Active Polypropylene Fibers for Controlling Shrinkage Cracks in Cement-Stabilized Materials
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Polypropylene Fibers Grafted with Maleic Anhydride
2.1. Grafting Reaction Mechanism
2.2. Ultraviolet-Grafted Maleic Anhydride
2.2.1. Grafting Product Preparation Method
- (1)
- The polypropylene fibers are first soaked in acetone for 24 h to remove surface impurities. After soaking, the acetone is drained, and the fibers are dried in an oven at 60 °C to yield defatted fibers.
- (2)
- A measured amount of the defatted fibers is placed into a quartz tube. A prepared xylene solution containing maleic anhydride and benzophenone is added to the tube in a controlled ratio, and the mixture is left to stand at room temperature for approximately 30 min to allow for uniform dispersion.
- (3)
- The quartz tube is then placed into the ultraviolet photochemical reaction instrument. The power is turned on to activate the UV lamp for a specified period, initiating the grafting reaction. Once the reaction is complete, the lamp is turned off, and the tube is allowed to rest for another 30 min.
- (4)
- After the reaction, the fibers are rinsed with acetone to remove any unreacted substances or by-products. Finally, the fibers are dried in an oven until a constant weight is achieved, indicating the completion of the grafting process and yielding the maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene fibers.
2.2.2. Determination of Grafting Yield
2.2.3. Fiber Ultraviolet-Grafted Maleic Anhydride Test
3. Active Polypropylene Fiber Preparation and Properties
3.1. Activation Principle of Polypropylene Fiber Grafts
3.2. Preparation of Active Polypropylene Fibers
3.2.1. Preparation Methods
- (1)
- Accurately weigh a specific amount of the fiber grafts and transfer them into a three-necked flask. Add an appropriate volume of anhydrous ethanol to the flask.
- (2)
- Introduce a predetermined quantity of diethylene triamine and carbodiimide into the flask. Stir the mixture to ensure complete dissolution; then, seal the flask securely.
- (3)
- Position the flask on a heating mantle and heat the mixture to 78 °C, allowing the anhydrous ethanol to reflux. Maintain this temperature for a specified reaction period to ensure proper amidation.
- (4)
- After the reaction time has elapsed, turn off the heating mantle and remove the flask. Filter the solution to separate the liquid phase; then, wash the resulting fibers twice with acetone, followed by multiple rinses with distilled water to eliminate any unreacted materials and by-products.
- (5)
- Dry the washed fibers thoroughly and weigh them to determine the mass of the amidation-modified fiber grafts.
3.2.2. Determination of Amidation Yield
- (1)
- Prior to the amidation reaction, accurately weigh a specific amount of fiber grafts using an analytical balance.
- (2)
- After the amidation reaction is complete, thoroughly clean and dry the fibers to remove any unreacted reagents and by-products.
- (3)
- Weigh the dried fibers to obtain the mass after the reaction.
- (4)
- Utilize an elemental analyzer to determine the percentage content of nitrogen in the modified fibers.
3.2.3. Analysis of Fiber Amidation Test Results
3.3. Performance of Active Polypropylene Fibers
3.3.1. FTIR Spectrum Analysis
3.3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Test
3.3.3. Analysis of Fiber Surface Friction Coefficient
3.3.4. Determination of Water Contact Angle on Fiber Surfaces
3.3.5. Tensile Properties Test
4. Mechanical Properties of Cement-Stabilized Macadam
4.1. Materials and Test Program
4.1.1. Materials
4.1.2. Testing Program
4.2. Distribution of Fibers in Cement-Stabilized Macadam
4.3. Test Results and Analysis
5. Shrinkage Performance of Cement-Stabilized Macadam
5.1. Test Method
5.1.1. Drying Shrinkage Test
5.1.2. Thermal Shrinkage Test
5.2. Test Result and Analysis
5.2.1. Dry Shrinkage
5.2.2. Temperature Shrinkage
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- Active polypropylene fibers were synthesized through UV grafting and surface functional group activation methods. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the success of these modifications, as evidenced by a strong carbonyl absorption peak at 1710 cm−1 and a broad peak in the range of 3200–3400 cm−1. These results indicate the effective grafting and activation reactions involving carboxyl groups on the polypropylene surface. SEM analysis further revealed the presence of aggregated deposits on the surface of the activated fibers, significantly increasing their specific surface area.
- (2)
- Water contact angle measurements demonstrated a substantial decrease in the contact angle of the activated polypropylene fibers from 106.3° to 39.9°. This indicates that the introduction of carboxyl groups significantly improved the wettability of the cement slurry on the fiber surface, thereby enhancing the bonding strength between the fibers and the cement matrix. Also, the tensile performance tests indicated that the grafting and activation reactions had a minimal impact on the tensile strength and elongation at break of the polypropylene fibers.
- (3)
- The compressive and tensile strengths of cement-stabilized macadam incorporating active polypropylene fibers were found to be superior to those with ordinary polypropylene fibers. After 28 days, the compressive strength increased by approximately 6.56%, while the tensile strength rose by about 4.94%. Concurrently, the rebound modulus exhibited a reduction of around 7.4%. These enhancements can be attributed primarily to the introduction of amide groups on the active polypropylene fibers, which increased the hydrophilicity of the fiber surface, improved wettability with the cement paste, and strengthened the chemical bonding between the fibers and the cement matrix.
- (4)
- The incorporation of active polypropylene fibers effectively mitigated both the drying shrinkage and temperature shrinkage coefficients of cement-stabilized macadam. Compared to ordinary polypropylene fibers, the drying shrinkage coefficient was reduced by 25.55%, while the temperature shrinkage coefficient decreased by 13.16%. These findings indicate that active poly-propylene fibers form a stronger bond with the stabilizing material, thereby enhancing the fibers’ toughening and shrinkage-resistant properties. These results confirmed the superiority of fiber surface activation treatment in enhancing the crack resistance of cement-stabilized macadam.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Bian, G. Analysis of the mechanism of reflective cracking in semi-rigid base asphalt pavements using LSPM. Highw. Traffic Sci. Technol. 2016, 33, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Wu, J.; Zhao, X.; Yan, P.; Ji, W. Effect of brick waste content on mechanical properties of mixed recycled concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 292, 123320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Xu, C. Experimental study on the performance of fiber-reinforced cement-stabilized aggregates with different aggregates. Highway 2022, 67, 237–241. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, X. Study on the performance of cement-stabilized macadam base with polyester fiber. Shandong Transp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 68–70+77. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Wang, D.; Wei, X.; Wang, L. Impact of fiber diameter on road performance of cement-stabilized macadam. Balt. J. Road Bridge Eng. 2017, 12, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.; Zhou, Z. Study on the road performance of rubber powder and fiber composite modified cement stabilized macadam. Highway 2024, 69, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shen, A. Study on shrinkage and crack resistance of glass fiber reinforced cement stabilized macadam. J. Zhengzhou Univ. (Eng. Ed.) 2023, 44, 114–120. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, C.; Liang, N.; Zhu, X.; Yuan, L.; Zhou, B. Fiber-reinforced cement-stabilized macadam with various polyvinyl alcohol fiber contents and lengths. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 04020312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Zhou, H.; Guo, C. Influence of basalt fiber on mechanical properties of permeable cement stabilized macadam base. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 651, 032004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Wu, W.; Chen, R.J. Experimental study on the deformation performance of cement-stabilized macadam reinforced with fiber. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 335, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Gu, Z.; Li, H. Toughening study of fiber cement-stabilized crushed pebble based on crack strain energy balance principle. China J. Highw. 2023, 36, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Liu, C.; Li, Q. Experimental study on the mechanical properties of polypropylene fiber cement stabilized macadam. J. Zhengzhou Univ. (Eng. Ed.) 2010, 31, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Li, X.; Lv, R. Effects of expansive agents and polypropylene fibers on mechanical properties of cement-stabilized macadam. Highway 2011, 56, 143–146. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, C.; Qi, S. Study on the mechanical properties of polyester and polypropylene fiber cement-stabilized macadam. Highway 2015, 60, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, N.; Xiang, Y.; Qin, M. Crack resistance and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced cement-stabilized macadam base. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 6564076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Wu, C. Effect of fiber on mechanical properties of cement-stabilized macadam mixture. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2044, 012045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadi Sahlabadi, S.; Bayat, M.; Mousivand, M.; Saadat, M. Freeze-thaw durability of cement-stabilized soil reinforced with polypropylene/basalt fibers. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2021, 33, 04021232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C. Hydrophilic Modification and Characterization of Polypropylene. Master’s Thesis, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Yang, J.; Jin, Z. Influence of nano-SiO2 modified glass fiber surface on the interfacial performance of glass fiber/polypropylene composites. J. Beijing Univ. Chem. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2016, 43, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.; Song, M.; Gou, H. Mechanical properties of silica fume-modified polypropylene fiber self-compacting concrete. China Sci. 2020, 15, 1401–1404. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D.; Zhao, B.; Chen, K.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Pan, K. Research progress on the preparation and application of hollow polypropylene fibers. China Plast. 2023, 37, 109. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T 21120-2018; Synthetic Fibers Are Used for Cement Concrete and Mortar. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2018.
- JTG 3441-2024; Test Methods of Materials Stabilized with Inorganic Binders for Highway Engineering. Ministry of Transport: Beijing, China, 2024.
No. | MAC (mol/L) | BMF (%) | UIT (h) | GY (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.25 | 1.34 |
2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.25 | 1.77 |
3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.25 | 1.90 |
4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 2.25 | 1.97 |
5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.00 | 1.72 |
6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 2.00 | 1.88 |
7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.50 | 1.64 |
8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 2.50 | 2.04 |
9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.00 | 1.84 |
10 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.00 | 1.91 |
11 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.50 | 1.79 |
12 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.50 | 2.11 |
13 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.25 | 2.14 |
14 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.25 | 2.13 |
No. | DC (mol/L) | CDF (%) | RT (h) | AY (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 6.75 | 0.19 |
2 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 6.75 | 0.28 |
3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 6.75 | 0.25 |
4 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 6.75 | 0.36 |
5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 0.27 |
6 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 0.36 |
7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 7.0 | 0.32 |
8 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 7.0 | 0.40 |
9 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 6.5 | 0.35 |
10 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0.38 |
11 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 7.0 | 0.33 |
12 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 0.39 |
13 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 6.75 | 0.48 |
14 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 6.75 | 0.49 |
Types | Polypropylene Fiber | Fiber Graft | Active Polypropylene Fiber |
---|---|---|---|
Surface Friction Coefficient | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.43 |
Sample | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elongation at Break (%) |
---|---|---|
Polypropylene Fiber | 217 | 165 |
Fiber Graft | 208 | 157 |
Active Polypropylene Fiber | 210 | 159 |
Material Specification | Passing Rate (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19.0 | 9.5 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 0.075 | |
10–30 mm | 90.23 | 31.71 | 4.83 | 0.99 | |||
10–20 mm | 100 | 95.21 | 19.04 | 2.29 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.15 |
5–10 mm | 100 | 97.78 | 28.46 | 4.25 | 1.28 | 0.31 | |
chip | 100 | 99.48 | 88.01 | 42.18 | 14.31 | ||
synthetic grade | 98.05 | 85.14 | 60.06 | 33.99 | 23.44 | 11.06 | 3.71 |
Mix ID | Cement Content (%) | Fiber Type | Fiber Volume Content (‰) |
---|---|---|---|
GP00-5 | 5 | No fiber | - |
PP08-5 | 5 | Ordinary polypropylene fiber | 0.8 |
GP06-5 | 5 | Active polypropylene fiber | 0.6 |
GP08-5 | 5 | Active polypropylene fiber | 0.8 |
GP10-5 | 5 | Active polypropylene fiber | 1.0 |
GP06-4 | 4 | Active polypropylene fiber | 0.6 |
GP06-6 | 6 | Active polypropylene fiber | 0.6 |
GP06-7 | 7 | Active polypropylene fiber | 0.6 |
No. | Specimens | Age T (d) | Compressive Strength RC (MPa) | Tensile Strength Rf (MPa) | Flexural Tensile Strength RC (MPa) | Rebound Modulus E (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GP00-5 | 7 | 5.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 | 1948 |
2 | GP00-5 | 14 | 6.78 | 0.50 | 1.19 | 2233 |
3 | GP00-5 | 28 | 7.69 | 0.79 | 1.31 | 3213 |
4 | GP00-5 | 60 | 10.65 | 0.92 | 1.78 | 4486 |
5 | PP08-5 | 7 | 5.05 | 0.26 | 1.02 | 1810 |
6 | PP08-5 | 14 | 6.69 | 0.49 | 1.21 | 2097 |
7 | PP08-5 | 28 | 7.93 | 0.81 | 1.34 | 2818 |
8 | PP08-5 | 60 | 10.87 | 0.96 | 1.83 | 4198 |
9 | GP08-5 | 7 | 5.13 | 0.28 | 1.05 | 1670 |
10 | GP08-5 | 14 | 7.92 | 0.66 | 1.27 | 1855 |
11 | GP08-5 | 28 | 8.45 | 0.85 | 1.40 | 2756 |
12 | GP08-5 | 60 | 11.11 | 1.03 | 1.93 | 3850 |
13 | GP06-5 | 28 | 8.26 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 2929 |
14 | GP10-5 | 28 | 8.83 | 0.87 | 1.45 | 2609 |
15 | GP06-4 | 28 | 5.47 | 0.59 | 0.98 | 2244 |
16 | GP06-6 | 28 | 10.83 | 1.04 | 1.62 | 3967 |
17 | GP06-7 | 28 | 14.19 | 1.30 | 2.10 | 4305 |
No. | Specimens | Age T (d) | Maximum Water Loss △ω (%) | Maximum Dry Shrinkage Strain εd (με) | Average Dry Shrinkage Coefficient αd (με/%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GP00-5 | 3 | 3.97 | 353 | 88.9 |
2 | GP00-5 | 7 | 4.08 | 235 | 57.6 |
3 | GP00-5 | 14 | 4.18 | 220 | 52.6 |
4 | GP00-5 | 28 | 4.30 | 212 | 49.3 |
5 | PP08-5 | 3 | 4.17 | 318 | 76.3 |
6 | PP08-5 | 7 | 4.20 | 239 | 56.9 |
7 | PP08-5 | 14 | 4.29 | 207 | 48.3 |
8 | PP08-5 | 28 | 4.35 | 179 | 41.1 |
9 | GP08-5 | 3 | 4.09 | 276 | 67.5 |
10 | GP08-5 | 7 | 4.14 | 181 | 43.7 |
11 | GP08-5 | 14 | 4.31 | 160 | 37.1 |
12 | GP08-5 | 28 | 4.32 | 132 | 30.6 |
13 | GP06-5 | 7 | 4.18 | 210 | 50.3 |
14 | GP06-5 | 28 | 4.42 | 151 | 34.2 |
15 | GP10-5 | 7 | 4.05 | 138 | 34.1 |
16 | GP10-5 | 28 | 4.23 | 121 | 28.6 |
17 | GP08-4 | 7 | 4.03 | 145 | 36.0 |
18 | GP08-4 | 28 | 4.24 | 129 | 30.4 |
19 | GP08-6 | 7 | 4.15 | 248 | 59.8 |
20 | GP08-6 | 28 | 4.32 | 224 | 51.9 |
21 | GP08-7 | 7 | 4.27 | 320 | 74.9 |
22 | GP08-7 | 28 | 4.62 | 307 | 66.5 |
No. | Specimens | Age T (d) | Maximum Temperature Shrinkage Strain εt (με) (40 °C~−20 °C) | Average Temperature Shrinkage Coefficient αt (με/°C) (40 °C~−20 °C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GP00-5 | 7 | 408 | 6.8 |
2 | GP00-5 | 14 | 435 | 7.25 |
3 | GP00-5 | 28 | 480 | 8.00 |
4 | GP00-5 | 60 | 492 | 8.20 |
5 | PP08-5 | 7 | 392 | 6.53 |
6 | PP08-5 | 14 | 417 | 6.95 |
7 | PP08-5 | 28 | 465 | 7.75 |
8 | PP08-5 | 60 | 476 | 7.93 |
9 | GP08-5 | 7 | 353 | 5.88 |
10 | GP08-5 | 14 | 377 | 6.29 |
11 | GP08-5 | 28 | 404 | 6.73 |
12 | GP08-5 | 60 | 441 | 7.35 |
13 | GP06-5 | 14 | 385 | 6.42 |
14 | GP06-5 | 28 | 433 | 7.22 |
15 | GP10-5 | 14 | 326 | 5.43 |
16 | GP10-5 | 28 | 378 | 6.30 |
17 | GP08-4 | 14 | 352 | 5.87 |
18 | GP08-4 | 28 | 397 | 6.62 |
19 | GP08-6 | 14 | 421 | 7.02 |
20 | GP08-6 | 28 | 470 | 7.83 |
21 | GP08-7 | 14 | 439 | 7.32 |
22 | GP08-7 | 28 | 485 | 8.08 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cao, H.; Li, J.; Chen, T.; Ren, H.; Qiao, Z. Active Polypropylene Fibers for Controlling Shrinkage Cracks in Cement-Stabilized Materials. Crystals 2024, 14, 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14121033
Cao H, Li J, Chen T, Ren H, Qiao Z. Active Polypropylene Fibers for Controlling Shrinkage Cracks in Cement-Stabilized Materials. Crystals. 2024; 14(12):1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14121033
Chicago/Turabian StyleCao, Haibo, Jing Li, Tuanjie Chen, Haisheng Ren, and Zhu Qiao. 2024. "Active Polypropylene Fibers for Controlling Shrinkage Cracks in Cement-Stabilized Materials" Crystals 14, no. 12: 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14121033
APA StyleCao, H., Li, J., Chen, T., Ren, H., & Qiao, Z. (2024). Active Polypropylene Fibers for Controlling Shrinkage Cracks in Cement-Stabilized Materials. Crystals, 14(12), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14121033