Next Article in Journal
Improving the Quality of Spontaneously Growing HviGH11 Crystals by Increasing the Viscosity Using Polyethylene Glycols
Previous Article in Journal
Revisiting the Crystallography of {225}γ Martensite: How EBSD Can Help to Solve Long-Standing Controversy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Single Crystal Growth and X-ray Diffraction Characterization of a Quasi-Spin Chain Compound, Li2CuO2

Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2024, 14(3), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14030288
Submission received: 4 March 2024 / Revised: 11 March 2024 / Accepted: 15 March 2024 / Published: 21 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
We report the growth of single crystals and X-ray diffraction characterization of the quasi-one-dimensional spin chain compound, Li2CuO2. The single crystals were grown using the high-temperature solution growth technique. The resulting blade-shaped crystals exhibit a shiny black color, with dimensions reaching several millimeters along the crystallographic b -axis. The as-grown crystals were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction and Laue back reflection. The I-centered orthorhombic, Immm , structure was confirmed. Crystal structure parameters were determined to be a = 3.6744 Å, b = 2.8600 Å, and c = 9.4257 Å from Rietveld analysis. Our work helps to remove obstacles to the synthesis and study of a model cuprate system, Li2CuO2, facilitating the use of experimental probes that require sizable crystals.

1. Introduction

Intense research focus in low-dimensional materials centers around one-dimensional (1D) spin chains (e.g., Sr2CuO3, CuGeO3, SrCuO2) and spin ladders (e.g., Sr14Cu24O41, SrCu2O3) [1,2,3], owing to a myriad of unusual low-temperature properties governed by quantum effects. Refs. [2,3,4] These properties include various types of magnetic ground states for half-integer [5,6,7] and integer spin systems (e.g., the Haldane chain) [8,9], as well as the separation of spin (spinon) and charge (holon) degrees of freedom in Sr2CuO3 [10,11,12,13], spin-Peierls transitions in CeCuGe3 [14], etc. These phenomena are entirely governed by quantum-mechanical behavior and lack three-dimensional analogs. As observed, compounds containing, S = 1 / 2 , Cu2+, ions offer an excellent experimental platform for realizing such networks [1,2,3,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14] because of the enhanced quantum fluctuations resulting from Cu2+ ions and reduced dimensionality.
Recently, there has been considerable interest in the quasi 1D compound, Li2CuO2. Refs. [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] Li2CuO2 crystallizes into an orthorhombic structure ( Immm , space group # 71 ) with a = 3.6544 Å, b = 2.8602 Å, and c = 9.3774 Å at ambient pressure. Refs. [23,24] As depicted in Figure 1a, the most notable characteristic of Li2CuO2 is the formation of quasi-one-dimensional linear chains composed of CuO2 along the b -axis, separated by Li-O groups along the c -axis. Refs. [24,25] Due to the simple CuO4 square planar coordination along the b -axis (see Figure 1b), these spin chains run parallel to each other with a Cu-O-Cu bond angle of approximately 94°. Refs. [24,26] The copper atoms within these structural chains exhibit ferromagnetic (FM) coupling, resulting in ferromagnetic alignment along the b -axis, which are antiferromagnetically (AFM) coupled between the neighboring chains in the c -axis. Refs. [17,24,26] The remarkable interplay between one and three-dimensional magnetic interactions distinguishes Li2CuO2 from other related compounds, as evidenced by, for instance, the presence of long-range AFM order observed below T N ≈ 9 K with a Curie-Weiss temperature, Θ c w = −42 K, ref. [24] a field-induced weak ferromagnetic component below T 2 > 2.6 K, refs. [27,28] and relatively large magnetic moments of O2− ions in Li2CuO2 of about 0.2 μ B (largest for any low-dimensional cuprate system), and Zhang-Rice type excitations. Refs. [29,30] Despite the tremendous theoretical [15,19,20,27] and experimental studies, refs. [15,17,24,26,27] the precise nature of the magnetic interactions in this charge transfer insulator [31,32,33] has remained a topic of contentious debate.
It is noteworthy that most studies have focused on polycrystalline, Li2CuO2. Refs. [23,24,27,34,35] Bulk characterizations were done on single crystals grown by the floating-zone (FZ) technique. Refs. [16,18,26,28,30,33,36] These single crystals were grown under partial oxygen pressure and exhibited some oxygen vacancies. This oxygen partial pressure can strongly influence the Lithium self-diffusion, leading to the formation of Li2CuO2−δ, where δ = 0 0.3 , within their structure. Refs. [16,18] Consequently, the magnetic susceptibility, χ ( T ) , data at low temperatures for these single crystals of Li2CuO2 exhibit a slightly more pronounced Curie-like increase, which varies between samples, suggesting possible sample contamination related to surface sensitivity to moisture. Refs. [16,17,18] This variation may stem from differences in the thickness of inclusions of the second phase or micro-cracks at cleaved planes. Ref. [18] Given that advanced FZ techniques are not widely available in most scientific laboratories, we were inspired to investigate the synthesis of Li2CuO2 using the more accessible high-temperature solution growth technique, also known as the flux method.
Here, we present a successful single crystal growth of Li2CuO2. We utilized a conventional flux method and synthesized blade-shaped single crystals which are shiny black in color and air-sensitive [18], with dimensions reaching up to several millimeters along the crystallographic b -axis. We demonstrate the high quality of our single crystals through X-ray diffraction characterization. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first instance of Li2CuO2 crystal growth via flux growth.

2. Materials and Methods

Single crystals of Li2CuO2 were grown using Li2CO3 flux. The precisely weighed starting materials, Li2CO3 (99.999%, Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA), and CuO (99.995%, Alfa Aesar), were homogeneously mixed in a 4:1 ratio. This mixture was carefully transferred into an alumina crucible, covered with a lid, and gradually heated to 900 °C over 5 h, and held at 900 °C for 72 h (3 days) in air. Finally, the furnace was slowly cooled to room temperature for over 30 h. We obtained blade-shaped shiny single crystals (shown in Figure 2) with typical dimensions of 3 × 0.3 × 0.1 mm3.
We studied the crystal structure and the purity of the single crystal Li2CuO2 using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). The PXRD patterns were measured on pulverized Li2CuO2 single crystals at room temperature using a Proto AXRD Benchtop powder diffractometer. We utilized Cu-Kα X-ray radiation, and the structure was quantitatively analyzed by the Rietveld method using the GSAS program package [37].
We identified the crystallinity and crystallographic orientations of our single crystals using a Proto Laue-COS system, utilizing the Laue back reflection method. We used the Cu X-ray tube for X-ray generation with 40 kV and 30 mA. Due to the small width of the blade, we used a 0.8 mm pinhole aperture. We mount the single crystal with one of the flat surfaces perpendicular to the incident X-rays and the long blade direction vertically. Approximately 16 scans were performed over an extended duration (8 min) and averaged for clear diffraction patterns. The Laue patterns were analyzed by the Cologne Laue Indexation Program (CLIP) [38].

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Single Crystal Growth

Figure 2a displays optical images of as-grown single crystals in the flux matrix as well as two separate batches of pulverized Li2CuO2 single crystals on a millimeter-sized grid (see Figure 2b,c). This demonstrates that our synthesis conditions are highly reproducible. In the flux matrix, we obtained black, shiny blade-shaped single crystals with dimensions typically ranging from 2–3 mm in length, 0.3 mm in width, and 0.1 mm in thickness, with the longest dimension aligned along the crystallographic b -axis (see Laue X-ray diffraction below).

3.2. Structural Characterizations

To determine the crystal structure of the as-grown Li2CuO2 single crystals, we conducted single crystal diffraction and PXRD measurements in the Bragg-Brentano geometry at room temperature. Figure 3a displays the single crystal diffraction pattern. We observed peaks corresponding to the (1, 0, 1) and (2, 0, 2) planes at approximately 2 θ values of 25.96° and 53.48°, respectively. Earlier studies done on the single crystalline samples (using FZ technique) by Chung et al. [22] showed the resulting crystalline boules were faceted and exhibited a tendency to cleave along (1, 0, 1) planes similar to our single crystals [33]. It is consistent with an orthorhombic structure within the Immm group in Ref. [24] and our analysis below.
The PXRD pattern of the pulverized Li2CuO2 single crystals from the crystal batch in Figure 2c are displayed in Figure 3b. We performed detailed structural refinement using the structure model described in ref. [24]. The solid (red) curves overlaid on the data represent the Rietveld refinement in Figure 3b. We found that the PXRD pattern predominantly consists of the correct Li2CuO2 phase. We determined the lattice parameters of Li2CuO2 to be a = 3.67442 Å, b = 2.86001 Å, c = 9.42566 Å with α = β = γ = 90°, and we obtained the goodness-of-fit parameters χ 2 = 3.785 and Rwp = 0.584. Our Rietveld result is consistent with the orthorhombic Immm . The atomic coordinates and other parameters considered for the measurements, as well as detailed refined parameters for Li2CuO2, are presented in Table 1. These values agree well with previously reported values [24,34] as shown in Table 2. We found a small amount of impurity (less than 4%) in the PXRD pattern. It is determined to be the flux component Li2CO3 (ICSD: 66941), appearing at 2 θ = 21.1976° and 31.5°, indicated by * (dark grey) in Figure 3b.

3.3. Laue X-ray Diffraction

We examined the crystallinity of our crystal selected from the batch shown in Figure 2b, using the Laue back reflection method across the as-grown crystal facet. The resulting Laue image from a Li2CuO2 single crystal is shown in Figure 4a and simulated Laue patterns together with the data are presented in Figure 4b. Our Laue pattern shows no visible impurity phases or misaligned crystals, indicating a high quality of the single crystal. We find that the surface perpendicular to the incident X-rays is (1, 0, 1) plane, and the horizontal direction is the high symmetry direction to (1, 0, 0). We also find that the vertical direction is to [0, 1, 0], which is along the long blade direction. Considering the proposed quasi-one-dimensional chains in this compound, it is natural that the crystal extends along the chain direction (the crystallographic b-axis).

4. Conclusions

We present a comprehensive report on the single crystal growth using the flux method and the structural characterization of Li2CuO2 single crystals. Through a detailed structural refinement of the PXRD diffraction data, we determine that the material crystallizes in a Immm ( # 71 ) space group, with orthorhombic symmetry, and assess the lattice parameters of Li2CuO2. Our observations indicate that the as-grown samples of Li2CuO2 measure several millimeters along the crystallographic b -axis. Further, Laue back reflection X-ray measurements indicate the high quality of the single crystal. Our work helps to remove obstacles to the synthesis and study of a model cuprate system, Li2CuO2, facilitating the use of experimental probes that require sizable crystals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; methodology, A.B. and M.G.K.; validation, A.B. and M.G.K.; formal analysis, A.B.; investigation, A.B. and M.G.K.; resources, M.G.K.; data curation, A.B. and M.G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and M.G.K.; writing—review and editing, A.B. and M.G.K.; visualization, A.B.; supervision, M.G.K.; project administration, M.G.K.; funding acquisition, M.G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schulz, H. Correlated Fermions and Transport in Mesoscopic Systems; Martin, T., Montambaux, G., Tran Thanh Van, J., Eds.; Editions Frontières: Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Giamarchi, T. Quantum Physics in One Dimension; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rice, T.M. The rich variety of cuprates. Phys. B Condens. Matter 1997, 241–243, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vasiliev, A.; Volkova, O.; Zvereva, E.; Markina, M. Milestones of low-D quantum magnetism. NPJ Quantum Mater. 2018, 3, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dagotto, E. Experiments on ladders reveal a complex interplay between a spin-gapped normal state and superconductivity. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1999, 62, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Johnston, D.C.; Kremer, R.K.; Troyer, M.; Wang, X.; Klümper, A.; Bud’ko, S.L.; Panchula, A.F.; Canfield, P.C. Thermodynamics of spin S = 1/2 antiferromagnetic uniform and alternating-exchange Heisenberg chains. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 9558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cowley, R.A. Dynamical Properties of Unconventional Magnetic Systems; NATO ASI Series; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; Volume 349. [Google Scholar]
  8. Haldane, F.D.M. Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin Heisenberg Antiferromagnets: Semiclassically Quantized Solitons of the One-Dimensional Easy-Axis Néel State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 50, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Honda, Z.; Asakawa, H.; Katsumata, K. Magnetic Field versus Temperature Phase Diagram of a Quasi-One-Dimensional S = 1 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schlappa, J.; Wohlfeld, K.; Zhou, K.J.; Mourigal, M.; Haverkort, M.W.; Strocov, V.N.; Hozoi, L.; Monney, C.; Nishimoto, S.; Singh, S.; et al. Spin–orbital separation in the quasi-one-dimensional Mott insulator Sr2CuO3. Nature 2012, 485, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Johnston, S.; Monney, C.; Bisogni, V.; Zhou, K.-J.; Kraus, R.; Behr, G.; Strocov, V.N.; Malek, J.; Drechsler, S.-L.; Geck, J.; et al. Electron-lattice interactions strongly renormalize the charge-transfer energy in the spin-chain cuprate Li2CuO2. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fujisawa, H.; Yokoya, T.; Takahashi, T.; Miyasaka, S.; Kibune, M.; Takagi, H. Angle-resolved photoemission study of Sr2CuO3. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 59, 7358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, C.; Matsuura, A.Y.; Shen, Z.-X.; Motoyama, N.; Eisaki, H.; Uchida, S.; Tohyama, T.; Maekawa, S. Observation of Spin-Charge Separation in One-Dimensional SrCuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hase, M.; Terasaki, I.; Uchinokura, K. Observation of the spin-Peierls transition in linear Cu2+ (spin-1/2) chains in an inorganic compound CuGeO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zoghlin, E.; Stone, M.B.; Wilson, S.D. Refined spin-wave model and multimagnon bound states in Li2CuO2. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 064408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shu, G.J.; Tian, J.C.; Lin, C.K.; Hayashi, M.; Liou, S.C.; Chen, W.T.; Wong, D.P.; Liou, H.L.; Chou, F.C. Corrigendum: Oxygen vacancy-induced magnetic moment in edge-sharing CuO2 chains of Li2CuO2−δ. New J. Phys. 2018, 20, 059501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kuzian, R.O.; Klingeler, R.; Lorenz, W.E.A.; Wizent, N.; Nishimoto, S.; Nitzsche, U.; Rosner, H.; Milosavljevic, D.; Hozoi, L.; Yadav, R.; et al. Comment on ’Oxygen vacancy-induced magnetic moment in edge-sharing CuO2 chains of Li2CuO2. New J. Phys. 2018, 20, 058001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wizent, N.; Behr, G.; Loser, W.; Buchner, B.; Klingeler, R. Challenges in the crystal growth of Li2CuO2 and LiMnPO4. J. Cryst. Growth 2011, 318, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nishimoto, S.; Drechsler, S.-L.; Kuzian, R.; Richter, J.; van den Brink, J. Interplay of interchain interactions and exchange anisotropy: Stability and fragility of multipolar states in spin-1/2 quasi-one-dimensional frustrated helimagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 214415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nishimoto, S.; Drechsler, S.-L.; Kuzian, R.O.; van den Brink, J.; Richter, J.; Lorenz, W.E.A.; Skourski, Y.; Klingeler, R.; Büchner, B. Saturation Field of Frustrated Chain Cuprates: Broad Regions of Predominant Interchain Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 097201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kordatos, A.; Kuganathan, N.; Kelaidis, N.; Iyngaran, P.; Chroneos, A. Defects and lithium migration in Li2CuO2. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chung, E.M.L.; McIntyre, G.J.; Paul, D.M.; Balakrishnan, G.; Lees, M.R. Oxygen moment formation and canting in Li2CuO2. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 144410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hoppe, R.; Rieck, H. Die Kristallstruktur von Li2CuO2. Z. Fur Anorg. Und Allg. Chem. Band 1970, 379, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sapiña, F.; Rodríguez-Carvajal, J.; Sanchis, M.J.; Ibáñez, R.; Beltrán, A.; Beltrán, D. Crystal and magnetic structure of Li2CuO2. Solid State Commun. 1990, 74, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sreedhar, K.; Ganguly, P. Magnetic susceptibility studies on ternary oxides of copper(II). Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boehm, M.; Coad, S.; Roessli, B.; Zheludev, A.; Zolliker, M.; Böni, P.; Paul, D.M.; Eisaki, H.; Motoyama, N.; Uchida, S. Competing exchange interactions in Li2CuO2. Europhys. Lett. 1998, 43, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ortega, R.J.; Jensen, P.J.; Rao, K.V.; Sapiña, F.; Beltrañ, D.; Iqbal, Z.; Cooley, J.C.; Smith, J.L. A field induced ferromagnetic-like transition below 2.8 K in Li2CuO2 An experimental and theoretical study. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 83, 6542–6544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Staub, U.; Roessli, B.; Amato, A. Magnetic ordering in Li2CuO2 studied by μSR technique. Phys. B 2000, 299, 289–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Learmonth, T.; McGuinness, C.; Glans, P.-A.; Downes, J.E.; Schmitt, T.; Duda, L.-C.; Guo, J.-H.; Chou, F.C.; Smith, K.E. Observation of multiple Zhang-Rice excitations in a correlated solid: Resonant inelastic X-ray scattering study of Li2CuO2. Europhys. Lett. 2007, 79, 47012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Monney, C.; Bisogni, V.; Zhou, K.-J.; Kraus, R.; Strocov, V.N.; Behr, G.; Málek, J.; Kuzian, R.; Drechsler, S.-L.; Johnston, S.; et al. Determining the Short-Range Spin Correlations in the Spin-Chain Li2CuO2 and CuGeO3 Compounds Using Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 087403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mizuno, Y.; Tohyama, T.; Maekawa, S.; Osafune, T.; Motoyama, N.; Eisaki, H.; Uchida, S. Electronic states and magnetic properties of edge-sharing Cu-O chains. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 5326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Atzkern, S.; Knupfer, M.; Golden, M.S.; Fink, J.; Waidacher, C.; Richter, J.; Becker, K.W.; Motoyama, N.; Eisaki, H.; Uchida, S. Dynamics of a hole in a CuO4 plaquette: Electron energy-loss spectroscopy of Li2CuO2. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, Y.-J.; Hill, J.P.; Chou, F.C.; Casa, D.; Gog, T.; Venkataraman, C.T. Charge and orbital excitations in Li2CuO2. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 155105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ebisu, S.; Komatsu, T.; Wada, N.; Hashiguchi, T.; Kichambare, P.; Nagata, S. Extremely large short-range order in an antiferromagnet Li2CuO2. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1998, 59, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramos-Sanchez, G.; Romero-Ibarra, I.C.; Vazquez-Arenas, J.; Tapia, C.; Aguilar-Eseiza, N.; Gonzalez, I. Controlling Li2CuO2 single phase transition to preserve cathode capacity and cyclability in Li-ion batteries. Solid State Ionics 2017, 303, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kawamata, S.; Okuda, K.; Kindo, K. ESR study on Li2CuO2 single crystal. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 272–276 Pt 2, 939–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Toby, B.H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Cryst. 2001, 34, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cologne Laue Indexation Program. Available online: https://clip4.sourceforge.net/ (accessed on 17 February 2024).
Figure 1. (a) Schematics of a unit cell of Li2CuO2. The magnetic moments within the CuO2 planes along b -axis are FM ordered, whereas neighboring planes are coupled AFM along the c -axis. Red full circles are the oxygen atoms, green color circles are the Cu atoms and the blue circles are the Li atoms. Solid bicolor lines are the nearest neighbor Cu-O and Li-O bonds. (b) Schematics of a two unit cell of Li2CuO2 in the bc plane.
Figure 1. (a) Schematics of a unit cell of Li2CuO2. The magnetic moments within the CuO2 planes along b -axis are FM ordered, whereas neighboring planes are coupled AFM along the c -axis. Red full circles are the oxygen atoms, green color circles are the Cu atoms and the blue circles are the Li atoms. Solid bicolor lines are the nearest neighbor Cu-O and Li-O bonds. (b) Schematics of a two unit cell of Li2CuO2 in the bc plane.
Crystals 14 00288 g001
Figure 2. (a) As-grown single crystals of Li2CuO2 in the flux matrix. (b,c) Single crystals pulverized from the flux matrix of Li2CuO2 from two different batches on a millimeter-sized grid.
Figure 2. (a) As-grown single crystals of Li2CuO2 in the flux matrix. (b,c) Single crystals pulverized from the flux matrix of Li2CuO2 from two different batches on a millimeter-sized grid.
Crystals 14 00288 g002
Figure 3. (Color online) (a) Single crystal X-ray diffraction pattern of Li2CuO2. (b) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern (black) of pulverized single-crystals of Li2CuO2. The solid (red) curves overlaying the data represent the fit from Rietveld refinement. The blue and grey solid lines represent the reference peaks of Li2CuO2 and Li2CO3, respectively. The * symbols show the impurity peaks of a flux component, Li2CO3.
Figure 3. (Color online) (a) Single crystal X-ray diffraction pattern of Li2CuO2. (b) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern (black) of pulverized single-crystals of Li2CuO2. The solid (red) curves overlaying the data represent the fit from Rietveld refinement. The blue and grey solid lines represent the reference peaks of Li2CuO2 and Li2CO3, respectively. The * symbols show the impurity peaks of a flux component, Li2CO3.
Crystals 14 00288 g003
Figure 4. (a) Laue diffraction pattern for Li2CuO2 single crystal along the (100) direction. (b) Laue diffraction pattern with simulated diffraction pattern in green circles by using Cologne Laue Indexation Program (CLIP) software (version CLIP4 RC1). (100) and (101) directions are marked. The vertical direction is (010) direction.
Figure 4. (a) Laue diffraction pattern for Li2CuO2 single crystal along the (100) direction. (b) Laue diffraction pattern with simulated diffraction pattern in green circles by using Cologne Laue Indexation Program (CLIP) software (version CLIP4 RC1). (100) and (101) directions are marked. The vertical direction is (010) direction.
Crystals 14 00288 g004
Table 1. Structural parameters obtained by refining X-ray powder diffraction for Li2CuO2 at room temperature, shown in Figure 3b with a space group Immm ( # 71 ). The I-centered orthorhombic lattice constants are a = 3.6744 Å, b = 2.8600 Å, c = 9.4257 Å, and α = β = γ = 90°, with goodness of fit parameters, χ 2 = 3.785, and Rwp = 0.584.
Table 1. Structural parameters obtained by refining X-ray powder diffraction for Li2CuO2 at room temperature, shown in Figure 3b with a space group Immm ( # 71 ). The I-centered orthorhombic lattice constants are a = 3.6744 Å, b = 2.8600 Å, c = 9.4257 Å, and α = β = γ = 90°, with goodness of fit parameters, χ 2 = 3.785, and Rwp = 0.584.
AtomWyckxyz Occ . B (Å)
Li4j0.500.1848710.00032
Cu2b00.50.510.00032
O4i000.3618910.00032
Table 2. Comparison of the experimental and computed lattice constants, a , b , and c for Li2CuO2 in the current study and literature data.
Table 2. Comparison of the experimental and computed lattice constants, a , b , and c for Li2CuO2 in the current study and literature data.
a (Å)b (Å)c (Å)Cu-O-Cu (°)Cu-Cu (Å)Cu-O (Å)Reference
Experiment3.67442.86009.425795.372.86001.9338this work
Experiment3.66152.86279.392593.962.86281.9577Ref. [24]
Experiment3.652.869.38---Ref. [34]
Experiment3.66142.86489.396991 1.987Ref. [16]
Experiment: Li2CuO1.713.66092.86389.393495.55--Ref. [16]
DFT, GGA + PBE3.57792.86289.3926--1.9162Ref. [21]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balodhi, A.; Kim, M.G. Single Crystal Growth and X-ray Diffraction Characterization of a Quasi-Spin Chain Compound, Li2CuO2. Crystals 2024, 14, 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14030288

AMA Style

Balodhi A, Kim MG. Single Crystal Growth and X-ray Diffraction Characterization of a Quasi-Spin Chain Compound, Li2CuO2. Crystals. 2024; 14(3):288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14030288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balodhi, Ashiwini, and Min Gyu Kim. 2024. "Single Crystal Growth and X-ray Diffraction Characterization of a Quasi-Spin Chain Compound, Li2CuO2" Crystals 14, no. 3: 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14030288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop