Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Mechanical Performance of Sustainable Bio-Based Compounds”
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Micro Silica Filler Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Based Composite Material
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/polym14224831
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bibliometrics of Functional Polymeric Biomaterials with Bioactive Properties Prepared by Radiation-Induced Graft Copolymerisation: A Review

by
Mostafa Yusefi
1,
Mohamed Mahmoud Nasef
1,2,*,
Mohammad Ali Tareq
3,
Bhuvanesh Gupta
4,
Kamyar Shameli
1,
Roshafima Rasit Ali
1,2,
Teo Ming Ting
5 and
Hesham Ali El Enshasy
6,7,*
1
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
2
Advanced Materials Research Group, Center of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Putra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
3
Department of Management of Technology, Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
4
Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi 110016, India
5
Radiation Processing Technology Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
6
Institute of Bioproduct Development (IBD), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
7
City of Scientific Research and Technology Applications (SRTA), New Burg Al Arab, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(22), 4831; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224831
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biobased and Biodegradable Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Functional polymeric biomaterials (FPBMs) with bioactive characteristics obtained by radiation-induced graft copolymerisation (RIGC) have been subjected to intensive research and developed into many commercial products. Various studies have reported the development of a variety of radiation-grafted FPBMs. However, no reports dealing with the quantitative evaluations of these studies from a global bibliographic perspective have been published. Such bibliographic analysis can provide information to overcome the limitations of the databases and identify the main research trends, together with challenges and future directions. This review aims to provide an unprecedented bibliometric analysis of the published literature on the use of RIGC for the preparation of FPBMs and their applications in medical, biomedical, biotechnological, and health care fields. A total of 235 publications obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) in the period of 1985–2021 were retrieved, screened, and evaluated. The records were used to manifest the contributions to each field and underline not only the top authors, journals, citations, years of publication, and countries but also to highlight the core research topics and the hubs for research excellence on these materials. The obtained data overviews are likely to provide guides to early-career scientists and their research institutions and promote the development of new, timely needed radiation-grafted FPBMs, in addition to extending their applications.

1. Introduction

Functional polymeric biomaterials (FPBMs) are a class of materials that is receiving increasing interest because of their relevance to applications in various areas impacting human life and living [1]. FPBMs represent the most popular usage of natural, synthetic, or hybrid polymeric materials interacting with biological regimes and are used to protect against microbes and regenerate, repair, and treat any type of tissue in the organs, or improve the functions of the human body [2]. Thus, the research on FPBMs has enabled the development of various implants, medical devices, drug carriers, and scaffolds for tissue engineering with greater antimicrobial resistance, biocompatibility, and biofunctionality together with lower cytotoxicity against malignant cells [3]. FPBMs can be developed using various methods involving surface treatment such as etching, metallisation, ion sputtering, chemical grafting, and radiation-induced graft copolymerisation (RIGC) with low-energy radiation sources (plasma, laser treatment, and UV lamp) and high-energy radiation sources such as γ-rays and electron beam (EB) [4]. Each modification method has its pros and cons, and the selection of a particular method usually controls the developed topical structure and the level as well as the stability of the enhanced properties conferred to the polymer substrates.
Of all methods, RIGC is a distinctive technique for modification of polymer substrates that has been known for the past six decades. The versatility of this method is derived from its ability to permanently modify polymeric substrates by imparting new functionalities originated for the incoming polar monomers (acrylic or vinylic monomers) without compromising the inherent properties of the parent polymers. Such versatility enabled this technology to be used to develop many hybrid polymeric materials with desired properties [5,6,7,8]. The advantages of this method over its well-established chemically induced counterpart are not only in its ability to meticulously control the grafting yield by manipulation of the grafting parameters and the absence of detrimental impurities that maintain the purity of the product but also in the consumption of fewer chemicals and the ability to overcome product shaping problems. This is because grafting reactions can be started with polymer substrates of different physical forms, including films, non-woven fabric, particles, and fibres. Moreover, RIGC is also capable of achieving bulk modifications in the substrates when using γ-rays and EB sources, with the capability to scale up grafted products compared to plasma- and UV-induced grafting, which are limited to laboratory scale [9,10].
RIGC works by exposing a polymer substrate to ionising radiation, leading to the generation of active sites or radicals. The formed radicals initiate copolymerisation when exposed to monomer molecules, forming macroradicals that allow propagation of the molecular chains to form side chain grafts when terminated. RIGC can be carried out by the direct interaction between the monomer and the polymer substrate during irradiation, and this method is called simultaneous radiation grafting. Alternatively, the polymer substrate is initially irradiated and subsequently brought in contact with the monomer molecules in a separate step, and the technique is called pre-irradiation grafting. Introducing functional groups can be made by direct grafting of functional (acrylic) monomers or by a post-grafting reaction upon grafting vinylic monomers. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram representing the preparation of functional polymeric materials by irradiation, grafting of the monomer, and subsequent functionalisation. More details on RIGC methods, including their advantages and disadvantages, can be found elsewhere [11].
RIGC has been extensively used to endow interesting functional characteristics such as hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, ion conduction, metal ion binding capacity, adhesion, microbial and fouling resistance, and biocompatibility to different polymer substrates. This led to the development of various functional polymeric materials through the integration of various monomer/polymer combinations enduring desired characteristics to polymer substrates. The resultant radiation-grafted functional materials’ applications include battery separators [12,13,14], polymer electrolyte membranes [15,16], chelating adsorbents [17,18,19], ion exchange membranes [20,21], and FPBMs [6,22].
Particularly, the application of RIGC for the development of FPBMs is one of the areas that has received paramount efforts since the early days of the technique’s invention by A. Chapiro (a French scientist) [23] and A. Charlesby (a British scientist) [24]. Subsequently, many researchers used this technique to make enormous contributions to designing and developing innovative materials for medical, biomedical, health care, and biotechnological applications. Figure 2 shows some examples of FPBMs prepared by RIGC for various applications. This leads to the emergence of many potential radiation-grafted materials with great potential for commercialisation, and this field seems to be broadly opening for imaginative future developments.
Several articles have been devoted to reviewing the use of RIGC for the development of adsorbents for purifications and separations in environmental applications, including wastewater treatment and CO2 capture [25,26], polymer electrolyte membranes and separators for energy conversion and storage [9,10,27], and protein capture [21]. The preparation and applications of biomaterials such as stimuli-responsive polymer systems and their polymer-biomolecule (protein) conjugates were also reviewed on two occasions [28,29]. Likewise, the use of RIGC or crosslinking to produce hydrogels of various size ranges (microgels and nanogels) and their applications in various medical and biomedical applications were extensively reviewed in many publications [30,31,32,33,34] with some attention recently paid to reviewing current approaches for crosslinking polysaccharides for hydrogel formation [35]. On the other hand, FPBMs obtained by RIGC have also been reviewed on various occasions, but with the focus limited to biomedical applications [6,26,27,28,29], cell sheet engineering, and the characteristics of thermo-responsive scaffolds [36,37]. Most of the published reviews mainly discussed strategies to construct a variety of radiation-grafted biomaterials with desired structure, properties, dynamic functionality, and biological complexity, taking the target application into account and elaborating on the challenges to the endurance of the imparted functionality. Nevertheless, there is no review reported to evaluate the accumulated publication of the research articles on radiation-grafted FPBMs and their broadly tested applications in the fields of medical, biomedical, biotechnological, and healthcare applications from a global bibliometric perspective.
Bibliometric analysis is a scientific computer-assisted review based on statistical methodology that allows the evaluation of a large amount of written research publications (articles and books) related to given academic topics [38]. This tool grants quantitative analysis of citations in databases such as the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus to establish not only inter-relationships and impacts of publications in research area but also allows for the efficient identification of core research, influential studies, authors, journals, years of funding organisations, and countries as well as their relationship [39]. The benefit of bibliometric analysis makes it useful for assessing research trends in a variety of fields and the quality of research output, overcoming the limitations of databases, and identifying the factors required for developing new research projects in a time-effective manner [40,41]. This would certainly provide valuable assistance to the research triangle involving researchers, funders, and policymakers.
Bibliometric analysis studies covering various materials-related fields, such as polymer composites for energy storage [42], antibacterial dental adhesive [43], artificial extracellular matrices based on tissue engineering technology [44], liquid membranes [45], enzyme immobilisation [40,46], and chitosan coating for fruits [41], have appeared in the literature recently. However, there have been no bibliometric reviews of radiation-grafted materials and their applications in various fields.
The objective of this article is to report a systematic bibliometric analysis for evaluating the literature published on radiation-grafted FPBMs and their applications in medical, biomedical, biotechnological, and healthcare fields. The bibliometric analysis was carried out based on keywords, co-citations, and performance. The scope of the data mapping included citation analysis and literature distributions with respect to progress in the field of application of radiation-grafted bioactive materials, journals, authors, institutions, and countries in terms of their research output in the period of 1985–2021. The data mapping used various visualisation software such as VOSViewer and CiteSpace to present the information.

2. Data Collection and Methods

The initial data mining was carried out between 15 and 22 August 2021 using the WoS database. The principal theme was publications containing the query keywords “radiation grafted functional biopolymers *, OR bioactive surfaces *, OR medical *, OR biotechnological *, OR biomedical *, OR health care *” in the titles or in the abstracts. A total of 8854 records were found, including 5624 articles, 114 book chapters, 1026 proceeding papers, 38 books, 38 editorial materials, 190 meeting abstracts, and 1824 reviews. The noise in the records was high as the basic search was carried out using the booleans “OR” and Field Tag “TS = Topic”. Titles, abstracts, and keywords of the 8854 records were individually checked, and 357 records were identified as related to our interest. Later, these records were carefully screened by reading each paper, taking into consideration the relevance and scope of the topic of interest, and finally 235 papers linked to the investigated applications were finalised for the period of 1985–2021. These 235 articles were searched on the WOS database for extracting the full bibliometric records needed for scientometric analysis. The metadata on the selected 235 articles on radiation-grafted FPBMs was transferred into Microsoft Excel (for Windows 10), BibTex (version 0.99d), and plain text formats suitable for bibliometric analysis using BibExcel (version 2016-02-20) and for visualisation using Biblioshiny (RStudio) (version 3.6.1), VOSViewer (version 1.6.15), and CiteSpace (version 5.3.R9). Particularly, BibExcel was used to conduct the descriptive analysis on the sample dataset once the data were checked for duplication and missing information using Microsoft Excel. The Biblioshiny (RStudio), VOSViewer, and CiteSpace were used for the network and other visualisations for the analyses of citations and references, which supports several types of bibliometrics meeting the needs of visual analytic tasks to depict a systematic review visually. The open-source package Biblioshiny is used in the R language environment, where bibliometrics allowed the completion of the process of the scientific literature analysis and data processing [47]. Biblioshiny, on the other hand, was used to perform pertinent bibliometric and visual analysis based on an interactive web interface. CiteSpace and VOSViewer were used to create the co-occurrence of the keyword network and cluster network. VOSviewer was used to obtain and visualise bibliometric records with regards to popular keywords, citation records, and publication and collaboration networks as reported elsewhere [48]. The bibliometric analysis focuses on the present status, whereas the content analysis helps to describe the structural framework of the literature on radiation-grafted FPBMs. Figure 3 illustrates the multi-step strategy used to evaluate the bibliometrics of FPBMs by RIGC.
The collected 235 references were further sorted out manually based on the specific applications of FPBMs prepared by RIGC that were categorised into four main areas: medical, biomedical, biotechnological, and healthcare applications. Each of these areas was divided into a few classes based on the reported applications. The contribution percentage of each class of applications was estimated by considering the ratio of the number of publications in each class and the total number of publications on FPBMs. The overall classifications were tabulated with their relevant references, and the class percentage data was graphically presented. The applications, which have very rare publications, such as gene delivery [49,50], were ignored, although they might be appealing for preparation with other methods falling beyond the scope of this article.
The keyword analysis network that was carried out to observe the changes in the research themes was sorted out from the cloud generated from the titles and abstracts of the collected sample of the articles. The network visualisation and density mapping of the co-occurrence of the keywords related to the radiation-grafted FPBMs were presented in four interrelated groups. The size of the nodes represents the frequency of the keywords, and the thickness of the links between two nodes represents the co-occurrence of the keywords. The keyword network of publications and co-cited references was clustered, and their co-occurrence was visualised, taking the timeline into consideration. The network was clearly defined, and we considered the co-citation clusters. The clusters were labelled by the index terms selected from the citation frequencies that were arranged vertically in the descending order of the cluster size, and the curves represent the co-citation links between clusters.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Classification and Applications of FPBMs Prepared by RIGC

The design of FPBMs by RIGC was found to focus on the broad aspects of polymer surface modifications, inculcating antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation prevention, biocompatibility, cytotoxicity resistance, bio-functionality, control-release of therapeutic agents in drug delivery, and healing functionalities in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [2]. The advantages of this method for the preparation of FPBMs include the use of high-energy radiation for clean initiation (without chemical initiators) and the ability to obtain sterilised products [51]. Applications of FPBMs prepared by RIGC have been frequently reported in the literature, which prevailed the emergence of many urgently needed innovative materials capable of meeting the requirements of diversified applications [6]. Particularly, radiation-grafted FPBMs, such as drug release carriers [52,53], antimicrobial surgical sutures [54], thermo-responsive cell culture plates [55], scaffolds for tissue engineering [56], water-absorbing polymers [57], enzyme carriers [58], antimicrobial catheters [59], implants [60], antimicrobial gauze [61], antimicrobial fabrics [62,63], antibacterial food packing films [64,65], and antifouling membranes [66], have been widely investigated to design efficient, safe, and viable products. Such a wide spectrum of applications emphasises a need for a deep understanding of the knowledge underlying not only radiation chemistry and radiation processing of polymers but also biomedicine, biochemistry, and biomaterials characteristics. The various applications of FPBMs can be classified into four categories, including: (i) medicine, (ii) biomedicine, (iii) biotechnology, and (iv) healthcare, as shown in Table 1.
The percentage of each category and class relative to the total number of articles, together with the distribution of publication on FPBMs prepared by RIGC, are illustrated in Figure 4. It can be observed from Figure 4A that the biomedical field occupied the highest number of applications with 37% of the total publications, followed by 27% for medical, 19% for biotechnological, and 17% for healthcare applications. On the other hand, the percentage of individual applications with respect to the overall publications revealed that the drug carrier/release is the most investigated application with 21.33%, followed by antimicrobial fabrics and films (12%), surgical sutures (11.33%), scaffolds for tissue engineering (8.67%), antifouling membranes (8%), cell culture plates (7.33%), supports for enzyme immobilisation and release (6.67%), catheters (6%), implants (4.67%), biosensors (4.67%), packing films (2.67%), and protective face masks (2%). It is not a surprise that the drug carrier/release application has the highest contribution, and this reflects the significance and wide investigation for such an application since the early days of realising the significance of RIGC. Moreover, this application has unlimited potential to provide drug delivery therapies and devices for many diseases, making such an application a source of innovation and promising technologies. The smallest contribution came from the application protective face masks, which is most likely caused by the high cost of such masks compared with the prices of normal surgical face masks. Nevertheless, the emergence of iodine-containing face masks, which was triggered by the outbreak of the swine flu (H1N1) pandemic in 2009 and commercialised by Ebara Clean Environment Co., Ltd., Japan [63], provides a potential area for further development of new fabrics for masks and coatings with antimicrobial/antiviral properties for combating the outbreak of viruses such as the Corona virus.

3.2. Distribution of Publications on FPBMs Prepared by RIGC (1985–2021)

A total of 235 records were found to be appropriate after selecting the entire results from the publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC in the English language literature in the WoS in the period of 1985–2021. As shown in Figure 4B, the entire distribution was classified into eight published sources, which were mainly articles (151 articles = 63.98%) and reviews (48 articles = 20.34%). A total of 186 of these records, representing 78.96%, could be found through the subscribed journals, and the rest were available in their open access counterparts. The average total citation (TC) per the published documents was 164.23, showing the popularity of FPBMs prepared by RIGC for various advanced biomedical demands. The average number of authors per published document was found to be 1.75. The documents related to FPBMs by RIGC were published under various disciplines, including “Physics, Materials, and Chemistry”, followed by “Molecular Biology, and Immunology” and “Medicine, Medical and Clinical Applications”.

3.3. Number Annual of Publications on Application of FPBMs Prepared by RIGC since 1985

Figure 5 indicates the growing trend in FPBMs prepared by RIGC over the last four decades. The number of annual publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC indicates the presence of an unsteady growth rate. The entire period of 37 years (1985–2021) can be approximately divided into two periods: an initial explorative period until 2002 and a progressive period from 2003 onward. Prior to 2003, the field started to grow slowly, as indicated by the number of documents that were published. Particularly, this period witnessed a growing level of support from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to various activities related to the applications of radiation chemistry in biomaterial and bioengineering fields, including three consecutive coordinated research project programmes (CRP) that started in 1983. The first project was on “radiation technology for immobilisation of bioactive materials” in the period of 1983–1987 [193], followed by another project on “radiation processing technology applications in bioengineering” in the period of 1988–1994 [194], and the third one on the “use of radiation processing to prepare biomaterials for applications in medicine” (1996–2000) [195]. This led to a remarkable increase in the number of publications after 2007, in which more than 72% of the studies were published, and the highest annual publication percentage was in 2012 (8.97%). The period of 2009–2021 also witnessed another CRP from the IAEA, focusing on nanoscale radiation engineering of advanced materials for biomedical applications, which involves the use of ionising radiation in the synthesis, modification, and characterisation of nanogels, nanoparticles, nanovehicles, nanoporous membranes, and surfaces with enhanced biocompatibility for potential biomedical applications, such as cell sheet engineering and artificial tissue construction, diagnostics and imaging, and drug delivery [196].

3.4. Leading Journals for Publication Related to FPBMs Prepared by RIGC

Table 2 shows the most influential journals associated with the published articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC, taking into consideration the total publications (TP) and TC. The list of journals is headed by Radiation Physics and Chemistry, followed by the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, ACTA Biomaterialia, Progress in Polymer Science, Biomaterials, Polymer, Macromolecules, Materials and Langmuir. It can be seen that seven out of ten of the most influential journals for publishing articles on the preparation of FPBMs by RIGC are falling in the Q1 quartile index ranking in WoS, with three of these journals being published in the UK, two in the Netherlands, and two in the USA. The sequence of leading publishers is Elsevier (eight journals), the American Chemical Society (two journals), Wiley (one journal), and MDPI (one journal). Of all journals, the journal of Radiation Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier) is ranked first in the number of publications with 28 articles (11.96%) and a TC of 904 despite being the second-lowest in terms of IF (i.e., 2.858 in 2021) in this list. This was followed by the Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Wiley) with an IF of 3.057 (in 2021) with 16 articles (6.83%) and a TC of 856. Interestingly, the Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Wiley) published the first study on FPBMs by RIGC in 1985 [82]. Progress in Polymer Science journal, with the highest IF of 31.28 in 2021, is in the middle of this list with only eight articles (3.41%), albeit with the highest TC of 5506 due to its widely established reputation as an international journal for publishing review articles only. The open-access journal “Materials” from MDPI is the second-last of the listed journals, and this is because it is a new journal in the area of FPBMs prepared by RIGC.

3.5. Highly Cited Published Articles

Highly Cited Review Articles

Among the search results, many review articles addressing different types of FPBMs prepared by RIGC were published and subjected to analysis in this study, although they might not provide sufficient research progress indications as they only reviewed the progress that was limited to several years before the submission time. Table 3 shows the top 10 highly cited review articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC. Five review articles that were published in Nature Materials [107], Advanced Materials [197], Seminars in Immunology [198], Progress in Polymer Science [29], and Progress in Polymer Science [199] received the highest citations in the period of 2004–2010 with a TC of 4011, 2689, 2648, 1976, and 1059, respectively. The major contributions in these top five review articles came from the research groups in the US [29,197,198,199]. It can be noticed from the table that half of the top 10 highly cited review articles fall in the open access literature, which is freely accessible worldwide.

3.6. Highly Cited Research Articles

Table 4 indicates the top 10 highly cited research articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC and their relevant applications such as controlled drug delivery systems, cell culture plates, biosensors, antimicrobial surfaces, and implants. The first most-cited research article by Dutch researchers was published in the Macromolecule Journal in 1993 (919 TC) [152]. Okano and co-workers [118] (researchers from Japan) published the second-most-cited article on an essential tissue engineering related to FPBMs prepared by RIGC, which obtained a TC of 792. In this article, the surface of the tissue culture polystyrene dishes was successfully grafted onto a temperature-responsive polymer (poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)) using electron beam irradiation to obtain hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces below and above 32 °C, respectively. These excellent temperature responses and thermo-switchable assessments were found to be efficient in delivering localised and controllable cell attachment/detachment without damage. Okano et al. [121] extended their work and published another highly cited two articles (ranked 7 and 10) in 2004 and in 2001, respectively. Both articles focused on temperature-responsive cell culture surfaces/plates with the latter article dedicated to functional cardiac myocyte tissues. This made the work of Okano and co-workers on the cell culture plate among the top cited research in the field of FPBMs prepared by RIGC, which were subsequently commercialised.
The third most-cited research article was written by Rogers and co-workers [204] and was published in Nature Materials with the highest IF (43.84) and C/Y (86.12) in 2013. This research article indicated that the synthesis of microscale temperature sensors was necessary for both precision evaluation and mapping characterisation in a non-invasive procedure onto the skin surface. This device and method offered precise measurement of the skin temperature as affected by skin hydration, mental and physical actions, and vasoconstriction/dilation.

3.7. The Top Influential Authors on Development of FPBMs Prepared by RIGC

Table 5 shows the top 10 leading authors who have contributed to FPBMs prepared by the RIGC. These authors’ main research areas primarily fall within chemistry and biomedical engineering, in addition to radiation chemistry and macromolecules. A total of 709 authors contributed to the research on FPBMs prepared by RIGC. Amongst the 10 top co-cited authors, T. Okano (4854 TC) had the highest rank, followed by M. Yamato (2855 TC), A. Kikuchi (2075 TC), E. Bucio (592 TC), and B. Gupta (365 TC). It can be noticed from the table that all three Japanese researchers have the highest TC. On the one hand, E. Bucio, with the highest number of publications (30), had only 592 TC. A. Kikuchi, with only seven publications, had prominently received a total of 2075 TC. On the other hand, T. Okano can be considered the most influential author in terms of both publication (20) and TC (4854). It can be noted that T. Okano has a longer history of publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC (1990–2018) compared to other authors such as H. Singh, who published his research articles in the period 1989–2008. Thus, he can be considered the most influential author in the area of FPBMs prepared by RIGC. Finally, it was interestingly found that the top 10 authors not only came from the same country but also had the same affiliations, suggesting that the key to success for such authors was working in a team in addition to the availability of funds and research facilities.
Results from the top 10 most prolific authors in the field of RIGC from 1985 to 2021 based on the dataset are presented in Figure 6, which shows the top 10 authors with high productivity over the years. These authors have shown consistency in their contributions to the research body in this field. The top authors were found to be more active in the period of 2009–2019 based on TP and the h-index, which is calculated by counting the number of publications for which an author has been cited by other authors at least that same number of times. B. Gupta (h-index: 12, TP: 12) was found to have the longest impact in this research area, followed by T. Okano (h-index: 19, TP: 20). B. Emilio (h-index: 16, TP: 30) has the highest number of publications in this research area, even though his first publication was in 2005. Both H. Alvarez-Loranzo (h-index: 11, TP: 16) and A. Concherio (h-index: 11, TP: 16) have co-authored several papers in this area since 2009.

3.8. The Most Influential Countries to Provide Funding for FPBMs Prepared by RIGC

The leading countries in providing funds for FPBMs prepared by RIGC are shown in Table 6. About 99% of the published articles are multi-authored, indicating the presence of collaboration among several research teams locally or internationally. The top 10 countries with 210 publications occupy 62.86% of the total fund records in FPBMs prepared by RIGC. The % of the total fund was calculated from the publications from 1985 to 2021 by dividing the number of funds of the country by the total funds of all countries multiplied by 100. For instance, the USA (37 TP, 15.7% of fund) and Japan (33 TP, 14.9% of fund) are leading the list in terms of citations and the number of publications. For Japan, this can be attributed to the pioneering studies by leading researchers such as T. Okano and the effective governmental plans on research funds for research institutes (e.g., to Tokyo Women Medical University, Center Excellence Century). As for the USA, such a high funding percentage reflects the presence of international collaboration networks, activities, and facilities driven by the collaboration with US institutions and companies. Concerning the ratio between TP and the country’s population, Portugal, with its small population, portrays a typical example of high research intensity in FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Several national and international research funds and grant programmes have been launched in many countries to focus on promoting interdisciplinary research and the approach towards international collaboration has improved both the quality of the research and inter-profession communication. The corresponding author’s country and the presence of authors from other countries show the preference for international cooperation by the respective corresponding authors. Particularly, the ratio of multiple country publications (MCP) to total publications for most of the top 16 countries is between 10–67%. Mexico (67%) and Spain (52%), which were found to have a strong collaboration as shown in Figure 7. Although the USA and Japan have more MCP than China, India, and the countries in the lower left group, they have a relatively low MCP to TP, standing at 24% and 21%, respectively. Other notable countries in terms of MCP to TP that have a low number of publications are the groups in the lower left corner, with values ranging from 25 to 50%. This indicates a higher preference and importance of the international collaboration for these countries for the research on FPBMs prepared by RIGC. Mapping the collaboration among various countries revealed the presence of 173 collaboration networks among 26 countries, of which Mexico (22), Spain (18), and the USA (18) have the highest numbers of collaboration networks.

3.9. Keywords Analysis

A more visualised representation of the top researchers, their countries, and specific areas of interest in the field of FPBMs prepared by RIGC is shown in Figure 8. The emphasis of the three-factor plot is placed on the height of each box and the thickness of the connecting lines to the taller boxes both indicate significance, and the thicker the correlation line, the more information or volume of the work can be obtained. From the country viewpoint, both Mexico (7) and Spain (7) have the highest numbers of the authors who eventually prevailed as the top three authors in this research area in terms of author’s affiliations. Surprisingly, all seven authors from Mexico and Spain have cross collaboration involving these two countries. India has five authors in the field of FPBMs prepared by RIGC led by B. Gupta. In terms of affiliations, Emilio Bucio (six) has the highest number of country affiliations followed by G. Burillo (four). The Japanese authors (four) are found to have affiliations with the USA. Authors from Mexico and Spain seem to be focusing on multi-level research as indicated by the diversity in research keywords. E. Bucio, C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, and A. Concheiro focused on 18 of the top 20 keywords, followed by G. Burillo and H. I. Melendez-Ortiz at 13. B. Gupta was found to be focused on 12 keywords, including polymerisation and chitosan, among others. Hydrogels (14), polymers (13), polymerisation (12), copolymerisation (11), chitosan (10), acrylic acid (10), membrane (10), N-isopropylacrylamide (nine), and radiation (eight) are the important keywords found in the three-factor plot among county–author keywords.
Keyword co-occurrence can effectively reflect the hotspots of research areas, allowing exploration of the research trends and providing decision-making directions. The keyword co-occurrence network of publications related to FPBMs prepared by RIGC was constructed from 235 articles. The nodes in the map represent the corresponding keywords and the node size represented the number of publications in the field of RIGC that include the keywords. The link lines between the nodes represent the relationships between the keywords. The 235 articles were mapped to create a thematic concentration for the similar keywords represented by the clusters. Figure 9 shows the co-occurrence of clustered keywords network of publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC. As can be seen, the co-occurrence of keywords knowledge map revealed keywords with higher centrality and occurrence counts and could be clustered into 15 main sub-clusters, including #0 Acrylic Acid, #1 Cell Sheet Engineering, #2 Composite Nanoparticle, #3 Synthesis Condition, #4 Critical Solution Temperature, #5 Non-Polar Film, #6 Antibacterial Surface, #7 Thermo-responsive, Polymer Nanocarrier, #9 Membrane Biosensor, #10 Gamma-Irradiation, #14 Moving Trend, #14 Bacterial Adhesion, #20 Biology, #22 Acrylonitrile Monomer, and #23 Polyethersulfone Nanofiltration Membrane.
Figure 10 presents a combined network visualisation and a density map of co-occurrence of the keywords related to the radiation-grafted FPBMs. Four interrelated groups can be observed. The size of the nodes represents the frequency of the keywords and the thickness of the links between two nodes represents the co-occurrence of the keywords. Although the networks are prepared based on the period 1985–2021, the evolution of these keywords can be found in Figure 10A. Moreover, the map in Figure 10B shows the density of the research keywords. Polymerisation, hydrogels, polymers, acrylic-acid, surface modification, and drug-delivery are among the heavy research areas.
Reference analysis is one of the most common types of analysis in the field of bibliometrics and a clustered network of co-cited references was further performed and could be shown by timeline visualisation. The modularity which is a multiplicative constant representing the number of edges falling within groups divided by the expected number in an equivalent network with edges placed at random. Values close to 1 indicate strong community structure. The network has modularity of 0.885, which suggests that the research on FPBMs prepared by RIGP is clearly defined considering co-citation clusters. The clusters are labelled by index terms selected from the citation frequencies are arranged vertically in descending order of cluster size, and the curves represent the co-citation links between clusters. The nodes with red tree rings or large sizes are references that required more attention because of their high citation number, citation bursts, or both [208].
Further analysis of the co-citation clusters of keywords in the period of 1985–2021 was performed using CiteSpace for the timeline overview prevailed that the duration varied considerably among clusters. After extracting from the landscape of the co-citation network in terms of cluster size, the major clusters with elevated levels of homogeneity are presented in Table 7. The first two columns present the cluster ID and their respective sizes. The “Silhouette” measures in the third column are of greater importance in the clustering of keywords as it indicates the matching between the publications within the cluster and clustering. The closer of the value of “Silhouette” to 1, the higher the homogeneity of the network. In general, these clusters present the main subdomains in FPBMs prepared by RIGP research and are closely related to each other. Some clusters may not be the larger ones, but they are the hottest in this research area. The cluster labelled as “Acrylic Acid” contains 133 publications across a 58-year period from 1962 to 2020. From the timeline, it can be deduced that the initial conceptualisation, development, and expansion of this cluster are going together with the bursts. Surprisingly, the longest surviving cluster in FPBMs prepared by RIGC is the Thermo-responsive Polymer Nanocarrier, which has a span of 18 years and is still active. This clearly shows that this cluster has a long-standing impact on the development of this research area. The cluster of Biology lasted for 16 years in this research area. Other major active clusters include Cell Sheet Engineering, Composite Nanoparticles, Antibacterial Surfaces, and Gamma-irradiation.

3.10. Limitation of Study

The restriction of the keywords to radiation grafted functional biopolymers *, OR bioactive surfaces *, OR medical *, OR biotechnological *, OR biomedical *, OR health care * in the titles and abstracts; the search results may not cover all the studies related to FPBMs prepared by RIGC. This is because some authors may not have mentioned the applications, neither in the title nor in the abstract. This is most likely because their studies were still at the preliminary or the fundamental stage. Another account in which the search of keywords may have not been covered is in the studies in which combined techniques, including RIGC and other living polymerisation methods, such as reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerisation, may have been used. This is most likely led to modified names representing the new hybrid techniques such as “radiation induced RAFT polymerization” or “RAFT mediated radiation graft polymerization” that could not be captured. Nevertheless, such studies are not many as compared to the mainstream using conventional RIGC.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

The last four decades have witnessed an intense concern in the synthesis of novel radiation-grafted polymers with bioactive surfaces for use in bio-driven applications. The present bibliometric analysis has delivered an overview of FPBMs prepared by RIGC publication trends based on 235 articles selected from the WoS. The study demonstrated that the number of publications related to these materials have been enhanced after 2002, with the lowest and highest numbers of publications being in 1999 and 2012, respectively. The scientometric findings revealed that the applications of FPBMs fall into four main categories, including medical, biomedical, biotechnological, and healthcare applications. Moreover, all applications were dominated by the drug carrier/release materials, which stand at 21.33%, followed by 12.0% for antimicrobial fabrics/films, 11.33% for surgical sutures, 8.67% for scaffolds/tissue engineering, 8% for antifouling membranes, 7.33% for cell culture plates, 6.67% for supports in enzyme immobilisation/release, 6% for catheters, 4.67% for implants, 4.67% for biosensors, 2.67% for packaging films, and 2% for antimicrobial face masks. The Radiation Physics and Chemistry journal is found to be the most dominant journal in publishing articles related to FPBMs prepared by RIGC and applications. Authors such as T. Okano, B. Gupta, H. Singh, H. Feil, and B. Emilio are found to be the most influential researchers in research and collaboration on the preparation and applications of radiation-grafted FPBMs. Countries such as the USA, Japan, and India are the most globally active hubs in research on FPBMs prepared by RIGC, as indicated by the level of international contributions and the sequence of the total funds of 15.7%, 14.9%, and 11.9%, respectively. This coincided with being the leading country in terms of the absolute number of publications and the highest citations.
The drop in publications that took place in the past several years is most likely caused by a combination of factors, such as a lack of funds and less involvement of researchers from universities. This is due to the captivity of irradiation facilities in industries or in radiation research institutes (i.e., facilities are dedicated to certain products/applications), which certainly led to limited access to such external researchers. This is coupled with the competition from other cheaper and well-established technologies of physical immobilisation of bioactive agents to polymer substrates. Nevertheless, several recommendations have been made in recent studies to promote the applications of radiation-grafted FPBMs, including the use of RIGC in the fabrication of more tuneable pH and thermo-responsive polymers for tissue engineering, drug delivery, and medical devices in addition to polymers for implants and antibacterial applications. Finally, it can be concluded that appropriate raising of research funds and establishing systematic collaborative research are required not only to use the RIGC method widely and effectively to design more sustainable, non-toxic, affordable, and timely-needed FPBMs products to advance medical, biomedical, biotechnological, and healthcare fields but also to promote such technology among new generations of young researchers and ultimately help to promote a healthier society in the coming years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.M.N. and H.A.E.E.; methodology, M.A.T., K.S. and R.R.A.; software, M.A.T. and K.S.; data curation, B.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Y.; writing—review and editing, M.M.N., B.G. and H.A.E.E.; visualisation, T.M.T.; supervision, M.M.N. and H.A.E.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) through COVID-19 Fund (2020) provided to the Malaysia Japan International Institute of Technology (MJIIT) with a cost center: S.K130000.0543.4Y261. This research was also funded by Institute of Bioproduct Development (IBD), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) under the industrial fund with cost centers: R.J130000.7609.4C463 and R.J130000.7609.4C465.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available by corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the Institute of Bioproduct Development (IBD), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reddy, M.; Ponnamma, D.; Choudhary, R.; Sadasivuni, K.K. A comparative review of natural and synthetic biopolymer composite scaffolds. Polymers 2021, 13, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liang, Y.; Li, L.; Scott, R.A.; Kiick, K.L. 50th anniversary perspective: Polymeric biomaterials: Diverse functions enabled by advances in macromolecular chemistry. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 483–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Osorio-Delgado, M.A.; Henao-Tamayo, L.J.; Velásquez-Cock, J.A.; Cañas-Gutierrez, A.I.; Restrepo-Múnera, L.M.; Gañán-Rojo, P.F.; Zuluaga-Gallego, R.O.; Ortiz-Trujillo, I.C.; Castro-Herazo, C.I. Biomedical applications of polymeric biomaterials. Dyna 2017, 84, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Neděla, O.; Slepička, P.; Švorčík, V. Surface modification of polymer substrates for biomedical applications. Materials 2017, 10, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nasef, M.M.; Hegazy, E.S.A. Preparation and applications of ion exchange membranes by radiation-induced graft copolymerization of polar monomers onto non-polar films. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 499–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pino-Ramos, V.H.; Ramos-Ballesteros, A.; López-Saucedo, F.; López-Barriguete, J.E.; Varca, G.H.; Bucio, E. Radiation grafting for the functionalization and development of smart polymeric materials. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 374, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Small, M.; Faglie, A.; Craig, A.J.; Pieper, M.; Fernand Narcisse, V.E.; Neuenschwander, P.F.; Chou, S.-F. Nanostructure-enabled and macromolecule-grafted surfaces for biomedical applications. Micromachines 2018, 9, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ashfaq, A.; Clochard, M.-C.; Coqueret, X.; Dispenza, C.; Driscoll, M.S.; Ulański, P.; Al-Sheikhly, M. Polymerization reactions and modifications of polymers by ionizing radiation. Polymers 2020, 12, 2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nasef, M.M. Radiation-grafted membranes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Current trends and future directions. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 12278–12329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nasef, M.M.; Gürsel, S.A.; Karabelli, D.; Güven, O. Radiation-grafted materials for energy conversion and energy storage applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 63, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nasef, M.M.; Gupta, B.; Shameli, K.; Verma, C.; Ali, R.R.; Ting, T.M. Engineered Bioactive Polymeric Surfaces by Radiation Induced Graft Copolymerization: Strategies and Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ishigaki, I.; Sugo, T.; Senoo, K.; Okada, T.; Okamoto, J.; Machi, S. Graft polymerization of acrylic acid onto polyethylene film by preirradiation method. I. Effects of preirradiation dose, monomer concentration, reaction temperature, and film thickness. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1982, 27, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Makuuchi, K.; Cheng, S. Radiation Processing of Polymer Materials and Its Industrial Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuan, J.; Yu, C.; Peng, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, J.; Qiu, J.; Li, J.; Zhai, M. Facile synthesis of amphoteric ion exchange membrane by radiation grafting of sodium styrene sulfonate and N, N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate for vanadium redox flow battery. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 5194–5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rajabalizadeh Mojarrad, N.; Sadeghi, S.; Yarar Kaplan, B.m.; Güler, E.; Alkan Gürsel, S. Metal-Salt Enhanced Grafting of Vinylpyridine and Vinylimidazole Monomer Combinations in Radiation Grafted Membranes for High-Temperature PEM Fuel Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 3, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lim, K.L.; Wong, C.Y.; Wong, W.Y.; Loh, K.S.; Selambakkannu, S.; Othman, N.A.F.; Yang, H. Radiation-Grafted Anion-Exchange Membrane for Fuel Cell and Electrolyzer Applications: A Mini Review. Membranes 2021, 11, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hoshina, H.; Kasai, N.; Amada, H.; Takahashi, M.; Tanaka, K.; Seko, N. Recovery of scandium from hot spring water with graft adsorbent containing phosphoric groups. J. Ion Exch. 2014, 25, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hanh, T.T.; Huy, H.T.; Hien, N.Q. Pre-irradiation grafting of acrylonitrile onto chitin for adsorption of arsenic in water. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2015, 106, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, Q.; Hu, J.; Li, R.; Xing, Z.; Xu, L.; Wang, M.; Guo, X.; Wu, G. Radiation synthesis of a new amidoximated UHMWPE fibrous adsorbent with high adsorption selectivity for uranium over vanadium in simulated seawater. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 122, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sawada, S.-i.; Maekawa, Y. Radiation-Induced Asymmetric Grafting of Different Monomers into Base Films to Prepare Novel Bipolar Membranes. Molecules 2021, 26, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ishihara, R.; Asai, S.; Saito, K. Recent Progress in Charged Polymer Chains Grafted by Radiation-Induced Graft Polymerization; Adsorption of Proteins and Immobilization of Inorganic Precipitates. Quantum Beam Sci. 2020, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jaganathan, S.K.; Balaji, A.; Vellayappan, M.V.; Subramanian, A.P.; John, A.A.; Asokan, M.K.; Supriyanto, E. Radiation-induced surface modification of polymers for biomaterial application. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 2007–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chapiro, A. Radiation Chemistry of Polymer System; Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  24. Charlsby, A. Atomic Radiation and Polymers; Pergamon Press: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nasef, M.M.; Güven, O. Radiation-grafted copolymers for separation and purification purposes: Status, challenges and future directions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1597–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wen, D.; Peng, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhai, M. Recent Progress in Environmental Applications of Functional Adsorbent Prepared by Radiation techniques: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 424, 126887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gubler, L.; Scherer, G.G. Trends for fuel cell membrane development. Desalination 2010, 250, 1034–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hoffman, A.S.; Stayton, P.S.; Bulmus, V.; Chen, G.; Chen, J.; Cheung, C.; Chilkoti, A.; Ding, Z.; Dong, L.; Fong, R. Really smart bioconjugates of smart polymers and receptor proteins. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gil, E.S.; Hudson, S.M. Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 1173–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hoffman, A.S. Conventional and environmentally-sensitive hydrogels for medical and industrial uses: A review paper. In Polymer Gels; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; pp. 289–297. [Google Scholar]
  31. Carenza, M. Recent achievements in the use of radiation polymerization and grafting for biomedical applications. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part C Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1992, 39, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ulanski, P.; Janik, I.; Kadlubowski, S.; Kozicki, M.; Kujawa, P.; Pietrzak, M.; Stasica, P.; Rosiak, J.M. Polymeric biomaterials synthesized by radiation techniques–current studies at IARC, Poland. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2002, 13, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rosiak, J.; Janik, I.; Kadlubowski, S.; Kozicki, M.; Kujawa, P.; Stasica, P.; Ulanski, P. Nano-, micro-and macroscopic hydrogels synthesized by radiation technique. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2003, 208, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Fu, W.; Yao, M.; Ding, Z.; Xuan, J.; Li, D.; Wang, S.; Xia, Y.; Cao, M. Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-based thermoresponsive composite hydrogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wach, R.A.; Rosiak, J.M.; Ulański, P. Polysaccharides hydrogel-radiation induced formation and medical applications. In Proceedings of the 26th Biomaterials in Medicine and Veterinary Medicine Conference, Rytro, Poland, 12–15 October 2017; Volume 20. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang, J.; Yamato, M.; Kohno, C.; Nishimoto, A.; Sekine, H.; Fukai, F.; Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering: Recreating tissues without biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 6415–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Yamato, M.; Akiyama, Y.; Kobayashi, J.; Yang, J.; Kikuchi, A.; Okano, T. Temperature-responsive cell culture surfaces for regenerative medicine with cell sheet engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1123–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Teles, M.N.O.; Santos, B.L.P.; Silva, D.P.; Teixeira, J.A.; Ruzene, D.S. A bibliometric description of lignin applicability for the removal of chemical pollutants in effluents. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sweileh, W.M. Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on antimicrobial stewardship from 1990 to 2019. Glob. Health 2021, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Almeida, F.L.C.; Castro, M.P.J.; Travália, B.M.; Forte, M.B.S. Trends in lipase immobilization: Bibliometric review and patent analysis. Process Biochem. 2021, 110, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salgado-Cruz, M.d.l.P.; Salgado-Cruz, J.; García-Hernández, A.B.; Calderón-Domínguez, G.; Gómez-Viquez, H.; Oliver-Espinoza, R.; Fernández-Martínez, M.C.; Yáñez-Fernández, J. Chitosan as a Coating for Biocontrol in Postharvest Products: A Bibliometric Review. Membranes 2021, 11, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghule, B.; Laad, M. A Bibliometric Survey on Polymer Composites in Energy Storage Applications. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2020, 1–17. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8500&context=libphilprac (accessed on 6 November 2022).
  43. Khan, A.S.; Ur Rehman, S.; AlMaimouni, Y.K.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, M.; Ashiq, M. Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published on Antibacterial Dental Adhesive from 1996–2020. Polymers 2020, 12, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Simmons, P.; McElroy, T.; Allen, A.R. A bibliometric review of artificial extracellular matrices based on tissue engineering technology literature: 1990 through 2019. Materials 2020, 13, 2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abejón, R.; Pérez-Acebo, H.; Garea, A. A bibliometric analysis of research on supported ionic liquid membranes during the 1995–2015 period: Study of the main applications and trending topics. Membranes 2017, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gonçalves, M.C.P.; Kieckbusch, T.G.; Perna, R.F.; Fujimoto, J.T.; Morales, S.A.V.; Romanelli, J.P. Trends on enzyme immobilization researches based on bibliometric analysis. Process Biochem. 2019, 76, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 285–320. [Google Scholar]
  48. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeong, S.I.; Park, S.-C.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, E.-J.; Heo, H.; Park, J.-S.; Gwon, H.-J.; Lim, Y.-M.; Jang, M.-K. One-step synthesis of gene carrier via gamma irradiation and its application in tumor gene therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Turmanova, S.; Trifonov, A.; Kalaijiev, O.; Kostov, G. Radiation grafting of acrylic acid onto polytetrafluoroethylene films for glucose oxidase immobilization and its application in membrane biosensor. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 127, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pino-Ramos, V.; Meléndez-Ortiz, H.; Ramos-Ballesteros, A.; Bucio, E. Radiation Grafting of Biopolymers and Synthetic Polymers. In Biopolymer Grafting: Applications; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Bucio, E.; Burillo, G.; Concheiro, A. Medical devices modified at the surface by γ-ray grafting for drug loading and delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2010, 7, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Singh, B.; Kumar, A. Radiation-induced graft copolymerization of N-vinyl imidazole onto moringa gum polysaccharide for making hydrogels for biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. García-Vargas, M.; González-Chomón, C.; Magariños, B.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Bucio, E. Acrylic polymer-grafted polypropylene sutures for covalent immobilization or reversible adsorption of vancomycin. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 461, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tang, Z.; Akiyama, Y.; Okano, T. Recent development of temperature-responsive cell culture surface using poly (N-isopropylacrylamide). J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2014, 52, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pasparakis, G.; Tsitsilianis, C. LCST polymers: Thermoresponsive nanostructured assemblies towards bioapplications. Polymer 2020, 211, 123146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jabbari, E.; Nozari, S. Swelling behavior of acrylic acid hydrogels prepared by γ-radiation crosslinking of polyacrylic acid in aqueous solution. Eur. Polym. J. 2000, 36, 2685–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Costoya, A.; Becerra, L.E.V.; Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; Díaz-Gómez, L.; Mayer, C.; Otero, A.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Immobilization of antimicrobial and anti-quorum sensing enzymes onto GMA-grafted poly (vinyl chloride) catheters. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 558, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zuñiga-Zamorano, I.; Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; Costoya, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Poly (vinyl chloride) catheters modified with pH-responsive poly (methacrylic acid) with affinity for antimicrobial agents. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 142, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hidzir, N.M.; Radzali, N.A.M.; Rahman, I.A.; Shamsudin, S.A. Gamma irradiation-induced grafting of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) onto ePTFE for implant applications. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020, 52, 2320–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hiriart-Ramírez, E.; Contreras-García, A.; Garcia-Fernandez, M.J.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Bucio, E. Radiation grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto cotton gauzes for functionalization with cyclodextrins and elution of antimicrobial agents. Cellulose 2012, 19, 2165–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Muñoz-Bonilla, A.; Fernández-García, M. Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 281–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Aoki, S.; Fujiwara, K.; Sugo, T.; Suzuki, K. Antimicrobial fabric adsorbed iodine produced by radiation-induced graft polymerization. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 84, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Riquet, A.-M.; Delattre, J.; Vitrac, O.; Guinault, A. Design of modified plastic surfaces for antimicrobial applications: Impact of ionizing radiation on the physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 91, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ping, X.; Wang, M.; Xuewu, G. Surface modification of poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET) film by gamma-ray induced grafting of poly (acrylic acid) and its application in antibacterial hybrid film. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lim, S.J.; Shin, I.H. Graft copolymerization of GMA and EDMA on PVDF to hydrophilic surface modification by electron beam irradiation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020, 52, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stasica, P.; Rosiak, J.; Ciach, M.; Radek, M. Approach to construct hydrogel intervertebral disc implants—Experimental and numerical investigations. Eng. Biomater. 2000, 3, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yoshii, F.; Makuuchi, K.; Sudradjat, A.; Darwis, D.; Razzak, M. Heat stability of radiation crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. Ika Kikaigaku 1992, 62, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Darwis, D.; Stasica, P.; Razzak, M.T.; Rosiak, J.M. Characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel for prosthetic intervertebral disc nucleus. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2002, 63, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lee, S.-H.; An, S.-J.; Lim, Y.-M.; Huh, J.-B. The efficacy of electron beam irradiated bacterial cellulose membranes as compared with collagen membranes on guided bone regeneration in peri-implant bone defects. Materials 2017, 10, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Hidzir, N.M.; Hill, D.J.; Martin, D.; Grøndahl, L. Radiation-induced grafting of acrylic acid onto expanded poly (tetrafluoroethylene) membranes. Polymer 2012, 53, 6063–6071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Magaña, H.; Becerra, C.D.; Serrano-Medina, A.; Palomino, K.; Palomino-Vizcaíno, G.; Olivas-Sarabia, A.; Bucio, E.; Cornejo-Bravo, J.M. Radiation Grafting of a Polymeric Prodrug onto Silicone Rubber for Potential Medical/Surgical Procedures. Polymers 2020, 12, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kyomoto, M.; Moro, T.; Saiga, K.; Hashimoto, M.; Ito, H.; Kawaguchi, H.; Takatori, Y.; Ishihara, K. Biomimetic hydration lubrication with various polyelectrolyte layers on cross-linked polyethylene orthopedic bearing materials. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 4451–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Moro, T.; Kawaguchi, H.; Ishihara, K.; Kyomoto, M.; Karita, T.; Ito, H.; Nakamura, K.; Takatori, Y. Wear resistance of artificial hip joints with poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) grafted polyethylene: Comparisons with the effect of polyethylene cross-linking and ceramic femoral heads. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2995–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Jimenez-Paez, V.M.; Bucio, E. Modification of medical grade PVC with N-vinylimidazole to obtain bactericidal surface. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 119, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Burillo, G.; Magariños, B.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Radiation-grafting of N-vinylimidazole onto silicone rubber for antimicrobial properties. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2015, 110, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Valencia-Mora, R.A.; Zavala-Lagunes, E.; Bucio, E. Grafting of thermo-sensitive N-vinylcaprolactam onto silicone rubber through the direct radiation method. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 124, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Razzak, M.T.; Otsuhata, K.; Tabata, Y.; Ohashi, F.; Takeuchi, A. Modification of natural rubber tubes for biomaterials. II. Radiation-induced grafting of N, N-dimethylaminoethylacrylate (DMAEA) onto natural rubber (NR) tubes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1989, 38, 829–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Razzak, M.T.; Otsuhata, K.; Tabata, Y.; Ohashi, F.; Takeuchi, A. Modification of natural rubber tubes for biomaterials I. Radiation-induced grafting of N, N-dimethyl acrylamide onto natural rubber tubes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1988, 36, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nowatzki, P.J.; Koepsel, R.R.; Stoodley, P.; Min, K.; Harper, A.; Murata, H.; Donfack, J.; Hortelano, E.R.; Ehrlich, G.D.; Russell, A.J. Salicylic acid-releasing polyurethane acrylate polymers as anti-biofilm urological catheter coatings. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1869–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hosny, A.E.-D.M.; Farrag, H.A.; Helmy, O.M.; Hagras, S.A.; El-Hag Ali, A. In-vitro evaluation of antibacterial and antibiofilm efficiency of radiation-modified polyurethane–ZnO nanocomposite to be used as a self-disinfecting catheter. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2020, 13, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Mukherjee, A.; Gupta, B. Radiation-induced graft copolymerization of methacrylic acid onto polypropylene fibers. I. Effect of synthesis conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1985, 30, 2643–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Singh, H.; Tyagi, P. Radiation induced grafting of methacrylic acid onto silk for the immobilization of antimicrobial drug for sustained delivery. Die Angew. Makromol. Chem. Appl. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1989, 172, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tyagi, P.; Gupta, B.; Singh, H. Radiation-induced grafting of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate onto polypropylene for biomedical applications. II. Evaluation as antimicrobial suture. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 1993, 30, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Plessier, C.; Gupta, B.; Chapiro, A. Modification of polypropylene fiber by radiation-induced graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile monomer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 1343–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gupta, B.; Anjum, N.; Gulrez, S.; Singh, H. Development of antimicrobial polypropylene sutures by graft copolymerization. II. Evaluation of physical properties, drug release, and antimicrobial activity. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103, 3534–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yuan, F.; Wei, J.; Tang, E.-Q.; Zhao, K.-Y.; Xue, Y. Synthesis and Modification of Polypropylene by Radiation-induced Grafting. Int. J. Chem. 2009, 1, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. López-Saucedo, F.; Flores-Rojas, G.G.; López-Saucedo, J.; Magariños, B.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Antimicrobial silver-loaded polypropylene sutures modified by radiation-grafting. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 100, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. López-Saucedo, F.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Radiation-grafting of vinyl monomers separately onto polypropylene monofilament sutures. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 132, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Marisol Arteaga-Luna, M.; Hugo Pino-Ramos, V.; Magaña, H.; Bucio, E. Polymeric pro-drug sutures for potential local release of salicylic acid. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2018, 67, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. López-Saucedo, F.; Flores-Rojas, G.; Bucio, E.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; González-Antonio, O. Achieving antimicrobial activity through poly (N-methylvinylimidazolium) iodide brushes on binary-grafted polypropylene suture threads. MRS Communications 2017, 7, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tummalapalli, M.; Anjum, S.; Kumari, S.; Gupta, B. Antimicrobial surgical sutures: Recent developments and strategies. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 607–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Buchenska, J.; Slomkowski, S.; Tazbir, J.; Sobolewska, E. Antibacterial poly (ethylene terephthalate) yarn containing cephalosporin type antibiotic. Fibres Text. East. Eur. 2003, 11, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  94. Anjum, N.; Gulrez, S.; Singh, H.; Gupta, B. Development of antimicrobial polypropylene sutures by graft polymerization. I. Influence of grafting conditions and characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 3895–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gupta, B.; Jain, R.; Anjum, N.; Singh, H. Preirradiation grafting of acrylonitrile onto polypropylene monofilament for biomedical applications: I. Influence of synthesis conditions. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2006, 75, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gupta, B.; Jain, R.; Singh, H. Preparation of antimicrobial sutures by preirradiation grafting onto polypropylene monofilament. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008, 19, 1698–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gupta, B.; Jain, R.; Anjum, N.; Singh, H. Preparation of antimicrobial sutures by preirradiation grafting of acrylonitrile onto polypropylene monofilament. III. Hydrolysis of the grafted suture. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 94, 2509–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jain, R.; Gupta, B.; Anjum, N.; Revagade, N.; Singh, H. Preparation of antimicrobial sutures by preirradiation grafting of acrylonitrile onto polypropylene monofilament. II. mechanical, physical, and thermal characteristics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 93, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, M.; Bao, B.; Yoshii, F.; Makuuchi, K. Irradiation of crosslinked, poly (vinyl alcohol) blended hydrogel for wound dressing. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2001, 250, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhao, L.; Mitomo, H.; Zhai, M.; Yoshii, F.; Nagasawa, N.; Kume, T. Synthesis of antibacterial PVA/CM-chitosan blend hydrogels with electron beam irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 53, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yang, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X.; Yu, F.; Zhu, Z. Investigation of PVA/ws-chitosan hydrogels prepared by combined γ-irradiation and freeze-thawing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 73, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Abou Taleb, M.F.; Ismail, S.A.; El-Kelesh, N.A. Radiation synthesis and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol/methacrylic acid–gelatin hydrogel for vitro drug delivery. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2008, 46, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kaur, I.; Bhati, P.; Sharma, S. Radiation induced synthesis of (gelatin-co-PVA)-g-poly (AAc) copolymer as wound dressing material. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 3, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Razzak, M.T.; Darwis, D. Irradiation of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone blended hydrogel for wound dressing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2001, 62, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Casimiro, M.; Gil, M.; Leal, J. Suitability of gamma irradiated chitosan based membranes as matrix in drug release system. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 395, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Cabane, E.; Zhang, X.; Langowska, K.; Palivan, C.G.; Meier, W. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications in nanomedicine. Biointerphases 2012, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Stuart, M.A.C.; Huck, W.T.; Genzer, J.; Müller, M.; Ober, C.; Stamm, M.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Szleifer, I.; Tsukruk, V.V.; Urban, M. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Meléndez-Ortiz, I.H.; Bucio, E. Stimuli-sensitive behaviour of binary graft Co-polymers (PP-g-DMAEMA)-g-NIPAAm and (PP-g-4VP)-g-NIPAAm in acidic and basic medium. Des. Monomers Polym. 2009, 12, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Luk, J.Z.; Cooper-White, J.; Rintoul, L.; Taran, E.; Grøndahl, L. Functionalised polycaprolactone films and 3D scaffolds via gamma irradiation-induced grafting. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 4171–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Rahman, M.; Sreearunothai, P.; Opaprakasit, P. Development and Characterization of Photoinduced Acrylamide-Grafted Polylactide Films for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2017, 2017, 5651398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Casimiro, M.H.; Gomes, S.R.; Rodrigues, G.; Leal, J.P.; Ferreira, L.M. Chitosan/Poly (vinylpyrrolidone) matrices obtained by gamma-irradiation for skin scaffolds: Characterization and preliminary cell response studies. Materials 2018, 11, 2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Casimiro, M.H.; Lancastre, J.J.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Gomes, S.R.; Rodrigues, G.; Ferreira, L.M. Chitosan-Based matrices prepared by gamma irradiation for tissue regeneration: Structural properties vs. preparation method. In Applications of Radiation Chemistry in the Fields of Industry, Biotechnology and Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 121–145. [Google Scholar]
  113. Tang, Z.; Akiyama, Y.; Okano, T. Temperature-responsive polymer modified surface for cell sheet engineering. Polymers 2012, 4, 1478–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Elloumi-Hannachi, I.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering: A unique nanotechnology for scaffold-free tissue reconstruction with clinical applications in regenerative medicine. J. Intern. Med. 2010, 267, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Takahashi, H.; Nakayama, M.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Controlled chain length and graft density of thermoresponsive polymer brushes for optimizing cell sheet harvest. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Haraguchi, Y.; Shimizu, T.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Scaffold-free tissue engineering using cell sheet technology. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 2184–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Riquet, A.; Rohman, G.; Guinault, A.; Demilly, M. Surface modification of polypropylene by radiation grafting of hydrophilic monomers: Physicochemical properties. Surf. Eng. 2011, 27, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yamada, N.; Okano, T.; Sakai, H.; Karikusa, F.; Sawasaki, Y.; Sakurai, Y. Thermo-responsive polymeric surfaces; control of attachment and detachment of cultured cells. Die Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1990, 11, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shimizu, T.; Yamato, M.; Kikuchi, A.; Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering for myocardial tissue reconstruction. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 2309–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Akiyama, Y.; Kikuchi, A.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Ultrathin poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) grafted layer on polystyrene surfaces for cell adhesion/detachment control. Langmuir 2004, 20, 5506–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Nishida, K.; Yamato, M.; Hayashida, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Maeda, N.; Watanabe, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagai, S.; Kikuchi, A.; Tano, Y. Functional bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface. Transplantation 2004, 77, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Fukumori, K.; Akiyama, Y.; Yamato, M.; Kobayashi, J.; Sakai, K.; Okano, T. Temperature-responsive glass coverslips with an ultrathin poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) layer. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Akiyama, Y.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Preparation of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) grafted polydimethylsiloxane by using electron beam irradiation. J. Robot. Mechatron. 2013, 25, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kumar, P.A.; Sreenivasan, K.; Kumary, T. Alternate method for grafting thermoresponsive polymer for transferring in vitro cell sheet structures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 2245–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. von Recum, H.; Okano, T.; Kim, S.W. Growth factor release from thermally reversible tissue culture substrates. J. Control. Release 1998, 55, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Shimizu, T.; Yamato, M.; Kikuchi, A.; Okano, T. Two-dimensional manipulation of cardiac myocyte sheets utilizing temperature-responsive culture dishes augments the pulsatile amplitude. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kobayashi, J.; Okano, T. Fabrication of a thermoresponsive cell culture dish: A key technology for cell sheet tissue engineering. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2010, 11, 014111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Muñoz-Muñoz, F.; Ruiz, J.-C.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Novel interpenetrating smart polymer networks grafted onto polypropylene by gamma radiation for loading and delivery of vancomycin. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 1859–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sponchioni, M.; Palmiero, U.C.; Moscatelli, D. Thermo-responsive polymers: Applications of smart materials in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 589–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Gandhi, A.; Paul, A.; Sen, S.O.; Sen, K.K. Studies on thermoresponsive polymers: Phase behaviour, drug delivery and biomedical applications. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Demirdirek, B.; Uhrich, K.E. Novel salicylic acid-based chemically crosslinked pH-sensitive hydrogels as potential drug delivery systems. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 528, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Vázquez-González, B.; Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; Díaz-Gómez, L.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Silicone rubber modified with methacrylic acid to host antiseptic drugs. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2014, 299, 1240–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kayal, S. Thermoresponsive magnetic/polymer composite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 41, 1116–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mutalik, S.; Suthar, N.A.; Managuli, R.S.; Shetty, P.K.; Avadhani, K.; Kalthur, G.; Kulkarni, R.V.; Thomas, R. Development and performance evaluation of novel nanoparticles of a grafted copolymer loaded with curcumin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Magaña, H.; Palomino, K.; Cornejo-Bravo, J.M.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Radiation-grafting of acrylamide onto silicone rubber films for diclofenac delivery. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2015, 107, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Melendez-Ortiz, H.I.; Díaz-Rodríguez, P.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Binary graft modification of polypropylene for anti-inflammatory drug–device combo products. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 103, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. De Oliveira, M.; Parra, D.; Amato, V.; Lugão, A. Hydrogel membranes of PVAl/clay by gamma radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 84, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gagliardi, M. In vitro haematic proteins adsorption and cytocompatibility study on acrylic copolymer to realise coatings for drug-eluting stents. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012, 32, 2445–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Burillo, G.; Bucio, E.; Arenas, E.; Lopez, G.P. Temperature and pH-sensitive swelling behavior of binary DMAEMA/4VP grafts on poly (propylene) films. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2007, 292, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bucio, E.; Burillo, G. Radiation grafting of pH and thermosensitive N-isopropylacrylamide and acrylic acid onto PTFE films by two-steps process. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2007, 76, 1724–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Stoica-Guzun, A.; Stroescu, M.; Tache, F.; Zaharescu, T.; Grosu, E. Effect of electron beam irradiation on bacterial cellulose membranes used as transdermal drug delivery systems. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2007, 265, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Casimiro, M.; Gil, M.; Leal, J. Drug release assays from new chitosan/pHEMA membranes obtained by gamma irradiation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2007, 265, 406–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Ramírez-Fuentes, Y.S.; Bucio, E.; Burillo, G. Radiation-induced grafting of N-isopropylacrylamide and acrylic acid onto polypropylene films by two step method. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2007, 265, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ikram, S.; Kumari, M.; Gupta, B. Thermosensitive membranes by radiation-induced graft polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide/acrylic acid on polypropylene nonwoven fabric. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Contreras-García, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Taboada, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Stimuli–responsive networks grafted onto polypropylene for the sustained delivery of NSAIDs. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 996–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Piao, M.-H.; Yang, D.-S.; Yoon, K.-R.; Lee, S.-H.; Choi, S.-H. Development of an electrogenerated chemiluminescence biosensor using carboxylic acid-functionalized MWCNT and Au nanoparticles. Sensors 2009, 9, 1662–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Yang, J.-H.; Lee, J.-C.; Choi, S.-H. Tyrosinase-immobilized biosensor based on the functionalized hydroxyl group-MWNT and detection of phenolic compounds in red wines. J. Sens. 2009, 2009, 916515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Yang, D.-S.; Jung, D.-J.; Choi, S.-H. One-step functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes by radiation-induced graft polymerization and their application as enzyme-free biosensors. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2010, 79, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kim, S.-K.; Kwen, H.-D.; Choi, S.-H. Fabrication of a microbial biosensor based on QD-MWNT supports by a one-step radiation reaction and detection of phenolic compounds in red wines. Sensors 2011, 11, 2001–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Kim, K.-I.; Kang, H.-Y.; Lee, J.-C.; Choi, S.-H. Fabrication of a multi-walled nanotube (MWNT) ionic liquid electrode and its application for sensing phenolics in red wines. Sensors 2009, 9, 6701–6714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Lee, Y.-J.; Chung, D.-J.; Oh, S.-H.; Choi, S.-H. Introduction of bifunctional group onto MWNT by radiation-induced graft polymerization and its use as biosensor-supporting materials. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 127613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Feil, H.; Bae, Y.H.; Feijen, J.; Kim, S.W. Effect of comonomer hydrophilicity and ionization on the lower critical solution temperature of N-isopropylacrylamide copolymers. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 2496–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pino-Ramos, V.H.; Flores-Rojas, G.G.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Bucio, E. Graft copolymerization by ionization radiation, characterization, and enzymatic activity of temperature-responsive SR-g-PNVCL loaded with lysozyme. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 126, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Abd Halin, N.I.; Al-Khatib, M.F.R.; Salleh, H.M.; Nasef, M.M. Preparation and Candida rugosa Lipase Immobilization on Nylon-6 Grafted and Aminated (Polyvinyl Benzyl Chloride) Microfibers. Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 2019, 14, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Alkhatib, M.; Bahrudin, N.A.; SALLEH, H.M.; Nasef, M.M.; Ting, T.M. Lipase immobilization on fibers grafted with polyglycidyl methachrylate. IIUM Eng. J. 2019, 20, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kamal, H.; Sabry, G.M.; Lotfy, S.; Abdallah, N.M.; Rosiak, J.; Hegazy, E.s.A. Immobilization of glucoamylase on polypropylene fibers modified by radiation induced graft copolymerization. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 45, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Garnett, J.; Jankiewicz, S.; Levot, R.; Sangster, D. Insolubilisation of biologically active materials with novel radiation graft copolymers. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1985, 25, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Dong, L.C.; Hoffman, A.S. Thermally reversible hydrogels: III. Immobilization of enzymes for feedback reaction control. J. Control. Release 1986, 4, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dong, L.C.; Hoffman, A.S. A new method for immobilization of biomolecules using preirradiation grafting at low temperature. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part C. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1986, 28, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hongfei, H.; Guanghui, W.; Jilan, W. Immobilization of peroxidase on SPEU film via radiation grafting. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part C. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1988, 31, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Schmidt, M.; Prager, A.; Schönherr, N.; Gläser, R.; Schulze, A. Reagent-free immobilization of industrial lipases to develop lipolytic membranes with self-cleaning surfaces. Membranes 2022, 12, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Xu, C.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, D.; Chen, S.; Huang, H. Graft copolymerization of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone onto pre-irradiated poly (vinylidene fluoride) powder. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Qin, Q.; Hou, Z.; Lu, X.; Bian, X.; Chen, L.; Shen, L.; Wang, S. Microfiltration membranes prepared from poly (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) grafted poly (vinylidene fluoride) synthesized by simultaneous irradiation. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 427, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Shen, L.; Feng, S.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Li, F.; Lin, H.; Yu, G. Surface modification of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane via radiation grafting: Novel mechanisms underlying the interesting enhanced membrane performance. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Xi, Z.-Y.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Zhu, L.-P.; Zhu, B.-K. Modification of polytetrafluoroethylene porous membranes by electron beam initiated surface grafting of binary monomers. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 339, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Deng, B.; Yang, X.; Xie, L.; Li, J.; Hou, Z.; Yao, S.; Liang, G.; Sheng, K.; Huang, Q. Microfiltration membranes with pH dependent property prepared from poly (methacrylic acid) grafted polyethersulfone powder. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Deng, B.; Li, J.; Hou, Z.; Yao, S.; Shi, L.; Liang, G.; Sheng, K. Microfiltration membranes prepared from polyethersulfone powder grafted with acrylic acid by simultaneous irradiation and their pH dependence. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2008, 77, 898–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mok, S.; Worsfold, D.; Fouda, A.; Matsuura, T. Surface modification of polyethersulfone hollow-fiber membranes by γ-ray irradiation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1994, 51, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Van der Bruggen, B. Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Schmidt, M.; Zahn, S.; Gehlhaar, F.; Prager, A.; Griebel, J.; Kahnt, A.; Knolle, W.; Konieczny, R.; Gläser, R.; Schulze, A. Radiation-Induced Graft Immobilization (RIGI): Covalent Binding of Non-Vinyl Compounds on Polymer Membranes. Polymers 2021, 13, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Adem, E.; Avalos-Borja, M.; Bucio, E.; Burillo, G.; Castillon, F.; Cota, L. Surface characterization of binary grafting of AAc/NIPAAm onto poly (tetrafluoroethylene)(PTFE). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2005, 234, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Casimiro, M.; Leal, J.; Gil, M. Characterisation of gamma irradiated chitosan/pHEMA membranes for biomedical purposes. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2005, 236, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. He, C.; Gu, Z. Studies on acrylic acid–grafted polyester fabrics by electron beam preirradiation method. I. Effects of process parameters on graft ratio and characterization of grafting products. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 3931–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Park, J.S.; Kim, J.H.; Nho, Y.C.; Kwon, O.H. Antibacterial activities of acrylic acid-grafted polypropylene fabric and its metallic salt. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 2213–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hassan, M.S.; Ibrahim, H.M. Characterization and antimicrobial properties of metal complexes of polypropylene fibers grafted with acrylic acid using gamma irradiation. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Montoya-Villegas, K.A.; Ramírez-Jiménez, A.; Licea-Claverie, Á.; Pérez-Sicairos, S.; Bucio, E.; Bernáldez-Sarabia, J.; Licea-Navarro, A.F. Surface Modification of Polyester-Fabric with Hydrogels and Silver Nanoparticles: Photochemical Versus Gamma Irradiation Methods. Materials 2019, 12, 3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Kumar, V.; Bhardwaj, Y.; Rawat, K.; Sabharwal, S. Radiation-induced grafting of vinylbenzyltrimethylammonium chloride (VBT) onto cotton fabric and study of its anti-bacterial activities. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2005, 73, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Flores-Rojas, G.; López-Saucedo, F.; Vázquez, E.; Hernández-Mecinas, E.; Huerta, L.; Cedillo, G.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Bucio, E. Synthesis of polyamide-6@ cellulose microfilms grafted with N-vinylcaprolactam using gamma-rays and loading of antimicrobial drugs. Cellulose 2020, 27, 2785–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Huang, K.-S.; Yang, C.-H.; Huang, S.-L.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lu, Y.-Y.; Lin, Y.-S. Recent advances in antimicrobial polymers: A mini-review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  180. Morais, D.S.; Guedes, R.M.; Lopes, M.A. Antimicrobial approaches for textiles: From research to market. Materials 2016, 9, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Seino, S.; Imoto, Y.; Kitagawa, D.; Kubo, Y.; Kosaka, T.; Kojima, T.; Nitani, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Yamamoto, T.A. Radiochemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles onto textile fabrics and their antibacterial activity. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ferraz, C.C.; Varca, G.H.; Ruiz, J.-C.; Lopes, P.S.; Mathor, M.B.; Lugão, A.B.; Bucio, E. Radiation-grafting of thermo-and pH-responsive poly (N-vinylcaprolactam-co-acrylic acid) onto silicone rubber and polypropylene films for biomedical purposes. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014, 97, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Li, X.; Li, P.; Saravanan, R.; Basu, A.; Mishra, B.; Lim, S.H.; Su, X.; Tambyah, P.A.; Leong, S.S.J. Antimicrobial functionalization of silicone surfaces with engineered short peptides having broad spectrum antimicrobial and salt-resistant properties. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Goel, N.; Kumar, V.; Rao, M.; Bhardwaj, Y.; Sabharwal, S. Functionalization of cotton fabrics by radiation induced grafting of quaternary salt to impart antibacterial property. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Yang, J.M.; Lin, H.T.; Wu, T.H.; Chen, C.C. Wettability and antibacterial assessment of chitosan containing radiation-induced graft nonwoven fabric of polypropylene-g-acrylic acid. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Terada, A.; Yuasa, A.; Tsuneda, S.; Hirata, A.; Katakai, A.; Tamada, M. Elucidation of dominant effect on initial bacterial adhesion onto polymer surfaces prepared by radiation-induced graft polymerization. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2005, 43, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Murata, H.; Koepsel, R.R.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Russell, A.J. Permanent, non-leaching antibacterial surfaces—2: How high density cationic surfaces kill bacterial cells. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 4870–4879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Anjum, N.; Bellon-Fontaine, M.N.; Herry, J.M.; Riquet, A.M. A novel process to develop modified polymeric surfaces for the analysis of bacterial adhesion: Surface properties and adhesion test. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 1746–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Huang, C.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.H. Functional finishing on silk fabric with acrylamide monomer and chitosan. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 175–176, 696–702. [Google Scholar]
  190. Ye, F.; Huang, C.; Jiang, X.; He, W.; Gao, X.; Ma, L.; Ao, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, Q. Reusable fibrous adsorbent prepared via Co-radiation induced graft polymerization for iodine adsorption. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Goel, N.; Rao, M.; Kumar, V.; Bhardwaj, Y.; Chaudhari, C.; Dubey, K.; Sabharwal, S. Synthesis of antibacterial cotton fabric by radiation-induced grafting of [2-(Methacryloyloxy) ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MAETC) onto cotton. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2009, 78, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Salmieri, S.; Khan, R.A.; Safrany, A.; Lacroix, M. Gamma rays-induced 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate graft copolymerization on methylcellulose-based films: Structure analysis and physicochemical properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 70, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hoffman, A. Radiation technology for immobilization of bioactive materials. In IAEA Publication TECDOC-486; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  194. IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Processing Technology Applications in Bioengineering; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  195. IAEA. Radiation Synthesis and Modification of Polymers for Biomedical Applications; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2002; Volume 34. [Google Scholar]
  196. IAEA. Nanoscale Radiation Engineering of Advanced Materials for Potential Biomedical Applications; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  197. Peppas, N.A.; Hilt, J.Z.; Khademhosseini, A.; Langer, R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1345–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Anderson, J.M.; Rodriguez, A.; Chang, D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Guimard, N.K.; Gomez, N.; Schmidt, C.E. Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 876–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Balint, R.; Cassidy, N.J.; Cartmell, S.H. Conductive polymers: Towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 2341–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Ward, M.A.; Georgiou, T.K. Thermoresponsive polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers 2011, 3, 1215–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Ramanavičius, A.; Ramanavičienė, A.; Malinauskas, A. Electrochemical sensors based on conducting polymer—Polypyrrole. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 6025–6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Hasan, J.; Crawford, R.J.; Ivanova, E.P. Antibacterial surfaces: The quest for a new generation of biomaterials. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Webb, R.C.; Bonifas, A.P.; Behnaz, A.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, K.J.; Cheng, H.; Shi, M.; Bian, Z.; Liu, Z.; Kim, Y.-S. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Zhang, J.; Peppas, N.A. Synthesis and characterization of pH-and temperature-sensitive poly (methacrylic acid)/poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) interpenetrating polymeric networks. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Kingshott, P.; Wei, J.; Bagge-Ravn, D.; Gadegaard, N.; Gram, L. Covalent attachment of poly (ethylene glycol) to surfaces, critical for reducing bacterial adhesion. Langmuir 2003, 19, 6912–6921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Kobayashi, M.; Chang, Y.-S.; Oka, M. A two year in vivo study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3243–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Chen, C. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2017, 2, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 04831 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation for preparation of functional polymeric materials by RIGC and functionalisation.
Figure 1. Schematic representation for preparation of functional polymeric materials by RIGC and functionalisation.
Polymers 14 04831 g001
Polymers 14 04831 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of examples of FPBMs prepared by RIGC for various applications.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of examples of FPBMs prepared by RIGC for various applications.
Polymers 14 04831 g002
Polymers 14 04831 g003 550
Figure 3. Multi-step strategy used to evaluate the bibliometrics of FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Figure 3. Multi-step strategy used to evaluate the bibliometrics of FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Polymers 14 04831 g003
Polymers 14 04831 g004 550
Figure 4. Graphical representation of: (A) various applications % of FPBMs with bioactive properties prepared by RIGC and (B) distribution % of their related publications. Total number of records is 235.
Figure 4. Graphical representation of: (A) various applications % of FPBMs with bioactive properties prepared by RIGC and (B) distribution % of their related publications. Total number of records is 235.
Polymers 14 04831 g004
Polymers 14 04831 g005 550
Figure 5. Frequency of publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC per year in the period of 1985–2021.
Figure 5. Frequency of publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC per year in the period of 1985–2021.
Polymers 14 04831 g005
Polymers 14 04831 g006 550
Figure 6. Top 10 authors’ productivity over the period of 1985–2021. The line represents an author’s timeline; the size of the bubbles is proportional to the number of documents produced by an author per year; the colour intensity of the bubble is proportional to the total number of citations per year; the first bubble on the line indicates when the author began to publish in the field; the bigger the bubble is, the higher the number of articles published by an author per year; bubbles with deeper colour intensity indicate higher citation counts.
Figure 6. Top 10 authors’ productivity over the period of 1985–2021. The line represents an author’s timeline; the size of the bubbles is proportional to the number of documents produced by an author per year; the colour intensity of the bubble is proportional to the total number of citations per year; the first bubble on the line indicates when the author began to publish in the field; the bigger the bubble is, the higher the number of articles published by an author per year; bubbles with deeper colour intensity indicate higher citation counts.
Polymers 14 04831 g006
Polymers 14 04831 g007 550
Figure 7. Corresponding author–country collaboration represented by relationship between multiple country and single country publications.
Figure 7. Corresponding author–country collaboration represented by relationship between multiple country and single country publications.
Polymers 14 04831 g007
Polymers 14 04831 g008 550
Figure 8. Three-factor plots of the relationship among countries–authors keywords (keywords cloud generated from titles and abstracts) for FPBMs prepared by RIGC literatures. Obtained from that was obtained using Biblioshiny (R-Studio) software.
Figure 8. Three-factor plots of the relationship among countries–authors keywords (keywords cloud generated from titles and abstracts) for FPBMs prepared by RIGC literatures. Obtained from that was obtained using Biblioshiny (R-Studio) software.
Polymers 14 04831 g008
Polymers 14 04831 g009 550
Figure 9. Co-occurrence of clustered keywords network of publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC. (Obtained by VOSViewer).
Figure 9. Co-occurrence of clustered keywords network of publications on FPBMs prepared by RIGC. (Obtained by VOSViewer).
Polymers 14 04831 g009
Polymers 14 04831 g010 550
Figure 10. Keywords related to FPBMs obtained by RIGC: (A) combined network visualisation and (B) density map of co-occurrence. (Obtained from VOSViewer).
Figure 10. Keywords related to FPBMs obtained by RIGC: (A) combined network visualisation and (B) density map of co-occurrence. (Obtained from VOSViewer).
Polymers 14 04831 g010
Table
Table 1. Classification of FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Table 1. Classification of FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
FieldApplicationsReferences
MedicalImplants[60,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]
Catheter[58,59,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]
Surgical sutures[54,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98]
Wound dressing hydrogels/patches[61,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]
BiomedicalScaffolds for tissue engineering[56,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117]
Cell culture plates[55,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127]
Drug release carrier/delivery[49,50,52,53,54,83,102,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152]
BiotechnologicalBiosensors[50,146,147,148,149,150,151]
Support for enzyme immobilization/release[58,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161]
Antifouling membranes[66,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172]
Health careAntimicrobial fabrics and films[63,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189]
Protective face mask[62,63,190]
Packaging films[64,65,191,192]
Table
Table 2. Highly influential journals in relation to published articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Table 2. Highly influential journals in relation to published articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
SourceTP (%), 1985–2021TCPublisherCountryIF 2021Quartile
(Q)
Radiation Physics and Chemistry28 (11.96)904ElsevierUK2.8581
Journal of Applied Polymer Science16 (6.83)856WileyUSA3.0572
ACTA Biomaterialia9 (3.84)640ElsevierNetherlands10.6331
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms8 (3.40)395ElsevierNetherlands1.3772
Progress in Polymer Science8 (3.40)5506ElsevierUK31.2811
Biomaterials9 (3.01)2241ElsevierUK12.4791
Polymer6 (2.56)754ElsevierNetherlands4.9671
Macromolecules5 (2.13)378American Chemical SocietyUSA6.0571
Materials5 (2.13)270MDPISwitzerland3.7482
Langmuir4 (1.71)1010American Chemical SocietyUSA4.3311
Q = Quartile index; TP = Total publications; TC = Total citations; IF = Impact factor.
Table
Table 3. Top 10 highly cited review papers on FPBMs prepared by RIGC from 1985 to 2021.
Table 3. Top 10 highly cited review papers on FPBMs prepared by RIGC from 1985 to 2021.
RankTitle, Ref.DOIFirst Author—Corresponding Author *Countries’ ContributionSource, (Q 2021), IF 2021TC (1985–2021)C/Y *Open Access Designation
1Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials, [107]10.1038/NMAT2614 Stuart, Martien A. Cohen—Igor Luzinov *, Sergiy Minko *Netherlands, UK, USANature materials, (1), 43.8414011364.63-
2Hydrogels in biology and medicine: from molecular principles to bionanotechnology, [197]10.1002/adma.200501612Peppas, Nicholas A. *—Langer, Robert *USAAdvanced materials, (1), 32.0862689179.26-
3Foreign body reaction to biomaterials, [198]10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004Anderson, James M. -Analiz Rodriguez *USASeminars in immunology, (1), 8.8562648203.69Green accepted
4Stimuli-responsive polymers and their bioconjugates, [29]10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003Eun Seok Gil—Samuel M.Hudson *USAProgress in polymer science (1), 31.2811976116.23-
5Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering, [199]10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.012Nathalie K.Guimard—Christine E.Schmidt *USAProgress in polymer science (1), 31.281105975.64-
6Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering, [200]10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.015Richard Balint—Sarah H.Cartmell *UKActa Biomaterialia, (1), 10.121860122.85Green published, hybrid
7Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity, [62]-Alexandra Muñoz-Bonilla *—MartaFernández-García *SpainProgress in polymer science (1), 31.28181690.66-
8Thermoresponsive Polymers for Biomedical Applications, [201]10.3390/polym3031215Mark A. Ward *UKPolymers (1), 4.96767867.8Green submitted, gold
9Electrochemical sensors based on conducting polymer- polypyrrole, [202]10.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.052‪Arunas Ramanaviciu *LithuaniaElectrochimica Acta (1), 6.90164040Open access
10Antibacterial surfaces: the quest for a new generation of biomaterials, [203]10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.017JafarHasan, Elena P. Ivanova *AustraliaTrends in biotechnology (1), 19.5354860.88Open Access
C/Y = Citation per year; TC = Total citations; IF = Impact factor.
Table
Table 4. Top 10 highly cited original research articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Table 4. Top 10 highly cited original research articles on FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
RankTitle/ReferenceApplicationDOIFirst Author—Research Leader *Countries’ ContributionSource, (Q 2021), (IF 2021)TC (1985–2021)C/Y
1Effect of comonomer hydrophilicity and ionization on the lower critical solution temperature of N-isopropylacrylamide copolymers, [152]Controlled drug delivery10.1021/ma00062a016H. Feil *NetherlandsMacromolecules, (1), (5.985)91932.82
2Thermo-responsive polymeric surfaces; control of attachment and detachment of cultured cells, [118]Cell culture10.1002/marc.1990.030111109N Yamada/T. Okano *JapanDie makromolekulare chemie, rapid communication, (-), (4.839)75035.71
3Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin, [204]Biosensordoi.org/10.1038/nmat3755R. Chad Webb/J. A. Rogers *USA, China, SingaporeNature materials, (1), (47.656)68986.12
4Permanent, non-leaching antibacterial surfaces—2: How high density cationic surfaces kill bacterial cells, [187]Antimicrobial surface10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.012H. Murata/A. J. Russell *USABiomaterials, (1), (12.479)49235.14
5Synthesis and characterization of pH- and temperature-sensitive poly(methacrylic acid)/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) interpenetrating polymeric networks, [205]Controlled drug delivery10.1021/ma00128a007C. S. Brazel *USAMacromolecules (1), (5.985)43616.76
6Ultrathin poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) grafted layer on polystyrene surfaces for cell adhesion/detachment control, [120]Cell culture plates10.1021/la036139fY. Akiyama/ T. Okano *JapanLangmuir, (1), (4.331)43225.41
7Functional bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface, [121]Cell culture plates10.1097/01.TP.0000110320.45678.30K. Nishida/ T. Okano *JapanTransplantation, (2), (4.74)42424.94
8Covalent attachment of poly(ethylene glycol) to surfaces, critical for reducing bacterial adhesion, [206]Antifouling surface10.1021/LA034032MP. Kingshott *DenmarkLangmuir, (1), (4.331)26614.77
9A two year in vivo study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus, [207]Knee implant10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.028M. Kobayashi *JapanBiomaterials, (1), (12.47)25916.18
10Two-Dimensional Manipulation of Cardiac Myocyte
Sheets Utilizing Temperature-Responsive Culture
Dishes Augments the Pulsatile Amplitude, [126]		Cell culture plates (Cardiac myocyte
tissue)		10.1089/107632701300062732T. Shimizu/
T. Okano *		JapanTissue Engineering: Part A
(2), (3.845)		18618.60
C/Y = Citation per year; TC = Total citations; IF = Impact factor.
Table
Table 5. Top 10 influential researchers (based on TC) on FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
Table 5. Top 10 influential researchers (based on TC) on FPBMs prepared by RIGC.
RankAuthorTC (1985–2021)No of PublicationAffiliationCountry
1T. Okano485420Tokyo Women Med Univ, Inst Adv Biomed Engn & Sci, TWIns, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, JapanJapan
2M. Yamato285511Tokyo Women Med Univ, Ctr Excellence Century 21, Inst Adv Biomed Engn & Sci, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, JapanJapan
3A. Kikuchi20757Tokyo Women Med Univ, Ctr Excellence Century 21, Inst Adv Biomed Engn & Sci, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, JapanJapan
4B. Emilio59230Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ciencias Nucl, Dept Quim Radiac & Radioquim, Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, MexicoMexico
5B. Gupta36512Indian Inst Technol, Dept Text Technol, New Delhi 110016, IndiaIndia
6A. Concheiro30016Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Farm & Tecnol Farmaceut, Santiago De Compostela 15782, SpainSpain
7C. Alvarez-Lorenzo30016Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Farm & Tecnol Farmaceut, Santiago De Compostela 15782, SpainSpain
8G. Burillo2898Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ciencias Nucl, Dept Quim Radiac & Radioquim, Mexico City 04510, DF, MexicoMexico
9H. Singh26410Indian Inst Technol, Dept Text Technol, New Delhi 110016, IndiaIndia
10H. I. Melendez-Ortiz827Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ciencias Nucl, Dept Quim Radiac & Radioquim, Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, MexicoMexico
TC = Total citations.
Table
Table 6. Most influential countries that provided funds for FPBMs prepared by RIGC in the period of 1985–2021.
Table 6. Most influential countries that provided funds for FPBMs prepared by RIGC in the period of 1985–2021.
RankCountryh-IndexAll CitationsAll Articles% of Total Fund
1USA2817,5583715.7
2Japan2551353514.9
3India2120412811.9
4China1921792611.1
5Mexico165923012.8
6Spain121217198.1
7Portugal91458104.3
8Canada8451483.4
9Germany7467393.8
10UK7586383.4
Table
Table 7. Temporal properties of major clusters.
Table 7. Temporal properties of major clusters.
Cluster IDSizeSilhouetteMean (Year)StartEndDurationActivenessTheme
01330.95520041962202058ActiveAcrylic Acid
1680.94219991969201445ActiveCell Sheet Engineering
2650.94120081992201826ActiveComposite Nanoparticle
3591.00019751959198930InactiveSynthesis Condition
4510.95919901945200661InactiveCritical Solution Temperature
5470.92219931974200329InactiveNon-Polar Film
6350.99520051997201114ActiveAntibacterial Surfaces
7280.99419721899201718ActiveThermo-responsive Polymer Nanocarrier
9260.98419871956199539InactiveMembrane Biosensor
10200.99020101969202051ActiveGamma-Irradiation
11190.99720011991200615InactiveMoving Trend
14160.99120001989200819InactiveBacterial Adhesion
20110.99419991989200516InactiveBiology
22110.99619851962199836InactiveAcrylonitrile Monomer
2390.99920031986200721InactivePolyethersulfone Nanofiltration Membrane
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yusefi, M.; Nasef, M.M.; Tareq, M.A.; Gupta, B.; Shameli, K.; Ali, R.R.; Ting, T.M.; El Enshasy, H.A. Bibliometrics of Functional Polymeric Biomaterials with Bioactive Properties Prepared by Radiation-Induced Graft Copolymerisation: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 4831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224831

AMA Style

Yusefi M, Nasef MM, Tareq MA, Gupta B, Shameli K, Ali RR, Ting TM, El Enshasy HA. Bibliometrics of Functional Polymeric Biomaterials with Bioactive Properties Prepared by Radiation-Induced Graft Copolymerisation: A Review. Polymers. 2022; 14(22):4831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yusefi, Mostafa, Mohamed Mahmoud Nasef, Mohammad Ali Tareq, Bhuvanesh Gupta, Kamyar Shameli, Roshafima Rasit Ali, Teo Ming Ting, and Hesham Ali El Enshasy. 2022. "Bibliometrics of Functional Polymeric Biomaterials with Bioactive Properties Prepared by Radiation-Induced Graft Copolymerisation: A Review" Polymers 14, no. 22: 4831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224831

APA Style

Yusefi, M., Nasef, M. M., Tareq, M. A., Gupta, B., Shameli, K., Ali, R. R., Ting, T. M., & El Enshasy, H. A. (2022). Bibliometrics of Functional Polymeric Biomaterials with Bioactive Properties Prepared by Radiation-Induced Graft Copolymerisation: A Review. Polymers, 14(22), 4831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop