Next Article in Journal
Acoustic Emission-Based Study to Characterize the Crack Initiation Point of Wood Fiber/HDPE Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Super-Toughened Poly(lactic Acid) with Poly(ε-caprolactone) and Ethylene-Methyl Acrylate-Glycidyl Methacrylate by Reactive Melt Blending
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Stability, Fire Performance, and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibre Fabric-Reinforced Polymer Composites with Different Fire Retardants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spectral Properties of PMMA Films Doped by Perylene Dyestuffs for Photoselective Greenhouse Cladding Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Surface Properties of Aramid Fiber Modified in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide by Glycidyl-POSS

1
Department of Polymer Material and Engineering, College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
School of Materials Science and Metallurgy Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550003, China
3
School of Physics and Electronic Science, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(4), 700; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040700
Submission received: 6 March 2019 / Revised: 27 March 2019 / Accepted: 8 April 2019 / Published: 17 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
The outstanding diffusivity and permeability of supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) are extremely beneficial for grafting reaction. In this work, aramid fibers (AF) are modified in scCO2 by glycidyl-polyhedral oliomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) with 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole (2E4MZ) on the basis of cleaning with acetone. The surface morphology and chemical structure of the modified AF were measured and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Thermogravimetric (TG), and Atomic force microscope (AFM). The interfacial shear strength (IFSS) was measured by a micro-bond pull-out test, then the modified AF/EP composites were prepared and the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) was characterized. Research has shown that some of the glycidyl-POSS molecular chains permeated into the surface of the fiber and grafted onto the surface of the AF after modification, and the other glycidyl-POSS self-assembled on the surface of the fiber. XPS indicated the introduction of C–O and –COO–, which confirmed the existence of chemical reactions between AF and glycidyl-POSS. AFM and SEM images revealed that 2E4MZ, not only promoted the grafting reaction of glycidyl-POSS, but also intensified the self-assembly of glycidyl-POSS, both of which increased the roughness of the fiber. A monofilament tensile test and micro-bond pull-out test showed that there was a negative effect on the tensile strength after scCO2 processing. The tensile strength of modified AF, with glycidyl-POSS, increased the highest strength of 25.7 cN dtex−1, which was 8% higher than that of pristine AF. The improvement of ILS roughness and the polar chemical groups produced in grafting reaction. These results indicated that AF, treated in scCO2, with glycidyl-POSS, which is a suitable way of fiber modification, can significantly improve the surface adhesion of AF reinforced composites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aramid fiber (AF), also called aromatic polyamide fiber, is a new type of high performance industrial fiber with high modulus, high strength, low density, high temperature resistance, low elongation at a break and low lag loss. However, AF has disadvantages, such as surface smoothness, high crystallinity, and low chemical activity, which result in weak interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix materials [1,2,3]. Therefore, the development of novel and effective modification technology, to improve interfacial adhesion, is an issue. In order to improve the surface adhesion between fibers and matrix materials, two ways were used for AF modification. One was a physical method [4,5], and the other was chemical modification. The commonly used chemical modification methods include surface grafting [6,7], surface modification by plasma [8,9], and ultrasonic infiltration [10]. The surface coating as a physical method has been widely used because of simple equipment and convenient operation.
Glycidyl-polyhedral oliomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) is one such hybrid material that possesses both organic and inorganic properties. The chemical structure of these organic groups of glycidyl-POSS can interact with amino and carboxyl [11]. For non-reactive inorganic groups, glycidyl-POSS can show compatibility between the POSS molecule and matrix materials. Because of the high crystallinity on the surface layer of AF, it is difficult for glycidyl-POSS to penetrate into the surface layer of the fiber. Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) not only has great solubility and permeability, but also has a relatively high diffusion coefficient, which caused the polymers and fibers to bulge [8,12]. The study on AF modification in scCO2 processing by an interfacial reaction between glycidyl-POSS and the polar groups on AF surface has not yet been reported. Traditional surface coating treatment makes it difficult for surface treatment agent to penetrate the surface of aramid fiber. Moreover, stress concentration is easily caused by the uneven grafting point in the process of chemical grafting, which reduces the tensile strength of single fibers [13]. Therefore, it is necessary to find an auxiliary process in the coating treatment and chemical grafting treatment.
Various studies have been carried out in characterizing POSS reinforced materials. These have included studying the formation of nanoscale structures [7,11], the synthesis of novel POSS molecules with different functionalities [14,15], and the enhancement of physical properties [12,16,17]. However, limited work has been reported on the effects of glycidyl-POSS (catalyst is 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole, 2E4MZ) on grafting modification of AF and reinforcements for the mechanical properties of epoxy resin matrix. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to investigate the modification effect of glycidyl-POSS on AF in scCO2 and study the effects on mechanical properties of epoxy resin reinforced by AF.

2. Surface Treatment Process and Characterization

2.1. Materials

The polymer system, used in this work, consists of glycidyl-POSS (EP0409, PassKey Instrument Co. Ltd, Changsha, China) and 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole (2E4MZ, Shikoku Chemical Corporation, Shikoku, Japan). Aramid fiber (AF-1000, 1500D) was produced by South Alkex Company, Seoul, Korea. Epoxy resin (EP), E44, ShangHai Resin Factory Co., LTD (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Preparation of Modified Aramid Fiber

Cleaning process of aramid fiber: Aramid fibers (AF-1000, 1500D; Seoul, Korea) used in this study was produced by South Alkex Company with 0–0.3% surface sizing agent, as stated by manufacturer. The sizing agent on the surface of AF is used to make the fibers antistatic to help with processing and handling. In order to eliminate the effect of sizing agent on grafting reaction, all samples were washed with acetone and rinsed with ethanol and dried in vacuum before surface treatment.
Preparation of samples: The AF was uniformly mixed with 5 wt % glycidyl-POSS (Chemical structure of glycidyl-POSS is shown in Figure 1a solution (the dosage of 2E4MZ was 5wt % of glycidyl-POSS mass), ultrasonic processing was used in a beaker at 25 °C for 10 min, then scCO2 processing was operated (10 MPa, 50 °C, 30 min), left to dry in an oven at 150 °C for 1 h. A large number of fibers may stick together during the processing. The fiber bundles were overturned and scattered before the heat treatment process to prevent fibers forming bundles. The schematic drawing of glycidyl-POSS-AF is shown in Figure 1b. After the graft processing, the specimens were removed from the container, rinsed with acetone to remove the unreacted glycidyl-POSS on the fiber surface and then dried. The schematic diagram of sample processing and grafting diagram are respectively shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, the samples obtained by different treatment methods are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Characterizations

The surface chemical modification of the modified AF was studied using FT-IR (Nicolet 8700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which provided the information about various chemical bonds. TGA was performed on the Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA, Q50, DuPont, Delaware, MD, USA) in nitrogen at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min. The samples were analyzed in the range of 80–800 °C. XRD analyses were performed by using a diffractometer with the type of X Pert PRO from Panalytical, Netherlands. Test conditions are following: Cu-Ka radiation, tube voltage with 40 KV, tube current with 40 mA. Scan range from 10 to 40, scan rate with 2/min. In addition, the XPS tests were conducted by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo fisher Scientific, K-Alpha+, Waltham, MA, USA). The microstructure of the samples was studied by using field emission scanning electron microscopy (Sirion 200, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Atomic force microscopy (Bruker, Dimension, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to examine the fiber surface in more detail.

2.4. Measurements of the Interfacial Shear Strength (IFSS)

In order to investigate how processing affects the interfacial shear strength, specimens were made using AF and a certain amounts of epoxy resin E44 (5 wt % 2E4MZ as a curing agent). The micro-bond pull-out test was carried out on a Single Filament Testing device XQ-1 (Shanghai New Fiber Instrument Co. LTD., Shanghai, China) [12]. After specimens were mounted (shown in Figure 4), the bottom fixture was adjusted to make it grip the micro-droplet resin at the bottom. The upper clamping device clamped the fiber and then a steady displacement was applied to pull out of the single fiber from the epoxy droplets with a displacement rate of 10 mm/min. The diameter (D) and embedding length (L) of the fibers were measured by Inverted Metallographic Microscope (Axio Observer Z1m, Zeiss, Germany). The test was conducted at room temperature, and the maximum load causing debonding was measured. For each group, 20 samples were tested and averaged. Assuming the IFSS is approximately constant along the entire interface, then the average IFSS can be calculated from the following Equation (1):
τ = F d π DL
where τ is the average IFSS, Fd is the maximum load of interfacial failure, D is the fiber diameter, and L is the embedded length.

2.5. Measurements of the Interlaminar Shear Strength (ILSS)

To investigate how the treatment affects the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), the ILSS of AF reinforced epoxy composites before and after modification was tested according to ASTM D2344 by using a universal tensile machine (5882, NKKN). The samples were made using AF (10 wt % ± 0.2) and a certain amount of epoxy resin E44 (4 wt % 2E4MZ as a curing agent). The specimens were prepared by moulding, and the pressure and temperature are 10 MPa, and 100 °C, respectively, the pressure holding time is 1 h. For each group, average value was determined from five different samples. The ILSS were calculated by Equation (2):
ILSS = 0.75 × P m b × h
where Pm (N) is the maximum load during the test, b (mm) is the measured specimen width, and h (mm) is the measured specimen thickness.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FTIR and XPS

Figure 5 shows the FT-IR spectra of AF before and after modification. The peaks of the AF untreated (AF0) appeared at 3316 cm−1 (–NH, derived from hydrogen bond association state), 1636 cm−1 (stretching vibration of –C=O, Amide I band), 1540 cm−1 (curved vibration of –N–H), 1307 cm−1 (bending vibration of –N–H) [17,18,19]. The peak of hydrogen bonds nearby 3310 cm−1 was broader and moved to a lower wave-number, which made it clear that the hydrogen bond between the surface molecular chains was weaker after cleaning and coating during scCO2 processing. These indicated that scCO2 can destroy the surface structure of AF to some extent [11,12]. The peaks around 2900 cm−1, which derive from –CH– and–CH2– indicated a good dispersion of glycidyl-POSS on the AF surface. In addition, the Si–O–Si stretching peak may be masked by AF peaks between 1095 cm−1 and 1118 cm−1, which exhibited that glycidyl-POSS was well-consumed in the surface of AF after scCO2 processing. Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the mechanism of grafting reaction. Under the action of scCO2, the amino and carboxyl groups on the surface of aramid fiber were released. Carboxyl and amino groups attacked the oxygen and carbon atoms of epoxy groups respectively, so that glycidyl-POSS were opened and grafted (Figure 6). Firstly, for 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole, the third nitrogen atom on the imidazole ring opened the epoxy group, the hydrogen atoms which connect with para-nitrogen atoms caused hydrogen proton transfer and then reacted with the epoxy group to form a 1:2 addition production. Then, the oxygen anion, generated by the epoxy ring opening, continued to catalyze the ring opening polymerization of the epoxy group. This effect does not only promote the self-polymerization of POSS, but also improves the reaction rate of epoxy group with amino and carboxyl groups. (Figure 7).
To confirm the success of surface modification, XPS tests were conducted. The changes in the chemical structure of the specimens, induced by the scCO2, can be observed by analyzing the XPS spectra. The wide scan and C1s core-level spectra of AF before, and after, modification represented in Figure 8, and the results of the analysis were shown in Table 2 and Table 3. As shown in Figure 8a,c,e,g, the wide scan spectrum of AF before, and after modification, showed the same peak components of C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s ascribed to the existence of C, N, and O elements on the surface. As shown in Figure 8(b-1), compared with the theoretical value of N/O for untreated AF (AF0), the oxygen content increased after high temperature processing (O/N = 1.34, AF0 but treated at 150 °C for 1 h), which is consistent with the reported in literature. [20] The content of oxygen increased after scCO2 processing (O/N = 1.20, Table 2). The O/C value of CO2 was much higher than in AF0, indicating that after scCO2 processing, CO2 infiltrated into the surface molecular chain of AF in some way [11,12]. The oxygen content of AF2 increased after coating treatment (O/N = 2.54), which proves that glycidyl-POSS has been successfully coated onto the surface of AF. In the same conditions, the oxygen content of AF3 (O/N = 6.08) further increased after using 2E4MZ, which proved that a mass of glycidyl-POSS has been successfully coated onto the surface of AF.
Presented in Figure 8b,d, the C1s core-level spectrum of AF can be curve-fitted with four peak components, whose binding energies located at 288 eV for C=O species, 284.6 eV for C=C species, 286.3 eV for C–N species and 285.3 eV for C–C species [3,9]. In the C1s spectra of AF2 and AF3 there were two more species at the binding energy of about 286 eV and 289 eV assigning to C–O and –COO–, as reported in the literature [14,21]. From the perspective of molecular structure, COO– is only derived from the reaction of glycidyl-POSS with terminal carboxyl groups and the SCCO2 processing. C–O not only comes from POSS molecules, but is also derived from the reaction of glycidyl-POSS with terminal amino groups. By further comparing the C1s core-level spectrum of each specimen Figure 8b,d,f,h, a significant change occurred at 286–288 eV. This suggested that the infiltration of the scCO2, on the fiber surface, is not only a physical permeation but may also be accompanied by a chemical reaction [12]. Meanwhile, the data in Table 3 indicated that, after using 2E4MZ, the content of C–O increased to 21.74%, but the change of –COO– was not obvious. This phenomenon further confirms that the grafting reaction and self-assembly of glycidyl-POSS occur simultaneously.

3.2. XRD Results

To clarify the effect of grafting treatment on the surface structure of fibers, XRD measurements were carried out and the X-ray diffractograms in the 2θ range 10° to 40° are shown in Figure 9. It was found that two distinct characteristic diffraction peaks appeared nearby 2θ = 20.0°, 23.8°, which correspond to [110] and [200], indicating that the crystal type of AF does not change after surface cleaning and surface grafting treatment with glycidyl-POSS solution [9,12].
In order to obtain the effect of the treatment process on the structure and crystallinity of AF, the XRD pattern of every specimen was determined in Table 4 by using the curve fitting and normalization method. Table 4 showed the crystal angle value corresponding to the location of each characteristic diffraction peak of AF. After the scCO2 processing, the 2θ value slightly shifted to a lower angle in Table 4, indicating that the interplanar spacing of modified AF had increased, and the stacked density of microcrystals had decreased after scCO2 processing [12]. After scCO2 processing, the crystallinity of the AF1 were 77.10% with a significant drop, which was associated with the destruction of the surface molecular chain. Whether coated or being grafted, the degree of disorder of molecular chains on the fiber surface would increase. Compared with the untreated AF0, the crystallinity of AF3 reduced to 74.54%, which was related to the coated glycidyl-POSS on the surface of fiber.

3.3. TG and DTG

Figure 10 showed the TG and DTG curves of aramid fiber before, and after, modification. Although TG curves in Figure 10a showed that there are no distinct difference in AF0 and AF1, AF2 and AF3 had a pyrolysis characteristic in a lower temperature (nearby 150 °C). Meanwhile, both AF1 and AF2 showed an obvious second-order thermogravimetric mechanism, but AF3 showed only a first-order thermogravimetric mechanism and the thermal properties of the fibers improved after glycidyl-POSS (+2E4MZ) processing. These phenomena can be explained as follows [12]: After scCO2 processing, the surface structure of the fibers was loosened, the degradation mechanism changed, and the thermal properties decreased. The looser surface structures were favorable for the permeation of glycidyl-POSS, this penetration contributed to the grafting and coating of POSS.
In detail, the pyrolysis characteristic near 150 °C can be attributed to the evaporation of absorbed water and remained glycidyl-POSS (or 2E4MZ). There was almost no weight change within 100–450 °C for AF0 and AF1. According to the analysis of the mass residual rate, the mass residual rate of AF1 is 8.4% lower than in AF0, which may be the residual organic solvent in the processing. By comparing AF1 and AF2, we can draw a clear conclusion that, whether the attachment is a graft product or self-polymerization product, only a little of glycidyl-POSS can attach onto the fiber surface after scCO2 processing. Using 2E4MZ can promote the grafting and coating of glycidyl-POSS (AF3). 10.7 wt % residues were the glycidyl-POSS which grafted or coated on the surface of the fibers.

3.4. Surface Morphology of the Aramid Fibers

The surface morphologies of the specimens were observed by SEM, just as shown in Figure 11 the AF0 displayed a smooth surface, and there was almost no obvious concave and convex structure. As shown in Figure 11(a-T), after high temperature treatment (AF0 but treated at 150 °C for 1 h), there is almost no change on the surface of the fibers. Nevertheless, a significant change has taken place on AF1 after scCO2 processing, even part of the surface structure of the fiber was obviously broken. For comparison, the SEM images of AF2 and AF3, which were without scCO2 processing, are also listed in Figure 11c,e. It can be clearly seen that a small amount of glycidyl-POSS adhered onto the surface before scCO2 processing Figure 11e. After using 2E4MZ, part of glycidyl-POSS penetrated into the fiber through the looser surface, while self-assembly and grafting reactions of glycidyl-POSS occurred on the surface and adhered onto the surface of the fiber. The surface of the fiber was densely coated with a layer of glycidyl-POSS, and the roughness of fibers changed.

3.5. Atomic Force Microscopy

The microscopic morphology on the fibers surface was examined with AFM. These images revealed the changes in surface structure of the specimens due to scCO2 processing clearly. The details of the roughness of different samples were examined and shown in Table 5. It can be observed intuitively that the surface of AF0 was relatively flat, and the roughness was a commensurate lower value. After treatment with scCO2 Figure 12b, there were obvious protrusions and grooves, and the roughness value increased significantly. However, after modifying in scCO2 with glycidyl-POSS Figure 12c,d, the surface morphology has changed greatly. The corresponding Ra and Rq increased to 136.54 and 112.41 nm respectively. In particular, 2E4MZ as a curing accelerator can effectively promote glycidyl-POSS self-assembly and graft on fiber surface.

3.6. Monofilament Tensile Strength

It can be seen in Figure 13 that the strength of AF1 decreased by 14.28% after scCO2 processing, which was directly related to the looser surface structure. The decrease in the tensile strength of the fiber after high temperature treatment is related to the change of its surface structure [3,22]. The scCO2 molecules which diffused into the surface of the fiber would improve the movement capacity of the fiber segments in some extent, and the segments would be adjusted, rearranged and even recrystallized. These molecular chains generated stress concentration under the action of stress, thus resulting in the decline of fiber filament strength [11,12]. Nanosized glycidyl-POSS permeated into the surface of the fiber under the action of scCO2 (AF2), which can reduce the damage of scCO2 to the fiber. As a curing accelerator, 2E4MZ promoted the ring-opening reaction and the grafting (or self-assembly) of glycidyl-POSS on the fiber surface, which was favorable for the improvement of fiber mechanical properties (AF3). Compared with AF0, the tensile strength of AF3 increased 8% to 25.7 cN·dtex−1.

3.7. The Mechanical Performance

To evaluate the influence of the grafted AF on the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), the composites which were made of epoxy and AF treated with different type of processing were tested by inserting a grafted fiber layer in the AF/epoxy composites. The results of the micro-bond pull-out test and the measurement of the ILSS were both shown in Figure 14. As shown, the ILSS of AF1 reduced in comparison with AF0 (from 65.6 to 58.5 MPa), and the weakening of interlaminar shear strength well-correlated with the IFSS (from 18.90 to 16.79 MPa). While AF2 exhibited a higher ILSS (70.85 MPa) than that of AF0, ILSS of AF3 reached a new plateau of 84.26 MPa using 2E4MZ, as observed in Table 6. After scCO2 processing, the epoxy resin (epoxy micro-droplet) can easily penetrate the surface molecular chain of the fiber, the abundant carboxylic acids and amine functional groups could provide many reactive anchoring sites for the cross-linking of the epoxy resin, thus increasing adhesion performance. Moreover, a large number of glycidyl-POSS grafted (or self-assembly) on the surface of the fiber, improved the level of roughness after using 2E4MZ, and was critical for the adhesion. Although the value of IFSS in our research was not better than that of the processing of macromolecules grafting on the aramid fiber (increased by 34%) [1,3], the ILSS also increased significantly with the increase of IFSS. The increment of ILSS (25.33%) was much higher than the reports in the literature (14.7%) [23], which showed that the aramid fiber was modified according to our processing of aramid fiber-reinforced composites, which exhibited better properties.
To further evaluate the ILSS of fiber/epoxy composites, the impact fractured surfaces were examined under SEM. The fracture of AF0 is perfectly flat, as well as the fiber surface, and there was no adhesive epoxy resin on the fiber surface. Due to the action of scCO2, the roughness of AF1 increased and the surface structure was destroyed. The fiber was torn under an external force impact Figure 15b. This indicated that the decrease of ILSS was mainly caused by the decrease of single fiber strength, not adhesion [21,24,25,26,27]. After glycidyl-POSS processing, the polarity of AF2 increased and more epoxy resin was adhered to the fiber surface Figure 15c. On the fractured surface of AF3 Figure 15d, many epoxy debris still adhered, which confirms the strong interfacial adhesion between AF3 and the epoxy matrix.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a new and simple solution dipping method, using glycidyl-POSS as a modifier to modify AF, and the AF/EP micro-bond pull-out test, were evaluated. The results showed that scCO2 processing can destroy the surface structure of the fiber to a certain extent, which is beneficial to the permeation and grafting of glycidyl-POSS. This method can effectively improve the roughness and polarity of AF. XPS showed the introduction of C–O and –COO–, which confirmed the existence of chemical reactions between groups. 2E4MZ not only promoted the grafting reaction of glycidyl-POSS but also intensified the self-assembly, both of which increased the roughness of the fiber. The ILSS of the modified AF/EP composites increased 25.33% to reach at 84.26 MPa. These results indicated that AF treated in scCO2 with glycidyl-POSS and 2E4MZ, which is a suitable way of fiber modification, can significantly improve the surface cohesiveness of AF reinforced composites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L.; methodology, Y.L.; software, L.Y.; validation, X.L.; investigation, K.X.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, X.L.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Science Foundation of Guizhou Province (Qian Ke He Ji Chu [2019] 1134), Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Youth Talent Growth Project (Qian Jiao He KY [2016] 225), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51763004), and Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Youth Talent Growth Project (Qianjiaohe KY [2017] 208).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luo, L.; Wu, P.; Cheng, Z.; Hong, D.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; Liu, X. Drect fluorination of para-aramid fiber 1: Fluorination reaction process of PPTA fiber. J. Fluor. Chem. 2016, 186, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Palola, S.; Sarlin, E.; Kolahgar Azari, S.; Koutsos, V.; Vuorinen, J. Microwave induced hierarchical nanostructures on aramid fibers and their infuence on adhesion properties in a rubber matrix. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 410, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, Z.; Chen, C.; Huang, J.Y.; Chen, T.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.Y. Nondestructive grafting of PEI on aramid fiber surface through the coordination of Fe (III) to enhance composite interfacial properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 401, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xing, L.X.; Liu, L.; Huang, Y.D.; Jiang, D.W.; Jiang, B.; He, J.M. Enhance interfacial properties of domestic aramid fiber-12 via high energy gamma ray irradiation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 69, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, J.R.; Zhu, Y.F.; Ni, Q.Q.; Fu, Y.Q.; Fu, X. Surface modification and characterization of aramid fibers with hybrid coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 321, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, J.; Dai, Y.Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.Y.; Yao, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, X.Y. Effects of diferent fluorination routes on aramid fiber surface structures and interlaminar shear strength of its composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 270, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, P.F.; Wojnarowska, Z.; Hong, T.; Carroll, B.; Li, B.R.; Feng, H.B.; Parsons, L.; Wang, W.Y.; Lokitz, B.S.; Cheng, S.W.; et al. A star-shaped single lithium-ion conducting copolymer by grafting a POSS nanoparticle. Polymer 2017, 124, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yuan, H.; Wang, W.C.; Yang, D.Z.; Zhou, X.F.; Zhao, Z.L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Feng, J. Hydrophilicity modification of aramid fiber using a linear shape plasma excited by nanosecond pulse. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 344, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jia, C.X.; Chen, P.; Liu, W.; Li, B.; Wang, Q. Surface treatment of aramid fiber by air dielectric barrier discharge plasma at atmospheric pressure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 4165–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.X.; Du, M.J.; Lv, C.; Zhou, Q.Q.; Ren, Y.; Liu, G.L.; Jin, L.M. Surface modification of aramid fiber by plasma induced vapor phase graft polymerization of acrylic acid.I. Influence of plasma conditions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 349, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mishra, K.; Pandey, G.; Singh, R.P. Enhancing the mechanical properties of an expoxy resin using polyhedral oliomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) as nano-reinforcement. Polym. Test. 2017, 62, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jing, X.D.; Han, Y.T.; Zheng, L.J.; Zheng, H.D. Surface wettability of supercritical CO2—ionic liquid processed aromatic polyamides. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 27, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Shi, Y.X.; Chen, S.X.; Wang, W.C.; Tian, M.; Ning, N.Y.; Zhang, L.Q. Highly efficient mussel-like inspired modification of aramid fibers by UV-accelerated catechol/polyamine deposition followed chemical grafting for high-performance polymer composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Walczak, M.; Januszewski, R.; Franczyk, A.; Marciniec, B. Synthesis of monofunctionalized POSS through hydrosilylation. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 872, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Romo-Uribe, A. Viscoelasticity and microstructure of POSS-methyl methacrylate nanocomposites. Dynamics and entanglement dilution. Polymer 2018, 148, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Misasi, J.M.; Jin, Q.F.; Knauer, K.M.; Morgan, S.E.; Wiggins, J.S. Hybrid POSS-Hyperbranched polymer additives for simultaneous reinforcement and toughness improvements in epoxy neyworks. Polymer 2017, 117, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, C.X.; Wu, G.S.; Jiang, H. Tuning interfacial strength of silicone resin composites by varying the grafting density of octamaleamic acid-POSS modified onto carbon fiber. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 109, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, S.; Sun, G.X.; Cheng, X.D.; Dai, H.M.; Chen, X.F. Nanoporous SiO2 grafted aramid fibers with low thermal conductivity. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 146, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xing, L.X.; Liu, L.; Xie, F.; Huang, Y.D. Mutual irradiation grafting on indigenous aramid fiber-3 in diethanolamine and epichlorohydrin and its effect on interfacially reinforced epoxy composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 375, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cai, H.; Shen, D.; Yuan, L.; Guan, Q.B.; Gu, A.J.; Liang, J.Z. Developing thermally resistant polydopamine@nano turbostratic BN@CeO2 double core-shell ultraviolet absorber with low light-catalysis activity and its grafted high performance aramid fibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 452, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, B.; Duan, Y.G.; Zhang, J.J. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles-coated aramid fiber showing enhanced interfacial strength and UV resisitance properties. Mater. Des. 2016, 103, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ding, X.M.; Kong, H.J.; Qiao, M.M.; Hu, Z.F.; Yu, M.H. Effect of different pressures on microstructure and mechanical performance of F-III fibers in supercritical carbon dioxide fluid. Materials 2019, 12, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cheng, Z.; Han, Y.T.; Luo, L.B.; Liu, X.Y. Grafting degradable coordination polymer on aramid fiber surface to improve its interfacial properties. Mater. Lett. 2018, 233, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, F.H.; Wang, R.G.; He, X.D.; Wang, C.; Ren, L.N. Interfacial shearing strength and reinforcing mechanisms of an epoxy composite reinforced using a carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hybrid. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 3574–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, L.; Hu, Z.; Wu, Z.J.; Wu, G.S.; Ma, L.C.; Zhang, C.H.; Huang, Y.D. POSS-bound ZnO nanowires as interphase for enhancing interfacial strength and hydrothermal aging resistance of PBO fiber/epoxy resin composites. Compos. Part A 2017, 96, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.W.; Zhao, F.; Song, Y.J.; Li, J.; Hu, Z.; Huang, Y.D. Interfacial microstructure andproperties of poly(phenylene benzobisoxazole) fiber grafted with grapheme oxide via solvothermal method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 266, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cao, K.; Siepermann, C.P.; Yang, M.; Waas, A.M.; Kotov, N.A.; Thouless, M.D.; Arruda, E.M. Reactive aramid nanostructures as high-performance polymeric buildingblocks for advanced composites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2072–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of glycidyl-POSS. (b) Schematic drawing of glycidyl-POSS-AF.
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of glycidyl-POSS. (b) Schematic drawing of glycidyl-POSS-AF.
Polymers 11 00700 g001
Figure 2. Diagram of glycidyl-polyhedral oliomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) grafting on aramid fibers (AF) preparation process.
Figure 2. Diagram of glycidyl-polyhedral oliomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) grafting on aramid fibers (AF) preparation process.
Polymers 11 00700 g002
Figure 3. Scheme of the modification process.
Figure 3. Scheme of the modification process.
Polymers 11 00700 g003
Figure 4. Micro-droplet test.
Figure 4. Micro-droplet test.
Polymers 11 00700 g004
Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of aramid fiber before and after treatment.
Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of aramid fiber before and after treatment.
Polymers 11 00700 g005
Figure 6. The terminal group reaction between aramid fiber and glycidyl-POSS.
Figure 6. The terminal group reaction between aramid fiber and glycidyl-POSS.
Polymers 11 00700 g006
Figure 7. Self-assembly of glycidyl-POSS.
Figure 7. Self-assembly of glycidyl-POSS.
Polymers 11 00700 g007aPolymers 11 00700 g007b
Figure 8. XPS wide scan and C 1s core-level spectra of AF before and after modification. (a), (b): AF0; (a-1), (b-1): AF0-T; (c), (d): AF1; (e), (f): AF2; (g), (h): AF3.
Figure 8. XPS wide scan and C 1s core-level spectra of AF before and after modification. (a), (b): AF0; (a-1), (b-1): AF0-T; (c), (d): AF1; (e), (f): AF2; (g), (h): AF3.
Polymers 11 00700 g008aPolymers 11 00700 g008b
Figure 9. XRD patterns of AF before and after modification.
Figure 9. XRD patterns of AF before and after modification.
Polymers 11 00700 g009
Figure 10. (a) TG and (b) DTG curves of aramid fiber before and after modification.
Figure 10. (a) TG and (b) DTG curves of aramid fiber before and after modification.
Polymers 11 00700 g010
Figure 11. SEM images of aramid fiber before and after modification. ((a) AF0; (b) AF1; (c) AF2 without scCO2 processing; (d) AF2; (e) AF3 without scCO2 processing; (f) AF3; (a-T): AF0 sample were treated under 150 °C for 1 h).
Figure 11. SEM images of aramid fiber before and after modification. ((a) AF0; (b) AF1; (c) AF2 without scCO2 processing; (d) AF2; (e) AF3 without scCO2 processing; (f) AF3; (a-T): AF0 sample were treated under 150 °C for 1 h).
Polymers 11 00700 g011
Figure 12. AFM image (3 × 3 μm2) of AF before and after modification. ((a) AF0; (b) AF1; (c) AF2; (d) AF3).
Figure 12. AFM image (3 × 3 μm2) of AF before and after modification. ((a) AF0; (b) AF1; (c) AF2; (d) AF3).
Polymers 11 00700 g012
Figure 13. Tensile strength of aramid fiber before and after processing.
Figure 13. Tensile strength of aramid fiber before and after processing.
Polymers 11 00700 g013
Figure 14. The mechanical performance of aramid fiber/epoxy with different processing. ((a) the interfacial shear strength; (b) the interlaminar shear strength).
Figure 14. The mechanical performance of aramid fiber/epoxy with different processing. ((a) the interfacial shear strength; (b) the interlaminar shear strength).
Polymers 11 00700 g014
Figure 15. SEM images of AF/EP composites before and after modification. (a) AF0; (b) AF1; (c) AF2; (d) AF3.
Figure 15. SEM images of AF/EP composites before and after modification. (a) AF0; (b) AF1; (c) AF2; (d) AF3.
Polymers 11 00700 g015
Table 1. Sample number and treatment method.
Table 1. Sample number and treatment method.
SamplesTreatment Method
AF0Untreated
AF0-TAF0 sample were treated under 150 °C for 1 h.
AF1Only scCO2 processing then washed and dried.
AF2Soaked in glycidyl-POSS solution at 25 °C for 10 min and then treated in scCO2, left to treat in an oven at 150 °C for 1 h, then washed and dried.
AF3soaked in glycidyl-POSS solution (+5% 2E4MZ) at 25 °C for 10 min and then treated in scCO2, left to treated in an oven at 150 °C for 1 h, then washed and dried.
Table 2. Relative chemical composition and atomic ratios determined by XPS for AF before and after processing.
Table 2. Relative chemical composition and atomic ratios determined by XPS for AF before and after processing.
SampleChemical Composition (%)Atomic Ratio
C 1sO 1sN 1sSiC/NO/N
AF0 AF0-T77.16 83.4012.12 9.5110.72 7.090 06.36 11.71.13 1.34
AF183.509.017.49011.141.20
AF272.4915.986.285.2511.542.54
AF366.1317.892.9413.0422.496.08
Table 3. Results of deconvolution of C 1s for aramid fiber before and after processing.
Table 3. Results of deconvolution of C 1s for aramid fiber before and after processing.
SampleRelative Area of Different Chemical Bonds (%)
C–C and C=CO=C–N–H(C=O, C–N)C–O–COO–
AF0 AF0-T88.15 81.5511.85 18.450 00 0
AF182.5417.4600
AF279.9316.842.490.74
AF368.328.8621.741.08
Table 4. Comparison of crystalinity structure parameters of aramid fiber before and after treatment.
Table 4. Comparison of crystalinity structure parameters of aramid fiber before and after treatment.
Sample2θ (°)D (nm)FWHM (°)Xs (nm)Xc (%)
[110][200][110][200][110][200]
AF020.7223.034.273.851.6291.6994.882.16
AF120.3422.634.363.921.4391.5895.477.10
AF220.3022.604.353.911.4281.5635.680.05
AF320.1522.354.414.031.4191.5126.174.54
Xc—crystallinity; d (nm)—interplanar spacing; Xs—average crystallite size.
Table 5. Surface roughness of aramid fiber before and after processing.
Table 5. Surface roughness of aramid fiber before and after processing.
SampleAF0AF1AF2AF3
Rq/nm6.7732.2654.55136.54
Ra/nm4.9729.4941.47112.41
Table 6. The interfacial shear strength (IFSS)/interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) value of different specimen.
Table 6. The interfacial shear strength (IFSS)/interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) value of different specimen.
Micro-Droplet SampleIFSS (MPa)ILSS (MPa)Increase (Compared with AF0 IFSS/ILSS)
AF018.90 ± 1.0265.63 ± 2.140/0
AF116.79 ± 0.7058.51 ± 2.46−11.16%/−10.84%
AF221.10 ± 1.5070.85 ± 2.5111.64%/7.95%
AF324.37 ± 1.2984.26 ± 3.7828.94%/25.33%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Luo, Z.; Yang, L.; Li, X.; Xiang, K. Study on Surface Properties of Aramid Fiber Modified in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide by Glycidyl-POSS. Polymers 2019, 11, 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040700

AMA Style

Li Y, Luo Z, Yang L, Li X, Xiang K. Study on Surface Properties of Aramid Fiber Modified in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide by Glycidyl-POSS. Polymers. 2019; 11(4):700. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040700

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yang, Zhu Luo, Le Yang, Xiaolong Li, and Kun Xiang. 2019. "Study on Surface Properties of Aramid Fiber Modified in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide by Glycidyl-POSS" Polymers 11, no. 4: 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040700

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop