Next Article in Journal
Efficient Preparation of Poly(allyl diglycol carbonate) (PADC) Nuclear Track Detectors: UV Photopolymerization
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Environment-Friendly Polyurethanes from Polyols Recovered from the Recycling and Renewable Resources: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Vancomycin Loaded on Functionalized Polyketones

1
Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Via Torino5 155, 30172 Venice, Italy
2
Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, Italy
3
Crossing S.r.l., Viale della Repubblica 193/b, 31100 Treviso, Italy
4
Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Reattività Chimiche e la Catalisi (CIRCC), Via C. Ulpiani 27, 701268 Bari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(13), 1890; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131890
Submission received: 17 June 2024 / Revised: 27 June 2024 / Accepted: 1 July 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Smart and Functional Polymers)

Abstract

:
Today, polymeric drug delivery systems (DDS) appear as an interesting solution against bacterial resistance, having great advantages such as low toxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. In this work, two polyketones (PK) have been post-functionalized with sodium taurinate (PKT) or potassium sulfanilate (PKSK) and employed as carriers for Vancomycin against bacterial infections. Modified PKs were easily prepared by the Paal–Knorr reaction and loaded with Vancomycin at a variable pH. All polymers were characterized by FT-IR, DSC, TGA, SEM, and elemental analysis. Antimicrobial activity was tested against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and correlated to the different pHs used for its loading (between 2.3 and 8.8). In particular, the minimum inhibitory concentrations achieved with PKT and PKSK loaded with Vancomycin were similar, at 0.23 μg/mL and 0.24 μg/mL, respectively, i.e., six times lower than that with Vancomycin alone. The use of post-functionalized aliphatic polyketones has thus been demonstrated to be a promising way to obtain very efficient polymeric DDS.

1. Introduction

Today, the fight against infectious diseases still poses a serious challenge worldwide for healthcare. According to the literature, bacteria are becoming quickly resistant to commercially available antibiotics and antiseptics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Antibiotics are often used in massive doses to maintain their therapeutic effects because of their low bioavailability and unfavorable interactions with biological barriers, promoting bacterial resistance. Moreover, resistant bacteria develop different mechanisms, such as efflux pumps [8,9,10], the inactivation of enzyme expression [10,11,12], and the modification of drug penetration through barriers [10,13], further reducing the antibiotic efficiency. Additionally, bacteria may promote biofilm formation, which is a protective self-produced extracellular polymeric matrix, contributing to their difficult eradication [14,15,16]. Therefore, the in-depth comprehension of the resistance mechanisms and the development of alternative antimicrobials are necessary to address the problem of bacterial resistance [1,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Drug delivery systems (DDS) are widely used to prevent antibiotic and antiseptic resistance, improving drugs’ efficiency, selectivity, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics and preventing biofilm formation [6,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Biocompatible materials, such as polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and peptides, are widely used to produce DDS, avoiding drug degradation and adverse effects and controlling drug release [6,33,34,35,36,37,38].
Specifically devised polymers are also a promising alternative for biomedical and biotechnological applications, synthesized with different functional groups and promoting interactions with drugs [34,35,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. DDS-based materials can be used as carriers of therapeutic molecules (nanoparticles, microparticles, implants) or as conjugates, bonding drug molecules through linkers designed to release them specifically at targeted sites [10,34,39,47,48,49,50,51]. To date, DDS prepared with biocompatible polymers have been widely described in the literature and many are also commercially available [52,53,54].
Within this area, aliphatic PK appear as an interesting yet rarely explored solution as polymeric carriers for DDS production [55,56]. In fact, aliphatic PK, produced by the catalytic copolymerization of CO and ethylene, may be easily post-functionalized by means of the so-called Paal–Knorr reaction [57], allowing one to obtain customized PK with specific desired functional groups [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Different examples have been reported of the direct condensation of 2-sulfanylethanol, hydroxylamine or furfural with ethylene and CO. Furthermore, in some cases, post-functionalized PK were shown to have high potential as supports for different types of enzymes [72], as germicide polymeric coatings [73], or as scaffolds for urothelial cells [56].
Vancomycin (VCM), a branched tricyclic glycosylated peptide antibiotic (Figure 1), is a very interesting last-line-of-defense antibiotic used against serious infections caused by Staphylococci, Enterococci, and other Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83], inhibiting cell wall synthesis in sensitive bacteria. Because of its wide use, to limit the rise of bacterial resistance to VCM, the development of DDS is fundamental.
Physical–chemical studies have demonstrated that VCM encapsulated in polymeric PK formulations is able to penetrate the bacterial phospholipidic double membrane by releasing the drug locally, inhibiting biofilm formation and eradicating mature biofilms [14,38,85,86,87,88,89,90]. In this context, the aim of this work is to prepare polymeric DDS employing specifically customized PK able to interact with VCM through ionic and hydrophobic bonds [38,91,92]. PK were prepared according to a literature procedure [68], post-functionalized with potassium sulfanilate (PKSK) or sodium taurinate (PKT), and loaded with Vancomycin (VCM) at different pHs. All polymers were characterized by FT-IR, DSC, TGA, SEM, and elemental analysis, while NMR analysis was not performed due to the insolubility of PK, even after functionalization. The PKSK and PKT, before and after VCM loading, were further tested against the Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 strain and their antimicrobial activity compared to that of pure VCM.

2. Materials and Methods

Carbon monoxide and ethene were supplied by the SIAD Company, Bergamo, Italy (“research grade”, purity > 99.9%). Bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp), TsOH (p-toluene sulfonic acid), methanol (99.8%), diethyl ether (>99.5%), sulfanilic acid (≥98%), taurine (≥99%), sodium hydroxide (≥98%), potassium hydroxide (≥85%), m-cresol (99%), dimethyl sulfoxide (99%), agar, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), nutrient broth (NB), Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB), and vancomycin hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). MilliQ water was used for all experiments. The complexes [Pd(OAc)2(dppp)] were prepared as reported in the literature [93]. The Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 strain was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The 96-well microtiter microplates were purchased from Thermo Fisher (Milan, Italy).
The average viscosity molecular weight of PK was evaluated as the limit viscosity number (LVN), using m-cresol as a solvent, and the viscosity was measured by a Cannon–Fenske-type capillary viscosimeter, thermostated at 25 °C, as reported in the literature [93].
FT-IR spectroscopy was performed on a Nicolet AVATAR Nexus FT-IR Thermo Fisher Scientific spectrometer in KBr, with 32 scans and a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the wave number range between 4000 cm−1 and 400 cm−1. The melting and decomposition temperature and thermogravimetric analysis of the polymers was performed using a DSC/TGA Linseis PTA ST1000 (Selb, Germany) under a nitrogen flow of 100 mL/min, with a temperature ramp of 20 °C min−1 from 30 °C to 500 °C. Elemental analyses for carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur (CHNSO) were performed using a UNICUBE organic elemental analyzer (Elemental) (Tartu, Estonia). It offers highly sensitive analysis at a detection limit of 10 µg/g or 10 ppm. UV–Vis spectra were recorded on a UV Carey 100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) spectrophotometer in a glass cuvette in the range of 400–200 cm−1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out with a Zeiss Sigma|VP (Jena, Germany) variable-pressure instrument (VP-SEM), at 20 kV and variable magnifications. For SEM imaging, the samples were prepared by Au deposition (layer of about 40 nm) using AC sputtering.
Optical density measurement (OD600) was conducted using the BioTek Synergy H1, (Milano, Italy) a modular multimode microplate reader, with monochromator-based optics and filter-based optics. The optical density at 600 nm is referred to as OD600. The light at λ = 600 nm is easy to produce and does not damage or hinder microbial growth.

2.1. Synthesis of Aliphatic Polyketones (PK)

The reaction was conducted in a 250 mL stainless-steel autoclave equipped with a 150 mL Pyrex glass beaker. In a typical experiment, 2.10 mg of [Pd(OAc)2(dppp)] (0.003 mmol), 246.23 mg of p-TsOH (1.290 mmol), and 60 mL of methanol were mixed in a 150 mL Pyrex glass beaker and then placed in the autoclave. The autoclave was then sealed and pressurized with a 1/1 mixture of CO/C2H4 at 5.0 MPa and heated to 90 °C for 4 h with stirring. After cooling to room temperature, the solid product was collected, filtered, and washed three times with methanol, acetone, and diethyl ether. The resulting white powder polyketone (PK) was dried in a vacuum for approximately 8 h [93,94,95,96]. M.p. 250 °C; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): ν = 1690 (vs) (C=O), 2900 (s) (C-H), 1406 (s) (C-H), 1333 (s) (C-H), 1057 (s) (C-H). Elemental analysis (%) for PK found C 63.45, H 7.06, 0 29.49.

2.2. Synthesis of PKSK and PKT by Paal–Knorr Modification of PK with Potassium Sulfanilate or Sodium Taurinate

In a round-bottom flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a reflux condenser, 1.00 g of polyketone (PK) was suspended in 30 mL of methanol with 1.88 g potassium sulfanilate (0.09 mol) or 1.3g sodium taurinate (0.09 mol). The reaction mixture was heated at 70 °C for 48 h and, after cooling, was collected by filtration and washed with methanol, acetone, and diethyl ether. The resulting brown powder polyketone with potassium sulfanilate (PKSK) and orange powder polyketone with sodium taurinate (PKT) were dried in a vacuum for 8 h and characterized by FT-IR, DSC, TGA, elemental analysis, SEM, and OD600 measurements [96,97,98,99,100].
PKSK: M.p. 234 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 1. Elemental analysis (%) for PKSK found C 51.18, H 5.38, N 4.02, S 9.31.
PKT: M.p. 214 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 2. Elemental analysis (%) for PKT found C 54.76, H 6.5, N 1.66, S 4.23.

2.3. Loading of Vancomycin on PKSK or PKT

The loading of VCM on the functionalized polyketones (PKSK or PKT) following the same protocol and the sensitivity to pH were evaluated in DMSO solutions, in the 2.3–5.0–8.8 pH range (obtained by HCl or NaOH solutions, respectively) (pH 8+ DSA potentiometer, FAVS Scientific Equipment (Ferrara, Italy)) at room temperature. The polymer and Vancomycin, at a 2/1 wt/wt ratio, were suspended in 2mL DMSO (pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8) under stirring. After 20 min, the solution was dialyzed against MilliQ water with Spectra/Por 1 Dialysis Membrane Standard RC Tubing MWCO at 6–8 kD for 24 h to remove the remaining unabsorbed antibiotic. The concentration of unabsorbed antibiotic (Free-VCM) found in the MilliQ water was measured using UV at a wavelength of 281 nm [101,102,103]. The VCM encapsulation efficiency % (EE%) and loading capacity % (LC%) were determined as follows:
E E % = T o t a l V C M F r e e V C M T o t a l V C M × 100
L C % = T o t a l V C M F r e e V C M P o l y m e r + T o t a l V C M F r e e V C M × 100
Total VCM = the starting VCM amount used for the loading.
Polymer = the starting PKSK or PKT amount used for the loading considering no losses.
Samples were lyophilized and characterized by FT-IR, DSC, TGA, SEM, and OD600.
PKSK-VCM pH 2.3: M.p. 234 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 1. Elemental analysis (%) for PKSK-VCM pH 2.3 found C 50.87, H 4.96, N 4.36, S 7.67.
PKSK-VCM pH 5.0: M.p. 234 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 1. Elemental analysis (%) for PKSK-VCM pH 5.0 found C 47.38, H 3.87, N 7.13, S 2.37.
PKSK-VCM pH 8.8: M.p. 234 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 1. Elemental analysis (%) for PKSK-VCM pH 8.8 found C 48.76, H 4.28, N 5.86, S 5.10.
PKT-VCM pH 2.3: M.p. 214 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 2. Elemental analysis (%) for PKT-VCM pH 2.3 found C 53.14, H 5.63, N 2.10, S 3.75.
PKT-VCM pH 5.0: M.p. 214 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 2. Elemental analysis (%) for PKT-VCM pH 5.0 found C 49.35, H 3.46, N 7.73, S 1.12.
PKT-VCM pH 8.8: M.p. 214 °C; FT-IR data are reported in Table 2. Elemental analysis (%) for PKT-VCM pH 8.8 found C 52.78, H 4.71, N 3.66, S 3.41.

2.4. Vancomycin Release

The Vancomycin release from PKT-VCM and PKSK-VCM was assessed using test tubes containing 5.0 mL of PBS pH 7.4 with 5.0 mg of the sample and thermostated at 37 °C. The experiments were carried out in triplicate (without stirring) under sink conditions. The released antibiotics were quantified by UV at a wavelength of 281 nm [84,99,103].

2.5. Antibacterial Activity

Antimicrobial activity was determined by the standard liquid dilution method in nutrient broth (NB) medium. S. aureus ATCC 25923 cells were grown overnight at 37 °C in NB broth and diluted in the same medium for assays. In a 96-well sterile microtiter tray, 50 µL of bacteria from overnight culture (adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/mL) was added to the serial dilution of PKT-VCM and PKSK-VCM from 25 µg/mL and a final concentration of 0 mg/mL as a blank, in a total volume of 150 µL of NB. The 96-well microtiter tray was incubated at 37 °C, overnight, in a shaking incubator, and the cell growth was assessed by measuring the OD at 600 nm. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined as the lowest amount of antibiotic.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Post-Functionalized PK

The PK prepared according to the literature method [68] (Mw = 15.272 g mol−1, determined as reported by Vavasori and coworkers [93]) was post-functionalized by the Paal–Knorr reaction in the presence of sodium taurinate or potassium sulfanilate (1/1 molar ratio) at 70 °C, for 48 h, in methanol as a solvent (Scheme 1a,b). After the work-up (see Section 2), the solid polymers, recovered in high yields (2.30 g, 80% and 1.96 g, 85%, respectively, for PKSK and PKT), were characterized by FT-IR, DSC, TGA, SEM, and elemental analysis. Sodium taurinate and potassium sulfanilate were chosen to prepare a specific modified PK (PKSK and PKT) containing anionic functional groups, which should promote the interaction and immobilization of VCM.
Moreover, it is interesting to note that sodium taurinate and potassium sulfanilate were expected to improve the solubility of the post-functionalized polymers, yet both PKSK and PKT were not soluble in any conventional organic solvent or in water (at any pH).

3.2. Influence of pH on Vancomycin Loading

When seeking the best loading conditions, it is important to consider that VCM is a large molecule bearing six different acidic and basic functional groups with specific pKa (Figure 1). Thus, VCM is differently charged, ranging from −4 at pH > 13 to +2 at an acidic pH (~0) [104]; consequently, its reactivity towards PKSK and PKT will be influenced by the pH.
The PKSK and PKT were loaded with VCM at room temperature using a common protocol and operating at three different pH values (2.3, 5.0, 8.8) [84]. The polymers loaded with VCM, named PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM, were purified by dialysis and unabsorbed VCM measured by UV at 281 nm (Figure S1) [101,102,103], to determine the encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and loading capacity (LC%) (reported in Table 3; all experiments were performed in triplicate and all data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation).
The data reported in Table 3 show that, with both polymers, the maximum LC% and highest EE% were achieved at pH 5.0. These data were further confirmed by the elemental analysis, since the highest nitrogen content was determined at pH 5.0, confirming the presence of higher amounts of Vancomycin. At pH 2.3 or 8.8, a decrease in EE% of up to 34% for PKSK-VCM and 57% for PKT-VCM and in LC% between 8% and 21%, respectively, was registered. According to the literature, at pH 2.3, VCM has a higher positive charge (+2); therefore, this pH was supposed to be the optimal one for the loading on the anionic polyketones tested [104]. Nonetheless, the data reported in Table 3 clearly show that the highest VCM loading was obtained at pH 5.0, confirming that not only ionic but also hydrophobic interactions are important to promote VCM loading. Moreover, the higher encapsulation efficiency of PKSK-VCM as compared to PKT-VCM may be attributed to the stronger hydrophobic interactions between VCM and the aromatic functional groups present in PKSK [38,91,92,105].

3.3. PKT-VCM and PKSK-VCM Characterisation

PKT, PKSK, PKT-VCM, and PKSK-VCM were lyophilized and characterized by FT-IR, DSC, TGA, SEM, and elemental analysis. The FT-IR of PKSK, PKT, PKT-VCM, and PKSK-VCM, prepared at different pHs, showed modest differences, and no clear evidence of the presence of VCM in the FT-IR of PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM could be highlighted, probably due to the very low amount of antibiotic present with respect to the polymer. Nevertheless, the comparison of the FT-IR of the polymers before and after VCM loading shows a slight shift in the peaks in the range of 1010–1095 cm−1, corresponding to the SO3 groups, which are the functional groups most affected by the loading of VCM (see Figure S2 and Table 1 and Table 2). Additionally, the peaks corresponding to the aromatic rings present in PKSK also show a modest shift (813–832 cm−1 to 806 cm−1) (see Figure S2 and Table 1 and Table 2), suggesting that not only ionic but also hydrophobic interactions may contribute to drug retention [38,91].
To gain further information on the characteristics of the polymers prepared, thermal analyses (DSC, TGA) were performed (Figures S3 and S4). In agreement with the literature [106], due to the inferior amount of VCM used as compared to the polymer, no significant difference was observed between PKT and PKT-VCM or PKSK and PKSK-VCM.
Interestingly, the SEM analysis of PKT-VCM and PKSK-VCM with higher VCM loading (Table 3) showed evident differences between the polymers before and after VCM loading (Figure 2). The SEM images of the PK (Figure 2a) show pores with lamellate edges with an average size of 1.13 ± 0.05 μm, while, on the PKT surface (Figure 2b), the pores are smoother and less laminated, with poorly defined edges (0.48 ± 0.03 μm), probably due to the functionalization of the PK with sodium taurinate, leading to morphological changes. Similarly, the PKSK images (Figure 2c) showed a different morphology compared to the PK, due to the partial functionalization, although, in this case, pores were also visible (0.25 ± 0.02 μm). When VCM was loaded on the PKT or PKSK (Figure 2d and Figure 2e, respectively), the morphology of the polymers further changed. New particles with a smoother and rounder surface, with spherical geometry for PKT-VCM, were observed on the polymeric surface (PKT-VCM 0.64 ± 0.04 μm; PKSK-VCM 0.43 ± 0.04 μm). These particles were probably due to the presence of VCM in the samples.

3.4. Release of Vancomycin from PK Polymers

Different polymeric samples of PKSK and PKT loaded with VCM at different pHs (PKT-VCM 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 and PKSK-VCM 2.3, 5.0, 8.8; see Figure 3) were employed for the study of VCM release at physiological pH 7.4, analogously to the procedure reported by Ruiz et al. for a formulation of VCM on surface-modified polypropylene [84]. According to the data reported in Figure 3, it emerges that PKSK-VCM’s release trends are rather similar, while a wider gap exists for the release trends of PKT-VCM. Further, the release of VCM from PKSK-VCM 5.0 is slower compared to that of PKSK-VCM 2.3 and 8.8, further suggesting the higher strength of the interactions formed between PKSK and VCM at this specific pH. In contrast, the release trends of VCM from PKT-VCM prepared at different pHs show larger differences compared to those of PKSK-VCM, and the slowest release was obtained with PKT-VCM prepared at pH 2.3.
The difference in the VCM release profiles between the PKSK and PKT could be ascribed to the different chemical compositions of the post-functionalized polyketones. In fact, the PKSK and PKT were deliberately modified with different functional groups (all bearing an SO3−) but with different chemical backbones to highlight possible differences between the aromatic (PKSK) and aliphatic (PKT) functionalities present. Some minor differences between the two polymers were evidenced by FT-IR, but the release tests clearly highlighted the importance of the functional group present on the polymer. Thus, not only ionic but also hydrophobic interactions between the aromatic functionalities of sulfanilate and VCM contribute to strengthening the interaction between the drug and the polymer.

3.5. Antimicrobial Tests

To test PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM’s antibacterial activity, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) analyses were performed against Gram-positive bacterial strain Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MRSA), one of the main pathogens that can form biofilm infections [107,108]. Preliminarily tests against Staphylococcus aureus with PK, PKSK, and PKT, at concentrations between 0.2 and 2.0 log (µg/mL), showed the total inefficiency of the polymers against this bacterium (Figure S5).
The data obtained from the antimicrobial tests carried out in the presence of PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM are reported in Table 4 (with corresponding growth curves in Figure S6). These data once more clearly show the significant dependence of the efficiency of VCM loading on the pH. In particular, loading at pH 5.0 allowed us to achieve MIC values ~six times lower than that of VCM alone, with both polymers, while PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM loaded at pH 2.3 and 8.8 showed MIC values comparable to or higher than that of VCM alone.

4. Conclusions

In this work, VCM has been successfully loaded on two polymers (PKT, PKSK) obtained from PK modified with the Paal–Knorr reaction using sodium taurinate (T) and potassium sulfanilate (SK). The loading of VCM was studied at three different pHs, showing a substantial influence on the characteristics of the final polymeric formulation. Indeed, for both polymers, the best EE% and LC% were obtained at pH 5.0 (for PKSK EE% 75.00, LC% 31.03; PKT EE% 80.00, LC% 31.58), together with prolonged release. Interestingly, the MIC values obtained with PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM were six times lower than those of VCM alone. These optimal achievements might be the result of different interactions between the VCM and polymers, which were supposed to involve both ionic and hydrophobic interactions. Moreover, the pH used for loading has proven to be a very important variable, probably affecting the interactions occurring between the drug and the polymer. These results confirm the promising role of functionalized polyketones as DDS for VCM delivery; therefore, further studies are ongoing to understand the influence of the polymer structure in order to enhance the solubility and the loading mechanism. Moreover, the loading of different antibiotics on these polymers and their antibacterial activity will also be investigated.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym16131890/s1, Figure S1: UV-Vis spectra obtained for the calibration plot together with two example of samples (PKSK-VCM pH5.0 and PKSK-VCM pH 5.0) used for the quantification; Figure S2: FT-IR spectra of VCM and (A) PKT, PKT-VCM at pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 samples and (B) PKSK, PKSK-VCM at pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 samples; Figure S3: DSC of VCM and (A) PKSK, PKSK-VCM at pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 samples and (B) PKT, PKT-VCM at pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 samples; Figure S4: TGA of VCM and (A) PKSK, PKSK-VCM at pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 samples and (B) PKT, PKT-VCM at pH 2.3, 5.0, 8.8 samples; Figure S5: Growth curves of bacteria (expressed as normalized values of OD600) in presence of PK, PKT, PKSK at various concentrations (µg/mL); Figure S6: Growth curves of bacteria (expressed as normalized values of OD600) in presence of VCM at various concentrations (µg/mL) for PKSK (above) and PKT (below) samples at the different loading pH (2.3, 5.0, 8.8).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V., R.R. and V.B.; methodology, A.V., L.R., V.B. and R.R.; validation, P.R., M.M., G.S., V.B. and A.V.; formal analysis, A.V., R.R. and V.B.; investigation, M.M., R.R., G.S., V.B. and A.V.; resources, V.B. and A.V.; data curation, V.B., R.R. and A.V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.B. and R.R.; writing—review and editing, V.B., A.V. and G.S.; visualization, A.V. and V.B.; supervision, V.B. and A.V.; project administration, V.B.; funding acquisition, V.B. and A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Valentina Beghetto was employed by the company Crossing S.r.l. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morandini, A.; Spadati, E.; Leonetti, B.; Sole, R.; Gatto, V.; Rizzolio, F.; Beghetto, V. Sustainable triazine-derived quaternary ammonium salts as antimicrobial agents. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 28092–28096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Reece, R.; Beckwith, C.G. The Infectious Diseases Specialist, At Risk of Extinction. J. Infect. Dis. 2023, 228, 1649–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Momoh, A.O.; Asowata-Ayodele, A.M.; Olayemi, O.; David-Momoh, T. The comparative antimicrobial effects of castor, garlic, benniseed and bitter cola extracts on microorganisms isolated from hospitals’ wards. Microbes Infect. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shree, P.; Singh, C.K.; Sodhi, K.K.; Surya, J.N.; Singh, D.K. Bactericidal and biofilm eradication efficacy of a fluorinated benzimidazole derivative, TFBZ, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Med. Microecol. 2023, 16, 100084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.; Deshazer, H.; Rice, A.J.; Chen, K.; Zhou, C.; Kallenbach, N.R. Multivalent Antimicrobial Peptides as Therapeutics: Design Principles and Structural Diversities. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3436–3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bruni, G.; Maggi, L.; Tammaro, L.; Lorenzo, R.D.; Friuli, V.; D’Aniello, S.; Maietta, M.; Berbenni, V.; Milanese, C.; Girella, A.; et al. Electrospun fibers as potential carrier systems for enhanced drug release of perphenazine. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 511, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, A.; Makabenta, J.M.V.; Schlüter, F.; Landis, R.F.; Das, R.; Cuppels, M.; Rotello, V.M. Functionalized Polymers Enhance Permeability of Antibiotics in Gram-negative MDR Bacteria and Biofilms for Synergistic Antimicrobial Therapy. Adv. Ther. 2020, 3, 2000005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Soto, S.M. Role of Efflux Pumps in the Antibiotic Resistance of Bacteria Embedded in a Biofilm. Virulence 2013, 4, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sharma, A.; Gupta, V.K.; Pathania, R. Efflux pump inhibitors for bacterial pathogens: From bench to bedside Indian. J. Med. Res. 2019, 149, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, T.; Rong, F.; Tang, Y.; Li, M.; Feng, T.; Zhou, Q.; Li, P.; Huang, W. Targeted polymer-based antibiotic delivery system: A promising option for treating bacterial infections via macromolecular approaches. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 16, 101389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Xiao, X.; Wang, Z. Molecules that Inhibit Bacterial Resistance Enzymes. Molecules 2019, 24, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Pascale, G.; Wright, G.D. Antibiotic resistance by enzyme inactivation: From mechanisms to solutions. Chembiochem 2010, 11, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zgurskaya, H.I.; Rybenkov, V.V. Permeability barriers of Gram-negative pathogens. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020, 1459, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Montanaro, L.; Campoccia, D.; Arciola, C.R. Advancements in molecular epidemiology of implant infections and future perspectives. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 5155–5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abebe, G.M. Detection of Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance in Klebsiella Oxytoca and Klebsiella Pneumoniae from Animal Origin Foods. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Das, A.; Patro, S.; Simnani, F.Z.; Singh, D.; Sinha, A.; Kumari, K.; Rao, P.V.; Singh, S.; Kaushik, N.K.; Panda, P.K.; et al. Biofilm modifiers: The disparity in paradigm of oral biofilm ecosystem. Biomed. Pharmacother 2023, 164, 114966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Venter, H.; Henningsen, M.L.; Begg, S.L. Antimicrobial resistance in healthcare, agriculture and the environment: The biochemistry behind the headlines. Essays Biochem. 2017, 61, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rehman, S. A parallel and silent emerging pandemic: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) amid COVID-19 pandemic. J. Infect. Public Health. 2023, 16, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Larsson, D.G.J.; Flach, C.F. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Urban-Chmiel, R.; Marek, A.; Stępień-Pyśniak, D.; Wieczorek, K.; Dec, M.; Nowaczek, A. Osek, Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria-A Review. J. Antibiot. 2022, 11, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chin, K.W.; Michelle Tiong, H.L.; Luang-In, V.; Ma, N.L. The Role of Five-Membered Heterocycles in the Molecular Structure of Antibacterial Drugs Used in Therapy. Environ. Adv. 2023, 11, 100331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Morandini, A.; Leonetti, B.; Riello, P.; Sole, R.; Gatto, V.; Caligiuri, I.; Rizzolio, F.; Beghetto, V. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Bis-morpholine Triazine Quaternary Ammonium Salts. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 3172–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Malaekeh-Nikouei, B.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S.; Mirhadi, E.; Tajani, A.S.; Khameneh, B. The role of nanotechnology in combating biofilm-based antibiotic resistance. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 60, 101880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Birk, S.E.; Boisen, A.; Nielsen, L.H. Polymeric nano- and microparticulate drug delivery systems for treatment of biofilms. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 174, 30–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sousa, A.; Phung, A.N.; Škalko-Basnet, N.; Obuobi, S. Smart delivery systems for microbial biofilm therapy: Dissecting design, drug release and toxicological features. J. Control Release 2023, 354, 394–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Makhlouf, Z.; Ali, A.A.; Al-Sayah, M.H. Liposomes-Based Drug Delivery Systems of Anti-Biofilm Agents to Combat Bacterial Biofilm Formation. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sharma, S.; Mohler, J.; Mahajan, S.D.; Schwartz, S.A.; Bruggemann, L.; Aalinkeel, R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Elumalai, K.; Srinivasan, S.; Shanmugam, A. Review of the efficacy of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. J. Biomed. Technol. 2024, 5, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amidon, G.L.; Lennernäs, H.; Shah, V.P.; Crison, J.R. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: The correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 1995, 12, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.D.P.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnology 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Hussaniy, H.A.; Аlmajidi, Y.Q.; Oraibi, A.I.; Alkarawi, A.H. Nanoemulsions as medicinal components in insoluble medicines. Pharmacia 2023, 70, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yusuf, A.; Almotairy, A.R.Z.; Henidi, H.; Alshehri, O.Y.; Aldughaim, M.S. Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review of the Implication of Nanoparticles' Physicochemical Properties on Responses in Biological Systems. Polymers 2023, 15, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhuang, Y.; Shen, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, B.; Xiao, Z.; Dai, J. Aligned Scaffolds with Biomolecular Gradients for Regenerative Medicine. Polymers 2019, 11, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adepu, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status and Future Directions. Molecules 2021, 26, 5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, H.; Tan, P.; Fu, S.; Tian, X.; Zhang, H.; Ma, X.; Gu, Z.; Luo, K. Preparation and application of pH-responsive drug delivery systems. J. Control Release 2022, 348, 206–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yadav, S.K.; Yadav, B.; Kumar Gupta, M.; Harish, S. A Comprehensive Review on Solid Dispersion Technique to Enhance the Solubility and Bioavailability of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2023, 14, 106–117. Available online: https://www.ijppronline.com/index.php/IJPPR/article/view/313 (accessed on 10 May 2024). [CrossRef]
  37. Sole, R.; Buranello, C.; Di Michele, A.; Beghetto, V. Boosting physical-mechanical properties of adipic acid/chitosan films by DMTMM cross-linking. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 2009–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, S.; Alrobaian, M.M.; Molugulu, N.; Agrawal, N.; Numan, A.; Kesharwani, P. Pyramid-Shaped PEG-PCL-PEG Polymeric-Based Model Systems for Site-Specific Drug Delivery of Vancomycin with Enhance Antibacterial Efficacy. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 11935–11945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, M.R.; Seo, B.B.; Song, S.C. Dual ionic interaction system based on polyelectrolyte complex and ionic, injectable, and thermosensitive hydrogel for sustained release of human growth hormone. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 1327–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Palleria, C.; Di Paolo, A.; Giofrè, C.; Caglioti, C.; Leuzzi, G.; Siniscalchi, A.; De Sarro, G.; Gallelli, L. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction and their implication in clinical management. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2013, 18, 601–610. [Google Scholar]
  41. Stipa, P.; Marano, S.; Galeazzi, R.; Minnelli, C.; Mobbili, G.; Laudadio, E. Prediction of drug-carrier interactions of PLA and PLGA drug-loaded nanoparticles by molecular dynamics simulations. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 147, 110292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al Ragib, A.; Chakma, R.; Dewan, K.; Islam, T.; Kormoker, T.; Idris, A.M. Current advanced drug delivery systems: Challenges and potentialities. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2022, 76, 103727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Beghetto, V.; Gatto, V.; Conca, S.; Bardella, N.; Scrivanti, A. Polyamidoamide dendrimers and cross-linking agents for stabilized bioenzymatic resistant metal-free bovine collagen. Molecules 2019, 24, 3611–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, M.-Q.; Zou, H.; Liu, W.-B.; Liu, N.; Wu, Z.-Q. Bottlebrush Polymers Based on RAFT and the “C1” Polymerization Method: Controlled Synthesis and Application in Anticancer Drug Delivery. ACS Macro Lett. 2022, 11, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, C.; Zou, H.; Liu, N.; Wu, Z.-Q. Recent Advances in Polyallenes: Preparation, Self-Assembly, and Stimuli-Responsiveness. Chem. Asian J. 2021, 16, 3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, S.-Q.; Hu, G.; Xu, X.-H.; Kang, S.-M.; Liu, N.; Wu, Z.-Q. Synthesis of Redox-Responsive Core Cross-Linked Micelles Carrying Optically Active Helical Poly(phenyl isocyanide) Arms and Their Applications in Drug Delivery. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Larson, N.; Ghandehari, H. Polymeric Conjugates for Drug Delivery. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 840–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Irby, D.; Du, C.; Li, F. Lipid–Drug Conjugate for Enhancing Drug Delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 1325–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dalela, M.; Shrivastav, T.G.; Kharbanda, S.; Singh, H. pH-Sensitive Biocompatible Nanoparticles of Paclitaxel-Conjugated Poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) for Anticancer Drug Delivery in Solid Tumors of Syngeneic Mice. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 26530–26548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, F.; Jin, T. Polymer-Based Sustained-Release Dosage Forms for Protein Drugs, Challenges, and Recent Advances. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008, 9, 1218–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mansour, A.; Romani, M.; Acharya, A.B.; Rahman, B.; Verron, E.; Badran, Z. Drug Delivery Systems in Regenerative Medicine: An Updated Review. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Asadi, N.; Del Bakhshayesh, A.R.; Davaran, S.; Akbarzadeh, A. Common biocompatible polymeric materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 242, 122528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pei, X.; Wang, J.; Cong, Y.; Fu, J. Recent progress in polymer hydrogel bioadhesives. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 59, 1312–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, R.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, Y.; Yan, Y.; Gan, L.; Xu, J.; Zhou, G. Recent Advances in Biodegradable and Biocompatible Synthetic Polymers Used in Skin Wound Healing. Materials 2023, 16, 5459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zehetmaier, P.C.; Vagin, S.I.; Rieger, B. Functionalization of aliphatic polyketones. MRS Bull. 2013, 38, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bartsch, G.C.; Malinova, V.; Volkmer, B.E.; Hautmann, R.E.; Rieger, B. Biokompatibilität von CO-Alkene-Polymeren mit aus urologischen Geweben isolierten primären Zellen und undifferenzierten Zellen. BJU Int. 2007, 99, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Knorr, L. Synthese von pyrrolderivaten. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1884, 17, 1635–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brubaker, M.M.; Coffman, D.D.; Hoehn, H.H. Synthesis and Characterization of Ethylene/Carbon Monoxide Copolymers, A New Class of Polyketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 1509–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, Q.Y.; Wu, S.W. Methyl Fluorosulphonyldifluoroacetate; a New Trifluoromethylating Agent. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1989, 11, 705–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Green, M.J.; Lucy, A.R.; Lu, S.; Paton, R. Functionalisation of alkene–carbon monoxide alternating copolymers via transketalisation reactions. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 18, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, S.; Paton, R.M.; Green, M.J.; Lucy, A.R. Synthesis and characterization of polyketoximes derived from alkene-carbon monoxide copolymers. Eur. Pol. J. 1996, 32, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khansawai, P.; Paton, R.M.; Reed, D. Polyketones as alternating copolymers of carbon monoxide. Chem. Commun. 1999, 73, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nozaki, K.; Kosaka, N.; Graubner, V.M.; Hiyama, T. Methylenation of an Optically Active γ-Polyketone:  Synthesis of a New Class of Hydrocarbon Polymers with Main-Chain Chirality. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 6167–6168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Reuter, P.; Fuhrmann, R.; Mucke, A.; Voegele, J.; Rieger, B.; Franke, R. PCO/alkene copolymers as a promising class of biocompatible materials, 1. Examination of the in vitro toxicity. Macromol. Biosci. 2003, 3, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Matteoli, U.; Beghetto, V.; Scrivanti, A.; Aversa, M.; Bertoldini, M.; Bovo, S. An alternative stereoselective synthesis of (R)- and (S)-Rosaphen® via asymmetric catalytic hydrogenation. Chirality 2011, 23, 779–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Araya-Hermosilla, R.; Lima, G.M.R.; Raffa, P.; Fortunato, G.; Pucci, A.; Flores, M.E.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Broekhuis, A.A.; Picchioni, F. Intrinsic self-healing thermoset through covalent and hydrogen bonding interactions. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 81, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ratna, D. Handbook of Thermoset Resins; Smithers Rapra: Shawbury, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vavasori, A.; Ronchin, L. Polyketones: Synthesis and Applications. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  69. Araya-Hermosilla, E.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Araya-Hermosilla, R.; Flores, M.E.; Raffa, P.; Biver, T.; Pucci, A.; Picchioni, F.; Mattoli, V. pH-Responsive Polyketone/5,10,15,20-Tetrakis-(Sulfonatophenyl)Porphyrin Supramolecular Submicron Colloidal Structures. Polymers 2020, 12, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, N.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Z.-Q. Alkyne-Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Living Polymerization of Isocyanides: An Exploration of Diverse Structures and Functions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 3953–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, N.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Z.-Q. Helix-Induced Asymmetric Self-Assembly of π-Conjugated Block Copolymers: From Controlled Syntheses to Distinct Properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 2954–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Agostinelli, E.; Belli, F.; Tempera, G.; Mura, A.; Floris, G.; Toniolo, L.; Vavasori, A.; Fabris, S.; Momo, F.; Stevanato, R. Polyketone polymer: A new support for direct enzyme immobilization. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 127, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Araya-Hermosilla, E.; Parlanti, P.; Gemmi, M.; Mattoli, V.; Di Pietro, S.; Iacopini, D.; Granchi, C.; Turchi, B.; Fratini, F.; Di Bussolo, V.; et al. Functionalized aliphatic polyketones with germicide activity. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 35358–35366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cetinkaya, Y.; Falk, P.; Mayhall, C.G. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 686–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Levine, D.P. Vancomycin: A History. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 42, S5–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dinu, V.; Lu, Y.; Weston, N.; Lithgo, R.; Coupe, H.; Channell, G.; Adams, G.G.; Torcello Gómez, A.; Sabater, C.; Mackie, A.; et al. The antibiotic vancomycin induces complexation and aggregation of gastrointestinal and submaxillary mucins. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Newman, D.J. Old and modern antibiotic structures with potential for today’s infections. ADMET DMPK 2022, 10, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ottonello, A.; Wyllie, J.A.; Yahiaoui, O.; Sun, S.; Koelln, R.A.; Homer, J.A.; Johnson, R.M.; Murray, E.; Williams, P.; Bolla, J.R.; et al. Shapeshifting bullvalene-linked vancomycin dimers as effective antibiotics against multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e22087371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Willems, R.P.J.; Van Dijk, K.; Vehreschild, M.J.G.T.; Biehl, L.M.; Ket, J.C.F.; Remmelzwaal, S.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.J.E. Incidence of infection with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in carriers: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. O’Toole, R.F.; Leong, K.W.C.; Cumming, V.; Van Hal, S. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and the emergence of new sequence types associated with hospital infection. J. Res. Microbiol. 2023, 174, 104046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, X.; Hetjens, L.; Wolter, N.; Li, H.; Shi, X.; Pich, A. Charge-reversible and biodegradable chitosan-based microgels for lysozyme-triggered release of vancomycin. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 43, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Iglesias-Mejuto, A.; Magariños, B.; Ferreira-Gonçalves, T.; Starbird-Pérez, R.; Álvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Reis, C.P.; Ardao, I.; García-González, C.A. Vancomycin-loaded methylcellulose aerogel scaffolds for advanced bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 324, 121536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Shi, Z.; Hu, Y.; Li, X. Polymer mechanochemistry in drug delivery: From controlled release to precise activation. J. Control Release 2024, 365, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ruiz, J.C.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Taboada, P.; Burillo, G.; Bucio, E.; De Prijck, K.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T.; Concheiro, A. Polypropylene grafted with smart polymers (PNIPAAm/PAAc) for loading and controlled release of vancomycin. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 70, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zakeri-Milani, P.; Loveymi, B.D.; Jelvehgari, M.; Valizadeh, H. The characteristics and improved intestinal permeability of vancomycin PLGA-nanoparticles as colloidal drug delivery system. Colloids Surf. B. 2013, 103, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yousry, C.; Elkheshen, S.A.; El-laithy, H.M.; Essam, T.; Fahmy, R.H. Studying the influence of formulation and process variables on Vancomycin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles as potential carrier for enhanced ophthalmic delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 100, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hassan, D.; Omolo, C.A.; Fasiku, V.O.; Mocktar, C.; Govender, T. Novel chitosan-based pH-responsive lipid-polymer hybrid nanovesicles (OLA-LPHVs) for delivery of vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Thamvasupong, P.; Viravaidya-Pasuwat, K. Controlled Release Mechanism of Vancomycin from Double-Layer Poly-L-Lactic Acid-Coated Implants for Prevention of Bacterial Infection. Polymers 2022, 14, 3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sahiner, M.; Yilmaz, A.S.; Ayyala, R.S.; Sahiner, N. Carboxymethyl Chitosan Microgels for Sustained Delivery of Vancomycin and Long-Lasting Antibacterial Effects. Gels 2023, 9, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, W.-B.; Gao, R.-T.; Zhou, L.; Liu, N.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Z.-Q. Combination of vancomycin and guanidinium-functionalized helical polymers for synergistic antibacterial activity and biofilm ablation. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 10375–10382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sezer, A.D.; Kazak Sarılmışer, H.; Rayaman, E.; Çevikbaş, A.; Öner Akbuğa, E.T.J. Development and characterization of vancomycin-loaded levan-based microparticular system for drug delivery. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2017, 22, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Vinod, L.A.; Rajendran, D.; Shivashankar, M.; Chandrasekaran, N. Surface interaction of vancomycin with polystyrene microplastics and its effect on human serum albumin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vavasori, A.; Ronchin, L.; Quartarone, G.; Tortato, C. The catalytic copolymerization of ethene with carbon monoxide efficiently carried out in water/dichloromethane/sodium dodecylsulfate emulsion. Mod. Res. Catal. 2013, 2, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Vavasori, A.; Toniolo, L. Carbon monoxide-ethylene copolymerization catalyzed by a Pd(AcO)2/dppp/TsOH1 system: The promoting effect of water and of the acid. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1996, 110, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ataollahi, N.; Girardi, F.; Cappelletto, E.; Vezzù, K.; Di Noto, V.; Scardi, P.; Callone, E.; Di Maggio, R. Chemical modification and structural rearrangements of polyketone-based polymer membrane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ataollahi, N.; Vezzù, K.; Nawn, G.; Pace, G.; Cavinato, G.; Girardi, F.; Scardi, P.; Di Noto, V.; Di Maggio, R. A Polyketone-based Anion Exchange Membrane for Electrochemical Applications: Synthesis and Characterization. Electrochim. Acta. 2017, 226, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sole, R.; Gatto, V.; Conca, S.; Bardella, N.; Morandini, A.; Beghetto, V. Sustainable Triazine-Based Dehydro-Condensation Agents for Amide Synthesis. Molecules 2021, 26, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Toncelli, C.; Schoonhoven, M.J.; Broekhuis, A.A.; Picchioni, F. Paal-Knorr kinetics in waterborne polyketone-based formulations as modulating cross-linking tool in electrodeposition coatings. Mater. Des. 2016, 108, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Scrivanti, A.; Sole, R.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Beghetto, V.; Bardella, N.; Dolmella, A. Synthesis of new triazolyl-oxazoline chiral ligands and study of their coordination to Pd(II) metal centers. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2019, 498, 119129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ferreira, I.S.; Bettencourt, A.F.; Gonçalves, L.M.D.; Kasper, S.; Bétrisey, B.; Kikhney, J.; Moter, A.; Trampuz, A.; Almeida, A.J. Activity of daptomycin- and vancomycin-loaded poly-epsilon-caprolactone microparticles against mature staphylococcal biofilms. Nanomed. J. 2015, 10, 4351–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Le Ray, A.-M.; Chiffoleau, S.; Iooss, P.; Grimandi, G.; Gouyette, A.; Daculsi, G.; Merle, C. Vancomycin encapsulation in biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone) microparticles for bone implantation. Influence of the formulation process on size, drug loading, in vitro release and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Honary, S.; Ebrahimi, P.; Hadianamrei, R. Optimization of particle size and encapsulation efficiency of vancomycin nanoparticles by response surface methodology. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2014, 19, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kalhapure, R.S.; Mocktar, C.; Sikwal, D.R.; Sonawane, S.J.; Kathiravan, M.K.; Skelton, A.; Govender, T. Ion pairing with linoleic acid simultaneously enhances encapsulation efficiency and antibacterial activity of vancomycin in solid lipid nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 117, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Takacs-Novak, K.; Noszal, B.; Tòkés-Kovesdi, M.; Sz6sz, G. Acid-base properties and proton-speciation of vancomycin. Int. J. Pharm. 1993, 89, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Flores-Rojas, G.G.; Vázquez, E.; López-Saucedo, F.; Buendia-Gonzalez, L.; Vera-Graziano, R.; Mendizabal, E.; Bucio, E. Lignocellulosic membrane grafted with 4-vinylpiridine using radiation chemistry: Antimicrobial activity of loaded vancomycin. Cellulose 2023, 30, 3853–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bil, M.; Jurczyk-Kowalska, M.; Kopeć, K.; Heljak, M. Study of Correlation between Structure and Shape-Memory Effect/Drug-Release Profile of Polyurethane/Hydroxyapatite Composites for Antibacterial Implants. Polymers 2023, 15, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Avila-Novoa, M.G.; Solis-Velazquez, O.A.; Guerrero-Medina, P.J.; González-Gómez, J.P.; González-Torres, B.; Velázquez-Suárez, N.Y.; Martínez-Chávez, L.; Martínez-Gonzáles, N.E.; De la Cruz-Color, L.; Ibarra-Velázquez, L.M.; et al. Genetic and compositional analysis of biofilm formed by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food contact surfaces. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1001700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Beghetto, V.; Gatto, V.; Samiolo, R.; Scolaro, C.; Brahimi, S.; Facchin, M.; Visco, A. Plastics today: Key challenges and EU strategies towards carbon neutrality: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 334, 122102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of Vancomycin [84].
Figure 1. Molecular structure of Vancomycin [84].
Polymers 16 01890 g001
Scheme 1. Synthetic scheme for the preparation of post-functionalized PK with (a) sodium taurinate (PKT) and (b) potassium sulfanilate (PKSK).
Scheme 1. Synthetic scheme for the preparation of post-functionalized PK with (a) sodium taurinate (PKT) and (b) potassium sulfanilate (PKSK).
Polymers 16 01890 sch001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) PK, (b) PKT, (c) PKSK, (d) PKT-VCM (pH 5.0), (e) PKSK-VCM (pH 5.0).
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) PK, (b) PKT, (c) PKSK, (d) PKT-VCM (pH 5.0), (e) PKSK-VCM (pH 5.0).
Polymers 16 01890 g002
Figure 3. Vancomycin release at pH 7.4 from PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM prepared at different pHs (2.3, 5.0, 8.8).
Figure 3. Vancomycin release at pH 7.4 from PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM prepared at different pHs (2.3, 5.0, 8.8).
Polymers 16 01890 g003
Table 1. FT-IR data of PKSK and PKSK-VCM samples at pH 2.3, 5, 8.8.
Table 1. FT-IR data of PKSK and PKSK-VCM samples at pH 2.3, 5, 8.8.
PKSKPKSK-VCM
pH 2.3
PKSK-VCM
pH 5
PKSK-VCM
pH 8.8
Functional GroupsNote
Wavenumbers (cm−1)
685xxxẟ C=C
ẟ C=C-H
Strong
813, 832806806806ẟ C=C-H
ẟ C=C
Weak
1010, 1035, 10571015, 1035, 10571015, 1035, 10571015, 1035, 1057ν S=O
ν C-N
ẟ C=C-H
Change in relative intensity
1124112411241124ν C-N
1164~1195~1195~1195ν C-N
ν C=O
Sharp for PKSK, broad for all other samples
1246, 1259126012601260ν C=O
ν C-N
Change in relative intensity
1335133513351335ν S=O
ẟ C-H
xx13841384ν S=O
1408, 14261408, 14261408, 14261408, 1426ν S=O
ν C=C-H
1499149914991499ẟ C=C-HChange in relative intensity
1693169316931693ν C=O
2852, 2912, 29632852, 2912, 29632852, 2912, 29632852, 2912, 2963ν C-H
3437343734373437ν OH
Table 2. FT-IR data of PKT and PKT-VCM samples at pH 2.3, 5, 8.8.
Table 2. FT-IR data of PKT and PKT-VCM samples at pH 2.3, 5, 8.8.
PKTPKT-VCM
pH 2.3
PKT-VCM
pH 5
PKT-VCM
pH 8.8
Functional GroupsNote
Wavenumbers (cm−1)
812812812812ẟ C=C-H
ẟ C=C
10541023, 1054, 10951023, 1054, 10951023, 1054, 1095ν S=O
ν C-N
ẟ C=C-H
1023 and 1095 shoulders of the central peak
1198~1198~1198~1198ν C-N
ν C=O
Broader for PKT-VCM samples
1259125912591259ν C=O
ν C-N
1336133613361336ν S=O
ẟ C-H
x138413841384ν S=O
1409, 14271409, 14271409, 14271409, 1427ν S=O
ν C=C-H
1470147014701470ẟ C=C-HWeak and broad change in relative intensity
1693169316931693ν C=O
2853, 2913, 29532852, 2918, 29622852, 2918, 29622852, 2918, 2962ν C-H
~3439~3439~3439~3439ν OH
Table 3. Elemental analysis of PKT, PKSK, PKT-VCM, and PKSK-VCM. EE% and LC% of PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM.
Table 3. Elemental analysis of PKT, PKSK, PKT-VCM, and PKSK-VCM. EE% and LC% of PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM.
SamplepHElementals (%)EE%LC%
NS
PKSK-4.02 ± 0.019.31 ± 0.02--
PKSK-VCM2.34.36 ± 0.027.67 ± 0.0141.25 ± 0.0323.08 ± 0.01
PKSK-VCM5.07.13 ± 0.012.37 ± 0.0375.00 ± 0.0231.03 ± 0.01
PKSK-VCM8.85.86 ± 0.015.10 ± 0.0166.66 ± 0.0125.00 ± 0.02
PKT-1.66 ± 0.034.23 ± 0.02--
PKT-VCM2.32.10 ± 0.013.75 ± 0.0323.08 ± 0.0110.71 ± 0.02
PKT-VCM5.07.73 ± 0.021.12 ± 0.0180.00 ± 0.0231.58 ± 0.01
PKT-VCM8.83.66 ± 0.033.41 ± 0.0342.67 ± 0.0215.15 ± 0.03
Table 4. MIC values for PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM loaded at variable pH, tested against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MRSA).
Table 4. MIC values for PKSK-VCM and PKT-VCM loaded at variable pH, tested against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MRSA).
SamplepHMIC (µg/mL)
PKSK-VCM2.31.44
PKSK-VCM5.00.23
PKSK-VCM8.81.56
PKT-VCM2.32.68
PKT-VCM5.00.24
PKT-VCM8.83.79
VCM 1.54
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rampazzo, R.; Vavasori, A.; Ronchin, L.; Riello, P.; Marchiori, M.; Saorin, G.; Beghetto, V. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Vancomycin Loaded on Functionalized Polyketones. Polymers 2024, 16, 1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131890

AMA Style

Rampazzo R, Vavasori A, Ronchin L, Riello P, Marchiori M, Saorin G, Beghetto V. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Vancomycin Loaded on Functionalized Polyketones. Polymers. 2024; 16(13):1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rampazzo, Rachele, Andrea Vavasori, Lucio Ronchin, Pietro Riello, Martina Marchiori, Gloria Saorin, and Valentina Beghetto. 2024. "Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Vancomycin Loaded on Functionalized Polyketones" Polymers 16, no. 13: 1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131890

APA Style

Rampazzo, R., Vavasori, A., Ronchin, L., Riello, P., Marchiori, M., Saorin, G., & Beghetto, V. (2024). Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Vancomycin Loaded on Functionalized Polyketones. Polymers, 16(13), 1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131890

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop