Application of Carrier Materials in Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Basic Principles of Microbial Self-Healing Technology
3. Microbial Immobilization Methods and the Influencing Factors
3.1. Microbial Immobilization Methods
- Adsorption, a simple and reversible process, is a commonly used physical method to immobilize microbial cells through interactive forces, including van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, and ionic bonding between microorganisms and the carrier surface [25,26,27]. Microorganisms can easily escape into the surrounding environment due to poor bonding between weak bonds. To improve the carrier’s adsorption efficiency, the carrier is generally wrapped with non-water-soluble substances, or adsorbents, which are used to enhance the adsorption effect when the microorganisms are immobilized.
- Unlike adsorption, the covalent binding method requires the use of a binding agent. The groups on the microbial cell membrane (amino, carboxyl, imidazole, etc.) and the functional groups on the surface of the carrier (amide, ether, etc.) are firmly connected by covalent bonds with the action of the binding agent, which is an irreversible immobilization treatment method [28,29,30,31]. Binding agents are usually biologically harmful and can adversely affect a cell’s activity. Therefore, this method is rarely used for the immobilization of whole cells, mainly for the immobilization of enzymes [27].
- Encapsulation is also an irreversible method of immobilization. Microorganisms are encapsulated in a restrictive semi-permeable membrane and can only move within the membrane, and the semi-permeable membrane allows nutrients to flow into the membrane, protecting the microorganisms from the internal environment of the cement-based material and maintaining a high level of microbial activity [25,30,32]. The need to accurately control the pore size of the membrane is the key to this technology. When the membrane pore size is oversized, it can cause microbial leakage, and the opposite can affect nutrient flow.
- Flocculation is divided into natural flocculation and artificial flocculation. Natural flocculation is a method of using certain microorganisms that have the property of self-flocculating, which are combined to form an aggregation. Artificial flocculation refers to the method that reacts to the groups on microbial cell surfaces with cross-linking agents, causing the cells to associate with each other and form a meshwork structure [29,33,34]. Flocculation can increase microorganism concentrations and facilitate the coordination of microbial metabolism. However, natural flocculation consumes time and is easily affected by the external environment. Due to the intense chemical reaction in the cross-linking process, artificial flocculation can cause damage to microorganisms [35,36]. Therefore, flocculation requires improvement.
3.2. Factors Influencing Microbial Immobilization
4. Types and Applications of Carrier Materials
4.1. Aggregates
4.2. Low-Alkali Cementitious Materials
4.3. Organic Materials
4.3.1. Fiber
4.3.2. Rubber
4.3.3. PU Foam
4.3.4. Hydrogel
4.4. Microcapsules
4.5. Other Types of Carriers
5. Pros and Cons of Carrier Materials
- The immobilization process of microorganisms can be operated in batches, which makes the immobilization technology appropriate for continuous and automated industrial production. It is suitable for use in large-volume, high-consumption construction materials such as cement-based materials.
- Avoid microbial damage due to extrusion when cement-based materials are mixed.
- Improve the problem of lower microbial concentration caused by dilution of mixing water.
- Enhance the resistance of microorganisms to the high pressure and high alkaline environment inside the cementitious material and keep the microorganism activity effective for a long time.
- Increase the density of organisms, enhance the genetic stability of microorganisms and the synergy between populations [25].
5.1. Aggregates
5.2. Low-Alkali Cementitious Materials
5.3. Organic Materials
5.4. Microcapsules
5.5. Other Types of Carriers
6. Conclusions and Prospect
- Cement-based materials in service: the carrier material must maintain good compatibility with microorganisms to ensure the long-term effective activity of microorganisms and be able to respond quickly to various small cracks and defects while avoiding interference from other external factors to control the release of microbial self-healing agents. Simultaneously, the durability of the carrier material in use and its long-term effect on the matrix and external environment also require consideration. Therefore, how to improve the preparation process of carrier materials and enhance their sustainability and stability should continue to receive attention and development.
- In the above studies, solid waste resources (e.g., RA), waste tires, and plant fibers (e.g., coconut coir and flax fibers) have demonstrated excellent immobilization effects. In the future, the rational use of solid waste resources and renewable natural materials and the strengthening of research on environmentally friendly carrier materials will remain significant development trends.
- Presently, most studies on carrier materials mainly focus on a single type of material. Single carrier materials are highly targeted but have poor comprehensive performance. By synergizing composite carrier materials, such as inorganic–organic combinations, inorganic materials with porous structures and organic materials with more functional groups (e.g., amide, ether, etc.) combined, makes carrier materials with higher loading and stronger immobilization effects and may be beneficial to the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. In the future, single carrier materials are modified so that each type of carrier material can complement the other to obtain newer functions and finally new composite carrier materials with better performance to address the problems of poor mass transfer performance, low mechanical strength, and unstable bonding strength of single carrier materials.
- With the development of tissue engineering and molecular biology, carrier materials can be endowed with targeting functions through surface modification in the future. When the cement-based material is cracked, the carrier with targeting ability is stimulated by external moisture and oxygen and enriched at the crack through connecting pores, which makes the microorganism form a relatively high concentration in the crack area, thus effectively improving the crack repair effect.
- The parameter values, such as loadings, distribution area, working conditions, and morphological changes of the carrier, which are not easily observable, indirectly affect the crack healing effect. Linking such problems with computer simulation techniques through numerical simulations, combined with finite element or finite volume concepts, is imperative to assess and predict crack self-healing effects.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yuan, X.Z.; Sun, W.; Chen, H.S. Research and Progress of Microbiologically-enhanced Crack Remediation for Cementious Materials. J. Chin. Silic. Soc. 2009, 37, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonkers, H.M.; Thijssena, A.; Muyzerb, G.; Copuroglua, O.; Schlangena, E. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farmani, F.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Ramezanianpour, A.A. pH reduction through amendment of cement mortar with silica fume enhances its biological treatment using bacterial carbonate precipitation. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 3205–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chahal, N.; Siddique, R. Permeation properties of concrete made with fly ash and silica fume: Influence of ureolytic bacteria. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 49, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gueneyisi, E.; Gesoglu, M.; Karaoglu, S.; Mermerdas, K. Strength, permeability and shrinkage cracking of silica fume and metakaolin concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huynh, N.N.T.; Phuong, N.M.; Toan, N.P.A.; Son, N.K. Bacillus Subtilis HU58 Immobilized in Micropores of Diatomite for Using in Self-healing Concrete. Procedia Eng. 2017, 171, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, T.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, A.; Li, Z. Immobilizing bacteria in expanded perlite for the crack self-healing in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 148, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erşan, Y.Ç.; Hernandez-Sanabria, E.; Boon, N.; de Belie, N. Enhanced crack closure performance of microbial mortar through nitrate reduction. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 70, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bang, S.S.; Galinat, J.K.; Ramakrishnan, V. Calcite precipitation induced by polyurethane-immobilized Bacillus pasteurii. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2001, 28, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Tittelboom, K.V.; Belie, N.D.; Verstraete, W. Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, F.Z. Biomineralization, 2nd ed.; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2012; ISBN 978-7-302-27584-8. [Google Scholar]
- Lowenstam, H.A. Minerals Formed by Organisms. Science 1981, 211, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lowenstam, H.A.; Weiner, S. On Biomineralization; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989; ISBN 978-0-19-504977-0. [Google Scholar]
- Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Delgado, R.; del Moral, A.; Ferrer, M.R.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Precipatation of calcium carbonate by Vibrio spp. from an inland saltern. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1994, 13, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Paassen, L.A.; Ghose, R.; van der Linden, T.J.; van der Star, W.R.; van Loosdrecht, M.C. Quantifying Biomediated Ground Improvement by Ureolysis: Large-Scale Biogrout Experiment. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2010, 136, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dejong, J.T.; Mortensen, B.M.; Martinez, B.C.; Nelson, D.C. Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, C.; Cui, B.; Ge, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J. Reinforcement of Recycled Aggregate by Microbial-Induced Mineralization and Deposition of Calcium Carbonate—Influencing Factors, Mechanism and Effect of Reinforcement. Crystals 2021, 11, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, C.X.; Luo, M.; Fan, Q.F.; Li, R.Y. Mechanism of Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation in Self-healing Concrete. J. Chin. Silic. Soc. 2013, 41, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, L.; Islam, M.R. A New Microbial Plugging Process and Its Impact on Fracture Remediation. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA, 22–25 October 1995; Society of Petroleum Engineers: Houston, TX, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, H.; Qian, C.X.; Li, L.Z. Cementation Mechanism of Microbe Cement. J. Chin. Silic. Soc. 2013, 41, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Muynck, W.; Cox, K.; Belie, N.D.; Verstraete, W. Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Muynck, W.; Debrouwer, D.; De Belie, N.; Verstraete, W. Bacterial carbonate precipitation improves the durability of cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, S.K.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Bang, S.S. Remediation of Concrete Using Microorganisms. ACI Mater. J. 2001, 98, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramakrishnan, V. Performance characteristics of bacterial concrete—A smart biomaterial. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology, Washington, DC, USA, 19–21 September 2007; pp. 67–78. [Google Scholar]
- Bayat, Z.; Hassanshahian, M.; Cappello, S. Immobilization of Microbes for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Environments: A Mini Review. Open Microbiol. J. 2015, 9, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trevan, M. Enzyme immobilization by adsorption: A review. Adsorption 2014, 20, 801–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bouabidi, Z.B.; El-Naas, M.H.; Zhang, Z. Immobilization of microbial cells for the biotreatment of wastewater: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 17, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garmroodi, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Ramazani, A.; Ashjari, M.; Mohammadi, J.; Sabour, B.; Yousefi, M. Covalent binding of hyper-activated Rhizomucor miehei lipase (RML) on hetero-functionalized siliceous supports. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dzionek, A.; Wojcieszyńska, D.; Guzik, U. Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 23, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krishnamoorthi, S.; Banerjee, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Immobilized Enzyme Technology: Potentiality and Prospects. Enzymol. Metab. 2015, 1, 104. [Google Scholar]
- Bang, S.S.; Lippert, J.J.; Yerra, U.; Mulukutla, S.; Ramakrishnan, V. Microbial calcite, a bio-based smart nanomaterial in concrete remediation. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2010, 1, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgain, J.; Gaiani, C.; Linder, M.; Scher, J. Encapsulation of probiotic living cells: From laboratory scale to industrial applications. J. Food Eng. 2011, 104, 467–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.; Lu, J.; Jiang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Xin, F.; Jiang, M. Material-mediated cell immobilization technology in the biological fermentation proces. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2021, 15, 1160–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Chen, X. Research progress on enhancing the performance of autotrophic nitrogen removal systems using microbial immobilization technology. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.A.; Cui, Z.Q.; Qian, Z.Q.; Zheng, Y.H. Advances in Immobilized Microorganism and Its Applications of Wastewater Treatment. J. Chongqing Univ. 2004, 27, 125–129. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrotra, T.; Dev, S.; Banerjee, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Singh, R.; Aggarwal, S. Use of immobilized bacteria for environmental bioremediation: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, S.; Christena, L.R.; Rajaram, Y.R. Enzyme immobilization: An overview on techniques and support materials. 3 Biotech 2013, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zur, J.; Wojcieszynska, D.; Guzik, U. Metabolic Responses of Bacterial Cells to Immobilization. Molecules 2016, 21, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Martins, S.C.S.; Martins, C.M.; Fiúza, L.M.C.G.; Santaella, S.T. Immobilization of microbial cells: A promising tool for treatment of toxic pollutants in industrial wastewater. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 4412–4418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiser, D.; Sóti, P.L.; Bánóczi, G.; Bódai, V.; Kiss, B.; Gellért, Á.; Nagy, Z.K.; Koczka, B.; Szilágyi, A.; Marosi, G.; et al. Bioimprinted lipases in PVA nanofibers as efficient immobilized biocatalysts. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 7335–7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Erşan, Y.Ç.; Da Silva, F.B.; Boon, N.; Verstraete, W.; De Belie, N. Screening of bacteria and concrete compatible protection materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 88, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Jia, G.; Jiang, C.; Li, Z. Sugar-coated expanded perlite as a bacterial carrier for crack-healing concrete applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 232, 117222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.; Choi, E.K.; Park, W.; Yi, C.; Chung, N. Effectiveness of expanded clay as a bacteria carrier for self-healing concrete. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2019, 62, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhaskar, S.; Anwar Hossain, K.M.; Lachemi, M.; Wolfaardt, G.; Otini Kroukamp, M. Effect of self-healing on strength and durability of zeolite-immobilized bacterial cementitious mortar composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 82, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, Q.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S.; Su, Y.; Liu, B.; Yu, X.; Pan, Z.; Qian, C. Crack self-healing of cement-based materials by microorganisms immobilized in expanded vermiculite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 272, 121610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.Y.; Belie, N.D.; Verstraete, W. Diatomaceous earth as a protective vehicle for bacteria applied for self-healing concrete. J. Ind. Microbiol. 2012, 39, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zijun, Z.; Effeney, G.; Millar, G.J.; Stephen, M. Synthesis and cation exchange capacity of zeolite W from ultra-fine natural zeolite waste. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos, L.C.; Mayadevi, S.; Bogush, A.; Vanore, P.; Salvestrini, S. Sorption of metaldehyde using granular activated carbon. J. Water Reuse Desalin. 2017, 7, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, C.; Wu, J.Z.; Zhang, F.S. Development of porous ceramsite from construction and demolition waste. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 2241–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Zuo, J.; Liu, X. Self-Healing of Concrete Cracks by Ceramsite-Loaded Microorganisms. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 5153041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, C.; Xu, X.; Lv, Z.; Xing, L. Self-healing of Concrete Cracks by Immobilizing Microorganisms in Recycled Aggregate. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2020, 18, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feng, C.; Cui, B.; Huang, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J. Enhancement technologies of recycled aggregate—Enhancement mechanism, influencing factors, improvement effects, technical difficulties, life cycle assessment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 317, 126168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.S.; Zheng, J.L.; You, F. Review on Enhancement Methods of Recycled Aggregate. Mater. Rep. 2021, 35, 5053–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, T.; Su, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Qian, C. Effect and Mechanism of Encapsulation-Based Spores on Self-Healing Concrete at Different Curing Ages. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 52415–52432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Zheng, T.; Qian, C. Application potential of Bacillus megaterium encapsulated by low alkaline sulphoaluminate cement in self-healing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 273, 121740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Wang, X. Self-healing of concrete cracks by use of bacteria-containing low alkali cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, W.; Xue, D.; Zhao, Y. Application of bacterial spores coated by a green inorganic cementitious material for the self-healing of concrete cracks. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 113, 103718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Liu, S.; Ma, X.; Teng, Y.; Guan, X. Effect of different gypsum dosage on the chloride binding properties of C4AF hydrated paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 315, 125562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Su, Y.; Qian, C. Coupled effect of PP fiber, PVA fiber and bacteria on self-healing efficiency of early-age cracks in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 116810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauf, M.; Khaliq, W.; Khushnood, R.A.; Ahmed, I. Comparative performance of different bacteria immobilized in natural fibers for self-healing in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 258, 119578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.; Gupta, R. Cellulose fiber as bacteria-carrier in mortar: Self-healing quantification using UPV. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 28, 101090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Qian, C.; Rui, Y.; Feng, J. Exploring the coupled mechanism of fibers and bacteria on self-healing concrete from bacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 116, 103896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yldrm, G. Dimensional stability of deflection-hardening hybrid fiber reinforced concretes with coarse aggregate: Suppressing restrained shrinkage cracking. Struct. Concr. 2019, 20, 836–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homma, D.; Mihashi, H.; Nishiwaki, T. Self-Healing Capability of Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Composites. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2009, 7, 2141–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wen, C.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Hu, S. Influence of fibers on the mechanical properties and durability of ultra-high-performance concrete: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 52, 104370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Lian, J.; Gao, M.; Fu, D.; Yan, Y. Self-Healing Concrete Using Rubber Particles to Immobilize Bacterial Spores. Materials 2019, 12, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chan, C.W.; Yu, T.; Zhang, S.S.; Xu, Q.F. Compressive behaviour of FRP-confined rubber concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 211, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.Y.; Snoeck, D.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Verstraete, W.; De Belie, N. Application of hydrogel encapsulated carbonate precipitating bacteria for approaching a realistic self-healing in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 68, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Mignon, A.; Snoeck, D.; Wiktor, V.; Van Vliergerghe, S.; Boon, N.; De Belie, N. Application of modified-alginate encapsulated carbonate producing bacteria in concrete: A promising strategy for crack self-healing. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.; Mignon, A.; Trenson, G.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Boon, N.; De Belie, N. A chitosan based pH-responsive hydrogel for encapsulation of bacteria for self-sealing concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 93, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.Z.; Liao, Q.; Wang, Y.Z. Research Progress in Immobilized Microorganisms Carrier Material. Mater. Rep. 2011, 25, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
- Ullah, H.; Azizli, K.A.M.; Man, Z.B.; Ismail, M.B.C.; Khan, M.I. The Potential of Microencapsulated Self-healing Materials for Microcracks Recovery in Self-healing Composite Systems: A Review. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 429–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.C.; Li, X.P.; Wang, S.P. Research Status and Progress of Concrete Self-healing Microcapsule Wall Material. Mater. Rep. 2020, 34, 1201–1205. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, Y.Q.; Zhu, G.M.; Tang, J.N.; Xing, F. Influence of epoxy resin and its curing agent on the properties of biomicrocapsule. J. Shenzhen Univ. Sci. Eng. 2015, 32, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.Y.; Soens, H.; Verstraete, W.; De Belie, N. Self-healing concrete by use of microencapsulated bacterial spores. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pungrasmi, W.; Intarasoontron, J.; Jongvivatsakul, P.; Likitlersuang, S. Evaluation of Microencapsulation Techniques for MICP Bacterial Spores Applied in Self-Healing Concrete. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Da Silva, F.B.; Belie, N.D.; Boon, N.; Verstraete, W. Production of non-axenic ureolytic spores for self-healing concrete applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erşan, Y.Ç.; Verbruggen, H.; De Graeve, I.; Verstraete, W.; De Belie, N.; Boon, N. Nitrate reducing CaCO3 precipitating bacteria survive in mortar and inhibit steel corrosion. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 83, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seifan, M.; Sarmah, A.K.; Samani, A.K.; Ebrahiminezhad, A.; Ghasemi, Y.; Berenjian, A. Mechanical properties of bio self-healing concrete containing immobilized bacteria with iron oxide nanoparticles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 4489–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaliq, W.; Ehsan, M.B. Crack healing in concrete using various bio influenced self-healing techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; He, X.; Deng, X.; Wu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, J.; Hui, D. Application of nanomaterials in ultra-high performance concrete: A review. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2020, 9, 1427–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zou, L.; Lu, W. Hydrothermal modification of lignocellulosic waste as microbial immobilization carriers for ethanol production. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 142, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarker, F.; Karim, N.; Afroj, S.; Koncherry, V.; Novoselov, K.S.; Potluri, P. High-Performance Graphene-Based Natural Fiber Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 34502–34512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.L.; Liu, S.H. Research progress in microbial carrier materials for concrete crack repair. Concrete 2017, 7, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.Y.; Gu, L.L.; Tong, Z.H.; Kang, D.K.; Shi, L.J.; Kong, G.H. Functional Modification and Application Progress of Hydrogels. Chin. Polym. Bull. 2019, 8, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalinowski, M.; Woyciechowski, P.; Sokołowska, J. Effect of mechanically-induced fragmentation of polyacrylic superabsorbent polymer (SAP) hydrogel on the properties of cement composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghobashy, M.M.; Bassioni, G. pH stimuli-responsive poly(acrylamide-co-sodium alginate) hydrogels prepared by γ-radiation for improved compressive strength of concrete. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 2123–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter Type | Parameter | Change | Effects |
---|---|---|---|
Carrier performance | Surface roughness | ↑ | Positive |
Porosity | ↑ | Positive | |
Solubility | ↑ | Negative | |
Biological hazard | ↓ | Positive | |
Hydrophobicity | ↑ | Negative | |
Type of functional groups | - | Neutral | |
Environmental factors | pH | ↑/↓ | Negative |
Temperature | ↑/↓ | Negative | |
Flow velocity | ↑ | Negative | |
Ion concentration | ↑/↓ | Negative | |
Cell concentration | ↑ | Positive | |
Binding agent/Adsorbent | - | Positive | |
Microbial cell | Cells age | ↑ | Negative |
Physiological state | ↑ | Positive | |
Surface structure | - | Neutral |
Carrier Material Type | Carrier | Immobilized Microorganisms | Immobilization Method | Immobilization Technique | Crack Healing Width (mm) | Refs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aggregate | ED | B. subtilis HU58 | Adsorption | Mixing extrusion molding | 1.8 | [6] |
EC EP | B. cohnii | Adsorption | Impregnated under vacuum, coating with a geopolymer | 0.45 (EC) 0.79 (EP) | [7] | |
Zeolite | S. pasteurii S. ureae | Adsorption | Vibrating mixing | 0.1 (S. pasteurii) 0.07 (S. ureae) | [44] | |
EV | P. mucilaginosus | Adsorption | Impregnated under vacuum, wrapping with the composite paste | 0.4 | [45] | |
GAC | D. nitroreducens P. aeruginosa | Adsorption | Impregnated under vacuum | 0.4 | [8] | |
Ceramsite | S. pasteurii ATCC 11859 | Adsorption | Ceramsite pretreatment (Alkali erosion and sintering treatments), immersing | 0.3 | [50] | |
Porous glass beads | S. pasteurii ATCC 11859 | Covalent binding | Vibrating mixing | - | [31] | |
RA | S. pasteurii A484 | Adsorption | Impregnated under vacuum | 0.28 | [51] | |
Low-alkali cementitious materials | SC | B. mucilaginous L3 | Adsorption | SC wraps spores and nutrients | 0.5 | [54] |
B. megaterium | Adsorption | Mixing extrusion molding | - | [55] | ||
Carbide slag etc. | B. cereus CS1 | Adsorption | Carbide slag etc. wraps spores and nutrients | 0.55 | [57] | |
Organic materials | PVA fibers | - | Adsorption | Stir the mixture simply | - | [59] |
Coir etc. | B. subtilis KCTC 3135T | Adsorption | Soaked in a bacterial spore suspension | - | [60] | |
Cellulose fiber | B. subtilis | Adsorption | Soaked in a bacterial spore suspension | - | [61] | |
PP fibers | B. alcalophilus | Adsorption | Stir the mixture simply | 0.5 | [62] | |
Rubber particles | S. pasteurii ATCC11859 | Adsorption | Mixing and air-drying | 0.86 | [66] | |
PU foam | S. pasteurii ATCC 11859 | Adsorption | Mixing and stirring | - | [9] | |
B. sphaericus LMG 22557 | Encapsulation | PU prepolymer, accelerator, and bacterial suspension are mixed to form PU foam | - | [10] | ||
Hydrogel (PEO-PPO-PEO) | B. sphaericus LMG 22557 | Encapsulation | Mixing of spores, nutrients, and polymer solution, adding initiator, degassing, UV irradiation, freeze grinding, and drying. | 0.5 | [68] | |
Modified-alginate hydrogel | B. sphaericus LMG 22557 | Encapsulation | Mixing of bacterial spore suspension with the polymer solution, adding initiator, UV irradiation, freeze grinding, and drying | - | [69] | |
Microcapsule | Epoxy | - | Encapsulation | Mixing and curing to form microcapsules | - | [74] |
Melamine | B. sphaericus LMG 22557 | Encapsulation | Formation of biomicrocapsules based on polycondensation reaction | 0.97 | [75] | |
SA | B. sphaericus LMG 22557 | Encapsulation | Mixing and freeze-drying | 0.17 | [76] | |
Bacterial self–protection material | CERUP | - | Flocculation | - | 0.45 | [77] |
Nitrate reducing microbial community | - | Flocculation | - | - | [78] | |
Nanomaterials | IONs | B. sphaericus NZRM 4381 B. licheniformis ATCC 9789 | Adsorption | - | - | [79] |
Graphite nano platelets | B. subtilis | Adsorption | Soaked in a bacterial spore suspension | 0.81 | [80] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Feng, C.; Zong, X.; Cui, B.; Guo, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J. Application of Carrier Materials in Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization. Crystals 2022, 12, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060797
Feng C, Zong X, Cui B, Guo H, Zhang W, Zhu J. Application of Carrier Materials in Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization. Crystals. 2022; 12(6):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060797
Chicago/Turabian StyleFeng, Chunhua, Xudong Zong, Buwen Cui, Hui Guo, Wenyan Zhang, and Jianping Zhu. 2022. "Application of Carrier Materials in Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization" Crystals 12, no. 6: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060797
APA StyleFeng, C., Zong, X., Cui, B., Guo, H., Zhang, W., & Zhu, J. (2022). Application of Carrier Materials in Self-Healing Cement-Based Materials Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization. Crystals, 12(6), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060797