Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Study on the Performance of Waste HDPE and LDPE Modified Asphalt Binders for Construction of Asphalt Pavements Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Subcritical Water as Pretreatment Technique for Bioethanol Production from Brewer’s Spent Grain within a Biorefinery Concept
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Bending Properties for 3D-Printed Carbon Fibre/Epoxy Composites with Several Processing Parameters Using ANN and Statistical Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review on the Modification of Cellulose and Its Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/polym14173671
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Efficient Reaction Systems for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion to Furan Derivatives: A Minireview

by
Xiaofang Liu
1,†,
Dayong Yu
1,†,
Hangyu Luo
1,
Can Li
1,* and
Hu Li
2,*
1
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Rare Animal and Economic Insects of the Mountainous Region, College of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Guiyang University, Guiyang 550005, China
2
State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide & Agricultural Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide & Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, State-Local Joint Laboratory for Comprehensive Utilization of Biomass, Center for Research & Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2022, 14(17), 3671; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173671
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 4 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Conversion and Green Chemistry in Polymer Science)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lignocellulosic biomass as abundant, renewable, and sustainable carbon feedstock is an alternative to relieve the dependence on fossil fuels and satisfy the demands of chemicals and materials. Conversions of lignocellulosic biomass to high-value-added chemicals have drawn much attention recently due to the high availability of sustainable ways. This minireview surveys the recent trends in lignocellulosic biomass conversion into furan derivatives based on the following systems: (1) ionic liquids, (2) deep eutectic solvents, and (3) biphasic systems. Moreover, the current challenges and future perspectives in the development of efficient routes for lignocellulosic biomass conversion are provided.

1. Introduction

The sustainable growth of fossil fuels and fossil-fuel product consumption has caused serious environmental issues, appealing to exploited renewable and eco-friendly sources as an alternative to overcome the depletion. The world energy requirement is predicted to enhance by 24% by the year 2040 based on the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) projection [1]. Therefore, the transformation of lignocellulosic biomass to various platform chemicals has been recognized as the best candidate to cater to the urgent demand due to the abundant reserves. For a long time, physical, biological, chemical, and combined approaches have been explored to convert lignocellulosic biomass into useful products, forming the roadmap of biorefinery technologies [2,3,4]. The utilization of lignocellulosic biomass is blocked by the degree of crystallization and polymerization of cellulose, existence of hemicellulose and lignin, degree of acetylation of hemicellulose, and so on. The major obstacles are mainly due to the crystalline nature of cellulose embedded in a matrix of hemicellulose and lignin, which is determined by the reaction system combined with various catalysts.
Many researchers have focused on pretreatment methods that single, two-stage or multi-stage approaches might provide better and more efficient strategies for oxygen-containing biomass, including cellulose, hemicellulose, and their monomers or derivatives conversion, during which hydrolysis, dehydration/alkylation, and hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) reaction processes have occurred. Single-step means require more energy consumption and lead to a range of environmental issues that restrict the production of biofuels. On the contrary, two- or multi-stage process tactics use mild reaction conditions that economize and elevate the productivity of the various lignocellulosic biomasses (Table 1).
Owing to the consideration of cost, a green and sustainable reaction medium is regarded as a crucial factor to be investigated. Herein, this minireview aims to concisely summarize the performance of the ionic liquids (ILs), deep eutectic solvents (DESs), and biphasic systems in the catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for the preparation of different biofuels, especially furan derivatives by cost-effective means. The lignin upgrading for significant platform molecules is not the aim of this minireview. The new development that promotes the utilization of biomass is given in this minireview.

2. Structural Composition of Lignocellulosic Biomass

As the only renewable carbon-based resource, biomass was recognized as both energy and raw materials; more than 120 billion tons every year are produced on a global scale, equalling 2.2 × 1021 J of energy [5]. Biomass derived from various raw sources consists of 30–60% cellulose, 20–40% hemicellulose, and 15–25% lignin [6]. These resources contain sugar cane bagasse, switchgrass, rice straw, corn stover, corn cobs, nutshells, grasses, wheat straw, and so on.
Lignocellulose is composed of three main components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin; in addition, small amounts of pectins and proteins are present in it. The existence of cellulose and hemicellulose in lignocellulosic biomass draws much attention; unfortunately, lignin usually encloses in or protects them, resulting in the formation of crosslinkages [7] and the recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass. As cellulose consists of glucose monomers linked with β-1,4-glycosidic bonds and makes up the largest fraction of lignocellulose [8], the hydrolysis of which can release glucose. The second predominant component is hemicellulose, which consists of C5 sugars such as glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose, and arabinose [9], the amorphous polymer of which is xylan [10]. Unlike cellulose, the structure of hemicellulose is amorphous [11]. Hence, it is the least thermo-chemically stable constituent of lignocellulose [7] and is not isolated, different from cellulose. Cellulose and hemicellulose are the most frequently introduced biomass raw material to produce furan derivatives [12,13]. Lignin is a complicated, three-dimensional amorphous, and robust biopolymer [14], consisting of phenylpropane units, derived from sinapyl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and p-coumaric alcohol [15]. The structure of lignin is complicated and can differ depending on the species [16,17], temperature [18,19], and environmental history of biomass resources [20,21] (Table 2).

3. Efficient Solvent Systems for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion

For non-edible feedstock, lignocellulosic biomass as the primary resource has drawn much attention to produce biofuels, which is extremely significant due to the potential to reduce the environmental and geopolitical impacts caused by fossil fuels. Among the biofuels, various furanic derivatives, such as HMF and 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF), as important platform molecular appear in the “TOP 10 + 4” depicted by the US Department of Energy. These TOP molecules can act as feedstock for the synthesis of valorization products, containing fuel additives, polymer monomers, solvents, and other chemicals.

3.1. Ionic Liquid System

As a type of significant and green solvent, ILs have drawn increasing attention for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to chemicals and biofuels [22,23,24,25] because of the characteristics of designability and recyclability [26,27,28]. Large organic cations and inorganic or organic anions make up the low melting point, high thermal and chemical stability, and easy separation liquid phase [29]. Application of ILs has devoted contributions to the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass [30,31,32,33,34,35,36] since Rogers’ group announced dissolving cellulose in [C4mim]Cl in 2002 [30], which deeply vitalized their introductions for marine biomass. Among reaction processes, ILs enhanced catalytic activities [37] by destroying the intramolecular/intermolecular hydrogen bonds of cellulose and hemicellulose.
Nargotra et al. [38] pretreated sunflower stalks with different concentrations (10–25%, w/w) of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (BMIMCl) and reported a maximum of 25% w/w, providing a higher total reducing sugars. Furthermore, at higher NaOH concentrations (>0.5%, w/v), sugar release was decreased. Nguyen et al. [39] developed the two stage of ammonia with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM] Ac), providing higher sugar yield and increased conversion of glucose with 74% cellulose recovery and 78% glucose conversion. Different acetate and chloride anion groups of ILs revealed various effects on the cell wall of Eucalyptus, emphasizing the importance of anions over the cations in the degradation process [40]. Sriariyanun et al. [41] explored combined effects of a screw press with different ILs ([BMIM]Cl, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([EMIM]Cl), and [EMIM] Ac, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([AMIM]Cl). [AMIM]Cl afforded 76% reduction sugar with enhanced saccharification, reaction time saving, and more efficiency. Zhang et al. [42] reported the application of [BMIM]Cl with various metal chlorides (e.g., CrCl3, CuCl2⋅2H2O, CrCl3/LiCl, FeCl3⋅6H2O, LiCl, CuCl, and AlCl3) for the formation of furfural. AlCl3 exhibited the highest furfural yield (77%) when xylan was used as the feedstock, and the Al3+ ionization potential was a determining factor for the excellent furfural yield. It was proposed that AlCl3 reacted with [BMIM]Cl to form [AlCln](n − 3)− complexes which weakened glycosidic oxygen atoms to hydrolyze xylan to produce xylose and also isomerize xylose as an enolate structure to dehydrated furfural. Under optimal conditions, AlCl3 combined [BMIM]Cl to yield furfural derived from corncob, pinewood, and grass, with 19.1%, 33.6% and 31.4%, respectively.
To take advantage of the dissolving abilities of ILs and their strong acidic nature, Brønsted acidic ILs (BAIL) such as [C3SO3HMIM][HSO4], [C3SO3HMIM][PTS], and [C3SO3HMIM][Cl] were developed to act as solvent and catalyst. Particularly, [C3SO3HMIM][HSO4] facilitated the hydrolysis of hemicellulose, showing higher sugar yields and furfural yields of up to 85% from beechwood because of the ion–dipole interactions between [C3SO3HMIM][HSO4] and hemicellulose and the higher acidity of BAIL.
Furthermore, [C3SO3HMIM][HSO4] was stable in the reaction conditions and recycled for four cycles with minimal loss of inactivity [43]. Wheat straw hemicellulose was also selectively and effectively hydrolyzed into xylose and arabinose in [EMIM][HSO4]. The yield and the recovery of pentoses from the reaction liquor afforded 80.5 and 88.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, ILs could be reused with a high yield of 92.6 wt% and recycled with negligible selectivity of hemicellulose hydrolysis [44]. Alam et al. [45] revealed the preparation of sulfonic acid functionalized BAILs using multiple cations and anions for the conversion of wood ear mushroom to HMF, demonstrating the following catalytic performance order: [BBIM-SO3][NTf2] > [BBIM-SO3][OTf] ≈ [DMA][CH3SO3] > [NMP][CH3SO3]. The obtained trend can be relevant to their proton donating ability, which is correlated with the DFT calculated values of the deprotonation energy of the BAILs, and the high activity of [NTf2]− anion is proposed for the strong electron-withdrawing properties.
Chen et al. [46] provided an effective strategy to produce methyl levulinate (ML) from aquatic microalgae duckweed. Results confirm that the infrared structure has a significant effect on its acid strength, which eventually determined the efficiency of ML formation. With the optimized catalyst [C3H6SO3HPy]HSO4, the conversion rate of duckweed was 88.0%, and the yield of ML was high, up to 73.7% at 170 °C for 5 h. Beyond that, the solvent changed from methanol to water, and the process efficiency decreased from 81.8% to 53.7%, which further revealed that the significantly enhanced performance of the solvent was devoted to the high efficiency of the in situ esterification of the LA. Wang et al. [47] investigated the Lewis acidic ILs (LAIL) such as [BMIM]Cl–AlCl3 as a catalyst for furfural formation in an H2O–GVL biphasic system. The exploration of the dissolving capabilities of ILs and the furfural yields demonstrated that corncob showed the best furfural yield with 47.96% due to the high hemicellulose content (31.79%). Results confirm that [BMIM]Cl–AlCl3 would form [AlCl4]− that affected the normal hydride shift in the xylose–xylulose isomerization process for the production of furfural.
Naz et al. [48] developed various Bronsted acidic ILs (BAILs): Bronsted Lewis acidic ILs (BLAILs), Lewis acidic Ils (LAILs), as well as organic electrolyte solutions (OES) for HMF synthesis derived from monosaccharides, polysaccharides, and even lignocellulosic composites. [C4SO3HC1Py]AlCl4 is the most efficient catalyst in converting fructose and glucose to HMF but is inefficient for cellulose and wheat husk biomass. The reason can be ascribed to the low isomerization and saccharification power of SO3H groups united with the side chain of cation, the removal of which provides 54% cellulosic conversion and 35% of wheat husk. A series of pyridinium-based ILs were investigated for efficient conversion of fructose, glucose, galactose, cellulose, and real biomass. A total of 99% HMF was obtained with [C6Py]Cl without any other catalyst from fructose in 2 h at 80 °C, catalyzed by best isomerization and saccharification catalyst CrCl3 along with [C4C1Py]Cl affording 82 and >70% yield from glucose and cellulose at 100 and 120 °C, respectively. With the same catalytic system, 20–35% HMF yield from agricultural residues, as well as dry fruit shells, were provided [49].
Despite being promising for lignocellulose biomass conversion, some disadvantages still limit the practical applications of ILs. Generally, the widespread use of choline-based ILs is because of the advantages, namely biocompatible, renewable, lower costs, and easily available. However, the acetates also exist unstably and degrade with time and temperature and volatile defects. The HSO4−-based protic ILs are well-known for their economical cost and are limited by their corrosiveness and hygroscopicity. Among the acidic ILs, the bisulphate-based ones are the most active and the small-sized cations showed better performance over the large-sized ones. Meanwhile, the synthesized ILs with SO3H as a functional group on the cation have the advantage of avoiding the drying and purification steps, which happened similarly by using the COOH functional group [50].

3.2. Deep Eutectic Solvent System

Compared with ILs, DESs have assumed favorable merits, such as high thermal stability, non-flammability, tunable physicochemical properties, availability of starting materials, superior biodegradability, easy synthesis, and good recyclability [51,52]. DESs were first introduced by Abbott and co-workers and are eutectic mixtures formed by hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) and hydrogen bond acceptors (HBAs) [53]. DESs have been applied in lignocellulosic biomass catalytic conversion, biomass pretreatment, carbohydrate product conversion, and lignin extraction and upgrading [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. DESs are mainly composed of ChCl and various HBDs, including carboxylic acids, alcohols, and amides, and are the most commonly employed in biomass processing [51,61]. Many elements influence the performance of DESs on biomass catalytic conversion, such as reaction time, reaction temperature, liquid/solid ratio, DESs type, and HBD/HBA ratio [62], among which, the type and percentage of functional groups in DESs mixture are of great importance.
Zhang and Yu [63] explored the choline chloride-citric acid (ChCl-citric acid) DES as the reaction medium and Brønsted acidic catalyst to prepare furfural. Comparing co-catalysts including AlCl3⋅6H2O, FeCl3⋅6H2O, and CrCl3⋅6H2O with no metal chloride, 51.3% furfural yield was produced from xylan with the introduction of AlCl3⋅6H2O under optimal reaction conditions. The addition of metal chlorides enhancing furfural yields is of great importance, which ascribes to the production of Lewis and Brønsted acid reaction medium. DESs facilitated the hydrolysis of xylan and Lewis acids, increasing xylose isomerization to xylulose, whereas Brønsted acid catalyzed the dehydration of xylulose to furfural. AlCl3⋅6H2O afforded the highest furfural yield because of the higher ionization potential of Al3+, which was further confirmed when no furfural was detected in the water in place of DESs under low operating temperature (100 °C). Various DESs (ChCl-urea, ChCl-oxalic acid, and ChCl-betaine) were investigated for the synthesis of furfural and HMF with lignocellulosic waste as raw materials. ChCl-oxalic acid with TiO2 afforded 9.96 wt% furfural yields compared with ChCl-urea-combined hydrotalcite (5.25 wt%) and ChCl-betaine with Na2MoO4 (8.63 wt%) for catalytic performance studies using cellulose as feedstock. The addition of water enhanced the HMF and furfural yields, which was attributed to the catalyst solubility increasing in the reaction system, while excess water (>2 mL) led to low yields for the production of degradation products. Kinetic investigation found that furfural concentrations of 0.876 g/L, 0.747 g/L, 0.470 g/L, and 0.336 g/L were derived from macauba shells, pine nutshell, carnauba leaves, and macauba pulp under optimum 140 °C, respectively. Increasing the accessibility of chemical reactions by introducing ultrasonic irradiation to break down lignocellulosic biomass explained the growth of furfural and HMF yields (14.99 wt% to 36.59 wt% for macauba pulp [64]. Rice straw was conducted by a lactic acid/ChCl–water system with HBA and HBD, demonstrating efficient breakage for the linkage between hemicellulose and lignin profit from their synergistic effect. Highs of up to 70% xylan were removed and fractionated into the liquid stream consisting of xylose, furfural, and humins. DESs could be recycled with a high yield (69%) after five times at 90 °C [65].
Experiment results demonstrate that HBDs with carboxyl groups (e.g., formic acid, oxalic acid, and lactic acid) showed more preferable performance in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment and delignification than those containing other groups (e.g., hydroxyl groups), regardless of the HBA utilized. However, the molar ratio of HBD to HBA is high to a certain extent; excellent delignification efficiency is mainly enhanced by the provided more active protons by carboxylic acids, which facilitate the proton-catalyzed cleavage of chemical linkages in the lignocellulose.
Several IL-based DESs were investigated by introducing thiourea (TU), N-methylthiourea (NMTU), glycerol (Gly), and ethylene glycol (EG) as the HBDs and four ILs, i.e., [BMIM]Cl, [EMIM]Cl, [HMIM]Cl, and [AMIM]Cl as the HBAs (Figure 1). It was found that the synthesized DESs showed good performance on the dissolution of xylan, especially for [AMIM]Cl-EG (2:1), with the best solubility of 40.4 wt% at 70 °C. To our delight, the prepared DESs emerge with great potential in the transformation of lignocellulose, and the development of DESs is a promising approach to enhancing the dissolution and conversion of biomass [66].
The hydrolysis of hemicellulose can convert to xylose or arabinose by acidic DESs, which is further dehydrated to prepare furfural by releasing three water molecules. It is critical to optimize and mediate the acidic strength of the acid catalyst/solvent for the hydrolysis of hemicellulose; the higher the pH grew closer to 1, the larger the productivity of furfural [67]. When the 1:1 molar ratio of Brønsted acidic DESs and natural acidic DESs was observed, catalyzation by choline chloride/p-toluene sulfonic acid (ChCl:p-TSA = 1:1) showed the best yield of furfural (85.4%) under pH = 1 at 120 °C for 1.5 h. Increasing the pH from 1 to 3, 51.4% furfural yield was achieved. The effect of acidity on the furfural yield was also similarly demonstrated by Cornelius et al. using choline chloride-dicarboxylate-based low-eutectic solvents.
A one-pot, two-step approach was developed for levulinic acid production derived from rice straw (Figure 2). The investigation of the effect of carboxylic-acid-based DESs (choline chloride-acetic acid, choline chloride-oxalic acid, choline chloride-malonic acid, and choline chloride-succinic acid) confirmed that choline chloride-oxalic acid DESs observing the highest levulinic acid yield (52%) by HCl at mild condition (120 °C at 10 h). The synthesis of DESs provided a renewable, low toxicity, and cheap-ingredients approach for highly efficient, reduced costs in levulinic acid preparation. This greener process has excellent potential for application to other lignocellulosic biomasses [68].

3.3. Biphasic System

Compared with a single-phase reaction medium, biphasic systems are composed of a reaction phase and extraction phase, which can shift the prepared furan derivatives from the reaction phase to the extraction phase immediately, inhibiting the degradation of production and then enhancing the target chemical’s formation efficiency. Generally, biphasic systems consisting of water and organic solvents have widely acted as the reaction medium for the synthesis of significant platform chemicals such as HMF. In this aspect, methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), butanol, and Tetrahydrofuran (THF) are the most utilized organic solvents because of their suitable partition coefficients and salts, NaCl especially is introduced to facilitate the transfer of target chemicals from the water phase to the organic phase via the salting-out effect.
Zhang et al. [69] published a furfural synthesis introducing an H2O–Toluene biphasic system with corncob as feedstock catalyzed by CrCl3⋅6H2O and NaCl. As the stronger Lewis acidity of CrCl3.6H2O compared with AlCl3⋅6H2O, CuCl2⋅6H2O, FeCl3, CoCl2⋅6H2O, and ZnCl2, a furfural yield of 14.31% was obtained. NaCl enhanced the partition coefficient of furfural in the organic phase, which limits furfural degradation, thereby improving yield. With the co-catalyst NaCl, the furfural yield observed grew to 23.88%. Similarly, Yang et al. [70] prepared furfural from various biomass including corn stover, pinewood, and switchgrass in an H2O-THF biphasic reaction medium catalyzed by the Lewis acid catalyst (AlCl3⋅6H2O) and co-catalyst NaCl. Furfural yields were achieved from 38% to 64%, suggesting the isomerization of xylose to xylulose and the subsequent dehydration to give the target molecule. The combination of NaCl, water, and organic solvent afforded excellent furfural yields derived from pubescent. The first process was the decomposition of hemicellulose, lignin, and cellulose in H2O-GVL. The water exhibited better dissolution for hemicellulose (96.5%) compared with GVL (11.5%), but no furfural was observed. Without GVL, only a 2.3% yield of furfural was achieved in comparison with 46.6% when in the presence of GVL. As no catalyst was introduced, the production of furfural through dehydration reaction was catalyzed by the acidic condition generated by the dissolution of biomass providing organic acids (e.g., formic acid and acetic acid). Consequently, dissolved hemicellulose oligomers were conducted to synthesize furfural with the appendage of THF and NaCl, with the existed GVL gained from the former step [71].
Owing to the low toxicity, biodegradability, and high partition coefficient, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (MeTHF) produced from biomass-derived furfural or levulinic acid is considered a promising alternative to THF. Meanwhile, ethyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, and isopropyl acetate were also the preferred solvents based on their performance, environmental health, and safety impacts integrally.
Except for the generally reported organic phase, AlCl3-catalyzed DESs/MIBK biphasic systems on lignocellulosic biomass for furfural and glucose were invested because of their lignocelluloses-dissolving ability and furfural production improvement of DES. The renewable DESs (choline chloride-oxalic acid) served as both pretreatment solvent and Brønsted acid catalyst. At the optimum condition (at 140 °C for 90 min), the best yield of furfural was 70.3%, and the saccharification yield was high, up to 80.8%. The AlCl3-catalyzed DESs/MIBK biphasic system pretreatment could realize the high-value utilization of lignocellulose [72].

4. Conclusions

This work summarized and discussed the latest developments on lignocellulosic biomass conversion to various molecules, especially furan derivatives in different reaction systems. Most systems are effective for biomass catalytic conversion; however, the investigations are still in their infancy and many issues hinder the further exploration and even development of the industry, as follows:
(1)
To discover an optimized and cost-effective system for lignocellulosic biomass conversion;
(2)
The research on DESs recycling and stability needs to be studied in-depth;
(3)
The thorough exploration of solvent effect mechanisms;
(4)
The commercial synthesis of furan derivatives from biomass on a large scale requires further innovation;
(5)
Assistive technologies such as supercritical CO2, microwave, and ultrasound have been introduced into the various reported solvent system; the synergistic effect should be realized effectively.

Author Contributions

X.L. and D.Y. jointly conceived the article and discussed the outline. X.L. wrote the manuscript. D.Y. and H.L. (Hangyu Luo) made preliminary revisions to the manuscript. C.L. and H.L. (Hu Li) coordinated the entire content of the manuscript and made detailed revisions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Guiyang University Multidisciplinary Team Construction Projects in 2021 (2021-xk06), the Technical Talent Support Program of Guizhou Education Department ([2022]087), the Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Rare Animal and Economic Insects of the Mountainous Region ([2018]5102), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22065004), and the Guizhou Science and Technology Foundation ([2020]1Y054).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richard, G.; Newell, D.R.; Gloria, A. Global Energy Outlook 2019: The Next Generation of Energy; Genaraton of Energy: Dallas, TX, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jing, Y.; Guo, Y.; Xia, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y. Catalytic production of value-added chemicals and liquid fuels from lignocellulosic biomass. Chem 2019, 5, 2520–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, C.C.; Dai, L.; Ma, L.; Guo, R.T. Enzymatic degradation of plant biomass and synthetic polymers. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, S.Y.; Kim, H.U.; Chae, T.U.; Cho, J.S.; Kim, J.W.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, D.I.; Ko, Y.S.; Jang, W.D.; Jang, Y.S. A comprehensive metabolic map for production of bio-based chemicals. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, N.C.; Montini, T.; Zhang, J.; Fornasiero, P.; Fonda, E.; Hou, T.T.; Nie, W.; Lu, J.M.; Liu, J.X.; Heggen, M.; et al. Visible-light-driven coproduction of diesel precursors and hydrogen from lignocellulose-derived methylfurans. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wagle, A.; Angove, M.J.; Mahara, A.; Wagle, A.; Mainali, B.; Martins, M.; Goldbeck, R.; Paudel, S.R. Multi-stage pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass for multi-product biorefinery: A review. Sustain. Energy Technol. 2022, 49, 101702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, D.; Singh, B.; Korstad, J. Utilization of lignocellulosic biomass by oleaginous yeast and bacteria for production of biodiesel and renewable diesel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 654–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McKendry, P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohammed, M.A.A.; Salmiaton, A.; Azlina, W.A.K.G.W.; Amran, M.S.M.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Hydrogen rich gas from oil palm biomass as a potential source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruiz, H.A.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Silva, H.D.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Vicente, A.A.; Teixeira, J.A. Biorefinery valorization of autohydrolysis wheat straw hemicellulose to be applied in a polymer-blend film. Carbohyd. Polym. 2013, 92, 2154–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Loow, Y.L.; Wu, T.Y.; Tan, K.A.; Lim, Y.S.; Siow, L.F.; Jahim, J.M.; Mohammad, A.W.; Teoh, W.H. Recent advances in the application of inorganic salt pretreatment for transforming lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8349–8363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mascal, M.; Nikitin, E.B. Comment on processes for the direct conversion of cellulose or cellulosic biomass into levulinate esters. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 1349–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mascal, M.; Nikitin, E.B. High-yield conversion of plant biomass into the key value-added feedstocks 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural, levulinic acid, and levulinic esters via 5-(chloromethyl)furfural. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, Z.H.; Fridrich, B.; de Santi, A.; Elangovan, S.; Barta, K. Bright side of lignin depolymerization: Toward new platform chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 614–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gillet, S.; Aguedo, M.; Petitjean, L.; Morais, A.R.C.; Da Costa Lopes, A.M.; Łukasikd, R.M.; Anastas, P.T. Lignin transformations for high value applications: Towards targeted modifications using green chemistry. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4200–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guerra, A.; Filpponen, I.; Lucia, L.A.; Argyropoulos, D.S. Comparative evaluation of three lignin isolation protocols for various wood species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9696–9705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vanholme, R.; Demedts, B.; Morreel, K.; Ralph, J.; Boerjan, W. Lignin biosynthesis and structure. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Irvine, G.M. The significance of the glass transition of lignin in thermomechanical pulping. Wood Sci. Technol. 1985, 19, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petridis, L.; Schulz, R.; Smith, J.C. Simulation analysis of the temperature dependence of lignin structure and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20277–20287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pan, Y.; Birdsey, R.A.; Phillips, O.L.; Jackson, R.B. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 44, 593–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woodcock, B.A.; Redhead, J.; Vanbergen, A.J.; Hulmes, L.; Hulmes, S.; Peyton, J.; Nowakowski, M.; Pywell, R.F.; Heard, M.S. Impact of habitat type and landscape structure on biomass, species richness and functional diversity of ground beetles. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 139, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Z.; Song, J.; Han, B. Catalytic transformation of lignocellulose into chemicals and fuel products in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6834–6880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zakrzewska, M.E.; Bogel-Łukasik, E.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Ionic liquid-mediated formation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural—A promising biomass-derived building block. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 397–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, J.; Fan, H.; Ma, J.; Han, B. Conversion of glucose and cellulose into value-added products in water and ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2619–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ramli, N.A.S.; Amin, N.A.S. Catalytic conversion of carbohydrate biomass in ionic liquids to 5-hydroxymethyl furfural and levulinic acid: A review. BioEnergy Res. 2020, 13, 693–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rogers, R.D.; Seddon, K.R. Ionic liquids-solvents of the future? Science 2003, 302, 792–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Plechkova, N.V.; Seddon, K.R. Applications of ionic liquids in the chemical industry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 123–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hallett, J.P.; Welton, T. Room-temperature ionic liquids: Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3508–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, P.; Dong, S.J.; Ma, H.H. Fractionation of corn stover into cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin using a series of ionic liquids. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 76, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Swatloski, R.P.; Spear, S.K.; Holbrey, J.D.; Rogers, R.D. Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4974–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brandt, A.; Grasvik, J.; Hallett, J.P.; Welton, T. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 550–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Li, C.; Zhao, Z.K. Efficient acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose in ionic liquid. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1847–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, H.; Holladay, J.E.; Brown, H.; Zhang, Z.C. Metal chlorides in ionic liquid solvents convert sugars to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Science 2007, 316, 1597–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rinaldi, R.; Palkovits, R.; Schueth, F. Depolymerization of cellulose using solid catalysts in ionic liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8047–8050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ren, H.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, L. Selective conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid via microwave-assisted synthesis in ionic liquids. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129, 616–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. da Costa Lopes, A.M.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Acidic ionic liquids as sustainable approach of cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass conversion without additional catalysts. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 947–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peleteiro, S.; Rivas, S.; Alonso, J.L.; Santos, V.; Paraj’o, J.C. Furfural production using ionic liquids: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 202, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nargotra, P.; Sharma, V.; Gupta, M.; Kour, S.; Bajaj, B.K. Application of ionic liquid and alkali pre-treatment for enhancing saccharification of sunflower stalk biomass for potential biofuel-ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 267, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tam-Anh, D.N.; Kyoung-Rok, K.; Se Jong, H.; Young, C.H.; Woo, K.J.; Min, P.S. Pre-treatment of rice straw with ammonia and ionic liquid for lignocellulose conversion to fermentable sugars. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7432–7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, B.L.; Xu, A.; Wang, J.J. Cation does matter: How cationic structure affects the dissolution of cellulose in ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1326–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sriariyanun, M.; Yan, Q.; Nowik, I.; Cheenkachorn, K.; Phusantisampan, T.; Modigell, M. Efficient pretreatment of rice straw by combination of screw press and ionic liquid to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2015, 49, 146–154. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, L.; Yu, H.; Wang, P.; Dong, H.; Peng, X. Conversion of xylan, D-xylose and lignocellulosic biomass into furfural using AlCl3 as catalyst in ionic liquid. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Matsagar, B.M.; Dhepe, P.L. Effects of cations, anions and H+ concentration of acidic ionic liquids on the valorization of polysaccharides into furfural. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 6137–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. da Costa Lopes, A.M.; Lins, R.M.G.; Rebelo, R.A.; Lukasik, R.M. Biorefinery approach for lignocellulosic biomass valorisation with an acidic ionic liquid. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4043–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alama, M.I.; De, D.E.; Khan, T.S.; Haider, M.A.; Saha, B. Acid functionalized ionic liquid catalyzed transformation of non-food biomass into platform chemical and fuel additive. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 123, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, Z.J.; Ma, X.Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Long, J.X. Catalytic conversion of duckweed to methyl levulinate in the presence of acidic ionic liquids. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, H.; Chen, J.; Zhu, L.; Luo, Z. Conversion of C5 carbohydrates into furfural catalyzed by a Lewis acidic ionic liquid in renewable γ-valerolactone. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3869–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Naz, S.; Uroos, M.; Muhammad, N. Effect of molecular structure of cation and anions of ionic liquids and co-solvents on selectivity of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from sugars, cellulose and real biomass. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 334, 116523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naz, S.; Uroos, M.; Muhammad, N. One-pot production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and simultaneous lignin recovery from non-food lignocellulosic wastes using cost-effective ionic liquids. Biomass Convers. Bior. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rajamani, S.; Santhosh, R.; Raghunath, R.; Jadhav, S.A. Value-added chemicals from sugarcane bagasse using ionic liquids. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 5605–5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Satlewal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Bhagia, S.; Sangoro, J.; Ragauskas, A.J. Natural deep eutectic solvents for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment: Recent developments, challenges and novel opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 2032–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guo, Z.; Ling, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Xu, F. Integration of facile deep eutectic solvents pretreatment for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis and lignin valorization from industrial xylose residue. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 265, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abbott, A.P.; Boothby, D.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K. Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids:  versatile alternatives to ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9142–9147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Paiva, A.; Craveiro, R.; Aroso, I.; Martins, M.; Reis, R.L.; Duarte, A.R.C. Natural deep eutectic solvents-solvents for the 21st century. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hong, S.; Shen, X.J.; Xue, Z.; Yuan, T.Q. Structure–function relationships of deep eutectic solvents for lignin extraction and chemical transformation. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 7219–7232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alvarez-Vasco, C.; Ma, R.; Quintero, M.; Guo, M.; Geleynse, S.; Ramasamy, K.K.; Wolcott, M.; Zhang, X. Unique low-molecular-weight lignin with high purity extracted from wood by deep eutectic solvents (DES): A source of lignin for valorization. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 5133–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Feng, Y.C.; Yan, G.H.; Wang, T.; Jia, W.L.; Zeng, X.H.; Sperry, J.; Sun, Y.; Tang, X.; Lei, T.Z.; Lin, L. Synthesis of MCM-41-supported metal catalysts in deep eutectic solvent for the conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Satlewal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Das, P.; Bhagia, S.; Pu, Y.Q.; Puri, S.K.; Ramakumar, S.S.V.; Ragauskas, A.J. Assessing the facile pretreatments of bagasse for efficient enzymatic conversion and their impacts on structural and chemical properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 7, 1095–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, G.C.; Ding, J.C.; Han, R.Z.; Dong, J.J.; Ni, Y. Enhancing cellulose accessibility of corn stover by deep eutectic solvent pretreatment for butanol fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 203, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, Z.; Bai, X.L.; Lusi, A.; Jacoby, W.A.; Wan, C.X. One-pot selective conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into furfural and co-products using aqueous choline chloride/methyl isobutyl ketone biphasic solvent system. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Florindo, C.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Quest for green-solvent design: From hydrophilic to hydrophobic (deep) eutectic solvents. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, Y.L.; Zhang, X.; You, T.T.; Xu, F. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) for cellulose dissolution: A mini-review. Cellulose 2018, 26, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, L.; Yu, H. Conversion of xylan and xylose into furfural in biorenewable deep eutectic solvent with trivalent metal chloride added. BioResources 2013, 8, 6014–6125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. da Silva Lacerda, V.; L’opez-Sotelo, J.B.; Correa-Guimar~aes, A.; Hern’andez-Navarro, S.; S’anchez-Bascones, M.; Navas-Gracia, L.M.; Martín-Ramos, P.; P’erez-Lebe~na, E.; Martín-Gil, J. A kinetic study on microwave-assisted conversion of cellulose and lignocellulosic waste into hydroxymethylfurfural/furfural. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 180, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, A.L.; Hou, X.D.; Lin, K.P.; Zhang, X.; Fu, M.H. Rice straw pretreatment using deep eutectic solvents with different constituents molar ratios: Biomass fractionation, polysaccharides enzymatic digestion and solvent reuse. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2018, 126, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Z.K.; Shen, X.J.; Chen, J.J.; Jiang, Y.Q.; Hu, Z.Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, L. Lignocellulose fractionation into furfural and glucose by AlCl3-catalyzed DES/MIBK biphasic pretreatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yu, H.T.; Xue, Z.M.; Lan, X.; Liu, Q.L.; Shi, R.F.; Mu, T.C. Highly efficient dissolution of xylan in ionic liquid-based deep eutectic solvents. Cellulose 2020, 27, 6175–6188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Arora, S.; Gupta, N.; Singh, V. pH-Controlled Efficient conversion of hemicellulose to furfural using choline-based deep eutectic solvents as catalysts. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 3953–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.; Hu, Q. Synthesis of furfural from d-xylose and corncob with chromium chloride as catalyst in biphasic system. Asian J. Chem. 2014, 26, 1717–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, Y.; Hu, C.W.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Synthesis of furfural from xylose, xylan, and biomass using AlCl3⋅6H2O in biphasic media via xylose isomerization to xylulose. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Luo, Y.; Li, Z.; Zuo, Y.; Su, Z.; Hu, C. A simple two-step method for the selective conversion of hemicellulose in pubescens to furfural. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8137–8147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hak, C.; Panchai, P.; Nutongkaew, T.; Grisdanurak, N.; Tulaphol, S. One-pot levulinic acid production from rice straw by acid hydrolysis in deep eutectic solvent. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 03671 g001 550
Figure 1. IL-based DESs were developed for highly efficient dissolution of xylan.
Figure 1. IL-based DESs were developed for highly efficient dissolution of xylan.
Polymers 14 03671 g001
Polymers 14 03671 g002 550
Figure 2. Reaction pathway of levulinic acid synthesis from lignocellulose.
Figure 2. Reaction pathway of levulinic acid synthesis from lignocellulose.
Polymers 14 03671 g002
Table
Table 1. Single, two-stage or multi-stage approaches.
Table 1. Single, two-stage or multi-stage approaches.
AdvantagesDisadvantages
Single-stageEasy to handleLonger residence time, higher energy
consumption, low yield, corrosion,
failure to industrialize
Two-stageFast reaction rate, moderate yieldPartial not green, tedious industrialize
Multi-stageReduced sugar degradation, improved sugar yields, require less energyHard to manipulate
Table
Table 2. Components of lignocellulosic biomass and the derived furanic derivatives and others production.
Table 2. Components of lignocellulosic biomass and the derived furanic derivatives and others production.
ComponentMonomerReactionFuranic Derivatives and Others
CelluloseGlucoseFermentationH2, ethanol, lactic acid, succinic acid, acetic acid
HemicelluloseGlucose, xylose, mannose, galactose, and arabinoseHydrolysisReducing sugars
HydrogenationXylitol, sorbitol
LigninConiferyl, p-coumaryl,
sinapyl alcohol		IsomerizationFructose, xylulose
Dehydration5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), furfural, 2,5-bishydroxymethylfuran, γ-valerolactone (GVL)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Yu, D.; Luo, H.; Li, C.; Li, H. Efficient Reaction Systems for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion to Furan Derivatives: A Minireview. Polymers 2022, 14, 3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173671

AMA Style

Liu X, Yu D, Luo H, Li C, Li H. Efficient Reaction Systems for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion to Furan Derivatives: A Minireview. Polymers. 2022; 14(17):3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xiaofang, Dayong Yu, Hangyu Luo, Can Li, and Hu Li. 2022. "Efficient Reaction Systems for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion to Furan Derivatives: A Minireview" Polymers 14, no. 17: 3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop