Next Article in Journal
Self-Assembled Silk Fibroin-Based Aggregates for Delivery of Camptothecin
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Features of Polyester-Based Materials for Medical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Self-Healing Polyurethane Powder Coating Using Diels–Alder Reaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increased Comfort of Polyester Fabrics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/polym13213806
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combining Materials Obtained by 3D-Printing and Electrospinning from Commercial Polylactide Filament to Produce Biocompatible Composites

by
Pablo Romero-Araya
1,2,
Victor Pino
1,2,
Ariel Nenen
1,
Verena Cárdenas
1,
Francisca Pavicic
3,4,
Pamela Ehrenfeld
3,4,
Guillaume Serandour
5,
Judit G. Lisoni
6,
Ignacio Moreno-Villoslada
1 and
Mario E. Flores
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Polímeros, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
2
Escuela de Odontología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
3
Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Anatomia, Histologia y Patologia, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
4
Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios del Sistema Nervioso (CISNe), Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
5
LeufüLAB, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Instituto de Diseño y Métodos Industriales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
6
Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(21), 3806; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213806
Submission received: 13 October 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 1 November 2021 / Published: 3 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyester-Based Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The design of scaffolds to reach similar three-dimensional structures mimicking the natural and fibrous environment of some cells is a challenge for tissue engineering, and 3D-printing and electrospinning highlights from other techniques in the production of scaffolds. The former is a well-known additive manufacturing technique devoted to the production of custom-made structures with mechanical properties similar to tissues and bones found in the human body, but lacks the resolution to produce small and interconnected structures. The latter is a well-studied technique to produce materials possessing a fibrillar structure, having the advantage of producing materials with tuned composition compared with a 3D-print. Taking the advantage that commercial 3D-printers work with polylactide (PLA) based filaments, a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer, in this work we produce PLA-based composites by blending materials obtained by 3D-printing and electrospinning. Porous PLA fibers have been obtained by the electrospinning of recovered PLA from 3D-printer filaments, tuning the mechanical properties by blending PLA with small amounts of polyethylene glycol and hydroxyapatite. A composite has been obtained by blending two layers of 3D-printed pieces with a central mat of PLA fibers. The composite presented a reduced storage modulus as compared with a single 3D-print piece and possessing similar mechanical properties to bone tissues. Furthermore, the biocompatibility of the composites is assessed by a simulated body fluid assay and by culturing composites with 3T3 fibroblasts. We observed that all these composites induce the growing and attaching of fibroblast over the surface of a 3D-printed layer and in the fibrous layer, showing the potential of commercial 3D-printers and filaments to produce scaffolds to be used in bone tissue engineering.

1. Introduction

Tissue engineering (TE) is devoted to restoring, maintaining, or improving tissue functionality when damage affects the tissue function. Although tissues can self-recover, the use of engineered materials, such as synthetic scaffolds, can improve this process [1,2]. In TE, the use of scaffolds can improve the function of damaged tissues by supporting cell growth and migration, providing an environment with a porous microstructure and adequate pore size distribution, showing biocompatibility and biodegradation, adequate mechanical properties, and shape stability to resist external deformation in order to maintain the integrity of the designed structure. To produce materials for TE meeting these requirements, polymers, ceramics, and metallic materials have been frequently used [3]. In addition, there are a plethora of techniques to produce materials for tissue engineering, such as freeze-drying [4,5], decellularization [6], and surface modification [7].
To mimic the natural environment found in bone, scaffolds can be made using various inorganic compounds such as ceramics and metals. One of these is hydroxyapatite (HA), a well-studied calcium phosphate derivative possessing bioactive and bioresorbable properties to formulate scaffolds for TE; due to this, the inorganic compound is one of the main components in bone tissues [8]. The molecular structure of HA can be modified to include various bioactive ions and signaling molecules. HA can be obtained from natural sources or is synthesized in the laboratory, generating materials with a similar chemical composition but a different porosity, crystal size, and microstructure [9,10]. HA is a substance that can directly bind with live bone after it has been surgically inserted into the human body in cases of bone defects, enhancing appropriate revascularization, stem cell proliferation, and bone regeneration without producing any local or systemic toxicity. Materials designed with pure HA present a limited mechanical strength for load-bearing applications, a problem that can be overcome by including HA in polymeric materials as an additive [11,12].
In this sense, non-toxic and degradable polymeric scaffolds for TE can be prepared by using PLA, acronym of polylactide of poly(lactic acid), a well-known degradable and biocompatible polymer synthesized from lactic acid or lactide, and both are obtained from renewable resources. PLA and related materials are biocompatible and biodegradable due to their undergoing a degradation processes in a physiological environment, mediated by non-enzymatic hydrolysis of the esters in the polymer backbone, generating as degradation products low molecular weight compounds such as lactic and hydroxy hexanoic acids. For instance, lactic acid is the main product obtained after degradation of PLA, which is consumed in normal metabolic pathways, and is expelled from the body in the form of carbon dioxide and water [13,14].
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a 3D-printing method that is broadly used in biomedical applications to produce bone models as well as scaffolds with a defined shape [15,16]. In FDM, a fused plastic filament is forced through an extrusion head, and it is deposited on a flat surface into a specific bidimensional pattern. The extrusion head then moves vertically, and a new layer is extruded, which is adhered to the previous deposited layer. A three-dimensional shape is obtained from the accumulation of layers. FDM 3D-printing is convenient as a scaffold fabrication technique. FDM printers are now available at a low cost, which makes them readily available to scientists and physicians. Common filaments such as PLA allows for the good control of scaffold geometry at the macroscale and provides mechanical properties similar to that of bone and other tissues [17,18]. Additionally, the FDM process does not require solvents during printing. However, FDM lacks the resolution needed to obtain functional and biomimetic scaffolds possessing multiple hierarchies of structures on the macro-, micro-, and nanoscale [19,20].
One approach to produce scaffolds for TE is the generation of materials mimicking the native extracellular matrix (ECM), a three-dimensional fibrous-like structure ranging from 10 to 100 nm, composed of a protein matrix synthesized by resident cells in equilibrium with surrounding cells and growth factors [21]. The microenvironment provided by the ECM creates optimal conditions for cell interaction, differentiation, and function [22]. Electrospinning is a suitable technique that allows the preparation of fibrous materials possessing a non-woven structure, mimicking the structure of ECM found in natural tissues [23,24]. Some studies point at the size of electrospinning fibers as influencing the differentiation of neural stem cells [25]. This technique allows the processing of liquid polymeric solutions or solid bulk polymers, allowing the tuning of the composition of the final material by blending polymers with different additives. Several biocompatible polymers are frequently used in electrospinning, such as polycaprolactone (PCL) and PLA, which are both thermoplastic polymers, among other biocompatible and non-biocompatible polymers. In addition, since the polymers are processed in liquid formulations, organic and inorganic compounds such as HA can be easily included [11].
Both techniques mentioned above can be combined to produce scaffolds possessing multiple hierarchic structures [26,27,28], taking advantage of the isolated materials combined in one composite [16]. As said before, electrospinning allows the design of materials with an ECM-like structure and a tuning chemical composition; however, materials with poor mechanical properties to be implanted in the human body are obtained. Meanwhile, commercial 3D-printers and PLA filaments are inexpensive and easy to be implemented, offering the design of materials with complex structures and adequate mechanical properties to be implanted; however, it is difficult to tune the composition of these filaments. Some studies are found in the literature concerning composite design and characterization by combining PLA 3D-printed pieces and electrospun fibers [29,30]. It is found that the addition of a layer of PLA fibers to a 3D-printed PLA piece enhances the mechanical properties of the composite.
In this work, we present the design of polymeric composites by combining PLA-based electrospun fibers supported onto PLA 3D-printed pieces with different pore geometry, in order to obtain a composite mimicking bone tissue, by possessing a porous structure provided by electrospun fibers and supported in a well-defined 3D-printed frame. First, we will describe two digital scaffold designs possessing ellipsoidal and square pore structure, and subsequently the 3D-printing of these designs using a commercial PLA filament in a low-cost commercial 3D-printer. Different PLA fibers have been prepared using recycled PLA from 3D-printed filaments and dichloromethane as a solvent, including or not polyethylene glycol (PEG) and HA as additives. The obtained fibers have been characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), wettability and tensile-test, and the influence of the composition in the final properties of these fibers is discussed. Two types of composites are obtained by combining electrospinning fibers with 3D-printed pieces. The obtained 3D-printed/electrospun composites were characterized by dynamical mechanical analysis (DMA) and SEM, and biocompatibility was tested using the simulated body fluid assay (SBF), and by culturing composites with 3T3 fibroblast cells. The influence of the composition of fibers and 3D-printed pore geometry is discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Commercial polylactide filament was used to print the scaffolds (1.75 mm diameter, Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China). Polyethylene glycol (PEG, 100.000 g/mol), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and sodium cacodylate were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dichloromethane (DCM), methanol (MeOH), chloroform (CHCl3), ethanol (EtOH), sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), potassium chloride (KCl), dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4), magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2 × 6H2O), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37 wt.%), calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2 x 2H2O), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS) were supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and used without further purification. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, 1.8 mM Ca+2) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were used to cell culture (Gibco). Deionized water was produced in our laboratory. 3T3 fibroblast cells were obtained from primary mouse epidermal cell cultures. Hydroxyapatite (HA) was synthesized following published procedures (see Supplementary Materials) and characterized by TEM (Figure S1) and SEM-EDS (Figure S2) [31,32].

2.2. Equipments

Scaffolds were printed using a fused deposition modelling process (FDM) on a commercial 3D-printer (CR-10 Max, Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China). Electrospinning was done in an apparatus consisting of a 5 mL luer-lock glass syringe (Hamilton Gastight, Franklin, MA, USA) connected to a PTFE tubing with a PEEK luer-lock connector with a flat-end 22G metallic needle, a syringe pump (NewEra Pump Systems Inc, Farmingdale, NY, USA) to control the feeding rates, a plastic plate covered with a rectangular metallic mesh, a high voltage DC power supply (Genvolt High Voltage Ind. Ltd., Bridnorth, United Kingdom) connected to the metal needle and to the ground metallic mesh. SEM images of fibrous materials were obtained in CrossBeam Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM Auriga Compact, Zeiss, Aalen, Germany). SEM-EDS images were obtained in a variable pressure SEM (PV-SEM EVO MC10, Zeiss, Aalen, Germany) possessing an X-ray microanalysis detector (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, United King). Wettability of fibrous materials was measured by the sessile drop method in a contact angle meter (HO-IAD-CAM-01, Holmarc Opto-mechanotronics PVT. LTD., Kochi Kerala, India). Thermal and mechanical properties of 3D-printed scaffolds and composites were measured using a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA 8000, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Tensile tests were carried in the fibrous materials by stress–strain tests using a texture analyzer (CT3-1000, Brookfield, Middleboro, MA, USA). Colorimetric MTT assays were performed using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Bio-MateTM 3S, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA). Simulated body fluid assay was done in a thermostated orbital shaker (WiseCube WIS-20, Witeg Laborthecnik GmbH, Wertheim, Germany).

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Computer-Assisted Design and 3D-Printing of Scaffolds

Two scaffolds with a square and ellipsoidal pore shape were designed using the Inventor Autodesk software (Adobe), and the digital designs are shown in Figure 1. The dimensions of 3D-designed scaffolds are listed in Table 1.
Obtained CAD designs were sliced in a slicer software (Creality Slicer v-4.2) and printed in a commercial 3D-printer (CR-10 Max, Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co. Ltd., China), using a commercial PLA filament (1.75 mm, white, Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co. Ltd., China). 3D-printer settings used to print the designed scaffolds are listed in Table 2.

2.3.2. Recovery of PLA from 3D-Printer Filaments

PLA was recovered from a virgin 3D-printer filament by dissolution and precipitation. Briefly, 100 g of crushed 1.75 mm filament were added to a 1 L beaker and dissolved with an excess of chloroform. After complete dissolution, the mixture was poured into an excess of cold methanol, inducing the precipitation of the polymer. The resultant mixture was filtered and dried at 30 °C up to constant mass, and then ground in a coffee grinder. The resulting polymeric bulk powder was stored in closed containers.

2.3.3. Electrospinning of PLA and Mixtures with PEG and HA

Four different recovered PLA solutions were prepared using DCM as solvent. One solution was prepared at 10 wt.% of PLA, by dissolving 800 mg of PLA in 5.0 mL of DCM. Moreover, similar solutions were prepared by adding PEG as an additive (2.5 wt.% relative to PLA mass), and HA (2.5 and 5.0 wt.% relative to PLA mass). Mixtures were prepared in 10 mL glass vials and dissolved by magnetic stirring (50 rpm) for 24 h. The preparation of electrospinning mats was done in a room with controlled temperature (20 °C) and relative humidity (40%). Prepared solutions were loaded in a 5.0 mL glass syringe and injected at a speed of 6 mL/h. An electrical potential of 13.0 kV was applied, and the distance of collector-to-needle was kept at 21 cm. A metallic mesh collector was used to collect the mats. After processing 1000 µL of solution, a fibrous mat is obtained in the collector. To evaporate the residual solvent, the obtained materials were left in a laminar flow cabinet for 24 h.

2.3.4. Composite Fabrication by Mixing 3D-Printed and Electrospinning Materials

Both 3D-printing and electrospinning techniques were combined to generate a composite. For the fabrication of the composites, 3D-printed scaffolds were cut in rectangles of 40 × 8.3 × 1.5 mm3. Next, electrospun PLA-based fibers were deposited over the 3D-print pieces by placing them over the electrospinning mesh collector. The same experimental conditions described above were applied to deposit fibers over 3D-printed scaffolds. A sandwich-like composite is obtained after adding a second 3D-printed rectangle over the electrospun 3D-print piece. Both faces were stuck by adding a layer of PLA dissolved in chloroform in the extremes of the composite.

2.3.5. 3T3 Fibroblast Culture and Morphological Characterization

3T3 fibroblast cells were obtained from primary mouse epidermal cell cultures. 3T3 cells were expanded in DMEM, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (104 UL/mL of penicillin G sodium and 104 mg/mL streptomycin sulfate, Gibco), and 1% fungizone (250 mg/mL amphotericin B, Gibco). The culture was carried out at 37 °C with 5% CO2, until sub-confluence. Morphological characterization of 3T3 fibroblasts was done by immunocytochemistry. 3T3 cells were cultured with DMEM 10% supplemented with FBS in a Lab-Teck chamber culture plate over adherent coverlips (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA) by adding 20,000 cell per well. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in CO2 atmosphere during 48 h. After that, culture media was removed from the culture plate, and the remaining cells were washed twice with PBS 1X buffer at room temperature. Washed cells were fixed by incubation in 4% paraformaldehyde solution during 20 min at room temperature and were washed three times with PBS 1X buffer. Fixed cells in coverslips were pretreated with metanol-H2O2 0.3% during 10 min to permeabilize the cells and blocked the peroxidase activity. Primary antibodies anti-Vimentin (VIM, Cell Signaling) and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, Dako) were used a dilution of 1:250 in a PBS-BSA 0.5%—saponin 0.3% buffer and incubated overnight at 25 °C in a humid chamber. After that, cells were washed three times with PBS 1X buffer for 10 min, and visualization of fibroblasts markers was done using the biotin/streptavidin-peroxidase method and visualize peroxidase activity by diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as chromogen. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. A control assay was done by omission of the first antibodies.

2.3.6. 3T3 Adhesion to Composites

A study of the adhesion of 3T3 cells to the surface of the composites was done by culturing cells in the presence of the composites. Pieces of 1 × 1 cm2 were introduced in a 24-well culture plate, then, 3 × 105 3T3 fibroblasts were seeded per well, which was maintained in 10% DMEM media supplemented with FBS. After a certain time of culturing of fibroblast in the presence of the composites (5, 10, and 15 days), both the culture medium and the composite were removed. To study fibroblast morphology, proliferation, and cell adhesion by electron microscopy, composites were gently washed two times with 1 mL of PBS buffer. Cells were fixed at 4 °C with a 2.5% v/v glutaraldehyde solution prepared in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 2 h, and then washed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Dehydration of samples was done using ethanol:water solutions (30, 60, 70, 90, and 100% ethanol content), starting from low to high concentration. A final washing was done using anhydrous ethanol. Remotion of residual ethanol was done using a CO2 critical point dryer (Hitachi HCP-2). Samples were stored in a desiccator before SEM analysis.

2.3.7. MTT Assay

The metabolic reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), was used to assess the fibroblast viability cultured in the presence of the composites, following the norms for the biological evaluation of medical products by means of cytotoxicity tests (ISO 10993-5) [33]. To carry out this assay, 3 × 105 3T3 fibroblasts were seeded per well, and were maintained in 10% DMEM supplemented with FBS. Next, the composites were introduced into the culture wells. After a certain amount of time culturing cells with the composites (5, 10 and 15 days), both the culture medium and the composite were removed from the culture plate. Then, an MTT solution (0.55 mg/mL) was added to the culture plate, leaving it in contact with the cells for 4 h. Subsequently, the formazan was solubilized in 1 mL of a mixture of isopropanol and hydrochloric acid in a ratio of 2:10 vol.%, and then the absorbance at 570 nm was measured using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Bio-MateTM 3S, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). All tests were carried out in triplicate.

2.3.8. Simulated Body Fluid Assay (SBF)

The SBF solution was prepared according to Kokubo et al. (see Table S1 in Supplementary Materials for ionic composition). Salts were dissolved in deionized water, adjusting the pH to 7.4 using 1.0 M HCl solution. The solution was filtered with a 0.22 µm cellulose filter and stored at 4 °C before use. Rectangular composites of 40 × 8.3 × 1.5 mm3 were immersed in 10 mL of SBF solution in plastic containers and were kept in an orbital shaker (WiseCube) at 36.5 °C and 50 rpm. SBF solution was replaced every 4 days with a freshly prepared one. After 30 days, composites were removed from SBF media, gently rinsed with deionized water twice, and dried in a convection oven at 36 °C for 48 h. Samples were stored in a desiccator before analysis.

2.3.9. Characterizations

PLA electrospun fibers were characterized by tensile tests using a universal testing machine (CT3-1000 Texture Analyzer, Brookfield, Middleboro, MA, USA). Wettability of PLA fibers was characterized using a contact angle meter (Holmarc HO-IAD-CAM-01, Kalamassery, Koshi, India), depositing 10 µL of water on the surface of the material. The drop was analyzed using the Image J software possessing the contact angle plugin (NIH, USA). Thermomechanical analysis of 3D-printed scaffolds and composites was done in a Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA8000, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), under dual cantilever geometry. Storage and loss modulus, and tan δ were measured in a temperature scan program from 25 to 120 °C, heating at 2 °C/min, applying a static force of 2.0 N, 1 Hz of frequency, and 0.05 mm of tension. Glass transition of PLA-based materials was assessed by tan δ maximum position in the temperature scan program. Data were analyzed by OriginPro software. The surface of the obtained materials was studied by scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM Auriga Compact, Zeiss, Aalen, Germany), by sticking a small material sample in a SEM stub using a conductive carbon adhesive tape (Ted Pella, Redding, USA). Samples were covered with a thin layer (1 nm) of gold by sputtering (Leica EM ACE 600) and were analyzed by SEM at 3.00 kV. Samples for SEM-EDS analysis were coated with a 10 nm layer of carbon (Leica EM ACE 600) and were analyzed at 20.0 kV. Changes in molecular weight distribution of PLA composites were studied by gel permeation chromatography (GPC, Jasco, Japan), equipped with a refractive index detector (RI-4030, Jasco) and a divinylbenzene-based column (DVB column, Jordi Labs) enclosed in a column oven at 40 °C (CO-4060, Jasco). Around 100 mg of the composite was dissolved in 10 mL of chloroform for liquid chromatography (Merck), keeping the samples in an orbital shaker at 37 °C for 24 h. After that, samples were filtered with 0.22 µm PVDF filters and diluted with chloroform for liquid chromatography at a 5 mg/mL final concentration. Samples were injected into the GPC running in chloroform as a mobile phase at 1 mL/min. Mass average molecular weight (Mw), number average molecular weight (Mn), and polydispersity index (PDI), were calculated using ChromNAV-GPC software (Jasco), applying a molecular weight calibration curve constructed using different narrow polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as standard (ReadyCal Kit, Polymer Standard Service GmbH).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. CAD Design and 3D-Printing

CAD is a powerful tool for the design of scaffolds with simple and complex geometries. Using CAD, we designed two types of scaffolds based on the pore shape, ellipsoidal and square, as shown in Figure 1. These CAD files were transformed into 3D-printer readable files and were printed in a conventional low-cost 3D-printer. Obtained 3d-printed scaffolds are shown in Figure 2. A piece of dimensions 40 × 40 × 1.5 mm3 were obtained. In both 3D-printed pieces, a repetitive pore shape was obtained in the whole piece, which can be used to influence the cellular aggregation and nutrient diffusion during the culture of 3D-printed scaffolds with cells [34,35], which also influence tissue formation [36,37]. In addition, the pore size of the 3D-printed scaffolds could influence cell growing, suggesting to some authors that the optimal range is between 200 and 800 µm [35,37]. In the 3D-printed scaffolds, the pore size ranged between 1000 and 1500 µm (Figure 1).

3.2. Electrospinning of Recovered PLA

PLA filament used in the 3D-printing of scaffolds was also used to prepare fibrous mats by electrospinning. Previously, a step of recovering of PLA from virgin 3D-print filaments was done by dissolution and precipitation, a simple process for recovering bulk polymers from preformed objects, taking the advantage that PLA is a polymer soluble in organic solvents such as chloroform and dichloromethane, and insoluble in polar solvents such as methanol. This methodology presents some advantages, such as the preservation of the molecular integrity of the polymer compared with other recycling processes for PLA [38,39]. Moreover, this recovery methodology can be also used to recover PLA from failed 3D-print pieces.
Recovered PLA was used to prepare different solutions in DCM as a solvent containing PLA, PEG and HA, and was processed by electrospinning, applying the conditions listed in Section 2.3. Processing pristine PLA solutions prepared at 10 wt.% forms a fibrous material (PLA10); however, a weak material is obtained after detaching from the collector. The addition of PEG (2.5 wt.% related to PLA content) to these solutions improves the formation of a well-formed material over the collector (PLA/PEG), which can be easily handled and detached, as compared with bare PLA fibers. The same trend is observed with solutions prepared with HA at different concentrations (2.5 and 5.0 wt.%), a well-formed material over the collector (PLA/PEG/2.5HA and PLA/PEG/5.0HA). The addition of PEG and HA improves the formation of fibrous PLA mats, even when the PLA concentration is low.
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of PLA electrospun mats. All the obtained materials are composed of non-woven and stacked layers of fibers with diameters around 1 to 5 µm, possessing a similar fibrous and interconnected structure to ECM. However, some differences in the fiber diameter are observed in fibers prepared with PEG and HA. PLA10 material is composed of irregular fibers of a mean diameter of 2.5 µm. Some beads are detected during SEM visualization, which is also consistent with the low handling properties observed during electrospinning of PLA 10 wt.% solution. In PLA/PEG material, a small decrease in the diameter of fibers to 2.0 µm is observed compared with PLA10 fibers. On the contrary, PLA/PEG/2.5HA materials are composed of fibers with a diameter similar to PLA10 fibers, and some small diameter fibers are observed in PLA/PEG/5.0HA materials. Interestingly, in all the obtained electrospun materials, a porous and wrinkled topology is observed on the surface of these fibers, with slight differences in the pore shape, size, and distribution according to the composition of the material. The formation of pores on the surface of electrospun fibers is postulated as a consequence of the high volatility of the solvent used to prepare the solutions (DCM), inducing the microscopic phase separation of the solutions at the surface of the ejected charged jet that occurred very rapidly during electrospinning [40,41]. Another approach to explain the formation of pores in the surface of the fibers is related to moisture condensation when an electrospinning experiment is done under humid environments [42].
Mechanical properties of obtained PLA electrospun mats were measured by tensile test, and the results are shown in Figure 4. Deformation was done up to 50% of the original length of the materials, using a patch of 4.0 cm long. PLA10 material displays a high deformation under low stress, and thus a low Young modulus is measured (0.4 ± 0.2 MPa). Materials formulated with PEG (PLA/PEG) present a Young modulus of 1.3 ± 0.5 MPa, which is stiffer than materials formulated with bare PLA (PLA10). Materials containing HA (PLA/PEG/2.5HA and PLA/PEG/5.0HA) are also stiffer than those prepared without HA, possessing a Young modulus of 1.2 ± 0.6 and 0.7 ± 0.5 MPa, respectively. A decrease in the Young modulus is observed when the concentration of HA increases to 5.0 wt.%, which is explained on the basis of HA dispersion in the PLA-based fibers. Materials formulated with a low concentration of HA allow an adequate dispersion of HA in the polymeric fibrous matrix; thus, an efficient stress transfer is observed during tensile testing. On the contrary, a high load of HA could produce an aggregation of this component in the polymeric matrix, acting as weak points [43,44].
Both PEG and HA are well-known compounds that are frequently added to polymeric material formulations to produce hydrophilic and wettable materials [24,45]. In Figure 5 is shown the contact angle of a water drop on the surface of the PLA electrospun mats. PLA is a hydrophobic polymer, producing a high contact angle of water measured in PLA10 material (128.8 ± 2.2°). A small decrease of the contact angle (121.3 ± 4.9°) is observed in PLA/PEG as compared with pristine PLA electrospun mats. The trend is also observed in PLA/PEG/HA mats, 118.7 ± 2.1° and 116.2 ± 3.0° for materials prepared with 2.5 and 5.0 wt.% HA, respectively. Although it is well-known that PEG is a hydrophilic polymer, the small decrease in the contact angle of PLA materials formulated with PEG is due to the low concentration of PEG used to prepare the fibrous materials.

3.3. Composite Design by Combining 3D-Printed Pieces with Electrospinning PLA-Based Fibers

3D-printing and electrospinning techniques were combined to produce 3D-printed/electrospun composites, consisting of two 3D-printed pieces stacked on a central layer of PLA electrospun mat in a sandwich-like structure (Figure 6). Eight materials were obtained after combining the two pieces of the 3D-printed scaffold possessing square and ellipsoidal pores with the four different PLA electrospun mats. For the composite fabrication, a layer of PLA-based fibers was deposited by electrospinning, placing a 3D-printed PLA piece in the electrospinning collector, and then another 3D-printed PLA piece was stacked on top of them. While the 3D-printed scaffolds afford good mechanical properties to the composite, the PLA electrospun mats allow tuning of the material composition. Indeed, an electrospinning deposition of PLA 10 wt.% solution over the 3D-printed PLA pieces failed, whereas it succeeds using PLA/PEG and PLA/PEG/HA solutions (Figure 6).
Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was used to study the mechanical properties of 3D-printed pieces and composites at different temperatures. This technique performs a low deformation into the material, measuring the response of the material to a sinusoidal deformation. In DMA, the modulus is the parameter used to describe the overall resistance of materials to a deformation. The elastic modulus (or storage modulus, E′) measures the elasticity and the ability of the material to store energy; the viscous modulus (or loss modulus, E″) measures the ability of the material to dissipate energy, and the tan δ (or damping factor) is calculated as the ratio of viscous to the elastic response. High values of tan δ are indicative of a high potential of the material to dissipate energy by segmental motion. The damping factor reflects the energy dissipation potential of materials [46]. In Figure 7 is shown the evolution of E′ and tan δ of PLA 3D-printed pieces in a temperature scan from room temperature to 120 °C. During the thermal cycle applied, three clear zones are observed from both E′ and tan δ, and are related to changes in molecular mobility of PLA chains in the material: glassy state, glass transition, and rubbery state, respectively. In the glassy state, the PLA molecules are forming a rigid structure, and only secondary relaxations can occur (γ and β), thus a high E′ value (>109 Pa) is observed in this zone, reflecting the glassy state of PLA at this temperature range. An increase in temperature produces an increase in polymer molecular mobility (α relaxations), and is marked by a considerable drop in the E′ observed in a narrow range of temperatures, also appearing at well-defined tan δ peaks in this temperature range. In addition, tan δ is frequently used to measure the glass transition (Tg) of polymers in DMA experiments [47,48]. In our assays, the Tg of PLA used in 3D-printing is 67–68 °C, similar to reported values applying the same measurement conditions [49,50]. In the rubbery state, all PLA macromolecules have enough mobility to form crystalline domains, then a small increase in the E′ is observed over 90 °C, related to the cold-crystallization of PLA [51,52].
The E′ at room temperature (25 °C) was measured from DMA for the composites and were compared between single, double composite and 3D-print/electrospun composite (Figure 8). Single ellipsoidal 3D-printed pieces present a E′ of 3400 ± 1200 MPa, meanwhile, the single pieces with a square pore shape present a E′ of 4100 ± 2000 MPa. The coupling of two 3D-printed pieces (composite) produces a material with low E′, 1400 ± 490 MPa for an ellipsoidal composite, and 730 ± 40 MPa for square composite, when compared with single pieces. Small changes are observed with tan δ (ellipsoidal single 2.1 ± 0.1; square single 1.8 ± 0.1; ellipsoidal composite 2.2 ± 0.1; square composite 1.9 ± 0.1). Similar results in E′ have been observed in 3D-printed PLA blends with a different thickness [53]. Interestingly, the obtained E′ for 3D-printed PLA pieces, >103 MPa, are similar to values obtained by the DMA characterization of the viscoelastic behavior of human cortical bone [18]. E′ also was measured for 3D-printed/electrospun composites, and the obtained values are low in comparison with single 3D-printed pieces. However, an increase in E′ is observed in square composites containing PLA/PEG/5.0HA, when this sample is compared with composite containing PLA10 fibers. Fibers used to produce the 3D-printed/electrospun composite reinforce the mechanical properties of the composites; thus, tuning the mechanical properties of composites is done by tuning the composition of electrospun fibers.

3.4. PLA-Based Composites as Scaffolds

3.4.1. SFB Assay

The potential of the 3D-printed/electrospun composites to induce apatite formation in their surface when immersed in an acellular ionic solution and the simulated body fluid assay (SBF) were used as an in-vitro bioactivity test to study the bone-bonding ability of designed materials [54]. For the obtained composites, we studied the mechanical properties, molecular weight, and calcium derivative depositions after 30 days of immersion of the composites in SBF media. DMA was used to measure the E′ of the composites at body temperature, 37 °C, being PLA in their glassy state, and compared before (t0) and after immersion in SBF media for 30 days (t30) (Figure 9). A control sample was fabricated using two 3D-printed pieces bonded in the absence of a layer of electrospun fibers. The control samples having an ellipsoidal and square pore shape present a E′ at 37 °C of 1610 ± 315 MPa and 707 ± 37 MPa, respectively, as can be seen in the Figure 9. The E′ of 3D-printed/electrospun composites did not vary significantly as compared with control samples. In t30 samples is observed an increase in E′ compared with samples at t0, which is more pronounced in composites possessing square pores, and is less pronounced in the ellipsoidal. The increase in E′ is related to the formation of a layer of calcium derivatives on the surface of the materials [12,55].
Molecular weight of 3D-printed/electrospun composites immersed in SBF at t0 and t30 was studied by GPC, estimating the molecular weight by using narrow PMMA standards. Considering that the mass of the composite is mainly the 3D-printed structure, the results shown in Figure 10 are related to the molecular weight of the PLA used in the fabrication of 3D-printed structures. 3D-printed/electrospun composites at t0 present a Mw of 1.0–1.6 × 105 Da, with PDI ranging from 1.69 to 1.75. No significant differences in Mw are observed at t30; thus, no evidence of PLA degradation after 30 days was observed.
The deposition of calcium derivatives over the composites during SBF assay was studied by SEM-EDS (see Table S2 in Supplementary Materials). The analysis was done qualitatively in some punctual zones due to the composites here studied did not present a flat surface, required parameter for quantitative SEM-EDS analysis [56]. EDS measurements in 3D-printed/electrospun composites formulated with PLA/PEG/2.5HA and PLA/PEG/5.0HA revealed the presence of Ca and P, with ratios exceeding the expected value for HA, i.e., 5.9–8.9 vs. 2.2 (wt.% ratio), respectively. This might indicate of the formation of calcium derivatives over the surface of composites as expected from the SBF assay. The Ca exceeding the amount might be related to the presence of calcium salts used in the SBF assay.

3.4.2. 3T3 Cell Culture in the Presence of Composites

To assess the biocompatibility of the obtained PLA-based composites, we cultured the obtained 3D-printed/electrospun composites in the presence of 3T3 fibroblast cells, a broadly used in-vitro assay for biomaterials [57,58]. We selected fibroblasts to assess the in-vitro biocompatibility of the composites due to these being the most common cells found in the connective tissues of mammalians [59]. Fibroblasts are also important because they can synthesize specific macromolecules to build an extracellular matrix, thus producing the structural framework for tissues and organs [60]. The 3T3 fibroblasts used in this study were characterized by an inverted microscopy and immunocytochemistry (ICC), and the results are shown in Figure 11. Inverted microscopy images (Figure 11A) show the characteristic elongated and interconnected shape of 3T3 fibroblasts when they are forming a monolayer of cells attached to the culture plate. Hematoxylin staining (Figure 11B) allow it to mark the nuclei of 3T3 cells, showing the characteristic ellipsoidal shape of fibroblast nuclei enclosing two or more nucleolus. By using specific antibodies for fibroblast cell lineages, we identified structural proteins in the cytoskeleton, such as actin (α-SMA, Figure 11C) and vimentin (VIM, Figure 11D), which are proteins associated with the mesodermal origin of the 3T3 fibroblast [61].
An MTT assay was done to assess the viability of 3T3 fibroblasts remaining after culturing these cells in the presence of 3D-printed/electrospun composites at three different times (5, 10 and 15 days), and the results are shown in Figure 12 as percentual cell viability. The results check that the non-toxic nature of designed composites, due to cell proliferation, is observed during culturing of 3T3 cells with composites, obtaining disperse average values, and no significant differences in composites at different times of culture were observed. However, when cell viability of the 3D-printed/electrospun composites is compared with a control composite, a boost in the growth of cells cultured in the presence of ellipsoidal composites is observed, thus promoting proliferation of 3T3 cells during culturing. On the contrary, a low cell viability is observed during the culture of composites, which possesses a square pore shape.
The attachment and morphology of 3T3 fibroblast cultured in the designed 3D-printed/electrospun composites were studied by SEM. For brevity, some selected images are presented in Figure 13 in order to show that fibroblasts adhered in the 3D-printed piece and in the electrospun fibers of the composite. Although we used a commercial 3D-printer filament to print the scaffolds, in all the composites cultured with 3T3 cells we observed cells attached to the main 3D-printed structure (Figure 13A,B), showing the potential of commercial PLA to produce biocompatible materials [62]. The morphology of cells found spread over the surface of 3D-printed pieces of the composite are a blend between some apoptotic cells showing a round shape and a shrunk nucleus, besides a well-formed and interconnected network of fibroblasts linked by polarized filipodia protrusions [63,64,65]. Some cells are found in the fibrous layer of the composites after 5 days of culture (Figure 13C,D). Cells found in the ellipsoidal 3D-printed/electrospun composite prepared with a PLA10 fibrous layer (Figure 13C) are in a small zone of the fibrous layer; however, the cells found in the square composite prepared with PLA/PEG/5.0HA fibers are found to be well spread over the scanned area (Figure 13D), showing the potential of HA to induce cell attaching and spreading over the surface of the fibers.

4. Conclusions

Both electrospinning and 3D-printing technologies can be mixed to obtain composites meeting requirements for tissue engineering. By computer-assisted design it was possible to obtain scaffolds with a controlled pore shape that are easily printable in commercial 3D-printers working with PLA-based filaments and a well-known biocompatible and biodegradable polymer. The 3D-printer filament was also used to obtain the polymer used to prepare porous fibers by electrospinning, and the mechanical, morphological, and wettability properties of these fibers is improved by adding small amounts of PEG and HA as additives. A composite was obtained after mixing two layers of 3D-printed scaffolds with a central layer of PLA-based fibers. These composites showed a reduced storage modulus as compared with bare 3D-printed pieces; thus, a soft composite is obtained after blending 3D-printed pieces with electrospun fibers. The culture of these composites with 3T3 cells showed a high cell viability in those prepared with 3D-printed/electrospun composites possessing an ellipsoidal pore shape, and cells were able to attach and grow both over the surface of the 3D-printed layer and electrospun fibers. The results presented in this work shows the potential of commercial PLA 3D-printer filaments to obtain biocompatible and biomimetic composites to be used in bone tissue engineering.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13213806/s1, Figure S1: TEM of HA; Figure S2: SEM-EDS analysis of HA; Table S1: Reagents used to prepare SBF media; Table S2: Ca/P ratio analysis for samples in SBF assay obtained from SEM-EDS measurements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R.-A., V.P., G.S. and M.E.F.; methodology, P.R.-A., V.P., A.N., V.C., F.P. and M.E.F.; software, P.R.-A., V.P., G.S. and M.E.F.; validation, P.R.-A., V.P. and M.E.F.; formal analysis, P.R.-A. and M.E.F.; investigation, M.E.F.; resources, G.S., F.P., P.E., I.M.-V., J.G.L. and M.E.F.; data curation, P.R.-A. and M.E.F.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.-A. and M.E.F.; writing—review and editing, P.R.-A., V.P., A.N., V.C., F.P., P.E., G.S., J.G.L., I.M.-V. and M.E.F.; supervision, M.E.F.; project administration, M.E.F.; funding acquisition, M.E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ANID FONDECYT, grant number 11181029. Also, the authors thank the support of project Millennium Nucleus MULTIMAT, ICM-MINECON. This paper is based on a thesis submitted by Pablo Romero-Araya and Victor Pino in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor in Dental Surgery in the School of Dentistry of the Universidad Austral of Chile in October 2021.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge to Unidad de Microscopía Electrónica (UME) from Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Creación Artística, Universidad Austral de Chile, for the support brinded in sample preparation and visualization by SEM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baptista, R.; Guedes, M. Morphological and mechanical characterization of 3D printed PLA scaffolds with controlled porosity for trabecular bone tissue replacement. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 118, 111528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kokubo, T.; Takadama, H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Collins, M.N.; Ren, G.; Young, K.; Pina, S.; Reis, R.L.; Oliveira, J.M. Scaffold Fabrication Technologies and Structure/Function Properties in Bone Tissue Engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vidal, A.; Giacaman, A.; Orellana, S.S.; Jofré, S.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Oyarzún-Ampuero, F.; Concha, M. Application of Chitosan and Chondroitin Sulphate Aerogels in a Patient with Diabetes with an Open Forefoot Transmetatarsal Amputation. Wounds Compend. Clin. Res. Pract. 2020, 32, E14–E18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Villamizar, M.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Martínez, S.; Giacaman, A.; Miranda, V.; Vidal, A.; Orellana, S.L.; Concha, M.; Pavicic, F.; Lisoni, J.G.; et al. Ionic Nanocomplexes of Hyaluronic Acid and Polyarginine to Form Solid Materials: A Green Methodology to Obtain Sponges with Biomedical Potential. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rajab, T.K.; O’Malley, T.J.; Tchantchaleishvili, V. Decellularized scaffolds for tissue engineering: Current status and future perspective. Artif. Organs 2020, 44, 1031–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sengupta, P.; Prasad, B.L.V. Surface Modification of Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 2018, 4, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miculescu, F.; Luță, C.; Constantinescu, A.E.; Maidaniuc, A.; Mocanu, A.-C.; Miculescu, M.; Voicu Ștefan, I.; Ciocan, L.T. Considerations and Influencing Parameters in EDS Microanalysis of Biogenic Hydroxyapatite. J. Funct. Biomater. 2020, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szcześ, A.; Holysz, L.; Chibowski, E. Synthesis of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Szcześ, A.; Yan, Y.; Chibowski, E.; Hołysz, L.; Banach, M. Properties of natural and synthetic hydroxyapatite and their surface free energy determined by the thin-layer wicking method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 434, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, H.-W.; Lee, H.-H.; Knowles, J.C. Electrospinning biomedical nanocomposite fibers of hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic acid) for bone regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2006, 79, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ni, J.; Wang, M. In vitro evaluation of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyhydroxybutyrate composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2002, 20, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rijal, N.P.; Narmoneva, D.A. Chapter 14—Biomaterials for Diabetic Wound-Healing Therapies. In Tissue Repair, and Regeneration in Diabetes; Bagchi, D., Das, A., Roy, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambrigdge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 273–304. ISBN 978-0-12-816413-6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mulinti, P.; Brooks, J.E.; Lervick, B.; Pullan, J.E.; Brooks, A.E. 10—Strategies to improve the hemocompatibility of biodegradable biomaterials. In Hemocompatibility of Biomaterials for Clinical Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 253–278. ISBN 978-0-08-100497-5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hale, M.B.; Romero-Araya, P.; Herrera, M.C.; Espinoza, D.; Castro, N.; Castro, J.; Serandour, G. Computer-assisted planning with 3D printing for mandibular reconstruction caused by a mandibular fracture with secondary osteomyelitis: A Case Report. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e04410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, R.; McCarthy, A.; Zhang, Y.S.; Xie, J. Decorating 3D Printed Scaffolds with Electrospun Nanofiber Segments for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Biosyst. 2019, 3, e1900137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mountcastle, S.E.; Allen, P.; Mellors, B.; Lawless, B.M.; Cooke, M.E.; Lavecchia, C.E.; Fell, N.L.A.; Espino, D.M.; Jones, S.W.; Cox, S.C. Dynamic viscoelastic characterisation of human osteochondral tissue: Understanding the effect of the cartilage-bone interface. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2019, 20, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yamashita, J.; Furman, B.R.; Rawls, H.R.; Wang, X.; Agrawal, C.M. The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001, 58, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roshandel, M.; Dorkoosh, F. Cardiac tissue engineering, biomaterial scaffolds, and their fabrication techniques. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 2290–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ngo, T.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K.T.; Hui, D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teodori, L.; Costa, A.; Marzio, R.; Perniconi, B.; Coletti, D.; Adamo, S.; Gupta, B.; Tárnok, A. Native extracellular matrix: A new scaffolding platform for repair of damaged muscle. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Frenot, A.; Chronakis, I.S. Polymer nanofibers assembled by electrospinning. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 8, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Casasola, R.; Thomas, N.; Trybala, A.; Georgiadou, S. Electrospun poly lactic acid (PLA) fibres: Effect of different solvent systems on fibre morphology and diameter. Polymer 2014, 55, 4728–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fernández, D.; Guerra, M.; Lisoni, J.G.; Hoffmann, T.; Araya-Hermosilla, R.; Shibue, T.; Nishide, H.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Flores, M.E. Fibrous Materials Made of Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Poly(ethylene oxide)-b-Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blends Support Neural Stem Cells Differentiation. Polymers 2019, 11, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kim, D.; Kim, S.-M.; Lee, S.; Yoon, M.-H. Investigation of neuronal pathfinding and construction of artificial neuronal networks on 3D-arranged porous fibrillar scaffolds with controlled geometry. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Mori, A.; Fernández, M.P.; Blunn, G.; Tozzi, G.; Roldo, M. 3D Printing and Electrospinning of Composite Hydrogels for Cartilage and Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2018, 10, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kozior, T.; Mamun, A.; Trabelsi, M.; Wortmann, M.; Lilia, S.; Ehrmann, A. Electrospinning on 3D Printed Polymers for Mechanically Stabilized Filter Composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Molde, J.; Steele, J.A.M.; Pastino, A.K.; Mahat, A.; Murthy, N.S.; Kohn, J. A step toward engineering thick tissues: Distributing microfibers within 3D printed frames. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2020, 108, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. He, H.; Molnár, K. Fabrication of 3D printed nanocomposites with electrospun nanofiber interleaves. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 46, 102030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pensa, N.W.; Curry, A.S.; Bonvallet, P.P.; Bellis, N.F.; Rettig, K.M.; Reddy, M.S.; Eberhardt, A.W.; Bellis, S.L. 3D printed mesh reinforcements enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun scaffolds. Biomater. Res. 2019, 23, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sanosh, K.; Chu, M.-C.; Balakrishnan, A.; Lee, Y.-J.; Kim, T.; Cho, S.-J. Synthesis of nano hydroxyapatite powder that simulate teeth particle morphology and composition. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 1459–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Covarrubias, C.; Arroyo, F.; Balanda, C.; Neira, M.; Von Marttens, A.; Caviedes, P.; Rodríguez, J.P.; Urra, C. The Effect of the Nanoscale Structure of Nanobioceramics on Their In Vitro Bioactivity and Cell Differentiation Properties. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 526230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wallin, R.F.; Arscott, E.F. A practical guide to ISO 10993-5: Cytotoxicity. Med. Device Diagn. Ind. 1998, 20, 96–98. [Google Scholar]
  34. Diez-Escudero, A.; Andersson, B.; Persson, C.; Hailer, N.P. Hexagonal pore geometry and the presence of hydroxyapatite enhance deposition of mineralized bone matrix on additively manufactured polylactic acid scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 125, 112091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lewis, P.L.; Green, R.M.; Shah, R.N. 3D-printed gelatin scaffolds of differing pore geometry modulate hepatocyte function and gene expression. Acta Biomater. 2018, 69, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rumpler, M.; Woesz, A.; Dunlop, J.W.; van Dongen, J.T.; Fratzl, P. The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. J. R. Soc. Interface 2008, 5, 1173–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Knychala, J.; Bouropoulos, N.; Catt, C.J.; Katsamenis, O.; Please, C.; Sengers, B. Pore Geometry Regulates Early Stage Human Bone Marrow Cell Tissue Formation and Organisation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 41, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schlummer, M. Chapter 25—Recycling of Postindustrial and Postconsumer Plastics Containing Flame Retardants. In Polymer Green Flame Retardants; Papaspyrides, C.D., Kiliaris, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 869–889. ISBN 978-0-444-53808-6. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vollmer, I.; Jenks, M.J.F.; Roelands, M.C.P.; White, R.J.; Van Harmelen, T.; De Wild, P.; Van Der Laan, G.P.; Meirer, F.; Keurentjes, J.T.F.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Beyond Mechanical Recycling: Giving New Life to Plastic Waste. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15402–15423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Bognitzki, M.; Czado, W.; Frese, T.; Schaper, A.; Hellwig, M.; Steinhart, M.; Greiner, A.; Wendorff, J.H. Nanostructured Fibers via Electrospinning. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bognitzki, M.; Frese, T.; Steinhart, M.; Greiner, A.; Wendorff, J.H.; Schaper, A.; Hellwig, M. Preparation of fibers with nanoscaled morphologies: Electrospinning of polymer blends. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Natarajan, L.; New, J.; Dasari, A.; Yu, S.; Manan, M.A. Surface morphology of electrospun PLA fibers: Mechanisms of pore formation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 44082–44088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tanaka, K.; Shiga, T.; Katayama, T. Fabrication of hydroxyapatite/PLA composite nanofiber by electrospinning. In High Performance and Optimum Design of Structures and Materials II; WIT Press: Southampton, UK, 2016; Volume 166, pp. 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kotrotsos, A.; Yiallouros, P.; Kostopoulos, V. Fabrication and Characterization of Polylactic Acid Electrospun Scaffolds Modified with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles. Biomimetics 2020, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stastna, E.; Castkova, K.; Rahel, J. Influence of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles and Surface Plasma Treatment on Bioactivity of Polycaprolactone Nanofibers. Polymers 2020, 12, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Priya, M.S.; Naresh, K.; Jayaganthan, R.; Velmurugan, R. A comparative study between in-house 3D printed and injection molded ABS and PLA polymers for low-frequency applications. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 085345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, R. Time-temperature superposition method for glass transition temperature of plastic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2000, 278, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bashir, M. Use of Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) for Characterizing Interfacial Interactions in Filled Polymers. Solids 2021, 2, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ali, F.; Chang, Y.-W.; Kang, S.C.; Yoon, J.Y. Thermal, mechanical and rheological properties of poly (lactic acid)/epoxidized soybean oil blends. Polym. Bull. 2008, 62, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Courgneau, C.; Domenek, S.; Guinault, A.; Avérous, L.; Ducruet, V. Analysis of the Structure-Properties Relationships of Different Multiphase Systems Based on Plasticized Poly(Lactic Acid). J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Badia, J.; Strömberg, E.; Karlsson, S.; Ribes-Greus, A. Material valorisation of amorphous polylactide. Influence of thermo-mechanical degradation on the morphology, segmental dynamics, thermal and mechanical performance. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cristea, M.; Ionita, D.; Iftime, M.M. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis Investigations of PLA-Based Renewable Materials: How Are They Useful? Materials 2020, 13, 5320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fuentes, M.A.V.; Thakur, S.; Wu, F.; Misra, M.; Gregori, S.; Mohanty, A.K. Study on the 3D printability of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly(lactic acid) blends with chain extender using fused filament fabrication. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Baino, F.; Yamaguchi, S. The Use of Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) for Assessing Materials Bioactivity in the Context of Tissue Engineering: Review and Challenges. Biomimetics 2020, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Caridade, S.G.; Merino, E.G.; Alves, N.M.; Bermudez, V.D.Z.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Mano, J.F. Chitosan membranes containing micro or nano-size bioactive glass particles: Evolution of biomineralization followed by in situ dynamic mechanical analysis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 20, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Newbury, D.; Ritchie, N. Quantitative SEM/EDS, Step 1: What Constitutes a Sufficiently Flat Specimen? Microsc. Microanal. 2013, 19, 1244–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hannan, R.T.; Peirce, S.; Barker, T.H. Fibroblasts: Diverse Cells Critical to Biomaterials Integration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Idrees, A.; Chiono, V.; Ciardelli, G.; Shah, S.; Viebahn, R.; Zhang, X.; Salber, J. Validation of in vitro assays in three-dimensional human dermal constructs. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2018, 41, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wlaschek, M.; Maity, P.; Makrantonaki, E.; Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. Connective Tissue and Fibroblast Senescence in Skin Aging. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 141, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tracy, L.E.; Minasian, R.A.; Caterson, E. Extracellular Matrix and Dermal Fibroblast Function in the Healing Wound. Adv. Wound Care 2016, 5, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dave, J.M.; Bayless, K.J. Vimentin as an Integral Regulator of Cell Adhesion and Endothelial Sprouting. Microcirculation 2014, 21, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Alam, F.; Verma, P.; Mohammad, W.; Teo, J.; Varadarajan, K.M.; Kumar, S. Architected poly(lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone)/halloysite nanotube composite scaffolds enabled by 3D printing for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 14070–14083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Palamà, I.E.; D’Amone, S.; Arcadio, V.; Biasiucci, M.; Mezzi, A.; Cortese, B. Cell mechanotactic and cytotoxic response to zinc oxide nanorods depends on substrate stiffness. Toxicol. Res. 2016, 5, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Orellana, S.L.; Giacaman, A.; Pavicic, F.; Vidal, A.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Concha, M. Relevance of charge balance and hyaluronic acid on alginate-chitosan sponge microstructure and its influence on fibroblast growth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2016, 104, 2537–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Manaspon, C.; Jongwannasiri, C.; Chumprasert, S.; Sa-Ard-Iam, N.; Mahanonda, R.; Pavasant, P.; Porntaveetus, T.; Osathanon, T. Human dental pulp stem cell responses to different dental pulp capping materials. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 13 03806 g001 550
Figure 1. Scaffolds obtained by CAD. Values related with scaffold dimensions are listed in Table 1.
Figure 1. Scaffolds obtained by CAD. Values related with scaffold dimensions are listed in Table 1.
Polymers 13 03806 g001
Polymers 13 03806 g002 550
Figure 2. Macrostructure of ellipsoidal and square pore shape PLA pieces obtained through 3D-printing.
Figure 2. Macrostructure of ellipsoidal and square pore shape PLA pieces obtained through 3D-printing.
Polymers 13 03806 g002
Polymers 13 03806 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images (I) and size distribution of fiber diameter (II) of PLA-based electrospun fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA. Scale bar is 5 µm.
Figure 3. SEM images (I) and size distribution of fiber diameter (II) of PLA-based electrospun fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA. Scale bar is 5 µm.
Polymers 13 03806 g003
Polymers 13 03806 g004 550
Figure 4. Tensile stress–strain plot (I), and Young modulus for PLA-based fibers (II): (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Figure 4. Tensile stress–strain plot (I), and Young modulus for PLA-based fibers (II): (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Polymers 13 03806 g004
Polymers 13 03806 g005 550
Figure 5. Wettability of electrospun fibers. (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Figure 5. Wettability of electrospun fibers. (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Polymers 13 03806 g005
Polymers 13 03806 g006 550
Figure 6. (I) Images of 3D-printed/electrospun composites obtained after combining 3D-printed PLA pieces with ellipsoidal and square pores with PLA-based fibers. (II) SEM images of the fibrous layer of PLA-based electrospun composites deposited over the surface of 3D-printed pieces.
Figure 6. (I) Images of 3D-printed/electrospun composites obtained after combining 3D-printed PLA pieces with ellipsoidal and square pores with PLA-based fibers. (II) SEM images of the fibrous layer of PLA-based electrospun composites deposited over the surface of 3D-printed pieces.
Polymers 13 03806 g006
Polymers 13 03806 g007 550
Figure 7. Storage modulus (E′) (I) and tan δ (II) measured in DMA from a temperature scan for single square (a), and single ellipsoidal (b) 3D-printed pieces. The E′ and tan δ of two 3D-printed pieces with ellipsoidal (c) and square (d) pores bonded forming a double composite are also shown.
Figure 7. Storage modulus (E′) (I) and tan δ (II) measured in DMA from a temperature scan for single square (a), and single ellipsoidal (b) 3D-printed pieces. The E′ and tan δ of two 3D-printed pieces with ellipsoidal (c) and square (d) pores bonded forming a double composite are also shown.
Polymers 13 03806 g007
Polymers 13 03806 g008 550
Figure 8. Comparison of E′ for ellipsoidal (I) and square (II) pore shape 3D-printed materials at 25 °C for single 3D-printed pieces (single 3D), two 3D-printed pieces bonded (composite), and 3D-printed/electrospun composites (PLA10, PLA/PEG/, PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and PLA/PEG/5.0HA).
Figure 8. Comparison of E′ for ellipsoidal (I) and square (II) pore shape 3D-printed materials at 25 °C for single 3D-printed pieces (single 3D), two 3D-printed pieces bonded (composite), and 3D-printed/electrospun composites (PLA10, PLA/PEG/, PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and PLA/PEG/5.0HA).
Polymers 13 03806 g008
Polymers 13 03806 g009 550
Figure 9. E′ at 37 °C of ellipsoidal (I) and square (II) 3D-printed/electrospun composites immersed in SBF media for 30 days. A control sample is a composite prepared without covering the surface of 3D-printed pieces with fibers, and A-D are those composites prepared with a layer of PLA-based fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Figure 9. E′ at 37 °C of ellipsoidal (I) and square (II) 3D-printed/electrospun composites immersed in SBF media for 30 days. A control sample is a composite prepared without covering the surface of 3D-printed pieces with fibers, and A-D are those composites prepared with a layer of PLA-based fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Polymers 13 03806 g009
Polymers 13 03806 g010 550
Figure 10. Molecular weight estimated by GPC for of 3D-printed/electrospun ellipsoidal (I) and (II) square composites immersed in SBF media for 30 days A control sample is a composite prepared without cover the surface of 3D-printed pieces with fibers, and A-D are those prepared with PLA based fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Figure 10. Molecular weight estimated by GPC for of 3D-printed/electrospun ellipsoidal (I) and (II) square composites immersed in SBF media for 30 days A control sample is a composite prepared without cover the surface of 3D-printed pieces with fibers, and A-D are those prepared with PLA based fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Polymers 13 03806 g010
Polymers 13 03806 g011 550
Figure 11. Morphological characterization of 3T3 fibroblasts by inverted microscopy (A) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) (B–D). (A) Cells observed by inverted microscopy; (B) negative ICC control (omission of antibody); (C) visualization of alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, Dako, dilution 1:250), used to mark the cytoskeleton of 3T3 fibroblast; (D) visualization of vimentin (VIM, Cell signaling, dilution 1:250), used to mark the cytoskeleton of 3T3 fibroblast. Cells were counterstained with hematoxylin. Images were captured at 40× magnification.
Figure 11. Morphological characterization of 3T3 fibroblasts by inverted microscopy (A) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) (B–D). (A) Cells observed by inverted microscopy; (B) negative ICC control (omission of antibody); (C) visualization of alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, Dako, dilution 1:250), used to mark the cytoskeleton of 3T3 fibroblast; (D) visualization of vimentin (VIM, Cell signaling, dilution 1:250), used to mark the cytoskeleton of 3T3 fibroblast. Cells were counterstained with hematoxylin. Images were captured at 40× magnification.
Polymers 13 03806 g011
Polymers 13 03806 g012 550
Figure 12. MTT assay for cells after contact with 3D-printed/electrospun ellipsoidal (I) and square (II) composites. A control sample is a composite prepared without cover over the surface of 3D-printed pieces with fibers; and A-D are those prepared with PLA-based fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Figure 12. MTT assay for cells after contact with 3D-printed/electrospun ellipsoidal (I) and square (II) composites. A control sample is a composite prepared without cover over the surface of 3D-printed pieces with fibers; and A-D are those prepared with PLA-based fibers: (A) PLA10, (B) PLA/PEG, (C) PLA/PEG/2.5HA, and (D) PLA/PEG/5.0HA.
Polymers 13 03806 g012
Polymers 13 03806 g013 550
Figure 13. Selected SEM images of 3D-printed/electrospun composites cultured for 5 days with 3T3 cells. Fibroblast adhered to the 3D-printed piece are showed in (A,B). ((A) is a square 3D-printed/electrospun composite with PLA10 fibers, and (B) is the ellipsoidal composite with PLA/PEG/5.0HA fibers). The fibroblasts which adhered to the fibrous layer of the composite are showed in (C,D). ((C) is an ellipsoidal composite with PLA10 fibers, and (D) is a square composite with PLA/PEG/5.0HA fibers).
Figure 13. Selected SEM images of 3D-printed/electrospun composites cultured for 5 days with 3T3 cells. Fibroblast adhered to the 3D-printed piece are showed in (A,B). ((A) is a square 3D-printed/electrospun composite with PLA10 fibers, and (B) is the ellipsoidal composite with PLA/PEG/5.0HA fibers). The fibroblasts which adhered to the fibrous layer of the composite are showed in (C,D). ((C) is an ellipsoidal composite with PLA10 fibers, and (D) is a square composite with PLA/PEG/5.0HA fibers).
Polymers 13 03806 g013
Table
Table 1. CAD scaffolds dimensions.
Table 1. CAD scaffolds dimensions.
Dimensions1Ellipsoidal
(mm)		Square
(mm)
Length (l)40 mm40 mm
Pore size (p)p1: 1.5 mmp1: 1.5 mm
p2: 1.3 mmp2: 1.5 mm
Height (h)1.5 mm1.5 mm
Filament thickness (e)1.0 mm1.0 mm
Table
Table 2. 3D-printer parameters used to print.
Table 2. 3D-printer parameters used to print.
ParametersValue
Nozzle diameter0.4 mm
Layer height0.1 mm
Initial layer height0.1 mm
Line width0.1 mm
Print speed100 mm/s
Printing temperature200 °C
Print plate temperature60 °C
Infill patternLines/Concentric
Type of adhesion of the printing plateRaft
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romero-Araya, P.; Pino, V.; Nenen, A.; Cárdenas, V.; Pavicic, F.; Ehrenfeld, P.; Serandour, G.; Lisoni, J.G.; Moreno-Villoslada, I.; Flores, M.E. Combining Materials Obtained by 3D-Printing and Electrospinning from Commercial Polylactide Filament to Produce Biocompatible Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 3806. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213806

AMA Style

Romero-Araya P, Pino V, Nenen A, Cárdenas V, Pavicic F, Ehrenfeld P, Serandour G, Lisoni JG, Moreno-Villoslada I, Flores ME. Combining Materials Obtained by 3D-Printing and Electrospinning from Commercial Polylactide Filament to Produce Biocompatible Composites. Polymers. 2021; 13(21):3806. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romero-Araya, Pablo, Victor Pino, Ariel Nenen, Verena Cárdenas, Francisca Pavicic, Pamela Ehrenfeld, Guillaume Serandour, Judit G. Lisoni, Ignacio Moreno-Villoslada, and Mario E. Flores. 2021. "Combining Materials Obtained by 3D-Printing and Electrospinning from Commercial Polylactide Filament to Produce Biocompatible Composites" Polymers 13, no. 21: 3806. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213806

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop