Next Article in Journal
Hypothermic Storage of 3D Cultured Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Regenerative Medicine Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Investigation on Improved Aerodynamic and Acoustic Performance of Abnormal Rotors by Bionic Edge Design and Rational Material Selection
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Amphiphilic Polymer Conetwork Gel Films Based on Tetra-Poly(ethylene Glycol) and Tetra-Poly(ε-Caprolactone)

1
Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 8, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
2
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung, Dresden e.V, Hohe Str. 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
3
Organic Chemistry of Polymers, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(13), 2555; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132555
Received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Networks)

Abstract

:
The preparation and investigation of gel films from a model amphiphilic polymer conetwork (ACN) grant a deeper control and understanding of the structure–property relationship in the bulk phase and at the interface of materials with promising applications. In order to allow the simultaneous transport of hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances, polymeric networks with finely distributed hydrophilic and hydrophobic components are very suitable. When designing new soft materials such as coatings, in addition to the structure in the bulk phase, the structure at the interface plays a critical role. In this study, two alternating tetra-arm star polymers poly(ε-caprolactone) (tetra-PCL-Ox) and amino-terminated poly(ethylene glycol) (tetra-PEG-NH2) form an amphiphilic polymer conetwork. The correlation between different synthesis strategies for gel films of this ACN model system and their resulting properties will be described. Through various spin coating techniques, control over film thickness and roughness is achievable and highlights differences to macroscopic gel samples. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements reveal the effect of solvents of different polarities on the swelling ability and surface structure. This correlates with AFM investigations of the mechanical properties on ACN gel films, demonstrating a strong effect on the resulting elastic modulus E, depending on the presence or absence of a good solvent during synthesis. Furthermore, a higher E modulus is obtained in the presence of the selective solvent water, compared to the non-selective solvent toluene. This observation is explained through selective swelling of the tetra-arm star polymers displaying a different hydrophobicity.

1. Introduction

Amphiphilic polymer conetworks (ACN) consist of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer building blocks, forming a three-dimensional network [1]. They contain finely dispersed hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas within the network. Through the addition of aqueous or organic solvents, the swelling behavior of areas with corresponding hydrophobicity can be selectively manipulated [1,2,3]. This macroscopic and microscopic change in structure has a significant impact on the transport and diffusion of materials through the network. This behavior is leveraged in soft contact lenses, which is the main industrial application of ACNs [4,5,6]. Further applications involve membranes for fuel cells, sensors, switchable systems for cell cultures, and antimicrobial coatings [7,8,9,10,11]. All of these applications require precise knowledge of the nano- and microscopic structures, as well as the resulting properties in various environments. The mechanical and rheological properties are not only a result of the initial synthesis conditions, but also greatly influenced by partial and selective swelling of ACNs. In order to create tailored polymer networks that exhibit desired mechanical and transport properties, the network structure has to be fully controlled. A model system with a defined mesh structure and network topology is a good starting point to fully understand the structure–swelling–mechanics relationship.
There are viable synthesis strategies to obtain ACNs; however, obtaining networks with defined structures either proves difficult [1] or certain criteria for model networks remain unmet [12,13]. Sakai et al. [14] demonstrated a promising pathway to control polymer network structures and minimize network defects. Through the hetero-complementary coupling of two orthogonal functionalized, four-arm polyethylene glycol stars (A4- and B4-type tetra-PEG), they created a type of model polymer network. This built upon previous works that use PEG in amphiphilic polymer networks [15] and three-arm polymer stars [16]. The use of star-type polymers has the potential to basically create a preprogrammed molecular network structure, which is determined by the number of arms at the junctions and the length of polymer chains in between. The different end group functionalization prevents one star-type to form bonds with stars of its own type, as well as connections of arms within one star. Ideally, the two star-types bind interchangeably and a network with a defined number of chain segments in all directions is formed. Scattering experiments [17,18,19], low-field NMR [20], and computer simulations [21] suggest that there are hardly any network inhomogeneities and only a low amount of connectivity errors, resulting in controllable mechanical properties. One shortcoming in these model systems is the presence of some network defects that derive from multiple arm connections between neighboring stars. This results in pending chains and finite loops that can influence mechanical properties [20,22]. A comprehensive book about ACNs regarding issues ranging from synthesis, properties, modelling, and applications has been provided by Patrickios, C.S. (Ed) [23].
A better control over the network structure and transfer of tetra-polymer type stars to amphiphilic polymer conetworks has recently been offered by Bunk et al. [24]. The network formation is based on the hetero-complementary coupling of hydrophilic and hydrophobic star polymers. The hydrophilic star is composed of an amine end group functionalized tetra-PEG-NH2. The hydrophobic star is composed of oxazinone-terminated poly-ε-caprolactone (tetra-PCL-Ox). Bond formation between two adjacent stars of opposing hydrophobicity is ensured through the reaction of the oxazinone and the amino terminal groups (Figure 1). The advantage of this reaction lies in the great selectivity and control of reaction kinetics, which can be influenced by the variation in concentrations of starting polymers as well as temperature or solvent type. Careful manipulation of these parameters offers great opportunities for a well-defined formation of ACNs.
Great potential for the applications of ACNs can be found in coatings. In addition to the structure in the bulk phase, the structure at the interface plays an important role. This is of special interest when dealing with amphiphilic polymers since their differences in chemical nature can result in a multitude of different structures depending on the environment. Permeability of the material at the interface is one major consideration and depends strongly on the composition of the near-surface region. Methods for investigating surfaces involve atomic force microscopy (AFM), small-angle X-ray scattering, or small-angle neutron scattering under grazing-incidence (GIXAXS, GISANS). These methods allow the investigation of surface topologies that derive from nano- and microphase separations.
The structure of block copolymers or polymer blends in selective solvents has been investigated with interface-sensitive methods in the past [25,26]. Nano-and microphase separations at the interface can be visualized by AFM characterization, allowing for the calculation of spectral densities and characteristic lengths. Ivan et al. identified components and length scales of the nanophase separation in PHEMA-l-PIB by AFM imaging [27]. Fodor et al. demonstrated the effect of different mixing ratios and molar masses ratios in PVIm-l-PTHF, while categorizing the resulting nanophase separation in the context of possible morphologies in amphiphilic conetworks [28]. In situ changes in morphology while changing external parameters were observed using GISAXS [29]. The importance of distinguishing between bulk and surface structure was highlighted by Guzman et al. [30,31], who demonstrated that gels from copolymers with a hydrophilic backbone and hydrophobic side chains form a hydrophobic layer at the surface during thin film formation. This hydrophobic layer serves as a barrier for solvent transport in the network. On the contrary, Kamata et al. only observed a homogenous shrinking for ACNs, composed of tetra-PEG and tetra-PEGE, during heating [32]. No indication of changes in surface structure was observed. Other studies show that the polymer–air interface is not the only interface influencing structural changes. Bruns et al. investigated the nanophase separation in films and membranes of ACNs (PDMS and 2-Hydroethylacrlyat), where the surface structure was influenced by the chemical nature of the substrate during network formation [33]. In addition, swelling behavior and type of phase separation highly depend on the composition. Reorganization of the network structure occurred when comparing dry and swollen gels. At this point, it is not entirely clear which conditions lead to the formation of a hydrophobic surface layer that varies structurally from the bulk phase. Furthermore, the influence of all barriers in the system and their influence on micro- and nanophase separation is not fully understood.
Preparation conditions for thin films have a potentially great impact on the structure at interfaces. Therefore, synthesis conditions must be controlled precisely. Thin film preparation techniques vary depending on the polymer type. Layer-by-layer methods [34,35,36,37], grafting-from-methods [38], or adsorption techniques [39,40] are suitable to prepare stable coatings of polyelectrolyte multilayers, polymer brushes, and microgels, respectively. Other common techniques to obtain thin gel films are dip coating and spin coating. The influence of various parameters during the spin coating process has been studied in detail by Riegler and coworkers [41,42,43].
The above-mentioned techniques result in the formation of thin gel films. Similar to the bulk phase, the structure, swelling behavior, and the mechanical properties are closely related. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) offers the ability to investigate and interpret all of these features in close proximity at the interface. A comprehensive overview regarding the determination of elastic properties of materials was provided by Butt et al. [44]. The corrections of the Hertz model, which is necessary to interpret AFM results, was developed by Dimitriadis et al. [45]. Challenges arising from variations in sample properties, such as the thickness of the material, can influence results drastically [46]. Additionally, the geometry of the indenter, which is used to perform elastic measurements, can also have a great impact on the calculations [44]. For homogeneous samples, the use of micrometer-sized colloidal probes is beneficial and easy to model. Samples with heterogeneity require the use of nm-sized AFM tips that complicate evaluations substantially [47]. However, AFM tips allow for a high lateral resolution. Surface topology and mechanical properties can be determined in close proximity with resolutions <10 nm, as has been demonstrated in the case of PNIPAM microgels [40,48]. Differences in elasticity hinted towards a heterogenic gel structure. Furthermore, when the crosslinker content in PNIPAM microgels is increased, the elastic modulus increases as well [40]. AFM measurements with high spatial resolution clearly revealed the impact on the mechanical properties of PNIPAM gels when homogeneous and heterogeneous gels were compared [49].
With regard to the amphiphilic polymer conetworks investigated in this work, AFM offers a high degree of sample knowledge in terms of surface structure, swelling behavior and mechanical properties. The synthesis, swelling behavior, and structure of bulk gels of the model amphiphilic polymer conetwork, containing interchangeably connected tetra-arm stars tetra-PCL and tetra-PEG, have recently been investigated by Bunk et al. [24]. However, the goal of this study is to gain a deep understanding of the structure–swelling–mechanics relationship at the interface of these gels. Therefore, the emphasis is to find a suitable preparation technique for thin gel films of ACNs. For comparison, a macroscopic gel film (thickness ~ mm) serves as a reference interface, whose structure should not vary from the interface of the bulk phase. Control of surface morphology, roughness, film thickness, and customized sample stiffness and elasticity is highly desirable. Given its high resolution, atomic force microscopy (AFM) serves as the main tool for surface analysis to evaluate the influence of various synthesis protocols or different chemical environments gel films are subjected to.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Sulfuric acid (100%) and hydrogen peroxide (30%) were purchased from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). 3-amino-propyltriethoxysilane (99%) (APTES) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Toluene (99.7%) was purchased from Honeywell (Hamburg, Germany). Milli-Q water with a resistance of 18 MΩcm was produced in an in-house Milli-Q-system from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Synthesis of Amine-Terminated Tetra-PEG (Tetra-PEG-NH2) and 2-(4-Nitrophenyl) Benzoxazinone-Terminated Tetra-PCL (Tetra-PCL-Ox)

Both amine-terminated star-shaped poly(ethylene glycol) (MW = 10 kg mol−1) and 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-benzoxazinone-terminated tetra-arm star-shaped poly(ε-caprolactone) (MW = 10 kg mol−1) were prepared by procedures previously established by Bunk et al. [24].

2.3. Preparation of Substrates

2.3.1. Silicon or Glass Substrates

Silicon wafers from Siegert Wafer (Aachen, Germany) and glass slides from LABSOLUTE (Geyer GmbH, Renningen, Germany) were cleaned thoroughly in acetone, isopropanol, and Milli-Q water and subsequently etched in piranha solution (3:1 H2SO:H2O2) for 20 min. After rinsing with Milli-Q water, substrates were dried in a stream of nitrogen gas.

2.3.2. Amino-Functionalized Substrates

Silicon wafers from Siegert Wafer (Aachen, Germany) or glass substrates were silanized with 3-amino-propyltriethoxysilane (APTES) similarly to established procedures [50,51]. In short, substrates were cleaned thoroughly in acetone, isopropanol, and Milli-Q water and subsequently etched in piranha solution (3:1 H2SO:H2O2) for 20 min. After rinsing with Milli-Q water, substrates were dried in a stream of nitrogen gas. The clean substrates were immersed in APTES-toluene solution (10 v%) and kept for 2 h at room temperature. Afterwards, substrates were washed with toluene to remove excess APTES and dried in a stream of nitrogen gas. Substrates were pre-heated to 60 °C in an oven and immediately used for the following coating procedures.

2.4. Preparation of ACN Gel Films

All ACN gel samples were prepared from stock solutions of the tetra-arm star polymers tetra-PCL-Ox and tetra-PEG-NH2, respectively. The polymers were dissolved individually at a concentration of 70 mg/mL in toluene at 60 °C for 30 min. The ACN reaction was initiated by mixing both solutions in equimolar ratio (for details see Ref. [24]). The solution was stirred for 20 min at 60 °C and at that point further processed into thin films or thicker samples before gelation could occur (after around 30 min).

2.4.1. Preparation of Thin ACN Gel Films

Thin films of ACNs were prepared by spin coating with a spin coater from SETCAS LLC (California, USA). After mixing equimolar aliquots of the tetra-arm stars stock solutions and a reaction time of 20 min at 60 °C, 200 µL of the reaction mixture was spin coated onto chemically modified silicon wafers (preheated to 60 °C). Spin coating procedures were carried out at rotation speeds of 500–7000 rpm for 1 min, either through static or dynamic spin coating. For static spin coating, the reaction mixture was pipetted onto a silicon wafer before initiation of rotation. For dynamic spin coating, the reaction mixture was pipetted quickly onto a silicon wafer that had already been accelerated to the desired rotation speed. The coated wafers were afterwards kept in an oven at 60 °C overnight to finalize the reaction. Samples were dried in a vacuum oven before analysis.

2.4.2. Preparation of Bulk ACN Gel Films

After the initial ACN mixture had reacted at 60 °C for 20 min, the solution was poured into a mold onto a chemically modified glass or silicon substrate and sealed in an airtight Teflon vessel to prevent further evaporation. The samples were kept in an oven at 60 °C overnight to finalize the reaction. Samples were dried before analysis.

2.5. AFM

ACN gel films were characterized with atomic force microscopy (AFM). AFM measurements were carried out at ambient conditions on either the MFP 3D SA or Cypher (both, Asylum Research/Oxford Instruments, Wiesbaden, Germany). First, AFM was used in tapping mode to obtain information about surface topographies of ACN gel films. The cantilevers AC160TS-R3 (300 kHz, 26 N m−1) were used for scanning dried samples in ambient conditions, while the cantilevers AC240TS-R3 (70 kHz, 2 N m−1) were used for scanning samples in water or toluene. Both were purchased from Asylum Research/Oxford Instruments, Wiesbaden, Germany. Secondly, AFM was used in static force measurements. Cantilevers were chosen to best match the elasticity of the sample. The cantilevers NSC18 (75 kHz, 2.8 N m−1) were used for samples exhibiting elastic moduli in the low MPa region, the cantilevers CSC37/No Al (20 kHz, 0.3 N m−1) for elastic moduli between 100–1000 kPa, and CSC38/No Al (10 kHz, 0.03 N m−1) for elastic moduli smaller than 100 kPa. All cantilevers for indentation measurements were fabricated by MikroMasch and purchased from NanoAndMore, Wetzlar, Germany.
Film roughness and film thickness were determined through the analysis of surface topographies. The roughness of a recorded 20 × 20 µm2 image was determined using the built-in software features of IGOR 6.37 (15.09.112, Asylum research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Images were recorded from at least three-fold repetitions of all preparation conditions. A 20 × 20 µm2 image close to the center of each sample was chosen for evaluation. Randomly chosen locations with a box size of 1 × 1 µm2 on any recorded image were evaluated and averaged against results from repeated experiments to obtain roughness values and standard deviations. The thickness of a film was determined by scratching the sample close to the center of the substrate with a sharp scalpel and scanning at least two different 50 × 50 or 70 × 70 µm2 areas along the cut. The silicon wafer surface and the polymer gel surface were easily distinguishable and the height differences of both surfaces yielded the film thickness. At least three different randomly chosen locations on each recorded image were chosen to obtain film thicknesses. Experiments were repeated at least three-fold to obtain the average film thickness and standard deviation.
Elastic moduli were obtained through static force measurements by recording force maps (100 measurements across a 20 × 20 µm2 area) at a minimum of two sample locations on any given sample. Force curves were recorded with an indentation depth up to a maximum of 500 nm and fitted for consistency up to 200 nm using the Hertz model [52], via the AFM in-built software features of IGOR 6.37 (15.09.112, Asylum research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). All elastic moduli determinations were based on a Poisson ratio of 0.5. Samples were obtained from at least three-fold repetitions of each experiment. Force maps recorded on each sample were used to obtain a distribution of elastic moduli, as well as the average elastic moduli and standard deviations.

3. Results

3.1. Challenges of ACN Gel Film Preparation

The bulk reaction, followed up by pouring the reaction mixture into a mold, resulted in the formation of a thick gel film. Gel films were dried under vacuum to investigate their structural changes and swelling behavior after the addition of solvents of different polarity. Upon addition of the selective solvent water or the non-selective solvent toluene to a dried gel film, the gel networks swell and deform macroscopically. Images and a video of a bulk gel film and its deformation during the addition of the selective solvent water can be found in the Supplementary Materials. After deposition of a water droplet, the water droplet sits on top of the gel for a few seconds, then slowly penetrates and swells the gel and ultimately deforms the gel entirely (Figure S1, Video S1). Thin films also demonstrated deformation and detachment from the substrate after solvent addition (Figure S2). In contrast, thin and thick gel films that were prepared and immobilized on amino-functionalized (by silanization with APTES) substrates did not deform when water or toluene were added. All subsequent measurements were performed on immobilized gel films.

3.2. Surface Topography and Thickness of ACN Gel Films in Ambient Conditions

AFM measurements in tapping mode were used to determine the surface topography, surface roughness, and film thickness of thin gel films on amino-functionalized silicon substrates. Figure 2 shows the surface topography of thin gel films in ambient conditions prepared via static spin coating (Figure 2a) and dynamic spin coating (Figure 2b), for spin coating speeds of 1000 and 5000 rpm, respectively. Both height and phase images are displayed. A bulk gel film is shown for comparison (Figure 2c).
The surface topography obtained from height imaging in AFM tapping mode does not reveal any major differences between prepared thin films, except for the sample prepared at 1000 rpm through static spin coating (Figure 2(a1)). Both spin coating techniques provide similar film surfaces. The surface appears to be overall homogenous with no identifiable super-structures. Phase images are analyzed to gain additional information on the surface composition. Again, there is no clear distinction between different coating techniques. However, the phase images of thin films reveal the presence of two clearly distinguishable structural domains. Phase images can provide qualitative information on the sample–tip interaction, which can be attractive or repulsive, resulting in a difference in phase shift of the cantilever oscillation. Since the ACN gels in this study have a hydrophobic and hydrophilic component, a different interaction between these components and the cantilever tip is to be expected. This makes phase imaging a useful tool to identify different domains of tetra-PEG and tetra-PCL rich or poor areas, respectively. The different phases appear as dark and bright colors in the phase images; however, at this point they cannot be correlated with tetra-PEG or tetra-PCL, respectively. All thin films obtained by spin coating result in a nanophase separation where domains of one constituent are dispersed as spheres in the other [28]. The domains are randomly distributed and do not appear in a regular lattice. The sizes of the domains are similar for all spin-coated samples with a size distribution of 300–900 nm. The interdomain distances vary between 150–2000 nm. The synthesis of bulk gel films serves as a comparison to establish the connection between bulk and surface structure. The surface topography of the bulk gel film appeared similar to thin films obtained from static spin coating at lower speeds (compare Figure 2(a1,c)), as determined by the height image, although with an overall higher surface roughness. The average surface roughness of bulk gel films under ambient conditions was 17 ± 5 nm. In contrast to thin films, the phase images of bulk gel films revealed the presence of larger structures, that appear as spheres/elongated domains [28] with sizes and interdomain distances of multiple micrometers.
Thin films were prepared at rotation speeds of 500–7000 rpm by static and dynamic spin coating (Figure 3). Thin films obtained via static spin coating exhibit an average surface roughness of 7 ± 4 nm, which is mostly independent of the rotation speed. Films prepared via dynamic spin coating exhibit an average surface roughness of 5 ± 2 nm, which is again mostly independent of the rotation speed. Static and dynamic spin coating provide a similar film roughness across the board. Cutting into thin films with a scalpel and scanning across the cutting edge allowed for the determination of film thicknesses. Static spin coating produced films with a thickness of roughly 800–900 nm depending on the rotation speed. Dynamic spin coating produced a wider range of film thicknesses from 300–900 nm, with higher rotation speeds noticeably decreasing film thickness. Dynamic spin coating at lower rotation speeds (≤2000 rpm) yielded very inhomogeneous films. The area of impact of the drop addition during the dynamic spin coating process was clearly distinguishable from the rest of the sample with optical microscopy. This resulted in a wide range of film thicknesses, depending on the measured sample spot location. The effects of the spin coating technique and rotation speed on film thickness and roughness are summarized in Table 1. The comparison bulk gel films had a thickness of approximately 1 mm. Film thicknesses of bulk films were not determined more precisely by the scratching method, since the resulting large edge exceeds the scanning capabilities of the AFM instrumentation.

3.3. Surface Topography and Thickness of ACN Gel Films against Solvents

The surface topography changes when the chemical environment of the ACN gel films is varied (Figure 4). At first, water as a selective solvent is added to dried gel films (Figure 4b). The surface topography at the gel–water interface for thin films reveals an increase in average surface roughness from 7 ± 4 nm to 35 ± 21 nm for thin films and from 17 ± 5 nm to 76 ± 27 nm for bulk gel films, respectively. The films also swell. For thin films, this is indicated by an increase in film thickness on average by a factor of 1.5, compared to dry gel samples. Film thicknesses for bulk gel samples could not be determined due to the AFM instrument limitations described above. The general structure of the gel–water interface (Figure 4b) does not vary significantly from the gel–air interface (Figure 4a), except for the increase in roughness. This observation holds true for both thin films and bulk gel films.
Secondly, the non-selective solvent toluene is added to dried gel films (Figure 4c). The surface topography at the gel–toluene interface reveals a significant increase in surface roughness from 7 ± 4 nm to 35 ± 17 nm for thin films and from 17 ± 5 nm to 66 ± 27 nm for bulk films, respectively. For thin films, the swelling ability is demonstrated by an increase in film thickness by a factor of 2.4. ACN thin films show a greater degree of swelling in toluene than in water. Noteworthy is the change in the surface structure in toluene compared to ambient conditions. Beyond the increase in roughness, grooves with depths of up to 300 nm appear along the entire gel surface. Film roughness of gel films in ambient conditions, water and toluene are summarized in Table 2.

3.4. Mechanical Properties of ACN Gel Films

AFM indentation measurements with a tip (tip radius < 30 nm) were used to determine the elastic modulus of gel films at the surface in the presence of the selective solvent water or non-selective solvent toluene. The average elastic moduli of thin gel films (tf), irrespective of preparation technique, are Etf,w = 2800 ± 200 kPa in water (w) and Etf,t = 400 ± 100 kPa in toluene (t). The average elastic moduli of bulk gel films (bf) are Ebf,w = 290 ± 80 kPa in water and Ebf,t = 93 ± 6 kPa in toluene. A summary is shown in Table 3. For all sample types, elastic moduli are displayed as a distribution (Figure 5), which is necessary due to the small tip radius. As expected, the elastic moduli of gel films in the selective solvent water are higher than in the non-selective solvent toluene. The elastic moduli of water samples also display a broader distribution of the elastic modulus compared to toluene samples. Bulk gel films exhibit a significantly lower elastic modulus compared to the thin gel films.

4. Discussion

Firstly, the preparation technique of gel films is discussed. Next, the structure of the resulting ACN gel films at the surface is evaluated. Lastly, the mechanical properties in different chemical environments are analyzed.

4.1. Preparation of ACN Gel Films

The synthesis of ACN gel films consisting of tetra-PEG-NH2 and tetra-PCL-Ox is highly tunable, since the reaction is extremely sensitive to concentration, temperature, and solvent type. This is a consequence of the different solubilities of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer starters, as well as the variable reaction kinetics of the oxazinone-amine reaction used [24]. Therefore, any deviation from established synthesis conditions has a potentially great impact on the structure of the gel film, as demonstrated by differences in one-arm or multiple-arm connections via low-field NMR measurements [24,53,54]. The approach chosen in this study allows the synthesis of thin gel films that should mimic the bulk reaction as closely as possible. The non-selective solvent toluene ensures similar solubility of both polymer starters and a temperature of 60 °C avoided all potential demixing or crystallization events, once the solvent is removed. For the thin gel formation, ACNs were pre-formed in a bulk reaction over a time period until shortly before the gelation of the ACN [24,55] to ensure similarity to the structure of bulk gels. Before gelation occurs, samples needed to be spin coated to obtain smooth thin films that allow access to surface-sensitive analyses. After finishing the reaction in an oven, thin gel films were obtained.
However, when adding the selective solvent water or non-selective solvent toluene, samples deform drastically and detach from the surface, making characterization by AFM measurements impossible. Therefore, it is necessary to immobilize gel films onto the substrate. The use of APTES leads to the amino-functionalization of silicon or glass substrates, and subsequently allows the formation of covalent linkage of the ACN gel to the substrate. The underlying chemical reaction is equal to the linking procedure of the different star polymers. The coupling agent attached to the arms of tetra-PCL can bind to the APTES-NH2-groups on the substrate surface. Gel films were successfully immobilized and do not deform after the addition of solvents.

4.2. AFM Topography of ACN Gel Surfaces

The surface topography of thin ACN gel films in ambient conditions, obtained by AFM measurements, demonstrates the influence of dynamic and static spin coating. Both techniques lead to similar surface structures and the measured surface roughness is matching closely. However, when trying to control the thickness of the resulting gel film, dynamic spin coating is a superior method in this case. Film thicknesses for dynamic spin coating almost linearly decrease with an increase in rotation speed. In our system, dynamic spin coating should only be applied with rotation speeds of 5000 rpm and higher. At lower rotation speeds, film thicknesses vary a lot depending on spot location on a given sample, as demonstrated by the high standard deviation for lower rotation speeds. Overall, gels with a film thickness of 300–900 nm can be prepared. Interestingly, for static spin coating, the rotation speed does not influence the resulting film thickness notably. This is most likely a result of the early thin film formation being the decisive factor for determining the film thickness with this ACN system. For static spin coating, the droplet of the reaction mixture sits on the substrate for a few seconds, before it is accelerated at a constant speed increase. This initial procedure is the same for all rotation speeds. As reported elsewhere [56], this creates a situation where a difference in viscosity occurs orthogonally to the substrate during the early stages of thin film formation. This means, during the early acceleration of the substrate, most of the solvent of the droplet is evaporated or thrown off the wafer creating a much more concentrated and viscous liquid closer to the substrate surface, making further removal of material impossible. The obtained data for film thicknesses suggest that this state is already reached at lower rotation speeds (500–1000 rpm). Further acceleration does therefore not decrease the film thickness anymore, independent of the final rotation speed. The thickness of the APTES layer is neglected due to it being less than 3 nm [50]. Both methods fall short in creating thin films sub 200 nm, which some surface-sensitive measurements require (e.g., X-ray or neutron reflectometry). In comparison, the bulk gel film has a similar surface structure, but a much higher surface roughness. This again highlights the importance of thin film preparation techniques, since rough samples complicate surface-sensitive measurements. The phase images in ambient conditions reveal the presence of larger domains of inhomogeneities. While the achievement of ideal networks, where each star is connected to each neighbor through one arm (single link) without homogeneities, is the model intention, Bunk et al. demonstrated that the bulk gels of these ACNs only roughly contain up to 26% single link connections [24]. Hence, multiple order connections are definitely present and may contribute to the appearance of network inhomogeneities during AFM imaging. The potential implications of interactions of the aromatic linker in these networks, and its role for the presence of aggregation should also be considered for future studies. One also has to keep in mind that ACNs in selective media could form domains enriched in one of the constituents alone due to fluctuations in the network considering the long arms of the polymers and the resulting flexibility. The presence of dispersed spherical nanodomains is observed via AFM phase imaging for all investigated thin film samples with a size distribution of 350–900 nm and interdomain distances of 150–2000 nm, while bulk samples reveal the presence of structures in the micrometer range appearing as spherical/elongated domains. The morphologies have been categorized according to the previously established description of Fodor et al. [28]. A clear identification of the domains to clarify the belongings to tetra-PEG and tetra-PCL, respectively, is not possible with the present data. However, the observation encourages further research on the morphology and identification of the conetwork’s components through AFM phase imaging. This can be achieved through the variation in starting polymer mixing ratios and different molar masses of the tetra-arm star polymers [27,28,33].
The information of phase separation at the surface of the investigated ACN gel films can be combined with the observation that water droplets sit on the dry gel surface before they slowly penetrate the gel and the water droplet spreads. One could argue the presence of hydrophobic domains at the gel–air interface that prevent the transport of solvents, as has been reported by Guzman et al. [30,31]. In contrast, toluene immediately spreads and penetrates gel films.
The swelling behavior and impact on the surface structure are investigated by the addition of water or toluene. On one hand, the addition of water leads to an increase in surface roughness and an increase in film thickness. These observations are explained by the selective swelling of tetra-PEG stars in the gel network, increasing both roughness and film thickness. On the other hand, the use of toluene results in a similar increase in surface roughness but a higher film thickness compared to water. Since toluene is a good solvent for tetra-PEG and tetra-PCL in the network, both components are subject to swelling, explaining the higher film thickness. In addition, toluene changed the surface structure significantly for both thin films and bulk films, displaying rather compact domains separated by deep grooves across the entire gel surface. The presence of these grooves is a phenomenon not yet understood and needs to be clarified in future studies. The inhomogeneities potentially deriving from multiple-arm connections or aromatic linker interactions, as highlighted earlier, might contribute to this gel behavior. Therefore, both synthesis conditions and the chemical environment during measurements might play a key role.

4.3. Nano-Mechanical Properties at ACN Gel Surfaces

AFM indentation experiments reveal significant differences in mechanical properties depending on sample and solvent type. Generally, ACN gel films in toluene demonstrated elastic moduli an order of magnitude lower than gel films in water. This observation qualitatively coincides with postulated and measured swelling behavior of ACN gel films. As discussed previously, toluene is a good solvent for both star types. Film thicknesses of thin gel films increase by a greater amount compared to the selective solvent water due to swelling. Film thicknesses of dried thin gel films increase by a factor of 2.4 in toluene and by 1.5 in water, respectively. A more swollen gel would therefore result in a lower elastic modulus, which is confirmed by our experimental results. Additionally, elastic moduli measured for toluene samples show a much narrower distribution compared to water samples. This is expected since equal swelling of both star types in toluene would potentially result in a more homogeneous structure of gels. Meanwhile, the selective solvent water only partially swells the hydrophilic tetra-PEG stars, leaving the tetra-PCL stars in a collapsed state, potentially aggregating and forming super-structures.
Another noteworthy observation is the significant difference in elastic moduli measured in thin gel films compared to the bulk gel films, again by an order of magnitude. However, the surface topography of the corresponding gels and swelling behavior do not immediately suggest any structural differences between thin gel films and bulk gels. However, thin films and bulk films do display notable differences in surface roughness. Although, considering the indenter geometry with a tip radius of less than 30 nm, as well as the statistical analysis of various sample locations, differences in sample roughness can be excluded as the main contributor to the gap in elastic moduli between thin films and bulk gels. Substrate influences can be excluded, since all thin films, independent of thickness, have comparable elastic moduli. Fitting force curves to different indentation depths (50–500 nm) does not reveal any major differences in the obtained elastic moduli. Nano-indentation measurements therefore suggest that the near-surface region exhibits similar elastic properties to the bulk phase, which could otherwise be a potential explanation for the observed differences between bulk and thin film. This magnitude of variation in mechanical properties must therefore derive from the initial synthesis conditions. The bulk gel film is synthesized entirely in the initial bulk reaction and even after pouring into a mold maintains its concentration of tetra-PEG and tetra-PCL stars, respectively. In contrast, for the thin film preparation, the solvent is almost entirely removed by spin coating after the initial 20 min reaction in the bulk. At this point, less than 50% of the end groups have reacted, according to NMR results [24]. This means that the remaining reaction takes place in a state of a melt with a much higher local concentration and lower diffusion rates when unreacted end groups try to find a matching partner. However, most importantly, different levels of the network can now interconnect, and therefore greatly reduce the overall size of the network and increase its inhomogeneities. This results in more tension in the network as well as a reduced swelling ability. When determining elastic properties, a higher elastic modulus would therefore be expected.

5. Conclusions

This study concentrates on the development of a suitable preparation technique of thin ACN gel films, consisting of a model system with four-arm tetra-PEG and tetra-PCL stars linked by an oxazinone–amine coupling reaction. The focus lies on the analysis of the structure at the interfaces of gel films and how it compares to the bulk structure. This model system should serve as a starting point to gain control and understanding of the structure–swelling–mechanics relationship at the interface. Ultimately, this would allow the design of soft gels where properties such as swelling behavior, permeability, and transport properties are tunable.
Gel films are prepared via bulk reaction followed by dynamic or static spin coating or pouring into a mold. All gel films exhibit deformation and detachment from the substrate during the addition of the selective solvent water and the non-selective solvent toluene. Preventing these phenomena is achieved by chemical immobilization onto the silica or glass substrate with APTES, therefore allowing the use of surface-sensitive characterization methods.
Surface topography, roughness, and film thickness of ACN gel films are characterized by atomic force microscopy. Both static and dynamic spin coating result in the formation of gel films with similar surface structure in ambient conditions with low surface roughness. Dynamic spin coating is the superior method for film thickness control but may result in less homogeneous films depending on the rotation speed.
All samples show an increase in roughness and film thickness during the addition of water or toluene. Samples in the non-selective solvent toluene are thicker compared to samples in the selective solvent water. This is a result of the different hydrophobicities and swelling capabilities of tetra-PEG (hydrophilic) and tetra-PCL (hydrophobic). The surface topographies reveal the presence of different structure types, potentially being a result of the aggregation of the same star species. Gel films in toluene display the formation of compact surface domains separated by grooves.
AFM was further used to evaluate the nano-mechanical properties of ACN gel films in water and toluene. The elastic modulus of samples in water is significantly higher than of samples in toluene, again confirming the higher degree of swelling of an amphiphilic network in a non-selective solvent, compared to a selective solvent. Static AFM indentation measurements reveal great differences between thin gel films and bulk films. We propose the differences arising from the preparation method. The early removal of the solvent by spin coating to prepare thin films results in a modified state that the reaction proceeds in. Molten state, lower diffusion rates, higher network tension, and interconnection of different network levels result in a much stiffer gel network.
We are faced with a dilemma. On one hand, we are dealing with a highly tunable system, where the initial concentration, temperature, and type of solvent are adjustable parameters. However, on the other hand, this highly sensitive behavior results in challenges when trying to establish comparable sample types both on a macroscopic and microscopic level. The availability of smooth thin films is of the utmost importance for surface-sensitive analytical methods. Further adjustment of preparation parameters might help to tailor the structure, swelling behavior, and mechanical properties of the ACN films.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14132555/s1, Figure S1: Swelling behavior of bulk gel film in water; Video S1: Swelling behavior of bulk gel film in water; Figure S2: Deformation of thin gel film in water.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H. and R.v.K.; methodology, K.H. and R.v.K.; formal analysis, K.H.; investigation, K.H.; resources, C.B. and F.B., writing-original draft preparation, K.H.; writing-review and editing, K.H., C.B., F.B. and R.v.K.; visualization, K.H. and C.B.; supervision, F.B. and R.v.K.; project administration, F.B. and R.v.K.; funding acquisition, F.B. and R.v.K. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was conducted as part of the research collaboration “Adaptive Polymer Gels with Model-Network Structure” (FOR2811), funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant 423768931, 423514254, and 397384169.

Data Availability Statement

All data used for evaluation in this manuscript are herein presented.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hans Riegler for discussions about different spin coating procedures. We acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publishing Fund of Technical University of Darmstadt.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Erdodi, G.; Kennedy, J.P. Amphiphilic Conetworks: Definition, Synthesis, Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kali, G.; Georgiou, T.K.; Iván, B.; Patrickios, C.S.; Loizou, E.; Thomann, Y.; Tiller, J.C. Synthesis and Characterization of Anionic Amphiphilic Model Conetworks Based on Methacrylic Acid and Methyl Methacrylate: Effects of Composition and Architecture. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 2192–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Apostolides, D.E.; Patrickios, C.S.; Sakai, T.; Guerre, M.; Lopez, G.; Améduri, B.; Ladmiral, V.; Simon, M.; Gradzielski, M.; Clemens, D.; et al. Near-Model Amphiphilic Polymer Conetworks Based on Four-Arm Stars of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) and Poly(Ethylene Glycol): Synthesis and Characterization. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 2476–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eschbach, F.O.; Huang, S.J. Hydrophilic—Hydrophobic Interpenetrating Polymer Networks and Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Networks. Adv. Chem. 1994, 239, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nicolson, P.C.; Urgen Vogt, J.U. Soft contact lens polymers: An evolution. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 3273–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Friends, G.D.; Kunzler, J.F.; Ozark, R.M. Recent Advances in the Design of Polymers for Contact Lenses. Macromol. Symp. 1995, 98, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haigh, R.; Rimmer, S.; Fullwood, N.J. Synthesis and Properties of Amphiphilic Networks. 1: The Effect of Hydration and Polymer Composition on the Adhesion of Immunoglobulin-G to Poly(laurylmethacrylate-stat-glycerolmonomethacrylate-stat-Ethylene-glycol-dimethacrylate) Networks. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 735–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haigh, R.; Fullwood, N.; Rimmer, S. Synthesis and Properties of Amphiphilic Networks 2: A Differential Scanning Calorimetric Study of Poly(dodecyl methacrylate-Stat-2,3 propandiol-1-methacrylate-stat-ethandiol dimethacrylate) Networks and Adhesion and Spreading of Dermal Fibroblasts on These Materials. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 3509–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tiller, J.C.; Sprich, C.; Hartmann, L. Amphiphilic Conetworks as Regenerative Controlled Releasing Antimicrobial Coatings. J. Control. Release 2005, 103, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ulrich, S.; Osypova, A.; Panzarasa, G.; Rossi, R.M.; Bruns, N.; Boesel, L.F. Pyranine-Modified Amphiphilic Polymer Conetworks as Fluorescent Ratiometric PH Sensors. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, e1900360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Huang, C.S.; Jakubowski, K.; Ulrich, S.; Yakunin, S.; Clerc, M.; Toncelli, C.; Rossi, R.M.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Boesel, L.F. Nano-Domains Assisted Energy Transfer in Amphiphilic Polymer Conetworks for Wearable Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Nano Energy 2020, 76, 105039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hild, G. Model networks based on ‘endlinking’ processes: Synthesis, structure and properties. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1998, 23, 1019–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lang, M. Cyclic Structures in Polymer Model Networks. Macromol. Symp. 2019, 385, 4886–4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sakai, T.; Matsunaga, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ito, C.; Yoshida, R.; Suzuki, S.; Sasaki, N.; Shibayama, M.; Chung, U.I. Design and Fabrication of a High-Strength Hydrogel with Ideally Homogeneous Network Structure from Tetrahedron-like Macromonomers. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 5379–5384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weber, M.; Stadler, R. Hydrophilic-hydrophobic two-component polymer networks: 1. Synthesis of reactive poly(ethylene oxide) telechelics. Polymer 1988, 29, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Erdödi, G.; Iván, B. Novel Amphiphilic Conetworks Composed of Telechelic Poly(Ethylene Oxide) and Three-Arm Star Polyisobutylene. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matsunaga, T.; Sakai, T.; Akagi, Y.; Chung, U.I.; Shibayama, M. SANS and SLS Studies on Tetra-Arm PEG Gels in as-Prepared and Swollen States. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6245–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Matsunaga, T.; Sakai, T.; Akagi, Y.; Chung, U.I.; Shibayama, M. Structure Characterization of Tetra-PEG Gel by Small-Angle Neutron Scattering. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 1344–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hiroi, T.; Ohl, M.; Sakai, T.; Shibayama, M. Multiscale Dynamics of Inhomogeneity-Free Polymer Gels. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lange, F.; Schwenke, K.; Kurakazu, M.; Akagi, Y.; Chung, U.I.; Lang, M.; Sommer, J.U.; Sakai, T.; Saalwächter, K. Connectivity and Structural Defects in Model Hydrogels: A Combined Proton NMR and Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 9666–9674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schwenke, K.; Lang, M.; Sommer, J.U. On the Structure of Star-Polymer Networks. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 9464–9472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lang, M. On the Elasticity of Polymer Model Networks Containing Finite Loops. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 6266–6273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patrickios, C.S. (Ed.) Amphiphilic Polymer Co-Networks: Synthesis, Properties, Modelling and Applications. In RSC Polymer Chemistry Series; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2020; No. 33. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bunk, C.; Löser, L.; Fribiczer, N.; Komber, H.; Jakisch, L.; Scholz, R.; Seiffert, S.; Voit, B.; Saalwächter, K.; Lang, M.; et al. Amphiphilic Model Networks Based on PEG and PCL Tetra-Arm Star Polymers with Complementary Reactivity. Macromolecules 2022. to be published. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Müller-Buschbaum, P.; Maurer, E.; Bauer, E.; Cubitt, R. Surface versus Confinement Induced Morphology Transition in Triblock Copolymer Films: A Grazing Incidence Small Angle Neutron Scattering Investigation. Langmuir 2006, 22, 9295–9303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Müller-Buschbaum, P.; Bauer, E.; Wunnicke, O.; Stamm, M. The Control of Thin Film Morphology by the Interplay of Dewetting, Phase Separation and Microphase Separation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2005, 17, S363–S386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iván, B.; Haraszti, M.; Erdodi, G.; Scherble, J.; Thomann, R.; Mülhaupt, R. New Nanophase Separated Intelligent Amphiphilic Conetworks and Gels. Macromol. Symp. 2005, 227, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fodor, C.; Kali, G.; Thomann, R.; Thomann, Y.; Iván, B.; Mülhaupt, R. Nanophasic Morphologies as a Function of the Composition and Molecular Weight of the Macromolecular Cross-Linker in Poly(: N -Vinylimidazole)- l -Poly(Tetrahydrofuran) Amphiphilic Conetworks: Bicontinuous Domain Structure in Broad Composition Ranges. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 6827–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Berezkin, A.V.; Jung, F.; Posselt, D.; Smilgies, D.M.; Papadakis, C.M. In Situ Tracking of Composition and Morphology of a Diblock Copolymer Film with GISAXS during Exchange of Solvent Vapors at Elevated Temperatures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guzman, G.; Nugay, T.; Kennedy, J.P.; Cakmak, M. Real-Time Monitoring of Chemical and Topological Rearrangements in Solidifying Amphiphilic Polymer Co-Networks: Understanding Surface Demixing. Langmuir 2016, 32, 3445–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guzman, G.; Nugay, T.; Nugay, I.; Nugay, N.; Kennedy, J.; Cakmak, M. High Strength Bimodal Amphiphilic Conetworks for Immunoisolation Membranes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 6251–6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kamata, H.; Chung, U.; Shibayama, M.; Sakai, T. Anomalous Volume Phase Transition in a Polymer Gel with Alternative Hydrophilic-Amphiphilic Sequence. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 6876–6879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bruns, N.; Scherble, J.; Hartmann, L.; Thomann, R.; Iván, B.; Mülhaupt, R.; Tiller, J.C. Nanophase Separated Amphiphilic Conetwork Coatings and Membranes. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 2431–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Decher, G. Fuzzy Nanoassemblies: Toward Layered Polymeric Multicomposites. Science 1997, 277, 1232–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Decher, G.; Hong, J.D.; Schmitt, J. Buildup of ultrathin multilayer films by a self-assembly process: III. Consecutively alternating adsorption of anionic and cationic polyelectrolytes on charged surfaces. Thin Solid Film. 1992, 210–211, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Klitzing, R.V. Internal Structure of Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Assemblies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 5012–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Micciulla, S.; Sánchez, P.A.; Smiatek, J.; Qiao, B.; Sega, M.; Laschewsky, A.; Holm, C.; von Klitzing, R. Layer-by-Layer Formation of Oligoelectrolyte Multilayers: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study. Soft Mater. 2014, 12, S14–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Xia, J.; Gaynor, S.G.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization of Acrylates at Ambient Temperature. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5958–5959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Burmistrova, A.; von Klitzing, R. Control of Number Density and Swelling/Shrinking Behavior of P(NIPAM-AAc) Particles at Solid Surfaces. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3502–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Burmistrova, A.; Richter, M.; Uzum, C.; Klitzing, R. Effect of Cross-Linker Density of P(NIPAM-Co-AAc) Microgels at Solid Surfaces on the Swelling/Shrinking Behaviour and the Young’s Modulus. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2011, 289, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eickelmann, S.; Riegler, H. Rupture of Ultrathin Solution Films on Planar Solid Substrates Induced by Solute Crystallization. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 528, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Karpitschka, S.; Weber, C.M.; Riegler, H. Spin Casting of Dilute Solutions: Vertical Composition Profile during Hydrodynamic-Evaporative Film Thinning. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 129, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Danglad-Flores, J.; Eickelmann, S.; Riegler, H. Deposition of Polymer Films by Spin Casting: A Quantitative Analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 179, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Butt, H.J.; Cappella, B.; Kappl, M. Force Measurements with the Atomic Force Microscope: Technique, Interpretation and Applications. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2005, 59, 1–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  45. Dimitriadis, E.K.; Horkay, F.; Maresca, J.; Kachar, B.; Chadwick, R.S. Determination of Elastic Moduli of Thin Layers of Soft Material Using the Atomic Force Microscope. Biophys. J. 2002, 82, 2798–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  46. Oommen, B.; van Vliet, K.J. Effects of Nanoscale Thickness and Elastic Nonlinearity on Measured Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Films. Thin Solid Film. 2006, 513, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Clifford, C.A.; Seah, M.P. Quantification Issues in the Identification of Nanoscale Regions of Homopolymers Using Modulus Measurement via AFM Nanoindentation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 1915–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Burmistrova, A.; Richter, M.; Eisele, M.; Üzüm, C.; von Klitzing, R. The Effect of Co-Monomer Content on the Swelling/Shrinking and Mechanical Behaviour of Individually Adsorbed PNIPAM Microgel Particles. Polymers 2011, 3, 1575–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Di Lorenzo, F.; Hellwig, J.; von Klitzing, R.; Seiffert, S. Macroscopic and Microscopic Elasticity of Heterogeneous Polymer Gels. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 698–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Howarter, J.A.; Youngblood, J.P. Optimization of Silica Silanization by 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Langmuir 2006, 22, 11142–11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiang, S.; Xing, G.; Xue, W.; Lu, C.; Lin, J.M. Comparison of Two Different Deposition Methods of 3- Aminopropyltriethoxysilane on Glass Slides and Their Application in the ThinPrep Cytologic Test. Analyst 2012, 137, 1669–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ueber Die Berührung Fester Elastischer Körper. J. Für Die Reine Und Angew. Math. (Crelles J.) 1882, 1882, 156–171. [CrossRef]
  53. Nicolella, P.; Koziol, M.F.; Löser, L.; Saalwächter, K.; Ahmadi, M.; Seiffert, S. Defect-Controlled Softness, Diffusive Permeability, and Mesh-Topology of Metallo-Supramolecular Hydrogels. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ahmadi, M.; Löser, L.; Fischer, K.; Saalwächter, K.; Seiffert, S. Connectivity Defects and Collective Assemblies in Model Metallo-Supramolecular Dual-Network Hydrogels. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2020, 221, 1900400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  55. Lang, M.; Müller, T. Analysis of the Gel Point of Polymer Model Networks by Computer Simulations. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 498–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mouhamad, Y.; Mokarian-Tabari, P.; Clarke, N.; Jones, R.A.L.; Geoghegan, M. Dynamics of Polymer Film Formation during Spin Coating. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 123513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthesis of ACNs from hydrophobic 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-benzoxazinone-terminated PCL and hydrophilic amine-terminated PEG tetra-arm star polymers [24].
Figure 1. Synthesis of ACNs from hydrophobic 2-(4-nitrophenyl)-benzoxazinone-terminated PCL and hydrophilic amine-terminated PEG tetra-arm star polymers [24].
Polymers 14 02555 g001
Figure 2. Surface topography of ACN gel films obtained by AFM. (a) Thin film obtained through static spin coating; (b) Thin film obtained through dynamic spin coating; (c) Bulk gel film. (1) Spin coating speed of 1000 rpm and (2) spin coating speed of 5000 rpm. The top row displays the AFM height images, the bottom row the AFM phase images. Ruler size: 4 µm.
Figure 2. Surface topography of ACN gel films obtained by AFM. (a) Thin film obtained through static spin coating; (b) Thin film obtained through dynamic spin coating; (c) Bulk gel film. (1) Spin coating speed of 1000 rpm and (2) spin coating speed of 5000 rpm. The top row displays the AFM height images, the bottom row the AFM phase images. Ruler size: 4 µm.
Polymers 14 02555 g002
Figure 3. Film roughness (bottom two graphs) and thickness (top two graphs) of ACN gel films as a function of rotation speed. Thin films were prepared by static (squares) or dynamic (circles) spin coating.
Figure 3. Film roughness (bottom two graphs) and thickness (top two graphs) of ACN gel films as a function of rotation speed. Thin films were prepared by static (squares) or dynamic (circles) spin coating.
Polymers 14 02555 g003
Figure 4. Surface topography of ACN gel films obtained by AFM (height image) under the respective condition. (a) Gel film under ambient conditions; (b) Gel film swollen in water; (c) Gel film swollen in toluene. The top row displays images obtained from a thin film (static spin coating, 1000 rpm). The bottom row displays images obtained from a bulk gel film. Ruler size: 4 µm.
Figure 4. Surface topography of ACN gel films obtained by AFM (height image) under the respective condition. (a) Gel film under ambient conditions; (b) Gel film swollen in water; (c) Gel film swollen in toluene. The top row displays images obtained from a thin film (static spin coating, 1000 rpm). The bottom row displays images obtained from a bulk gel film. Ruler size: 4 µm.
Polymers 14 02555 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of elastic moduli of ACN thin films (green) and bulk films (orange) in the selective solvent water (left) and the non-selective solvent toluene (right), obtained by AFM indentation with tip (tip radius < 30 nm).
Figure 5. Distribution of elastic moduli of ACN thin films (green) and bulk films (orange) in the selective solvent water (left) and the non-selective solvent toluene (right), obtained by AFM indentation with tip (tip radius < 30 nm).
Polymers 14 02555 g005
Table 1. Effects of the spin coating technique and rotation speed on film thickness and roughness.
Table 1. Effects of the spin coating technique and rotation speed on film thickness and roughness.
Rotation Speed (rpm)Film Thickness (nm)
Static Dynamic
Film Roughness (nm)
Static Dynamic
500900 ± 100800 ± 2006 ± 26 ± 4
1000890 ± 60700 ± 3007 ± 44 ± 1
2000900 ± 100500 ± 2006 ± 53 ± 1
5000880 ± 30470 ± 406 ± 36 ± 2
7000810 ± 30360 ± 409 ± 47 ± 3
Table 2. Surface roughness of thin and bulk gel films in ambient conditions, water, and toluene.
Table 2. Surface roughness of thin and bulk gel films in ambient conditions, water, and toluene.
SampleFilm Roughness (nm)
Ambient Conditions
Film Roughness (nm)
Water
Film Roughness (nm)
Toluene
Thin film7 ± 435 ± 2135 ± 17
Bulk film17 ± 576 ± 2766 ± 27
Table 3. Elastic moduli E of ACN thin films and bulk films in the selective solvent water and the non-selective solvent toluene, obtained by AFM indentation with tip (tip radius < 30 nm).
Table 3. Elastic moduli E of ACN thin films and bulk films in the selective solvent water and the non-selective solvent toluene, obtained by AFM indentation with tip (tip radius < 30 nm).
SampleEwater (kPa)Etoluene (kPa)
Thin film2800 ± 200400 ± 100
Bulk film290 ± 8093 ± 6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hagmann, K.; Bunk, C.; Böhme, F.; von Klitzing, R. Amphiphilic Polymer Conetwork Gel Films Based on Tetra-Poly(ethylene Glycol) and Tetra-Poly(ε-Caprolactone). Polymers 2022, 14, 2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132555

AMA Style

Hagmann K, Bunk C, Böhme F, von Klitzing R. Amphiphilic Polymer Conetwork Gel Films Based on Tetra-Poly(ethylene Glycol) and Tetra-Poly(ε-Caprolactone). Polymers. 2022; 14(13):2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hagmann, Kevin, Carolin Bunk, Frank Böhme, and Regine von Klitzing. 2022. "Amphiphilic Polymer Conetwork Gel Films Based on Tetra-Poly(ethylene Glycol) and Tetra-Poly(ε-Caprolactone)" Polymers 14, no. 13: 2555. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop