Next Article in Journal
Articular and Artificial Cartilage, Characteristics, Properties and Testing Approaches—A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Analysis of the Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Diorite-Reinforced Epoxy Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Research and Development of Face Masks and Respirators Pre and Post the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermo-Mechanical and Delamination Properties in Drilling GFRP Composites by Various Drill Angles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bacterial Cellulose-Based Nanocomposites Containing Ceria and Their Use in the Process of Stem Cell Proliferation

by
Iosif V. Gofman
1,*,
Alexandra L. Nikolaeva
1,
Albert K. Khripunov
1,
Elena M. Ivan’kova
1,
Anton S. Shabunin
2,
Alexander V. Yakimansky
1,3,
Dmitriy P. Romanov
4,
Anton L. Popov
5,6,
Artem M. Ermakov
5,
Sergey O. Solomevich
7,
Pavel M. Bychkovsky
7,
Alexander E. Baranchikov
6 and
Vladimir K. Ivanov
6
1
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199004 Saint Petersburg, Russia
2
H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Children’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Pushkin, 196603 Saint Petersburg, Russia
3
Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 198504 Saint Petersburg, Russia
4
Institute of Silicate Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
5
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
6
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
7
Research Institute for Physical and Chemical Problems, Belarusian State University, 220030 Minsk, Belarus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(12), 1999; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121999
Submission received: 20 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 18 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Polymer Composites)

Abstract

:
A technique for the fabrication of bacterial cellulose-based films with CeO2 nanofiller has been developed. The structural and morphological characteristics of the materials have been studied, their thermal and mechanical properties in dry and swollen states having been determined. The preparation methodology makes it possible to obtain composites with a uniform distribution of nanoparticles. The catalytic effect of ceria, regarding the thermal oxidative destruction of cellulose, has been confirmed by TGA and DTA methods. An increase in CeO2 content led to an increase in the elastic modulus (a 1.27-fold increase caused by the introduction of 5 wt.% of the nanofiller into the polymer) and strength of the films. This effect is explained by the formation of additional links between polymer macro-chains via the nanoparticles’ surface. The materials fabricated were characterized by a limited ability to swell in water. Swelling caused a 20- to 30-fold reduction in the stiffness of the material, the mechanical properties of the films in a swollen state remaining germane to their practical use. The application of the composite films in cell engineering as substrates for the stem cells’ proliferation has been studied. The increase in CeO2 content in the films enhanced the proliferative activity of embryonic mouse stem cells. The cells cultured on the scaffold containing 5 wt.% of ceria demonstrated increased cell survival and migration activity. An analysis of gene expression confirmed improved cultivation conditions on CeO2-containing scaffolds.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the 21st century, there has been growing attention among researchers and chemical engineers in the field of novel polymer materials in so-called natural or “green” polymers, including cellulose and its derivatives [1]. Of particular interest are materials based on bacterial cellulose (BC) [2], which is a product of the vital activity of Acetobacteraceae bacteria (Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria) in carbon-containing nutrient media. Typically, the media are aqueous solutions of carbohydrates [2], mainly glucose, less commonly saccharose, fructose, maltose, xylose, and polyatomic alcohols, etc.
BC is a hydrophilic material with a high degree of structural ordering of macromolecules (the degree of crystallinity is as high as 90–95%). It possesses a complex hierarchical supramolecular structure which consists of ribbon-like fibrils up to 100 nm wide. The fibrils are formed of small nanofibrillar elements with a characteristic size of 7–10 nm assembled in bundles and tows [1,2].
BC does not contain any contaminants such as lignin, pectins, or hemicellulose, which are present in plant analogues of BC even after purification [2]. BC is characterized by high mechanical strength and stiffness, and the capability of retaining large amounts of water when swelling (up to 98–99% of the total mass of the material, depending on preparation technique). Moreover, it is biodegradable and has excellent biocompatibility, including with human tissues. BC has the merit of being a non-cytotoxic, non-genotoxic material, causing no allergic reactions from a human organism. For these reasons BC seems to be an extremely promising material for biomedical applications [3,4,5,6].
The great scope for the development and further modification of “green” materials in order to improve their characteristics is associated with the preparation of composites based on BC with either inorganic or organic components [7,8,9,10], particularly with nanoparticles. Such an approach is widely used in the fabrication of novel polymer-based materials. Oxide nanoparticles are among the most commonly employed active nanofillers used for the enhancement of polymer properties. Nanoparticles have been proven to substantially alter various properties of materials, such as their mechanical, thermal, electrical, and transport properties [11,12,13,14]. Therefore, metal oxide nanoparticles are likely to have a profound effect on a number of cellulose functional properties.
Cerium oxide (ceria) nanoparticles are promising for use as an active nanofiller in polymer composites [15]. They have been shown to solve the following problems in polymer science: the screening of electromagnetic irradiation, fabrication of catalysts, modification of the acoustic properties of a polymer matrix, etc. [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Last but not least, the possibility of using nanosized CeO2 in biomedical nanocomposite materials seems quite promising, taking into account a great deal of information on the salient biological activity of ceria. The latter has been reported as an antibacterial [22], antioxidant [23,24], and antitumour [25,26] agent. Ceria has been demonstrated to prevent sepsis [27]. The positive effect of nanosized cerium dioxide on the intensity of proliferation of stem cells on CeO2-containing scaffolds has been observed in a number of works [28,29]. The most recent advances in properties and applications of nanoceria are summarized elsewhere [30]. Thus, ceria-containing polymer nanocomposites are anticipated to combine the advantageous properties exhibited by both the matrix and the filler and to reduce their intrinsic drawbacks.
This paper reports on what was intended to be a thorough investigation of the effect of ceria as an active nanofiller on the characteristics of BC-based nanocomposite materials. Their biological activity has been tested, with a focus on their use in bioengineering, specifically as scaffolds for stem cell proliferation. It has already been shown that bare BC can be used as a substrate facilitating tissue regeneration and possessing cell affinity [31,32,33]. Therefore, it is reasonable to assess the effect of CeO2 nanoparticles on cell proliferation on BC-based scaffolds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Glucose (≥99.5%, #G7021), ethanol (96.0–97.2%, #24105), citric acid (≥99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, #251275), and cerium (III) nitrate (99%, #238538) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Chemically pure yeast extract was provided by “best Group” (Moscow, Russia). Isopropanol (≥99.8%, puriss p.a.) was purchased from Khimmed (Moscow, Russia).

2.2. Bacterial Cellulose

BC was produced by Kommagateibacter xylinus (acetic acid bacteria, a VKM-880 strain) in aqueous solutions containing 2 wt.% of glucose, 0.3 wt.% of yeast extract, and 2 wt.% of ethanol at 30 °C for 14–21 days [34]. The as-prepared BC samples were gel-like pellicles up to 25 mm thick. The pellicles were partially dehydrated using a hand press to fabricate BC films, the BC concentration in the films being about 14 wt.%.

2.3. CeO2 Nanoparticles

The cerium dioxide nanoparticles, with sizes ~3.5–5 nm, used in the experiments were synthesized using a modified protocol, reported elsewhere [35]. Briefly, to a water-isopropanol (1:19 vol.) 0.1 M solution of cerium(III) nitrate, a water-isopropanol (1:5 vol.) solution of citric acid (cerium to citrate ratio 1:1) was added to form a white sediment. The resulting powder was thoroughly washed, dried, and then dispersed in distilled water. Concentrated ammonia solution was added to a suspension and the mixture was refluxed in air at pH 9–10 for 12 h. The resulting ceria sol was boiled for 1 h to remove any excess of ammonia, to pH 8.

2.4. Thin Film Fabrication

Pressed BC was fragmented in a high-speed blender (15,000 rpm, 15 min) in an aqueous medium (300 mL of water per 1 g of dry BC). The suspension prepared was cast onto a glass support and dried at 160 °C to a constant weight. In order to prepare the nanocomposites, certain amounts of ceria aqueous dispersions (with CeO2 concentration of 1.5%) were poured into the BC aqueous suspension. The films were fabricated using the aforementioned technique. All the films prepared were dense, homogeneous and ~40 μm thick. The nominal concentrations of CeO2 nanoparticles in the samples were 0 wt.% (bare BC film), 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 5 wt.%.

2.5. Film Characterisation Techniques

XRD Analysis

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the films was performed on a DRON-3M X-ray diffractometer (CuKα-irradiation). The registration of X-ray beam diffraction was carried out according to the Bragg–Brentano scheme [36].

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The surface of the films was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM images were obtained with a scanning electron microscope SUPRA-55VP (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), using a secondary electron detector, as well as a detector of back-scattered electrons. The samples were fixed with special glue on the microscope holders and sputtered by thin layer of platinum. Element maps were collected with an EDX-max 80 mm2 detector (Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK).

2.7. Thermal Analysis

Thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential thermal (DTA) analyses were performed to determine the concentration of remaining water in the films and the exact contents of ceria in the nanocomposite materials. The effect of CeO2 on the kinetics of thermal decomposition of the samples was assessed. A DTG-60 thermal analyser (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used, the samples (~5 mg) being heated in air up to 600 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min.

2.8. Swelling Properties

To determine equilibrium water absorption, the samples, having first been dried at 150 °C, were weighed and then immersed in the distilled water. The swollen samples were periodically removed from the water, wiped with a tissue, and weighed. The experiment continued until a constant weight had been attained.
Water absorption Wm was calculated using the following equation:
W m = m s m d m d   ×   100 ,
where ms and md are the weights of the swollen and dry samples, respectively.

2.9. Mechanical Properties

An AG-100kNX Plus setup (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) operating in a uniaxial extension mode was used to study the mechanical characteristics of the films. Strip-like samples (2 × 30 mm2) were stretched at room temperature at a rate of 10 mm/min, according to ASTM D638 requirements. The Young’s modulus E, the break stress σb, and the ultimate deformation εb were determined.

2.10. Cell Proliferation Control Techniques

Cell Culture

The experiments were conducted using mouse mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) at the 3rd passage, harvested from the embryonic skeleton of 13 day-old embryos of B10GFP/Balb/c hybrid mice carrying a green fluorescent protein (GFP). The cells were received from the vivarium of ICB RAS (Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of EU directive 2010/63 of European Parliament and council of Europe Union 22 September 2010 for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and approved by the Institutional Ethics and biosafety committee of Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics Russian Academy of Sciences. The animals were fed twice a day. Animal maintenance was in accordance with the rules of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and the Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 199n “Rules of Good Laboratory Practice”.
Using this type of cell was regarded as being expedient due to the need to avoid applying fluorescent dyes in order to prevent the coloration of the samples under study. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation on the 13th day of gestation. Their uteri with embryos were isolated. After tissue dissociation in 0.25% trypsin-0.02% EDTA solution (NPO “PanEco”, Moscow, Russia) for 30 min at 37 °C, the cells were collected by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 2 min. Then, the cells were re-suspended to obtain a single-cell state in a DMEM/F12 medium (NPO “PanEco”, Russia) supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) (in 1:1 ratio). The resulting suspensions were transferred into vials and cultivated in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C in DMEM containing 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, MI, USA) and 100 units/mL of penicillin/streptomycin, with the addition of 2 mM L-glutamine. When a subconfluent state was reached, the cells were treated with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution and seeded into vials in a 1:3 ratio. The cultivation was carried out in a DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, MI, USA) and 100 units/mL of penicillin/streptomycin, with the addition of 2 mM L-glutamine. Cultures of 2–5 passages were used in the research. The analysis of the viability of cell cultures was carried out using the resazurin assay. After 24–96 h of cultivation, the cell culture medium was replaced with one containing 0.02% solution resazurin and the MSC were further cultured.

2.11. Fluorescent Microscopy

The films were cut into 0.8 × 0.8 cm2 fragments and placed in the wells of a 24-well plate, under sterile conditions. One sample was assigned to each test point. A sterile cover glass was used as a reference sample. Cells were seeded on the substrates’ surface. The initial cell seeding density was 30 × 104 cells/cm2. The morphological assessment of the cells cultivated on the surface of the test materials was implemented on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day of cultivation in fluorescent light, using an inverted microscope Zeiss Axiovert 200 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.12. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The cells were plated on the substrates and cultivated for 24 to 96 h. The samples were then washed twice for 30 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4 and dehydrated by being passed through alcohol solution of increasing concentration: 30%, 50%, 70%, and 80% for 30 min, and 90% and 100% for 30 min (twice). At the final stage, the samples were placed in a hexamethyldisilazane solution for 24 h. In order to avoid charge accumulation during scanning, the samples were coated with a 2 nm gold layer by ion sputtering in an argon atmosphere (0.1 mm Hg). A SUPRA-55VP (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) microscope was used in the experiments.

2.13. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR-RT)

Reverse transcription was performed with a Sileks kit (Sileks, Moscow, Russia), using an oligo(dT) primer, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNAs produced served as a real-time PCR matrix. For PCR reaction, a mixture was used with SYBR Green dye (Syntol, Moscow, Russia). To analyze the expression activity of 93 key genes under cell cultivation on the CeO2-containing scaffolds, a CFX-96 amplifier ((BioRad, Irvin, CA, USA) or an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used. The expression of 96 genes responsible for key cell processes (Supplementary Table S1) was thus determined. The genes that were analyzed were selected from the database https://dataanalysis2.qiagen.com/pcr (accessed on 16 June 2021) for PCR profiling of different biological processes. The level of gene transcription was normalized according to the levels of expression of housekeeping genes β-actin, rplp0 (ribosomal protein, large, P0), and gapdh (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). Gene-specific primers were selected using the Primer Express program (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Each measurement was made twice (internal repetition) and averaged for two independent samples. A sample without a reverse transcription stage was used as the control. The expression data obtained were analyzed using online services https://dataanalysis2.qiagen.com/pcr, mayday-2.14 software (Center for Bioinformatics, Tübingen, Germany) and Genesis software.

3. Results

3.1. SEM

SEM images of the films fabricated (Figure 1) show clearly the structural elements of the films, namely tightly-packed fibrils. Comparing the morphologies of the composite and pristine BC films, there is no noticeable effect of CeO2 nanoparticles on the packing type, except that the BC fibrils in the composite films seem to be aggregated more closely. No evident aggregates of CeO2 nanoparticles are seen on the composite films’ surfaces.

3.2. XRD Analysis

Obviously, the SEM technique does not enable individual filler nanoparticles to be distinguished. Their presence in the films is only evident from the comparative analysis of the XRD patterns of the films and pristine CeO2 powder (Figure 2). Well-resolved reflections at 2θ near 14.4°, 16.7°, and 22.4° are revealed in all XRD patterns of BC-based films. According to the data of X-ray scattering, the structure of these specimens is attributed to highly crystalline cellulose I, most probably Iα allomorph [37].
The XRD pattern for CeO2 powder shows sharp reflections at 2θ = 28.7, 32.97, and 47.5 deg. attributed to (111), (200), and (220) planes, respectively, corresponding to the cubic fluorite crystal structure (ICDD PDF card #34-394, data from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Boulder, CO, USA)). The full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the (111) peak was used in the calculation of the apparent transverse D111 sizes of CeO2 crystals, using Scherrer’s equation [38]. The D111 size was found to be ~5.4 nm. The same reflections, along with those of the BC, can be seen in the patterns of the nanocomposite films (Figure 2b–d). Their intensities increased linearly with the concentration of ceria nanoparticles in the BC matrix.

3.3. EDX Analysis

Figure 3 shows the results of energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). This method enables the distribution of elements on the surface of a sample to be mapped. The results confirm the presence and increasing concentration of cerium (the areas appearing as speckled yellow in Figure 3c,e) in the samples, images of the latter being shown in Figure 3b,d. The information on the total percentage of Ce can also be obtained by EDX analysis. It was derived that the weight amounts of Ce are the following: 0.81 wt.% for the composite film containing 1% CeO2, and 4.02 wt.% for the 5% CeO2 film.

3.4. Thermal Analysis

TGA was used to precisely determine the nanofiller concentration in the nanocomposite films prepared (Figure 4). The shape of the BC weight loss curve in air (Figure 4a) is attributable to the complete decomposition of the polymer upon heating to 500 °C, accompanied by the removal of the gaseous products. A different outcome is observed from the TGA of the composite films (Figure 4a), viz., after total volatilization of the organic part of the material, stable inorganic residues were obtained, whose concentrations in the films (1.0 wt.%, 3.05 wt.%, and 4.90 wt.%) corresponded to those used in the fabrication of the composite samples.
The TGA curves also enable an evaluation of the weight of water remaining in the as-prepared films. The curves show an initial weight loss step below 120 °C, followed by a plateau at higher temperatures, where the weight did not change until the start of thermal decomposition. The weight loss in all of the samples in this low-temperature region was ~2.0–2.5%. The TGA curves corroborate the literature data [18,39] on the catalytic activity of ceria in decomposition reactions of a number of organic compounds. Comparing the TGA results for the pristine BC film and the composites with various CeO2 contents, it is noticeable that intense decomposition processes shifted to lower temperatures as ceria concentration increased. The deterioration in the thermal stability of the samples was accompanied by a decrease in the indices τ5 and τ10 (the temperature values at which a polymer or a composite loses 5% and 10% of its initial weight, respectively, due to thermal destruction processes) (Table 1).
A detrimental effect of CeO2 on the thermal stability of BC is evident from the DTA curves of the nanocomposite films (Figure 4b). Indeed, an increase in ceria concentration from 0 to 5 wt.% led to a gradual shift of exothermic peaks toward the low-temperature region, the peaks being ascribed to the heat effect of thermal destruction. In accordance with previously reported data [40,41], the thermo-oxidative destruction of BC and BC-based nanocomposites occurred in two steps (two peaks on the DTA curves corresponding to these steps are in the 300–330 °C and 420–480 °C temperature regions). The increase in ceria content is seen to result in both a shift of the exothermic peaks to lower temperatures and a redistribution of the peak heights: a low-temperature peak became higher, whilst a high-temperature peak tended to become lower and smoother. In accordance with the well-known scheme of cellulose destruction—the Broido–Shafizadeh model [42]—the main reaction taking place in the low-temperature region (up to 350 °C) is the thermally stimulated decomposition of cellulose macrochains, resulting in the formation of monomeric and oligomeric fragments (the so-called “sirup” fraction). At the next (high-temperature) stage, these fragments decompose further, producing a variety of gaseous products. Based on the results obtained in the experiments on which this paper reports, it can be inferred that CeO2 causes deep depolymerization of BC, and full decomposition of the oligomers into monomers during the first stage of the destruction, thus facilitating the second stage.
It is worth mentioning that all of the aforementioned processes start at temperatures higher than 180–200 °C, and this should be taken into account when thermally sterilizing nanocomposite BC-ceria materials for biomedical applications.

3.5. Mechanical Properties

The successful practical use of the composite materials devised requires certain mechanical characteristics of the films they form. The mechanical properties of the BC-ceria composite materials with different CeO2 content are summed up in Table 2.
The data given in Table 2 reveal both the high stiffness (Young’s moduli of all the materials are higher than 5 GPa) and good strength characteristics (mechanical strength reaches 100–110 MPa) of the films. The incorporation of ceria in the BC matrix is seen to lead to a gradual (as CeO2 concentration grows) increase in the elastic modulus (5 wt.% of CeO2 augment the modulus by 27%). Such a pronounced rise in stiffness cannot be attributed to the reinforcing action of the nanofiller on BC matrix, as CeO2 nanoparticles, which have quasi-spherical shapes (aspect ratio is ~1) and are taken in rather small amounts, do not provide a reinforcing effect. A sensible explanation is that additional links between the BC macrochains form via the active surface of the nanoparticles when the nanocomposite is fabricated. It should also be pointed out that ceria does not cause a substantial decrease in the ultimate deformation of the films. This confirms the good compatibility between both components of the nanocomposites.

3.6. Ability to Swell in Water

The discussion above concerns the mechanical properties of dry films (according to TGA, water content is ~2.0–2.5%). However, the capability of a material to absorb water is of crucial importance in a number of practical applications, including biomedicine. Therefore, the current study considered the impact of ceria upon this property of the BC films.
It is evident from the swelling curves (Figure 5) that the films demonstrated a limited ability to swell in aqueous media, viz. the ultimate amount of water in the matrix BC in a swollen state was only 3.25 times higher than the weight of the dry polymer. Apparently, such a limited ability to swell is determined by the characteristics of the intermolecular bonds formed during fabrication of the films.
A fairly interesting phenomenon observed in the experiments was the fall in the ultimate amount of water in a swollen material as CeO2 content increased (Figure 5). This observation corroborates the hypothesis about additional intermolecular interactions, the CeO2 nanoparticles acting as links. A similar reduction in the degree of swelling in water was observed in nanocomposite films consisting of a mixture of chitosan with cellulose acetate filled with CeO2 nanoparticles [43].
An assessment of the mechanical properties of the swollen films is important in the context of the practical use of the materials. A technique was developed for performing mechanical tests on the swollen samples. Their mechanical characteristics are shown in Table 2. The results show explicitly that, even in an extremely swollen state, the films possessed a certain mechanical rigidity. The elastic moduli of the samples fell to 0.03–0.04 of that of a dry film but were of the same order of magnitude as the modulus of the LDPE film (170–300 MPa). It should be pointed out that a less pronounced decrease in the elastic modulus caused by swelling was registered in the nanocomposite films in comparison with the pristine BC sample. Such a trend was observed as ceria concentration in the material was augmented: the ratio of the elastic modulus of a film in a fully swollen state, to that of a dry film increased from 0.032 to 0.044 when the CeO2 content changed from 0 to 5 wt.% (Table 2). This clearly reflects a gradual decrease in the degree of swelling of the films with a rise in the concentration of the nanoparticles in the BC matrix. Despite a fairly significant drop in stiffness, the swollen films were characterized by a mechanical strength of 4–6 MPa, the strength being high enough for the material to be used in some biomedical applications.

3.7. MSC Proliferation

Among the possible applications of BC-ceria nanocomposite materials, their use in bioengineering as scaffolds for the proliferation of stem cells seems to be very promising. One of the main, and most auspicious, prospects for steady progress in modern medicine is associated with the development, and improvement, of the technology for growing cells of this kind. BC is known to be an interesting and promising material in the manufacture of such substrates [31,32,33,44]. This is due to the peculiarities of the structure of the material, its excellent biocompatibility combined with its high bioresorption ability, its non-cytotoxicity, and the possibility of its preparation in an extra-pure state. There were good reasons to combine such merits of BC matrices with those inherent in ceria in biological systems.
Experiments were carried out on MSC proliferation on substrates made of bare BC and nanocomposites containing up to 5 wt.% of CeO2. Figure 6 shows the data on mouse MSC proliferation activity on the surface of bacterial cellulose, the latter containing various concentrations of CeO2 nanoparticles. The results were recorded on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day of cultivation under fluorescent light.
The CeO2-containing scaffolds demonstrated good adhesion with the mouse MSC. It is well known that the adhesion of cells to the scaffold surface is strongly affected by the micro-relief and texture of the latter [45]. The addition of CeO2 nanoparticles to the BC matrix is supposed to create a surface structure that is most suitable for the formation of focal contacts of the cell filopodia, followed by the protrusion of the cell front. A certain electric charge on the scaffold surface also ensures optimal conditions for proliferation [43]. In the case of BC-CeO2 nanocomposite materials, the electric charge might be provided by the nanoparticles [46].
The adhesive characteristics of the composite scaffolds differ considerably, depending on ceria content. The minimum concentration of the nanoparticles (1 wt.%) provided adhesion for a substantial part of the cell culture; however, after 24 h, morphological features of the cells differed from those on the reference substrate. In particular, the cells did not exhibit the characteristic protrusions and formed multicellular aggregates, whose size decreased with an increase in ceria concentration in the scaffold. This might be explained by weak surface micro-relief, as well as by insufficient adhesion in initial sites for the formation of a fully-fledged extracellular matrix. Further cultivation on the scaffolds demonstrated that the cells spread effectively on the substrate even at small CeO2 concentrations. This process, however, took longer than that on the scaffolds with 3 and 5 wt.% of ceria.
It should be pointed out that the scaffolds with high concentrations of CeO2 nanoparticles (3 and 5 wt.%) exhibited notably higher cell viability after 96 h of cultivation than the scaffolds with 0 and 1 wt.% of the nanoparticles. The quantity of cells on these scaffolds was also substantially higher than that of the reference sample (cover glass). Thus, it can be inferred that ceria nanoparticles embedded in a scaffold ensure an increase in the rate of mouse MSC proliferation. This confirms the stimulating action of the hybrid scaffolds in comparison with those with no ceria. No difference was observed between the substrates with high CeO2 concentrations and the reference sample, at the early stages of cultivation (12 and 24 h), but longer cultivation periods demonstrated the well-defined stimulating effect of the former.
SEM images of the mouse MSC on the surface of BC film, with maximal content of CeO2 nanoparticles on the 4th day of cultivation, are shown in Figure 7, and can be compared to those cultivated on bare BC and glass substrate.
Analysis of the SEM images reveals the developed surface microstructure of the scaffolds. Long-term cultivation (96 h) resulted in migration and proliferation activity of the mouse MSC on the hybrid CeO2-containing substrates. This is evident from the formation of more focal contacts, as well as from an increase in the protrusion area. The cell monolayer formed on the BC substrates with high CeO2 concentrations (3–5 wt.%) had morphological features typical of actively dividing cells, these features being less pronounced for scaffolds containing 0 and 1 wt.% of ceria.
Quantitative analysis of the number of cells adhered to CeO2-containing scaffolds showed that all the scaffolds provided effective cell adhesion. The analysis of proliferative activity was carried out during four days of cultivation by resazurin test (Figure 8). After 48 h of cultivation, the CeO2-containing scaffolds provided a significant increase in the number of cells, which was confirmed by increased values of resazurin fluorescence. The results obtained show a dose-dependent effect of ceria-containing substrates on cell culture proliferation.
The molecular mechanisms of stimulation of MSCs proliferation in the presence of cerium dioxide nanoparticles are associated with the regulation of MSCs redox status in particular; nanoceria reduces the level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), and a high ROS concentration inhibits the rate of proliferation. Most likely, biological activity of nanoceria with regard to MSCs is connected to mixed cerium valence state in cerium dioxide nanoparticles [29]. For example, nanoceria has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties [47]; the treatment with nanoceria reduced both the level of IL-6 and inflammatory markers in the blood of mice in both in vitro and in vivo experiments [27]. Enhanced bone regeneration due to the activation the ERK signaling pathway by nanoceria has been also reported [28]. In our manuscript, using the PCR-RT, we confirm the contribution of cerium oxide to the acceleration of the MSCs proliferation through the regulation of genes associated with antioxidant enzymes (Figure 9a).
The polymerase chain reaction method (PCR-RT) was used to study the expression of gene clusters (panel of 93 genes) encoding antioxidant enzymes (the family of glutathione peroxidases and peroxiredoxins) and genes involved in the regulation of ROS methabolism (SOD-1, SOD-2, catalase, and thioredoxins, etc.). We also analyzed the genes responsible for mitochondrial dysfunction, as this is the main cellular organoid involved in ROS formation. These genes are responsible for the activation of a number of cascade pathways, including apoptosis, necrosis, antioxidant system, differentiation, proliferative and migration activities, the repair system, and pro-inflammatory response. PCR-RT was used to study the cells cultured on substrates containing 0 and 5% CeO2 (Figure 9). After 24 h of cultivation, activation was observed for peroxiredoxin groups, and genes PRDX1, NCF1, Nos2, Tro, Noxo1, Noxa1, AOX1, FTH1, Ngb, and Nqo1. After 96 h of cultivation, NCF1, Tro, Noxa1, FTH1, and Nqo1 also retained a high level of expression. According to PCA analysis (Figure 9b), ceria-containing substrates demonstrated a significant difference in gene expression pattern in comparison with ceria-free substrates. The CeO2-containing scaffolds significantly increased the integral index of the upregulation in the expression pattern of the selected genes, which indicates a positive effect of ceria-modified scaffolds for the metabolic microenvironment and MSCs redox status.
To summarize, it can be inferred that MSC proliferation proceeds more effectively on the scaffold with the highest CeO2 concentration used in the study, i.e., 5 wt.%. Such a scaffold is characterized by a water absorption value that is high enough to ensure nutrient exchange capacity, and that is sufficient to enable intense proliferation. It may be assumed that a further increase in ceria content would facilitate a stimulating activity of the scaffold, its high biodegradability, and the maintenance of cytoneutrality.

4. Conclusions

A method of fabrication of BC-CeO2 composite films has been proposed and implemented to prepare biologically active materials capable of enduring mechanical stress. A combination of XRD and SEM analyses corroborated the uniform distribution of the nanoparticles in the BC matrix. Simultaneous TGA and DTA revealed the pronounced catalytic activity of ceria regarding the thermo-oxidative destruction processes in BC-based nanocomposites.
The materials obtained exhibited a limited ability to swell in an aqueous medium, the addition of ceria to the BC matrix causing a decrease in the equilibrium concentration of water in the swollen films. The water content changed from 325 to 210% of a dry sample’s mass with a change from the bare BC to the film with 5 wt.% of ceria.
CeO2 nanoparticles imparted BC films with enhanced stiffness, the maximum value of the latter being observed in the nanocomposite with 5 wt.% of the filler (27% higher than that of the unfilled BC film). Such an increase in stiffness of the material, along with a decrease in its ability to swell, points to the additional intermolecular interactions via the active surfaces of CeO2 nanoparticles. The swollen films have a stiffness that is equal to 0.03–0.04 of that of the dry films, the elastic moduli and strength values being 170–300 MPa and 4–6 MPa, respectively. Such characteristics are similar to those of a number of human tissues, such as muscles, cartilages, and ligaments [48].
It was concluded, after examination of the nanocomposite materials regarding their use as bioresorbable scaffolds for the mouse MSC proliferation, that ceria positively affected the cells’ attachment to a substrate, followed by their growth. The ceria-containing scaffolds possess a high degree of adhesion with regard to the stem cells via the formation of the focal contact of cell filopodia on their surface. The scaffold with the highest CeO2 concentration (5 wt.%) demonstrated the best cell viability after 96 h of cultivation. A cell monolayer formed on this substrate had morphological features typical of an actively dividing culture. The number of cells on the composite substrates was considerably higher than that on a reference sample (glass substrate). Thus, it can be inferred that the stem cells proliferate faster in the presence of CeO2 nanoparticles. This confirms the stimulating effect of the hybrid substrates compared to the bare BC. The nanocomposite sample with 5 wt.% of ceria was characterized by a water absorption value that is considered to be high enough to provide the good nutrient exchange capacity needed for intensive cell proliferation. BC-based composites containing 5% CeO2 provided upregulation of the main clusters of genes responsible for proliferation, migration, metabolism of reactive oxygen species, and downregulation of proapoptotic, proinflammatory and mitochondrial dysfunction genes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13121999/s1, Table S1: Selected gene groups for PCR-RT analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.V.G. and A.L.N.; methodology, I.V.G., A.K.K., E.M.I., S.O.S., A.L.P. and A.E.B.; validation, A.L.N. and E.M.I.; formal analysis, A.L.N., I.V.G. and A.V.Y.; investigation, I.V.G., A.L.N., E.M.I., A.S.S., D.P.R., A.L.P., A.M.E., S.O.S. and A.E.B.; resources, A.V.Y., A.L.N., S.O.S., P.M.B. and A.E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.V.G. and A.L.N.; writing—review and editing, I.V.G., A.L.N., A.V.Y., A.L.P. and V.K.I.; supervision, P.M.B., A.V.Y. and V.K.I.; project administration, A.V.Y. and V.K.I.; funding acquisition, A.V.Y. and P.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (state contract No. 14.W03.31.0014, MegaGrant). Cell experiments were performed under RFBR grant No. 20-33-70236.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics and biosafety committee of Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics Russian Academy of Sciences, Permission No. 30/2021 of 9 February 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable. No previously reported data were analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank research associates from the Department of Microbiology, St. Petersburg State University, for providing us with bacterial cellulose.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rojas, O.J. (Ed.) Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 271, ISBN 978-3-319-79875-2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Esa, F.; Tasirin, S.M.; Rahman, N.A. Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2014, 2, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Mitrofanov, R.Y.; Budaeva, V.V.; Sakovich, G.V. Preparation and properties of bacterial cellulose gel films. Chem. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 503–508. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gromovykh, T.I.; Sadykova, V.S.; Lutcenko, S.V.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; Feldman, N.B.; Danilchuk, T.N.; Kashirin, V.V. Bacterial cellulose synthesized by Gluconacetobacter hansenii for medical applications. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2017, 53, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bäckdahl, H.; Helenius, G.; Bodin, A.; Nannmark, U.; Johansson, B.R.; Risberg, B.; Gatenholm, P. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2141–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Feng, X.; Ullah, N.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Li, C.; Bai, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Z. Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hanseniiCGMCC 3917. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, E2217–E2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shah, N.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khattak, W.A.; Park, J.K. Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: A multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 1585–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nainggolan, H.; Gea, S.; Bilotti, E.; Peijs, T.; Hutagalung, S.D. Mechanical and thermal properties of bacterial-cellulose-fibre-reinforced Mater-Bi® bionanocomposite. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Buyanov, A.; Gofman, I.; Revel’Skaya, L.; Khripunov, A.; Tkachenko, A. Anisotropic swelling and mechanical behavior of composite bacterial cellulose–poly(acrylamide or acrylamide–sodium acrylate) hydrogels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 3, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smyslov, R.Y.; Ezdakova, K.V.; Kopitsa, G.P.; Khripunov, A.K.; Bugrov, A.N.; Tkachenko, A.; Angelov, B.; Pipich, V.; Szekely, N.K.; Baranchikov, A.; et al. Morphological structure of Gluconacetobacter xylinus cellulose and cellulose-based organic-inorganic composite materials. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 848, 12017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shah, P. Advancement in Packaging Film Using Microcrystalline Cellulose and TiO2. Am. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. 2017, 3, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bouadjela, S.; Abdoune, F.Z.; Benmoussa, N.; Mechernene, L.; Rahmoun, K.; Maschke, U. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on polymer network formation. Spectrosc. Lett. 2017, 50, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tamayo, L.; Azócar, M.; Kogan, M.; Riveros, A.; Páez, M. Copper-polymer nanocomposites: An excellent and cost-effective biocide for use on antibacterial surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 69, 1391–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mallakpour, S.; Darvishzadeh, M. Ultrasonic treatment as recent and environmentally friendly route for the synthesis and characterization of polymer nanocomposite having PVA and biosafe BSA-modified ZnO nanoparticles. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 2174–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shcherbakov, A.; Reukov, V.; Yakimansky, A.; Krasnopeeva, E.; Ivanova, O.; Popov, A.; Ivanov, V. CeO2 Nanoparticle-Containing Polymers for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lu, Z.; Mao, C.; Meng, M.; Liu, S.; Tian, Y.; Yu, L.; Sun, B.; Li, C.M. Fabrication of CeO2 nanoparticle-modified silk for UV protection and antibacterial applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 435, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, K.-Q.; Kuang, C.-X.; Zhong, M.-Q.; Shi, Y.-Q.; Chen, F. Synthesis, characterization and UV-shielding property of polystyrene-embedded CeO2 nanoparticles. Opt. Mater. 2013, 35, 2710–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mullins, D.R. The surface chemistry of cerium oxide. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2015, 70, 42–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tiefensee, F.; Becker-Willinger, C.; Heppe, G.; Herbeck-Engel, P.; Jakob, A. Nanocomposite cerium oxide polymer matching layers with adjustable acoustic impedance between 4 MRayl and 7 MRayl. Ultrasonics 2010, 50, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, R.-P.; Wang, C.-F.; Zheng, K.-S.; He, X.-Y.; Huang, M.-S. Preparation, characterization, and properties of CeO2/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2015, 34, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shang, Z.; Lü, C.; Lü, X.; Gao, L. Studies on syntheses and properties of novel CeO2/polyimide nanocomposite films from Ce(Phen)3 complex. Polymers 2007, 48, 4041–4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zholobak, N.M.; Ivanov, V.K.; Shcherbakov, A.B. Chapter 12—Interaction of nanoceria with microorganisms. In Nanobiomaterials in Antimicrobial Therapy; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 419–450. ISBN 978-0-323-42864-4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zholobak, N.M.; Shcherbakov, A.B.; Vitukova, E.O.; Yegorova, A.V.; Scripinets, Y.V.; Leonenko, I.I.; Baranchikov, A.; Antonovich, V.P.; Ivanov, V. Direct monitoring of the interaction between ROS and cerium dioxide nanoparticles in living cells. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 51703–51710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiao, X.; Song, H.; Zhao, H.; Bai, W.; Zhang, L.; Lv, Y. Well-redispersed ceria nanoparticles: Promising peroxidase mimetics for H2O2 and glucose detection. Anal. Methods 2012, 4, 3261–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Popov, A.L.; Zaichkina, S.I.; Popova, N.R.; Rozanova, O.M.; Romanchenko, S.P.; Ivanova, O.S.; Smirnov, A.A.; Mironova, E.V.; Selezneva, I.I.; Ivanov, V.K. Radioprotective effects of ultra-small citrate-stabilized cerium oxide nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 106141–106149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shcherbakov, A.B.; Zholobak, N.M.; Spivak, M.; Ivanov, V. Advances and prospects of using nanocrystalline ceria in cancer theranostics. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 59, 1556–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Selvaraj, V.; Nepal, N.; Rogers, S.; Manne, N.D.P.K.; Arvapalli, R.; Rice, K.M.; Asano, S.; Fankhanel, E.; Ma, J.J.; Shokuhfar, T.; et al. Inhibition of MAP kinase/NF-kB mediated signaling and attenuation of lipopolysaccharide induced severe sepsis by cerium oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2015, 59, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lu, B.; Zhu, D.-Y.; Yin, J.-H.; Xu, H.; Zhang, C.-Q.; Ke, Q.-F.; Gao, Y.-S.; Guo, Y.-P. Incorporation of cerium oxide in hollow mesoporous bioglass scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration by activating the ERK signaling pathway. Biofabrication 2019, 11, 025012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. You, M.; Li, K.; Xie, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhen, X. The Effects of Cerium Valence States at Cerium Oxide Coatings on the Responses of Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Macrophages. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 179, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shcherbakov, A.B.; Zholobak, N.M.; Ivanov, V.K. Cerium and cerium oxide: A brief introduction. In Cerium Oxide (CeO₂): Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Scirè, S., Palmisano, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Khan, S.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Ikram, M.; Subhan, F.; Kim, Y.; Jang, J.H.; Yoon, S.; Park, J.K. Engineered regenerated bacterial cellulose scaffolds for application in in vitro tissue regeneration. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 84565–84573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, C.; Cao, J.; Zhao, S.; Luo, H.; Yang, Z.; Gama, M.; Zhang, Q.; Su, D.; Wan, Y. Biocompatibility evaluation of bacterial cellulose as a scaffold material for tissue-engineered corneal stroma. Cellulose 2020, 27, 2775–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhong, M.; Li, J.; Tang, A.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, D.; Peng, M.; Zhang, R.; Xiong, G.; Wan, Y.; Fan, H. A facile green approach for fabricating bacterial cellulose scaffold with macroporous structure and cell affinity. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2019, 34, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Buyanov, A.L.; Revel’Skaya, L.G.; Kuznetzov, Y.P.; Shestakova, A.S. Cellulose-poly(acrylamide or acrylic acid) interpenetrating polymer network membranes for the pervaporation of water-ethanol mixtures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ivanova, O.S.; Shekunova, T.O.; Ivanov, V.; Shcherbakov, A.B.; Popov, A.L.; Davydova, G.A.; Selezneva, I.I.; Kopitsa, G.P.; Tret’Yakov, Y.D. One-stage synthesis of ceria colloid solutions for biomedical use. Dokl. Chem. 2011, 437, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kriegner, D.; Matěj, Z.; Kužel, R.; Holý, V. Powder diffraction in Bragg–Brentano geometry with straight linear detectors. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ivanova, L.A.; Ustinovich, K.B.; Khamova, T.V.; Eneyskaya, E.V.; Gorshkova, Y.E.; Tsvigun, N.V.; Burdakov, V.S.; Verlov, N.A.; Zinovev, E.V.; Asadulaev, M.S.; et al. Crystal and Supramolecular Structure of Bacterial Cellulose Hydrolyzed by Cellobiohydrolase from Scytalidium Candidum 3C: A Basis for Development of Biodegradable Wound Dressings. Materials 2020, 13, 2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Balta-Calleja, F.J.; Vonk, C.G. X-ray Scattering of Synthetic Polymers; Polymer Science Library 8; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; 317p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Carltonbird, M.; Eaimsumang, S.; Pongstabodee, S.; Boonyuen, S.; Smith, S.M.; Luengnaruemitchai, A. Effect of the exposed ceria morphology on the catalytic activity of gold/ceria catalysts for the preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gao, M.; Wu, W.H.; Wu, F.C. Thermal degradation and smoke suspension of cotton cellulose modified with THPC and its lanthanide metal complexes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 98, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Silva, M.; Lopes, O.; Colodette, J.L.; Porto, A.; Rieumont, J.; Chaussy, D.; Belgacem, M.N.; Silva, G.G. Characterization of three non-product materials from a bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp mill, in view of valorising them as a source of cellulose fibres. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2008, 27, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bradbury, A.G.W.; Sakai, Y.; Shafizadeh, F. A kinetic model for pyrolysis of cellulose. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1979, 23, 3271–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kalaycıoğlu, Z.; Kahya, N.; Adımcılar, V.; Kaygusuz, H.; Torlak, E.; Akın-Evingür, G.; Erim, F.B. Antibacterial nano cerium oxide/chitosan/cellulose acetate composite films as potential wound dressing. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 133, 109777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Svensson, A.; Nicklasson, E.; Harrah, T.; Panilaitis, B.; Kaplan, D.; Brittberg, M.; Gatenholm, P. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vesel, A.; Junkar, I.; Cvelbar, U.; Kovac, J.; Mozetic, M. Surface modification of polyester by oxygen- and nitrogen-plasma treatment. Surf. Interface Anal. 2008, 40, 1444–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Asati, A.; Santra, S.; Kaittanis, C.; Perez, J.M. Surface-Charge-Dependent Cell Localization and Cytotoxicity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5321–5331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Shcherbakov, A.B.; Zholobak, N.M.; Ivanov, V.K. Biological, biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of cerium oxide. In Cerium Oxide (CeO2): Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Scirè, S., Palmisano, L., Eds.; Metal Oxides Series; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chang, H.-I.; Wang, Y. Cell Responses to Surface and Architecture of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. In Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering—Cells and Biomaterials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of the samples studied: (a) bare BC; (bd) BC-ceria nanocomposite films containing 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 5 wt.% CeO2, respectively.
Figure 1. SEM images of the samples studied: (a) bare BC; (bd) BC-ceria nanocomposite films containing 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 5 wt.% CeO2, respectively.
Polymers 13 01999 g001aPolymers 13 01999 g001b
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the films: (a) bare BC; (bd) BC-ceria nanocomposites with 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 5 wt.%, respectively, (e) X-ray diffraction pattern of ceria nanoparticles. Arrows in XRD patterns of the composite samples indicate CeO2 reflections.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the films: (a) bare BC; (bd) BC-ceria nanocomposites with 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 5 wt.%, respectively, (e) X-ray diffraction pattern of ceria nanoparticles. Arrows in XRD patterns of the composite samples indicate CeO2 reflections.
Polymers 13 01999 g002aPolymers 13 01999 g002b
Figure 3. (a) An example of the EDX spectrum of the composite BC-CeO2 sample; SEM images (left side) and EDX maps of cerium distribution (right side) on the surface of the BC-ceria nanocomposite samples with: (b,c) 1 wt.% CeO2; (d,e) 5 wt.% CeO2.
Figure 3. (a) An example of the EDX spectrum of the composite BC-CeO2 sample; SEM images (left side) and EDX maps of cerium distribution (right side) on the surface of the BC-ceria nanocomposite samples with: (b,c) 1 wt.% CeO2; (d,e) 5 wt.% CeO2.
Polymers 13 01999 g003
Figure 4. (a) TGA and (b) DTA curves of bare BC film and nanocomposite films containing different amounts of ceria.
Figure 4. (a) TGA and (b) DTA curves of bare BC film and nanocomposite films containing different amounts of ceria.
Polymers 13 01999 g004
Figure 5. Swelling kinetics of bare BC and BC-CeO2 nanocomposite films.
Figure 5. Swelling kinetics of bare BC and BC-CeO2 nanocomposite films.
Polymers 13 01999 g005
Figure 6. Fluorescence microscopy images of mouse MSC with GFP gene on the surface of the substrates.
Figure 6. Fluorescence microscopy images of mouse MSC with GFP gene on the surface of the substrates.
Polymers 13 01999 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of the scaffolds after 96 h of mouse mesenchymal stem cells cultivation. (a,b) The reference sample (cover glass); (c,d) bare BC film; and (e,f) BC with 5 wt.% of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 7. SEM images of the scaffolds after 96 h of mouse mesenchymal stem cells cultivation. (a,b) The reference sample (cover glass); (c,d) bare BC film; and (e,f) BC with 5 wt.% of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Polymers 13 01999 g007
Figure 8. Viability of mouse MSC culture after cultivation on CeO2-containing BC scaffolds for 96 h. Data are presented as the mean value ± SD. Cover glass was used as a control. **** p < 0.0001 via control.
Figure 8. Viability of mouse MSC culture after cultivation on CeO2-containing BC scaffolds for 96 h. Data are presented as the mean value ± SD. Cover glass was used as a control. **** p < 0.0001 via control.
Polymers 13 01999 g008
Figure 9. Heat map of gene expression in mouse MSC, cultured on 0% and 5% CeO2-containing scaffolds, after 24 and 96 h of cultivation. (a) The intensity scale of the standardized expression values ranges from −3 (green: low expression) to +3 (red: high expression, with 1:1 intensity value (black) representing the control (nontreated). Principal component analysis (PCA) of qRT-PCR data for different concentrations of CeO2 scaffold (b). Cluster groups of genes and their functionality.
Figure 9. Heat map of gene expression in mouse MSC, cultured on 0% and 5% CeO2-containing scaffolds, after 24 and 96 h of cultivation. (a) The intensity scale of the standardized expression values ranges from −3 (green: low expression) to +3 (red: high expression, with 1:1 intensity value (black) representing the control (nontreated). Principal component analysis (PCA) of qRT-PCR data for different concentrations of CeO2 scaffold (b). Cluster groups of genes and their functionality.
Polymers 13 01999 g009
Table 1. Thermal stability indices of the BC and BC-ceria nanocomposite films.
Table 1. Thermal stability indices of the BC and BC-ceria nanocomposite films.
Sampleτ5, °Cτ10, °C
BC286302
BC + 1 wt.%CeO2283298
BC + 3 wt.%CeO2272291
BC + 5 wt.% CeO2261281
Table 2. Mechanical characteristics of bare BC and BC-CeO2 composite films.
Table 2. Mechanical characteristics of bare BC and BC-CeO2 composite films.
CompositionE, GPaEswollen/Edry 1σb, MPaεb, %
BC5.5 ± 0.3 101 ± 53.6 ± 0.2
BC, swollen0.17 ± 0.020.0324.2 ± 0.42.9 ± 0.2
BC + 1 wt.% CeO25.8 ± 0.3 96 ± 32.7 ± 0.2
BC + 1 wt.% CeO2, swollen0.20 ± 0.020.0343.6 ± 0.32.6 ± 0.3
BC + 3 wt.% CeO26.3 ± 0.3 107 ± 33.3 ± 0.2
BC + 3 wt.% CeO2, swollen0.24 ± 0.020.0384.4 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.1
BC + 5 wt.% CeO26.9 ± 0.4 113 ± 53.3 ± 0.2
BC + 5 wt.% CeO2, swollen0.30 ± 0.030.0445.8 ± 0.32.8 ± 0.2
1 Eswollen/Edry is the ratio of the elastic modulus of a film with a given composition in a fully swollen state, to that of a dry film.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gofman, I.V.; Nikolaeva, A.L.; Khripunov, A.K.; Ivan’kova, E.M.; Shabunin, A.S.; Yakimansky, A.V.; Romanov, D.P.; Popov, A.L.; Ermakov, A.M.; Solomevich, S.O.; et al. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Nanocomposites Containing Ceria and Their Use in the Process of Stem Cell Proliferation. Polymers 2021, 13, 1999. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121999

AMA Style

Gofman IV, Nikolaeva AL, Khripunov AK, Ivan’kova EM, Shabunin AS, Yakimansky AV, Romanov DP, Popov AL, Ermakov AM, Solomevich SO, et al. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Nanocomposites Containing Ceria and Their Use in the Process of Stem Cell Proliferation. Polymers. 2021; 13(12):1999. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gofman, Iosif V., Alexandra L. Nikolaeva, Albert K. Khripunov, Elena M. Ivan’kova, Anton S. Shabunin, Alexander V. Yakimansky, Dmitriy P. Romanov, Anton L. Popov, Artem M. Ermakov, Sergey O. Solomevich, and et al. 2021. "Bacterial Cellulose-Based Nanocomposites Containing Ceria and Their Use in the Process of Stem Cell Proliferation" Polymers 13, no. 12: 1999. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop