Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Water Absorption of Hybrid Flax Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Composites with Graphene and Its Influence on Mechanical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Extra-Oral Three-Dimensional (3D) Scanning Evaluation of Three Different Impression Materials—An In Vitro Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/polym14173680
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Interactions between a Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide with the Face and Edge Surfaces of Molybdenite

by
Luver Echeverry-Vargas
1,
Darwin Estrada
1 and
Leopoldo Gutierrez
1,2,*
1
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070371, Chile
2
Water Research Center for Agriculture and Mining (CRHIAM), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070411, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(17), 3680; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173680
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 29 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 5 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Smart and Functional Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Process water used in mineral processing operations corresponds to water recovered from the thickeners and tailings dams, containing residual reagents such as hydrolyzed polyacrylamides (HPAMs). These polymers depress the flotation of different minerals, and their effect on molybdenite has been experimentally demonstrated. The objective of this work was to study the interactions between a segment of a HPAM with the face and edge of molybdenite. The sigma profile, the radial distribution functions of the HPAM, and the orientation and atomic density profiles of water molecules on the face and edge surfaces of molybdenite were calculated. The results obtained from molecular dynamics simulations showed that the interactions between the HPAM and molybdenite are mainly explained by the interactions of the amide group with the faces and edges of the mineral. Molecular dynamics simulations also showed that the HPAM molecule rearranges in such a way that the amide group moves towards the molybdenite face or edge, and the carboxylate group moves away from the mineral surface. The results obtained in the simulations showed that the interactions of the HPAM with the molybdenite edge are slightly stronger than the interaction of this molecule with the mineral face. Simulations demonstrated that the presence of the sodium and hydroxide ions reduces the concentration of HPAM around the face and edge surfaces, which is expected to affect HPAM adsorption on molybdenite. The conclusions obtained through molecular dynamics simulations are in line with the results obtained in previous studies carried out at a macroscopic scale, which reported that HPAMs adsorb onto molybdenite particles and reduce their hydrophobicity.

1. Introduction

Water availability in mineral processing plants has drastically decreased in arid mining areas [1,2], which makes it necessary to reuse the process water recovered from the thickeners and tailings dams. As a result, high concentrations of residual reagents dissolved in the process water are recirculated to grinding and flotation. It is well known that the efficiency of the froth flotation process depends on the physicochemical characteristics of the process water, as was previously demonstrated in different studies related to flotation in high salinity aqueous media [3,4].
Molybdenum is a strategic metal which is found together with copper sulfides in the porphyry copper deposits, and molybdenite (MoS2) is the main molybdenum-containing mineral [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Molybdenite particles, when dispersed in flotation slurries, occur as anisotropic entities with non-polar hydrophobic surfaces, referred to as faces, and polar hydrophilic surfaces known as edges [11]. The surface properties of molybdenite come from its crystallochemical structure made up of layers of S–Mo–S, with the S and Mo atoms connected by covalent bonds, and the S–Mo–S layers bonded by weak van der Walls forces [11]. The faces and edges are negatively charged, with the latter being more chemically active due to the interactions of molybdenum with water, forming the HMoO4− and MoO42− species. The faces are less active than the edges, but defects in the form of nano-edges create hydroxylated metallic sites for the adsorption of all types of molecules [12]. Similar to other naturally hydrophobic materials [13], molybdenite flotation is strongly affected by the presence of polymers in solution [7]. Polyacrylamide (PAMs) polymers are used as flocculants in copper processing plants to improve the settling rates of tailings in the thickening stages; consequently, residual PAMs dissolved in the process water are recycled to flotation, affecting the efficiency of the process. Previous studies showed that PAMs depress the flotation of different minerals [6,14,15], and their effect on molybdenite was reported [7].
As was previously mentioned, different polymers of high molecular weight based on PAMs are effectively used as flocculants in the copper processing plants [7]. The main functional group of PAMs is the amide group (R–CHCONH2), and for industrial applications they are modified to produce hydrolyzed PAMs (HPAMs), which contain a series of acrylic units along the main chain such as carboxylic (R–COOH−), sulfonic (R–SOO−) and amine (R–NHH+) groups, which render PAMs weakly to moderately anionic or cationic [7]. These modifications are responsible for the stretching phenomenon of the PAM molecules, which induces the bridging action on the mineral particles. The number of hydrolyzed units of the HPAMs establishes the degree of anionicity (DA) of the polymer, which can be calculated by dividing the moles of the acrylates ions m by the total moles of the acrylate ions m plus the moles of the acrylamide units n. The presence of mechanically degraded HPAMs by the action of the pumps used to recirculate process water to flotation can also affect the efficiency of molybdenite flotation [6,7]. Therefore, the interaction of the HPAMs with molybdenite particles in the flotation process is currently of interest.
The literature related to the interactions between HPAMs and molybdenite is restricted to studies in which the topic is assessed from an experimental perspective. However, to better understand the mechanisms that explain the interactions between HPAMs molecules and molybdenite, it is necessary to work in modeling these interactions at a molecular level. Regarding this topic, Jin et al. (2014) [16] used a molecular dynamics simulation to study the interactions between water molecules and the face and edge surfaces of molybdenite. Zhang et al. [17] studied the parameters for the interactions between the molybdenite faces and water using different water models. Other researchers also studied the molecular conformation of HPAMs under aqueous media of different compositions, which is expected to affect their interactions with molybdenite [9,18]. Despite all these advances, it is still necessary to study the interactions between HPAMs and molybdenite at a molecular scale.
The objective of this work was to study the interactions between a segment of a HPAM with the face and edge of molybdenite in a 0.01 M NaCl aqueous solution. The sigma profile, the radial distribution functions of the HPAM, and the orientation and atomic density profiles of water molecules on the face and edge surfaces of molybdenite were calculated.

2. Methodology

2.1. COSMO-RS Calculation

The conductor-like screening model for realistic solvents (COMSO-RS) was used to calculate the thermodynamic properties of the studied HPAM. Quantum-based equilibrium thermodynamic methods can be used to describe the molecular behavior of polymers in aqueous solutions [19], which have been shown to produce good qualitative and quantitative predictions [20,21]. The central idea of COSMO-RS is to create a virtual conductor that introduces molecules into an aqueous medium using continuous solvation models to determine its charge distribution [19]. Using the charge distribution in the form of sigma profiles which describe molecules polarity, the COSMO-RS qualitatively identified the regions in which hydrogen bonds take place. In sigma profile graphs, each peak corresponds to the charge density of an atom, constituting the molecule. When a constituent atom presents a positive partial charge, it is screened as a negative charge density, and vice versa [19]. To obtain the sigma profiles, the geometry of the HPAM section was created and optimized using the density functional theory electronic structure program DMol3 [22,23], with graphic visualization generated through Materials Studio 2017 (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Once the flocculant section was optimized, the Becke–Perdew [24] version of the functional Volsko–Wilk–Nusair [25] was used to obtain a better characterization of the charge distribution [26]. Once the data were calculated, the sigma profiles of the flocculant sections were generated.

2.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

The interactions between two HPAM molecules in a 0.01 M NaCl solution and the face and edge surfaces of molybdenite were studied using molecular dynamics simulations with the package simulation system LAMMPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) [27]. Simulations were carried out at different concentrations of NaOH, and at 298 K. The visualization system used was the VMD 1.9.3 [28], and the temperature and pressure were kept constant using a Nose–Hoover thermostat and barostat [29].
The HPAM solution models were created using the Materials studio 2017 package (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Then, 8% of the amide monomer of a PAM section was randomly replaced by a sodium carboxylate monomer to convert the PAM chain in HPAM (DA = 8%). In this work, HPAM molecules were modeled with the OPLS-AA force field (all-atom optimized potentials for liquid simulations) [30], and the SPC/E water model was used to describe the behavior of water [31]. The Lennard–Jones parameters 12–6 of Li and Mertz [32] were used for all ions.
The force field parameters of the atoms that are part of the molybdenite crystal were taken from the universal force field (UFF) [33]. The partial atomic charges of the molybdenum (Mo) and sulfur (S) atoms corresponded to the Mulliken charges that were determined from DFT calculations of a well-defined unit cell of molybdenite using the Perdew–Wang-91 function [34], and the generalized gradient approximation [35]. The force field parameters for molybdenite are listed in Table 1. The crystal structure of molybdenite used in this study was taken from the Crystallography Open Database (COD) [36]. The lattice parameters of molybdenite were all from X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of natural crystals. To study the interactions of the HPAM section with the face (001) and edge (121) of molybdenite, a S–Mo–S layer with basal dimensions Lx × Ly of 7.7 × 7.75 nm2 and a thickness of 1.54 nm was considered. Three layers were used in the simulations to minimize the interactions of the bottom layers with the water molecules absorbed on the top layer [17].
The cross section of the simulation boxes corresponded to the Lx × Ly dimensions of the molybdenite substrate with a height of 7.65 nm measured from the mineral surface. All the molybdenite atoms were constrained (frozen) in the simulations. Periodic boundary conditions were applied in the three directions of the simulation box. The HPAM molecules were embedded in the simulation box close to the molybdenite surface, then the ions were distributed at random positions maintaining a separation distance of 0.3 nm between all the atoms. Finally, 12,000 water molecules were added to the system. Figure 1 shows the simulated HPAM molecule in which the molecules of the carboxylate and amide groups, water, and sodium and chlorine ions are distinguished.
Figure 2 shows the configuration of the system to study the interactions of the HPAM with the molybdenite face. Initially, the system was simulated in a NVT configuration (a constant number of particles N, volume V, and temperature T) for 100 ps at 298 K; then, the production step was carried out in a simulation NVE configuration (a constant number of particles N, volume V, and energy E) for 10 ns at 298 K, and the data were collected every 20 ps.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Sigma Profile

In the COSMO-RS, sigma profiles provide essential information about an ionic compound’s tendency to make and accept hydrogen bonds [37]. In this work, the cutting region considered for hydrogen bond accepting is σ_HB < −0.0084 e/Å2, and for hydrogen bond donning is σ_HB > +0.0084 e/Å2. The sigma profiles of the molecules found within this region are non-polar in nature [37,38,39].
Figure 3 shows the sigma profile of the studied HPAM. The red color on the molecule surface corresponds to the positive surface charge which arises from the negative partial charges of the atoms within the molecule; the blue color corresponds to the negative surface charge resulting from the positive partial charge within the region; and the green and yellow colors correspond to regions of neutral charge. Figure 3 shows that a section of the HPAM is non-polar in nature and another significant part is found in the regions that are acceptors and donors of hydrogen bonds. The section of the molecule that accepts hydrogen bonds corresponds to the area in which the oxygen atoms belonging to the carboxylate and amide groups of HPAM are located; on the other hand, the hydrogen bond donor section is mainly explained by the presence of sodium ions, and to a lesser extent by the hydrogens of the amide group; the non-polar section of the HPAM corresponds to the hydrogens of the carbon chain.

3.2. Interactions between HPAM and Aqueous Medium

Since both the carboxylate and amide groups of the HPAM display polarity, it is expected that hydration shells and electrostatic interactions with ions and molecules may take place. To study these phenomena, the radial distribution functions (RDFs) of both the oxygen (Ow) atom of the water molecules and the sodium ion (Na+) dissolved in water, interacting with the carboxylate group of the HPAM, were calculated at different concentrations of NaOH. Figure 4a shows that the maximum probability of interaction between the Ow and the carboxylate group occurs at 2.6 Å, and that the first hydration layer around the carboxylate anion ends at 3.2 Å (3.1 Å [40] and 3.4 Å [41]). A second hydration layer is also observed, which ends at 5.3 Å (5.4 Å [40]). Figure 4b shows that the maximum probability of interaction between Na+ and the carboxylate group occurs at 2.4 Å (2.3 Å [40]), indicating that this cation can enter through the first hydration layer located around the carboxylate anion. Furthermore, the variation of the intensities of the peaks located at 2.4 Å indicates that the probability of finding sodium ions around the carboxylate groups increases with the sodium concentration.
Figure 5 shows the RDFs of Ow and Na+ around the amide group of the HPAM calculated at varying concentrations of NaOH. Figure 5a indicates the presence of a first hydration layer around the amide group ending at 3.2 Å, and of a second hydration layer at 5.6 Å. Figure 5b indicates that the sodium ion (Na+) around the amide group is located at a probable distance of 2.4 Å, which also indicates that this cation enters through the first hydration layer. The variation of the intensities of the peaks located at 2.4 Å shows that the presence of sodium around the amide group decreases with sodium concentration.

3.3. Interaction of Water with the Face and Edge Surfaces of Molybdenite

Figure 6 shows images obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of water molecules moving near the face and edge surfaces of molybdenite. The space existing between the water molecules and the molybdenite face in Figure 6a suggests the manifestation of the excluded volume effect in this system [42,43]. This phenomenon shows that the interactions between water molecules and the molybdenite basal plane are weak at a molecular level, which explains the hydrophobic character of this surface at a macroscopic level [44,45,46]. On the other hand, Figure 6b shows that water molecules tend to interact with the molybdenite edge through interactions with molybdenum atoms.
The distribution of water molecules around the faces and edges of molybdenite was studied by calculating the density profiles of the oxygen (Ow) and hydrogen (Hw) atoms of water molecules located along the Z axis normal to these mineral surfaces. Figure 7 shows the atomic density profiles of Ow and Hw calculated at varying NaOH concentrations. Figure 7a,b indicate that the interactions between the Hw and Ow atoms and the molybdenite face start around 1.5 and 2.4 Å, respectively, while the interactions of these atoms with the edge arise at 1.2 and 2.0 Å, respectively. As expected, these results indicate that the water molecules tend to be closer to the edge, which agrees with the hydrophilic character of this mineral surface. The presence of the Ow and Hw atoms is observed at farther distances from the molybdenite faces.
Figure 7a shows that the atomic density profiles of Hw and Ow around the molybdenite face display initial peaks at 3.6 and 3.3 Å, respectively. The fact that the first peak of Ow is located closer to the face surface suggests that the oxygen atoms of the water molecules are preferentially orientated towards the mineral surface in the first hydration layer. The atomic density profiles of Hw and Ow around the molybdenite face also display secondary peaks at 6.9 and 6.3 Å, respectively. The width of these peaks and their intensity suggest the presence of complex structures of water molecules. The results indicate that the density profiles relax at distances around 10 Å, suggesting a bulk-like behavior.
Figure 7b shows that the atomic density profiles of Hw and Ow around the molybdenite edge exhibit initial peaks at 3.1 Å, which indicates that there is no preferential orientation of the atoms towards the edge of the molybdenite crystal. The secondary peaks of Hw and Ow are located at 6.9 and 6.6 Å, respectively. Again, the shape and intensity of these peaks suggest the existence of water structures, and the density profiles also relax at distances around 10 Å. Due to the natural hydrophobicity of the molybdenite faces and the relatively weak hydrophilic character of the mineral edges (in a non-oxidized condition), water molecules tend to be excluded from these surfaces. The primary Hw density peaks around the molybdenite face and edge are located at 3.6 and 3.3 Å, distances that are longer than the distance between water molecules bonded by hydrogen bonds, which is about 2.8 Å [47,48,49]. This result demonstrates the weak interaction between the water molecules with the face and edge of molybdenite.

3.4. Interactions of the Amide and Carboxylate Groups of the HPAM with the Molybdenite Face

Figure 8 shows images of the initial configuration of the HPAM molecules in which the carboxylate and amide groups were intended to be directed towards the surface of the molybdenite face. Figure 9 shows snapshots of the HPAM molecules located around the surface of the molybdenite face, at varying simulation times and NaOH concentrations. At short simulation times (0.1 ns), HPAM molecules tend to rearrange themselves in such a way that the amide group moves towards the molybdenite face, and the carboxylate group tends to move away from this hydrophobic surface. As the simulation time elapses, the hydrophobic interactions of the face surface with the amide group of the HPAM molecule become more relevant.
Figure 10 shows the atomic density profiles of the hydrogen (Ha) and oxygen (Oa) atoms of the amide group, and the oxygen (Oc) atom of the carboxylate group in the vicinity of the molybdenite face, calculated at different NaOH concentrations. Figure 10a,b indicate that the interactions between the Ha and Oa atoms and the molybdenite face start at around 1.5 and 2.7 Å, respectively. Figure 10a shows that the first peak of Ha is displayed at 3.3 Å from the surface, which indicates that most of these atoms interact at this distance with the molybdenite face. There are several Ha peaks beyond 3.3 Å, which reveals the presence of other layers of HPAM molecules. It is worth noting that the intensity of the different peaks decreases in the presence of NaOH molecules, indicating some effect of the ions on the HPAM adsorption on the face. Figure 10b shows the atomic density profiles of the Oa atoms, which display a sharp peak around 3.3 Å, and that the atomic density decreases with the increase of the NaOH concentrations. Figure 10c shows the atomic densities of the Oc atoms that show two major peaks at 8.1 and 10.5 Å, which indicates that the interactions between the molybdenite face and the carboxylate group are weaker than those with the amide group. It can also be seen that the interactions of the carboxylate group with the mineral face start at 3.9 Å. A substantial reduction of the peak intensities can be seen when 2 NaOH molecules are added, causing the highest number of Oc atoms to be located 10.5 Å from the molybdenite face, which indicates that the increase in NaOH causes the carboxylate groups of the flocculant to move away from the surface of the mineral face. All these results indicate that the interaction between the HPAM and the molybdenite face occurs mainly through the interaction of the amide group with the basal planes of the mineral.

3.5. Interactions of the Amide and Carboxylate Groups of the HPAM with the Molybdenite Edge

Figure 11 displays images of the initial configuration of the HPAM molecules with the carboxylate and amide groups directed towards the surface of the molybdenite edge, while Figure 12 shows snapshots of the HPAM obtained at varying simulation times and NaOH concentrations. Again, at longer simulation times, HPAM molecules reorient in such a way that the amide group move towards the molybdenum atoms exposed on the edge surface, and the carboxylate groups tend to organize away from the edge. The interaction of the amide group with the molybdenite edge becomes stronger with time.
Figure 13 shows the atomic density profiles of the Ha, Oa, and Oc atoms around the molybdenite edge, calculated at varying NaOH concentrations. Figure 13a,b indicate that the interactions between the Ha and Oa atoms and the molybdenite edge start around 1.2 and 1.8 Å, respectively, which are shorter distances than those observed with the molybdenite face. As seen in Figure 13a, the first Ha density peak is displayed at 3.0 Å, with the intensity decreasing in the presence of the NaOH molecules which indicates that HPAM adsorption on the edges is negatively affected by the presence of sodium and hydroxide ions. Figure 13b shows the atomic density profiles of the Oa atom, which display a sharp peak at around 3.0 Å; the atomic density of this peak decreases with the increase of NaOH. This result indicates that the number of oxygen atoms of the amide group decreases in the vicinity of the molybdenite edge because of the increase in NaOH. The atomic densities of the Oc atoms presented in Figure 13c show two major peaks at 6.3 and 8.1 Å, which indicates that the interactions between the molybdenite edge and the carboxylate group are weaker than those with the amide group. It can also be seen that the interactions of the carboxylate group with the mineral edge start at 3.0 Å. The peak intensities decrease in the presence of NaOH molecules, which indicates that the increase in NaOH causes the carboxylate groups of the flocculant to move away from the surface of the mineral face.

4. Conclusions

The main conclusions of the study are summarized as follows:
  • The results obtained from molecular dynamics simulations show that the interactions between the HPAM and molybdenite are mainly explained by the interactions of the amide group with the faces and edges of molybdenite.
  • Molecular dynamics simulations show that the HPAM molecule rearranges, the amide group moves towards the molybdenite face or edge, and the carboxylate group moves away from the mineral.
  • The results obtained in the simulations show that the interactions of the HPAM with the molybdenite edge are slightly stronger than the interaction of this molecule with the mineral face.
  • Simulations indicate that the presence of the sodium and hydroxide ions reduces the concentration of HPAM around the face and edge surfaces. HPAM adsorption on molybdenite is expected to be affected at high pH and in salty water.
  • The density profiles of the oxygen (Ow) and hydrogen (Hw) atoms of the water molecules located along the Z axis normal to the face and edge surfaces of molybdenite indicate that the water molecules tend to be closer to the edge, which confirms the hydrophilicity character of this mineral surface observed at a macroscopic level.
  • The conclusions obtained through molecular dynamic simulations are in line with the results obtained in previous studies completed at a macroscopic level, which indicated that HPAMs adsorb on molybdenite particles and reduce their hydrophobicity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, software, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, L.E.-V.; methodology, investigation, D.E.; conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Water Research Centre for Agriculture and Mining (CRHIAM) of the Universidad de Concepcion, sponsored by the ANID/FONDAP/15130015 project. L.G. wants to thank projects ANID/ACT210030, ANID/Fondecyt/1211705 and ANID/FSEQ210002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kinnunen, P.; Obenaus-Emler, J.; Raatikaine, J.; Guignot, S.; Guimerà, J.; Ciroth, A.; Heiskanen, K. Review of closed water loops with ore sorting and tailings valorisation for a more sustainable mining industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oyarzún, J.; Oyarzún, R. Sustainable development threats, inter-sector conflicts and environmental policy re-quirements in the arid, mining rich, Northern Chile territory. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 19, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yepsen, R.; Gutierrez, L.; Laskowski, J. Flotation behavior of enargite in the process of flotation using seawater. Miner. Eng. 2019, 142, 105897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramirez, A.; Gutierrez, L.; Laskowski, J. Use of “oily bubbles” and dispersants in flotation of molybdenite in fresh and seawater. Miner. Eng. 2020, 148, 106197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alvarez, A.; Gutierrez, L.; Laskowski, J. Use of polyethylene oxide to improve flotation of fine molybdenite. Miner. Eng. 2018, 127, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Castro, S.; Laskowski, J.S. Depressing effect of flocculants on molybdenite flotation. Miner. Eng. 2015, 74, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Echeverry, L.; Estrada, D.; Toledo, P.G.; Gutierrez, L. The depressing effect of an anionic polyacrylamide on molyb-denite flotation and the importance of polymer anionicity. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 629, 127506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arinaitwe, E.; Pawlik, M. A method for measuring the degree of anionicity of polyacrylamide-based flocculants. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2009, 91, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Quezada, G.R.; Saavedra, J.H.; Rozas, R.E.; Toledo, P.G. Molecular dynamics simulations of the conformation and diffusion of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide in highly saline solutions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 214, 115366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Z.; Ralston, J.; Liu, Q. Face or Edge? Control of Molybdenite Surface Interactions with Divalent Cations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 172–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chander, S.; Fuerstenau, D.W. On the natural floatability of molybdenite. Trans. Soc. Min. Eng. AIME 1972, 252, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Y.; Chen, X.; Peng, Y. The effect of sodium hydrosulfide on molybdenite flotation in seawater and diluted seawater. Miner. Eng. 2020, 158, 106589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gutierrez, L.; Pawlik, M. Influence of humic acids on oil sand processing. Part I: Detection and quantification of humic acids in oil sand ores and their effect on bitumen wettability. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2014, 126, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, G.; Zhong, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xia, L. The role of cationic polyacrylamide in the reverse flotation of diasporic bauxite. Miner. Eng. 2007, 20, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, K.; Wang, L.; Cao, M.; Liu, Q. Xanthation-modified polyacrylamide and spectroscopic investigation of its ad-sorption onto mineral surfaces. Miner. Eng. 2012, 39, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jin, J.; Miller, J.D.; Dang, L.X. Molecular dynamics simulation and analysis of interfacial water at selected sulfide mineral surfaces under anaerobic conditions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2014, 128, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Luan, B.; Zhou, R. Parameterization of Molybdenum Disulfide Interacting with Water Using the Free Energy Perturbation Method. J. Phys. Chem. 2019, 123, 7243–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, P.; Yao, L.; Liu, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhou, G.; Jiang, B. Experimental and theoretical study of dilute polyacrylamide so-lutions: Effect of salt concentration. J. Mol. Model. 2012, 18, 3153–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ojeda, R.M.; Llovell, F. Soft-SAFT Transferable Molecular Models for the Description of Gas Solubility in Eutectic Ammonium Salt-Based Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 63, 2599–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pye, C.C.; Ziegler, T.; Lenthe, E.V.; Louwen, J.N. An implementation of the conductor-like screening model of solvation within the amsterdam density functional package—Part II. COSMO for real solvents. Can. J. Chem. 2009, 87, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klamt, A.; Schüürmann, G. COSMO: A new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1993, 2, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Delley, B. An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Delley, B. From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756–7764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vosko, S.H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calcu-lations: A critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mullins, E.; Oldland, R.; Liu, Y.A.; Wang, S.; Sandler, A.A.; Chen, C.C.; Zwolak, M.; Seavey, K. Sigma-profile database for using COSMO-based thermodynamic methods. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2006, 45, 4389–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoover, W.G. Constant-pressure equations of motion. Phys. Rev. A 1986, 34, 2499–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jorgensen, W.L.; Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Grigera, J.; Straatsma, T.P. The Missing Term in Effective Pair Potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269–6271. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pengfei, L.; Kenneth, M.; Merz, J. Taking into account the ion-induced dipole interaction in the nonbonded model of ions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 289–297. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rappé, A.K.; Casewit, C.J.; Colwell, K.S.; Goddard, W.A.; Skiff, W.M. UFF: A full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024–10035. [Google Scholar]
  34. Perdew, J.P.; Chevary, J.A.; Vosko, S.H.; Jackson, K.A.; Pederson, M.R.; Singh, D.J.; Fiolhais, C. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671–6687. [Google Scholar]
  35. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Graulis, S.; Chateigner, D.; Downs, R.T.; Yokochi, A.F.T.; Quirós, M.; Lutterotti, L.; Manakova, E.; Butkus, J.; Moeck, P.; Bail, A.L. Crystallography Open Database—An open-access collection of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 726–729. [Google Scholar]
  37. Phadagi, R.; Singh, S.; Hashemi, H.; Kaya, S.; Venkatesu, P.; Ramjugernath, D.; Ebenso, E.E.; Bahadur, I. Understanding the role of Dimethylformamide as co-solvents in the dissolution of cellulose in ionic liquids: Experimental and theoretical approach. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 328, 115392. [Google Scholar]
  38. Vishnoi, A.; Banerjee, T.; Ghosh, P.; Musharaf Ali, S.; Shenoy, K.T. Theoretical prediction of distribution coefficients of Sr2+ in nuclear waste/ionic liquid phases using COSMO-RS model. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 133, 138–148. [Google Scholar]
  39. Qin, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Wei, X.; Nong, W.; Wei, X.; Liang, J. Experimental Determination and Computational Prediction of Dehydroabietic Acid Solubility in (−)-α-Pinene + (−)-β-Caryophyllene + P-Cymene System. Molecules 2022, 27, 1220. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuan, R.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Fang, H.; Wang, W. Study about how the metal cationic ions affect the properties of partially hydrolyzed hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide (HMHPAM) in aqueous solution. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 434, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
  41. Payaka, A.; Tongraar, A.; Rode, B.M. QM/MM Dynamics of CH3COO−Water Hydrogen Bonds in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. 2010, 114, 10443–10453. [Google Scholar]
  42. Abraham, F.F. The interfacial density profile of a Lennard-Jones fluid in contact with a (100) Lennard-Jones wall and its relationship to idealized fluid/wall systems: A Monte Carlo simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 3713–3716. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu, C.J.; Richter, A.G.; Datta, A.; Durbin, M.K.; Dutta, P. Observation of molecular layering in thin liquid films using X-ray reflectivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 2326–2329. [Google Scholar]
  44. Song, S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, B.; Lopez-Mendoza, A. Flotation of molybdenite fines as hydrophobic agglomerates. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 98, 451–455. [Google Scholar]
  45. Castro, S.; Lopez-Valdivieso, A.; Laskowski, J.S. Review of the flotation of molybdenite. Part I: Surface properties and floatability. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 148, 48–58. [Google Scholar]
  46. He, T.; Li, H.; Jin, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wan, H. Improving fine molybdenite flotation using a combination of aliphatic hydrocarbon oil and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. Results Phys. 2019, 12, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dang, L.X.; Montgomery Pettitt, B. A theoretical study of like ion pairs in solution. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 4303–4308. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee, S.H. Molecular dynamics simulation of ion mobility. 2. alkali metal and halide ions using the spc/e model for water at 25 °C. J. Phys Chem. 1996, 100, 1420–1425. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lynden-Bell, R.M.; Rasaiah, J.C. From hydrophobic to hydrophilic behaviour: A simulation study of solvation entropy and free energy of simple solutes. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 1981. [Google Scholar]
Polymers 14 03680 g001 550
Figure 1. HPAM molecule indicating the areas where the carboxylate and amide groups are inserted. The water molecules and the sodium and chlorine ions are also described.
Figure 1. HPAM molecule indicating the areas where the carboxylate and amide groups are inserted. The water molecules and the sodium and chlorine ions are also described.
Polymers 14 03680 g001
Polymers 14 03680 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular dynamics simulation setup. (a) Molybdenite face with two hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) molecules; (b) molybdenite face with two HPAM molecules and sodium and chlorine ions; (c) molybdenite face with two HPAM molecules, sodium and chlorine ions, and water molecules.
Figure 2. Molecular dynamics simulation setup. (a) Molybdenite face with two hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) molecules; (b) molybdenite face with two HPAM molecules and sodium and chlorine ions; (c) molybdenite face with two HPAM molecules, sodium and chlorine ions, and water molecules.
Polymers 14 03680 g002
Polymers 14 03680 g003 550
Figure 3. Sigma profile of a HPAM segment surface.
Figure 3. Sigma profile of a HPAM segment surface.
Polymers 14 03680 g003
Polymers 14 03680 g004 550
Figure 4. Radial distribution functions (g(r)) of (a) Ow and (b) Na+ interacting with the carboxylate group of the HPAM at varying concentrations of NaOH.
Figure 4. Radial distribution functions (g(r)) of (a) Ow and (b) Na+ interacting with the carboxylate group of the HPAM at varying concentrations of NaOH.
Polymers 14 03680 g004
Polymers 14 03680 g005 550
Figure 5. Radial distribution functions (g(r)) of (a) Ow and (b) Na+ interacting with the amide group of the HPAM at varying concentrations of NaOH.
Figure 5. Radial distribution functions (g(r)) of (a) Ow and (b) Na+ interacting with the amide group of the HPAM at varying concentrations of NaOH.
Polymers 14 03680 g005
Polymers 14 03680 g006 550
Figure 6. Images of molybdenite/water interfaces: (a) molybdenite face; (b) molybdenite edge. The atoms’ color codes are as follows: S, yellow; Mo, pink; H, blue; O, red.
Figure 6. Images of molybdenite/water interfaces: (a) molybdenite face; (b) molybdenite edge. The atoms’ color codes are as follows: S, yellow; Mo, pink; H, blue; O, red.
Polymers 14 03680 g006
Polymers 14 03680 g007 550
Figure 7. Density profiles of the oxygen (Ow) and hydrogen (Hw) atoms of the water molecules located along the Z axis normal to the (a) molybdenite face and (b) edge surfaces. These calculations were conducted at different concentrations of NaOH.
Figure 7. Density profiles of the oxygen (Ow) and hydrogen (Hw) atoms of the water molecules located along the Z axis normal to the (a) molybdenite face and (b) edge surfaces. These calculations were conducted at different concentrations of NaOH.
Polymers 14 03680 g007
Polymers 14 03680 g008 550
Figure 8. Snapshots of initial configuration for simulation of two molecules of HPAM over the molybdenite face; (a) side view and (b) top view.
Figure 8. Snapshots of initial configuration for simulation of two molecules of HPAM over the molybdenite face; (a) side view and (b) top view.
Polymers 14 03680 g008
Polymers 14 03680 g009 550
Figure 9. Snapshots of the mineral face/HPAM interfaces: (a) No-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (b) No-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (c) 1-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (d) 1-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (e) 2-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (f) 2-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns. Na+, Cl−, and OH− ions are not shown to facilitate the visualization of HPAM molecules.
Figure 9. Snapshots of the mineral face/HPAM interfaces: (a) No-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (b) No-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (c) 1-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (d) 1-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (e) 2-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (f) 2-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns. Na+, Cl−, and OH− ions are not shown to facilitate the visualization of HPAM molecules.
Polymers 14 03680 g009
Polymers 14 03680 g010 550
Figure 10. Density profiles of the (a) hydrogen atoms of amide groups (Ha), (b) oxygen atoms of amide groups (Oa), and (c) oxygen atoms of carboxylate groups (Oc) located along the Z axis normal to the molybdenite face. These calculations were conducted at different concentrations of NaOH.
Figure 10. Density profiles of the (a) hydrogen atoms of amide groups (Ha), (b) oxygen atoms of amide groups (Oa), and (c) oxygen atoms of carboxylate groups (Oc) located along the Z axis normal to the molybdenite face. These calculations were conducted at different concentrations of NaOH.
Polymers 14 03680 g010
Polymers 14 03680 g011 550
Figure 11. Snapshots of the initial configuration for simulation of two molecules of HPAM over the edge of MoS2: (a) side view, (b) top view.
Figure 11. Snapshots of the initial configuration for simulation of two molecules of HPAM over the edge of MoS2: (a) side view, (b) top view.
Polymers 14 03680 g011
Polymers 14 03680 g012 550
Figure 12. Snapshots of the mineral edge/HPAM interfaces: (a) No-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (b) No-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (c) 1-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (d) 1-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (e) 2-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (f) 2-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns. Na+, Cl−, and OH− ions are not shown to facilitate the visualization of HPAM molecules.
Figure 12. Snapshots of the mineral edge/HPAM interfaces: (a) No-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (b) No-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (c) 1-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (d) 1-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns; (e) 2-NaOH, t = 0.1 ns; (f) 2-NaOH, t = 10.0 ns. Na+, Cl−, and OH− ions are not shown to facilitate the visualization of HPAM molecules.
Polymers 14 03680 g012
Polymers 14 03680 g013 550
Figure 13. Atomic density profile of (a) hydrogen atoms of amide groups, (b) oxygen atoms of amide groups, and (c) oxygen atoms of carboxylate groups of the flocculant on the molybdenite edge surface.
Figure 13. Atomic density profile of (a) hydrogen atoms of amide groups, (b) oxygen atoms of amide groups, and (c) oxygen atoms of carboxylate groups of the flocculant on the molybdenite edge surface.
Polymers 14 03680 g013
Table
Table 1. Force field parameters for molybdenite (MoS2).
Table 1. Force field parameters for molybdenite (MoS2).
MineralAtomɛ (Kcal/mol)rm (Å)Mulliken Charge (q)
Molybdenite (MoS2)Mo0.0563.0560.458
S0.2744.035−0.229
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Echeverry-Vargas, L.; Estrada, D.; Gutierrez, L. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Interactions between a Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide with the Face and Edge Surfaces of Molybdenite. Polymers 2022, 14, 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173680

AMA Style

Echeverry-Vargas L, Estrada D, Gutierrez L. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Interactions between a Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide with the Face and Edge Surfaces of Molybdenite. Polymers. 2022; 14(17):3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Echeverry-Vargas, Luver, Darwin Estrada, and Leopoldo Gutierrez. 2022. "Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Interactions between a Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide with the Face and Edge Surfaces of Molybdenite" Polymers 14, no. 17: 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop