Next Article in Journal
Polymer Dynamics: Bulk and Nanoconfined Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Progress in Aromatic Polyimide Films for Electronic Applications: Preparation, Structure and Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 6
10.3390/polym14061270
Review Report
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Density-Dependent Modified Doraivelu Model for the Cold Compaction of Poly (Ether Ketone Ketone) Powders

Polymers 2022, 14(6), 1270; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061270
by Fan Xu 1,2,*, Huixiong Wang 1,2,*, Xuelian Wu 1, Zihao Ye 1 and Hong Liu 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2022, 14(6), 1270; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061270
Submission received: 14 February 2022 / Revised: 15 March 2022 / Accepted: 17 March 2022 / Published: 21 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Physics and Theory)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is well organized and overall, well written. The scientific content is most of the time well described and the findings can be useful for many researchers and companies interested in this technology. Therefore, I believe the manuscript could be published.

Author Response

Thank you for agreeing with my article.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

You provided a detailed description of how the research was done.
Advantages and disadvantages of the Euler integration method (critical approach) in the context of the step-by-step method used by the Authors and the characteristics of the differences between the methods were also described favorably from the point of view of the quality of the article.
In the article, You compile the results of real tests and their simulations - I agree that this is the correct research path that allows you to save time and conduct ineffective tests, but I suggest that you need to complete the information on real tests and the starting material that forms the basis of the simulation .
The article lacks precise information and characteristics of the base material on which the simulations are based.
The research process, the degree of compaction, and the pressure effect are described, but the information on the materials was described in a 'negligible' (sparse) manner.
The article is interesting and beneficial from a scientific and practical point of view, but after supplementing the information about the base material (in the form of photos, test results, e.g. density or strength, because this test is described along with simulation or even photos of the microstructure of the working material.
Thank You for Your work and Best Regards,
Reviewer

Author Response

Thanks for your valuable comments. we have made some modifications on the paper. We have added some test results to the draft and discussed these results. We believe these test results will significantly improve the overall quality of this paper.All the changes in the draft make use of the revision function, and the font is red.  We would appreciate the reviewer give a second look. As always, we appreciate your valuable time on reviewing our paper, and all your comments and suggestions will be considered.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop