Next Article in Journal
Emission Wavelength Control via Molecular Structure Design of Dinuclear Pt(II) Complexes: Optimizing Optical Properties for Red- and Near-Infrared Emissions
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Observation of Microwave Sintering-Induced Directional Pores in Lithium Cobalt Oxide for Vertical Microchannel Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Near-Infrared Reflective Nanopigments: Aesthetic and Cooling Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Dynamics Study of the Ni Content-Dependent Mechanical Properties of NMC Cathode Materials

Department of Mechanical, Robotics, and Energy Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2025, 15(3), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15030272
Submission received: 15 February 2025 / Revised: 12 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 15 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries)

Abstract

:
Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxides (NMCs) are widely used as cathode materials in commercial batteries. Efforts have been made to enhance battery energy density and stability by adjusting the element ratio. Nickel-rich NMC shows promise due to its high capacity; however, its commercial viability is hindered by severe capacity fade, primarily caused by poor mechanical stability. To address this, understanding the chemo-mechanical behavior of Ni-rich NMC is crucial. The mechanical failure of Ni-rich NMC materials during battery operation has been widely studied through theoretical approaches to identify possible solutions. The elastic properties are key parameters for structural analysis. However, experimental data on NMC materials are scarce due to the inherent difficulty of measuring the properties of electrode active particles at such a small scale. In this study, we employ molecular dynamics (MDs) simulations to investigate the elastic properties of NMC materials with varying compositions (NMC111, NMC532, NMC622, NMC721, and NMC811). Our results reveal that elasticity increases with nickel content, ranging from 200 GPa for NMC111 to 290 GPa for NMC811. We further analyze the contributing factors to this trend by examining the individual components of the elastic properties. The simulation results provide valuable input parameters for theoretical models and continuum simulations, offering insights into strategies for reducing the mechanical instability of Ni-rich NMC materials.

1. Introduction

The high energy density, fast charging, excellent reversibility, high power output, long lifespan, and environmental benefit of Li–ion batteries have resulted in their wide use in electric vehicles, portable devices, and energy storage systems [1,2,3]. As their role in daily life evolves, significant advances are being made in cycle life, energy density, and charging efficiency [4,5,6]. However, to accelerate the widespread adoption of electric vehicles and expand the applications of mobile technologies, further improvements need to be made [7,8]. Recent advancements in lithium-ion batteries have focused on enhancing energy density, cycle stability, and safety through material innovations and structural optimizations [9,10].
Due to its high stability and long lifespan, lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) has been widely used in the early stages of battery use, particularly in the cathodes of small portable devices [11,12]. However, the high cost and environmental concerns associated with LCO have resulted in the exploration of alternative materials [13,14]. Transition metal oxides, such as LiMn2O4 [15], LiFePO4 [16], and LiNiO2, have emerged as promising candidates. Each cathode material offers distinct advantages and limitations [17,18], e.g., LiNiO2 has been found to be difficult to develop and offers poor cyclability [19], while LiMnO2, after charge–discharge cycling, undergoes crystallographic transitions to a spinel structure [20].
There is significant potential to enhance performance through the doping of additional elements, leading to the development of ternary materials, such as LiNixMnyCo1−x−yO2 (NMC) [21,22] as a versatile alternative. Charge redistribution results in the oxidation states of transition metals in the NMC system differing from those in single-element transition metal oxides, like LiMO2 (where M = Ni3+, Co3+, or Mn3+). In the NMC cathode, each transition metal plays a distinct role; for example, nickel (Ni) participates in redox reactions to act as a double redox-active center that cycles between Ni2+, Ni3+, and Ni4+ [23,24,25]. Manganese (Mn) facilitates the reduction of some Ni3+ ions to Ni2+, which increases reversible capacity while enhancing structural stability during cycling [26,27]. Cobalt (Co) helps maintain a highly ordered and stable structure, remaining in the Co3+ state until all Ni has transitioned to Ni4+ during charge and discharge.
The capacity of NMC batteries is known to increase with higher Ni content. However, as the Ni content increases, the ratios of Mn and Co decrease, which decreases the structural stability compromise of the material. Although their superior capacity prompts Ni-rich NMC materials to be considered promising next-generation batteries, their commercialization is hindered by a rapid capacity fade, which is primarily caused by mechanical degradation [28]. Mechanical degradation leads to a loss of lithium storage space and an increase in side reactions, making it a key contributor to capacity fade [29,30,31].
Theoretical approaches, including the development of chemo-mechanical models, have been undertaken to address the mechanical degradation in Ni-rich NMC. A chemo-mechanical model considering the anisotropic feature of Ni-rich NMC has been proposed [32]. The numerical study on the coating effect of Ni-rich NMC particles showed that by accommodating the volume change in the particles, the coating effectively reduces stress [33]. The effects of grain size and the morphology of NMC811 have been investigated [34]. Particle damage is predicted from the effects of particle sizes and operating conditions [35]. The fracture behavior of single and polycrystalline NMC811 particles has been examined by introducing the cohesive zone model [36]. A chemo-mechanical damage model has been developed to study cracking inside polycrystalline NMC particles [37]. Mechanical properties are essential in numerical studies that use continuum models.
The wide range of transition metal combinations and doping strategies presents significant challenges for experimental studies that aim to determine the mechanical properties of NMC materials. Experimental setups are often difficult to manage and time-consuming. In contrast, computational approaches offer a viable solution to explore various phenomena across different material combinations and doping effects [38]. First-principle studies, which are commonly referred to as ab initio studies and often use density functional theory (DFT), offer a key computational technique for these investigations [39,40]. However, the limited number of atoms that can be modeled makes this approach less practical, particularly for studying dynamic behavior [41].
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is another computational approach that provides insights into atomic and molecular interactions within Li–ion batteries. This method can offer detailed information on key mechanisms that govern battery performance, including ion diffusion, phase transformations, and structural stability under various operating conditions. Unlike first-principle studies, MD simulations can deal with a large number of atoms, making them well-suited to capture dynamic phenomena at a larger scale.
Several MD simulation studies have been conducted to determine the mechanical properties of battery cathode materials. Lee et al. investigated the state of charge (SOC)-dependent elasticity of lithium manganese oxide (LMO) materials and showed that competing pair interactions modify the elasticity [42]. Tyagi et al. reported SOC-dependent Young’s modulus for LMO ranging (140 to 170) GPa [43]. The Lee group developed the second-nearest-neighbor-modified embedded-atom method (2NN MEAM) potential with charge equilibration (Qeq) for LMO and calculated the bulk modulus and SOC-dependent diffusivity [44]. They also developed 2NN MEAM potential with Qeq for LCO and calculated the bulk modulus and diffusivity of layered and spinel LCO [45]. Asadi et al. explored the SOC-dependent properties of LMO, reporting that as SOC decreases from (1 to 0), C11 increases from (145 to 170) GPa [46]. Classical MD simulations have been used to explore the structural properties and defect effect of layered NMC [47]. DFT studies have been performed to calculate the mechanical properties of NMC materials [48,49].
Notwithstanding that atomic simulation approaches have been widely used to investigate the material properties of battery materials, the data on NMC materials remain scarce. Cheng et al. measured the mechanical properties of LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 using nanoindentation [50]. Xu et al. measured the elastic modulus and hardness of LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 using nanoindentation on the polished surface of the synthesized NMC pellets [51]. Sharma et al. measured anisotropic mechanical properties of different composition NMC materials using nanoindentation [52]. The experimental measurements of electrode materials mostly use nanoindentation techniques, which indirectly assess elasticity by indenting the polished surface of sintered pellets.
This study seeks to calculate the elastic properties of NMC materials with a varying Ni content ratio. Understanding composition-dependent elasticity, particularly in Ni-rich NMC materials, provides essential data for higher-scale simulation studies that include finite elements simulations with continuum models.

2. Method

The NMC materials are transition metal oxides with Li–doping, encompassing both electrostatic and pairwise interactions. The total energy of the system can be described by the short-range interatomic interactions and the electrostatic energy due to charges. The Morse potential is employed to calculate the pairwise interactions [53,54]. The Morse function is commonly used for covalent bond interactions; its mathematical representation is written as follows:
E   =   D 0 e 2   α   ( r     r 0 ) 2 e   α   ( r     r 0 )
where D0 indicates the potential well depth, α denotes the width parameter, r is the distance between atoms, and r0 is the distance at equilibrium. Table 1 summarizes the parameters used in this study. The energy contribution for Coulombic interactions is calculated by
E = C q i q j ϵ r 2
where C represents the energy-conversion constant, qi and qj are the charges of two atoms, and ϵ denotes the dielectric constant. Since the battery operates through the intercalation and deintercalation of lithium ions, which involve significant electrostatic forces between the lithium and surrounding electrode material, the charge interactions are crucial.
The layered structure of NMC belongs to the R3m space group and features a hexagonal crystal structure [56,57,58]. This layered structure is thermodynamically stable and is usually obtained in the synthetic process. Figure 1a shows the unit cell made up of 360 atoms that we consider. The unit cell includes 90 lithium atoms, 180 oxygen atoms, and 90 transition metals of nickel, manganese, and cobalt, the latter of which are randomly placed in the unit cell. Figure 1b shows the super structure with 5760 atoms obtained for MD simulations by expansion of the unit cells through duplicating four units on the x-axis, two units on the y-axis, and two units on the z-axis. To remove the random effect of transition metals, five different structures where the transition metals are randomly mixed are generated, and the simulations are carried out for the five structures; all simulation results are then obtained by averaging the five random structures.
Five composition ratios of NMC111, NMC532, NMC622, NMC721, and NMC811 are considered in the LiNixMnyCo1−x−yO2 family. Table 2 summarizes the atomic composition ratios for the five materials. For nickel, both Ni2+ and Ni3+ are considered. As the ratio of nickel increases, the Ni3+ content is increased to maintain the system neutrality.
We employed LAMMPS [59], an open source simulation tool, for the MD simulations. First, the structures were equilibrated for 50 picoseconds (ps). Figure 2 shows that the potential energy of the structures is minimized and shows a stable state through the equilibrium process. After equilibration, a strain rate of 0.005 is applied to the structure in the x–, y–, and z–direction to calculate the stiffness of C11, C22, and C33, respectively.
Since long-range Coulombic force is typically stronger than short-range interactions, the atomic charges need to be scaled down to balance the long- and short-range interactions [60]. We calculated the C11 of NMC111 by changing atomic charges, then compared them with the available values in the literature; Table 3 summarizes the results. The stiffness calculated with 60% of formal charges shows good agreement. Therefore, all simulations in this study were carried out with 60% of formal charges. The partial charges used for the calculation of Coulombic interactions are summarized in Table 4.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Model Validation

To validate the accuracy of the model, we compare the lattice constants with the available values in the literature. The lattice constants were calculated by averaging the size of the equilibrated system over time. Table 5 summarizes the results. Although an excess of 3.6% at maximum is shown, they demonstrate good agreement overall. As the Ni ratio increases, the calculated lattice constants show a decreasing trend, most notably along the z-axis, in agreement with previous studies [48]. As the Ni ratio increases, the proportion of Ni3+ ions also increases, leading to stronger electrostatic interactions with neighboring O2−. This enhanced attraction draws the oxygen ions closer, resulting in a contraction of the lattice. Since nickel and oxygen ions are arranged in layers, this effect is pronounced along the z-axis.

3.2. Elastic Modulus

Figure 3a–c shows the stress–strain curves of all the selected compositions within the elastic range; the stiffness is determined by measuring the slope of the curves. Figure 3d then shows the calculated elasticities. C11 exhibits the largest value across all compositions, ranging from approximately 200 to 290 GPa for NMC111 to NMC811. C22 follows a similar trend with slightly lower values, ranging from 190 to 260 GPa for NMC111 to NMC811. C33 is significantly lower, which is expected, since atomic interactions in the layer direction are weaker than in the plane directions. As the Ni content increases, C33 also shows an increasing trend from (130 to 145) GPa for NMC111 to NMC811, although the difference is not significant.
The increased stiffness with higher Ni contents raises more possibility of the generation of larger stress in materials upon volume change due to lithiation/delithiation. Therefore, the simulation results suggest that the increase in stiffness with higher Ni contents can be a factor that contributes to the poor mechanical stability of Ni-rich NMC. In addition, the calculated elasticity ranges from 186.3 to 293.2 GPa, showing significant variation upon different compositions; this indicates that compositional tuning, particularly the manipulation of nickel content, can be an effective strategy to tailor the mechanical properties of NMC materials.

3.3. Component Analysis

The calculated stresses are decomposed to investigate the factors influencing the change in elasticity of different compositions. Figure 4 shows the three main contributions to stress of kinetic, long-range electrostatic, and pairwise interactions. The total stresses represent the stress values at 0.02 strain. Since the stress–strain curves start from zero, the component breakdown of specific stress can be used for that of stiffness. The decomposition shows the pairwise energy to be the predominant contributor to stiffness.
As the Ni3+ content increases, the Ni–O bond length shortens, strengthening local interactions. This increased bonding localization enhances charge neutralization and increases electrostatic screening over longer distances, thereby reducing long-range electrostatic interactions. As a result, the overall electrostatic stress contribution decreases from NMC111 to NMC811, while short-range pairwise interactions become more dominant.
The pairwise energy is further decomposed into atomic contributions of Li+, Ni2+, Ni3+, Mn4+, Co3+, and O2−. Figure 5 shows the contribution of each ion to stiffness. As the nickel content increases, the green and cyan curves increase, indicating that the two species of Ni3+ and O2− are primarily responsible for the increase in stress. As the nickel content increases, the charge of nickel increases, which enhances the repulsive forces between nickel ions and neighboring oxygen ions, resulting in an increase in the overall energy and consequently, the stress within the system. Although not as much as Ni3+, the contribution of Li+ also increases as Ni content increases. The shortened Ni–O bond length compacts the overall crystal structure, slightly reducing the spacing of Li+ and surrounding oxygen ions. As a result, Li+ experiences stronger short-range repulsions from surrounding Ni and O ions. This leads to a higher pairwise interaction contribution from Li+, even though its absolute number remains unchanged. This analysis highlights the intricate interplay between particle interactions and the resultant mechanical properties of these materials.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the change in the mechanical properties of NMC materials with Ni content. The elastic constants C11, C22, and C33 were computed for five different NMC compositions. NMC811, which contains the largest nickel content, exhibits the largest stiffness. Our decomposition analysis identified that the primary contributor to stress is the pairwise interaction, which is particularly influenced by the charge states of nickel and oxygen ions. As the nickel content increases, changes in ionic interactions result in the increase in repulsive forces, elevating the overall energy and stress in the system. The results provide useful data of the mechanical properties of NMC materials for continuum models of Li–ion batteries, while also emphasizing the effect of the composition on the mechanical properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and I.U.H.; methodology, I.U.H.; software, I.U.H.; validation, I.U.H.; formal analysis, I.U.H.; investigation, I.U.H.; resources, S.L.; data curation, I.U.H.; writing—original draft preparation, I.U.H.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; visualization, I.U.H.; supervision, S.L.; project administration, S.L.; funding acquisition, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, grant number 2022R1A2C1003003.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.-M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Scrosati, B.; Hassoun, J.; Sun, Y.-K. Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3287–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.-S. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Etacheri, V.; Marom, R.; Elazari, R.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, P.; Yu, H.; Li, D.; Zhou, H. Layered lithium transition metal oxide cathodes towards high energy lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 3680–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, L.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Ouyang, M. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, B.; Qian, D.; Wang, Z.; Meng, Y.S. Recent progress in cathode materials research for advanced lithium ion batteries. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2012, 73, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, Y.; Yang, C.; Yu, Y. A review on covalent organic frameworks for rechargeable zinc-ion batteries. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 108865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yao, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, P.; Fan, J.; Yang, X.; Jiang, W.; Jiang, S.; Dong, P.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, J.; et al. Local Electron Spin-State Modulation at Mn Site for Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries with Fast-Kinetic NaNi0.33Fe0.33Mn0.33O2 Cathode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 2419967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, J.; Yao, J.; Luo, L.; Zhou, Z.; Dong, P.; Xiao, W. In situ constructed MgO parclose-concerted fabrication of Silicon/carbon hybrids via a high-efficiency and expedited electrochemical process in molten salt. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 484, 149428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mizushima, K.; Jones, P.C.; Wiseman, P.J.; Goodenough, J.B. LixCoO2 (0 < x< −1): A new cathode material for batteries of high energy density. Mater. Res. Bull. 1980, 15, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kang, K.; Meng, Y.S.; Bréger, J.; Grey, C.P.; Ceder, G. Electrodes with high power and high capacity for rechargeable lithium batteries. Science 2006, 311, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mo, J.Y.; Jeon, W. The Impact of Electric Vehicle Demand and Battery Recycling on Price Dynamics of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathode Materials: A Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) Analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baum, Z.J.; Bird, R.E.; Yu, X.; Ma, J. Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling─Overview of Techniques and Trends. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thackeray, M.M.; Johnson, P.J.; de Picciotto, L.A.; Bruce, P.G.; Goodenough, J.B. Electrochemical extraction of lithium from LiMn2O4. Mater. Res. Bull. 1984, 19, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Padhi, A.K.; Nanjundaswamy, K.S.; Goodenough, J.B. Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997, 144, 1188–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, E.; He, L.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Liang, T.; Chen, Y.; et al. Structural and mechanistic revelations on high capacity cation-disordered Li-rich oxides for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 16, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stoyanova, R. Lithium/nickel mixing in the transition metal layers of lithium nickelate: High-pressure synthesis of layered Li[LixNi1−x]O2 oxides as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Solid State Ion. 2003, 161, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Capitaine, F. A new variety of LiMnO2 with a layered structure. Solid State Ion. 1996, 89, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Min, K.; Kim, K.; Jung, C.; Seo, S.-W.; Song, Y.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Shin, J.; Cho, E. A comparative study of structural changes in lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide as a function of Ni content during delithiation process. J. Power Sources 2016, 315, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, Y.-K.; Myung, S.-T.; Park, B.-C.; Prakash, J.; Belharouak, I.; Amine, K. High-energy cathode material for long-life and safe lithium batteries. Nat. Mater 2009, 8, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, J.; Jiao, L.F.; Yuan, H.T.; Li, H.X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.M. Effect of synthesis condition on the structural and electrochemical properties of Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2 prepared by the metal acetates decomposition method. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 3731–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hwang, B.J.; Santhanam, R.; Chen, C.H. Effect of synthesis conditions on electrochemical properties of LiNi1−yCoyO2 cathode for lithium rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 2003, 114, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Cai, P.; Peng, Z.; Zhou, Y. Effects of different carbonate precipitators on LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 morphology and electrochemical performance. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 117, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahn, W.; Lim, S.N.; Jung, K.-N.; Yeon, S.-H.; Kim, K.-B.; Song, H.S.; Shin, K.-H. Combustion-synthesized LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 as cathode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 609, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kosova, N.V.; Devyatkina, E.T.; Kaichev, V.V. Optimization of Ni2+/Ni3+ ratio in layered Li(Ni,Mn,Co)O2 cathodes for better electrochemistry. J. Power Sources 2007, 174, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, M.; Zhang, X.; Chung, M.; Less, G.B.; Sastry, A.M. A review of conduction phenomena in Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 7904–7929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, P.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, Y.; Bo, S.-H. Fracture behavior in battery materials. J. Phys. Energy 2020, 2, 022002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, M.; Park, J.; Sastry, A.M. Fracture Analysis of the Cathode in Li-Ion Batteries: A Simulation Study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iqbal, N.; Choi, J.; Lee, C.; Khan, A.; Tanveer, M.; Lee, S. A Review on Modeling of Chemo-mechanical Behavior of Particle–Binder Systems in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Multiscale Sci. Eng. 2022, 4, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Iqbal, N.; Lee, S. Anisotropic model to describe chemo-mechanical response of Ni-rich cathode materials. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2024, 269, 109034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Iqbal, N.; Choi, J.; Shah, S.F.; Lee, C.; Lee, S. Mathematical modeling and simulations of stress mitigation by coating polycrystalline particles in lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Math. Mech.-Engl. Ed. 2024, 45, 947–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Asheri, A.; Rezaei, S.; Glavas, V.; Xu, B.-X. Microstructure impact on chemo-mechanical fracture of polycrystalline lithium-ion battery cathode materials. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2024, 309, 110370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Taghikhani, K.; Weddle, P.J.; Berger, J.R.; Kee, R.J. A chemo-mechanical grain boundary model and its application to understand the damage of Li-ion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 080511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Taghikhani, K.; Weddle, P.J.; Hoffman, R.M.; Berger, J.R.; Kee, R.J. Electro-chemo-mechanical finite-element model of single-crystal and polycrystalline NMC cathode particles embedded in an argyrodite solid electrolyte. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 460, 142585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, Y.; Zhao, K.; Liu, Y.; Stein, P.; Xu, B.-X. A chemo-mechanical grain boundary model and its application to understand the damage of Li-ion battery materials. Scr. Mater. 2020, 183, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fergus, J.W. Recent developments in cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 939–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, L.; Lee, W.H.; Zhang, J. First Principles Study on the Electrochemical, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of LiCoO2 for Thin Film Rechargeable Battery. Mater. Today Proc. 2014, 1, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, L.; Zhang, J. Ab initio study of anisotropic mechanical properties of LiCoO 2 during lithium intercalation and deintercalation process. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 225101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Howey, D.A.; Roberts, S.A.; Viswanathan, V.; Mistry, A.; Beuse, M.; Khoo, E.; DeCaluwe, S.C.; Sulzer, V. Free Radicals: Making a Case for Battery Modeling. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 2020, 29, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, S.; Park, J.; Sastry, A.M.; Lu, W. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of SOC-Dependent Elasticity of LixMn2O4 Spinels in Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tyagi, R.; Srinivasan, S. Molecular dynamics modeling of lithium ion intercalation induced change in the mechanical properties of LixMn2O4. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 164712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, E.; Lee, K.-R.; Lee, B.-J. Interatomic Potential of Li–Mn–O and Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Li Diffusion in Spinel Li1– xMn2O4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 13008–13017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, E.; Lee, K.-R.; Lee, B.-J. An interatomic potential for the Li-Co-O ternary system. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 142, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Asadi, A.; Aghamiri, S.F.; Talaie, M.R. Molecular dynamics simulation of a LixMn2O4 spinel cathode material in Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 115354–115363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, S.; Park, S.S. Atomistic Simulation Study of Mixed-Metal Oxide (LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2) Cathode Material for Lithium Ion Battery. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6484–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, X.; Ding, X.; Xu, R. Anisotropic mechanical properties of LiNixMnyCo1-x-yO2 cathodes for Li-ion batteries: A first-principles theoretical study. Acta Mater. 2024, 267, 119751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, J.; Lin, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, T.; Zheng, J. Elastic Mechanics Study of Layered Li (NixMnyCoz)O2. PRX Energy 2024, 3, 013012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, E.J.; Hong, K.; Taylor, N.J.; Choe, H.; Wolfenstine, J.; Sakamoto, J. Mechanical and physical properties of LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 (NMC). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 3213–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, R.; Sun, H.; de Vasconcelos, L.S.; Zhao, K. Mechanical and Structural Degradation of LiNixMnyCozO2 Cathode in Li-Ion Batteries: An Experimental Study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sharma, N.; Meng, D.; Wu, X.; De Vasconcelos, L.S.; Li, L.; Zhao, K. Nanoindentation measurements of anisotropic mechanical properties of single crystalline NMC cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 2023, 58, 101920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pedone, A.; Malavasi, G.; Menziani, M.C.; Cormack, A.N.; Segre, U. A new self-consistent empirical interatomic potential model for oxides, silicates, and silica-based glasses. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110, 11780–11795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Verlet, L. Computer “Experiments” on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules. Phys. Rev. 1967, 159, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Du, R.; Tang, M.; Wang, B.; Zhang, J. Effect of Ni2+ on Lithium-Ion Diffusion in Layered LiNi1−x−yMnxCoyO2 Materials. Crystals 2021, 11, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Akimoto, J.; Gotoh, Y.; Oosawa, Y. Synthesis and Structure Refinement of LiCoO2Single Crystals. J. Solid State Chem. 1998, 141, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, C.; Ma, X.; Zhou, L.; Cheng, J.; Sun, J.; Zhou, Y. Study on the rapid synthesis of LiNi1−xCoxO2 cathode material for lithium secondary battery. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cauranta, D.; Baffie, N.; Garcia, B.; Pereira-Ramosb, J.P. Synthesis by a soft chemistry route and characterization of LiNixCo1−xO2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) cathode materials. Solid State Ionics. 1996, 91, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thompson, A.P.; Aktulga, H.M.; Berger, R.; Bolintineanu, D.S.; Brown, W.M.; Crozier, P.S.; Veld, P.J.; Kohlmeyer, A.; Moore, S.G.; Nguyen, T.D.; et al. LAMMPS—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022, 271, 108171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Morgan, L.M.; Islam, M.M.; Yang, H.; O’Regan, K.; Patel, A.N.; Ghosh, A.; Kendrick, E.; Marinescu, M.; Offer, G.J.; Morgan, B.J.; et al. From Atoms to Cells: Multiscale Modeling of LiNixMnyCozO2 Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Belharouak, I.; Sun, Y.-K.; Liu, J.; Amine, K. Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2 as a suitable cathode for high power applications. J. Power Sources 2003, 123, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bie, X.; Du, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Ehrenberg, H.; Nikolowski, K.; Wang, C.; Chen, G.; Wei, Y. Relationships between the crystal/interfacial properties and electrochemical performance of LiNi0.33Co0.33Mn0.33O2 in the voltage window of 2.5–4.6V. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 97, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ishidzu, K.; Oka, Y.; Nakamura, T. Lattice volume change during charge/discharge reaction and cycle performance of Li[NixCoyMnz]O2. Solid State Ion. 2016, 288, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sun, H.; Zhao, K. Electronic Structure and Comparative Properties of LiNixMnyCozO2 Cathode Materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 6002–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, H.-H.; Manthiram, A. Impact of Microcrack Generation and Surface Degradation on a Nickel-Rich Layered Li[Ni0.9Co0.05Mn0.05]O2 Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 8486–8493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dahbi, M.; Saadoune, I.; Amarilla, J.M. LixNi0.7Co0.3O2 electrode material: Structural, physical and electrochemical investigations. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 5266–5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kondrakov, A.O.; Schmidt, A.; Xu, J.; Geßwein, H.; Mönig, R.; Hartmann, P.; Sommer, H.; Brezesinski, T.; Janek, J. Anisotropic Lattice Strain and Mechanical Degradation of High- and Low-Nickel NCM Cathode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 3286–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Unit cell of the NMC111 containing 360 atoms and (b) the corresponding superstructure.
Figure 1. (a) Unit cell of the NMC111 containing 360 atoms and (b) the corresponding superstructure.
Crystals 15 00272 g001
Figure 2. Energy curves of the five NMC compositions during equilibration.
Figure 2. Energy curves of the five NMC compositions during equilibration.
Crystals 15 00272 g002
Figure 3. Stress–strain curves of different NMC compositions with stretching in the (a) x-direction, (b) y-direction, and (c) z-direction; and (d) calculated stiffness of the C11, C22, and C33 for NMC111, NMC532, NMC622, NMC721, and NMC811.
Figure 3. Stress–strain curves of different NMC compositions with stretching in the (a) x-direction, (b) y-direction, and (c) z-direction; and (d) calculated stiffness of the C11, C22, and C33 for NMC111, NMC532, NMC622, NMC721, and NMC811.
Crystals 15 00272 g003
Figure 4. Stress decomposition into the kinetic, electrostatic, and pairwise energy contribution.
Figure 4. Stress decomposition into the kinetic, electrostatic, and pairwise energy contribution.
Crystals 15 00272 g004
Figure 5. Decomposition of pairwise energy into individual atom contribution of the Li+, Ni2+, Ni3+, Mn4+, Co3+, and O2−.
Figure 5. Decomposition of pairwise energy into individual atom contribution of the Li+, Ni2+, Ni3+, Mn4+, Co3+, and O2−.
Crystals 15 00272 g005
Table 1. Morse potential function parameters [55].
Table 1. Morse potential function parameters [55].
Interaction PairD0 (eV)r0 (Å)α (Å−1)
Li+ − O2−0.0011142.6813603.429506
Ni2+ − O2−0.0293562.5007542.679137
Ni3+ − O2−0.0293562.5007542.679137
Mn4+ − O2−0.0296582.4400003.012000
Co3+ − O2−0.0109582.4006283.461272
O2− − O2−0.0423953.3587011.659316
Table 2. Composition ratios of the LiNi1−x−yMnxCoyO2 samples.
Table 2. Composition ratios of the LiNi1−x−yMnxCoyO2 samples.
NMCNi2+Ni3+Mn4+Co3+
1110.3300.330.33
5320.30.20.30.2
6220.20.40.20.2
7210.20.50.20.1
8110.10.70.10.1
Table 3. Change in stiffness of the NMC111 with different charges.
Table 3. Change in stiffness of the NMC111 with different charges.
NMCCharge
Weight
C11 (GPa)
Simulation ResultReference Result [Ref.]
11150%142.0199 [50]
60%195.7
80%326.5
100%490.4
Table 4. Partial charges used for Coulombic interactions.
Table 4. Partial charges used for Coulombic interactions.
IonsPartial Charges (qi)
Li++0.6
Ni2++1.2
Ni3++1.8
Mn4++2.4
Co3++1.8
O2−−1.2
Table 5. Comparison of lattice constants between the simulation results and reference.
Table 5. Comparison of lattice constants between the simulation results and reference.
NMCSimulation Result (Å)Reference Result (Å)
x-Axisz-Axisx-Axis[Ref.]z-Axis
1112.95514.7032.862[61]14.238
2.865[62]14.249
2.865[63]14.25
2.868[47]14.213
2.8125[64]14.42
5322.95114.6852.925[64]14.42
6222.93614.6102.8683[65]14.2241
2.91[64]14.39
7212.94214.6382.8565[66]14.1576
8112.93214.5902.83[67]14.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haq, I.U.; Lee, S. Molecular Dynamics Study of the Ni Content-Dependent Mechanical Properties of NMC Cathode Materials. Crystals 2025, 15, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15030272

AMA Style

Haq IU, Lee S. Molecular Dynamics Study of the Ni Content-Dependent Mechanical Properties of NMC Cathode Materials. Crystals. 2025; 15(3):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15030272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haq, Ijaz Ul, and Seungjun Lee. 2025. "Molecular Dynamics Study of the Ni Content-Dependent Mechanical Properties of NMC Cathode Materials" Crystals 15, no. 3: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15030272

APA Style

Haq, I. U., & Lee, S. (2025). Molecular Dynamics Study of the Ni Content-Dependent Mechanical Properties of NMC Cathode Materials. Crystals, 15(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15030272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop