silver-Containing Starch Nanocomposite Prepared from Green Synthesis with Green Tea Plant Extract and Investigation of Dye Degradation and Antibacterial Activity. Nanomed. Res. J. 2024, 9, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Agarwal, H.; Venkat Kumar, S.; Rajeshkumar, S. A Review on Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles—An Eco-Friendly Approach. Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2017, 3, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Duman, H.; Eker, F.; Akdaşçi, E.; Witkowska, A.M.; Bechelany, M.; Karav, S. Silver Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review of Synthesis Methods and Chemical and Physical Properties. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, Applications and Toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kirubakaran, D.; Wahid, J.B.A.; Karmegam, N.; Jeevika, R.; Sellapillai, L.; Rajkumar, M.; SenthilKumar, K.J. A Comprehensive Review on the Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Advancements in Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Biomed. Mater. Devices 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Altammar, K.A. A Review on Nanoparticles: Characteristics, Synthesis, Applications, and Challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1155622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Esmail, R.; Afshar, A.; Morteza, M.; Abolfazl, A.; Akhondi, E. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles with High Efficiency and Stability by Culture Supernatant of Bacillus ROM6 Isolated from Zarshouran Gold Mine and Evaluating Its Antibacterial Effects. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ghosh Chaudhuri, R.; Paria, S. Core/Shell Nanoparticles: Classes, Properties, Synthesis Mechanisms, Characterization, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2373–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nikzamir, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Panahi, Y. An Overview on Nanoparticles Used in Biomedicine and Their Cytotoxicity. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 61, 102316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khalil, M.A.; El-Shanshoury, A.E.-R.R.; Alghamdi, M.A.; Alsalmi, F.A.; Mohamed, S.F.; Sun, J.; Ali, S.S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Marine Actinobacterium Nocardiopsis dassonvillei and Exploring Their Therapeutic Potentials. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 705673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Singh, P.; Pandit, S.; Balusamy, S.R.; Madhusudanan, M.; Singh, H.; Amsath Haseef, H.M.; Mijakovic, I. Advanced Nanomaterials for Cancer Therapy: Gold, Silver, and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Oncological Applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2025, 14, 2403059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, M.; Peltier, R.; Zhang, M.; Lu, H.; Bian, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, Z.; Shen, Y.; Sun, H.; Wang, Z. In Situ Reduction of Silver Nanoparticles on Hybrid Polydopamine–Copper Phosphate Nanoflowers with Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 5311–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Obliosca, J.M.; Liu, C.; Yeh, H.-C. Fluorescent Silver Nanoclusters as DNA Probes. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8443–8461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, K.; Dong, B. Direct Evidence of Plasmonic Enhancement on Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol over Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Flexible Fibrous Networks. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 188, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schoen, D.T.; Schoen, A.P.; Hu, L.; Kim, H.S.; Heilshorn, S.C.; Cui, Y. High Speed Water Sterilization Using One-Dimensional Nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3628–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wei, X.; Cai, J.; Lin, S.; Li, F.; Tian, F. Controlled Release of Monodisperse Silver Nanoparticles via in Situ Cross-Linked Polyvinyl Alcohol as Benign and Antibacterial Electrospun Nanofibers. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 197, 111370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, X.; Schluesener, H.J. Nanosilver: A Nanoproduct in Medical Application. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 176, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wijnhoven, S.W.P.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Herberts, C.A.; Hagens, W.I.; Oomen, A.G.; Heugens, E.H.W.; Roszek, B.; Bisschops, J.; Gosens, I.; Van De Meent, D.; et al. Nano-Silver—A Review of Available Data and Knowledge Gaps in Human and Environmental Risk Assessment. Nanotoxicology 2009, 3, 109–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pandey, R.; Wang, N.; Sahu, B.B.; Moharana, S.; Tiwari, S.K. Metal and Materials Engineering: Historical Prospect. In Nanoparticles Reinforced Metal Nanocomposites; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  85. Nordberg, G.; Gerhardsson, L. Silver. In Handbook on Toxicity of Inorganic Compounds; Seiler, H.G., Sigel, H., Sigel, A., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 619–624. [Google Scholar]
  86. Galatage, S.T.; Hebalkar, A.S.; Gote, R.V.; Mali, O.R.; Killedar, S.G. Silver Nano Particles by Green Synthesis: An Overview. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2020, 13, 1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M.; Zoroddu, M.A. Medical Uses of Silver: History, Myths, and Scientific Evidence. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 5923–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sabarees, G.; Velmurugan, V.; Tamilarasi, G.P.; Alagarsamy, V.; Raja Solomon, V. Recent Advances in Silver Nanoparticles Containing Nanofibers for Chronic Wound Management. Polymers 2022, 14, 3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Warheit, D.B.; Borm, P.J.A.; Hennes, C.; Lademann, J. Testing Strategies to Establish the Safety of Nanomaterials: Conclusions of an ECETOC Workshop. Inhal. Toxicol. 2007, 19, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Satyavani, K.; Gurudeeban, S.; Ramanathan, T.; Balasubramanian, T. Biomedical Potential of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized from Calli Cells of Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Satyavani, K.; Gurudeeban, S.; Deepak, V.; Ramanathan, T. Heliotropium Curassavicum Mediated Silver Nanoparticles for Environmental Application. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2013, 17, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kaliamurthi, S.; Selvaraj, G.; Çakmak, Z.E.; Çakmak, T. Production and Characterization of Spherical Thermostable Silver Nanoparticles from Spirulina platensis (Cyanophyceae). Phycologia 2016, 55, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chaloupka, K.; Malam, Y.; Seifalian, A.M. Nanosilver as a New Generation of Nanoproduct in Biomedical Applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, X.F.; Liu, Z.G.; Shen, W.; Gurunathan, S. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, Applications, and Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abbas, R.; Luo, J.; Qi, X.; Naz, A.; Khan, I.A.; Liu, H.; Yu, S.; Wei, J. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Morones, J.R.; Elechiguerra, J.L.; Camacho, A.; Holt, K.; Kouri, J.B.; Ramírez, J.T.; Yacaman, M.J. The Bactericidal Effect of Silver Nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 2346–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Benelli, G. Plant-Mediated Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles as an Emerging Tool against Mosquitoes of Medical and Veterinary Importance: A Review. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Shanmuganathan, R.; Karuppusamy, I.; Saravanan, M.; Muthukumar, H.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Ramkumar, V.S.; Pugazhendhi, A. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Biomedical Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 2650–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wei, L.; Lu, J.; Xu, H.; Patel, A.; Chen, Z.S.; Chen, G. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Properties, and Therapeutic Applications. Drug Discov. Today 2015, 20, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sondi, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B. Silver Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agent: A Case Study on E. coli as a Model for Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Martínez-Castañón, G.A.; Niño-Martínez, N.; Martínez-Gutierrez, F.; Martínez-Mendoza, J.R.; Ruiz, F. Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles with Different Sizes. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2008, 10, 1343–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Guzman, M.; Dille, J.; Godet, S. Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. Nanomedicine 2012, 8, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kim, K.J.; Sung, W.S.; Suh, B.K.; Moon, S.K.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, D.G. Antifungal Activity and Mode of Action of Silver Nano-Particles on Candida albicans. BioMetals 2009, 22, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jo, Y.K.; Kim, B.H.; Jung, G. Antifungal Activity of Silver Ions and Nanoparticles on Phytopathogenic Fungi. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lara, H.H.; Garza-Treviño, E.N.; Ixtepan-Turrent, L.; Singh, D.K. Silver Nanoparticles Are Broad-Spectrum Bactericidal and Virucidal Compounds. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Manea, F.; Motoc, S.; Pop, A.; Remes, A.; Schoonman, J. Silver-Functionalized Carbon Nanofiber Composite Electrodes for Ibuprofen Detection. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rodríguez-León, E.; Iñiguez-Palomares, R.; Navarro, R.E.; Herrera-Urbina, R.; Tánori, J.; Iñiguez-Palomares, C.; Maldonado, A. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Reducing Agents Obtained from Natural Sources (Rumex hymenosepalus Extracts). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jamkhande, P.G.; Ghule, N.W.; Bamer, A.H.; Kalaskar, M.G. Metal Nanoparticles Synthesis: An Overview on Methods of Preparation, Advantages and Disadvantages, and Applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 101174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Begum, S.J.P.; Pratibha, S.; Rawat, J.M.; Venugopal, D.; Sahu, P.; Gowda, A.; Qureshi, K.A.; Jaremko, M. Recent Advances in Green Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications of Bioactive Metallic Nanoparticles. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zahin, N.; Anwar, R.; Tewari, D.; Kabir, M.T.; Sajid, A.; Mathew, B.; Uddin, M.S.; Aleya, L.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Nanoparticles and Its Biomedical Applications in Health and Diseases: Special Focus on Drug Delivery. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 19151–19168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches to the Synthesis of Monodispersed Spherical Colloids of Low Melting-Point Metals. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2047–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nyabadza, A.; McCarthy, É.; Makhesana, M.; Heidarinassab, S.; Plouze, A.; Vazquez, M.; Brabazon, D. A Review of Physical, Chemical and Biological Synthesis Methods of Bimetallic Nanoparticles and Applications in Sensing, Water Treatment, Biomedicine, Catalysis and Hydrogen Storage. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 321, 103010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Iravani, S. Green Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Daniel, M.C.; Astruc, D. Gold Nanoparticles: Assembly, Supramolecular Chemistry, Quantum-Size-Related Properties, and Applications toward Biology, Catalysis, and Nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ahmed, S.; Ahmad, M.; Swami, B.L.; Ikram, S. A Review on Plants Extract Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Applications: A Green Expertise. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kapoor, R.T.; Salvadori, M.R.; Rafatullah, M.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Khan, M.A.; Alshareef, S.A. Exploration of Microbial Factories for Synthesis of Nanoparticles—A Sustainable Approach for Bioremediation of Environmental Contaminants. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 658294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Siddiqi, K.S.; Husen, A.; Rao, R.A.K. A Review on Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Biocidal Properties. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mohammadlou, M.; Maghsoudi, H.; Jafarizadeh-Malmiri, H. A Review on Green Silver Nanoparticles Based on Plants: Synthesis, Potential Applications and Eco-Friendly Approach. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 446–463. [Google Scholar]
  119. Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Gomez, E.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Parsons, J.G.; Troiani, H.; Jose-Yacaman, M. Alfalfa Sprouts: A Natural Source for the Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2003, 19, 1357–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Velmurugan, P.; Sivakumar, S.; Young-Chae, S.; Seong-Ho, J.; Pyoung-In, Y.; Jeong-Min, S.; Sung-Chul, H. Synthesis and Characterization Comparison of Peanut Shell Extract Silver Nanoparticles with Commercial Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antifungal Activity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 31, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Banerjee, P.; Nath, D. A Phytochemical Approach to Synthesize Silver Nanoparticles for Non-Toxic Biomedical Application and Study on Their Antibacterial Efficacy. Nanosci. Technol. 2015, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ibrahim, H.M.M. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Banana Peel Extract and Their Antimicrobial Activity against Representative Microorganisms. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Roy, K.; Biswas, S.; Banerjee, P.C. “Green” Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Using Grape (Vitis vinifera) Fruit Extract: Characterization of the Particles and Study of Antibacterial Activity. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1271–1278. [Google Scholar]
  124. Kumar, B.; Smita, K.; Cumbal, L.; Debut, A. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Andean Blackberry Fruit Extract. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kumar, C.; Yugandhar, P.; Savithramma, N. Biological Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Adansonia digitata L. Fruit Pulp Extract, Characterization, and Its Antimicrobial Properties. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 5, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rad, M.S.; Sharifi, J.; Heshmati, G.A.; Miri, A.; Jyoti Sen, D. Biological Synthesis of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles by Nitraria schoberi Fruits. Am. J. Adv. Drug Deliv. 2013, 1, 174–179. [Google Scholar]
  127. Naganathan, K.; Thirunavukkarasu, S. Green Way Genesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Multiple Fruit Peels Waste and Its Antimicrobial, Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Tumor Cell Line Studies. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 191, p. 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Song, J.Y.; Kim, B.S. Rapid Biological Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Plant Leaf Extracts. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 32, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Ali, M.A.; Ahmed, T.; Wu, W.; Hossain, A.; Hafeez, R.; Islam Masum, M.M.; Wang, Y.; An, Q.; Sun, G.; Li, B. Advancements in Plant and Microbe-Based Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Antimicrobial Activity against Plant Pathogens. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Rafique, M.; Sadaf, I.; Rafique, M.S.; Tahir, M.B. A Review on Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Applications. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 1272–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Singh, P.; Kim, Y.J.; Zhang, D.; Yang, D.C. Biological Synthesis of Nanoparticles from Plants and Microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Bahrulolum, H.; Nooraei, S.; Javanshir, N.; Tarrahimofrad, H.; Mirbagheri, V.S.; Easton, A.J.; Ahmadian, G. Green Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Microorganisms and Their Application in the Agrifood Sector. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Haefeli, C.; Franklin, C.; Hardy, K. Plasmid-Determined Silver Resistance in Pseudomonas stutzeri Isolated from a Silver Mine. J. Bacteriol. 1984, 158, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Iravani, S. Bacteria in Nanoparticle Synthesis: Current Status and Future Prospects. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Klaus, T.; Joerger, R.; Olsson, E.; Granqvist, C.G. Silver-Based Crystalline Nanoparticles, Microbially Fabricated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 13611–13614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kalimuthu, K.; Suresh Babu, R.; Venkataraman, D.; Bilal, M.; Gurunathan, S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanocrystals by Bacillus licheniformis. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2008, 65, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Annamalai, J.; Nallamuthu, T. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: Characterization and Determination of Antibacterial Potency. Appl. Nanosci. 2016, 6, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Saravanan, M.; Vemu, A.K.; Barik, S.K. Rapid Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Bacillus Megaterium (NCIM 2326) and Their Antibacterial Activity on Multi Drug Resistant Clinical Pathogens. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 88, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Arif, R.; Uddin, R. A Review on Recent Developments in the Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Biomedical Applications. Med. Devices Sens. 2021, 4, e10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shahverdi, A.R.; Minaeian, S.; Shahverdi, H.R.; Jamalifar, H.; Nohi, A.A. Rapid Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Culture Supernatants of Enterobacteria: A Novel Biological Approach. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 919–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lagopati, N.; Gatou, M.A.; Tsoukleris, D.S.; Pavlatou, E.A. Biogenic Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles with Antimicrobial Properties. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2020, 5, 000185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gade, A.K.; Bonde, P.; Ingle, A.P.; Marcato, P.D.; Durán, N.; Rai, M.K. Exploitation of Aspergillus niger for Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2008, 2, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ingle, A.; Rai, M.; Gade, A.; Bawaskar, M. Fusarium Solani: A Novel Biological Agent for the Extracellular Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2009, 11, 2079–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kathiresan, K.; Manivannan, S.; Nabeel, M.A.; Dhivya, B. Studies on Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Marine Fungus, Penicillium fellutanum Isolated from Coastal Mangrove Sediment. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 71, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jain, N.; Bhargava, A.; Majumdar, S.; Tarafdar, J.C.; Panwar, J. Extracellular Biosynthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aspergillus flavus NJP08: A Mechanism Perspective. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ma, L.; Su, W.; Liu, J.X.; Zeng, X.X.; Huang, Z.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.C.; Tang, J.X. Optimization for Extracellular Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Penicillium aculeatum Su1 and Their Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxic Effect Compared with Silver Ions. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 77, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lotfy, W.A.; Alkersh, B.M.; Sabry, S.A.; Ghozlan, H.A. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Aspergillus terreus: Characterization, Optimization, and Biological Activities. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 633468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Agarwal, P.; Gupta, R.; Agarwal, N. Advances in Synthesis and Applications of Microalgal Nanoparticles for Wastewater Treatment. J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 2019, 7392713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Teixeira, L.M.; Reis, C.P.; Pacheco, R. Marine-Derived Compounds Combined with Nanoparticles: A Focus on the Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sector. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Xie, J.; Lee, J.Y.; Wang, D.I.C.; Ting, Y.P. Silver Nanoplates: From Biological to Biomimetic Synthesis. ACS Nano 2007, 1, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Merin, D.D.; Prakash, S.; Bhimba, B.V. Antibacterial Screening of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Marine Micro Algae. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2010, 3, 797–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Prasad, T.N.; Kambala, V.S.R.; Naidu, R. Phyconanotechnology: Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Brown Marine Algae Cystophora moniliformis and Their Characterisation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. El-Sheekh, M.M.; El-Kassas, H.Y. Algal Production of Nano-Silver and Gold: Their Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities: A Review. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2016, 14, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wei, G.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z.; Song, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, L.; Li, Z. One-Step Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles, Nanorods, and Nanowires on the Surface of DNA Network. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8738–8743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nithyaja, B.; Misha, H.; Nampoori, V.P.N. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles in DNA Template and Its Influence on Nonlinear Optical Properties. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 2, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Almatroudi, A. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterisation and Biomedical Applications. Open Life Sci. 2020, 15, 819–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kasyanenko, N.; Varshavskii, M.; Ikonnikov, E.; Tolstyko, E.; Belykh, R.; Sokolov, P.; Bakulev, V.; Rolich, V.; Lopatko, K. DNA Modified with Metal Nanoparticles: Preparation and Characterization of Ordered Metal-DNA Nanostructures in a Solution and on a Substrate. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Dai, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, T.; Du, Z.; Dang, H. Preparation of Silver Nanopatterns on DNA Templates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 249, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  159. Kulkarni, D.; Sherkar, R.; Shirsathe, C.; Sonwane, R.; Varpe, N.; Shelke, S.; More, M.P.; Pardeshi, S.R.; Dhaneshwar, G.; Junnuthula, V.; et al. Biofabrication of Nanoparticles: Sources, Synthesis, and Biomedical Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1159193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Huang, W.; Yan, M.; Duan, H.; Bi, Y.; Cheng, X.; Yu, H. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles and Epoxiconazole against Setosphaeria turcica. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Taleb Safa, M.A.; Koohestani, H. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles with Green Tea Extract from Silver Recycling of Radiographic Films. Results Eng. 2024, 21, 101808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Elshafie, H.S.; Pohl, P. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) by Lallemantia royleana Leaf Extract: Their Bio-Pharmaceutical and Catalytic Properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 448, 115318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Baran, M.F.; Keskin, C.; Baran, A.; Hatipoğlu, A.; Yildiztekin, M.; Küçükaydin, S.; Kurt, K.; Hoşgören, H.; Sarker, M.M.R.; Sufianov, A.; et al. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Allium cepa L. Peel Extract, Their Antioxidant, Antipathogenic, and Anticholinesterase Activity. Molecules 2023, 28, 2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Sarkar, S.; Kotteeswaran, V. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Aqueous Leaf Extract of Pomegranate (Punica granatum) and Their Anticancer Activity on Human Cervical Cancer Cells. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 025014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tongwanichniyom, S.; Phewrat, N.; Rangsarikorn, N.; Leasen, S.; Luangkamin, S.; Chumnanvej, N. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Mature-Pseudostem Extracts of Alpinia nigra and Their Bioactivities. Green Process. Synth. 2024, 13, 20230226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Behravan, M.; Hossein Panahi, A.; Naghizadeh, A.; Ziaee, M.; Mahdavi, R.; Mirzapour, A. Facile Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Berberis vulgaris Leaf and Root Aqueous Extract and Its Antibacterial Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chakraborty, A.; Haque, S.M.; Ghosh, D.; Dey, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Maity, D.K.; Ghosh, B. Silver Nanoparticle Synthesis and Their Potency against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Green Approach from Tissue-Cultured Coleus forskohlii. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Saravanan, M.; Barik, S.K.; MubarakAli, D.; Prakash, P.; Pugazhendhi, A. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Bacillus brsevis (NCIM 2533) and Their Antibacterial Activity against Pathogenic Bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ajaz, S.; Ahmed, T.; Shahid, M.; Noman, M.; Shah, A.A.; Mehmood, M.A.; Abbas, A.; Cheema, A.I.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Li, B. Bioinspired Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Using a Native Bacillus Sp. Strain AW1-2: Characterization and Antifungal Activity against Colletotrichum falcatum Went. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2021, 144, 109745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Huq, M.A. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Pseudoduganella eburnea MAHUQ-39 and Their Antimicrobial Mechanisms Investigation against Drug Resistant Human Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Akther, T.; Khan, M.S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles via Fungal Cell Filtrate and Their Anti-Quorum Sensing against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Feroze, N.; Arshad, B.; Younas, M.; Afridi, M.I.; Saqib, S.; Ayaz, A. Fungal Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mukherjee, P.; Roy, M.; Mandal, B.P.; Dey, G.K.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Ghatak, J.; Tyagi, A.K.; Kale, S.P. Green Synthesis of Highly Stabilized Nanocrystalline Silver Particles by a Non-Pathogenic and Agriculturally Important Fungus T. asperellum. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 075103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xue, B.; He, D.; Gao, S.; Wang, D.; Yokoyama, K.; Wang, L. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by the Fungus Arthroderma Fulvum and Its Antifungal Activity against Genera of Candida, Aspergillus and Fusarium. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 1899–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sharma, A.; Sagar, A.; Rana, J.; Rani, R. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Antibacterial Activity Using Fungus Talaromyces purpureogenus Isolated from Taxus baccata Linn. Micro Nano Syst. Lett. 2022, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Fatima, R.; Priya, M.; Indurthi, L.; Radhakrishnan, V.; Sudhakaran, R. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Red Algae Portieria hornemannii and Its Antibacterial Activity against Fish Pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 138, 103780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Do, J.-M.; Hong, J.W.; Yoon, H.-S. Microalgae-Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Sustainable Approach Using Extracellular Polymeric Substances from Graesiella emersonii KNUA204. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1589285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Ramkumar, V.S.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Sivagurunathan, P.; Saratale, G.D.; Dung, T.N.B.; Kannapiran, E. Biofabrication and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Extract of Seaweed Enteromorpha compressa and Its Biomedical Properties. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Jha, A.K.; Prasad, K.; Prasad, K.; Kulkarni, A.R. Plant System: Nature’s Nanofactory. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 73, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Nguyen, N.P.U.; Dang, N.T.; Doan, L.; Nguyen, T.T.H. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: From Conventional to ‘Modern’ Methods—A Review. Processes 2023, 11, 2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Srikar, S.K.; Giri, D.D.; Pal, D.B.; Mishra, P.K.; Upadhyay, S.N. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Review. Green Sustain. Chem. 2016, 6, 34–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kora, A.J.; Sashidhar, R.B.; Arunachalam, J. Gum Kondagogu (Cochlospermum gossypium): A Template for the Green Synthesis and Stabilization of Silver Nanoparticles with Antibacterial Application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 670–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Salem, S.S.; Fouda, A. Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Prospective Biotechnological Applications: An Overview. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 344–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Seifipour, R.; Nozari, M.; Pishkar, L. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Tragopogon collinus Leaf Extract and Study of Their Antibacterial Effects. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 2926–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Theivasanthi, T.; Alagar, M. Anti-Bacterial Studies of Silver Nanoparticles. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1101.0348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Mikhailova, E.O. Green Silver Nanoparticles: An Antibacterial Mechanism. Antibiotics 2024, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Roopan, S.M.; Rohit; Madhumitha, G.; Rahuman, A.A.; Kamaraj, C.; Bharathi, A.; Surendra, T.V. Low-Cost and Eco-Friendly Phyto-Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Cocos Nucifera Coir Extract and Its Larvicidal Activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Sadeghi, B.; Gholamhoseinpoor, F. A Study on the Stability and Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ziziphora tenuior (Zt) Extract at Room Temperature. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 134, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M.; Pourmortazavi, S.M.; Shandiz, S.A.S.; Ahmadi, F.; Batooli, H. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Eucalyptus leucoxylon Leaves Extract and Evaluating the Antioxidant Activities of Extract. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 1964–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Sana, S.S.; Dogiparthi, L.K. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Givotia moluccana Leaf Extract and Evaluation of Their Antimicrobial Activity. Mater. Lett. 2018, 226, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Edison, T.J.I.; Sethuraman, M.G. Instant Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Terminalia chebula Fruit Extract and Evaluation of Their Catalytic Activity on Reduction of Methylene Blue. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Khalil, M.M.H.; Ismail, E.H.; El-Baghdady, K.Z.; Mohamed, D. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Olive Leaf Extract and Its Antibacterial Activity. Arab. J. Chem. 2014, 7, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Das, S.K.; Khan, M.M.R.; Guha, A.K.; Das, A.R.; Mandal, A.B. Silver-Nano Biohybride Material: Synthesis, Characterization and Application in Water Purification. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 124, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Ashraf, S.; Abbasi, A.Z.; Pfeiffer, C.; Hussain, S.Z.; Khalid, Z.M.; Gil, P.R.; Parak, W.J.; Hussain, I. Protein-Mediated Synthesis, PH-Induced Reversible Agglomeration, Toxicity and Cellular Interaction of Silver Nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 102, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Moldovan, B.; Sincari, V.; Perde-Schrepler, M.; David, L. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ligustrum ovalifolium Fruits and Their Cytotoxic Effects. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Ortega-Arroyo, L.; Martin-Martinez, E.S.; Aguilar-Mendez, M.A.; Cruz-Orea, A.; Hernandez-Pérez, I.; Glorieux, C. Green Synthesis Method of Silver Nanoparticles Using Starch as Capping Agent Applied the Methodology of Surface Response. Starch-Stärke 2013, 65, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Sathishkumar, G.; Gobinath, C.; Karpagam, K.; Hemamalini, V.; Premkumar, K.; Sivaramakrishnan, S. Phyto-Synthesis of Silver Nanoscale Particles Using Morinda citrifolia L. and Its Inhibitory Activity against Human Pathogens. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 95, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Bala, A.; Rani, G. A Review on Phytosynthesis, Affecting Factors and Characterization Techniques of Silver Nanoparticles Designed by Green Approach. Int. Nano Lett. 2020, 10, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Verma, A.; Mehata, M.S. Controllable Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Neem Leaves and Their Antimicrobial Activity. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2016, 9, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ahmed, R.H.; Mustafa, D.E. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Mediated by Traditionally Used Medicinal Plants in Sudan. Int. Nano Lett. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. El-Rafie, M.H.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Ramadan, M.A.; Fouda, M.M.G.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Hebeish, A. Environmental Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Hydroxypropyl Starch and Their Characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Mohammed Fayaz, A.; Balaji, K.; Kalaichelvan, P.T.; Venkatesan, R. Fungal Based Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles-An Effect of Temperature on the Size of Particles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Fernando, K.M.; Gunathilake, C.A.; Yalegama, C.; Samarakoon, U.K.; Fernando, C.A.N.; Weerasinghe, G.; Pamunuwa, G.K.; Soliman, I.; Ghulamullah, N.; Rajapaksha, S.M.; et al. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Green Reducing Agent: Ceylon Olive (Elaeocarpus serratus): Characterization and Investigating Their Antimicrobial Properties. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Senthil, B.; Devasena, T.; Prakash, B.; Rajasekar, A. Non-Cytotoxic Effect of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles and Its Antibacterial Activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017, 177, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Arya, G.; Kumari, R.M.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, A.; Chandra, R.; Nimesh, S. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Prosopis juliflora Bark Extract: Reaction Optimization, Antimicrobial and Catalytic Activities. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Jasrotia, T.; Chaudhary, S.; Kaushik, A.; Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, G.R. Green Chemistry-Assisted Synthesis of Biocompatible Ag, Cu, and Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 15, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Verma, D.K.; Hasan, S.H.; Banik, R.M. Photo-Catalyzed and Phyto-Mediated Rapid Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Herbal Extract of Salvinia molesta and Its Antimicrobial Efficacy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2016, 155, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Katta, V.K.M.; Dubey, R.S. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Tagetes Erecta Plant and Investigation of Their Structural, Optical, Chemical and Morphological Properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 45, 794–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Roy, K.; Sarkar, C.K.; Ghosh, C.K. Plant-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Parsley (Petroselinum crispum) Leaf Extract: Spectral Analysis of the Particles and Antibacterial Study. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 5, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Naganthran, A.; Verasoundarapandian, G.; Khalid, F.E.; Masarudin, M.J.; Zulkharnain, A.; Nawawi, N.M.; Karim, M.; Che Abdullah, C.A.; Ahmad, S.A. Synthesis, Characterization and Biomedical Application of Silver Nanoparticles. Materials 2022, 15, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Ibrahim, N.H.; Taha, G.M.; Hagaggi, N.S.A.; Moghazy, M.A. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Environmental Sensor Ability to Some Heavy Metals. BMC Chem. 2024, 18, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Fares, A.; Mahdy, A.; Ahmed, G. Unraveling the Mysteries of Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial Effects and Uptake Translocation in Plant—A Review. Planta 2024, 260, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Sastry, M.; Mayya, K.S.; Bandyopadhyay, K. PH Dependent Changes in the Optical Properties of Carboxylic Acid Derivatized Silver Colloidal Particles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1997, 127, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Sastry, M.; Patil, V.; Sainkar, S.R. Electrostatically Controlled Diffusion of Carboxylic Acid Derivatized Silver Colloidal Particles in Thermally Evaporated Fatty Amine Films. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 1404–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Mittal, A.K.; Chisti, Y.; Banerjee, U.C. Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles Using Plant Extracts. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Lin, P.-C.; Lin, S.; Wang, P.C.; Sridhar, R. Techniques for Physicochemical Characterization of Nanomaterials. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Rauwel, P.; Küünal, S.; Ferdov, S.; Rauwel, E. A Review on the Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Morphologies Studied via TEM. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2015, 682749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Hall, J.B.; Dobrovolskaia, M.A.; Patri, A.K.; McNeil, S.E. Characterization of Nanoparticles for Therapeutics. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Fissan, H.; Ristig, S.; Kaminski, H.; Asbach, C.; Epple, M. Comparison of Different Characterization Methods for Nanoparticle Dispersions before and after Aerosolization. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 7324–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Akintelu, S.A.; Bo, Y.; Folorunso, A.S. A Review on Synthesis, Optimization, Mechanism, Characterization, and Antibacterial Application of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized from Plants. J. Chem. 2020, 2020, 3189043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Mourdikoudis, S.; Pallares, R.M.; Thanh, N.T.K. Characterization Techniques for Nanoparticles: Comparison and Complementarity upon Studying Nanoparticle Properties. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 12871–12934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Pasieczna-Patkowska, S.; Cichy, M.; Flieger, J. Application of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy in Characterization of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles. Molecules 2025, 30, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Shameli, K.; Ahmad, M.; Shabanzadeh, P.; Zamanian, A.; Sangpour, P.; Abdollahi, Y.; Mohsen, Z. Green Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Curcuma longa Tuber Powder. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5603–5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Okka, E.Z.; Tongur, T.; Aytas, T.T.; Yılmaz, M.; Topel, Ö.; Sahin, R. Green Synthesis and the Formation Kinetics of Silver Nanoparticles in Aqueous Inula viscosa Extract. Optik 2023, 294, 171487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Serrano-Díaz, P.; Williams, D.W.; Vega-Arreguin, J.; Manisekaran, R.; Twigg, J.; Morse, D.; García-Contreras, R.; Arenas-Arrocena, M.C.; Acosta-Torres, L.S. Geranium Leaf-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Transcriptomic Effects on Candida albicans. Green Process. Synth. 2023, 12, 20228105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Gharari, Z.; Hanachi, P.; Sadeghinia, H.; Walker, T.R. Eco-Friendly Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles by Scutellaria Multicaulis Leaf Extract and Its Biological Activities. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Abd-Elhady, H.M.; Ashor, M.A.; Hazem, A.; Saleh, F.M.; Selim, S.; El Nahhas, N.; Abdel-Hafez, S.H.; Sayed, S.; Hassan, E.A. Biosynthesis and Characterization of Extracellular Silver Nanoparticles from Streptomyces aizuneusis: Antimicrobial, Anti Larval, and Anticancer Activities. Molecules 2021, 27, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Răut, I.; Constantin, M.; Șuică-Bunghez, R.; Firincă, C.; Alexandrescu, E.; Gîfu, I.C.; Doni, M.; Zamfir, L.-G.; Gurban, A.-M.; Jecu, L. Extracellular Biosynthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Filamentous fungi. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Bhatnagar, S.; Kobori, T.; Ganesh, D.; Ogawa, K.; Aoyagi, H. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Mediated by Extracellular Pigment from Talaromyces purpurogenus and Their Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Restrepo, C.V.; Villa, C.C. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles, Influence of Capping Agents, and Dependence on Size and Shape: A Review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 15, 100428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Clogston, J.D.; Patri, A.K. Zeta Potential Measurement. In Characterization of Nanoparticles Intended for Drug Delivery; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Danaei, M.; Dehghankhold, M.; Ataei, S.; Hasanzadeh Davarani, F.; Javanmard, R.; Dokhani, A.; Khorasani, S.; Mozafari, M.R. Impact of Particle Size and Polydispersity Index on the Clinical Applications of Lipidic Nanocarrier Systems. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Velgosova, O.; Mačák, L.; Mára, V.; Múdra, E.; Vojtko, M.; Lisnichuk, M.; Čižmárová, E. The Influence of Reagents on the Shape, Stability, and Toxicity of AgNPs and Their Use to Produce Polymer-AgNPs Composites. Metals 2023, 13, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Mulfinger, L.; Solomon, S.D.; Bahadory, M.; Jeyarajasingam, A.V.; Rutkowsky, S.A.; Boritz, C. Synthesis and Study of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Shehzad, A.; Tariq, F.; Al Saidi, A.K.; Khan, K.A.; Khan, S.A.; Alshammari, F.H.; Ul-Islam, M. Green-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticle-Infused PVA Hydrogels: A Sustainable Solution for Skin Repair. Results Chem. 2025, 17, 102584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Choi, O.; Deng, K.K.; Kim, N.-J.; Ross, L.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Hu, Z. The Inhibitory Effects of Silver Nanoparticles, Silver Ions, and Silver Chloride Colloids on Microbial Growth. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3066–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Natsuki, J.; Natsuki, T.; Hashimoto, Y. A Review of Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis Methods, Properties and Applications. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Rupanshi; Kumar, V.; Yadav, N.; Singh, D.; Beniwal, V.; Chhabra, J.; Singh, B. Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles as Next-Generation Green Catalysts for Multifaceted Applications. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 2025, 31, 145–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Gerardo, C.; Cretu, E.; Rohling, R. Fabrication of Circuits on Flexible Substrates Using Conductive SU-8 for Sensing Applications. Sensors 2017, 17, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Yeo, C.I.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, J.B.; Lee, J.C.; Lee, Y.T. Spin-Coated Ag Nanoparticles for Enhancing Light Absorption of Thin Film a-Si:H Solar Cells. Opt. Mater. Express 2014, 4, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Bindumadhavan, K.; Chang, P.-Y.; Doong, R. Silver Nanoparticles Embedded Boron-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide as Anode Material for High Performance Lithium Ion Battery. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 243, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Fei Guo, C.; Sun, T.; Cao, F.; Liu, Q.; Ren, Z. Metallic Nanostructures for Light Trapping in Energy-Harvesting Devices. Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Jo, Y.K.; Seo, J.H.; Choi, B.H.; Kim, B.J.; Shin, H.H.; Hwang, B.H.; Cha, H.J. Surface-Independent Antibacterial Coating Using Silver Nanoparticle-Generating Engineered Mussel Glue. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 20242–20253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Ghaedi, M.; Yousefinejad, M.; Safarpoor, M.; Khafri, H.Z.; Purkait, M.K. Rosmarinus Officinalis Leaf Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Investigation of Its Antimicrobial Properties. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 31, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Ahmadi, F.; Lackner, M. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Cannabis Sativa: Properties, Synthesis, Mechanistic Aspects, and Applications. ChemEngineering 2024, 8, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Ershov, V.A.; Ershov, B.G. Effect of Silver Nanoparticle Size on Antibacterial Activity. Toxics 2024, 12, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Yin, I.X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, I.S.; Mei, M.L.; Li, Q.; Chu, C.H. The Antibacterial Mechanism of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Application in Dentistry. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Gahlawat, G.; Choudhury, A.R. A Review on the Biosynthesis of Metal and Metal Salt Nanoparticles by Microbes. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 12944–12967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Qing, Y.; Cheng, L.; Li, R.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Qin, Y. Potential Antibacterial Mechanism of Silver Nanoparticles and the Optimization of Orthopedic Implants by Advanced Modification Technologies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 3311–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Nqoro, X.; Taziwa, R. Polymer-Based Functional Materials Loaded with Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Potential Scaffolds for the Management of Infected Wounds. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Gomaa, E.Z. Silver Nanoparticles as an Antimicrobial Agent: A Case Study on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli as Models for Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 63, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Ninganagouda, S.; Rathod, V.; Singh, D.; Hiremath, J.; Singh, A.K.; Mathew, J.; Ul-Haq, M. Growth Kinetics and Mechanistic Action of Reactive Oxygen Species Released by Silver Nanoparticles from Aspergillus niger on Escherichia coli. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 753419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Buszewski, B.; Railean-Plugaru, V.; Pomastowski, P.; Rafińska, K.; Szultka-Mlynska, M.; Golinska, P.; Wypij, M.; Laskowski, D.; Dahm, H. Antimicrobial Activity of Biosilver Nanoparticles Produced by a Novel Streptacidiphilus durhamensis Strain. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2018, 51, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Gahlawat, G.; Shikha, S.; Chaddha, B.S.; Chaudhuri, S.R.; Mayilraj, S.; Choudhury, A.R. Microbial Glycolipoprotein-Capped Silver Nanoparticles as Emerging Antibacterial Agents against Cholera. Microb. Cell Factories 2016, 15, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Soenen, S.J.; Rivera-Gil, P.; Montenegro, J.M.; Parak, W.J.; De Smedt, S.C.; Braeckmans, K. Cellular Toxicity of Inorganic Nanoparticles: Common Aspects and Guidelines for Improved Nanotoxicity Evaluation. Nano Today 2011, 6, 446–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Chandimali, N.; Bak, S.G.; Park, E.H.; Lim, H.-J.; Won, Y.-S.; Kim, E.-K.; Park, S.-I.; Lee, S.J. Free Radicals and Their Impact on Health and Antioxidant Defenses: A Review. Cell Death Discov. 2025, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Hassabo, A.G.; Nada, A.A.; Ibrahim, H.M.; Abou-Zeid, N.Y. Impregnation of Silver Nanoparticles into Polysaccharide Substrates and Their Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 122, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Dakal, T.C.; Kumar, A.; Majumdar, R.S.; Yadav, V. Mechanistic Basis of Antimicrobial Actions of Silver Nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. González-Fernández, S.; Blanco-Agudín, N.; Rodríguez, D.; Fernández-Vega, I.; Merayo-Lloves, J.; Quirós, L.M. Silver Nanoparticles: A Versatile Tool Against Infectious and Non-Infectious Diseases. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Rahman, S.; Rahman, L.; Khalil, A.T.; Ali, N.; Zia, D.; Ali, M.; Shinwari, Z.K. Endophyte-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Biological Applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 2551–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Nurani, S.J.; Saha, C.K.; Rahman Khan, M.A.; Sunny, S.M.H. Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis, Properties, Applications and Future Perspectives: A Short Review. IOSR J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2015, 10, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Yousef, N.; Temerk, H. Enhancement the Antibacterial Potential of the Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Hydrophilic Polymers. Microbiol. Res. J. Int. 2017, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Zook, J.M.; Halter, M.D.; Cleveland, D.; Long, S.E. Disentangling the Effects of Polymer Coatings on Silver Nanoparticle Agglomeration, Dissolution, and Toxicity to Determine Mechanisms of Nanotoxicity. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2012, 14, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Pereira, D.; Ferreira, S.; Ramírez-Rodríguez, G.B.; Alves, N.; Sousa, Â.; Valente, J.F.A. Silver and Antimicrobial Polymer Nanocomplexes to Enhance Biocidal Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Bhong, M.; Khan, T.K.H.; Devade, K.; Vijay Krishna, B.; Sura, S.; Eftikhaar, H.K.; Pal Thethi, H.; Gupta, N. Review of Composite Materials and Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 93, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Sharma, A.K.; Priya; Kaith, B.S. Polymer Nanocomposite Matrices: Classification, Synthesis Methods, and Applications; Hussain, C.M., Thomas, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; ISBN 978-3-030-40512-0. [Google Scholar]
  267. Vedarethinam, V.; Arun, C. Nanocomposites and Nanofillers. In Handbook of Nanofillers; Mallakpour, S., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2024; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  268. Schadler, L.S. Polymer-Based and Polymer-Filled Nanocomposites. In Nanocomposite Science and Technology; Ajayan, P.M., Schadler, L.S., Braun, P.V., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; pp. 77–154. ISBN 3527303596. [Google Scholar]
  269. Musa, A.A.; Bello, A.; Adams, S.M.; Onwualu, A.P.; Anye, V.C.; Bello, K.A.; Obianyo, I.I. Nano-Enhanced Polymer Composite Materials: A Review of Current Advancements and Challenges. Polymers 2025, 17, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Saha, R.; Munshi, M.H.; Akter, M.; Shikder, A.A.R.; Islam, T. Synthesis Techniques, Fundamental Properties, and Emerging Applications of Nanocomposites: A Comprehensive Review. SPE Polym. 2025, 6, e70004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Nichols, S.P.; Koh, A.; Storm, W.L.; Shin, J.H.; Schoenfisch, M.H. Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2528–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Khdary, N.H.; Almuarqab, B.T.; El Enany, G. Nanoparticle-Embedded Polymers and Their Applications: A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Kharazmi, A.; Saion, E.; Faraji, N.; Soltani, N.; Dehzangi, A. Optical Properties of CdS/PVA Nanocomposite Films Synthesized Using the Gamma-Irradiation-Induced Method. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2013, 30, 057803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Yang, Q.; Li, D.; Hong, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Qiu, S.; Wei, Y. Preparation and Characterization of a PAN Nanofibre Containing Ag Nanoparticles via Electrospinning. In Proceedings of the Synthetic Metals, Shanghai, China, 4 April 2003; Volume 137, pp. 973–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Shalumon, K.T.; Anulekha, K.H.; Nair, S.V.; Nair, S.V.; Chennazhi, K.P.; Jayakumar, R. Sodium Alginate/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Nano ZnO Composite Nanofibers for Antibacterial Wound Dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Dai, J.; Bruening, M.L. Catalytic Nanoparticles Formed by Reduction of Metal Ions in Multilayered Polyelectrolyte Films. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Li, Z.; Huang, H.; Shang, T.; Yang, F.; Zheng, W.; Wang, C.; Manohar, S.K. Facile Synthesis of Single-Crystal and Controllable Sized Silver Nanoparticles on the Surfaces of Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibres. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 917–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Bottino, A.; Capannelli, G.; Comite, A. Preparation and Characterization of Novel Porous PVDF-ZrO2 Composite Membranes. Desalination 2002, 146, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Bottino, A.; Capannelli, G.; D’Asti, V.; Piaggio, P. Preparation and Properties of Novel Organic-Inorganic Porous Membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22–23, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Haider, A.; Kang, I.K. Preparation of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Industrial and Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2015, 165257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Radha, K.V.; Selvi, V.S.; Aarcha, J. Silver Nanofiber Membranes for Indoor Air Pollution Treatment. Sustain. Chem. Clim. Action 2025, 6, 100056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Dallas, P.; Tucek, J.; Jancik, D.; Kolar, M.; Panacek, A.; Zboril, R. Magnetically Controllable Silver Nanocomposite with Multifunctional Phosphotriazine Matrix and High Antimicrobial Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2347–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Tunç, T. Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Loaded with Carboplatin as a Potential Antimicrobial and Cancer Therapy. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Gan, Y.X. Nanofibers and Their Composites: Fabrication, Characterization, and Structure with Particular Emphasis on Their Advantages and Disadvantages. In Polymeric Nanofibers and Their Composites: Recent Advances and Applications; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 1–30. ISBN 9780443141287. [Google Scholar]
  285. Frenot, A.; Chronakis, I.S. Polymer Nanofibers Assembled by Electrospinning. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 8, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Wang, H.; Tian, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Z. Advancements, Functionalization Techniques, and Multifunctional Applications in Biomedical and Industrial Fields of Electrospun Pectin Nanofibers: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 307, 141964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Phan, D.-N.; Dorjjugder, N.; Saito, Y.; Taguchi, G.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, I.-S. The Mechanistic Actions of Different Silver Species at the Surfaces of Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers Regarding Antibacterial Activities. Mater. Today Commun. 2019, 21, 100622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Xu, X.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Jing, X. Biodegradable Electrospun Poly(l-Lactide) Fibers Containing Antibacterial Silver Nanoparticles. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 2081–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Fan, L.; Dong, Y.; Ismail, B.B.; Zhang, L.; Shi, Y.; Wu, D.; Wu, Y.; Li, G. The Antimicrobial Activity and Resistance Evolution of Nanomaterials: A Review. ACS Mater. Lett. 2025, 7, 1085–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Burger, C.; Hsiao, B.S.; Chu, B. Nanofibrous Materials and Their Applications. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2006, 36, 333–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Huang, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. A Review on Polymer Nanofibers by Electrospinning and Their Applications in Nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 2223–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Kriegel, C.; Arrechi, A.; Kit, K.; McClements, D.J.; Weiss, J. Fabrication, Functionalization, and Application of Electrospun Biopolymer Nanofibers. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 48, 775–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Gavande, V.; Nagappan, S.; Seo, B.; Lee, W.-K. A Systematic Review on Green and Natural Polymeric Nanofibers for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 262, 130135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Farboudi, A.; Mahboobnia, K.; Chogan, F.; Karimi, M.; Askari, A.; Banihashem, S.; Davaran, S.; Irani, M. UiO-66 Metal Organic Framework Nanoparticles Loaded Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Poly Ethylene Oxide/Polyurethane Core-Shell Nanofibers for Controlled Release of Doxorubicin and Folic Acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Cordoba, A.; Saldias, C.; Urzúa, M.; Montalti, M.; Guernelli, M.; Focarete, M.L.; Leiva, A. On the Versatile Role of Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers as Photocatalytic Hybrid Materials Applied to Contaminated Water Remediation: A Brief Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Elsayed, R.; Teow, Y.H. Advanced Functional Polymer Materials for Biomedical Applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2025, 142, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Aktürk, A.; Cenik, B.; Aydoğdu, Z.; Taygun, M.E.; Güler, F.K.; Küçükbayrak, S. Fabrication and Characterization of Polyvinyl Alcohol/Gelatin/ Silver Nanoparticle Nanocomposite Materials. Eurasian J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2019, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  298. Raei, M.; Shabani, M.; Parivar, K.; Najafi, M.; Adabi, M. Development, Characterization and Bioactivity of PVA/VPA/Aloin Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications. Nanomed. Res. J. 2024, 9, 356–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Fu, S.; Sun, Z.; Huang, P.; Li, Y.; Hu, N. Some Basic Aspects of Polymer Nanocomposites: A Critical Review. Nano Mater. Sci. 2019, 1, 2–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Kaur, S.; Sundarrajan, S.; Rana, D.; Sridhar, R.; Gopal, R.; Matsuura, T.; Ramakrishna, S. Review: The Characterization of Electrospun Nanofibrous Liquid Filtration Membranes. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 6143–6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Opriș, O.; Mormile, C.; Lung, I.; Stegarescu, A.; Soran, M.-L.; Soran, A. An Overview of Biopolymers for Drug Delivery Applications. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Hong, K.H.; Park, J.L.; Hwan Sul, I.N.; Youk, J.H.; Kang, T.J. Preparation of Antimicrobial Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Nanofibers Containing Silver Nanoparticles. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2006, 44, 2468–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Mansur, H.S.; Mansur, A.A.P. CdSe Quantum Dots Stabilized by Carboxylic-Functionalized PVA: Synthesis and UV–Vis Spectroscopy Characterization. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 125, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Fathollahipour, S.; Abouei Mehrizi, A.; Ghaee, A.; Koosha, M. Electrospinning of PVA/Chitosan Nanocomposite Nanofibers Containing Gelatin Nanoparticles as a Dual Drug Delivery System. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 3852–3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Yang, C.; Wu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, L.; Wei, S. Nanofibrous Scaffold Prepared by Electrospinning of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Gelatin Aqueous Solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 121, 3047–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Lin, W.-C.; Yu, D.-G.; Yang, M.-C. Blood Compatibility of Novel Poly(γ-Glutamic Acid)/Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogels. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2006, 47, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Krevelen, D.W. Some Basic Aspects of Flame Resistance of Polymeric Materials. Polymer 1975, 16, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Türkoğlu, G.C.; Khomarloo, N.; Mohsenzadeh, E.; Gospodinova, D.N.; Neznakomova, M.; Salaün, F. PVA-Based Electrospun Materials—A Promising Route to Designing Nanofiber Mats with Desired Morphological Shape—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Khanna, P.K.; Singh, N.; Charan, S.; Subbarao, V.V.V.S.; Gokhale, R.; Mulik, U.P. Synthesis and Characterization of Ag/PVA Nanocomposite by Chemical Reduction Method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 93, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Kharazmi, A.; Faraji, N.; Mat Hussin, R.; Saion, E.; Yunus, W.M.M.; Behzad, K. Structural, Optical, Opto-Thermal and Thermal Properties of ZnS–PVA Nanofluids Synthesized through a Radiolytic Approach. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Balakrishnan, S.B.; Thambusamy, S. Preparation of Silver Nanoparticles and Riboflavin Embedded Electrospun Polymer Nanofibrous Scaffolds for in Vivo Wound Dressing Application. Process Biochem. 2020, 88, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Zhang, C.Q.; Wang, Y.M.; Li, S.Z.; Feng, X.D.; Liu, L.H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.P. Electrospinning and Catalytic Properties of Cyclodextrin Functionalized Polyoxymethylene (POM) Nanofibers Supported by Silver Nanoparticles. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2021, 2021, 8272626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Andrade, P.F.; de Faria, A.F.; da Silva, D.S.; Bonacin, J.A.; do Carmo Gonçalves, M. Structural and Morphological Investigations of β-Cyclodextrin-Coated Silver Nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 118, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Teaima, M.H.; Abdelnaby, F.A.; Fadel, M.; El-Nabarawi, M.A.; Shoueir, K.R. Synthesis of Biocompatible and Environmentally Nanofibrous Mats Loaded with Moxifloxacin as a Model Drug for Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Bouzitoun, M.; Mlika, R.; Gam, H.; Ouada, H.B.; Majdoub, M.; Sfihi, H. A Non-Water-Soluble Modified β-Cyclodextrin for Sensitive Electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2006, 26, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Tingry, S.; Innocent, C.; Touil, S.; Deratani, A.; Seta, P. Carbon Paste Biosensor for Phenol Detection of Impregnated Tissue: Modification of Selectivity by Using β-Cyclodextrin-Containing PVA Membrane. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2006, 26, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Li, R.; Dou, J.; Jiang, Q.; Li, J.; Xie, Z.; Liang, J.; Ren, X. Preparation and Antimicrobial Activity of β-Cyclodextrin Derivative Copolymers/Cellulose Acetate Nanofibers. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 248, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Anceschi, A.; Caldera, F.; Bertasa, M.; Cecone, C.; Trotta, F.; Bracco, P.; Zanetti, M.; Malandrino, M.; Mallon, P.E.; Scalarone, D. New Poly(β-Cyclodextrin)/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Electrospun Sub-Micrometric Fibers and Their Potential Application for Wastewater Treatments. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Morin-Crini, N.; Crini, G. Environmental Applications of Water-Insoluble β-Cyclodextrin–Epichlorohydrin Polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 344–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Dos Santos, J.P.; da Rosa Zavareze, E.; Dias, A.R.G.; Vanier, N.L. Immobilization of Xylanase and Xylanase–β-Cyclodextrin Complex in Polyvinyl Alcohol via Electrospinning Improves Enzyme Activity at a Wide PH and Temperature Range. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 1676–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Celebioglu, A.; Aytac, Z.; Umu, O.C.O.; Dana, A.; Tekinay, T.; Uyar, T. One-Step Synthesis of Size-Tunable Ag Nanoparticles Incorporated in Electrospun PVA/Cyclodextrin Nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Norouzi, Z.; Abdouss, M. Preparation and Characterization of β-Cyclodextrin Grafted Chitosan Nanofibers via Electrospinning for Dye Removal. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 3641–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Kianfar, P.; Vitale, A.; Dalle Vacche, S.; Bongiovanni, R. Enhancing Properties and Water Resistance of PEO-Based Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes by Photo-Crosslinking. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 1879–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Subramanian, A.; Vu, D.; Larsen, G.F.; Lin, H.-Y. Preparation and Evaluation of the Electrospun Chitosan/PEO Fibers for Potential Applications in Cartilage Tissue Engineering. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2005, 16, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. Schneider, H.E.; Steuber, J.; Du, W.; Mortazavi, M.; Bullock, D. Polyethylene Oxide Nanofiber Production by Electrospinning. J. Ark. Acad. Sci. 2016, 70, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Xu, F.; Gough, I.; Dorogin, J.; Sheardown, H.; Hoare, T. Nanostructured Degradable Macroporous Hydrogel Scaffolds with Controllable Internal Morphologies via Reactive Electrospinning. Acta Biomater. 2020, 104, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Rajam, S.; Ho, C.C. Graft Coupling of PEO to Mixed Cellulose Esters Microfiltration Membranes by UV Irradiation. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Aqil, A.; Vasseur, S.; Duguet, E.; Passirani, C.; Benoît, J.P.; Roch, A.; Müller, R.; Jérôme, R.; Jérôme, C. PEO Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for Biomedical Application. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 3191–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Liu, S.L.; Shao, L.; Chua, M.L.; Lau, C.H.; Wang, H.; Quan, S. Recent Progress in the Design of Advanced PEO-Containing Membranes for CO2 Removal. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1089–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Deng, F.; Wang, X.; He, D.; Hu, J.; Gong, C.; Ye, Y.S.; Xie, X.; Xue, Z. Microporous Polymer Electrolyte Based on PVDF/PEO Star Polymer Blends for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 491, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Li, D.; Xia, Y. Direct Fabrication of Composite and Ceramic Hollow Nanofibers by Electrospinning. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Filip, P.; Peer, P. Characterization of Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers—Mutual Relations between Mean Diameter of Electrospun Nanofibers and Solution Characteristics. Processes 2019, 7, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Zhang, M.; Song, W.; Tang, Y.; Xu, X.; Huang, Y.; Yu, D. Polymer-Based Nanofiber–Nanoparticle Hybrids and Their Medical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Liang, D.; Hsiao, B.S.; Chu, B. Functional Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 1392–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Matsumura, S.; Shimura, Y.; Terayama, K.; Kiyohara, T. Effects of Molecular Weight and Stereoregularity on Biodegradation of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) by Alcaligenes Faecalis. Biotechnol. Lett. 1994, 16, 1205–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Mori, T.; Sakimoto, M.; Kagi, T.; Sakai, T. Isolation and Characterization of a Strain of Bacillus Megaterium That Degrades Poly(Vinyl Alcohol). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Zgoła-Grześkowiak, A.; Grześkowiak, T.; Zembrzuska, J.; Łukaszewski, Z. Comparison of Biodegradation of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)s and Poly(Propylene Glycol)s. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Hassounah, I.; Shehata, N.; Hudson, A.; Orler, B.; Meehan, K. Characteristics and 3D Formation of PVA and PEO Electrospun Nanofibers with Embedded Urea. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 39840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Rickel, A.P.; Deng, X.; Engebretson, D.; Hong, Z. Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffold for Vascular Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 129, 112373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  340. Zhu, H.; Du, M.; Zou, M.; Xu, C.; Li, N.; Fu, Y. Facile and Green Synthesis of Well-Dispersed Au Nanoparticles in PAN Nanofibers by Tea Polyphenols. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 9301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Fernandes, M.; Padrão, J.; Ribeiro, A.I.; Fernandes, R.D.V.; Melro, L.; Nicolau, T.; Mehravani, B.; Alves, C.; Rodrigues, R.; Zille, A. Polysaccharides and Metal Nanoparticles for Functional Textiles: A Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Chen, S.; Xie, Y.; Ma, K.; Wei, Z.; Ran, X.; Fu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, C. Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes Meet Antibacterial Nanomaterials: From Preparation Strategies to Biomedical Applications. Bioact. Mater. 2024, 42, 478–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Sunaryono, S.; Rachmawati, A.; Yogihati, C.I.; Susanto, H.; Taufiq, A.; Mufti, N. The Effect of Ag Nanoparticles in Ag/Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofiber Composites. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Fouda, M.M.G.; El-Aassar, M.R.; Al-Deyab, S.S. Antimicrobial Activity of Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Polyethylene Oxide Nanofibers Embedded Silver Nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Nguyen, T.-H.; Lee, K.-H.; Lee, B.-T. Fabrication of Ag Nanoparticles Dispersed in PVA Nanowire Mats by Microwave Irradiation and Electro-Spinning. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2010, 30, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Xiao, S.; Xu, W.; Ma, H.; Fang, X. Size-Tunable Ag Nanoparticles Immobilized in Electrospun Nanofibers: Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. George, N.; Chakraborty, S.; Mary, N.L.; Suguna, L. Incorporating Silver Nanoparticles into Electrospun Nanofibers of Casein/Polyvinyl Alcohol to Develop Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 267, 131501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Celebioglu, A.; Topuz, F.; Yildiz, Z.I.; Uyar, T. One-Step Green Synthesis of Antibacterial Silver Nanoparticles Embedded in Electrospun Cyclodextrin Nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Meng, Y. A Sustainable Approach to Fabricating Ag Nanoparticles/PVA Hybrid Nanofiber and Its Catalytic Activity. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 1124–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Hong, K.H. Preparation and Properties of Electrospun Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Silver Fiber Web as Wound Dressings. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Li, C.; Fu, R.; Yu, C.; Li, Z.; Guan, H.; Hu, D.; Zhao, D.; Lu, L. Silver Nanoparticle/Chitosan Oligosaccharide/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Nanofibers as Wound Dressings: A Preclinical Study. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 4131–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Hamza, A.M.; Alhtheal, E.D.; Shakir, A.K. Enhancement the Efficiency of ZnOnanofiber Mats Antibacterial Using Novel PVA/Ag Nanoparticles. Energy Procedia 2017, 119, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Abdulhussain, R.; Adebisi, A.; Conway, B.R.; Asare-Addo, K. Electrospun Nanofibers: Exploring Process Parameters, Polymer Selection, and Recent Applications in Pharmaceuticals and Drug Delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 90, 105156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Lee, S.J.; Heo, D.N.; Moon, J.-H.; Ko, W.-K.; Lee, J.B.; Bae, M.S.; Park, S.W.; Kim, J.E.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, E.-C.; et al. Electrospun Chitosan Nanofibers with Controlled Levels of Silver Nanoparticles. Preparation, Characterization and Antibacterial Activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Eatemadi, A.; Daraee, H.; Zarghami, N.; Melat Yar, H.; Akbarzadeh, A. Nanofiber: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  356. Nemati, S.; Kim, S.; Shin, Y.M.; Shin, H. Current Progress in Application of Polymeric Nanofibers to Tissue Engineering. Nano Converg. 2019, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Cho, Y.; Beak, J.W.; Sagong, M.; Ahn, S.; Nam, J.S.; Kim, I. Electrospinning and Nanofiber Technology: Fundamentals, Innovations, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2500162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  358. Ibrahim, H.M.; Klingner, A. A Review on Electrospun Polymeric Nanofibers: Production Parameters and Potential Applications. Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Tao, G.; Cai, R.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, H.; He, H. Fabrication of Antibacterial Sericin Based Hydrogel as an Injectable and Mouldable Wound Dressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 119, 111597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Li, H.M.; Zhang, Q.G.; Guo, N.N.; Zhu, A.M.; Liu, Q.L. Ultrafine Polystyrene Nanofibers and Its Application in Nanofibrous Membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Uyar, T.; Besenbacher, F. Electrospinning of Uniform Polystyrene Fibers: The Effect of Solvent Conductivity. Polymer 2008, 49, 5336–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Huan, S.; Liu, G.; Han, G.; Cheng, W.; Fu, Z.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Q. Effect of Experimental Parameters on Morphological, Mechanical and Hydrophobic Properties of Electrospun Polystyrene Fibers. Materials 2015, 8, 2718–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Abrigo, M.; Kingshott, P.; McArthur, S.L. Electrospun Polystyrene Fiber Diameter Influencing Bacterial Attachment, Proliferation, and Growth. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7644–7652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  364. Eda, G.; Shivkumar, S. Bead Structure Variations during Electrospinning of Polystyrene. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 5704–5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Wannatong, L.; Sirivat, A.; Supaphol, P. Effects of Solvents on Electrospun Polymeric Fibers: Preliminary Study on Polystyrene. Polym. Int. 2004, 53, 1851–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Ibrahim, H.M.; Zairy, E. Carboxymethylchitosan Nanofibers Containing Silver Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization and Antibacterial Activity. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 6, 043–048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  367. Chowdhury, M.F.M.; Khan, M.N.; Rahman, M.M. Metal Nanoparticles Incorporated Chitosan-Based Electrospun Nanofibre Mats for Wound Dressing Applications: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 137352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Stevenson, C.L.; Santini, J.T.; Langer, R. Reservoir-Based Drug Delivery Systems Utilizing Microtechnology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 1590–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Prasher, P.; Singh, M.; Mudila, H. Silver Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Therapeutics: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges. Biotech 2018, 8, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Rai, M.K.; Deshmukh, S.D.; Ingle, A.P.; Gade, A.K. Silver Nanoparticles: The Powerful Nanoweapon against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Wang, L.S.; Wang, C.Y.; Yang, C.H.; Hsieh, C.L.; Chen, S.Y.; Shen, C.Y.; Wang, J.J.; Huang, K.S. Synthesis and Anti-Fungal Effect of Silver Nanoparticles–Chitosan Composite Particles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 2685–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Yaqoob, A.A.; Ahmad, H.; Parveen, T.; Ahmad, A.; Oves, M.; Ismail, I.M.; Qari, H.A.; Umar, K.; Mohamad Ibrahim, M.N. Recent Advances in Metal Decorated Nanomaterials and Their Various Biological Applications: A Review. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Mavani, K.; Shah, M. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Using Sodium Borohydride as a Reducing Agent. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2013, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  374. Oliveira, M.M.; Ugarte, D.; Zanchet, D.; Zarbin, A.J.G. Influence of Synthetic Parameters on the Size, Structure, and Stability of Dodecanethiol-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 292, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Durán, N.; Durán, M.; De Jesus, M.B.; Seabra, A.B.; Fávaro, W.J.; Nakazato, G. Silver Nanoparticles: A New View on Mechanistic Aspects on Antimicrobial Activity. Nanomedicine 2016, 12, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Zawadzka, K.; Kądzioła, K.; Felczak, A.; Wrońska, N.; Piwoński, I.; Kisielewska, A.; Lisowska, K. Surface Area or Diameter—Which Factor Really Determines the Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Grown on TiO2 Coatings? New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 3275–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Shi, Q.; Vitchuli, N.; Nowak, J.; Noar, J.; Caldwell, J.M.; Breidt, F.; Bourham, M.; McCord, M.; Zhang, X. One-Step Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticle-Filled Nylon 6 Nanofibers and Their Antibacterial Properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 10330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Rzayev, Z.M.O.; Erdönmez, D.; Erkan, K.; Şimşek, M.; Bunyatova, U. Functional Copolymer/Organo-MMT Nanoarchitectures. XXII. Fabrication and Characterization of Antifungal and Antibacterial Poly (Vinyl Alcohol-Co-Vinyl Acetate/ODA-MMT/AgNPs Nanofibers and Nanocoatings by e-Spinning and c-Spinning Methods. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2015, 64, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Sotiriou, G.A.; Pratsinis, S.E. Antibacterial Activity of Nanosilver Ions and Particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 5649–5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Bondarenko, O.; Ivask, A.; Käkinen, A.; Kurvet, I.; Kahru, A. Particle-Cell Contact Enhances Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Godakhindi, V.; Kravitz, E.; Vivero-Escoto, J.L. Light-Activable Silver Nanoparticles for Combatting Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Biofilms. Molecules 2025, 30, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. More, P.R.; Pandit, S.; De Filippis, A.; Franci, G.; Mijakovic, I.; Galdiero, M. Silver Nanoparticles: Bactericidal and Mechanistic Approach against Drug Resistant Pathogens. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Alcolea-Rodriguez, V.; Dumit, V.I.; Ledwith, R.; Portela, R.; Bañares, M.A.; Haase, A. Differentially Induced Autophagy by Engineered Nanomaterial Treatment Has an Impact on Cellular Homeostasis and Cytotoxicity. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 11793–11799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  384. Zhao, L.; Ling, L.; Lu, J.; Jiang, F.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, X.; et al. Reactive oxygen species-responsive mitochondria-targeted liposomal quercetin attenuates retinal ischemia–reperfusion injury via regulating SIRT1/FOXO3A and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 8, e10460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  385. Yang, T.; Paulose, T.; Redan, B.W.; Mabon, J.C.; Duncan, T.V. Food and Beverage Ingredients Induce the Formation of Silver Nanoparticles in Products Stored within Nanotechnology-Enabled Packaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1398–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Han, J.; Kiss, L.; Mei, H.; Remete, A.M.; Ponikvar-Svet, M.; Sedgwick, D.M.; Roman, R.; Fustero, S.; Moriwaki, H.; Soloshonok, V.A. Chemical Aspects of Human and Environmental Overload with Fluorine. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 4678–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Jayakumar, R.; Prabaharan, M.; Sudheesh Kumar, P.T.; Nair, S.V.; Tamura, H. Biomaterials Based on Chitin and Chitosan in Wound Dressing Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 322–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Le Ouay, B.; Stellacci, F. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles: A Surface Science Insight. Nano Today 2015, 10, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Liang, D.; Lu, Z.; Yang, H.; Gao, J.; Chen, R. Novel Asymmetric Wettable AgNPs/Chitosan Wound Dressing: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 3958–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  390. Kharaghani, D.; Kee Jo, Y.; Khan, M.Q.; Jeong, Y.; Cha, H.J.; Kim, I.S. Electrospun Antibacterial Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Membranes Functionalized with Silver Nanoparticles by a Facile Wetting Method. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 108, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  391. Lv, H.; Cui, S.; Yang, Q.; Song, X.; Wang, D.; Hu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y. AgNPs-Incorporated Nanofiber Mats: Relationship between AgNPs Size/Content, Silver Release, Cytotoxicity, and Antibacterial Activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 118, 111331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  392. Abdelgawad, A.M.; Hudson, S.M.; Rojas, O.J. Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Nanofiber Mats from Multicomponent (Chitosan/Silver-NPs/Polyvinyl Alcohol) Systems. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 100, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Anisha, B.S.; Biswas, R.; Chennazhi, K.P.; Jayakumar, R. Chitosan–Hyaluronic Acid/Nano Silver Composite Sponges for Drug Resistant Bacteria Infected Diabetic Wounds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  394. Huang, S.; Zhou, L.; Li, M.-C.; Wu, Q.; Kojima, Y.; Zhou, D. Preparation and Properties of Electrospun Poly (Vinyl Pyrrolidone)/Cellulose Nanocrystal/Silver Nanoparticle Composite Fibers. Materials 2016, 9, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  395. Chaudhary, A.; Gupta, A.; Mathur, R.B.; Dhakate, S.R. Effective Antimicrobial Filter from Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile-Silver Composite Nanofibers Membrane for Conductive Environments. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2014, 5, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Castro-Mayorga, J.; Fabra, M.; Cabedo, L.; Lagaron, J. On the Use of the Electrospinning Coating Technique to Produce Antimicrobial Polyhydroxyalkanoate Materials Containing In Situ-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2016, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  397. Kumarasinghe, K.G.U.R.; Silva, W.C.H.; Fernando, M.D.A.; Palliyaguru, L.; Jayawardena, P.S.; Shimomura, M.; Fernando, S.S.N.; Gunasekara, T.D.C.P.; Jayaweera, P.M. One-Pot Reducing Agent-Free Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles/Nitrocellulose Composite Surface Coating with Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6666642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  398. Guo, L.; Yuan, W.; Lu, Z.; Li, C.M. Polymer/Nanosilver Composite Coatings for Antibacterial Applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 439, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  399. Kumar, A.; Vemula, P.K.; Ajayan, P.M.; John, G. Silver-Nanoparticle-Embedded Antimicrobial Paints Based on Vegetable Oil. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  400. Garipov, I.T.; Khaydarov, R.R.; Gapurova, O.U.; Khaydarov, R.A.; Lutfi, F.M.; Efimova, I.L.; Evgrafova, S.Y. Silver Nanoparticles as a New Generation of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Biol. 2019, 12, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  401. Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Povey, M.; York, D. Investigation into the Antibacterial Behaviour of Suspensions of ZnO Nanoparticles (ZnO Nanofluids). J. Nanoparticle Res. 2007, 9, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  402. Moustafa, M.; Alamri, S.; Elnouby, M.; Taha, T.; Abu-Saied, M.A.; Shati, A.; Al-Kahtani, M.; Alrumman, S. Hydrothermal Preparation of TiO2-Ag Nanoparticles and Its Antimicrobial Performance against Human Pathogenic Microbial Cells in Water. Biocell 2018, 42, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  403. Lee, D.; Cohen, R.E.; Rubner, M.F. Antibacterial Properties of Ag Nanoparticle Loaded Multilayers and Formation of Magnetically Directed Antibacterial Microparticles. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9651–9659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  404. Gong, P.; Li, H.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Hu, J.; Tan, W.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X. Preparation and Antibacterial Activity of Fe3O4 @Ag Nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 285604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  405. Jain, P.; Pradeep, T. Potential of Silver Nanoparticle-Coated Polyurethane Foam as an Antibacterial Water Filter. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  406. Bu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, W. Dramatically Enhanced Photocatalytic Properties of Ag-Modified Graphene–ZnO Quasi-Shell–Core Heterojunction Composite Material. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 24118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  407. Salehi-Khojin, A.; Jhong, H.M.; Rosen, B.A.; Zhu, W.; Ma, S.; Kenis, P.J.A.; Masel, R.I. Nanoparticle Silver Catalysts That Show Enhanced Activity for Carbon Dioxide Electrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1627–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  408. Zhai, H.J.; Sun, D.W.; Wang, H.S. Catalytic Properties of Silica/Silver Nanocomposites. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6, 1968–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  409. Huang, C.-J.; Shieu, F.-S.; Hsieh, W.-P.; Chang, T.-C. Acidic Hydrolysis of a Poly(Vinyl Acetate) Matrix by the Catalytic Effect of Ag Nanoparticles and the Micellization of Ag-Metal-Containing Polymer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 1457–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An overview of top-down and bottom-up methods of nanoparticle synthesis. Adopted from [108].
Figure 1. An overview of top-down and bottom-up methods of nanoparticle synthesis. Adopted from [108].
Polymers 17 02327 g001
Figure 2. Various approaches to the synthesis of AgNPs. Adopted from [2].
Figure 2. Various approaches to the synthesis of AgNPs. Adopted from [2].
Polymers 17 02327 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation illustrating the reduction of Ag+ ions to stable Ag0 nanoparticles by different biomolecules.
Figure 3. Schematic representation illustrating the reduction of Ag+ ions to stable Ag0 nanoparticles by different biomolecules.
Polymers 17 02327 g003
Figure 4. Applications of silver nanoparticles in different aspects. Adopted from [238].
Figure 4. Applications of silver nanoparticles in different aspects. Adopted from [238].
Polymers 17 02327 g004
Figure 5. The antibacterial actions of AgNPs. (1) Disruption of cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane: silver ions (Ag+) released by AgNPs adhere to or pass through cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane. (2) Denaturation of ribosomes: silver ions denature ribosomes and inhibit protein synthesis. (3) Interruption of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production: ATP production is terminated because silver ions deactivate respiratory enzyme on cytoplasmic membrane. (4) Membrane disruption by reactive oxygen species: reactive oxygen species produced by the broken electron transport chain can cause membrane disruption. (5) Interference of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication: silver and reactive oxygen species bind to DNA and prevent its replication and cell multiplication. (6) Denaturation of membrane: AgNPs accumulate in the pits of cell wall and cause membrane denaturation. (7) Perforation of membrane: AgNPs directly move across cytoplasmic membrane, which can release organelles from cell. Adopted from [247].
Figure 5. The antibacterial actions of AgNPs. (1) Disruption of cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane: silver ions (Ag+) released by AgNPs adhere to or pass through cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane. (2) Denaturation of ribosomes: silver ions denature ribosomes and inhibit protein synthesis. (3) Interruption of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production: ATP production is terminated because silver ions deactivate respiratory enzyme on cytoplasmic membrane. (4) Membrane disruption by reactive oxygen species: reactive oxygen species produced by the broken electron transport chain can cause membrane disruption. (5) Interference of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication: silver and reactive oxygen species bind to DNA and prevent its replication and cell multiplication. (6) Denaturation of membrane: AgNPs accumulate in the pits of cell wall and cause membrane denaturation. (7) Perforation of membrane: AgNPs directly move across cytoplasmic membrane, which can release organelles from cell. Adopted from [247].
Polymers 17 02327 g005
Figure 6. Differences in the in situ and ex situ preparation methods of AgNPs in addition to the difference in their aggregation.
Figure 6. Differences in the in situ and ex situ preparation methods of AgNPs in addition to the difference in their aggregation.
Polymers 17 02327 g006
Figure 7. Scheme of the electrospinning setup and process. Adopted from [295].
Figure 7. Scheme of the electrospinning setup and process. Adopted from [295].
Polymers 17 02327 g007
Table 1. Summary of some recent studies on the green synthesis of AgNPs along with its quantification techniques and applications.
Table 1. Summary of some recent studies on the green synthesis of AgNPs along with its quantification techniques and applications.
Green SourceScientific
Names
Size (nm)ShapeWavelength
(nm)
Zeta Potential
(mV)
ApplicationsReference
plantLigustrum lucidum13Spherical, triangular, polygonal, irregular438-A novel fungistat not only for comprehensive control of plant fungi[160]
planttea20–50spherical405–415−24.6Antibacterial activity[161]
plantLallemantia royleana (Benth. in Wall.)34.47 ± 1.6spherical425−24.1Biopharmaceuticals and catalytic applications[162]
plantAllium cepa19.47 ± 1.12spherical439−13.1Biomedical activities and also has other possible industrial applications[163]
plantJuglans
regia
80-90spherical420−67.2Photocatalytic
degradation of
effluent dye
[164]
plantAlpinia nigra49.36Spherical400–500-Antimicrobial
activity
[165]
plantBerberis vulgaris30–70Spherical45084.85Antibacterial
activity
[166]
plantColeus forskohlii10–50Trigonal, hexagonal, spherical, rod420-Antimicrobial
activity
[167]
BacteriaLeclercia acarboxylata17.43spherical423-Antimicrobial activity[31]
BacteriaBacillus brevis41–68Spherical420-Antibacterial
activity
[168]
BacteriaBacillus sp. 22–41Spherical447-Antifungal
activity
[169]
BacteriaPseudoduganella
eburnean
8–24Spherical448-Antimicrobial
activity
[170]
FungusSetosphaeria
rostrata
2–20Spherical400-Antibacterial activity[171]
FungusPenicillium
oxalicum
60–80Spherical600-Antibacterial activity[172]
FungusTrichoderma asperellum15.5 ± 2.5Spherical410-Antifungal activity[173]
FungusArthroderma fulvum15.5 ± 2.5Spherical420-Antifungal activity[174]
FungusTalaromyces purpureogenus30–60Spherical380–470−19.6Antibacterial and antioxidant activities[175]
AlgaePortieria hornemannii35–50Spherical418−44.5Skyscraping activity against fish pathogens[176]
AlgaeGraesiella emersonii4–35.02Spherical400–415±20–30Antibacterial activity[177]
AlgaeEnteromorpha compressa4–24Spherical421-Biomedical and pharmaceutical applications.[178]
Table 2. Key techniques for the characterization of AgNPs.
Table 2. Key techniques for the characterization of AgNPs.
TechniqueAcronymInformation ProvidedPrinciple
UV–Visible SpectroscopyUV-VisConfirms the formation of AgNPs and provides preliminary data on size and stability.Measures the absorption of light. AgNPs exhibit a unique SPR peak, typically between 400–450 nm.
Transmission Electron MicroscopyTEMDetermines particle size, size distribution, and morphology (shape).An electron beam is transmitted through an ultra-thin sample, creating a high-resolution 2D projection image of the nanoparticles.
Scanning Electron MicroscopySEMVisualizes the surface morphology of AgNPs, especially when deposited on a substrate or embedded in nanofibers.Scans the sample surface with a focused electron beam to produce images of the surface topography and composition.
Dynamic Light ScatteringDLSMeasures the hydrodynamic diameter (size in solution) and size distribution.Analyzes the fluctuations in scattered light intensity caused by the Brownian motion of particles in a suspension.
Zeta Potential Analysis Determines the surface charge and predicts the colloidal stability of the AgNPs suspension.Measures the electrophoretic mobility of particles in an electric field. High absolute values (>±30 mV) indicate good stability.
X-ray DiffractionXRDIdentifies the crystalline structure and phase purity of the AgNPs.Measures the scattering of X-rays as they pass through a sample, producing a diffraction pattern characteristic of the material’s crystal lattice.
Fourier-Transform Infrared SpectroscopyFTIRIdentifies the functional groups of capping agents on the nanoparticle surface.Measures the absorption of infrared radiation by the sample, revealing the vibrational modes of chemical bonds present.
Energy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyEDS/EDXConfirms the elemental composition and purity of the sample.Analyzes the X-rays emitted from a sample bombarded by an electron beam to identify the elements present. Often coupled with SEM or TEM.
Table 3. Comparing some characteristic parameters of different methods used for the green production of silver nanoparticles.
Table 3. Comparing some characteristic parameters of different methods used for the green production of silver nanoparticles.
Synthesis MethodParticle SizePolydispersity/PDIZeta Potential (mV)Scalability ChallengesReference
Aqueous rhizome extractTEM: ~5–40 nm (average < 20 nm)NRNRReproducibility and standardization of extract concentration; lack of absolute yield metrics—both limit direct scale-up planning[223]
Aqueous leaf extractTEM/XRD: ~15 ± 5 nmDescribed as monodispersedNRGood size control in lab but process depends strongly on extract composition and kinetics (batch-to-batch variability); scale-up needs extract standardization and control of mixing/heat transfer.[224]
Aqueous Geranium (Pelargonium) leaf extractTEM/SEM: ~30–44 nmnarrow size distribution−20 to −30 mVControlling extract phytochemical content at large scale is a major challenge.[225]
Aqueous leaf extractDLS/FESEM: ~28–32 nmNR−41.4 mVScaling requires consistent extract composition and filtration[226]
Culture filtrateDLS: 11–42 nmDescribed as high dispersity−26 ± 0.2 mVVariability in microbial metabolite composition; absence of quantitative yield measurement; controlling consistency at scale[227]
Extracellular secretions from fungi (Cladosporium, Penicillium, Purpureocillium)TEM: mostly < 20 nm;
DLS: Cladosporium/Purpureocillium ~166 nm; Penicillium ~124 nm
PDI: Cladosporium 0.074; Purpureocillium 0.279Cladosporium −15.7 mV; Penicillium −17.8 mV; Purpureocillium −13.0 mVScaling extracellular fungal systems requires consistent enzyme/metabolite production; larger hydrodynamic sizes might affect functionality and processing[228]
Fungal extractDLS Z-average: 240.2 nmPDI: 0.720 (high; polydisperse)−19.5 mVVery large, polydisperse particles with borderline zeta (moderate stability); significant challenges for reproducibility and downstream uniformity[175]
Extracellular pigment from fungusNRNot detailed−24.8 ± 7.2 mVDownstream drying adds step; pigment variability; moderate zeta suggests reasonable stability but consistency still a hurdle[229]
Legend: PDI = polydispersity index (hydrodynamic), NR = not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelmoneim, H.M.; Taha, T.H.; Alhudhaibi, A.M.; Afifi, F.M.; Faqihi, A.A.; Alsalamah, S.A.; Bendif, H. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Polymeric Nanofiber Composites: Fabrications, Mechanisms, and Applications. Polymers 2025, 17, 2327. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172327

AMA Style

Abdelmoneim HM, Taha TH, Alhudhaibi AM, Afifi FM, Faqihi AA, Alsalamah SA, Bendif H. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Polymeric Nanofiber Composites: Fabrications, Mechanisms, and Applications. Polymers. 2025; 17(17):2327. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172327

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelmoneim, Hany M., Tarek H. Taha, Abdulrahman Mohammed Alhudhaibi, Feras M. Afifi, Abdullah A. Faqihi, Sulaiman A. Alsalamah, and Hamdi Bendif. 2025. "Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Polymeric Nanofiber Composites: Fabrications, Mechanisms, and Applications" Polymers 17, no. 17: 2327. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172327

APA Style

Abdelmoneim, H. M., Taha, T. H., Alhudhaibi, A. M., Afifi, F. M., Faqihi, A. A., Alsalamah, S. A., & Bendif, H. (2025). Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Polymeric Nanofiber Composites: Fabrications, Mechanisms, and Applications. Polymers, 17(17), 2327. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17172327

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop